@Noah-r5b I imagine it'll still get around 100 mph in a dive, however I was not able to get the weight and balance right with the 4S battery and highly recommend investing in a 6. The jet is awesome, you're going to love it!
@@Jeffroe111 Ok, thank you for the feedback I have a F-15 64mm rn and I run it a little tail heavy to help my landings, I hope to get a few 6S batterys soon 😄
So technically yes. In our STS we have the battery I think pretty much all the way forward. If you put the Roaring top 6s in it it would go all the way back for the CG to be on, but the canopy hatch was designed differently on the SS to allow for the larger battery, it's flat straight across vs our STS has a piece that sticks out about an inch on the bottom, and the STS engine is not built for a 6S battery.
@@aragorn318 Sorry it took so long to get back, so technically I was wrong. If the CG mark was the same on the STS as it is on the SS, the battery would be basically in the same place which is about an inch or so forward from the rear of the tray. However, the listed CG is different to account for the increase in battery weight which I didn't take into account initially when you were asking. The STS CG is 90-95mm back from the wing root. The SS CG is 81mm back from the wing root.
Thanks for sharing, I got the 50 mm.
50mm designates diameter of electric fan im into nitro powered rc planes
Question, how fast do you think it will get on 4s mine is on delivery and I only have 4s, nice vid looks like a great preforming jet 😁👍
@Noah-r5b I imagine it'll still get around 100 mph in a dive, however I was not able to get the weight and balance right with the 4S battery and highly recommend investing in a 6. The jet is awesome, you're going to love it!
@@Jeffroe111 Ok, thank you for the feedback I have a F-15 64mm rn and I run it a little tail heavy to help my landings, I hope to get a few 6S batterys soon 😄
Can you try something Jeffroe? If you stick this roaringtop 6s 4300 into your sts, will it cg in the same spot?
So technically yes. In our STS we have the battery I think pretty much all the way forward. If you put the Roaring top 6s in it it would go all the way back for the CG to be on, but the canopy hatch was designed differently on the SS to allow for the larger battery, it's flat straight across vs our STS has a piece that sticks out about an inch on the bottom, and the STS engine is not built for a 6S battery.
@@Jeffroe111 So in terms of battery placement and CG without the hatch on, it's the same on both jets using the Roaringtop 6s?
@@aragorn318 Sorry it took so long to get back, so technically I was wrong. If the CG mark was the same on the STS as it is on the SS, the battery would be basically in the same place which is about an inch or so forward from the rear of the tray. However, the listed CG is different to account for the increase in battery weight which I didn't take into account initially when you were asking. The STS CG is 90-95mm back from the wing root. The SS CG is 81mm back from the wing root.
@@Jeffroe111 So you still don't see any differences in the airframes between the two jets, correct?
@@aragorn318 strictly airframes, I do not.