RVV-SD Medium-range air-to-air missile

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
  • RVV-SD is an air-to-air medium-range missile that is designed to engage aerial targets (fighters, bombers, strikers, military-transport aircraft and cruise missiles) around-the-clock, from any aspect, in ECM environment, against background of earth or water, including multi-channel firing according to “fire-and-forget” principle.
    The missile is created on the basis of the RVV-AE missile, it has increased maximum range at front hemisphere up to 110 km and enhanced noise immunity.
    For more information about the RVV-SD Medium-range air-to-air missile visit Rosoboronexport official website (www.roe.ru).
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 79

  • @sejauhtimurdaribarat7085
    @sejauhtimurdaribarat7085 Рік тому +8

    next make review about RVV-BD / R-37M air-to-air missile
    with Kh-59Mk and Kh-59Mk2 air-to-ground and air-to-surface anti ship missiles

  • @AlgeriaAviation
    @AlgeriaAviation Рік тому +10

    That's the one!! Don't forget the RVV-BD!

    • @herohero-fw1vc
      @herohero-fw1vc Рік тому +2

      This is the best medium AAM in the world.

  • @tareqahmedmojumder8632
    @tareqahmedmojumder8632 Рік тому +13

    EXCELLENT 💝🇷🇺❤️

    • @pitmarkovic4545
      @pitmarkovic4545 Рік тому

      😂🎉they need more Poeple than youfor Future

  • @aviator77migsukhoi34
    @aviator77migsukhoi34 Рік тому +4

    RVV-SD is the commercial name for the new R-77-1 ( military designation ) or Product 170-1 ( producer's designation). It is in serial production from 2015 in Moscow's plant GosMKB 'Vympel'. In fact, this is russian modified version of the old soviet R-77 ( project RVV-AE) with only russian components and parts. So far, they produced several thousends of them. R-77-1 is in operational use from the beginning of 2016.
    One of the main differences between the old R-77 and the new R-77-1 is in the solid fuel rocket engine. R-77-1 has single-stage solid fuel rocket engine as old R-77/E ( R-77E for export is serial and operational ) but with more fuel and new chamber .That is the reason why is R-77-1 heavier then R-77/E for around 20kgs. New rocket engine has also new more narrow nozzle( can be seen at 0:38) which gives more thrust ( total pulse ), thus R-77-1 has much better energetic/kinematic potential. Vmax or max true air speed of the missile is almost 5 Mach.With old R-77/E it is possible to engage big incoming air target( bigger frontal RCS) from max 80 kms ( as max authorised launch distance with launch parameter 'Dr max 1' ). With new R-77-1 all of this is possible from about 100 kms and it is in the same level of the US AAM AIM-120D AMRAAM.
    Also there is difference between radar seekers. R-77E has only active radar seeker type 9B1348E ( for ARH/guidance in terminal phase of flight) ,but new R-77-1 has completely new dual mode active radar seeker type 9B1103M-200PA with ARH mode (works in Ku-band or in the 12-18GHz frequency range) as the main one and additional SARH mode ( works in X-band or in the 8-12GHz frequency range ). Both modes can work separately or even simultaneosly .It is very hard and practicaly impossible to jamm this radar seeker when both modes work simultaneosly .
    Besides radar seeker type 9B1103M-200PS , R-77-1 possess another one and it is type 9B1103M-200PS where we have passive mode ( PRH-passive radar homing on the radar illumination source) besides active radar homing mode .
    This version of R-77-1 can be used in complete radio-silence combat mode. Besides those two subversions ,R-77-1 also has another two subversions ,one with radar proximity fuse and another with optical (laser) proximity fuse. Export version R-77-1EL ( operational in Chinese PLAAF and Indian IAF from 2018 ) has only laser proximity fuse. There is some more difference between old R-77/E and new R-77-1, Product 170-1 has two-way data-link ( max range of the radio-correcting channel is 60kms ),has better new INS or BINS ( strapdown INS ),has much better ECM-resistance and better HOJ-mode posibilities.
    When we talk about flight-maneuvering characteristics ,they are the same as of R-77 and I wrote some data here in the topic about RVV-AE or old R-77/E .
    ua-cam.com/video/1JnodV47GEA/v-deo.html

    • @aramisone7198
      @aramisone7198 Рік тому +2

      They need to make a ramjet dual puls version like the Meteor and thrust vector nossles so the missile can manuover .

    • @aviator77migsukhoi34
      @aviator77migsukhoi34 Рік тому +1

      @@aramisone7198 Yes,they made it and it is Product 180 or R-87 ( falsely called K-77M) as first in the world hypersonic cruise AAM.

    • @matthewlewis-zw3tf
      @matthewlewis-zw3tf Рік тому +2

      Thank you for sharing your knowledge. ❤😊

    • @CREELAST
      @CREELAST 9 місяців тому

      The r77m is the most advanced, right? even more than r-77-1

    • @aviator77migsukhoi34
      @aviator77migsukhoi34 9 місяців тому +1

      @@CREELAST R-77M does not exicst as real AAM. There is R-77-1 ( Product 170-1) and R-77-2 ( Product 171-1) only for Su-57. R-77M will be the new AAM with retractable stabilisers for Su-75's fuselage weapon compartments . All best

  • @fgtrhwu2
    @fgtrhwu2 Рік тому +4

    Nice it's in English, keep this up

  • @NidhinKn-bs5zp
    @NidhinKn-bs5zp 4 місяці тому +2

    Very very good weapon ✨.

  • @abirmahmud3809
    @abirmahmud3809 8 місяців тому +1

    Most Handsome Marketing Officer

  • @vidbobanec8384
    @vidbobanec8384 2 місяці тому

    For those wondering it's the r77-1 as far as I'm aware

  • @currymuncher4090
    @currymuncher4090 Рік тому +7

    I love the rafakle, ef-typhoon, f16 and other nato aircraft being taken down.

    • @herptim
      @herptim Рік тому +1

      Nice change of pace from most youtube demonstrations of "best" NATO equipment huh?

    • @trumanhw
      @trumanhw Рік тому +1

      Well, I actually liked them (just only for defense). Sadly, our days of our military being the contemporary-misnomer of a _dept of defense_ hasn't existed since WWII, which previously as ironically called the Dept of War. Now? We're just a bunch of bellicose assholes. Obviously we care about our servicemen; I'm a Marine vet, of course I do. But our gov has become too belligerent, too hostile, too immoral and too flagrantly hypocritical, constantly lying. BUT, the key to this drastic shift relied on a media that ceased to even pretend to be objective after 2010 and kicked in overdrive in 2016. Which (counterintuitively) is good in some ways, as they made it easy for people not interested in politics (except those with most confirmation bias) to clearly see what freaking LIARS they are.
      Not that it changes anything, but I think the absolute homogeneity in the dogmacrat congress tells us something; bc who in their right minds believes so many people could agree about anything without some coercive force demanding acquiescence to this orthodoxy..? Yes, they've always pressured congressman with dirty tricks, but I think the CIA & FBI makes it their priority to find not only career ending dirt, but criminality to hang over these people's heads to ensure lockstep. Thus, what they're doing to Trump is just more of the same to the insiders, as it is consistent with the NYT both disseminating classified materials FROM the regime, and approving prosecution of Snowden and Assange.
      Most of the time ideological biases is enough. But it's in those rare cases where a Barbara Lee (the ONLY vote against the Patriot Act in 2001) might challenge their religious tenets like men can get pregnant and its good to have trans-ies in the military (despite the obvious prohibition on people with suicidal ideation or mental disorders) that are completely eradicated from the Left.
      WHO believes such nonsense with such unanimity !?? This to me is inferential proof that they're coerced, and thus, the illusion of democracy is that much smaller. Just as we knew Ukrop nazis explicitly threatened Zelensky with hanging him if he made peace with RU ... these people are ideological terrorists who've hijacked our nation and any sanity that used to exist. Sadly, whether I'm right or wrong is academic, bc whatever the truth actually is, the facts are the same.

  • @vadim-2068
    @vadim-2068 Рік тому +10

    Awesome Work 💪❤

  • @baronesselcohen-it9ll
    @baronesselcohen-it9ll Рік тому +2

    for next , please making review about the most Russian powerfull cluster bomb RBK-500U OFAB-50UD and RBK-500U BETAB-M

  • @ezequielsoria005
    @ezequielsoria005 Рік тому +9

    Increiblee. Vamos rusia!!

  • @typhoon2643
    @typhoon2643 Рік тому +10

    Magnifique Russie😍👍

  • @austinmclaen4007
    @austinmclaen4007 Рік тому +2

    It’s working so great in Ukraine

  • @Specnaz19917806
    @Specnaz19917806 Рік тому +1

    "R-77" 110 km! I Need to come back to Flanker 2.5 game

  • @krultepes57
    @krultepes57 4 місяці тому

    Rvv-sd is the R77-1?!

  • @mikeabuyeka998
    @mikeabuyeka998 Рік тому +2

    There's another called K-77M

    • @aviator77migsukhoi34
      @aviator77migsukhoi34 Рік тому

      There is no AAM with designation K-77M but there is new AAM called Product 180 ( only for new Su-57). Military designation is R-87. By the way, letter K is used for test version of some new AAM and letter R is for serial/operational version.

  • @fingerprint8479
    @fingerprint8479 Рік тому +2

    Forgiving terrorists and traitors is God's business.
    The duty of the Russian military is to send them to him!
    Vladimir Putin.

  • @yacob5434
    @yacob5434 Рік тому

    next making review for Kh-58UShKE anti radar missile and Grom-E1/Kh-36 air-to-surface missile

  • @RamiroRizzo-t9z
    @RamiroRizzo-t9z Рік тому

    😊😊 excelente Messi muy buena tecnología de vanguardia algún día pueda comprar productos federación rusa

  • @nafikhan8205
    @nafikhan8205 Рік тому +1

    Can it be exported to other countries?

    • @enhancedutility266
      @enhancedutility266 Рік тому +2

      Yes I mean this channel is a video illustration for what they sell on the international market for weapon systems

    • @aviator77migsukhoi34
      @aviator77migsukhoi34 Рік тому

      Of course, Chinese PLAAF already has R-77-1EL for their Su-35 and Indian IAF has R-77-1EL for their Su-30MKI. 'EL' means export-laser ,so that version has laser proximity fuse.

  • @angshu975
    @angshu975 Рік тому

    Modernized this missile with stealth coating airframe, hypersonic speed engines,

    • @trumanhw
      @trumanhw Рік тому

      Disagreed: It needs a 2nd stage to ensure high-velocity terminal performance and an AI (machine learning) algorithm to avoid ground clutter and confusion by EW. There's also an IR version I believe (a WVR missile) which should use AI or ML to learn to avoid flares, too. Presently, missiles are often defeatable by jet's superior energy / kinematics and due to limitations in guidance. It'd be most ideal to use the tandem guidance from within the missile in conjunction with a second perspective to disambiguate the target's location...which RU jets are often better situated to do bc they have multiple radars facing not only forward and sides (cheeks in the PIKA-M radar I think) ... but also I believe some have them in the rear "stinger."
      All of your ideas are good, but I don't think they're as important as those I mentioned; stealth doesn't matter much when the UV from the motor makes it obvious ... even the AIM-54 was 'hypersonic' (kinematically); but it'd still have a very low probability of intercept.
      What I'd really like to see is RU frantically upgrading it's RADAR across the board from PESA to AESA (if not with GaN). And even upgrading Su-30x and Su-34x and Su-35x to have modernized cockpits ... all of which is useless unless they make equivalent investments in the salary to their pilots (they lose too many to airlines), increased hours per year ... and absolutely investing heavily into Flight Simulators, which are apparently not only old but too few. Likewise, as much as RU has very good SAM systems, they should cooperate with China and India in a project to make absolutely superior SAM which are invulnerable to SEAD. And, they must either make their EW adequate to destroy over 95% of drones (UVAC, UAV, etc) or make them adequate for less expensive AAA to destroy them.
      While RU may have the best EW in the world, that's limited to ground EW. They absolutely NEED aircraft (ideally in 2 seater Cy-34, which they'd need to make hundreds more of) for aviation EW. It's not enough to deter the US with threats of destroying the planet; they need the conventional means to obliterate any misguided belligerence of the US / NATO without engaging in a suicide pact.
      Right now, they have an absolute industrial advantage. But that only matters if the conflict is protractive. If the US / NATO were able to levy an incredibly succinct attack, the industrial advantage doesn't matter. And that means protecting their SAM and being able to contest the skies. Right now, RU lacks the quality to compete on a 1-to-1 basis, and (if claims about the F-35 and F-22 kill ratios in Red Flag are even remotely true), may suffer losses of 10:1 ... and the US combat inventory is over 2,500 jets. And that's ignoring NATO in its entirety; but the Rafale, Gripen, Eurofighter, etc., are all very capable aircraft ... in addition to another 1000+ F-16 they have. So even if RU could preserve a 1:1 kill ratio (which is optimistic in the extreme), they'd be in severe trouble. And things like drones could exhaust their (outstanding) capacity to mfr missiles without adequate EW, directed energy and AAA to neutralize them ... of which, requires a massive proliferation of RADAR devices as well as modernizing / upgrading them to detect smaller and slower moving objects ... which are difficult to detect without efforts to make them low observable (stealth).
      While idiots in the US like Sandboxx news and Cappy (Task & Purpose) berate RU bc their tech isn't as good and their pilots don't get as much training (which has much less to do with RU ability and has everything to do with the priority RU places on a massive military budget) ... in reality, the US appears to be demanding that Russia make themselves much much more difficult to get belligerent with. Bc RU knows they're never more than 4 years or a dishonest election away from having both a compliant / bought and paid for media parroting the military industry's talking points to get us into a war ... as we did in Ukraine. Anyone who thinks it's "unprovoked" or that it was a surprise should ask themselves why the US was conducting surveys of Crimean residents about whether they identified as Russians or Ukrainians (shocker: ~85% said either autonomous or Russian, and that was before a bunch of nazis hijacked the leader the donbas and crimea overwhelmingly elected even according to Wikipedia) ... AND!! Even asked them if they thought "violence" was an acceptable means of protest! Just search for these two PDFs if you want to see the United States own funded surveys which absolutely prove that Crimea's elections absolutely reflected a truthful survey of the people to want to join Russia and be members of a Russian trade association:
      • Public Opinion Survey Residents of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea May 16 - 30, 2013
      • Extending Russia - Competing from Advantageous Ground by the RAND corporation
      US combat aircrafts (excludes drones, etc):
      USMC:
      FA-18 270
      F-35B 57
      AV-8B 95
      NAVY:
      EA-18G 155
      FA-18E 500
      F-35C 118
      Air Force
      F-15E 218
      F-15D 234
      F-16 775
      F-22 177
      F-35 196

  • @SueliTeixeiraRodrigues
    @SueliTeixeiraRodrigues 6 місяців тому

    🇧🇷✔️

  • @aramisone7198
    @aramisone7198 Рік тому

    India is not so happy with the R77 i red somewhere and its to much corruption so it effects quality sometimes.

  • @jaskong5093
    @jaskong5093 Рік тому +8

    God Bless #Russia...
    slava Russia,Uurraa... !!🇷🇺🇧🇾💪💪💪👍👍👍

  • @the.parks.of.no.return
    @the.parks.of.no.return Рік тому +3

    Maybe you need something to shoot down SAMs and other air to air missiles ie the aircraft can defend itself from manpads and "stealth" aircraft?

  • @dedyzee
    @dedyzee Рік тому +2

    Let's try in Ukraine

    • @aviator77migsukhoi34
      @aviator77migsukhoi34 Рік тому +2

      New R-77-1 is used very successfully in ukr from the beginning of the SMO with high launch/hit ratio. Several tens of ukr combat aircraft is already shot down with this AAM.

    • @thicucnguyen8150
      @thicucnguyen8150 11 місяців тому

      Nga sử dụng tên lửa này để phá hủy Mig-29 Ukaine. 🇺🇦

  • @kuidezso8465
    @kuidezso8465 Рік тому +2

    CONGRATULATION RUSSIA CONSTANLY UPGRADE ALL ARMY 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
    ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
    OLD WAR STILE FIGHT *

  • @nishantshrivastava9674
    @nishantshrivastava9674 Рік тому +1

    Do something for Chinese PL15 or else Russia will loose its market in middle east, south east asia and Africa.
    Pl15 uses dual pulsed rocket motor which gives it range over 180 kms.
    What stops Russia doing that?? 🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️
    Israelis r now using 3 pulsed rocket motor for their new BVRAAM Sky Spear with approx 200kms range.

    • @garryb374
      @garryb374 Рік тому +4

      Nothing stops them at all, this is for export. The R-77M has multistage rocket motor and extended range, but it is not as urgent for Russia because they already have the R-37M with 400km launch range from the MiG-31 that can also be used at reduced range from the Su-30/34/35/57 and MiG-35. Export model of the R-37M is RVV-BD, whose range is 200km and is for export. What they wont be talking about is a scramjet powered missile a class above Meteor...

    • @nishantshrivastava9674
      @nishantshrivastava9674 Рік тому

      @@garryb374 R37 is a heavy long range AAM and I don't think.. It's available for export.. I haven't heard it was offered to any single country.

    • @nishantshrivastava9674
      @nishantshrivastava9674 Рік тому

      @@garryb374 I was talking specifically about Export market.. I know Russia has R37 bt we have only 2 options RVV AE 80 km and RVV SD 110 km.
      R 77M isn't available for export too.
      Now u tell me how we gonna counter J10C with PL 15 with Su 30mki and RVV SD??
      That's why Russia is loosing market.. They need to be proactive for export markets.

    • @aviator77migsukhoi34
      @aviator77migsukhoi34 Рік тому

      @@nishantshrivastava9674 There is export version of the new heavy, very long-range hypersonic R-37M ( Product 610M) ,it is Product 620 .

    • @aviator77migsukhoi34
      @aviator77migsukhoi34 Рік тому +1

      @@garryb374 Export version of R-37M is Product 620. It has max launch distance against big incoming target of 300kms ,in the same level as R-37M carried by the Su-35S e.g. Reason is simple,Su-35S or exported Su-35 can launch R-37M( ME) at max 18 kms of height with max launch speed 2.35 Mach. MiG-31BM on the other side can launch R-37M at 22kms of height with launch speed 3000km/h ( true air speed M 2.8 ) thus the max launch distance( launch parameter Dr max1) is 400kms.

  • @Rakibhossain-bq2qr
    @Rakibhossain-bq2qr Рік тому

    Russia need to improve the military technology

  • @lucianogomesgutierrez1629
    @lucianogomesgutierrez1629 Рік тому +1

    🇧🇷🇷🇺🇧🇾🇨🇳

  • @kiktor
    @kiktor Рік тому +1

    Интересно, а кому вы её собрались продавать, делая рекламу на английском языке...🤔

    • @maksimluzin1121
      @maksimluzin1121 Рік тому +5

      В Индии, например, английский - второй государственный язык. И не только Индия...

    • @kiktor
      @kiktor Рік тому +2

      @@maksimluzin1121 Ну тогда стоит задуматься, а такой ли уж союзник Индия для нас?

    • @maksimluzin1121
      @maksimluzin1121 Рік тому +2

      @@kiktor , Глупости! Это бывшая колония Британии. Это - история и культура. Не думай - у тебя это не получается...

    • @kiktor
      @kiktor Рік тому

      @@maksimluzin1121 Если ты серьёзно думаешь будто бы эту рекламу снимают для Индии, ориентируясь на её историю и культуру, то с башкой что-то у тебя.

    • @nishantshrivastava9674
      @nishantshrivastava9674 Рік тому +2

      ​@@kiktor Hello brother.. Even in my country people say why english.. Bt it's a reality that English is most spoken language around the world and we can almost communicate anywhere around the world with English.
      It's just a bridge of communication.. take it that way.
      Similarly I think Russian is very common mode of communication in Poland, Belarus, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Latavia, Lithuania, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and even in Goa ( India).
      🎉🎉

  • @eluhanQwerty
    @eluhanQwerty Рік тому

    Dislike por hablar en inglés 😀

    • @descentmvm
      @descentmvm Рік тому

      Why ? I'm from Canada and love watching these videos I wouldn't watch if it was Russian cause idk Russian 😂

  • @zeljkonisic5942
    @zeljkonisic5942 Рік тому +3

    SLAVA RUSSIA death fasizam