NASA Explains Moon Return Plans in Stunning Animated Short
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 чер 2020
- NASA intends to return to the moon to stay. The infrastructure needed to make it possible is explained. Narrated by 'Star Wars' actress Kelly Marie Tran. -- Learn More About NASA's Artemis Program: www.space.com/artemis-program...
Credit: NASA - Наука та технологія
I’m ready
I think we all are. I know I am.
Hi Dustin :)
When is the sub vid coming out my man?
Looks EXPENSIVE!
Heyo destin!
ME: Is there atmosphere on the Moon?
NASA: No.
ME: What if I dimmed the lights and played smooth jazz?
You like jazz
@@VampireDoggo ya like jazz?
This is the song to play: ua-cam.com/video/P91pvMdoZ80/v-deo.html
Actually, the moon does have a super thin atmosphere, but it's barely there. There have been instances of mysterious cloud formations over the moon, observed for hundreds of years, but scientists currently have no explanation for exactly what they are because the atmosphere should be too thin for cloud formation, and the moon seems to be tectonicly dead. No active volcano eruptions observed. However, it's possible, my speculation, that there is still some deep thermal activity, and the clouds may be escaped vapor.
Andrew Heagwood
R/whooosh
Jazz or the blues, make great atmosphere. CCR and some Lynyrd would do well also...
So, like... yeah
We're gonna need to give the animators an award for this one
@@vjreimedia plus little girl voice narration is annoying as hell.
The music! But the music should be mixed better. It can be more forward, not neccesarily louder but brought out more by frequency adjustment and the voice should be panned center like you do with lead vocals, its all in the panning and frequencies.
@@JohnDoe-bf1fw
Well thats subjective, it's just a woman speaking. Maybe your a backwards asshat. I mean, the project is called ARTEMIS for gods sake, know your mythology.
Way too much unnecessary infographics garbage that competes and distracts from useful information. Thought we passed that flashy (wink) useless fad at the turn of the century.
This is not from him its from nasa themself
Don’t let me down NASA! I’d like to see a moon landing in my lifetime!!
good luck with that.It never happened and never will.Man can never get out of low earth orbit.Research flat earth!
kfm908 if you believe in this shit no one can help you anymore 😂
me too, and I don't feel so great already
The moon is dreaming small. I'm hoping for a base on Mars in a few years and at least a few larger space stations being built with the use of centrifugal force to make artificial gravity.
@Son Of Cherve any boats going over the curve?
The animation in this video is the best thing that has come out of the Artemis program so far.
Agreed, but isn't the artwork somewhat reminiscent of 1960s Soviet space posters?
@@benebutterbean2737 It sure is. And I love it!
@@Seekay_ Me too!
I've been happy with some other spinoffs, like how many more Americans can now correctly pronounce the word "Orion".
Excited na ako. Pede po ba sumama?
Has someone tested this in Kerbal SP yet?
Seriously though, looks intriguing.
The two-body mechanics of KSP will not allow replication of the orbit of the gateway...
@@stephanschmidt6579 you can get n body physics mods to fix that
Bcs it enters a new field of influenceor why? Could itbe possible in smaller scale or with a double Gateway? So u do the same At kerbin and just at the edge u transfer into munorbit. But timing has to be on point:)
Cool voice over: check
Fancy animation: check
Nice soundtrack: check
NASA financing...
Standby houston....
It’s only funny to space nerds
I think NASA's concept of the moon as the next main "outpost of humanity" is way more useful and realistic than Elon's Mars plans. However, SpaceX rockets are on the other hand so much more efficient and refined than the SLS. I think the two should just work together on this one.
They are working together. SpaceX is one of the contractors selected to design a lunar lander. Musk is proposing to use a modified Mars ship to land on the moon.
@@potatosalad2349 it doesn't exist yet let alone go to mars so calling it a modified Mars ship just sounds like marketing bs or you're giving a bit too much credit.
@@chrismofer They took the design of a ship designed to go to Mars and modified it. What do you want me to call it?
That's why they're doing it on the moon.. because if they can successfully do it on the moon then they should be able to do it on Mars making elons plans more realistic.
@@lukasnieland4052 True. They're basically planning to make the moon a pit stop for anyone travelling to Mars in the future, whether it's to develop Mars and do research, to stay there as a citizen, or to visit there as a tourist.
Guy in SpaceX moon hotel: "what took you so long?"
My lunatic thoughts.
Lmao
APOLLO 11 LUNAR LANDER: "What took YOU so long?"
Elon Musk: "Hold my beer"
ua-cam.com/video/dqwpQarrDwk/v-deo.html
We can be so much more creative, with a whole other level of good innovation, using Graphene and Quantum Technologies, check this out.
All the playlists on the channel.
ua-cam.com/channels/B9ezXYprgvhMaPWLhyoJ7A.htmlplaylists?view=1&sort=dd&shelf_id=0
Graphene playlist.
ua-cam.com/play/PLAUtk-Q2DF7wXgENPNkvc5JXH5ocia_Fo.html
Videos with important info to get around my other channel.
ua-cam.com/play/PLAUtk-Q2DF7xsjVfESM1sqZdkHJYRw--j.html
Watch all videos from top to bottom in that order, and after you watch the videos from all the playlists, check the articles and info in each playlist description.
I wonder if they will see his car on the way past? lol
This "joke" format was never funny. Now it's just tired. I'm disappointed in you.
Its sad. We can't get to the moon and comments like this get made.
Reality: hold my beer
Sheep: i can't handle the truth
Is it just me, or is this basically 60's tech.........
Yeah especially with how the lander still left behind its descent stage, I mean we've gotten to the point now where at least the lander should be fully reusable right?
spacex starship will destroy whatever orion tries to achieve
In the 50s-70s almost all focus was on aerospace and rocket engineering. That was considered "technology" and that was where all the smart engineers wanted to work. During that period we were building more and more powerful rockets and spacecraft (plus, of course, ballistic missiles and other weaponry) whereas computers and communication technology didn't really move much at all for those 30 years. At some point this flipped. Now we struggle to build rockets that match the Saturn V even as our cars can now drive themselves and communication and information sharing is global and instantaneous.
@@UnipornFrumm Hopefully.
Yes, it's you.
All Together this is the worlds most powerful *non-reusable* rocket - FTFY
@eblman I'm pretty sure that's what they think as well, but as always it's good to have backups in case something goes wrong with the first option. They even have the Lunar Starship as pretty much the first choice by now but if needed the SLS is still a great choice to send people and stick to their planned schedule.
@eblman Well you could take the old parts of the shuttles. Come up with a patchwork rocket and sell it for over 1 billion per launch?
SLS isn't NASA. Let's point the finger the right way? The cooperation's laughing their rear ends off on some private islands their SLS will buy them?
SpaceX told NASA they'd do it 10 times cheaper and? Yes you can re-use most of it.
No brainer to anyone who isn't a lobbyist.
Maybe if trump stopped pouring an unnecessary large amount of money into the military we would have the funding
Am I wrong or is the spacex approach about 30 steps less complicated than this? 1. launch Starship with reusable booster. 2. Orbital refueling 3. Access moon and earth surface with Starship 4. Repeat
@@mppmayer You are wrong.
The 70's called and they want their rocket system back.
'60s. All this stuff was built in the '60s.
Either time period, it's all been lost, destroyed, and deleted... NASA said so, so you know it has to be true... right??? 🤖🧟♂️🧟♀️🤖🧟♂️🧟♀️🧟♂️🤖🧟♂️🧟♀️🧟♂️🧟♀️🧟♀️
John Jones yeah, they said they lost the technology to return to the moon, and that’s why no one has gone there in the 50 years since. Hmmmm? Have they figured out how to protect the human cargo to survive through the Van Allen Belts?
Except that we still have copies of everything that took us to the moon, and college kids are even able to get much of it working again. There was a group of people that got an Apollo guidance computer working again for example. the tech isn't lost, never was.
Ah yeah? Well the jerkstore called, they're running out of you XD
Just kidding... George's preplanned comeback line from Seinfeld..
Man the flat earthers and moon landing deniers all hate this video.
Even when there are millions living on other planets and moons throughout the solar system with live broadcast feeds and billions of witnesses, they will persist in claiming it's a hoax. If you put them in a space suit and took them to the moon and had them walk around in 1/6 Earth's gravity they will persist in claiming it's a hoax.
@Marcus Knightingale No, no, simply allow the Sun to expand into a red giant, slowly baking away all life on the planet while the rest of humanity lives out among the stars. Let them beg to be taken aboard the last ships to leave as the last plants and animals die off and the forests turn to ash. Let them live in little bunkers as the oceans boil away and the mountains melt into slag, and then when all is gone save the molten core, still swimming in the atmosphere of the Sun out of sheer mass, we can finally turn away in satisfaction that even evidence of their existence has been irrevocably destroyed.
I am not so naive as you, Bro, to be fooled by pretty computer generated simulations of moon voyages.....: I was born with a brain and, unlike you, I use mine...!
@@danielcoetzee5793 CGI was invented around 1975. All of the moon missions were before that. The technology to fake all of that footage simply didn't exist back then.
@@nunyabiznez6381 Even when there are no millions of people (or even one single one) living on other planets and moons in the solar system, you would still believe it, IF THEY SAY SO....!
Even if no one ever ventured past lower earth orbit, you STILL believe it and continue to believe that they played golf on the moon, and drove beach buggies through the bunkers at the 128th hole, just because THEY SAY they did...!
Even when you are presented with all the facts and evidence that it is a hoax, you still choose to believe it, because THEY SAY SO...!
No-one saw anyone walking around on the moon in "1/6 Earth's Gravity"...! We saw film in slow motion of TellyTubbies prancing around "on the moon" in a film studio suspended from the ceiling with cables.....we saw them fall down and hoisted back unto their feet with these cables when they couldn't erect themselves by their own power......; they just swing back up onto their feet AGAINST GRAVITY, magically.
If you don't intend to think for yourself...; consider donating your brain to science because they are desperately in search for brains in pristine condition that have never been used before....!
While this is all going on, Spacex will be landing right beside them in their Starship.
I'd bet any amount of money that Starship lands on the moon before SLS.
Starship is delivering everything for them so nasa ‘looks good’ in all honesty nasa is now shit and old. Space is is gonna do everything from now on and nasa can pull along
@@Hari-tt6qf SpaceX brings the excitement back but NASA is really investing in SpaceX to succeed beyond their capabilities, to say that SpaceX will replace NASA in space travel is just stupid, they chose 1 type of rocket and they are doing it well, they are not over expending themselves, NASA is doing it's best with the budget it has.
@@HappyfoxBiz So why are you saying SpaceX will replace NASA? You are the only one here claims it.
Or we're you just being ... stupid?
@@MrFlatage He's not? He literally said "To say space X is replacing Nasa is just stupid"
This is great ~ The sound track / music competes too much with the technical dialog - maybe dial up the commentary and dial down the nice music a smidge ?
Civil unrest as a backdrop, just like in the 60s, this might really happen. Dajavu
Fake political civil unrest from mouth breathers.
Deja vu
@@jilawatan7 Thanks ! I was too lazy to spell check. And, I'm an English teacher !
@@CallsignVega educate yourself.
@@CallsignVega hi racist. Bye racist.
This is legit just the nasa video from over a year ago lmaoooo
Yeah, I don't know how original channel just let others straight up rip off their connect
Its from december 2019?
@@Peter8831 NASA doesnt copyright their videos because they WANT it to be spread as much as posible. More publicity. Its pretty smart.
@Mark Smileer You can watch and listen to basically the entire Apollo 11 landing from launch to moon landing to return home, in realtime, at apolloinrealtime.org/11/ ...don't know where you heard that all of the stuff was lost.
Chris Frady The telemetry data is what was “lost”. I say it never existed because they never went. The earth is flat and still with a dome, just like the Bible says. Time to get right with Jesus and quit being nasafanboys.
I remember when Bush signed off on this back when was still call the constellation. This is been in the works for almost 20 years. It's original launch date was either in 2004 or 2008. Budget cuts and regime change always puts it back.
So it’s original launch date was before the shuttle was retired? Don’t think so
I remember it too. And I remember hussein obama cancelled Constellation so NASA could focus on climate change in muslim countries.
They are still having problems perfecting the animation for a lunar attempt.
Danny H the fuck?
@@SergeantArchDornan2242 ua-cam.com/video/K4S6CZdn5rw/v-deo.html
Oh, to dream! It's what engineers do best.
For viewers in the 21st century: 1 million pounds ≈ 450 tonnes
@@toastybread6993 What's your beef? I added information that ought to make this vid easier to understand in 95%+ of the world.
PS: "When NASA returns astronauts to the Moon, the mission will be measured kilometers, not miles"
-January 2007
@John Phox almost the whole world uses the metric system.
United states: nah, distance is mesured in miles. 🤦
@@toastybread6993 NASA only use pounds for something oriented towards the U.S. public. They tried using imperial for their operations, failed, and now use metric system. (The moon landing was done using metric)
@John Phox Nope: you seem to be confusing million with billion. (For reference, the biggest ship ever - an oil tanker - was 660,000 tonnes fully laden.)
I'm sorry, but, is that in British or American tonnes? I'm Filipino, and unlike our neighboring Malaysian, we use the American Imperial system.
bruh, did you just download NASA's video and re upload it?
Evidently yes.
@@ZeitGeist_TV It's perfectly legal in this case; it's not being monetized at all, and NASA would want it's projects available for public consumption. Also, NASA's work is not copyrighted.
@PanCatCake Thats youtubes money, not his.
@@Azakadune don't they get a commission of the ads?
@@timschiller owner of video gets to claim and earn monetization
Absolutely incredible work with the illustration and production of this video! Thank you!!
They need to re-upload this video with the background music turned down about 3 clicks.
Wow. This is an incredible look into technology and the future of space travel.
There will be no space travel further than The Moon. Earth is locked and no organic living organism can escape it. It's closed ecosystem, but I believe you're not ready to go deep in to this rabbit hole.
@@Anuisgod shut up conspirationist
@@Ignacio.Romero Freedom of speech that you hate it so much.
@@Anuisgod Freedom of speech goes both ways. You can say what you like and meanwhile people are 100% free to tell you that they think it's nonsense.
@@Anuisgod if living organic organisms already where able to enter earths "locked" closed ecosystem, why can't it work the other way?
SpaceX: That's cute
XD
Lol
NASA put astronauts on the moon fifty years ago. SpaceX finally put astronauts in LEO. Yep, "cute" is exactly how I would describe it! Thankfully Elon isn't as arrogant as some of the SpaceX fanboys/girls.
@@rwj1313 it honestly is incredible how rapidly they advanced space technology in such a short amount of time. No doubt they'll be working on making a new moon station or something soon 😄
@@rwj1313 the cuteness is not for the proud history of nasa, the cute part is how looks the nasa future plans compared con SpaceX plans.
This video is giving me "The Force Awakens" vibes. Kinda new but kinda like I've seen it before. 😂
LololK
Well the narrator is Rose
Well at least this will be fun to watch
After being stuck in "low Earth orbit," going nowhere for 50 YEARS, finally some progress ahead. Now, if only they could develop a more-efficient rocket power source (or, electromagnetic anti-gravity tech?).
Yeah and wish they could stop dumping parts of the ship in stages....such a waste of resources.
Anti - Gravity is so far away but yes it's a wonder why they aren't researching more in ion / atom / plasma engines or hybrid rockets
@Alpha Centauri I honestly don't have a clue what I did wrong by saying this . I simply said that I'm not satisfied with the progress made by NASA and think that they approach things a little bit to conservative . Yes there is no wonder-technology . And anti-gravity is a basically a human - dream .
@Alpha Centauri in I'm sorry I appreciate it
@@ziuzz4168 NASA is a government entity, they have to be conservative. The reason private contractors like SpaceX can be more daring is because they don't have to worry about upsetting taxpayers.
2030:
NASA: We've started working on Artemis' stage two. Five more stages until the test launch.
SpaceX: Our Moon base can now accomodate 500 people. Our Mars base is growing, too...
NASA research centers and contractors are spread across the U.S. so that pork-barrel jobs are generated in as many Congressional districts as possible in order to influence easily corrupted members of Congress. In this way, the flow of money continues, which is the whole point.
Isn't this copyright??? This is NASA's video from like a year ago...
Source from NASA in 4K : ua-cam.com/video/_T8cn2J13-4/v-deo.html
NASA doesn't have copyright in their material, it's free to use for anyone...
This isn't really ethical, but I guess the more people see it the better.
@@nicolasdiaz5058 As long its not monetized, I don't see how it unethical
No... It's on par with Starcitizen & Squadron42 materials...
@@nicolasdiaz5058 he has ads
They should at least try to design those lunar landers in a way that could make them useful in the future. Those things are gonna just pile up there and serve no purpose. If you can’t reuse it - make it usable forever!
Suggestion: they could be used for spare parts to build or repair something(if they make the parts compatible)
nice idea although its far ahead of where we are
Maybe potential raw material
The lack of atmosphere would mean that you can melt things down without having to worry about loosing material to oxidation, the metal could be melted down and used for projects on the surface.
I love the idea of compatibility! Sounds like something we really need to progress & prosper from!
Best upload this year :) Cant wait.
Let’s wait for another 50 years until NASA to make the first move.
SpaceX will have been on Mars for 50yrs before NASA gets back to the moon.
We are going on 2024. That is the plan that NASA has for Artemis.
@@justanothergamer7918 Yes, that's the plan. We'll see if it actually happens.
50 is optimistic
Anyone can make a nice video let’s see some action
NASA isn’t going anywhere. Now SpaceX.... they’re going places.
@@tonymleitao , and your proof is........... ????????????
Without NASA's support, SpaceX wouldn't have been successful
(I'm not, of course, underestimating SpaceX work at all, just stating facts)
NASA will be along for the ride, and SpaceX won't say no.
I don't think it's so much NASA that's going to be grounded as they are still important purse holders. Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, Arianespace, and others who have allowed themselves to become overly bureaucratic and have not allowed their engineers and scientists the luxury of failing while developing new ideas are headed for retooling or the boneyard.
@Shirl Zitting UA-cam isn't the most reliable source of information. Anyone with adequate software can make any kind of video they want (with or without facts).
I consider it a unique privilege being able to stand in my yard, pointing out my telescope at the moon and saying to my son that we have stepped foot on that satellite. Humanity's footprint on this planet is so sort but we have accomplished so much is such a sort amount of time and boy am i happy to witness that leap in evolution just in the right time. I feel lucky i was born in the 90's.
I feel lucky being born in the late 50's. Sitting on my grandfather's lap while watching us land on the moon for the first time.
@@AllThingsFilm1 1962 for me, same feeling of accomplishment and awe.
I was always angry that I kinda missed out on the space age, also being born in the 90s, but seems like there's more to come!
@@OriginalMergatroid Same year here, but I am jaded that we were lied to. A funny thing happened on the way to the moon.
It’s only been 48 years since we were last there, so it’s nice to see some progress to a cartoon. Wake me up when we bother to go beyond LEO.
I have literally watched everything UA-cam has to offer.
Lies. Check out Tom Scott, Captain Disillusion, and Taskmaster.
@@em.1633 Greg Davies and little Alex Horne!
You haven't seen anything yet, kid
what should i watch
Time to find Eric Dubay then.
NASA: Artemis will take us to the Moon and beyond!!
Starship: I'm about to end this mans whole career
Starship is part of Artemis so...
You do realize NASA and SpaceX aren't competitors right?
NASA and SpaceX are partners and that is great, but SpaceX tech makes the SLS look a little silly.
Eventually, yes. But first Starship will cooperate with the Artemis mission: they made the latest cut for Moon lander funding, along with Blue Origin and Dynetics (I think the Dynetics idea is the coolest and possibly most practical! But only for this limited role).
There's quite a bit of irony here: the Artemis mission funding will help bring to fruition a launch vehicle and cislunar spacecraft that far outclasses its competitors, and which may spell the end of the United Launch Alliance as we know it (the folks who are building the SLS and Orion, the centerpieces of this whole video)
So yeah, @mangoKush12 is right. The timing is just stretched out a bit!
I heard blue origin is favored over SpaceX for the lunar mission. The way I see things playing out- SpaceX will be utilized for human transport while blue origin will be utilized for material transport. This will be especially the case for mars
Excellent and informative video, thank you guys!
One point to mention though, I wish you quoted the measures in metric as well, as that’s what NASA and the rest of the world uses.
Wasn't there a joint launch where one group used imperial and the other used metric which resulted in the rocket climbing to a thousand feet or 300 meters and then made a U turn?
Chinese guy: "Hold my beer."
So the lunar lander just stays on the moon? So there's going to be hundreds of them just chillin there? Still seems pretty primitive.
Yeah, I think a SpaceX Starship designed for Lunar descent/ascent would make more sense, but there may be reasons the lander is preferred by NASA.
The entire project is primitive. They are forced to use old systems and companies because of politics. Look at what SpaceX/Blue Origin are doing, meanwhile the SLS does not have a single advantage over the ancient Saturn V. This video may look fancy, but you're looking at the past, not the future.
@@n3lis94 That too. The first stage and boosters look way too expensive for the 'multiple' missions they're planning on.
@@stevemulcahy5014 Yeah they are, and that's the problem, they are forced to use modified space shuttle stuff because politics.
@@stevemulcahy5014 like a 3 story elevator?
I just hope this time when they go to the moon whoever goes first I don’t care, I just hope they put a blinking Bacon up there visible from the earth. Then we can have a bunch of conspiracy tell us it’s not really there.
Mmmm, moon bacon....
Just to be clear, I said Beacon Siri typed Bacon 🥓. She cannot Be the AI for the Rockets yet. You would say Siri take me to Mars and she would take you to the bar.
They already have very shiny mirrors that u can see using a telescope. Nothing will stop conspiracy theorists 🤦♂️
But you were thinking about bacon when you typed it. Now I’m thinking about bacon. Bacon 🥓
They should set up a permanent webcam
This brings me to tears. So long we have turned away from space flight. But now I hope it comes back stronger then ever. I hope to reach the stars myself some day
Wow I loved the animation design. Great job 😮👌
Great video, very informative. Just need to turn down the music just a notch as it's difficult to hear the narrator.
I understand the need to reuse a certified system that we already know...
But I really hope SpaceX gets their platform certified to support this endeavor...
It see like the current version of the Artemis spaceship/lander are not very reusable...
There are for the moment three landers in the running: SpaceX's starship (though unlikely that it will be used in the early moon mission, definitely the manned ones) and two others, one almost fully (maybe even fully) reusable and one who leaves the bottom part of the lander behind (as shown in the video and what Apollo did).
If spaceX's starship would be able to succesfully and safely fly in the next few years I wouldn't be surprised if the orion capsule and other landers are eventually scraped, hell even the gateway might not need to be used.
Seemed a bit outdated. Definitely not much recycling other than the capsule. Would like to see a plan for leaving less space garbage
maybe the'll open a moon scrap yard...
@@MDP1702 "definitely the manned ones" look the rocket doesn't exist and looks a bit silly, sls is based on existing tech and will probably be the main launch provider outside LEO
@@chrismofer Well, the first moonlanding missions are set for 2024, by then starship might be operational, just not yet for manned trips (difficult to certify), but rather just for cargo deliveries to the moon.
1:19 Nasa: "The most powerful rocket"
SpaceX: "Hold my beer."
Blue Origin: Hold MY beer.
@@ivodvo blue origins rockets are really dogshit compared to starship
For now.
@@cosmicapplethe9th283 but they're still miles better tham many other nations' ingenious rockets. Also Blue Origin and SpaceX are both the most advance space companies that their rocket technology rivals that of NASA. So give a bit of respect, both are very amazing and have a very great future ahead of them.
@@zinedinezethro9157 space x are developing a lot faster than blue origin, blue origin haven't launch any people yet, i garentee you that space will beat blue origin to the moon, mars etc and they will develop a lot faster, i love both companies though and i hope they both extremely advanced rockets, all the people saying blue origin should quit are stupid, we need as much private and non private companies launching rockets as we can
So honored to be amongst all the space exploration experts who hang out in the comments section.
The world's most expensive rocket that is used ONCE and ditched in the ocean.
@@Makkendam SLS will only.get a few launches and be scrapped once Starship makes it completely redundant
I'm so thankful for Elon.
@@Makkendam then make the rocket 3% bigger or more efficient. Replace the side boosters with land-able liquid fuel boosters.
before gateway/artemis, sls was a capable mars rocket
More likely it will be the most expensive rocket that never flies a useful mission.
This is the ultimate re-run. I saw this show fifty years ago. They haven't even gotten very creative in the remake. Very similar configuration to Apollo. The only REAL difference is the addition of Gateway. Long duration stays were in the works for Apollo applications, which had it been allowed to continue, would have been far ahead and likely cheaper than Artemis. STS is using warmed over technology and yet it is still over cost and very late. Kind of reminds me of the KC-46!
well . sorta but snot really . you are correct in that this WAS one of 1960s idears tossed out .... too complex then . for continued missions , some tweeks , its a good idear for continue travel AND slingshot to mars . another OLD 60s plan .... yup recycled idears , with "gooder" tech to make happen . imagine an ANALOG world trying this ... in kilabits???
did you watch the whole thing???
I kind of agree with you Aerofan. I saw the Apollo Program as a kid. We are literally a half century behind the curve. And you see all the delays and cost overruns with the same old contractors, then you see what Musk and Besos are doing. But I am glad we are finally going back. I am 60 now and I hope to live to see a Mars Mission. Kiss all goodbye though if the Democrats come in.
@@jhogan1960 so......you are of the belief that the GOP is a friend of science??? interesting....
@@davidcottrell1308 The proof of the pudding... It looks like 'neither' branch of the establishment party is for doing anything good that uplifts humanity, but there are outliers. Thank God.
Yes, I can see this being done in stages. Wow, buliding a base on the Moon....this is so cool!!
3:09 reminds me of the Movie Valerian, where their space station keeps getting bigger from different nations
Yeah, ever since I heard of Gateway from before I always imagined it being Point Central from Valerian.
Both are basically the same thing.
Ahhaha same!! That’s awesome
NASA and SpaceX this best !!!! 🤩🚀
Why is it that only shit like this makes me emotional?
Mack M way to make this guy’s day worse
Can’t wait to fly one of these . Currently learning the theory in Mechanical Engineering. Happy to come of age at the right time for Artemis!
Looks like what I watched on Sunday night Disney back in the early 60's. Thanks Willy Ley
I wish they'd made the music a bit louder. I can barely hear it over the narration.
the Gateway is a really nice idea. This seems so well thought i am looking forward to 2024
Can't believe it is only 4 years to go! Fantastic
@@Kevin-bl6lg no he doesnt have anything t do with the great establishements of Nasa. Nasa gets 1/60 of the military budget.
@@atomspalter2090 you try to spread FAKE news here. Donald Trump is the president who has made America the first country with a Space Force. No other president nor any other country has ever had any such thing. With Trump America will be able to travel to the Moon and to Mars. No one should think that this could be possible without the imput of him.
@@Kevin-bl6lg he is the first president that wants to bring military and war to space. America is only able to do this much because its huge and has much money. Without SpaceX this wouldnt be happening. he brings companies to national and say tings like america only americe we are america everybody says america. without economic spaceflight nasa would be a lot behind. Trumo held a speech where he literallay said elon musk is not like others hes interested in rockets in stuff which shows that he has no clue whatshappening there. btw Artemis was planned before donald trump. he inputs literally as much as possibel in military and nearly nothing into spaceflight.
Also since Donald trump is president we have a epidemic hitting the usa
more than every other country because he talked trash about the
pnademic. He literally ruined economy through his behaviour at the start
of the epidemic and still talks about the pandemic as if it was
nothing. He depressed the economical work between china and the usa.
this was bad for everyone. Donald trump is playing golf and doin nothing
more than most of the other presidents that worked hard and did a lot.
Donald Trump has openly said he doesnt care about spaceflight and nasa.
I mean The military got (2019) 620.562 million dollar .
all technologie and research and space exploration together got 28.718 million dollar. its totally wrong to say this. also its absolutely not me trying to spreaad fake news if i answer you that i wouldnt vote for trump again because he doesnt care about the things that are important to me. i did some research and even included real numbers. whats your source (if you dont know dont post a link most channels have links on the blacklist.) its my opinion not "fake News" just cause donald trump calls everything that doesnt give him right or is against him fake news thats not right. do your research and inform yourself on real sources.
Also why do u ask me this does this have to do anything with my comment?
@@atomspalter2090 you are German I guess, why should Americans care what lesser countries think? Germany has a communist welfare state, that is ripping of the USA with trade protection and underfunding Nato. USA is funding too many of those things in Germany.....time for payback. Same for China. China needs to respect the USA and Trump as natural leaders. Without US IP China could not produce anything. They're really just benefiting of the great things Americans invented. Also like they still use the ancient writing, but international use the American letters.
So many countries forced USA into wars. Trump is the first president stopping this.
No other country is able to lead the way into space. Donald Trump's uncle was a great MIT professor. So he is genetically a prooven genius in many fields.
So looking forward to president Ivanka Trump in 2024, she can lead the country for many decades, maybe 50 years, and lead the world to Mars and beyond.
It is mind boggling how utterly smart some people are to make calculations that make all this possible. Watching this almost feels like watching a sci-fi movie about space travel in the future.
Best subtle background music..quite serine and inspiring 🌈🙋♂️👍
This is all well and good, but you get the sense it’s so far away from implementation and SpaceX is just lapping NASA now.
What's a NASA?
P McFadden they already got funded 25 billion last year. They have support.
Anzuis thats nothing the military get around 800 billion😂😂
K.M. Haswell looks who’s dumb dumb now
@P McFadden the US has debt... Not money
This will keep Flat Earthers in CGI claim videos for months!
Nabil Essadiki LoL. Baited.
Nabil Essadiki the only thing busted is your intelligence.
@Nabil Essadiki your the sad parrot. your life has no meaning so you turn to comsperesys without using your brain. just sad
@Nabil Essadiki 🤣🤣🤣 When you really research for yourself you'll discover that decrying NASA is so ridiculous as the ancient Greeks figured out we live on a globe and nearly got the solar system spot on. Better than some Flerfer on a UA-cam video misinforming you eh? Lol...
@Nabil Essadiki to save myself time... did you write that to yourself? Indoctrination, belief in a book that is centuries old for scientific facts? No different to any other religious texts, and you don't accept any modern day evidence? How silly does that sound? And you call others Parrots... lol, you choose what to believe because if you believed in ancient texts you would listen to those Greeks that knew more than you and I put together.
I loved this! Great animation and great plan.
Good to see rocket scientist are finally learning PR. Just watched an ad for a space station meant to be assembled by drones, dock several large spacecraft, and contain several full sized rooms with artificial gravity and nearly fell asleep it was so boring. 10/10 for showmanship NASA
I might be missing something but I thought the lunar lander was gonna be re-usable!!??? For multiple decents and blast offs to and from the moon and the gateway.
Spacex developing SSP, which will be a mars mission rocket, but they will make a modifed version of it, so they can use it for Artemis too.
That’s what I was thinking. After every decent to the moon you’ve now only got half a rocket left and you have to get rid of both of them
It's going to take multiple SLS launches just for one manned mission to the surface. Glad I'm not paying those tax dollars. SpaceX approach is far more modern and sustainable.
What do you thin it would cost to bring it all the way back to Earth to be refurbished?
@@JoseyWales44s God knows! I thought the moon lander and the part that blasts off from the moon were gonna be re-usable many times before they leave the moon and head back to earth.
"Once these engines light, there's no stopping what comes next" they say that like it's a good thing... Solids are not great for crew.
the usaf and nasa have been using solids for decades. this is just the beginning. other, better methods will surface.
Meanwhile SpaceX doesn't use solids, actually can resume their rockets, and launch for half the cost, and is already launching. Boeing is a joke.
Nathan Black lol let’s see you build a fucking rocket to the moon big guy
@Mark Smileer radius of earth: 6,371 km
@Mark Smileer they just got the circumference using satellites and then went from there
This will be so amazing to witness, I can’t wait to see humans back on the moon.
No one has ever landed on the moon. Its not possible. scientist admit that they've never been out of low earth orbit. The elements used on the 60s rockets were no where near strong enough to make it thru radiation belts. We still are told the technology was destroyed and they cant replicate it in 2021. Oh yea and Bezos had problems with communication from 60 miles up and below. Imagine Nixon talking on a landline in 1960s. If you belive that you're a special kind of stupid. Stanley kubrick was brought in to direct the fake story in Hollywood in the 60s landing. Nothing has ever made it to the moon. In fact no astronaut has ever made it past the low earth orbit.... its in a video. They admit it. They use tethers to make it look like they're floating. Look up NASA messes up again. Fake space station videos. Made in Hollywood basements with the same technology of a porn movie.
I love all Nasa (Anime) movie productions!
"THUNDER BIRDS ARE GO!"
Launch date: March 2640, weather delays notwithstanding
@Sanuk Jang Lery It's gonna take a lot longer than 620 years to get to Alpha Centauri. More like the year 80,000 AD if our ships get faster.
@@aidanmeyer944 you people love fantasy land beliefs 😂😂😂🤣
@@hjsalvage2 What? I did all my calculations based on the speed of Voyager 2 and the distance to Alpha Centauri. I'm not sure what you're on about.
@@aidanmeyer944 voyager 2 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😅😅😭😭🤣🤣🤣 ain't nothing out there. Just fake ass pictures that YOU PEOPLE believe in. Its hilarious 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@hjsalvage2 Oh I see. Sorry, didn't realize I was talking to a mentally disabled person. My mistake.
It's so easy to animate a successful moon landing, that a caveman could do it.
@@shahriarzandi9416 ok we havent been on another planet in over 50 years also we can launch for the moon.
Wow. Loved watching that. Amazing science and technology
nice video, simple and informative, great work
Well that's not new.
Hi brother ,, can you help me ?? please, Watch my video and if you like I want you to subscribe to my channel. I hope you help me. I am from a poor family and I want my channel to succeed in order to earn a little money. My appreciation and respect for your help.
ua-cam.com/video/mOJiErLcTyQ/v-deo.html
Spacex....
ua-cam.com/video/dqwpQarrDwk/v-deo.html
Alien on the Dark side of the Moon : “O gawd they’re coming BACK?!. Where’s my ray gun?” 😂
In 1955 Von Braun's original Moon plan used an Earth orbiting space station to relay missions between the Earth and Moon. It wasn't done during the Apollo program because of the "space race", but today it makes just as much practical sense. We also need a successor to the ISS.
Quite well done! Thx.
The SLS is wasteful! SpaceX reuseability is the future.
I think the SLS is nearly fully developed
Starship is still a baby that we are not sure when it will be ready (I hope in the near future, I'm totally excited to watch its first launch)
@@AhmedAshraf-pd7mu Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if SpaceX had been able to size up their Falcon 9's and launch the same payload as the SLS with (or without) the heavy configuration now if they had been asked and funded to do so a few years ago. Hell, originally they had the falcon XX planned, basically a sized up falcon 9. This has now been turned into the starship program. Just imagine if NASA had said to them, "we need you to just get us a 100 ton booster, here is your money", the booster might have already been operational now. At this point the main focus is on starship and the booster development for it is only just going to begin around now (at least creating and testing prototypes).
Ahmed Ashraf starship is in the work. The falcon models using the raptor engines are completely functional and reusable.
Well, SpaceX rockets is not as reusable as my Lego SLS!
Hopefully the starship doesn't do this very often, or at all for that matter. ua-cam.com/video/BCUYG5SonCY/v-deo.html
I worked for a manager once (great guy, learned a lot from him). Whenever I would show him a plan that was all worked out he'd smile and say: "That's great! Is it done yet?" Get it done!
You had me at moon, where do I sign.
Really like the retro style of the animations! But also started to think at the end... retro animation for retro tech.
This idea is over 50 y/o! Where is the real innovation that doesn't include 21st century CGI?
Do you even saw it? Lol
Exactly! Still using big ass rockets, same rechnology from basically ww2.
One theory is that we have a massive space fleet. And the Space Force is a way to slowly bring it out to the public. But let me not say anything before people think im crazy.
Stunning animated short 😂😂😂😂😂. That’s all we’ll get, all we ever get folks ! 💤💤
What's the software they use to make the video? Any ideas?
I really wish I was 25 years younger, so I could take part in this effort
Not being reusable means it is much more expensive than other launch vehicles and hopelessly outdated from the getgo.
Hopefully if the gateway station can be expanded and basically replace the ISS we can be on a long term path that will see increased re-usability as the program moves forward. Fingers crossed anyway! It's about time we moved passed LEO. The ISS is impressive but it's not really "space".
You've been brainwashed by the cult known as SpaceX
I think we can accomplish more if the launches are a fraction of the cost of non reusable rockets. I don't care who it is. China is #2 in the race of producing lots of reusable rockets. If SpaceX is bad, then maybe buy them from the Chinese. But to spend twice as much per launch as needed is just silly.
@@tomthx5804 by "cult" do you mean the first private company to launch humans into orbit?
@@tomthx5804 lol, spacex is a cult now? Yeah right....
Amazing,finally what's all the world waiting for...space discover
@smith will Idiota
the deep sea are is the most underated place to be explored...
@smith will why can't you just believe that humans can and are actually going into space? Why do you deny it? Do you not want to see humanity make progress in space and explore entirely different planets someday? I know for a fact you're only denying space progress because you want to be part of a group that is different, and accusing NASA and other space programs of faking all this is the easiest way to set yourself apart from people, and inevitably the truth. I feel sorry for you, I hope one day you will realize how ignorant you were to deny everything that was put in front of you. Or maybe you will die old and alone still believing your fallacies, who knows?
Chris N. he’s a FE cult member. They think the world is covered by a lid and that Antarctica is an 80,000 km plus ring of ice that keeps the oceans from slopping over the edge.
smith will Space research is the number one thing we should be focusing on.Think of the progress made spending our energy towards that than constant bickering.We’re Cosmic ANTS on a anthill adrift in the sea made of stars it’s a wonder we’ve come far at all.
Thank you space for your unique perspectives on our world. For hope and for what I can only describe as the adventure of what lies beyond!
What? Can you turn the music up!? Louder! LOUDER! Perfect.
In two years: Well we do not have the money to do all this fancy stuff. But we will do some low earth orbits with the SLS instead 👍
Pascal Jaeger sls is trash
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@franciscopezana4200 ok shiny rocket man
Just give the money to SpaceX and finish the Starship.
SpaceX are trash and waste of money
@@haider9874 Why?
@@BRYMMA- when the most amazing accomplishment from space x is vtvl(vertical takeoff vertical landing), you know they suck. Vtvl was something the company McDonnell Douglas DC-Xmanage accomplish in 1996 with simular specs and cost+no failures.
Space x with its 36 billion dollars, 8000 workers and heavy founding from usa, hasnt accomplished shit meanwhile china land on the far side of the moon. Oh yeah, launching people in to space is a amazing archivement? Even the sovjets manage to do that in the early 1960s. The only thing space x is good at, is to travel back in time
@Smart Simp you know that space x already achieved way more than just vtvl? They send rocket boosters into low space and land them again and reuse them for up to 5 times by now. Also the boosters move to the side not just up and down. You can compare this to throwing a pencil over the Empire State Building and let it land upright. That’s something no other company has managed to do.
@@samaelm.663 did you just prove space x has done more than vtvl, with tgeir archivements of vtvl?
Im dying.
The choreography is with such transmission it makes one think they are already in the future
What is this song called in the background? I really like it does anyone know or did they make it or something.
This is if Elon hasn’t got starship going
ua-cam.com/video/dqwpQarrDwk/v-deo.html
There are barely any reusable components here 🤦🏽♂️😭
Ok shiny rocket man.
They should actually give a huge shoutout to the graphics team in the Apollo missions..
A.. a... nice Karen??
I had a dream about grandfather William Thomas Perry the 2nd when I was a child sometime in 1980. My grandfather walked with me holding my hand as we entered a slightly curved creater on the surface of the moon.
Looks great, still seems like a waste of materials being left in space....why would you not continue with the stages to to moon? Could be used for parts if needed?
Efficiency. Google the concept of DeltaV. In a place like space, the amount of change a ship can make to its velocity is more important than anything else. Once the fuel tanks are spent they are dead mass and decrease the range of the spacecraft because it takes more fuel to move the extra mass.
I was thinking the same thing and after many missions they will have to calc risk of hitting debris but as long as they just do it so this generation can see it AND then work on improving the technique with every iteration it will be fine. Can you imagine if they make space tourism viable? Have low orbit tours to find these deeper space missions, man I could see earth 🌍 before I die. Freaken awesome time to be alive!
Too much mass. They would need a lot more fuel. Of course, Elon has figured that out. He will use the entire ship as a single piece. Hope I live to see it working.
@@spencerross9140 They could make orbit with everything if they designed it that way, like Spacex is doing right now. Their system will put every other space program to shame.
why do they always use pounds when SI Units are Kg
because USA is center of universe..
SI unit of weight is actually Newtons. Trust me, NASA uses SI units internally. Pounds are only for press releases.
Cause it's primarily intended for American audience, and that animation isn't supposed to be used for scientific purposes. duh
@@youdontexist. Why? Because NASA uses lbs instead of Kg for so that American audience can understand the video?
Nischal Acharya exactly. I rate whole nation just based on one video.
The music backing in this video is HIDEOUS, it crushed the narration. D- on the production skills.
This music is really cool. Fits it so well, NASA should just contract Daft Punk and alot of chill step artists, maybe some dub step.