Hi Brien. There seems to be some interesting ruins approximately 3km to the south of Stonehenge at 51.152499, -1.832383. Does Maria know anything about these ruins?
‘How To Read Stonehenge’ Fascinating, meticulously researched ground-breaking new book - by local author Colin Parker who has spent many years investigating the mystery surrounding Britain’s most enigmatic monument. We think of Stonehenge as a religious temple but it is much more. Colin’s multi-disciplined approach to Stonehenge and its landscape, enabled him to decipher the hidden in plain sight Stonehenge ‘architects double-doorway stone formations visual key’ cunningly produced by perspective, mentioned by Henry of Huntington in 1130 AD…which reveals Britain’s Most Famous Landmark to be a working device constructed to indicate the sunrise and sunset on sixteen ‘vitally important’ dates in their ancient and our modern agricultural calendar - thousands of years later. Despite the presumed pilfering of around half the stones by various unknown people throughout history, provided you do not stand within the stones as advised by the various authorities, but instead remain outside the stone circle on the visitors designated pathway looking through the stones still standing today! After reading ‘How to Read Stonehenge’ you too will know the assigned double-doorway stone formations chosen by the architects for the sun too rise and set between, on or around the day of your past or future visit. The double-doorway assigned by the architects for the June summer solstice sunset, when Stonehenge is closed is shown on the front cover produced using two photographs. The first in the sunset sequence resembling a reflection is shown upside down. Not to be confused with the June summer solstice sunrise, witnessed that morning by thousands of people granted special access within the stones, who like the million plus visitors per year believe archaeologists and others, who state Stonehenge is a non-working ruined temple constructed solely for the December winter solstice sunset. Further information, stunning photographs featured in the book visit: www.howtoreadstonehenge.com
Should try measuring the electro magnetic fields at and around stonehenge, telling stories and speculation is really tiring, we need scientists to examone these sites with all sorts of instruments to determine what the real story is.
Afraid she's not giving the whole picture, not all the inner ring are bluestones. Of those that are, are from Garn Goedog (two miles away from my house) They are less speckled that the outcrop at Garn Menyn which they ignored.... Have no idea what the North Wales reference is about but it does shine some light on this channel; if nothing else.
They used ground penetrating sonar all around Stonehenge and there’s 20 different sites in all directions all within 20 miles if not closer. They are circular with pillars as well. There was more going on!
C.S.R I know there must be tons of artifacts in the ground with all of them. Even at Stonehenge, all the little mounds are hiding stuff. Also, there are several towns in England that were built up around circular layouts.
Brian, in Norway we have forests of standing stones on top of mountains in "Møre og Romsdal". Sticking up like needles in the sky. Some stones have a big hole in the middle. Norwegian archeologists dont talk about it at all, neither do they know what it is.
@@Rarez2 Google provide very little of whats to see there. Barerly found any good pictures from it. Had to lurk until i found a PDF file with some pictures. Google maps, you wont see anything i believe. There is snow on the mountain on the satelite foto
However there are some pics, if you search "Blåskjæringen stones" or "Blåskjæringen steiner" you might find some pictures from that particular place. If you want better pics you should look for a PDF file from NTNU (Norwegian technical university for science) called "Gåtefulle steinar i fjella" :) At some of the first sites there should be an article about different places with these stones.
2) In college I decided to go out of body to Stonehenge. My family from Scotland are Spiritualist. So I knew I could get to that time period out of body. I was looking for how to do levitation also. I knew I would see Space Ships, and stones floating. I went with Angels, landed right next to behind the Veil of the Space Ship. I saw a little alien running under the ship. I didn't know they could run, usually the just walk. I saw some large 7 to 8 feet tall brown haired humans fighting hand to hand close by no weapons. Wow I thought look, no illness. No polio, no Spanish Flu, no Plagues. The most healthy humans I have ever seen. They had brown hair and were tan living outside all the time. They wore little rabbits furs here and there. Non of it could have made them warmer. I asked the little Alien " What are the humans doing?". He looked at me, like darn another out of body. And then he shrugged his shoulders. Like who ever knows what humans are doing? I thought. Just when aliens land, humans will be so busy fighting other humans!! Sounds crazy. Just then I saw a tall outer row stone floating 3 feet off the ground. I looked around thinking yes I am a human you can watch me look under the rock, over the rock, and at the front and back. Nothing is visible moving this Rock. I don't care if I embarrass myself looking or not.
thanks for sharing: i dont know if you had your oobe at stonehenge, but it is a ufo hotspot. connecting psychically to stonehenge is probably what it's designed for. I believe there's an electromagnetic portal above the stones: ufos and crop circles are seen here because it is a "portal gateway". From the research I've done, stonehenge (in human terms) was (and maybe still is) a site of healing (people would make pilgrimages to the site to be healed)- and this happened for 1000s of years. So, when you say: "the most healthy humans I've ever seen" - that actually ties in with the site's real purpose. (I dont believe it was just a calendar). it's not crazy at all to say "humans fight other humans", because humans are like this. unless we (humans) become peaceful and conquer our fears, the ETs are never gonna land here (in my view): its not just about them... its about us. peace. thanks for reading.
Modern day Stonehedge is completely fake and was reconstructed in 1919 and the 1950s. There are extensive photographs of this, including concrete mixer. Watch this video ua-cam.com/video/5TJOkR6lAaA/v-deo.html
I was surprised to see people walking in amongst the stones, because when I was there a few years back it was completely fenced in and it was pouring. We got drenched, but nice to have experienced the famous Stonehenge all the same.
If their theory were to be true would we not see plenty of other examples of this particular stone in and around this area? Smh It doesn't seem to add up and is simply a theory without any basis in my opinion. We would see the evidence of this scattered amoungst the region. Without that evidence I cannot see how such a theory could hold...
In Norway we have "forests" of stone on some mountains, that barerly anyone knows about. Archeologist dont know what it is and dont talk about it- at all! There is also special stonecircles there and also labyrinth-figures in the area. Some stones with holes in the middle. Biggest is 3 m tall.
I love ur channel Brien! Being so interested in ancient mystery and lost knowledge, your channel really quenches my thirst! Keep doing what you do and maintain your health so we can keep getting this awesome info for many many years to come! #FanfromSt.Louis
I've been to Stonehenge, but unfortunately wasn't able to go inside. It is mind blowing from a distance, but seeing people standing beside the stones gives me a whole new appreciation for it. Truly amazing.
It’s not far from where I live, but it took me 59 years to get around to visiting it........magical place. The circle at Avebury is pretty spectacular as well.
@@freshrot420 The glaciers wiped everything clean just 10 thousand years ago. A lot of stuff much older than that is already recycled in the magma except for places here and there. We're going to have a really hard time figuring out what actually happened.
@@freshrot420 Rubbish. There is a fuck ton of historical recordings on Stonehenge, some dating back to Medieval times, in the form of drawings, painting, prints as well as the written word. For example, Thomas Hearne’s 1779 Antiquities of Great Britain has an engraving of Stonehenge showing signs of disrepair and Flemish painter, Lucas de Heere, made a topographical watercolour of the monument, detailing the mortise and tenons of the lintels and the earth ditch, dating from circa 1573. Here is a website dedicated to artwork dated from the early-mid 18th Century to the present day, all depicting Stonehenge as we see it today. artuk.org/discover/stories/stonehenge-in-art
That really sucks that they rebuilt it and covered it with concrete. No wonder they don't allow most people past the barrier. They don't want people to see that they're trying to rewrite history. When my daughter lived in London in 2006, we went there and couldn't get past the barrier, but I did get to talk to one of the crows on one of the standing stones on the outer perimeter, lol. He didn't fly away. He just stayed there and looked at me the entire time and acted like he understood every word I said. So yeah, I know I'm crazy. I just like crows.
srvntlilly Crows are one of my favorite of the flying beings..the one that you spoke with probably has ancient knowledge passed down from his ancestors, but we humans don't have the wisdom or ability to learn his language.
They didn't rebuild it, it was just repaired. Some stones were falling over and it was feared that a stone might fall onto a visitor. The ones that had fallen were replaced in the original holes and were set in concrete to prevent them falling again. As for the barriers, it's to prevent graffiti and damage to the ground.
last time I was there (after glastonbury festival about 15+ years ago (shit time flies, time for a revisit) we weren't allowed to be with in 20+ (50?) feet of the stones... good to see you can walk through them now
Great work Brien. Your guide was amazing. Thank you for the information. I was thinking while looking at the stones. "These stones remind me of the massive damage other stones around the world saw at the 12,000 years ago mark.." Wish I could see them polished and shining in the sun on solstice!
The best source is "Stonehenge, A Temple Restor'd to the British Druids" by William Stukeley [1740]. Original copies do surface for sale now and again. Online copies can be found. Harvard has a copy at iiif.lib.harvard.edu/manifests/view/drs:46626364$152i
The first credible mention of Stonehenge dates to c.50-BC, by Roman chronicler Diodorus Siculus in his descriptions of 'Hyperborea', the Roman name for Britannia. It is mentioned several times in the 11th century, with some crude depictions. It is included in the Domesday Bok. Geoffrey of Monmouth concocted a fanciful creation tale of the stones in the 12th century, and how Merlin raised them by 'Art Majick'. It is widely mentioned from the 13th century onward, with increasingly accurate depictions. It has been seriously studied from at least the 16th century by many of those eras notable scientists. Stuckeley, Aubrey, Jones, to name just 3. It has never been moved, nor has it been added to or subtracted from. It has had some restoration work done, but only two fallen stones have been re-raised. Several others have been straightened, and yes, there is concrete at the base of these re-seated stones.
1) This is cool. When I was in high school my mother showed me a picture of Stonehenge. She asked me what I thought about it. I said it is a dry dock for space ships. I had a very Ancient life so I remembered all the large grey ships all over the UK. Humans had ships in the Ocean. The Space ships were so normal over land that if they were gone we would have gotten scared if they disappeared.
Peter Müller Yes there is a few video's on it.. Saying it was actually built in 1954.. Showing large Crain's lifting and placing the stones.. So they definitely did some kind of work on it..
Stonehenge was built in 1954. There are original pictures of the building process. No wander it has all the measurements of Earth and North and South and stuff. It was built around 100 years ago with modern mans machinery. There is one of the stones that shows the concrete underneath the fake stone cover. Watch it your self: ua-cam.com/video/8aCFppygoCw/v-deo.html
So when they "rebuilt" it and changed the layout of it. That makes all those "Uuuu feelings and o look it lines up with the sun and stuff all FAKE. We have no idea how it was laid out originally before the "reconstruction" And now we have people who go to those stones and can talk to the ancestors 5000 years back. RIGHTTTTT. And they make money off of it. Just like this lady!
for anyone wanting to visit Stonehenge, get up early on a nice day and be there at opening time. Without the hordes of people it's fantastic. We went via the Avebury stone circle too, 8am at Avebury with the mist floating around the ancient stones, wow.
Would love to have the sound reworked so we could actually hear clearly what was being said. Just learned from comments that the thing was reworked in the 1950' s! That changes everything for me. I'd have to see before and after photos to believe any relevancy now! Can check this off my bucket list until further proof of anything! Thanks though!
Thank you Brien Foerster for your excellent research on Stonehenge. I found out a lot today. You do an excellent job of finding the real age of these stones, and where they originated from. Thank you.
If it's 12,000 years old, doesn't that coincide with other megalithic structures like in puma punku, easter island etc? And didn't sea levels rise rapidly around that time, suggesting a melting of a mini ice age and flood? Correct me if i'm wrong, just trying to piece these structures and destructions together
Kurtis Gobekli Tepe is another 12 thousand year old site in Turkey the discovered fairly recently. Similar to Stonehenge but far more extensive. Supposedly buried on purpose for some reason... Maybe the flood..?
I've seen the pictures with the cranes and so on. May be they are fake because the engllish could not swallow not having an important megalith. Just like the Piltdown man.
yeah same with machu picchu in peru and the pyramid of egypt, And they just recently discovered of what could been an asteroid hitting the earth around 12,00 years ago located at greenland. All the the dots seems to slowly connecting right now. all of these sophisticated structures are just so impossible to built with primitive people 4,500 years ago. There must be an advance human civilization that existed before us 12,000 years ago!
"A massive crater hides beneath Greenland’s ice ,The discovery could breathe new life into a controversial hypothesis that suggests that an impact about 13,000 years ago triggered a mysterious 1,000-year cold snap known as the Younger Dryas " www.sciencenews.org/article/impact-crater-greenland-asteroid-younger-dryas
Ah the good old beaker people. That brings me back to the days when I spent hours digging in the dirt in cold wet weather to find tiny shards of their pottery.
You were even treated to some real, live English weather. Just to make the experience more authentic. Thanks to Maria for sharing those interesting facts.
I live in the UK and have been to stonehenge many times...it is FAR older than we are told by many thousands of years ...and just the shaping and construction leaves no other explanation than lost ancient high technology. Remember, we are told that this was built when we were no more than rolling around in the mud evolution wise ??...Peace.
Stonhenge was "refurbished" in the late 30's and the restorer's vision of what he thought it should look like incorporated . Its easily confirmed . Truly amazing listening to this young lady recite her speel lol .
Really amazing sacred geometry happens here. It's like the maths, the spiritualism and some non specialist tool methods got passed around from Egypt or Peru but not the methods to make the tools to finely hone the stone. Apparently the heel stone has tilted exactly the amount and direction of procession so that it still lines up perfectly. I think it's given as 0.5 degrees.
Absolutely astonishing. I did not know about the polishing at all. which really begs the question when positioning these in the first place (not counting the repositioning in the last century) we'd have to have this polishing in mind. I think one day we'll find that there's much more to the Bronze Age then we realize and even more so it's the ages that came before. It's my personal belief that mankind has gone through this cycle of either surviving natural disasters or self-inflicted Falls that have created multiple resets of human civilization.
Glaciers that covered Wales in the Pleistocene Epoch, brought massive amounts of the underlying bedrock over, finally depositing its load over SW England so there was never any need to transport big stones over great distance.
Why does every single ruin have to be for rituals, the constellations, mathematical equations etc. etc.Why couldn't Stonehenge be a fortress of some sort ,an important meeting place, everything has some grand hidden meaning???
Yes, they always seem to want to turn everything into a calendar! It may not have been used for that purpose at all. We will likely never know the purpose of Stonehenge, after all none of us were there when it was built. It's like the Egyptian pyramids...they like to claim that they were tombs, yet no mummies were ever found inside them. Academic dogma dies hard.
One could ask why you think anything has to have had a mundane purpose instead. I've seen many make this types of comments, the underlying idea being this civilization must have been similar to ours, and in our time it is indeed the case that we spend a lot of effort building things that have no actual value whatsoever. This is the type of civilization you want to glorify, and project on those ancient cultures as well? It's almost as if some people have to stress what is most trivial and mundane in an effort to deny anything of a more transcendent nature, which is a reflection of the spirit of the age we live in indeed.
I have a booklet dated 1929 witch gives some of the history of the place .inside is a picture taken of the stones in 1893 .there's also a plan of the area showing standing stones of witch there are 23 .all others fallen.
There are 2 alternative versions of this construction. (1) In the Norse regions, they had the annual "ting." the gathering of the peoples, like a public fair (state fair) and a judicial court. All legal actions, marrige, dowries, fights, feuds, big sales, etc would be handled at the gathering. It is entirely possible that this was the British "ting" of its time. (2) With the actual dating of the Stonehenge into Era-3, there is the statement that this was a UFO landing support edifice. Other interpretations, that there are also other henges in the same area, ... and with wattle-and-daub wood and stucco inbetween the stones and the ceiling closed in and covered, it would make a very excellent warm communal large family housing area, with a central fire, ... or (like modern era ice houses) it could be a fridge larder and root cellar for the community, with ice/packed snow put around the side walls for insulation.
Thank You Brien, I thought I knew a little about Stonehedge but so much more to know. And of course this is what you do and have created so much more than the mainstream or fakestream as I call it. I am learning and thinking with each one or your videos. Many Thanks Brien! Love, Light and Peace! Daveyjo in Pennsylvania
Brien,you mentioned in your vids earlier no C-14 carbon dating can be obtained from non-organic material. Then how would they have achieved it at Stonehenge?
Brian any chance you could look at newgrange in county Meath in Ireland? It was apparently built about 5000 years ago which predates phase one of Stonehenge by about 1000 years and the pyramids but 400-500 years, it has huge stones at its base and the roof is corbelled and has never let any water inside the chamber, it also has a roof box over the entrance which aligns with the sunrise on the winter solstice and it lights up the whole chamber inside. I've had a trip and its a really cool place but with all the stuff you do maybe you can get some new info
at 2:52 min the really stunning part is that the ancient builders already knew exactly about the mile and the feet as they are used today in Britain. Oh, boy...
I think Stonehenge is much older than the official version, when you consider most of the original damage was the Atlantic side of the monument looking like it had been hit by a tsunami one has to wonder if it was damaged during the great flood.
@kevin m to celebrate the winter and summer solstice. These were very important things back then. They marked the time of year for growing food, harvesting etc etc There would have also been various religious beliefs associated with the Sun and Moon.
I got a big question never ever asked about Stone Hedge Mr B Foster? What kind of force is needed to release the horizontal Stone's which lay on top.?? Was this a lame excuse for vandalism? Was this maybe a huge title wave.?
She didn't even mention all the wood pillars that were in place or how the scenery was laden with Forrest and how many more henges there are in the area.
Sorry for my inadequate English. During the last 2.6 million years, there has been at least 30 peroids of glaciers. Glaciers create tremendous power, and did all the hard work to move the stones to the site. The ancient people wasn't that stupid, they didn't transported the heavy rocks all the way from Wales. I know the TV-program "Drain the Ocean." Is it possible to drain the soil all the way down to the bed rock? Is it possible, what do we find? My guess: A large number of stones similar to those in Stonehenge, at the site, or nearby. "But if the glaciers did the transport, why isn't there some stones left on the ground? People could smash the big stones to smaller pieces and use then to other things, or the ancient people planned the construction of the number of stones they found at the site.
The masculine stone on the right at the beginning has what looks like a scoop taken out... like it was as soft as ice cream once.....! Noticed this on many megalithic stone, such as the stone boxes in Egypt, this was done to take out the cracks to keep the integrity of the stone... but for what function ??????
Fascinating. Is she saying it's dated to the Younger Dryas time (12,800 BC)? Or before or after? I would like to see a computer animation of Stonehenge with the different colors she's talking about.
@Jeremy Kirkpatrick Did you research the video he spoke of or are you offended someone did more research than you? Stonehenge's authenticity and original stone arrangement has been moved in the past. Like a compromised crime scene. Next time Jeremy.. Slow down on your insults. You totally jumped the gun. Since you are familiar with Stonehenge.. Please post the link to the video showing Stonehenge being raped. I can post the video, but i want to see if you are full of shit first.
It's not hidden information that the fallen stones were lifted and set where they believed they were originally. That in no way makes Stonehenge a hoax or a twentieth century construct.
@@dysonsquared Reconstructed means not original. Plus.. Did the druids use steal beams 4 thousand years ago? How about concrete? Should they tear apart the pyramids and rebuild them? Would they be authentic? Not everyone knows Stonehenge was pulled apart, rebuilt and had complete stones made of concrete and steal. Stonehenge is not what you think it is and has been raped of its origins. Like legos.
@Dave Wallace pardon me... Yes there are steel beams inside a concrete shell. No stone..no "steal". Spelling and grammar nazis have nothing else to contribute except barking like a dog. Stonehenge is a contaminated crime scene, It has no historical value.
As with most history, pick what you want others to believe and disregard or destroy the rest. Or partly here, change it to match you own ideas of history, thus changing history.
I read that the people who built Stonehenge we're from the Holy Land descendants of the biblical King Hezekiah. Or they took part in the construction with the local population of England. Edgar Cayce.
Maria speaks about that place as if she is 100% certain of the bullshit she saying it all sound great but keep it 💯% nobody knows anything about the ancient past .
At 6:24, the crack at the bottom of the stone lets us see different material from the inside of the stone. The tour guide Maria should have said something about it but she chose not to say anything. Why?
stone henge was actually rebuilt for the first time in 1901 then again in 1919 and then again in 1958 by the british government plus every body needs to watch the code by carl munck
oringinally much larger , stone henge was 'a hall of mirrors area where humans and animals were thrown into the mix" back when renegade bad aliens not the good ones ruled earth,Martian connections-author lou baldin/baldini
ok sounds reasonable. one question tho, which gods would you consider "good" who still have a say here on earth? i do not agree with "in the west we are mostly tested with integrity and attitude", we are also tested by karma/punishment like the rest. i also do not really understand what you mean by integrity and attitude.
@@koloblicin we don't know the "good"gods names, they allow bad aliens to dole out karma for limited privileges. Our guides have a sayand they can change over a lifetime. Yes Integrity/attitude leads to karma for us in the west also- "that's how the universe works" Integrity is trying to do the right thing all the time and a good attitude ie no evny and hate. That's what we're judged on in dreams and final judgement.See "weighing of the heart" ancient Egypt carvings on google images or "separating the wheat from the chaff" - a saying from fictional bible. Another picture is Earth is a cow manure field and they're waiting for turd blooms.. A school of hard knocks, it's better towards center of this galaxy. No big bang theory here's where the dirt under your feet come from- From the good aliens- the Earth was spat out from the Sun like popcorn from kettle-Ancient Egyptians know everything came from Sun and I've more proof plus this...ua-cam.com/video/rrm3JiRe-nE/v-deo.html
@@koloblicin Hey Kolo I replied twice to you today, further, bad aliens are off the reincarnation wheel (not being tested). Again we in the west are tested being put through the finer points of integrity usually, and usually in the 3rd world they die at very young age so no/little testing/no learning just punishment- Their next lives are often better. As I said karma/reincarnation explain it all, it's what most in the world believe in. Many stories of reincarnation also on youtube. Sometimes when UFOs capture bad aliens they show the negative/renegade limited options or none and agree to a new starting pointing for it, taking many lifetimes. Here's 100 UFOs in 1 min mostly at start of clip, look for electric balls of light, cleverly filmed by the author I mentioned above, I've filmed them kind of the same way many times- ps taking questions on Pyramids- Mars/souls if you please. ua-cam.com/users/results?search_query=sun+2+lou+baldin
It wasn't rebuilt, it was restored. There were large stones that had fallen so were put back, and some were leaning dangerously. They were removed and then the area was excavated. Bone fragments, pottery etc was found and then the stone were put back where they were. Some were put in concrete in the ground to keep them safe and upright.
I enjoy your videos Brian, and I know you did apologize before the video started. However, you have been doing this long enough surely to at least have a fluffy mic cover for just such occasions? Can't recall the lady's name just now but she was telling us some fascinating stuff about our stones. I have communed there at solstice and it is a wondrous, powerful place. Going to see if your guide has a channel or whatnot where I can hear more. Thanks for all of your films of your travels around the World Brian. You're doing great. Just get a muffler for Gaia's sake. Plus, I'd happily show you some special parts of the UK that would suit your tours. Just say.
Brian, the entire site was re-erected, starting in 1919..... what you are seeing is a recreation. Much concrete, lead seals to hold the cap stones..... NOT a one of them were erect. Most were flat down on the ground... and some were so slanted ready to fall Churchill was afraid to walk next to them during his visit to the site.
Brien Foerster! I keep hearing there is a bigger and more well-preserved version of Stonehenge, in the Louisiana Valley in The United States. Would you consider investigating that?
Had a hard time visualizing the scale to get an idea for the cap (top) stones, and I'm 56 years old. I just recently got a true scale for the first time of the GTEAT PYRAMID. CONCLUSION: HUMAN BEINGS COULD NOT HAVE BUILT THEM. IT WAS THE GLORIOUS SON'S OF GOD OF THE BIBLE, AND THEY'RE BACK. YOU WILL FIND THEM, IN THE BOOKS OF: GENESIS JOB EZEKIEL REVELATION THESE ARE THE BOOKS I KNOW OF. HOW DID I COME TO THIS CONCLUSION? EASY REALLY. JUST PUT SCIENCE AND RELIGION TOGETHER, HAND IN HAND, LIKE IT SHOULD BE. MYSTERY SOLVED.
At 00:57, the bottom of one of the stones has crumbled and might have disclosed some truth in building the stones. The lady should talk about it. The cameraman should have shot longer closeups.
How on earth can you use carbon dating to show it’s 12000 years old? Impossible as there’s no organic material left. Archeological , ground radar, and aerial surveys are revealing that the site is really huge and what we see today is just a small part of a much much bigger arrangement. Totally amazing place that I’ve visited many times and glad that it’s more accessible now, with a visitor centre and reconstruction of a village. I remember when you just parked the car off the main road and walked up to it , but then vandals kept painting graffiti on the stones and it was fenced off. It’s interesting to think that Stonehenge was being built at around the same time as the pyramids in Egypt. Very different technology but both connected to celestial worship. Orion for the Egyptians and the sun and moon for the ‘hengers’. History is truly wonderful.
Yeah history is wonderful. But your take on the limitations of carbon dating is not so wonderful. FYI it is useful to 50 thousand years. The half life of carbon 14 is 5730 years, and can be measured over many half life cycles before it is almost entirely decayed into Nitrogen 12. This is a well know fact.
@@Pitman33 Why you are pretty smart aren't you? But the point you missed is this. They don't carbon date the stone, but the organic substances on it. If the organic substances show a carbon 14 date of 12,000 years, that would mean that the stones were polished prior to that age. And 12,000 years is well within the limits of carbon 14 dating.
@@Pitman33 Well for starters... fungus, bird and bug shit, diatoms...etc. Do you actually thing the rocks have remained sterile for several thousand years? There are organic substances covering the earth, in the water, in the dirt, it's everywhere. Unlikely there is no substances of organic organic embedded within the texture of the stones. If you think so, that is your prerogative. I am not a believer. BTW they are not dating the rocks. They are dating the construction, of which there are other clues like the ones I am speaking of here.
You can't carbon-14 date rocks, typically. I'm not memorized by the establishment or academia or anything in particular, and I also suspect that there were ancient advanced humans beyond what we currently accept, but to substantiate findings and strengthen your story, you need to incorporate adequate knowledge of basic physics, including radioactive decay.
Any magnetic anomalies? Any ringing/ metallic sounds when hitting stones? (Did you see the video in south america where they hit a random stone that rings like a bell?) What if you polish megalithic stones around the world.. do they also have specific colours? 😁
Interesting stuff but at 7:20 I heard something bizarre cause according to Graham Hancock nothing but organic material can be dated through the C14-method.
Maybe Stonehenge has more significance then first thought. It looks a bit like a crude version of gobekli tepe.. and like other circles with T shaped pillars. Wouldn't surprise me if the original Stonehenge had T shaped pillars like the other great archaeological sites like on Menorca.
They don't know, nearly all guesswork. It's great how they nearly all fail to point out the stone that has granite inside, they try to tell us that this was placed inside for support... Give me a break. Its funny how she talks of cement, because it looks like the stones have indeed had cement poured over them. P.S I have uploaded lots of photos of the henge on my channel if you fancy a look.
Stonehenge was build as a 'machine to keep the Earth in balance'. All the megalithic buildings, all over the globe, in wich the sun is shining on the summer - or winter solstice or the equinoxes are machines with the same purpose, to keep the earth in balance. In many myth the story of an earth out of balance is the most importance subject. In some stories the world even turnes upside down. Ofcourse people got afraid and did want to get a grip on it with rituals. Thats why they build this structures in wich they performed the rituals on that specific data. So it is not the sun that was warshipped, but the stabilety of the rotating earth-globe. That is my opinion after many years of studying the archaeological data on this and myth on this subject, and ofcourse our solar system.
We had special permission to enter Stonehenge thanks to Maria Wheatley. Only 40 people of 4000 daily visitors get to go inside.
Hey Brien, did you know that the Externsteine in Germany are at the same longitude as Stonehenge?
Hi Brien. There seems to be some interesting ruins approximately 3km to the south of Stonehenge at 51.152499, -1.832383. Does Maria know anything about these ruins?
‘How To Read Stonehenge’ Fascinating, meticulously researched ground-breaking new book - by local author Colin Parker who has spent many years investigating the mystery surrounding Britain’s most enigmatic monument. We think of Stonehenge as a religious temple but it is much more. Colin’s multi-disciplined approach to Stonehenge and its landscape, enabled him to decipher the hidden in plain sight Stonehenge ‘architects double-doorway stone formations visual key’ cunningly produced by perspective, mentioned by Henry of Huntington in 1130 AD…which reveals Britain’s Most Famous Landmark to be a working device constructed to indicate the sunrise and sunset on sixteen ‘vitally important’ dates in their ancient and our modern agricultural calendar - thousands of years later. Despite the presumed pilfering of around half the stones by various unknown people throughout history, provided you do not stand within the stones as advised by the various authorities, but instead remain outside the stone circle on the visitors designated pathway looking through the stones still standing today!
After reading ‘How to Read Stonehenge’ you too will know the assigned double-doorway stone formations chosen by the architects for the sun too rise and set between, on or around the day of your past or future visit. The double-doorway assigned by the architects for the June summer solstice sunset, when Stonehenge is closed is shown on the front cover produced using two photographs. The first in the sunset sequence resembling a reflection is shown upside down. Not to be confused with the June summer solstice sunrise, witnessed that morning by thousands of people granted special access within the stones, who like the million plus visitors per year believe archaeologists and others, who state Stonehenge is a non-working ruined temple constructed solely for the December winter solstice sunset.
Further information, stunning photographs featured in the book visit: www.howtoreadstonehenge.com
Stonehenge was built in 1954. There are photos to prove this. fishki.net/46388-stroitelstvo-stounhendzha-108-foto.html
Should try measuring the electro magnetic fields at and around stonehenge, telling stories and speculation is really tiring, we need scientists to examone these sites with all sorts of instruments to determine what the real story is.
Fascinating to hear about what the original colours of the stones would have looked like. It would have looked beautiful.
Afraid she's not giving the whole picture, not all the inner ring are bluestones. Of those that are, are from Garn Goedog (two miles away from my house) They are less speckled that the outcrop at Garn Menyn which they ignored.... Have no idea what the North Wales reference is about but it does shine some light on this channel; if nothing else.
They used ground penetrating sonar all around Stonehenge and there’s 20 different sites in all directions all within 20 miles if not closer. They are circular with pillars as well. There was more going on!
C.S.R I know there must be tons of artifacts in the ground with all of them. Even at Stonehenge, all the little mounds are hiding stuff. Also, there are several towns in England that were built up around circular layouts.
Brian, in Norway we have forests of standing stones on top of mountains in "Møre og Romsdal". Sticking up like needles in the sky. Some stones have a big hole in the middle. Norwegian archeologists dont talk about it at all, neither do they know what it is.
Biggest standing stone is about 3 m
You'll find 3 stonecircles and 2 labyrinths in the area as well :)
What are some specific locations we can look up (Google)? Would help a lot! :P
@@Rarez2 Google provide very little of whats to see there. Barerly found any good pictures from it. Had to lurk until i found a PDF file with some pictures. Google maps, you wont see anything i believe. There is snow on the mountain on the satelite foto
However there are some pics, if you search "Blåskjæringen stones" or "Blåskjæringen steiner" you might find some pictures from that particular place.
If you want better pics you should look for a PDF file from NTNU (Norwegian technical university for science) called "Gåtefulle steinar i fjella" :) At some of the first sites there should be an article about different places with these stones.
2) In college I decided to go out of body to Stonehenge. My family from Scotland are Spiritualist. So I knew I could get to that time period out of body. I was looking for how to do levitation also. I knew I would see Space Ships, and stones floating. I went with Angels, landed right next to behind the Veil of the Space Ship. I saw a little alien running under the ship. I didn't know they could run, usually the just walk. I saw some large 7 to 8 feet tall brown haired humans fighting hand to hand close by no weapons. Wow I thought look, no illness. No polio, no Spanish Flu, no Plagues. The most healthy humans I have ever seen. They had brown hair and were tan living outside all the time. They wore little rabbits furs here and there. Non of it could have made them warmer. I asked the little Alien " What are the humans doing?". He looked at me, like darn another out of body. And then he shrugged his shoulders. Like who ever knows what humans are doing? I thought. Just when aliens land, humans will be so busy fighting other humans!! Sounds crazy. Just then I saw a tall outer row stone floating 3 feet off the ground. I looked around thinking yes I am a human you can watch me look under the rock, over the rock, and at the front and back. Nothing is visible moving this Rock. I don't care if I embarrass myself looking or not.
thanks for sharing:
i dont know if you had your oobe at stonehenge, but it is a ufo hotspot. connecting psychically to stonehenge is probably what it's designed for. I believe there's an electromagnetic portal above the stones: ufos and crop circles are seen here because it is a "portal gateway".
From the research I've done, stonehenge (in human terms) was (and maybe still is) a site of healing (people would make pilgrimages to the site to be healed)- and this happened for 1000s of years. So, when you say: "the most healthy humans I've ever seen" - that actually ties in with the site's real purpose. (I dont believe it was just a calendar).
it's not crazy at all to say "humans fight other humans", because humans are like this. unless we (humans) become peaceful and conquer our fears, the ETs are never gonna land here (in my view): its not just about them... its about us.
peace. thanks for reading.
wow Disney world at it's best
More proof of a force fed preconceived notion. WOW!
reminiscent of what you call RESEARCH lost mind history channel :)
Modern day Stonehedge is completely fake and was reconstructed in 1919 and the 1950s. There are extensive photographs of this, including concrete mixer. Watch this video ua-cam.com/video/5TJOkR6lAaA/v-deo.html
If monkeys banging sticks together accomplished moving tens of tons worth of stones hundreds of miles, I'd have similar awe for monkeys.
Simple just a disinformation agent, nothing to see here. This place is a digital simulation.
@@Rarez2 it's not there anymore
I was surprised to see people walking in amongst the stones, because when I was there a few years back it was completely fenced in and it was pouring. We got drenched, but nice to have experienced the famous Stonehenge all the same.
The Mystery continues as to the Original Purpose of those Stones, i don't believe it was Ice that pushed them to that location.
Absolutely not ice that pushed them there, if the silly academics can prove something stupid like that I'll start believe in santa clause.
If their theory were to be true would we not see plenty of other examples of this particular stone in and around this area? Smh
It doesn't seem to add up and is simply a theory without any basis in my opinion. We would see the evidence of this scattered amoungst the region. Without that evidence I cannot see how such a theory could hold...
watch randall Carlson on Stonehenge....
In Norway we have "forests" of stone on some mountains, that barerly anyone knows about. Archeologist dont know what it is and dont talk about it- at all! There is also special stonecircles there and also labyrinth-figures in the area. Some stones with holes in the middle. Biggest is 3 m tall.
As many as 6 different places with these (looking like forests of stones when you arrive).
I love ur channel Brien! Being so interested in ancient mystery and lost knowledge, your channel really quenches my thirst! Keep doing what you do and maintain your health so we can keep getting this awesome info for many many years to come! #FanfromSt.Louis
I've been to Stonehenge, but unfortunately wasn't able to go inside. It is mind blowing from a distance, but seeing people standing beside the stones gives me a whole new appreciation for it. Truly amazing.
It’s not far from where I live, but it took me 59 years to get around to visiting it........magical place. The circle at Avebury is pretty spectacular as well.
It would be interesting to see more information about this site before the "restoration".
Yet like most of our history, the true story is lost and we are left with a re-creation.
@@freshrot420 The glaciers wiped everything clean just 10 thousand years ago. A lot of stuff much older than that is already recycled in the magma except for places here and there. We're going to have a really hard time figuring out what actually happened.
@@freshrot420 Rubbish. There is a fuck ton of historical recordings on Stonehenge, some dating back to Medieval times, in the form of drawings, painting, prints as well as the written word. For example, Thomas Hearne’s 1779 Antiquities of Great Britain has an engraving of Stonehenge showing signs of disrepair and Flemish painter, Lucas de Heere, made a topographical watercolour of the monument, detailing the mortise and tenons of the lintels and the earth ditch, dating from circa 1573.
Here is a website dedicated to artwork dated from the early-mid 18th Century to the present day, all depicting Stonehenge as we see it today.
artuk.org/discover/stories/stonehenge-in-art
That really sucks that they rebuilt it and covered it with concrete. No wonder they don't allow most people past the barrier. They don't want people to see that they're trying to rewrite history. When my daughter lived in London in 2006, we went there and couldn't get past the barrier, but I did get to talk to one of the crows on one of the standing stones on the outer perimeter, lol. He didn't fly away. He just stayed there and looked at me the entire time and acted like he understood every word I said. So yeah, I know I'm crazy. I just like crows.
srvntlilly
Crows are one of my favorite of the flying beings..the one that you spoke with probably has ancient knowledge passed down from his ancestors, but we humans don't have the wisdom or ability to learn his language.
Jeremy Kirkpatrick
You seem angry...why the personal attack?
@Jeremy Kirkpatrick it's a joke
@@vegansaxon3962 It wasn't personal, Jeremy is just angry because he can't spell
They didn't rebuild it, it was just repaired. Some stones were falling over and it was feared that a stone might fall onto a visitor. The ones that had fallen were replaced in the original holes and were set in concrete to prevent them falling again.
As for the barriers, it's to prevent graffiti and damage to the ground.
last time I was there (after glastonbury festival about 15+ years ago (shit time flies, time for a revisit) we weren't allowed to be with in 20+ (50?) feet of the stones... good to see you can walk through them now
Great work Brien. Your guide was amazing. Thank you for the information.
I was thinking while looking at the stones.
"These stones remind me of the massive damage other stones around the world saw at the 12,000 years ago mark.."
Wish I could see them polished and shining in the sun on solstice!
Thanks Brien for All the Hard Work in Researching these Mysterious places and Artifacts💯✌️
Do we have any "old world" accounts or depictions of Stonehenge? Would be nice to see what it was like before modernists messed with it.
I believe that the Romans never mentioned Stone Henge.
Neither any other document before the 1900...
The best source is "Stonehenge, A Temple Restor'd to the British Druids" by William Stukeley [1740]. Original copies do surface for sale now and again. Online copies can be found. Harvard has a copy at iiif.lib.harvard.edu/manifests/view/drs:46626364$152i
The first credible mention of Stonehenge dates to c.50-BC, by Roman chronicler Diodorus Siculus in his descriptions of 'Hyperborea', the Roman name for Britannia.
It is mentioned several times in the 11th century, with some crude depictions. It is included in the Domesday Bok.
Geoffrey of Monmouth concocted a fanciful creation tale of the stones in the 12th century, and how Merlin raised them by 'Art Majick'.
It is widely mentioned from the 13th century onward, with increasingly accurate depictions.
It has been seriously studied from at least the 16th century by many of those eras notable scientists. Stuckeley, Aubrey, Jones, to name just 3.
It has never been moved, nor has it been added to or subtracted from. It has had some restoration work done, but only two fallen stones have been re-raised. Several others have been straightened, and yes, there is concrete at the base of these re-seated stones.
1) This is cool. When I was in high school my mother showed me a picture of Stonehenge. She asked me what I thought about it. I said it is a dry dock for space ships. I had a very Ancient life so I remembered all the large grey ships all over the UK. Humans had ships in the Ocean. The Space ships were so normal over land that if they were gone we would have gotten scared if they disappeared.
Didn't they rebuild it in early 1900s..
50’s I believe.
Yeah, makes it hard to believe there's any authenticity to the site.
Peter Müller Yes there is a few video's on it.. Saying it was actually built in 1954.. Showing large Crain's lifting and placing the stones.. So they definitely did some kind of work on it..
Wikipedia claims 1920s
I feel same way , might as well be fake
Stonehenge was built in 1954. There are original pictures of the building process. No wander it has all the measurements of Earth and North and South and stuff. It was built around 100 years ago with modern mans machinery. There is one of the stones that shows the concrete underneath the fake stone cover. Watch it your self: ua-cam.com/video/8aCFppygoCw/v-deo.html
2010invent nah dude history shows them being there for thousands of years but it did get rebuilt less than 100 years ago
So when they "rebuilt" it and changed the layout of it. That makes all those "Uuuu feelings and o look it lines up with the sun and stuff all FAKE. We have no idea how it was laid out originally before the "reconstruction" And now we have people who go to those stones and can talk to the ancestors 5000 years back. RIGHTTTTT. And they make money off of it. Just like this lady!
Why can't people except the fact that it's fake..
IT WAS REPAIRED BACK THEN NOT BUILT BACK THEN !!!!LOL
2010invent I tried to load your link and it doesn’t work!!! FYI next...
for anyone wanting to visit Stonehenge, get up early on a nice day and be there at opening time. Without the hordes of people it's fantastic. We went via the Avebury stone circle too, 8am at Avebury with the mist floating around the ancient stones, wow.
When I reached the top of the hill in sight of Stonehenge ... I thought: what incredible MACHINE...
Would love to have the sound reworked so we could actually hear clearly what was being said. Just learned from comments that the thing was reworked in the 1950' s! That changes everything for me. I'd have to see before and after photos to believe any relevancy now! Can check this off my bucket list until further proof of anything! Thanks though!
Its easy enough to hear and understand.
Ever thought of getting your hearing checked?
Thank you Brien. I could never afford to go to these places but you make me feel like I was there. 😘
Thank you Brien Foerster for your excellent research on Stonehenge. I found out a lot today. You do an excellent job of finding the real age of these stones, and where they originated from. Thank you.
Thank you Brian! And no problem with the Audio I think the wind adds an element of dramatic effect! :-)
If it's 12,000 years old, doesn't that coincide with other megalithic structures like in puma punku, easter island etc? And didn't sea levels rise rapidly around that time, suggesting a melting of a mini ice age and flood? Correct me if i'm wrong, just trying to piece these structures and destructions together
Kurtis Gobekli Tepe is another 12 thousand year old site in Turkey the discovered fairly recently.
Similar to Stonehenge but far more extensive.
Supposedly buried on purpose for some reason...
Maybe the flood..?
younger dryas what also happened around the time
I've seen the pictures with the cranes and so on.
May be they are fake because the engllish could not swallow not having an important megalith. Just like the Piltdown man.
yeah same with machu picchu in peru and the pyramid of egypt, And they just recently discovered of what could been an asteroid hitting the earth around 12,00 years ago located at greenland. All the the dots seems to slowly connecting right now. all of these sophisticated structures are just so impossible to built with primitive people 4,500 years ago. There must be an advance human civilization that existed before us 12,000 years ago!
"A massive crater hides beneath Greenland’s ice ,The discovery could breathe new life into a controversial hypothesis that suggests that an impact about 13,000 years ago triggered a mysterious 1,000-year cold snap known as the Younger Dryas " www.sciencenews.org/article/impact-crater-greenland-asteroid-younger-dryas
Very grateful to you for publishing these experiences so that we can also...
Ah the good old beaker people. That brings me back to the days when I spent hours digging in the dirt in cold wet weather to find tiny shards of their pottery.
You were even treated to some real, live English weather. Just to make the experience more authentic.
Thanks to Maria for sharing those interesting facts.
Here Now. Real weather fake Stonehenge
@@BAZZAROU812 - Fake ? as in significantly re positioned ?
@@herenow2895 no they weren't. Any stone that was removed during the restorations were put back in exactly the same place.
@@alloneword7427 - I was asking a question. Not making a statement.
@@herenow2895 and I answered your question. Your question...."Fake ? as in significantly re positioned ?". My answer...."no they weren't.".
thanks Mr. Foester, for your "work"! You lead an exciting life, WoW !
Obviously it's a burial ,astronomical observation clock and was celebrated for life and death and seasonal celebrations for agriculture.
Thank You for posting Brian. I Love Your Videos. May the Love and Light be With You.
I live in the UK and have been to stonehenge many times...it is FAR older than we are told by many thousands of years ...and just the shaping and construction leaves no other explanation than lost ancient high technology. Remember, we are told that this was built when we were no more than rolling around in the mud evolution wise ??...Peace.
3:00>79’20” x100=diameter of Earth in miles ? Wouldn’t it be 80.66’ x 100=806.6 miles x 10= 8066 miles , whereas, equatorial diameter =7926 miles
Stonhenge was "refurbished" in the late 30's and the restorer's vision of what he thought it should look like incorporated . Its easily confirmed . Truly amazing listening to this young lady recite her speel lol .
That shot with the birds 1:23, good timing!!
But were they African or European swallows?
@@CGPacifica A king would know these things!
Really amazing sacred geometry happens here. It's like the maths, the spiritualism and some non specialist tool methods got passed around from Egypt or Peru but not the methods to make the tools to finely hone the stone.
Apparently the heel stone has tilted exactly the amount and direction of procession so that it still lines up perfectly. I think it's given as 0.5 degrees.
Absolutely astonishing. I did not know about the polishing at all. which really begs the question when positioning these in the first place (not counting the repositioning in the last century) we'd have to have this polishing in mind. I think one day we'll find that there's much more to the Bronze Age then we realize and even more so it's the ages that came before.
It's my personal belief that mankind has gone through this cycle of either surviving natural disasters or self-inflicted Falls that have created multiple resets of human civilization.
Thank you Brien...we're digging out of the dark,into the light!!!
Glaciers that covered Wales in the Pleistocene Epoch, brought massive amounts of the underlying bedrock over, finally depositing its load over SW England so there was never any need to transport big stones over great distance.
Why does every single ruin have to be for rituals, the constellations, mathematical equations etc. etc.Why couldn't Stonehenge be a fortress of some sort ,an important meeting place, everything has some grand hidden meaning???
Yes, they always seem to want to turn everything into a calendar! It may not have been used for that purpose at all. We will likely never know the purpose of Stonehenge, after all none of us were there when it was built. It's like the Egyptian pyramids...they like to claim that they were tombs, yet no mummies were ever found inside them. Academic dogma dies hard.
One could ask why you think anything has to have had a mundane purpose instead. I've seen many make this types of comments, the underlying idea being this civilization must have been similar to ours, and in our time it is indeed the case that we spend a lot of effort building things that have no actual value whatsoever. This is the type of civilization you want to glorify, and project on those ancient cultures as well?
It's almost as if some people have to stress what is most trivial and mundane in an effort to deny anything of a more transcendent nature, which is a reflection of the spirit of the age we live in indeed.
A wind screen on your microphone (if applicable) would be nice for the audio. Thanks for your hard work creating this videos.
I have a booklet dated 1929 witch gives some of the history of the place .inside is a picture taken of the stones in 1893 .there's also a plan of the area showing standing stones of witch there are 23 .all others fallen.
There are 2 alternative versions of this construction. (1) In the Norse regions, they had the annual "ting." the gathering of the peoples, like a public fair (state fair) and a judicial court. All legal actions, marrige, dowries, fights, feuds, big sales, etc would be handled at the gathering. It is entirely possible that this was the British "ting" of its time. (2) With the actual dating of the Stonehenge into Era-3, there is the statement that this was a UFO landing support edifice. Other interpretations, that there are also other henges in the same area, ... and with wattle-and-daub wood and stucco inbetween the stones and the ceiling closed in and covered, it would make a very excellent warm communal large family housing area, with a central fire, ... or (like modern era ice houses) it could be a fridge larder and root cellar for the community, with ice/packed snow put around the side walls for insulation.
Thank You Brien, I thought I knew a little about Stonehedge but so much more to know. And of course this is what you do and have created so much more than the mainstream or fakestream as I call it. I am learning and thinking with each one or your videos. Many Thanks Brien! Love, Light and Peace! Daveyjo in Pennsylvania
I have my own "Foerster" playlist folder on here dedicated to your videos!
Never seen the stone at 5:52 up so close before! One can clearly see that it looks like it was once soft and shaped with a spatula
LOL No. Not at all.
Really interesting video once again Brien!! More pieces added to that giant puzzle we call 'History' Thank you! Much Respect my friend! ✌🏽
Brien,you mentioned in your vids earlier no C-14 carbon dating can be obtained from non-organic material.
Then how would they have achieved it at Stonehenge?
Brian any chance you could look at newgrange in county Meath in Ireland? It was apparently built about 5000 years ago which predates phase one of Stonehenge by about 1000 years and the pyramids but 400-500 years, it has huge stones at its base and the roof is corbelled and has never let any water inside the chamber, it also has a roof box over the entrance which aligns with the sunrise on the winter solstice and it lights up the whole chamber inside. I've had a trip and its a really cool place but with all the stuff you do maybe you can get some new info
I watched a Druid wedding at the summer solstice, what an amazing place
at 2:52 min
the really stunning part is that the ancient builders already knew exactly about the mile and the feet as they are used today in Britain.
Oh, boy...
I think Stonehenge is much older than the official version, when you consider most of the original damage was the Atlantic side of the monument looking like it had been hit by a tsunami one has to wonder if it was damaged during the great flood.
I have been studying Stonehenge for 47 years - it is a ruin of a Magnificent Building!
@kevin m to mark the lunar and solar calendar.
@kevin m to celebrate the winter and summer solstice. These were very important things back then. They marked the time of year for growing food, harvesting etc etc There would have also been various religious beliefs associated with the Sun and Moon.
I got a big question never ever asked about Stone Hedge Mr B Foster?
What kind of force is needed to release the horizontal Stone's which lay on top.??
Was this a lame excuse for vandalism?
Was this maybe a huge title wave.?
She didn't even mention all the wood pillars that were in place or how the scenery was laden with Forrest and how many more henges there are in the area.
Sorry for my inadequate English. During the last 2.6 million years, there has been at least 30 peroids of glaciers. Glaciers create tremendous power, and did all the hard work to move the stones to the site. The ancient people wasn't that stupid, they didn't transported the heavy rocks all the way from Wales. I know the TV-program "Drain the Ocean." Is it possible to drain the soil all the way down to the bed rock? Is it possible, what do we find? My guess: A large number of stones similar to those in Stonehenge, at the site, or nearby. "But if the glaciers did the transport, why isn't there some stones left on the ground? People could smash the big stones to smaller pieces and use then to other things, or the ancient people planned the construction of the number of stones they found at the site.
The masculine stone on the right at the beginning has what looks like a scoop taken out... like it was as soft as ice cream once.....! Noticed this on many megalithic stone, such as the stone boxes in Egypt, this was done to take out the cracks to keep the integrity of the stone... but for what function ??????
Fascinating. Is she saying it's dated to the Younger Dryas time (12,800 BC)? Or before or after? I would like to see a computer animation of Stonehenge with the different colors she's talking about.
Ive seen pictures of heavy equipment building Stonehenge! Its a fraud!
@Jeremy Kirkpatrick
Did you research the video he spoke of or are you offended someone did more research than you?
Stonehenge's authenticity and original stone arrangement has been moved in the past. Like a compromised crime scene.
Next time Jeremy.. Slow down on your insults. You totally jumped the gun. Since you are familiar with Stonehenge.. Please post the link to the video showing Stonehenge being raped. I can post the video, but i want to see if you are full of shit first.
It's not hidden information that the fallen stones were lifted and set where they believed they were originally. That in no way makes Stonehenge a hoax or a twentieth century construct.
@@dysonsquared
Reconstructed means not original.
Plus.. Did the druids use steal beams 4 thousand years ago? How about concrete? Should they tear apart the pyramids and rebuild them? Would they be authentic?
Not everyone knows Stonehenge was pulled apart, rebuilt and had complete stones made of concrete and steal.
Stonehenge is not what you think it is and has been raped of its origins. Like legos.
You are correct.. There is a video showing them rebuilding it in 1950s.. It's all a sham.. Completely fake..
@Dave Wallace pardon me... Yes there are steel beams inside a concrete shell. No stone..no "steal". Spelling and grammar nazis have nothing else to contribute except barking like a dog. Stonehenge is a contaminated crime scene, It has no historical value.
Fact #LAST: Stonehenge was found broken, then moved and rebuilt in a nearby location.
Thank you so much for this video, Brien!
Hi, can i use sm visuals from this video to make and educational video about stonehenge?
Great video quality.. Feel like I'm standing right next to it.
Great video , thankyou Brien, I have learned a little more about this "wonder" ..
As with most history, pick what you want others to believe and disregard or destroy the rest. Or partly here, change it to match you own ideas of history, thus changing history.
I read that the people who built Stonehenge we're from the Holy Land descendants of the biblical King Hezekiah. Or they took part in the construction with the local population of England. Edgar Cayce.
If it used to be polished a sort of blue then why all the corrosion? Is that a product of water damage or just simply old age?
Maria speaks about that place as if she is 100% certain of the bullshit she saying it all sound great but keep it 💯% nobody knows anything about the ancient past .
At 6:24, the crack at the bottom of the stone lets us see different material from the inside of the stone. The tour guide Maria should have said something about it but she chose not to say anything. Why?
stone henge was actually rebuilt for the first time in 1901 then again in 1919 and then again in 1958 by the british government plus every body needs to watch the code by carl munck
oringinally much larger , stone henge was 'a hall of mirrors area where humans and animals were thrown into the mix" back when renegade bad aliens not the good ones ruled earth,Martian connections-author lou baldin/baldini
LOL
you think the good ones are ruling us now?
ok sounds reasonable. one question tho, which gods would you consider "good" who still have a say here on earth?
i do not agree with "in the west we are mostly tested with integrity and attitude", we are also tested by karma/punishment like the rest. i also do not really understand what you mean by integrity and attitude.
@@koloblicin we don't know the "good"gods names, they allow bad aliens to dole out karma for limited privileges. Our guides have a sayand they can change over a lifetime. Yes Integrity/attitude leads to karma for us in the west also- "that's how the universe works" Integrity is trying to do the right thing all the time and a good attitude ie no evny and hate. That's what we're judged on in dreams and final judgement.See "weighing of the heart" ancient Egypt carvings on google images or "separating the wheat from the chaff" - a saying from fictional bible. Another picture is Earth is a cow manure field and they're waiting for turd blooms.. A school of hard knocks, it's better towards center of this galaxy. No big bang theory here's where the dirt under your feet come from- From the good aliens- the Earth was spat out from the Sun like popcorn from kettle-Ancient Egyptians know everything came from Sun and I've more proof plus this...ua-cam.com/video/rrm3JiRe-nE/v-deo.html
@@koloblicin Hey Kolo I replied twice to you today, further, bad aliens are off the reincarnation wheel (not being tested). Again we in the west are tested being put through the finer points of integrity usually, and usually in the 3rd world they die at very young age so no/little testing/no learning just punishment- Their next lives are often better. As I said karma/reincarnation explain it all, it's what most in the world believe in. Many stories of reincarnation also on youtube. Sometimes when UFOs capture bad aliens they show the negative/renegade limited options or none and agree to a new starting pointing for it, taking many lifetimes. Here's 100 UFOs in 1 min mostly at start of clip, look for electric balls of light, cleverly filmed by the author I mentioned above, I've filmed them kind of the same way many times- ps taking questions on Pyramids- Mars/souls if you please. ua-cam.com/users/results?search_query=sun+2+lou+baldin
Brien, you have such a great life. I bet the stubborn academics will be raging over those claims, they're currently grabbing their pitchforks.
What type of camera and mount do you use to get such high quality video?
Reminds me of pillers in the basement of a ruined multi storied building....bit like osyrian temple in egypt
Can you get Marie to talk about the black and white pictures in 1954, it looks like they rebuilt it?
It wasn't rebuilt, it was restored. There were large stones that had fallen so were put back, and some were leaning dangerously. They were removed and then the area was excavated. Bone fragments, pottery etc was found and then the stone were put back where they were. Some were put in concrete in the ground to keep them safe and upright.
I enjoy your videos Brian, and I know you did apologize before the video started. However, you have been doing this long enough surely to at least have a fluffy mic cover for just such occasions? Can't recall the lady's name just now but she was telling us some fascinating stuff about our stones. I have communed there at solstice and it is a wondrous, powerful place. Going to see if your guide has a channel or whatnot where I can hear more.
Thanks for all of your films of your travels around the World Brian. You're doing great. Just get a muffler for Gaia's sake.
Plus, I'd happily show you some special parts of the UK that would suit your tours. Just say.
There is a alignment of london, stonehenge, boston, ny, phili, dc
There is a wonderful invention designed to reduce wind noise when placed over a microphone. You might want to investigate that.
Brian, the entire site was re-erected, starting in 1919..... what you are seeing is a recreation. Much concrete, lead seals to hold the cap stones..... NOT a one of them were erect. Most were flat down on the ground... and some were so slanted ready to fall Churchill was afraid to walk next to them during his visit to the site.
I can't believe Brian didn't say come on lady we all know this was built in 1954 and they used cranes.
Is that a reference to something I'm missing?
Stone henge was built in 1954. Check it out on UA-cam
Woow. Can someone do a 3D model according to the polished color stones and more accurate position of the stones?
Brien Foerster! I keep hearing there is a bigger and more well-preserved version of Stonehenge,
in the Louisiana Valley in The United States. Would you consider investigating that?
It's nothing like Stonehenge. It's large earth mound, not a stone henge. It's called Poverty Point I think.
Had a hard time visualizing the scale to get an idea for the cap (top) stones, and I'm 56 years old. I just recently got a true scale for the first time of the GTEAT PYRAMID. CONCLUSION:
HUMAN BEINGS COULD NOT HAVE BUILT THEM. IT WAS THE GLORIOUS SON'S OF GOD OF THE BIBLE, AND THEY'RE BACK. YOU WILL FIND THEM, IN THE BOOKS OF:
GENESIS
JOB
EZEKIEL
REVELATION
THESE ARE THE BOOKS I KNOW OF. HOW DID I COME TO THIS CONCLUSION? EASY REALLY. JUST PUT SCIENCE AND RELIGION TOGETHER, HAND IN HAND, LIKE IT SHOULD BE. MYSTERY SOLVED.
you're an idiot. People have done the same thing by raising stones like this since to show how it was done. It was man made, fact.
At 00:57, the bottom of one of the stones has crumbled and might have disclosed some truth in building the stones. The lady should talk about it. The cameraman should have shot longer closeups.
What about the pictures that are floating around of Stonehenge being restored? Rebuilt? In the 60s? Whit cranes mortar etc
How on earth can you use carbon dating to show it’s 12000 years old? Impossible as there’s no organic material left. Archeological , ground radar, and aerial surveys are revealing that the site is really huge and what we see today is just a small part of a much much bigger arrangement. Totally amazing place that I’ve visited many times and glad that it’s more accessible now, with a visitor centre and reconstruction of a village. I remember when you just parked the car off the main road and walked up to it , but then vandals kept painting graffiti on the stones and it was fenced off. It’s interesting to think that Stonehenge was being built at around the same time as the pyramids in Egypt. Very different technology but both connected to celestial worship. Orion for the Egyptians and the sun and moon for the ‘hengers’. History is truly wonderful.
Yeah history is wonderful. But your take on the limitations of carbon dating is not so wonderful. FYI it is useful to 50 thousand years. The half life of carbon 14 is 5730 years, and can be measured over many half life cycles before it is almost entirely decayed into Nitrogen 12. This is a well know fact.
@@mycofairbanks3321 - You miss the point. It's not about the dating technique, it's about what is being tested. It's stone.
@@Pitman33 Why you are pretty smart aren't you? But the point you missed is this. They don't carbon date the stone, but the organic substances on it. If the organic substances show a carbon 14 date of 12,000 years, that would mean that the stones were polished prior to that age. And 12,000 years is well within the limits of carbon 14 dating.
@@mycofairbanks3321 - |What organic substances? lol
@@Pitman33 Well for starters... fungus, bird and bug shit, diatoms...etc. Do you actually thing the rocks have remained sterile for several thousand years? There are organic substances covering the earth, in the water, in the dirt, it's everywhere. Unlikely there is no substances of organic organic embedded within the texture of the stones. If you think so, that is your prerogative. I am not a believer.
BTW they are not dating the rocks. They are dating the construction, of which there are other clues like the ones I am speaking of here.
Thank you Brien, Fascinating, extremely interesting stuff.
You can't carbon-14 date rocks, typically. I'm not memorized by the establishment or academia or anything in particular, and I also suspect that there were ancient advanced humans beyond what we currently accept, but to substantiate findings and strengthen your story, you need to incorporate adequate knowledge of basic physics, including radioactive decay.
Any magnetic anomalies? Any ringing/ metallic sounds when hitting stones? (Did you see the video in south america where they hit a random stone that rings like a bell?) What if you polish megalithic stones around the world.. do they also have specific colours? 😁
Interesting stuff but at 7:20 I heard something bizarre cause according to Graham Hancock nothing but organic material can be dated through the C14-method.
Thank you for sharing your knowledge with us!
Thanks Brien...thoroughly satisfied..
You need a fluffy mic muff for windy days, Brien.
Maybe Stonehenge has more significance then first thought. It looks a bit like a crude version of gobekli tepe.. and like other circles with T shaped pillars. Wouldn't surprise me if the original Stonehenge had T shaped pillars like the other great archaeological sites like on Menorca.
They don't know, nearly all guesswork.
It's great how they nearly all fail to point out the stone that has granite inside, they try to tell us that this was placed inside for support... Give me a break.
Its funny how she talks of cement, because it looks like the stones have indeed had cement poured over them.
P.S I have uploaded lots of photos of the henge on my channel if you fancy a look.
I understand how radiocarbon dating works, but I know it is not accurate every time they use it.
Great video! Thanks!
These stones were seats for giants.
Stonehenge was build as a 'machine to keep the Earth in balance'. All the megalithic buildings, all over the globe, in wich the sun is shining on the summer - or winter solstice or the equinoxes are machines with the same purpose, to keep the earth in balance. In many myth the story of an earth out of balance is the most importance subject. In some stories the world even turnes upside down. Ofcourse people got afraid and did want to get a grip on it with rituals. Thats why they build this structures in wich they performed the rituals on that specific data. So it is not the sun that was warshipped, but the stabilety of the rotating earth-globe. That is my opinion after many years of studying the archaeological data on this and myth on this subject, and ofcourse our solar system.