The Most OUTRAGEOUS Update in Photoshop History 🤯 Ai...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лип 2024
- If there's anything you would like me to cover in a video, then let me know by commenting down below!
What do you think of adobe generative fill ai?
🔗 Links
Will Paterson: linktr.ee/willpaterson
Take a look at our store for awesome design resources! assets4d.com
Join the Reddit crew: / willpatersondesign
Become a member: / @willpatersondesign
If you would like me to design your logo and company branding, please check out my website for more information! www.willpaterson.design - Навчання та стиль
Hope you guys enjoy the video! If you liked this video, then you'll love this one: ua-cam.com/video/vq1N2bjPTqM/v-deo.html
This is how people thought photoshop worked years before😂
Omg that's so true😂😂😂😂😂😂😭
The clients asking changes with a click of a button 😂 Now its getting really concerning with the clients knowing this new AI tech, they will become greedier & more demanding😅
It's both revolutionary and horrifying that Adobe has begun to implement artificial intelligence into their services.
yeah it's scary times!
Vai ser melhor ainda logo logo
the magic button is finally here in photoshop. Scary as hell
When I got into design back in 2006, I was obsessed with learning how to do photo-manipulations. It’s exciting and scary that it’s become a literal click of a button.
I personally find this "instant" society stressful and this ai tool reinforces this. Although it is impressive, we are losing the core human nature of patience and skill.
Great video Will.
I get you. It takes some of the charm away from our work. This will always be some what of a novelty in the current way it is now. I think as time goes on this gen ai will help in others areas of the design process without taking the charm away. It's still cool though ha.
This is what our grandparents say about other things. Sometimes it is true, a lot of the time it is not
What makes me happy about this is that adobe is actually using images from their own library instead of scraping the internet and stealing other’s work.
You know what? I actually want to use my own images and mix and match, would be awesome to teach it your own style
@@galinageorgieva4735 Well, then you’d willingly be utilizing your work to train the AI. Currently companies like stability do not pay for the royalties of the images they use to train their software.
@@galinageorgieva4735 You could train your own Stable Diffusion model locally on your PC if your graphics card is strong enough. Requires some time to setup, but there are good tutorials on how to do that.
Fascinating and scary at the same time. It opens a door for more people to become creative but also undermines the genuine old school digital artist…
AI is here to make our jobs Easier ... to replace
🎯
Bingo. I feel a lot of digital and tech based work in general. Sad day. Now, if they cut the work and keep the pay scale then that's another conversation..
Exactly. Makes me nervous. I'm a design student and love it but I'm seriously scared I won't be able to find entry level jobs when I'm out of school.
@@pieflower6419 well there will still be people looking for ART with creativity
I think this is how AI should have been used in the first place, as a tool to improve your own workflow. Instead of doing everything for you.
The end of creativity and dedication 😢
Yep. limitation creates creativity. this is the opposite of that...
Photos used to be for capturing a memory
Now its about making up the perfect idea of one
oooooh that's a good saying!
For designers this is awesome! A lot easier and faster than combining/designing images yourself. But it's also easier for people who deliberately want to spread misinformation. Just like deepfake and such, that's the scary part of it...
There's a feature where when you use Generative Ai in an Adobe software it'll be tagged in the metadata - to show that it's used Ai. :)
@Will Paterson Oh, that's great! Glad to know that. 🙂
@@willpatersondesign I'm afraid this can easily be circumvented by taking a screenshot of the image for example.
@@Sousou007 That's true for just about any made image in Photoshop though :)
@@willpatersondesign Sure, but I mean that the argument Adobe (and others) make may do more harm than good. People could be more enclined to trust images which are not tagged as "made by AI" even though they could also be fake.
I'm guessing they advertise it as such to avoid liability, but I believe it's quite bad marketing wise 😕
I think that manual work is extremely important. It helps everyone to develop, it creates problems that are very interesting to overcome. Now I'm really, really scared that manual methods to transfer creativity into some kind of work will get depreciated. My hobbies are currently programming and 3d modelling, and I'm worried that I won't be able to make a living doing this. At the same time, it's fascinating and wonderful for most of the people. I'm feeling lost
So looking forward to trying this in the real world!
Oh finally!
This studio is my favorite!
This is absolutely mind blowing! But the scary part is that it might be hard to know what’s real anymore
It will change composting to a different level
Very interesting! as a side note: what music did you use for this video?
I’ve already been incorporating the new AI’s into my design classes. To me it has the potential to be a major boon and tool for our industry.
Thank you for expressing your optimism. The usual knee jerk ludditism has been a bit annoying, this was refreshing, especially coming from a designer.
Job of a graphic designer is safe as long as customers are unable to describe precisely what they want.
That being said, ai is definitely not that great of a thing in general
Once ChatGPT is able to apply created content to possibly template based layouts with fonts is when a portion of designers will lose their jobs.
Wow. This is going to be fun!! Can’t wait to update and mess with it!!
Does graphic design require a lot of hand drawing? Never drawn/sketched on paper before. When i first got into drawing a few years ago, I just jumped straight in with my tablet, redesigning movie logos. I've since then gotten ingo making digital posters too. So drawing by hand is something i would like to experiment with someday. Does graphic design also require a lot of math? And if both of these are a yes, does that mean i should just not go into the profession at all?
Graphic Design is different based on employer and clients preferences. Some Designers are very hand drawn art based and some digital photography based and everywhere in between. Some things can be learned; some can be natural artistic talent. It just depends on your talent and style and where you work based on that. Math not really although some times it can help in very small instances (simple math) like using to find logo sizes or screen sizes, art board sizes etc. Nothing to be scared of and general things. Just be creative to the highest level you can be and research, learn ( which sounds like you are ) and you will find your place eventually.
I went to an AI in San Fran a few weeks with and one of the head execs was there about an AI discussion and he said they plan on basing the dataset off of their stock imagery for Firefly
I think it’s a tool and till it becomes a true problem in whatever form that maybe we need to take advantage of the technology.
props to the Adobe marketing division
the feature seems to be greyed out for me atm , any idea as to why ?
Welp, guess Im going to start looking for a new career
I bet artists said this 'no more artists will be needed' when cameras came along! This software is amazing and its just the beginning
Yup. Painters said that!
That's not really the issue, the customer can't even properly describe to the ai what they want 99% of the time.
What's bothersome is how this might reduce the perceived value of work. Yeah, many used to think this is how Photoshop works but you could easily show them they were wrong. Well, now they'll be right. Graphic designers are already extremely underappreciated because there's a lot of people who've took up the trade and the value of work tanked. This'll tank it even further soon
@@belivuk2526 Designers are undervalued because good design is taken for granted. You have to show your value in any profession, we're not alone in that.
We're not hired just for our skills, but also for our thoughts and theories in the design process.
does this available in all adobe photoshop plans ? ex : the photography plan ( PS and LR)
Well I think this will let people do graphic design easier. So, I am scared if this job in the future can be still well paid as it is now. Because if license will not be much pricy then I think that thanks to AI more people could do graphic design than now.
Its like a pro basketball player saying a basketball is so cheap, I am worried that everyone can replace me and get a pro at basketball playing. Not everyone has the talent and people who have will be more importent than ever. It is just a tool, but you still need the skill, ambition and vision to use it properly
@@MrMorrisonandDean I can't imagine missing the point this hard
@@gtsb I didn't. He said that graphic design will be paid less. That's maybe right for a majority, but it will just sort out the good designers from the bad and those who deserve a high pay will get a high pay, because of their talent and vision. So if you are talented, you don't have to worry about it, if you still are, maybe what you are you doing right now wasn't was never the perfect fit for you anyway.
I have the latest version of photoshop but can't find this feature, what about it?
It’s only in photoshop beta atm
It's a very cool feature. 1. Will it replace designers? Well the only caveat that us humans have over ai is that we have emotions and can sympathetically respond to a brief. With the rate of development currently with ai, I think it will be a matter of time when that happens. Will it help? Yeah definitely, its a fantastic easy tool. 3. Ethical implications? Well what pool of imagery is this tool using? Who knows. My thoughts are it's this good at this stage. The fear of it replacing our jobs will probably come more to life over the next 2 years.
Music name at 0:15? Pleeeease
this is great!
People never hire graphic artist again ? 😢
HOLY COW
Is this feature already out or still in beta mode? Insane feature btw!
The future gonna be scaryyy! 💀👻
AI is the beginning of the end, It promotes godlessness
It’s crazy 😮
This gave me anxiety ngl. I feel that losing the learning curve, the skills, the craftsmanship that we need for good design/illustration/composite is really sad. More simplifying stuff? Yes! One click do all? Boring and sad.
I don’t see it that way - I see it as a stock photo thing. It is scary how well it works though.
I agree...
You even don’t need any AI to swap the Mona Lisa’s head with that of a dog in PS. Anyway, not an example of good taste.
Hey man !
How are you?
Yeah. I can't stop fooling with it! Vundebar!
It's 2023; brush pressure sensitivity options still have no pressure curves but we have this AI trash...
Everyone is going to be living a "rich" lifestyle now😅😅
They are 9 months late (which is generations in AI space). Stable diffusion was able to do all that last summer. Its very primitive compared to where stable diffusion is today with ControlNet, Dreambooth/LORA and tons of additional extensions and parameters to get better results. All completely free and open source.
Somewhat true, but I haven't seen anything exactly like what Adobe has done here, especially with Firefly. It's just insane
HI WIll
Hey! Hope you're well. :)
@@willpatersondesign Want so good, but now feeling a lot better thank you. I hope you're doing great !!
good
It is paid?
Adobe Ai bot Loading.....
GG
Totally disagree, this is the end of professional designer for many reasons, and not just of them. And it’s scary to see that you apparently do not see it, or unconsciously deny it. There’s no need of you (especially in a short time, when it will be surely even better implemented) if a person x can just write what they want, endlessly, until they get it. And the world is full of “that’s good enough” already, just imagine how useless you’ll become when results will be even better and faster. Same applies to writers, copyrighters, journalists and the list goes on and on. The illusion of a better side for this AI implementation is actually delusional or naive.
I think being in the position Will is allows him to see past the negatives AI will have on 95% of creatives. His job is more likely to stick around due to his standing as a designer and his successful UA-cam channel.
He continues to hold a super short-sighted view on the whole topic and seems unbothered that all this AI art is stolen work
@@gtsb I disagree with it being short sighted - the Ai in this video is helping artists and designers. If graphic designers become replaced - then every job will be replaced. Also, all Gen Ai in Adobe Firefly or Gen Fill is licensed, not stolen... lol
There have always been cheaper alternatives for logo designers. Nothing has changed.
@@willpatersondesign Apologies on missing the licensing of the photos, that's my bad. However you have also spoke pretty highly of tools like Midjourney in the past and brushed off the stolen art issue.
And while I don't disagree with this helping artists and designers, I strongly think it harms anyone trying to make a living being by being one.
You've said yourself how much this will increase productivity and turnaround on projects, and surely you can see how that will impact the amount of creatives able to sustain their careers.
I also do think that a large majority of other jobs are in danger of being replaced but that wasn't the point of my comment
@@gtsb I totally understand your point. Turnaround times isn't the main reason why Ai would replace any graphic designer - it'll be the price and quality of output. If you need a human to control this output then the Ai can't fully replace.
Will jobs change? Definitely. Will it fully replace, erase and outpace human designers? I can't say for definite but I'd say no. Just like the advent of the letterpress near completely replacing the jobs of professional scribes, life can look different but there will definitely be a job and role for humans.
A lot of people like to hate on Ai but I'm rather hopeful for increased opportunities and expanded creativity. :)
I have a ton of respect and admiration for you as a creative and an entertainer, but I feel every single take on AI you've expressed has been incredibly shortsighted.
AI tools like this are indisputably bad for anyone trying to make or continue a career as a designer. The massive boost in productivity you mention over and over will reduce turnaround times, the needed expertise, and as a result cut the bottom 90% of designers out of the field.
It will become exponentially harder to make a living wage off of design as artists have their work valued less, get paid a fraction of current rates, and get replaced more and more.
It's a race to the bottom here, and while you're confident in your own job security given your standing as a respected designer and video creator, you can't just look at it through that very self-focused myopic lens while talking about how amazing AI will be for designers.
And don't even get me started on how all these models are trained on stolen art.
Thanks for the kind words at the start. I'm not being short sighted, I'm being more hopefully optimistic. :)
Well said. Example my current full time job does a lot of digital design work. If AI becomes more prominent, our day to day work gets cut in half. That means we have half the work to do if it's done using AI. Sounds great but actually it means we wouldn't need to work full time at the same pay scale or at least the team gets smaller. AI will cause jobs in the long run because companies don't think in terms of employees. They think in terms of bottom line and how much they can save. Especially when an economy were rocky.
They can now charge more and just say, i put alot of effort & time in this so i will charge more🥲🥲🥲