2 MONTHS WITH THE TAMRON 17-70MM F2.8 | SONY A6000, A6100, A6300, A6400, A6500, A6600

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 гру 2024
  • For my other lens reviews:
    Sigma 56mm f1.4 review - • SIGMA 56MM - DEFINITEL...
    Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 review - • TAMRON 17-70 | ONE OF ...
    Sigma 16mm f1.4 review - • 5 REASONS WHY THE SIGM...
    Sigma 30mm f1.4 review - • 5 REASONS WHY THE SIGM...
    Viltrox 85mm f1.8 review - • 5 REASONS WHY THE VILT...
    Meike 35 vs Sigma 30 - • BATTLE OF F1.4 LENSES ...
    Sigma 16 vs Sigma 30 - • 2021 BATTLE OF SIGMAS ...
    Meike 35mm f1.4 review - • 5 THINGS YOU SHOULD KN...
    Sony 18-105mm f4 review - • 5 REASONS WHY THE SONY...
    Follow me also on my socials:
    Facebook - / danboxingph
    Instagram - ...
    UA-cam - / @danboxingph
    #roadto1k #letsgo #letsdothis #lens #review #video #sony #mirrorless #apsc #camera #tech #gadget #philippines

КОМЕНТАРІ • 151

  • @DanboxingPH
    @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +4

    TIMESTAMPS FOR YOU ALL 📦
    0:13 - Studio set up
    1:17 - “Road to 1K Subs!”
    1:57 - Danboxing Intro
    2:09 - Video Foundation
    3:07 - Tamron 17-70 for photography
    4:41 - Tamron 17-70 for videography
    6:50 - Tamron 17-70 room for improvements
    7:39 - Conclusion
    8:13 - Outro
    8:51 - “Special Message”
    9:25 - Bloopers
    #roadto1k

    • @bharatdrishyam2186
      @bharatdrishyam2186 3 роки тому

      Sir which is best 17-70 tamron vs sony 18-105. Video all-rounder. Or any other lens? Suggest

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      I’d say the Tamron 17-70 :)
      Here’s my review of that ua-cam.com/video/Lp71c24Gd7c/v-deo.html

  • @kuljeetkumar4657
    @kuljeetkumar4657 3 роки тому +6

    Wtf is wrong with youtube algorithm man, this guy produces marvelous videos. This kind of stuff should be on top when searched for .

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Hey, man! Just saw this now.
      Wanna say thank you very much. I’m hopeful for that. But in the meantime, these words will forever mean a lot.

  • @Sairo9
    @Sairo9 3 роки тому +2

    Subscribed since 500!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Ey, Sairo! Thank you so much 🔥📦💯

  • @rockchalkbach
    @rockchalkbach 3 роки тому +1

    I bought the Tamron with high hopes of replacing my 18-105 and a couple of the Sigma primes. After a week with it I found myself unsatisfied. The 18-105 with its internal focus and power zoom is much better for gimbal work. That point I could get past. What really ruined it for me was picture clarity. Pictures taken during a golden hour photo shoot were consistently soft at every focal length. Night and day difference compared to the Sigmas. I’m hoping I just got a bad unit. I want to minimize my kit and the Tamron is so versatile! I may try again later down the road.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Hi, Caleb.
      Were you able to consult the store you bought it from? Coz there was a same concern before about the image sharpness and he had it replaced. Turned out that that particular unit should have not released.
      You might want to double check. As far as my experience with this lens is concern, it’s tack sharp. Not so at higher focal lenghts.

  • @romvil
    @romvil 3 роки тому +2

    I have seen a few of your videos and I have to commend you on a job well done. Informative, entertaining, and practical without being overly technical.
    Regarding the focal length of the Sony 18-105mm f4 compared to the Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 with VC -- while the Sony 18-105 obviously has a longer reach compared to the Tamron 17-70mm, the Sony has two clear disadvantages:
    - "softness" in some use case scenarios
    - minimum focus distance
    Since the a6000 series camera bodies have Clear Image Zoom, would you say using this feature can offset the shorter reach of the Tamron 17-70 mm lens? Otherwise, in almost all respects, (outside of build quality, weight, and gimbal-friendliness (lens doesn't protrude when zooming)), the Tamron appears to be the clear winner.
    Congratulations in reaching the 1K subscriber mark!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Thanks, Rom! Appreciate that. 🔥
      Wow, I actually said the same things in my other video - I directly compare the two (ua-cam.com/video/Lp71c24Gd7c/v-deo.html). Super agree with you. 👌🏽

    • @romvil
      @romvil 3 роки тому

      @@DanboxingPH You know what they say about great minds... 😀

  • @MarcoMars
    @MarcoMars 2 роки тому

    nice review bro! been looking for a pinoy owning this lens! hope I can try this out sa a6400 soon!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 роки тому

      Hey, man. Thanks so much! A must have lens for aps-c in my opinion. Haha

    • @MarcoMars
      @MarcoMars 2 роки тому

      Tara hang out!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 роки тому

      Tara tara!! Tiga saan ka, bro?

    • @MarcoMars
      @MarcoMars 2 роки тому

      @@DanboxingPH ​ @Danboxing PH taga cavite ako broo ikaw?? PM!! ano fb mo?

  • @ryanocop8788
    @ryanocop8788 3 роки тому +2

    I watched the video 2x Bro, and I agree with the other comments that the intro is too long. Knowing you, Im sure that you will do something to improve that. I love the use of language, hindi sya ganoon ka lalim at ganoon ka technical for us viewers to google the meaning. I suggest na mag hire ka ng hmua para sa pawis and oil sa face. Overall ganda ng content.happy 1k subs😊

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Salamat, brother!!! Yeah, improve natin yan :)
      HMUA? Wag muna siguro. Punas punas nalang muna HAHAHA
      Salamat salamat!!! 🔥

  • @Ryansacrobat
    @Ryansacrobat 3 роки тому

    How would you compare this vs. the Sony 16-55 2.8? Better or worse? The $600 price difference definitely makes me think twice but is the value in the Sony??

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Can’t speak much since I haven’t tried the Sony 16-55. But I’d always pick this for two main reasons:
      1. Additional focal range
      2. In-lens stabilization

  • @AJVLlaxus90
    @AJVLlaxus90 3 роки тому +1

    Hi Dan..nice video i want to ask is the aperutr is constant at f2.8 when we zoom to 70mm?TQ

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks, man!
      Yup! Constant 2.8 at all focal lengths. Even at 70mm.

  • @fitgoatee3336
    @fitgoatee3336 3 роки тому

    hahaha aabangan ko na lagi yung bloopers sa last scenes! kunti nalang 1k na! advance congrats Dan!

  • @Jacobe23
    @Jacobe23 8 місяців тому

    brother what picture profile/colour settings did you use haha? need to know! loving the videos.

  • @kielmusic2453
    @kielmusic2453 3 роки тому

    Quality has really improved since the last video of yours I watched. Excellent work! Thanks for the review.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Hey, man! Glad to hear this. Thank you very much :)

  • @Tips5
    @Tips5 Рік тому +1

    If i want to buy another lens with this lens. What do you advise me?

  • @ZietInvests
    @ZietInvests 3 роки тому

    Did you have to apply lens correction to fix the chromatic abberation at post?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      So far, I did it once. Not really a problem in my opinion. Most of the time, the vignetting is what I fix in post.

    • @ZietInvests
      @ZietInvests 3 роки тому

      @@DanboxingPH ah i see!

  • @mohamedjerish6420
    @mohamedjerish6420 3 роки тому +1

    Hi man.. subscribed😜
    Want to know how Tamron VC works for vedios? Better than oss 18-105?
    Tamron 17-70mm is easy to use gimbal?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Hey, man. Thank you for subscribing!!! Appreciate that :)
      About the VC, I mentioned in my first video (ua-cam.com/video/eBJ8rep8TVY/v-deo.html) that it’s as good as the OSS of the 18-105. In my opinion. Like it’s very very reliable so far.
      As for the compatibility with gimbals, the 18-105 for sure is the better option since it doesn’t extend even when zooming in. But this, Tamron lens, isn’t bad at all. Just take note of that.

    • @mohamedjerish6420
      @mohamedjerish6420 3 роки тому

      Thank you 👍🏻

  • @thesymbolized
    @thesymbolized 3 роки тому +2

    I am so so happy for you that you hit the 1k so fast. Absolutely well earned :)
    I found the intro here a bit long with the b roll shots... And i think the lens is not too expensive, considering what it is ☺️ still love the lens
    I love the takeouts haha keep it up 👍😂

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Sam!!! Thank you for being part of this journey 💯
      About the intro, apologies. That might be the result of over excitement HAHAHA
      Agree, I still believe it’s worth the price. Super useful for what it is 💯
      Thank youuuu 💯👌🏽😂

    • @thesymbolized
      @thesymbolized 3 роки тому +3

      @@DanboxingPH i hope the feedback was ok. The intro didn't annoy me, it was just a bit too long because I wanted to know about the lens hahahah
      And i also whish it would be 105.. if you ever find a lens that works as an addition with more Tele, i would love for you to let me know :)

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Yeah!!! Feedbacks are so welcomed! I even thank you for that 😊 will consider that in my next videos 👌🏽
      Right? Sure! Will let you know 😊

    • @thesymbolized
      @thesymbolized 3 роки тому +1

      @@DanboxingPH tamron has the 70-105 i think. It's also new but it's a fullframe lens... And i am not sure if it's the perfect fit.. and the 55-210 from sony is old and cheap but not too sharp and not too good in low light.. come on brands... We need more apsc lenses!!!!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Yeah! This is the only Tamron lens for APSC cameras :((
      Hahahaha agree! Come on, brands!!!!! 😂

  • @MarlonKingShow
    @MarlonKingShow 3 роки тому +3

    Thanks for the review update. Still looking at this as an update to my 18-105. Just trying to work out how much extra I would get from it to make it worth its value. All the best from UK.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Woah! You can’t go wrong with this lens, man! Go for it 🔥

  • @atatsatshuklafilms3731
    @atatsatshuklafilms3731 3 роки тому +1

    Bro i am still confused in Tamron 17-70 or sony 18-105 f4 and sigma 30 do you help me in this

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      I’d say go for Tamron 17-70 and one from the Sigma Trio :)

  • @cristhianramirez8247
    @cristhianramirez8247 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent videos with that practical approach!!!! That is we need!!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Thank you so much!!! Hope it helps :)

  • @singyangchai4469
    @singyangchai4469 2 роки тому

    Do you think Tamron 17-70 f2.8 is a major upgrade to my 18-105 f4 for still photography with a6400?

  • @NDavid94
    @NDavid94 3 роки тому +1

    Hey,
    Just a tip, when you are mounting a mic on a stand, it's a lot easier to hold the mic still and rotating the boom instead (first loosening its screw, obviously). It's not just faster, but you can also immediately adjust its angle as needed, which you can't really do if you are rotating the mic.
    Cheers

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Woah!! Thanks for this, David. 🔥

  • @jayllicampo97
    @jayllicampo97 2 роки тому +1

    Good video! Thank God we recently bought this lens instead of the Sony 18-105mm. Thank you bro, God bless you! 👍🏻🔥😊

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 роки тому

      Enjoy your new lens! Thank you!

  • @Jofranz
    @Jofranz 3 роки тому

    Just discovered your channel! Tanong lang pre, recording your audio and video thru the ipad?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Recording my audio using external mic connected directly to my camera.
      Recording my video using a mirrorless camera.
      Editing and mixing everything using my iPad.

  • @joebeck0
    @joebeck0 2 роки тому

    Torn if I should get this for my a6000 as an all around go to. I’ll be doing photos and video.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 роки тому

      Go for it. You’ll never go wrong with this lens!

  • @TonmoyGhosh
    @TonmoyGhosh 2 роки тому

    I’ve watch3d several videos on this lens and you covered some points not brought up by others. Thanks

  • @rj1107
    @rj1107 3 роки тому

    And also about the VC, do you think it helps a lot in videos? Or is it just doing a minimum job

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Bro, it helps big time!!! Really helpful. Like I said in the video, I don’t do handheld vlogging, but with this, I do now hahahaha

    • @rj1107
      @rj1107 3 роки тому

      @@DanboxingPH thank you thank you!!🙏

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      I forgot to share, I already made a video sharing how this lens’ VC performs - ua-cam.com/video/p3v5lak1laU/v-deo.html

  • @joseregalado1399
    @joseregalado1399 3 роки тому

    Another excellent review! Love it!!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Hey, man! Thank you very much 🔥

  • @p4ul.f708
    @p4ul.f708 2 роки тому

    Hey, thanks for this helpful review !👍
    I wonder - what do you think of the Sigma 18-50 ?
    Cause that would be 300€ cheaper here in my country, is lighter but has no image stabilization. 🤔

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 роки тому +1

      Thank you!
      I haven’t tried the Sigma but yes, having any form of stablization is an advantage. Especially if the camera body doesn’t have IBIS.

  • @dmzGFX
    @dmzGFX 2 роки тому

    hard to find this one, any idea where to get this lens?

  • @rissamayrox
    @rissamayrox 3 роки тому +4

    C'mon, Dan... I'm THIS close to buying this lens and if I do I'm contacting Tamron Philippines directly to tell them to give you some commission hahaha

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Ey!!!! Thank you for this, Marissa!!! This is super encouraging!!! I wish I wish hahaha 🔥💯🔥💯🔥

  • @cuorebiancorossoo
    @cuorebiancorossoo 3 роки тому

    Nice video! What do you think about Zeiss 16 35 vs this tamron? I have already 70 350 Sony...

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Both are great lenses given then both have in-lens stabilization as well. I just find the 17-70 focal range more generous 😊

  • @naMEsua
    @naMEsua 3 роки тому

    You helped me decide to get the RIGHT lens, then I watched your videos ever since. Today I subscribed (sorry it took that long hahaha) you deserved it!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Wow! This is so nice! Glad I was able to help you decide. :)
      Haha no worries! Thank you so much!

  • @nedmacfadden2833
    @nedmacfadden2833 3 роки тому

    Can you pull focus with this lens, is the manual focus linear?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Hey, man. Nope! In that situation, the Sony 16-50 is the better option.

  • @burhan2381
    @burhan2381 3 роки тому

    Just wanna ask sir. Is it necessary to recalibrate ur gimbal when changing the focal length on ur tamron?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Hello! Yes yes because it extends when zooming in.

    • @burhan2381
      @burhan2381 3 роки тому

      @@DanboxingPH oh, i see. Thank for ur reply sir, it helps a lot

  • @daxtercage8939
    @daxtercage8939 3 роки тому

    If i have the tamron 17-70mm f2.8, should i get the sigma 30 f1.4?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Hey Daxter. That would be a great combo for sure. Any of the Sigma Trio to be honest. It’s good to have one for extreme low lights situations. Me personally, I’m looking at Sigma 56mm to pair with my Tamron 17-70.
      You might want to check out my other video, Tamron 17-70 VS Sigma Trio. Let me know your thoughts:
      ua-cam.com/video/gpSOcSQmx0M/v-deo.html

  • @flol3266
    @flol3266 3 роки тому

    Does your lens also have a pretty loud rattle?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Hello, I’ve heard this issue before. Good thing I never experienced it.

    • @flol3266
      @flol3266 3 роки тому

      @@DanboxingPH so there is no Noise when you turn the lens around or shake it a bit?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Totally none.

  • @rj1107
    @rj1107 3 роки тому

    Let's goooooo 1K subb💯💯 amazing review dude. How bad do you think the softeness between 50-70mm is? (10 being the sharpest "sharp like sigma 16mm" , 1 being super soft)

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks, man!!! 🔥🔥🔥
      For the sharpness, I’d say it’s around 6 or 7. It isn’t that bad. But had to mention it to manage expectations :)

    • @rj1107
      @rj1107 3 роки тому

      @@DanboxingPH thank you for your feedback! Keep making dope vids 🤙🔥💯

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      For sure, man!!! Thank you for the support 👌🏽

  • @suryakathiravan
    @suryakathiravan 2 роки тому

    Recently I started watching your videos and already subscribed... Great content...

  • @zakihuntsman197
    @zakihuntsman197 3 роки тому

    does focal length can be lock?

  • @nickhiljames
    @nickhiljames 3 роки тому

    Hii dan I'm planning to get a sony a6400 what should be my 1st lens according to you "I'm planning for 16mm1.4 please suggest it will be really helpful for me, should I get 17-70 " I'm planning to make travel films "

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Hey, man. I suggest you go for the lens with stabilization as the A6400 doesn’t have any form of stabilization.
      That being said, between the Sigma 16 and the Tamron 17-70, if you don’t have a gimbal, I highly suggest the Tamron 17-70. But if you have a gimbal, the Sigma 16 is equally very good plus it’s cheaper.
      In addition, you might want to consider the Sony 35mm - ua-cam.com/video/A7vUxYmAcCA/v-deo.html

  • @maayaantow1034
    @maayaantow1034 3 роки тому

    Is this Lens good for videography?

  • @HowSo1055
    @HowSo1055 3 роки тому

    Im a wedding photographer/videographer and sony a6400 with sigma 16mm stays as my 2nd camera. I want to buy 56mm but do you think tamron 17-70 will be a good replacement for both?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Oh man, this one is tough. :(
      I personally love the 56mm from Sigma hahaha
      But in my opinion, if you have a gimbal, keep the Sigmas. Otherwise, go for a lens with stabilization, Tamron’s VC is fantastic 😊

    • @SamuelSutanto
      @SamuelSutanto 2 роки тому

      Sigma 56mm f1.4 is the beast... if u have 2 boddies of apsc camera.. i think prime lens give u sharper image.
      But if i were u..having 1 camera only.. i think Tamron 17-70 is all i need.

  • @vivekrai6582
    @vivekrai6582 3 роки тому

    some reviews say that the vc is zittery ? is it true

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Not really for me :) you might want to see for yourself. I made a video of using the lens handheld entirely - ua-cam.com/video/p3v5lak1laU/v-deo.html

  • @TexpatOTG
    @TexpatOTG 2 роки тому

    Good review. I need a lens for outdoor shooting always on a gimbal. From your review, it appears the Sony lens might be the better choice. Great comparison ... Thanks

  • @MrBierkoenig
    @MrBierkoenig 3 роки тому

    Just subscribed, Dan, go on that way with your videos like thrilla from Manila! I‘m gonna get the tamron After your recommandation. Best wishes from Berlin, Germany, amigo 😎📷

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Hello, Amigo!
      Thank you for watching, for subscribing and for trusting my review 🔥
      Cheers!

  • @albertdianealyssachannel1972
    @albertdianealyssachannel1972 2 роки тому

    Saan po makakabili nito? Salamat po

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  2 роки тому +1

      Check out Tamron PH on Instagram

  • @MrJuliuz0915
    @MrJuliuz0915 2 роки тому

    natakot namn ako sa 3 seconds...ayon na sub na

  • @RockWILK
    @RockWILK 3 роки тому +1

    I'm thinkimg this is a better buy than the 18-105, although.... I saw the 18-105, BRAND NEW, for $499 on EBay, and so.. Is f2.8 worth the difference of approx $300? Probably. I think yes... Although... OSS... There's that, too... Oh well... First world problems. ;)

  • @luisandradevideo
    @luisandradevideo 7 місяців тому

    17-70 + a6700 i dont like the result in low light

  • @adrielt
    @adrielt 3 роки тому

    Dapat eto din bibilhin kong lens eh. Kaso baka eto na ipakain sa akin ng asawa ko hahaha. Kaya I went for 18-105. Siguro by next year . Sana makabili.. Oh BTW congrats to your 900 subs malapit na ma monetize channel mo.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      I see! Hindi nga kasi siya mura noh? Hahaha
      Ah wow, super not bad, bro. I came from 18-105 as well. Did a lot with that lens too. Nahirapan nalang ako sa low light kaya I upgraded. But the focal range of that lens is something to treasure hahaha

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Yes, man! Thank you. 🔥🔥🔥

    • @lengdelagua
      @lengdelagua Рік тому

      Should I get the 18-105 muna? Since I’m budgeted. Found a 21k in marketplace. But confused ako if I should go straight to Tamron

  • @yourremarkablyaveragepal781
    @yourremarkablyaveragepal781 3 роки тому

    Medjo mahaba ang intro hehe. Ganda ng quality ng vid! Mgnda rin colors. Pero sigma 16mm 1.4 or this?

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Na excite! Napahaba hahahaha
      Thank you thank you!
      THIS all day :) but I might consider buying the Sigma 16 if my camera has IBIS.

  • @seth9549
    @seth9549 3 роки тому

    Thanks for this review 😃 If you could only have one lens then this probably is the one ❤️

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Thanks, man! Oh yeah, I mentioned that in my first review of this lens. Hahaha

    • @seth9549
      @seth9549 3 роки тому

      @@DanboxingPH Do you think the sharpness of this lens would affect the image quality? Planning to buy one and pair it with an a6400. Thanks and btw Great Content and More Videos to come!

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Not at all. In opinion, the softness at 70mm is tolerable 😊
      Thank you very much! 🔥

  • @Met845
    @Met845 3 роки тому

    Saan mo to nabili boss?

  • @DharaniRajaDR6
    @DharaniRajaDR6 3 роки тому

    Bruh! Post a portrait video shot on this lens, (tamron 17-70mm 2.8 )the video shoud have good bokeh effect, waiting for it, i just subscribed only for this lens, so i think you will know for what I'm waiting

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Thanks, bruh!! Will try to do that.
      This must be the video you’re looking for - ua-cam.com/video/p3v5lak1laU/v-deo.html
      Other than here, you might want to connect with me on Instagram as I post short clips there as well - @danboxingph

    • @DharaniRajaDR6
      @DharaniRajaDR6 3 роки тому +1

      @@DanboxingPH will check it bro

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Let me know your thoughts!

  • @duekneel
    @duekneel 3 роки тому

    naka on ung aircon pag nag rerecord ako kuys. hahaha. nag nonoise reduction lang ako sa post

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Aaaaaaah! Gusto ko din ng ganyan!!! HAHAHA

  • @jibiti7470
    @jibiti7470 3 роки тому

    that first 2 minutes tho...

  • @khantphonelwin2876
    @khantphonelwin2876 3 роки тому

    Even tho I am not interested in the topic cuz I don't want the lens, I watched till the end cuz it's Danboxing

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      WOAAAAH! Can I pin 2 comments??? Thanks for this, man!! Super appreciate it!!! 🔥

    • @khantphonelwin2876
      @khantphonelwin2876 3 роки тому

      @@DanboxingPH For sure mann 💯

    • @khantphonelwin2876
      @khantphonelwin2876 2 роки тому

      @@DanboxingPH Now I am back after 1 year and now I am looking forward to buy this lens.

  • @robowen3450
    @robowen3450 3 роки тому

    Hi, already have this lens which replaced my 18-105 and very happy with it.
    Wish you well with your move toward 1000 subs but, personally, I feel your intro whilst well produced is too long and I may well have switched off had I not really wanted to hear what you had to say about the lens.
    This comment is not intended to be abusive, merely constructive criticism from my perspective.
    Best wishes for your channel.

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Hey, Rob!!! Thank you so much for this comment.
      This is well noted and surely be considered in my next videos.
      Cheers! 💯🔥📦

  • @muratkhan2997
    @muratkhan2997 3 роки тому

    Upload more sample video with this lens please 🥺

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому

      Hey, man. Not sure if you have watched this already - ua-cam.com/video/p3v5lak1laU/v-deo.html

    • @muratkhan2997
      @muratkhan2997 3 роки тому

      @@DanboxingPH i watched this video already. Amazing video. I think you need to upload more. Thank you 😊

  • @duekneel
    @duekneel 3 роки тому

    bilis mamonetize nitong channel nato. nakapondo na ang watch hours, few more subs and monetized na! sponsored by maono na ba yan kuys? hahaha

    • @DanboxingPH
      @DanboxingPH  3 роки тому +1

      Hoping for that, brother!!! Thanks for the continued support. 💯
      Ah hindi, napanalunan ko lang din somewhere hahahaha

  • @ralfllanasas4258
    @ralfllanasas4258 3 роки тому

    Giveaway. 😏

  • @TheSoccerseeker
    @TheSoccerseeker 2 роки тому +1

    Th world is not as good as you think it is ..