Webb's Cartwheel Galaxy - Breakdown and Analysis
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 чер 2024
- To get started for free, visit brilliant.org/launchpadastronomy . The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant's annual premium subscription.
00:00 Webb's Cartwheel Galaxy - Breakdown and Analysis
01:39 What Webb's new images of the Cartwheel reveal
02:36 How did the Cartwheel form?
05:21 Supernovae, Neutron Stars, and Black Holes
06:33 Digging Deeper into Webb's images
09:22 Which galaxy collided with the Cartwheel?
11:22 What's next for the Carwheel?
11:59 Thanks to Brilliant.org!
12:44 Thank you, Patrons!
🔔 Subscribe for more: ua-cam.com/users/christianread...
🖖 Share this video with a fellow space traveler: • Webb's Cartwheel Galax...
🔴 Watch my most recent upload: goo.gl/QbRcE2
🚀 Help me improve the channel by joining the community on Patreon
/ launchpadastro
🚀 Check out Launch Pad merchandise!
teespring.com/stores/launchpa...
Disclaimer: Some of these links go to one of my websites and some are affiliate links where I'll earn a small commission if you make a purchase at no additional cost to you.
🧭 References:
NASA/STScI Press Release: webbtelescope.org/contents/ne...
ESA Press Release: esawebb.org/news/weic2211/
Renaud et al 2018: academic.oup.com/mnras/articl...
✅ Let's connect:
For business inquiries - chris AT christianready DOT com
Twitter - @launchpadastro
Instagram - @launchpadastro
Facebook - / launchpadastronomy
Discord - / discord
📭 c/o Christian Ready
P.O. Box 66
Westminster, MD 21158
United States
Earth
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Watch next: Solar Orbiter Discovers Surprising new Phenomenon in the Sun
• Solar Orbiter Discover...
~-~~-~~~-~~-~ - Наука та технологія
![Everything NASA Discovered from James Webb's First Year in Space [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nbDQEo0uA0Q/mqdefault.jpg)
![Everything NASA Discovered from James Webb's First Year in Space [4K]](/img/tr.png)
🔴 Seriously, check out Webb's First Images. You know you want to: ua-cam.com/video/zTJifrl3SDM/v-deo.html
Webb is in its infancy and already achieving so much - can't wait to see the future.
It's pretty insane that Webb can show us *individual* stars from something that's 440 million light years away. That's some serious resolution and you can really see the difference when zooming in on this and the Hubble pic side by side.
* 440 million light years away
@@TuNguyen-vu1cg True that, fixed
"It's pretty insane that Webb can show us individual stars from something that's 440 million light years away."
Impossible, and insane, but that's present day astronomy for you. There is no proof they are detecting stars and never can be. Even Proxima Centauri can never be proven to be a star.
@@thedarkmoon2341 "There is no proof they are detecting stars and never can be"
That's some hardcore mental gymnastics you're pulling there. Loosen the tinfoil hat a little so the blood flows back into the brain.
It's just a joy how much more you are able to add to the information we already have, great job, great additional footage of these simulations (I loved the 3D "flying" towards the core the most), well done! BUT: I thought you would never get to G1 and G2 😱🤣! These two companions are just as beautiful! And what about all the tiny little galaxies everywhere?! These pictures are just mind-blowing and we just can't thank all the people enough who made this possible!
Really glad you enjoyed it. I always try to go a little deeper than the press release :)
I really appreciate that your videos get into as much technical detail as they do. There's so much scientific outreach that just assumes almost zero knowledge of the audience - it's very refreshing.
Thanks. I know I’ve got a great audience that wants to learn as much as I do.
CHRISTIAN!!! This was fascinating!!! JWST proves again that patience is a virtue!!! I love these images!!! CHEERS!!!
Thank you, my friend!
Fantastic! While other videos on Webb's images of the Cartwheel were released earlier, I had waited for yours to watch first. Thank you for these insights! Wonderful presentation.
Thank you so much, and sorry to keep you waiting 😧
@@LaunchPadAstronomy Well worth the wait - thank you!
Same hahaha !
This was the most amazing video ever that I saw on UA-cam about Webb image of cartwheels galaxy.. You have presented quality details and I loved the way you explained that precious simulation to us.. You are super amazing.. Do ypu have any idea when will JWST release image of Betelgeuse and Sag A+ ? Do you have any information leaks? I just can't wait to see the image of Betelgeuse by James Webb.
No inside knowledge I’m afraid, much as I try :) But the good news is that you can look at all of the approved observing programs that JWST is going to be working on for the rest of this observing cycle (~a years worth).
@@LaunchPadAstronomy Is there any way to request nasa to direct JWST towards Betelgeuse?
Can jwst detect the heat signature of gravitational wave that was produced due to the collision of G3 with Cartwheel Galaxy? I am asking this because I have heard that gravitational waves heat up the nterior of stars, planets and even dust clouds through which they pass. As James Webb is an Infrared telescope which can see in mid infrared and far infrared so I think that it must see the infrared light produced by the heating of galactic dust as the gravitational wave passed through it. Isn't it?
What if Beteljuse go supernova right now? As Miri can take image of only a small part of the sky at a time and then it has to wait for 30 seconds to take another image adjacent to the prior part of the sky in the first image, so how the James Webb team will manage to take the Mid infrared image of the whole supernova covering a lot of area in the sky in very less time... Another problem is that if Betelgeuse goes supernova tonight, the supernova remnants and dust will block the view of sky behind Betelgeuse ... So don't you think that Webb should investegate the sky behind Betelgeuse as quickly as possible before its goes supernova and block the view?
Please Reply..
One of the very interesting things in this image is that JWST also reveals background galaxies even through the galaxy. One of the Ultraluminous X-ray sources actually appears to be a background object now, it being very bright in Chandra's image, but having a very deep red colour and a defined shape in the NIRCam. This is new info that we could only get through JWST's enhanced resolution!
Outstanding presentation... as always.
I have seen a few other videos on UA-cam explaining Webb's image of the Cartwheel Galaxy. So far, this one is the best. Thank you!
Thanks I’m glad you enjoyed it!
Excellent treatment, Christian. I hadn't seen anything about option 3.
Really enjoyed this one! Thanks for the video
This galaxy has always been one of my top ten, maybe in top five. Now thanks to Webb I might have to promote it. Plus, you presented information about the Cartwheel galaxy very well.
I'd like to see a follow-up to this video with better images and your ideas about G31, such as detailed structures that support the theory it's the best probability of having mixed up with Cartwheel. Will their be better follow-up images taken of Cartwheel since this was an image quickie for public consumption?
You really did a good video here. Thanks.
Thank for u so much!
This is great! You have provided wonderful scientific information and managed to sound enthusiastic. I know that may seem like a left-handed compliment, but I’m very happy! Most speakers on UA-cam have this odd idea that to properly speak, they must sound monotone. They end up taking all the joy out of their topic. You do not do this.
I just read a small article about the JWST’s images of the Cartwheel Novae. I was fascinated, but it was a tiny piece, one of the first in it. You filled in a lot of missing information and I’m delighted by this and your delivery. Thank you so very much!
Yay!
Edit: Now that I've watched it I would like to thank you for the thorough explination. Your videos are always the best on any topic.
Really appreciate those kind words, thank you so much!
Thankyou for you videos ❤️
Enjoyed this video
Oh man, this has to be the best time in history to be alive and curious, thanks Christian, you kindle my curiosity in a most gratifying way! The wheel is turning and you can't slow down.....
As always, fantastic video!!👏🏻👏🏻
Thanks!
Hi Christian,Great Video And Detail,Im Excited To See Everything From This Scope,Just Wished People Werent So Jumpy With Finding Life..And More True Videos Around,Thank You Very Much,God Bless and Clear Skies❤️🙏🏻🔭✨🌏
Couple of years ago you did such a beautiful job explaining the billion to one magnification possible with "gravitational lensing," With your skills, (and I've heard nowhere else) a description of with the new JWST or otherwise "How they can determine how much dark matter is involved in curving the path of light from distant galaxies" I can imagine during a solar eclipse seeing a star in a position deflected from it's known position with and without the close proximity of the sun to it's direct path from that star. But for that to be seen and known, objects move rapidly with respect to the geometry involved, BUT long distances, and slow motion of these nebulous clouds of dark matter near the paths of light from distant galaxies, my mental faculties are severely challenged. Not knowing where these galaxies really are due to the path of light being so strongly gravimetrically influenced by some unknown amount of dark matter near the path of light? The question I ask is, "How can they calculate the mass of the dark matter influencing that light path?" Could you please explain the math, the geometry,
Adjacent topic, Hubble, I've heard light is red-shifted as it travels from distant locations to us. (Presumes Doppler-Shifted by velocity recession of distant objects) Is it possible that a photon circumventing all the gravimetric objects interceding between the source and us, causing that photons path be turned and deflected by every near mass to it's path, "LOSES SOME ENERGY" to every mass that deflects it. I mean every mass that deflects it is also deflected by it. Every micro black hole, every atom, electron, proton etc, WOULD BE MOVED SOME MICROSCOPIC AMOUNT towards the centerline of that photon's path, gaining some energy from that photon, SLOWING IT'S FREQUENCY, lengthening it's wavelength, making it appear red-shifted? The illusion that our math creates is that the source of that photon must be receding from us at ever increasing speed, but maybe the fact of the matter is that the mass of all near the photon's path is resonating and absorbing energy, momentum from that photon? The nearby masses are being "RUNG" by the influence of that photon going by. I'm thinking about VERY SMALL AMOUNTS OF ENERGY, but who ever thought orbiting objects could dissipate the rotational energy of stellar masses to excite LIGO? Somehow light(ElectroMagneticWaves) and gravity ARE RELATED. The double slot experiment, duality of particle and wave, I think of the 'radiometer" balanced white vs black vanes turning in a vacuum. There's an impact there between the photon and the vanes! THE PATH OF LIGHT IS NOT A STRAIGHT LINE, but rather a perpetually curving path, following the gradient between the masses around it, and I might propose constantly losing slight amounts of energy, every mass that is deflected from it's position or trajectory. (THEREBY REDDENING!) every curvature imparts an impulse to the center of mass dodged!
I'd appreciate a response to these two concepts. Of all the folks I know I believe you certainly "HAVE THE COMPOS MENTIS" to reply constructively and intelligently, and can maybe recommend one who could reply in language I might understand. Thanks Prof. ... ( by the way, I'm awed by the complexity of the concept with which you deal.)
I have two competing stories for the turning of the photon path near a concentrated mass:
1. the nonzero mass of the photon is drawn towards the center of the concentrated mass or
2. as the wavefront of the photon passes lower on the center of the gravity well, the side of the wavefront deeper in the gravity well is slowed more than the side higher on the well slowing it less, thereby causing the turn.
R.S.V.P. I value your help! Thanks.
I'm a bit unhappy that it is near a year later, and there have been no responses to my questions above. Like no one is listening? Oh well. There is no echo out in space, well not that we can hear. There may be super low infra sound, like gravity waves? of one atom per 100 cubic yards. A tree falling in the woods?
awesome video
Beautiful galaxy
Wow. You're one of my heroes
You’re so kind, thanks!
Thanks!
Thank you so kindly!
Mind blowing
Amazing image.👍👍👍
Thank you so much for this very detailed and in-depth video! I was a bit disappointed when I saw the NIRCam image of Stephan's Quintet - I actually thought the old Hubble image was more detailed and simply looked better, so until the comparison at 6:52 I wasn't exactly sure of what Webb was able to do that Hubble wasn't with images of relatively nearby galaxies.
Nice video. What’s the beautiful pinwheel galaxy off to the right of the cartwheel galaxy?
One of the MANY galaxies in the background. Every image include a deep field for free :)
Thank you for the update, Chris! I was wondering if dark matter is taken into account with the simulations of colliding galaxies? Thank you!
Thanks Galaxia. DM wasn’t mentioned in the paper I read but I wouldn’t be surprised if an ideal model would need a DM halo to recreate everything just exactly perfectly.
All those galaxies
That pic of Fritz Zwicky always reminds me of Grandpa from the Munsters. Sorry, my bad!🙂. Oh, awesome vid BTW!🙂
lol, thanks! And yeah, Zwicky was a nutty guy :)
@@LaunchPadAstronomy Normal in the box is boring ......Zwicky out of the box nutty was very inventive ....He came up with the idea for some kind of dark matter to account for observed galaxy rotation weirdness .....
For all the astro porn we've had so far they should have named it the Larry Flynt Space Telescope.
G2 galaxy looks almost prefect 👌
This James Webb Telescope, I one of the very few good things that happened during those bad years. Bravo to all
This video kinda makes me want to hear more about chandra tbh
Chandra is a pretty amazing telescope. Hmm…
Fritz kinda looks like a stand up comedian in that photo
He was quite a character :)
JWST needs to take a pic of G3.
What are the two galaxies to the left of the cartwheel galaxy
OK, Question answered later in the video.
Can we tell if the ring is expanding faster than the escape velocity? Or will it collapse back into a spiral?
No 4k upload?
Would anyone be down to help build a site that makes it dead simple to look at and interact with the Webb data? Also show the upcoming targets in a way that most people can understand. Idk just seems like a great opportunity to build something cool for everyone.
NASA?
@@thebigpicture2032 sure but I mean a non nasa partner built thing.
@Launch Pad Astronomy So how much of the night sky has been imaged by telescopes?
Are there any sections of the visible universe that astronomers haven't yet looked at, for one reason or another?
It depends on which telescope you mention. For example, HST just imaged less than 1% of night sky in the last 32 years, but many survey telescopes like LSST could survey entire night sky in just 3 days
The observable universe is a very different thing to the night sky, it's enormous and Webb itself is seeing more distant things than we have seen before. The visible universe with telescopes is at least 90 billion light years across.
Every part of the sky has been imaged. How deep is another matter.
@@TuNguyen-vu1cg Yes, that's the kind of answer I wanted! The other 2 are vague or obvious. Now I want more reading on this topic of depth versus breadth of telescopes.
most of the visible sky has been catalogued, there are different catalogues of stars available, a telescope catalogue gives list of stars that it imaged, ESA's Gaia telescope has largest star catalogue, with each improved telescope preliminary explorations from previous telescope catalogues are done and candidates are selected for future exploration
I don't understand that shockwave analogy. Galaxies are not solid objects. They are mostly empty space between stars. During collision huge majority of stars would just pass through empty space between. For shockwave to occur there has to be some explosion that would push all those stars and dust to the edge.
10:00 How is dark matter affected in these milieus? Does it get blown away?
What does F-Number-W signify? Thanks
It's the name of the filter. The "F" signifies filter, the numbers represent wavelengths in microns when divided by 10, and the "W" signifies "wide band".
Did you get a camera upgrade?
Nope same as before. Always trying to tweak though :)
Did some stars survive the accident?
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
It's like an italian pizza
They mentioned "Hubble" they mention "James Webb", What about the *Magellan* telescope what am I missing ?
Not in space?
🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
It's the Blender logo ! 😅😂
I can't believe Webb haven't photographed Betelguese yet
You can write a proposal to take a photograph of Betelguese by JWST :)))) and pray it'll be accepted
Like Imaging the dust cloud erupted in the Great Dimming :))))
It might be on the list of planned observations.
A quick google, and some commenters suggest it might be too bright for Webb's sensors to handle.
Why so few new webb images?
Most of the researchers get a 12 month exclusive to the data so they can make analysis and then write and publish any papers. After the 12 months the images become public. That's pretty common with telescopes.
@@TheEvilmooseofdoom Doesn't seem fair. Taxpayer pays for webb.
I dont see why images have to be kept secret for a year. Releasing them sooner wouldn't stop the researchers doing their work on them
@@pobinr Fair? They're not taking post cards for tourists. It's a scientific instrument. Releasing them sooner allows others to potentially scoup the original scientists in terms of publication.
@@TheEvilmooseofdoom it's not a bomoetiton. Fk scientists egos, share the images right away.
Won't effect their research
@@pobinr It's not ego.. Clearly you have no actual idea how things work in the research world. You're starting to get silly.
Where are the newer James Webb images. They seem to be coming out much slower than I would have expected. How long does it take to point that thing and take a picture? I have been looking for them, but all I can find are Hubble images being passed off as James Webb images. You can tell they are Hubble because they have four spikes instead of the tell-tale six spikes. Kink of pisses me off how dishonest they are being.
I still don't understand what is in the center of the galaxy.
The more and the farther we see, we will find out that we will never know the ultimate truth.
Wonder if there is any kind of life.
It has been a month and I feel like they gave us breadcrumbs once and now we can go and..
You won't won't see a lot of images for a year except for the ones being done for the PD and those will only be in between science time.
@@TheEvilmooseofdoom Since its project for all of us what is a reason behind it?
@@vieczurable The researchers (not all) who book time on the telescope get 1 year exclusive access to the data for research and publication purposes. That's pretty common.
@@TheEvilmooseofdoom Thank you for clarification. I understood they granted exclusive access as a right to select most interesting targets but not sharing images for any reason doesn't sound neither good nor right idea.
If they detected life in the universe. Would they tell us? Could something like that be kept secret?
No, it couldn’t and wouldn’t be “kept secret”.
Us humans are so insignificant.....a passing faze ....poof ....gone....
Dead Head 🌞
Born and raised on the Bus.
I'm giving up, 50% of the video are commercials/advertising.
BS! There is no way for anyone to know things about this galaxy. I want to see what's out there as much as you but let's do it without the BS.
It’s been studied pretty extensively since 1941. I think we’ve worked out a few things about it in that time.
It's nothing but BS on this channel, Best Science! Lol
Just because it's beyond your ability to understand, doesn't make it BS. Reality isn't restricted to the limits of your understanding. That's a you problem.