The Binding of Satan in the Gospels - Bob Cruickshank Jr (2022 Conference)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 162

  • @csharkey5869
    @csharkey5869 2 роки тому +19

    Wow! I could watch this over and over and over again! Absolutely amazing. There's no other word for it. When he compared the Testament of Levi with the Gospel of Mark, I had chills. That was just so fantastic! Praise the Lord! This message blew me away.

    • @apologeticswithoutapology
      @apologeticswithoutapology 2 роки тому

      I have a word. Wrong. You know the Word of God is exciting enough. I don’t need some never heard of until after mankind broadcast while walking in the moon to discover what “1,000 years” meant.

    • @asawood4726
      @asawood4726 10 місяців тому

      I agree​@@apologeticswithoutapology

  • @kayty6673
    @kayty6673 2 роки тому +14

    I am glad this is on video. I need to listen to this several times !
    Thank you 😎

    • @stevehauk
      @stevehauk Рік тому +1

      this is incorrect. *When satan is thrown in the lake of fire (a thousand years after his binding), the beast and false prophet (Rev 19:20) thrown in the lake of fire ca. 70ad had already been there a thousand years!*

  • @maskofsorrow
    @maskofsorrow 5 місяців тому +1

    I've got to say that not only Bobs message but his whole nature is Christ honoring. No pretensions, no agitations at difficult questions. A complete joy to witness. God bless you Bob.

  • @tonynair1100
    @tonynair1100 2 роки тому +6

    Excellent teaching. David has brought the best to his conference.

  • @markthehammer3448
    @markthehammer3448 2 роки тому +10

    Great job. I've been preaching about the millennium and this gives me great insight and will help a great deal! Thank you.

  • @victorrichardson3027
    @victorrichardson3027 2 роки тому +11

    What a great lesson!!!

  • @jpdude
    @jpdude 2 роки тому +12

    Amazing message! Concise, highly convincing, and inspiring! I will be bookmarking this message and sharing.

  • @CSBadde
    @CSBadde 2 роки тому +8

    Intellent, Dept in message..interested

  • @wellsmcbogtash5238
    @wellsmcbogtash5238 2 роки тому +15

    Full Preterism owns Revelation 20. This was amazing!

    • @apologeticswithoutapology
      @apologeticswithoutapology 2 роки тому

      Well I guess they bought it from max king used because Max King bought from EVERY other human INCLUDING James Stuart Russel

    • @wellsmcbogtash5238
      @wellsmcbogtash5238 2 роки тому +6

      @@apologeticswithoutapology Dude, can you please start using some Scripture to argue you're point? Could you, for once, interact with one thing the guy says? Can you show one Scriptural connection that is wrong? What is your deal? Newsflash: No one is forcing you to watch. If you can't come up with something substantive, give it a rest already.

    • @csharkey5869
      @csharkey5869 2 роки тому +2

      @@apologeticswithoutapology If I was Max King, I'd put a restraining order out on you! Give it a break already.

    • @apologeticswithoutapology
      @apologeticswithoutapology 2 роки тому

      @@csharkey5869 I thought you had no idea who max king is?

    • @stevehauk
      @stevehauk Рік тому +1

      this is incorrect. *When satan is thrown in the lake of fire (a thousand years after his binding), the beast and false prophet (Rev 19:20) thrown in the lake of fire ca. 70ad had already been there a thousand years!*

  • @aquarpioleonine3995
    @aquarpioleonine3995 9 місяців тому +1

    Excellent presentation. This has been my teaching on the topic since finding FP 16 years ago. Good to see its becoming more popular now because I still think its the only thing that makes sense in the spiritual reality.

  • @fulfilleddynamics
    @fulfilleddynamics Рік тому +4

    Excellent presentation. Blessings. 😊

  • @suzanbarnes401
    @suzanbarnes401 3 місяці тому +1

    It would be awesome if you could have a microphone for those asking questions.

  • @lannette2827
    @lannette2827 6 місяців тому +1

    Good job! Nice seeing you in person!

  • @lexle6203
    @lexle6203 2 роки тому +3

    Very good thoughts!

  • @nigeltaylor84
    @nigeltaylor84 6 місяців тому +1

    Watching from Australia 🇦🇺 This is so good!

    • @OJubilee13
      @OJubilee13 5 місяців тому +1

      Yeah I just watched it because Bob posted it in the comments of that other video you shared in the group. I was gonna comment there and I see THAT other video was taken down. Oh well, thanks for using it to prompt me to watch this one. Very good stuff.

    • @nigeltaylor84
      @nigeltaylor84 5 місяців тому +1

      @@OJubilee13 Yeah, I decided to take that other video down. At least it served a good purpose, which led you to watch Bob’s excellent video

  • @Nunya_Bidness_53
    @Nunya_Bidness_53 2 роки тому +6

    I agree about the "thousand years". It's the only thing that fully fits the data.

  • @TPOsborne77
    @TPOsborne77 24 дні тому

    Excellent

  • @squirrelandchick9484
    @squirrelandchick9484 8 місяців тому

    Thought provoking message and teaching. Thank you for posting this.

  • @truthbetold3464
    @truthbetold3464 2 роки тому +14

    This is incredible! Irony of all ironies: Preterism is the Future!

    • @stevehauk
      @stevehauk Рік тому

      this is incorrect. *When satan is thrown in the lake of fire (a thousand years after his binding), the beast and false prophet (Rev 19:20) thrown in the lake of fire ca. 70ad had already been there a thousand years!*

    • @dannyg2311
      @dannyg2311 8 місяців тому

      @@stevehauk Psalm 50:10 KJV
      For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills.
      You think this is literal too?
      It’s a qualitative measure not quantitative.

    • @stevehauk
      @stevehauk 8 місяців тому

      @@dannyg2311 I never said it wasn't, it means more than a thousand and the binding and release is signified by the identity of this Jewish adversary.

    • @dannyg2311
      @dannyg2311 8 місяців тому

      @@stevehauk but again, you’re thinking Revelation which is absolutely rife with symbology, is literal. Yet when I present to you Psalm 50, you admit it isn’t literal.
      Consistency? Pick and choose when you suit 🤷‍♀️
      Next you’ll be telling us there’s literally giant locusts with lion heads and scorpion tails will one day literally rise out of a bottomless pit and torture men.
      Hint hint go check how long the side of Jerusalem was and their Roman weaponry and attire.
      Ballistas. Lion helmets.
      Titus had 4 legions of angels (armies) called Apollyon stationed at the Euphrates. This is historical fact.

    • @stevehauk
      @stevehauk 8 місяців тому

      @@dannyg2311 No, you're misrepresenting my view that IS taking into account the symbolism. HOW can almost 2000 years mean a LITERAL thousand, it can't.

  • @kcmerced9512
    @kcmerced9512 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for posting this!
    Terrific!

  • @maskofsorrow
    @maskofsorrow 5 місяців тому

    Very interesting and thought provoking points Bob.

  • @jorgebucardo948
    @jorgebucardo948 2 роки тому +2

    Nice work!

  • @simonskinner1450
    @simonskinner1450 2 роки тому +2

    I say John wrote his gospel and 1 John after Revelation, so had a different insight than the other writers, and his focus was on higher matters as Jesus by his inheritance being high priest and judge.

  • @lannette2827
    @lannette2827 6 місяців тому

    Great information! Thanks!❤

  • @michelhaineault6654
    @michelhaineault6654 10 місяців тому

    Amen this is a great teaching

  • @yvonnehadfield4243
    @yvonnehadfield4243 Рік тому +2

    Wish someone would give the audience a mike, so we can hear the questions!

  • @aletheiaquest
    @aletheiaquest Рік тому +1

    I think it would be a great idea to repeat the question for all of us in UA-cam land. I couldn't hear any of the questions, and my volume was all the way up.

  • @jessicabriltz2261
    @jessicabriltz2261 5 місяців тому +1

    Hi Robert,
    Question: What about Matthew Chapter 4 Verse 11?
    It reads:
    11 Then the devil left Him, and behold, angels came and ministered to Him.
    It says that satan left him. Wouldn't this speak against the notion of Satan being bound by Christ at this time?

  • @roywhite8504
    @roywhite8504 7 місяців тому

    The millennium began after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The thousand years simply means a lot of years. It could go on for a long time more. Also this shows how bad our sin is without satans help. It will come to an end.

  • @simonskinner1450
    @simonskinner1450 2 роки тому +2

    John had no idea of time as no man had, so he used the term 'millenium' not literally, but in its other slang meaning of an unknown period of time though limited by Jesus of forty years.

  • @tanda1206
    @tanda1206 3 місяці тому

    I love the Berean Bible Church, and I love this teaching. I’m new to Preterism and I thought I had some things figured, finally, buy now I’m confused…again, lol! I understood that after Christ’s 3rd refusal of satan’s temptations in the wilderness scriptures says, “he (satan) left for a season”. Then 3 ½ years later at the ‘Last Supper’, satan was released to enter Judas, when Jesus looked at him and said, “what you do, do quickly”. Was this not the ‘little season’? Also, I thought the 1000 years began with Pentecost and ended with the destruction of the temple in 70AD. Can you explain?

    • @DontYouWantToLiveForever
      @DontYouWantToLiveForever Годину тому

      A thousand of anything pertaining to God in the Old Testament meant a really large amount (not just a 1000 hills below, but all of the hills) or a really long time as in Revelation's use is millennia of time, not just a couple of years.
      Psalm 50:10 MEV
      For every wild animal of the forest is Mine, and the cattle on a thousand hills.

  • @jessicabriltz2261
    @jessicabriltz2261 5 місяців тому

    Revelation 9
    Fifth Trumpet: The Locusts from the Bottomless Pit
    9 Then the fifth angel sounded: And I saw a star fallen from heaven to the earth. To him was given the key to the [a]bottomless pit. 2 And he opened the bottomless pit, and smoke arose out of the pit like the smoke of a great furnace. So the sun and the air were darkened because of the smoke of the pit. 3 Then out of the smoke locusts came upon the earth. And to them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power. 4 They were commanded not to harm the grass of the earth, or any green thing, or any tree, but only those men who do not have the seal of God on their foreheads. 5 And [b]they were not given authority to kill them, but to torment them for five months. Their torment was like the torment of a scorpion when it strikes a man. 6 In those days men will seek death and will not find it; they will desire to die, and death will flee from them.
    7 The shape of the locusts was like horses prepared for battle. On their heads were crowns of something like gold, and their faces were like the faces of men. 8 They had hair like women’s hair, and their teeth were like lions’ teeth. 9 And they had breastplates like breastplates of iron, and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots with many horses running into battle. 10 They had tails like scorpions, and there were stings in their tails. Their power was to hurt men five months. 11 And they had as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is [c]Abaddon, but in Greek he has the name [d]Apollyon.
    Who do you consider to have the keys to the abyss at this point in time? Is Abaddon an angel of God, a fallen angel, or Satan?

  • @drewjohnson4811
    @drewjohnson4811 2 роки тому +2

    When being very stringent with time statements in other areas, which I agree with, it seems that would lead to a more literal thousand years rather than a 40 yr long "thousand years".
    Also, it seems the clock didn't start ticking on the thousand years until those who didn't take the mark of the beast were raised. Hard to see how it would start before that time.

    • @wellsmcbogtash5238
      @wellsmcbogtash5238 2 роки тому +2

      Drew Johnson: Check out his previous message on Berean: "The Magnitude of the Millennium: The Significance of the Thousand Year Symbol." The idea that "the thousand years" would be hyperbole for 40 years is in perfect keeping with the Bible's overall usage of large numbers. The video is pretty amazing!

    • @elishasbones604
      @elishasbones604 2 роки тому +2

      YOU HAVE IT EXACTLY WHY he's dead wrong....
      I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus... They came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.... This is the first resurrection.
      the first resurrection happens at his coming..

    • @csharkey5869
      @csharkey5869 2 роки тому +6

      @@elishasbones604 I was at the Conference and, all I can say is: WAIT FOR HIS THIRD INSTALLMENT: "The First Resurrection in Revelation 20." I blew me away. It was fantastic. He answers this objection and then some! If these messages catch on, this will be the new norm when it comes to Revelation 20. It seems like they're staggering how they post these Conference messages but, when it's up, don't miss it. It was even more amazing than this one. The second one is fantastic also. Three at bats, three homeruns. And he covers all his bases. I've been Premillennial, Amillennial and Postmillennial. All three of these approaches have holes in them. This approach has none. I feel like an idiot for ever believing anything else.

    • @apologeticswithoutapology
      @apologeticswithoutapology 2 роки тому

      Dude. Let me warn you don’t say things like that…these people do not like common sense or should I say “wooden literalism” or “futurist propaganda” or “testimony of martyrs” or “counting” around here..
      They are not “stupid” like you and me. They are smart. So let’s watch each other’s back in this place…you keep an eye on Hymenaeus and watch for Philetus

    • @apologeticswithoutapology
      @apologeticswithoutapology 2 роки тому +1

      @@wellsmcbogtash5238 wow. Soooo 40 years can be “hyperbolizzed” to mean barely old enough to run for President…but “at hand” can’t mean existentially imminent? Ok.

  • @apologeticswithoutapology
    @apologeticswithoutapology 2 роки тому +3

    Does anyone here realize nobody….nobody…absolutely no one ever in the history of ever looked at the six times 1,000 years are used in revelation 20 and said”….hmmm 40!”
    I realize my brain is small like the average futurist. But I think I would at least think to myself “if Max King is the only person to believe this why would that be?”

    • @preteristforever8778
      @preteristforever8778 2 роки тому +2

      Exactly, nobody has ever looked at things this way before, and how has that been working out for us? Look around at the condition of the world today. 2000 years of failed eschatology has resulted in the Church failing in her mission to be salt and light in the world. Put it together! It's time for a change!! And I've noticed that you've not interacted with the video on an exegetical basis. Using scripture alone and not inflammatory rhetoric, where exactly is he going wrong?

    • @apologeticswithoutapology
      @apologeticswithoutapology 2 роки тому

      @@preteristforever8778 YOU ARE RIGHT! Eschatology is our savior! How is been working out? Horribly. And exactly the way the Bible said it would.
      So…(according to you) the world was actually doing better off when the lord or darkness liar from the beginning accuser or the brethren was actually operating in this realm….does that make you full preterist even say wink?

    • @apologeticswithoutapology
      @apologeticswithoutapology 2 роки тому

      @@preteristforever8778 Well exegetically, mathematically, numerically, logically, historically-He took a left turn at the intersection of “1,000” and “Years.”
      Exactly. Now that would only be the one wrong turn. But heading east out of Dallas driving to California is also one wrong turn.

    • @apologeticswithoutapology
      @apologeticswithoutapology 2 роки тому

      @@preteristforever8778 exegetically how does one arrive at a millennial kingdom lasting less time than the second reich?

    • @apologeticswithoutapology
      @apologeticswithoutapology 2 роки тому

      @@preteristforever8778 right…so my eschatology says everything is shaping up as expected.

  • @kelliea5729
    @kelliea5729 5 місяців тому

    Why do some translations say 70 disciples, and others say 72?

  • @andreastarks2780
    @andreastarks2780 10 місяців тому

    Before listening to this presentation I have often thought that maybe John wrote his gospel after he wrote his Revelation of Jesus Christ, I had already believed it was his spiritual detailing of Jesus Olivet discourse. After your exposition of the other significant missing accounts from John’s synoptic gospel having been revealed in his writing of Revelation, I have a stronger belief that his synoptic gospel was written after his writing of the Revelation. What are your thoughts here ? It makes sense in that as you said, he is would not need to include these accounts in the Revelation redundantly in his proceeding gospel account.

    • @asawood4726
      @asawood4726 10 місяців тому

      If 40 years is a 1000 then anything is possible. Why not

    • @andreastarks2780
      @andreastarks2780 10 місяців тому

      @@asawood4726​​⁠clearly Revelation is symbolic apocalyptic literature

  • @carollillian3799
    @carollillian3799 11 місяців тому

    Did Jesus go to the wilderness to finish off the old so the new could come?

  • @mikezieg80
    @mikezieg80 Рік тому +1

    Was there not at one time the disciples could not cast a demon out of a boy?

  • @jjmulvihill
    @jjmulvihill 11 місяців тому

    🤔 Historicism would stand, if it wasn’t for date setting events that just don’t mesh. A Millennium of 40yrs/1 generation, just doesn’t sit. There are a dozen ways to describe that place time, but why a millennium for 40yrs?

  • @richiepayne7010
    @richiepayne7010 Рік тому

    Great message but is he saying the 1000yrs and the kingdom are separate? And is satan in the lake of fire now?

    • @asawood4726
      @asawood4726 10 місяців тому

      No 1000 year kingdom. Eternal Kingdom with an event that takes place at 1000 yrs..

    • @dannyg2311
      @dannyg2311 8 місяців тому +1

      Satan means deceiver, in reference to the New Testament, Satan was old covenant Isreal. The great dragon of old. She was cast into symbolic fire. She was destroyed. Judged.
      That’s why they were referred to as serpents, generation of vipers.
      Aka Nation Israel, her old covenant with death, her law, her temple (heaven), her religious system and her land (earth) and elements (rules and principles) chats no more. It was burned up.
      The 1000 years was symbolic.
      The spiritual kingdom is everlasting. The gates will NEVER shut.
      This earth (kosmos) is never ending too.
      That’s why the increase of His government will increase continually.
      Gosh said He owns the cattle on a 1000 hills. You think this is literal?
      It means a qualitative number. Not quantitative.

  • @Keitenrenbu
    @Keitenrenbu Рік тому

    Are you implying that The Gospel of John and Revelations were written around the same time? To actively omit something because it's written elsewhere suggest that Revelations was written first. By the way I agree with you a 100% on the content I'm just trying to figure out the time table.

  • @bonnenaturel6688
    @bonnenaturel6688 Рік тому +1

    How about Aramaic=pronounced like Eshow (E-show). That is how Jesus, his family and followers pronounced his name.

    • @asawood4726
      @asawood4726 10 місяців тому

      Just ask The Savior what His name is. He can talk.

  • @aquarpioleonine3995
    @aquarpioleonine3995 9 місяців тому

    Concerning the biblical relation of animals and spirits, it also refers to Jesus Christ as a Lamb and a Lion. The 4 Living Creatures of Revelation also have animal faces. The standards of the encampments of the Tribes of Israel around the Tabernacle were all represented by animals. Even the seraphim are described as winged serpentine beings that protect God's throne day and night.
    It's like man was uniquely made in God's image and likeness and animals were made in angels' images and likenesses.
    If this is the case then we see why angels fell in jealousy of man who were made below them but looked like GOD -- THEIR GOD! Their immortal and perfect Father represented by a mortal skin suit would cause their emotions against man and try to kill them off immediately in the Garden out of sheer jealousy and spite toward God.
    Cultures the people were given over to had gods that looked like animals so you can see that these gods/animals want a reversal of God's order which is that angels serve God by serving man. The word angel literally means messenger so they lost their place by seeking to instead have man serve and perceive messengers as gods.

  • @Maddog_Mark
    @Maddog_Mark Рік тому

    They’re full preterists?

  • @DontYouWantToLiveForever
    @DontYouWantToLiveForever Годину тому

    After the thousand years, Satan attacks the New Covenant Church located all over the earth; the "beloved city" is New Jerusalem, not earthly Jerusalem (the Holy City) located in one tiny spot on the earth.
    Revelation 20:7-9 MEV
    When the thousand years are ended, Satan will be set free from his prison
    [8] and will go out to deceive the nations which are in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them for battle. Their number is like the sand of the sea.
    [9] *_They traveled the breadth of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city._* But fire came down from God out of heaven and devoured them.

  • @zekidan8284
    @zekidan8284 4 місяці тому

    hmm, could it be that the reason john doesn’t include the binding of satan in his gospel is because his narrative of when satan is bound is different?
    Im not saying john denies and contradicts the synoptic narrative of how satan was bound rather seems john wants us to focus on how satan was bound in another sense. in other words the way satan is bound in the synoptic gospel is different then how he is bound in the apocalypse and john wants us to be able to distinguish between them.
    consider these differences in the synoptics, Jesus after receiving the spirit proves him self strong then Satan, because of this Satans spiritual power and influence over believers is restrained.
    however in the apocalypse it is Satans power and influence over the nations that is restrained. it is restrained after the church’s wandering in the wilderness for 40 years.
    we see in all the Gospels including acts and even in the apocalypse and other Johannine literature up until the 1000 years satan still has power and influence over the nations, that is the world, and he uses that power to persecute Christ and his Church.
    notice the distinction in the two narratives. this is why john doesn’t include the exorcist narratives in his gospel because he wants you to focus on a different binding, a binding that restricts Satans power over the world and reduces persecution so the reign of Christ can be fully manifested on earth.

  • @aquarpioleonine3995
    @aquarpioleonine3995 9 місяців тому

    Lazarus wrote the gospel of "John"!

    • @dannyg2311
      @dannyg2311 8 місяців тому

      Hi. Interesting, I’ve heard this before.
      What makes you think this? Genuinely curious.
      Thanks very much in advance.

    • @aquarpioleonine3995
      @aquarpioleonine3995 8 місяців тому

      @@dannyg2311 I have powerpoint on it. Sesrch youtube for 25 Readons the Gospel of John Written by Lazarus

  • @kristinegipple3133
    @kristinegipple3133 10 місяців тому

    Ooooops! Bye bye. Gotta go 🙏🏻

  • @gaatze7130
    @gaatze7130 2 роки тому +1

    Hi, thanks for the explanation of the connection of the binding of Satan and the temptation in the wilderness. I have some comments/ another point of view. My view is that Yeshua confronted the flesh( the evil sins of Adam) by not eating and drinking and going in to the wilderness. The seduction begins with” and he became hungry” for me this indicates that he was reaching his limits in the body and the evil one the flesh ( Adams inbred sins) were confronted. The flesh cannot serve God and is a enemy of God. I believe that Satan is real in that point but in the flesh that is the enemy of God. Yeshua was tempted by this inbred entity that ruled mankind in a sneaky way and was no overcome by the son of man. Satan is in my opinion he that resisted and is a enemy of God when Adam eat the forbidden fruit. Adam said “ it was not i fault i eat the fruit but its was the women that you gave to me that seduced me to eat the forbidden fruit” in this case i see that the evil one act like a snake in avoiding to give blame to himself but giving God the blame. This is the root of all evil that Yeshua was seduced by in the wilderness, in my opinion. I have a very extended study that i maid myself on this topic. In this study i go deeper in frases in the bible etc. I would like t o get in contact and discuss this with you. I love your work and you helped me a lot with Yosippe story as a back up on Josephus his story of the destruction of Jerusalem.❤

    • @markusmustermann1265
      @markusmustermann1265 Рік тому

      I think Satan can only seduce us mentally, that's the challenge of life. We must oppose it with the Word of God. Regards

  • @Sam-fp8zm
    @Sam-fp8zm Рік тому

    These things overlap with John 12
    31 Now is the time for judgment on this world; now the prince of this world will be driven out. 32 And I, when I am lifted up[g] from the earth, will draw all people to myself.
    The prince of the world driven out is a reference to the war in heaven in Revelation 12 where the devil is cast down to earth. Before this the devil can go back, and forth between heaven ,and earth like in Job, and has been accusing OT saints (,and maybe some NT saints by the sound of it) day, and night like he did with Job "he only worships you because you put a hedge of money/health/success etc around him".
    The second time the woman flees the woman is now the new covenant spiritual entity the church however she is made up of the physical Israelite remnant that got a gift of grace mentioned in Romans.
    Rev 12
    . 14 The woman was given the two wings of a great eagle, so that she might fly to the place prepared for her in the wilderness, where she would be taken care of for a time, times and half a time, out of the serpent’s reach.
    just like those peoples physical ancestors were taken out of Egypt
    Exodus 19 4
    You yourselves have seen what I did to Egypt, and how I carried you on eagles’ wings and brought you to myself.
    This is when a part of Zechariah 14 happened. Jesus second coming happens ("this generation will not pass until the second coming/judgement on Jerusalem/end of the OT happens"). He stands on the MT of Olives, it splits into two, the physical Israelite remnant now Christians run through it, it closes back up just like the red sea, and then they flee to Pella (wiki page flight to Pella). They didn't even run home to get their cloak when they saw the armies coming in
    Mathew 24
    7 Let no one on the housetop go down to take anything out of the house. 18 Let no one in the field go back to get their cloak
    they just ran with nothing which is why they had to be miraculously taken care of by God in Pella. They fled through the MT of Olives just like their physical ancestors fled in the days of the earthquake of king Uzziah. I will assume this happened around 66/67 AD when they first see the Roman armies surrounding Jerusalem, and when they aw the abomination which causes desolation mentioned by Jesus/Daniel, and crosses over with 2 Thessalonians 2 about the man of sin in the temple of God. Nero or Titus or one of the zealots or someone put up a statue of themselves in the temple like Antiochus did, and like Caligula wanted to do but didn't or they just set themselves up in the temple proclaiming themselves to be God. Also overlaps with a verse that talks about "the anti christ".
    Rev 1-12 happened first century AD. Rev 1-11 is the judgement on Jerusalem. Jesus said woe to those people then in Rev 1-11 it has the woes. The rapture happened at the last trumpet in Rev 1-11 somewhere.
    Rev 13-22 has not happened yet. There is a 2000 year gap between Rev 12, and 13. Revelation does not prophecy the Diocletian or Decius persecutions which are the closest thing to the mark of the beast that has happened over the past 2000 years.
    Revelation 13 is a prophecy about 1948 satans Israel. Galatians 6 16 calls Christians the Israel of God. Romans 2 28 gives OT vs NT definition of a Jew aka in covenant with the God of Abraham. The star of David/Solomon symbol on Israels flag is the mark of the beast. The beast may be the messiah in synagogue of satan religion (rev 2 9 3 9) / rabbinic Judaism described in Maimonides works. Mystery Babylon is physical Jerusalem but not 70 AD. It sounds like it will evolve into world capital. Then eventually there is great white throne room judgement / new Jerusalem.

  • @misterrees
    @misterrees 11 місяців тому

    Before the fall from heaven - the satan held the prior title of lucifer perhaps ..

    • @asawood4726
      @asawood4726 10 місяців тому +1

      This is a false doctrine. Nowhere is Satan called Lucifer in the Scripture

    • @dannyg2311
      @dannyg2311 8 місяців тому

      A Latin word added to an English bible.
      Why didn’t they translate the Hebrew to the English for that word?
      Isaiah 14 is clearly talking of the king of literal Babylon. Not a spiritual entity. Actually read Isaiah 14.
      If you grew up on a remote island alone with no other humans but yourself and a bible you NEVER ever would have come to the conclusion of a spiritual entity.

  • @frankdevitt1537
    @frankdevitt1537 2 роки тому +2

    Why do you keep saying
    Yeshua?
    If you are a
    Christian Pastor,
    Do you think saying
    Yeshua?
    makes you more holy?
    He is Jesus Christ the
    Lord of Heaven and Earth
    The Great I AM!
    Jn 8:58.
    ✝️✨✨🇺🇸

    • @EK-sx9ek
      @EK-sx9ek 2 роки тому +1

      The Father is the great I am
      Joh 14:10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.
      The Son was there as the Father's Word which became human.

    • @EK-sx9ek
      @EK-sx9ek 2 роки тому +1

      so who is speaking:
      Joh 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am

    • @asawood4726
      @asawood4726 10 місяців тому

      Where does Yeshua say to change his only name that saves

    • @asawood4726
      @asawood4726 10 місяців тому

      Why wouldn't a Christian pastor use the Savior's real name?

  • @EricDavidHall
    @EricDavidHall 2 роки тому

    The evil spirits in John is midrash on the evil spirits in Zechariah 13.
    Luke 1 tells you that all NT Johns are midrash on Zechariah.
    Zechariah is the reality
    John is the shadow

  • @stevehauk
    @stevehauk Рік тому +2

    Berean Bible Church
    this is incorrect. *When satan is thrown in the lake of fire (a thousand years after his binding), the beast and false prophet (Rev 19:20) thrown in the lake of fire ca. 70ad had already been there a thousand years!*

    • @asawood4726
      @asawood4726 10 місяців тому

      After Satan's bound for 1000yrs he is released in order to gather the nations to Jerusalem for the Crusades. Then his cast into the Lake of Fire about 1000 yrs ago.

  • @allrighteousness4348
    @allrighteousness4348 2 роки тому

    Sir! You are making a mistake! The millennium could not begin while Jesus was in his ministry to the Jews!! Also, Mary is not the woman with the child in Revelation!!

    • @asawood4726
      @asawood4726 10 місяців тому

      Yeshua's mom was not Mary but Miriam

    • @dannyg2311
      @dannyg2311 8 місяців тому

      Why could it not? Because you said so?
      Daniel 2:44 says otherwise.
      During the Roman Empire is when God started setting up His kingdom. Specifically after His ascension. That’s when He went to prepare a place for them. And when He came again in judgment in 70 AD all the dead were resurrected from their sleep in the grave.
      Those in faith entered the kingdom.
      Those without faith had their souls annihilated which is the 2nd death. To exist never ever again.

  • @Sam-fp8zm
    @Sam-fp8zm Рік тому

    rev 13 / 1948 Israel proof:
    Revelation 13 18 This calls for *wisdom*. Let the person who has *insight* calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man.[e] That number is 666.
    1 kings 10
    14 The weight of the gold that Solomon received yearly was 666 talents,
    ◄ 2 Chronicles 9:13
    The weight of the gold that Solomon received yearly was 666 talents,
    1 kings 10 19
    Additionally, the king made a great throne of ivory and overlaid it with pure gold. 19The throne had six steps, and its back had a rounded top. There were armrests on both sides of the seat, with a lion standing beside each armrest. 20Twelve lions stood on the six steps, one at either end of each step
    6 lions on one side, then 6 steps, then another 6 lions.
    1 Kings 4:29-34
    29 God gave Solomon *wisdom* and very great *insight*, and a breadth of understanding as measureless as the sand on the seashore. 30 Solomon’s *wisdom* was greater than the *wisdom* of all the people of the East, and greater than all the *wisdom* of Egypt. 31 ***He was wiser than anyone else***, including Ethan the Ezrahite-*wiser* than Heman, Kalkol and Darda, the sons of Mahol. And his fame spread to all the surrounding nations. 32 He spoke three thousand proverbs and his songs numbered a thousand and five. 33 He spoke about plant life, from the cedar of Lebanon to the hyssop that grows out of walls. He also spoke about animals and birds, reptiles and fish. 34 From all nations people came to listen to Solomon’s *wisdom*, sent by all the kings of the world, who had heard of his *wisdom*.[a]
    King Solomon is the 666 being referenced, and a king or kingdom (beast) would arise in the future from when Revelation was written (41-66 AD) that would have properties like him.
    He ruled on the Levant/Palestine. He built the first temple. He was greatest king of OT Israel. He went apostate then Israel split into two. Jesus said "one greater than Solomon is here" so Jesus considered Solomon the greatest person in the entire OT. The 1948 country Israel is on the same land as where he ruled, they want to build a temple, they think they have a messiah that is a lot like David, and Solomon coming to build a political military empire, expand Israels borders, make Jerusalem world capital, and rule the world forcing everyone to convert to their religion or be decapitated. The 6 pointed star on the flag of Israel is called the star of David by them because it represents their messiah they call the star of David in the same way Christians call Jesus the star of David (Revelation 22 16 ). Solomon was a star of David, and was Davids offspring. That 6 pointed star is also called the star of Solomon. The mark of the beast is the star of David, and Israel will issue it. Source of information on their messiah is Maimonides book mishneh torah, and chapters laws of kings, and their wars, and sanhedrin, and penalties.
    Romans 9 8
    So it is not the children of the flesh who are God’s children, but it is the children of the promise who are regarded as offspring
    Galatians 3:29
    29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
    Galatians 6
    16 Peace and mercy to all who follow this rule-to[b] the Israel of God.
    Romans 2 28
    28 A person is not a Jew who is one only outwardly, nor is circumcision merely outward and physical. 29 No, a person is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code. Such a person’s praise is not from other people, but from God.
    Revelation 2:9
    I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

  • @apologeticswithoutapology
    @apologeticswithoutapology 2 роки тому

    The ability of Full preterist to offer such creative nonsense is astounding and actually inspiring.

    • @duanedahl8856
      @duanedahl8856 2 роки тому +1

      And hits the nail right on the head...

    • @wellsmcbogtash5238
      @wellsmcbogtash5238 2 роки тому +13

      Dude, are you kidding? This is about the most solid teaching I've ever heard! And he appeals to non-Preterist scholars to make just about every point. He's letting them make his case for him. This was incredible.

    • @apologeticswithoutapology
      @apologeticswithoutapology 2 роки тому +1

      @@wellsmcbogtash5238 This is as ridiculous, imaginative and unbiblical as 1,000 years equals 40 years.
      Alice laughed. 'There's no use trying,' she said. 'One can't believe impossible things.'
      I daresay you haven't had much practice,' said the Queen. 'When I was your age, I always did it for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast…
      Lewis Carroll

    • @duanedahl8856
      @duanedahl8856 2 роки тому +5

      @@apologeticswithoutapology do you believe that Adam in the Bible really lived to be 930 years old???....That is ridiculous yes???...I don't think one has a leg to stand on believing that, and then turn around and say the concept of a 40 man year Millennium is wrong...the Millennium is a concept not a literal time span...it's a symbol, just like everything else in Revelation

    • @dcbobpreterist1192
      @dcbobpreterist1192 2 роки тому +6

      @@duanedahl8856 Well said! In his other message, "The Magnificence of the Millennium: The Significance of the Thousand Year Symbol," Cruickshank gives tons of examples of numeric hyperbole without even having to mention Adam. It's literally all over the place in the Bible.

  • @asawood4726
    @asawood4726 10 місяців тому

    This is idiot-ology. Making Preterist look stupid, but if Friday at 3pm to Sunday at dawn is 3 days and 3 nights then 40 years can be 1000 years.

    • @sonlover62
      @sonlover62 10 місяців тому

      There is a strong argument for the idea that Jesus was crucified on Thursday, not Friday. There were different 'sabbaths' to consider, and without going into great detail, it can be argued that Jesus was in fact in the tomb three days and three nights.

    • @dannyg2311
      @dannyg2311 8 місяців тому

      @@sonlover62he was killed on Wednesday in the midst of the week.
      Sun. Mon. Tuesday. Wednesday
      3.5 days in. Before sundown.
      Just like He was also cut off in the midst of the week (Daniel’s 70th).
      27-31 AD. Cut off.
      67-70 AD the final half of the week.
      They were given one generation, like the first exodus, to accept the covenant.

    • @contemplate-Matt.G
      @contemplate-Matt.G 6 місяців тому +1

      ​@@dannyg2311Totally agree. Most do not realize that there were two Sabbaths in the passion week. Also midweek aligns perfectly with Dan 9 in a greater context.

  • @justathoughthere
    @justathoughthere Рік тому

    That is pure heresy. The Millenium begins sometime in the future when Jesus will come back to earth. He will then reign for 1000 years and Satan will then be bound for 1000 years. The bible is crystal clear on that. Nothing in the text indicates that these statements can only be understood symbolically. A true Berean believer would know that.