The United States Military vs One Imperial II Star Destroyer | Star Wars: Who Would Win

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 сер 2017
  • One Imperial Star Destroyer is transported to Earth and tasked with surviving over the continental United States for 24 hours - can the United States Military, including its arsenal of nuclear weapons, take it down in that time?
    With a powerful Navy, Air Force, and Army, the US Military is the strongest force on planet Earth. But, is the US Military powerful enough to destroy a single Imperial Star Destroyer? Empire vs America, Star Destroyer vs Nukes... Finds out which faction would come out on top on this episode of Star Wars: Who Would Win!
    ***
    Want to help the channel out?
    Consider donating so I can upgrade my hardware: goo.gl/DJX619
    Subscribe: goo.gl/vBao71
    Join the (superfun!) Discord: / discord
    And follow me on Twitter: goo.gl/i4BGcy!
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14 тис.

  • @kelsy7389
    @kelsy7389 6 років тому +9236

    Congrats on 32K, can't wait for you to get out of my closet.

    • @EckhartsLadder
      @EckhartsLadder  6 років тому +954

      Guess I'm gonna need an office to record in
      ;*

    • @JeanLucCaptain
      @JeanLucCaptain 6 років тому +189

      LIBERTY PRIME ONLINE, PRIMARY OBJECTIVE THE ELIMINATION OF ALL IMPERIAL NAVY AGGRESSORS!

    • @thelvadam2884
      @thelvadam2884 6 років тому +63

      Kels B
      Wtf? ! 😂😂👍

    • @gups6662
      @gups6662 6 років тому +109

      Get back in your closet. You get soup tonight, that is your reward

    • @Reybeeem
      @Reybeeem 6 років тому +56

      Kels B Can I live in your closet please?

  • @SkinnerNoah
    @SkinnerNoah 5 років тому +12917

    If a star destroyer appeared in the sky George Lucas would probably have some explaining to do lol

  • @Ztanto
    @Ztanto 3 роки тому +1499

    Darth Vaders gunna end up in Disney world, see some kid carrying a lightsaber, and get some crazy flashbacks

  • @demoniclemon9897
    @demoniclemon9897 3 роки тому +1444

    As if America doesn’t have their own star destroyer hidden away.

  • @alertedcoyote7892
    @alertedcoyote7892 3 роки тому +857

    Speaking as something of a military historian, the very last thing the US wants to do is detonate nuclear explosives within atmosphere directly above their own country, so I believe it would be an absolute last resort to use nuclear arms

    • @klazman7757
      @klazman7757 3 роки тому +56

      I was waiting to someone to mention this lmao

    • @warcrimes390
      @warcrimes390 3 роки тому +90

      The sun is a small price to pay for a epic explosion

    • @thearmoguy253
      @thearmoguy253 3 роки тому +20

      They did it over Hawaii and it EMP the whole island

    • @dmoneyswagg64
      @dmoneyswagg64 3 роки тому +33

      Exactly. The only was the us would launch nukes above the nation is if it was literally the last option.

    • @noahhathaway5065
      @noahhathaway5065 3 роки тому +12

      @@nbrohwer2001 yes they do care lmao. also it's not exactly hard to know what a nuke would so since they've gone through extensive testing

  • @hrthrhs
    @hrthrhs 4 роки тому +3201

    Star Destroyer appears over L.A.
    US Military: "weather balloon"

    • @GodOfPlague
      @GodOfPlague 3 роки тому +49

      Yeah if they pretend it doesn't exist then they can't lose to it perfect!

    • @Linty690R
      @Linty690R 3 роки тому +15

      Your comment made me laugh, thank you:-)

    • @fisherbrahler7329
      @fisherbrahler7329 3 роки тому +3

      Why don’t we just you know send a couple nukes and make it go boom

    • @strf90105
      @strf90105 3 роки тому +9

      hah. Battle of Los Angeles

    • @yamayolochannel8733
      @yamayolochannel8733 3 роки тому +4

      Yeah and have the risk of destroying America in the process

  • @matthew8629
    @matthew8629 4 роки тому +1698

    Star Destroyer attacks Earth: That's a lot of damage.
    Star Destroyer falls after being destroyed: How about a little more?

    • @cydonianmystery5193
      @cydonianmystery5193 4 роки тому +77

      I reckon the reactor alone exploding would do a lot of damage, and that's on top of the collateral damage and fallout of the US detonating nukes on its own soil. A good swath of the US would become uninhabitable.

    • @Defender78
      @Defender78 4 роки тому +30

      It would be like the environmental destruction caused by the remains of the death star plummeting onto the Ewoks planet after it gets heroically destroyed

    • @comradekarlvonschnitzelste8218
      @comradekarlvonschnitzelste8218 4 роки тому

      Matthew Varney if its been destroyed, it will be in pieces, meaning the atmosphere would tear it up, minimizing damage down a lot.

    • @e1357
      @e1357 4 роки тому +24

      @@comradekarlvonschnitzelste8218 At the altitudes described in the video, not much would actually burn up from friction with the atmosphere.
      That said, falling debris would be the least of our worries in this scenario, the fallout and collateral damage from the nuclear detonations alone would take decades to recover from, never mind the environmental impact of whatever coolants, fuel, and other foreign substances aboard that ship would have.

    • @day-breaker
      @day-breaker 3 роки тому +5

      tbh the US could harvest the remains of the sd

  • @melaniephelps2682
    @melaniephelps2682 3 роки тому +757

    US: finally defeat star destroyer
    “Sees Death Star entering atmosphere”

    • @johnisawesome18
      @johnisawesome18 3 роки тому +114

      Entering the atmosphere?!

    • @SkippyTheSpiteful
      @SkippyTheSpiteful 3 роки тому +154

      Dude I think you just crashed the Death Star

    • @brinchaser1313
      @brinchaser1313 3 роки тому +21

      @@SkippyTheSpiteful Dude, Where's my 'Star?

    • @freddovich7925
      @freddovich7925 3 роки тому +21

      "Well boys we still got 399 IBM's left, how many do we wanna spend on this fella?"

    • @gustavokaski
      @gustavokaski 3 роки тому +14

      Can we not nuke death star?

  • @michaelmckeever2734
    @michaelmckeever2734 3 роки тому +285

    Why does the US have so many nukes?
    US Military: "Incase an Imperial Star Destroyer shows up"

  • @toonterraminegamer1234
    @toonterraminegamer1234 3 роки тому +1687

    Military: George Lucas, how do we destroy it?
    George: idk, Disney changed the canon.

    • @rianmacdonald9454
      @rianmacdonald9454 3 роки тому +46

      best comment so far.

    • @parklez3250
      @parklez3250 3 роки тому +67

      George: you gotta destroy it with female, like Kathleen Kennedy said, the force is female

    • @otsutsukiindra2647
      @otsutsukiindra2647 3 роки тому +85

      @@parklez3250 Nice, us men don't have to fight them. It's women's problem now.

    • @DEAD_DOG
      @DEAD_DOG 3 роки тому +6

      LOL

    • @itbeclue8633
      @itbeclue8633 3 роки тому +4

      @@otsutsukiindra2647 LOL

  • @alexfoster9683
    @alexfoster9683 6 років тому +9835

    Could you do the U.S Military vs Obi-Wan Kenobi with the high ground

  • @darko9656
    @darko9656 3 роки тому +169

    Her: he’s probably cheating on me...
    Him: ......

  • @ZeddiLeppi
    @ZeddiLeppi 3 роки тому +508

    Empire: Let's send some troops down. These primitive savages couldn't possibly be able to-
    White Phosphorus: *Sup*

    • @ZeddiLeppi
      @ZeddiLeppi 3 роки тому +6

      @fatbussy swag Just throw those weird, green, metal rocks at them.

    • @prowarlord12e66
      @prowarlord12e66 3 роки тому +6

      Muh muh mufreebrams

    • @rianmacdonald9454
      @rianmacdonald9454 3 роки тому +7

      dam. that shit is nasty.

    • @ygotsvlog3762
      @ygotsvlog3762 3 роки тому +7

      Explosions:any way i start boom boom boom

    • @ZeddiLeppi
      @ZeddiLeppi 3 роки тому +31

      @andrew brackenbury No one's probably going to give much of a damn about the geneva convention when there probably won't be anything left for the geneva convention to hold purpose to.

  • @spaghetti6581
    @spaghetti6581 4 роки тому +2067

    Star Destroyer: *appears *
    Florida man: *NOW THIS LOOKS LIKE A JOB FOR ME*

    • @alphyy3304
      @alphyy3304 4 роки тому +33

      DEPLOY THE JROTC KIDS

    • @mayhaps801
      @mayhaps801 4 роки тому +8

      Florida Woman: *TIME TO OVERTHROW FLORIDA MAN*

    • @spaghetti6581
      @spaghetti6581 4 роки тому +30

      @@mayhaps801 "Ah a worthy opponent. Our battle shall be legendary!"

    • @pradeeptamu6858
      @pradeeptamu6858 4 роки тому

      @AlexTheBlueWolf YT u watch him?

    • @vonspeedwagon1466
      @vonspeedwagon1466 3 роки тому

      git the guns and the bud light Betty

  • @riddlemethat4911
    @riddlemethat4911 5 років тому +1861

    “What is that coming to destroy us?”
    “A single gonk droid, sir.”
    “RETREAT IMMEDIATELY”

  • @rocketman7295
    @rocketman7295 3 роки тому +127

    Did we search for this? No
    Did we watch? Yes

  • @TheMiningMeteor
    @TheMiningMeteor 3 роки тому +51

    “So please don’t crucify me if I make any mistakes.” That line has earned you a sub. Love it.

  • @ascherlafayette8572
    @ascherlafayette8572 4 роки тому +1441

    Someone just yell
    "There's oil on that ship!"
    And allow freedom to kick in.

    • @wynnadorno6132
      @wynnadorno6132 3 роки тому +76

      The U.S would demolish the star destroyer if you said that shit

    • @mrtortoise3766
      @mrtortoise3766 3 роки тому +50

      *SPACE OIL*

    • @brodymadden75
      @brodymadden75 3 роки тому +21

      *tactical nuke inbound*

    • @toonterraminegamer1234
      @toonterraminegamer1234 3 роки тому +8

      If they blow it up then there won’t be any more oil left.

    • @djp-el5tv
      @djp-el5tv 3 роки тому +51

      @@toonterraminegamer1234 if we can’t have any oil they can’t either

  • @seranade3976
    @seranade3976 5 років тому +1972

    "Did I hear Space oil?"

    • @bluenightfury4365
      @bluenightfury4365 5 років тому +35

      That's the Empire in a nutshell when a ISD appears over a planet.

    • @nistorlaurentiu7533
      @nistorlaurentiu7533 4 роки тому +8

      nukes...INCOMING

    • @notrius7754
      @notrius7754 4 роки тому +9

      yeah Empire is fucked now

    • @JoshAllenberg
      @JoshAllenberg 4 роки тому +13

      *OH SAY CAN YOU SEE*
      *BY THE DAWN'S EARLY LIGHT*

    • @floridaball4896
      @floridaball4896 4 роки тому +9

      Yeah rip the empire, died because the us knew it had oil

  • @theNerevarine090
    @theNerevarine090 3 роки тому +386

    U.S scientists: alien transmission!
    U.S people: HURRAYYYY!!!
    Palpatine: *hello there*

  • @reiboul
    @reiboul 3 роки тому +206

    Considering they defeated a destroyer by assaulting with frigging cavalry, I'd say there is a chance....

    • @euankenobi3517
      @euankenobi3517 3 роки тому +44

      We don’t talk about that

    • @_R_R_R
      @_R_R_R 3 роки тому +9

      And those were bigger too

    • @TravelerZ24
      @TravelerZ24 3 роки тому +7

      Just wait til the winged hussars arrive

    • @mattsnith3855
      @mattsnith3855 3 роки тому +1

      Wait what

    • @reiboul
      @reiboul 3 роки тому +18

      @@mattsnith3855 don't ever watch episode 9 :'(

  • @johnburrill2625
    @johnburrill2625 5 років тому +1228

    Star destroyer: enters atmosphere
    Minuteman III: I'm about do destroy this mans whole career

    • @KJ-is5ug
      @KJ-is5ug 5 років тому +17

      Let’s hope the star destroyer defense didn’t have enough time to react.

    • @jrreidgaminggamer8080
      @jrreidgaminggamer8080 4 роки тому +2

      Nah the muniteman IX

    • @stephenwalker1659
      @stephenwalker1659 4 роки тому +43

      They dont need to 100% accurate, that's the glory of a 50 megaton warhead lmao

    • @willaverynerdyclarinetist6131
      @willaverynerdyclarinetist6131 4 роки тому +8

      @@stephenwalker1659 Now hold ya horses m8. They still have those shields! Although now I'm curious, how many nukes would it take to pierce a Star destroyer's shield...

    • @augustusclaudiusvenorius6292
      @augustusclaudiusvenorius6292 4 роки тому +4

      How do.you know 50 megatons would even phase them? And where in any nations' arsenal are there 50 MT warheads, let alone ANY that can be delivered by missile?
      A hint: they don't exist :)

  • @greennitricoxide2706
    @greennitricoxide2706 4 роки тому +1529

    one bird flies into the star destroyers engines
    *wasted*

    • @cptray-steam
      @cptray-steam 4 роки тому +55

      People of earth start cheering thanking the bird for its sacrifice.

    • @cancelanime1507
      @cancelanime1507 4 роки тому +24

      I doubt that would do anything lol

    • @cacogunky3032
      @cacogunky3032 4 роки тому +46

      Birds are the deadliest creature on earth

    • @heyimgayalso6129
      @heyimgayalso6129 4 роки тому +28

      Anakin Skywalker it’s a joke since birds are known for being able of damaging airliner engines

    • @polizeitroisdorf1422
      @polizeitroisdorf1422 4 роки тому +3

      Green nitricoxide or on the bridge

  • @Withlovefrominterent
    @Withlovefrominterent 2 роки тому +19

    The real Achilles heel of the Empire is the legendary incompetence of Star Destroyer ship commanders. For a Star Destroyer to find itself within the atmosphere of a planet it means to destroy, within range of both ground and normal air forces, pretty much says it all.

    • @ZC.Andrew
      @ZC.Andrew Рік тому

      Lol we can expect nothing less from these commanders. They are their own worst enemies.

  • @alexmaffei7386
    @alexmaffei7386 3 роки тому +30

    Ah yes, when a massive at-at is walking on the beach, everyone is just chilling on the background

  • @BumAssNigga408
    @BumAssNigga408 3 роки тому +812

    I can just imagine the CIA questioning George Lucas about how to destroy it

    • @petarcubrilo5030
      @petarcubrilo5030 3 роки тому +98

      The numbers George! What do the numbers mean?

    • @nayeemhaque1064
      @nayeemhaque1064 3 роки тому +71

      GL: you know this is fiction, right?!
      CIA: yes, yes “fiction”. Let’s say if it was real.....

    • @toonterraminegamer1234
      @toonterraminegamer1234 3 роки тому +76

      “George, your idea didn’t work!”
      George: Disney must have changed the canon. Sorry guys.

    • @BumAssNigga408
      @BumAssNigga408 3 роки тому +5

      @@toonterraminegamer1234 who do they ask now?

    • @Catmando1
      @Catmando1 3 роки тому +13

      @@BumAssNigga408 mickey mouse

  • @king_goose
    @king_goose 3 роки тому +1103

    Everybody gangsta until the whole imperial Fleet arrives.

    • @defaultyturtle2237
      @defaultyturtle2237 3 роки тому +70

      Tsar bomb mass production has entered the chat

    • @beanjuice4263
      @beanjuice4263 3 роки тому +82

      if the entire imperial fleet arrives somewhere that means its climax time and we'll have our friendly protagonists show up to save the day. Might lose a continent or two tho

    • @TheRealUNGOC
      @TheRealUNGOC 3 роки тому +29

      i just realized 1 nuke could destroy the entire final order fleet since their shields were off

    • @toastbraot7053
      @toastbraot7053 3 роки тому +9

      @@TheRealUNGOC if they don't stay outside of the atmosphere. And forget to bring the death star

    • @medakakurokami2772
      @medakakurokami2772 3 роки тому +2

      Oh no not the seventh fleet!

  • @Jayozranger
    @Jayozranger 3 роки тому +20

    Honestly, even if we did destroy the star destroyer, it would basically be the
    “We did it, Patrick, we saved the city!”

  • @dan-ez8lg
    @dan-ez8lg 3 роки тому +270

    Star Destroyer appears.
    US Military: “how do we destroy it?”
    Kathleen Kennedy: “I got this, fam”
    Proceeds to destroy Star Wars.

    • @hugosuarez1395
      @hugosuarez1395 3 роки тому +12

      I mean you’re not wrong

    • @GrampsandMates
      @GrampsandMates 3 роки тому +6

      Oh please. She doesn't decide on much. Disney gets final say

    • @somegamerboii7813
      @somegamerboii7813 3 роки тому +1

      It appeared 4 years ago and Kathleen Kennedy released the sequels

    • @CrimesForDimes
      @CrimesForDimes 3 роки тому

      Ok that was good

    • @TravelerZ24
      @TravelerZ24 3 роки тому +1

      @@GrampsandMates the president of Disney really wants to fire her but she said she would make a show about a lesbian couple so if he tried it would look really bad on his part

  • @Flexe1001
    @Flexe1001 4 роки тому +827

    Palpatine: commander, what you discovered on that system
    Commander: space oil my lord
    USA: *OBSERVE*

    • @FujinForce
      @FujinForce 4 роки тому +10

      Star Wars: *deploys gonk droid*

    • @trisblackshaw1640
      @trisblackshaw1640 4 роки тому +13

      More like USA: Introduce democracy

    • @giantturtlecat2959
      @giantturtlecat2959 4 роки тому +2

      fujin force
      Finally, a worthy opponent
      Their battle shall be legendary

    • @SamnissArandeen
      @SamnissArandeen 4 роки тому +9

      The image of a Texan Palpatine is hilarious.

    • @Ebbsy08
      @Ebbsy08 4 роки тому +2

      Tris Blackshaw *We gonna serve them some freedom*

  • @chimingw
    @chimingw 3 роки тому +1025

    “10 thousand stormtroopers”
    American tank crews: “is for me?”

    • @nuclearphoenix177
      @nuclearphoenix177 3 роки тому +112

      That’s a lot of speed bumps

    • @chen_plays4173
      @chen_plays4173 3 роки тому +16

      @@nuclearphoenix177 you got me good

    • @fionn7631
      @fionn7631 3 роки тому +9

      At At?

    • @nuclearphoenix177
      @nuclearphoenix177 3 роки тому +13

      @@fionn7631 pretty sure a Abrams going full speed could knock one down or just fly a gloabemaster into one

    • @paulypoobrain2929
      @paulypoobrain2929 3 роки тому +54

      Oh, they have land invaded with walkers and stormtroopers?
      A10s: it’s game time boys!

  • @aristeiner9656
    @aristeiner9656 3 роки тому +16

    Imperial fleet: Boi they ain’t ready fr this
    Area 51: hello there

    • @seanhewitt603
      @seanhewitt603 4 місяці тому

      Lol, huffing on printer's ink does not make area 51 the base of alien tech or miracles...

  • @nickjackson5707
    @nickjackson5707 5 років тому +1101

    *tie fighter appears*
    A10 warthog: did someone say brrrrrt?

    • @irenerivera4827
      @irenerivera4827 5 років тому +74

      Jonathan Stiles shut up nerd

    • @ricohernandez9969
      @ricohernandez9969 4 роки тому +8

      @Jonathan Stiles you just got bamboozled

    • @phantomdude9901
      @phantomdude9901 4 роки тому +12

      @Jonathan Stiles well I mean...lets say you used it against a air fighter...Per say, a tie fighter.

    • @thefireswordtfs8011
      @thefireswordtfs8011 4 роки тому +7

      @@irenerivera4827 Its a vehicle killer ya 3rd grade bully

    • @thefireswordtfs8011
      @thefireswordtfs8011 4 роки тому +1

      not copying the comment i knew that before

  • @tanksniper380
    @tanksniper380 5 років тому +2581

    First thought before clicking on vid:
    Nuke
    Edit: Lol these comments.

    • @grandmofftarkin8519
      @grandmofftarkin8519 5 років тому +112

      Me too
      Me too

    • @metawarp7446
      @metawarp7446 5 років тому +152

      Trump: Hey Putin, my man, my brother, drop some bomba on ma boy hovering over LA?

    • @akeiai
      @akeiai 4 роки тому +71

      Putin: Sure
      (This is because if they bombed US, they won't get any repercussions.)

    • @johnrobles9416
      @johnrobles9416 4 роки тому +26

      Nukes won’t work lol

    • @metawarp7446
      @metawarp7446 4 роки тому +13

      @@johnrobles9416 Why?

  • @meemmahn2856
    @meemmahn2856 Рік тому +12

    I'd say the biggest determining factor is the difference between Star Wars metals and real-world metals, and how Star Wars shields hold up against projectile weapons. Bullets and smaller missiles may just plink off things as small as TIE fighters.

    • @SherlockHolmesb-kp4ru
      @SherlockHolmesb-kp4ru 6 місяців тому

      The metal alloys which are used in stars such as durasteel etc...are a gazillion times more better in quality ,durability and strength than steel ,titanium and other artificial metal alloys of ours .Comparing the level of industry and metallurgy of star wars to ours is overkill and is insulting to the quality of metals in star wars .

  • @shaggysnaggy1022
    @shaggysnaggy1022 3 роки тому +11

    Imagine what Boba Fett is capable of if he has a Seismic Charge in the middle of LA. Those things will destroy anything.

  • @uh-1chueygunship87
    @uh-1chueygunship87 3 роки тому +1092

    U.S: “you see that space dorito?”
    private: “yes sur”
    Sergeant: “don’t you smell oil?”
    *STARTS N U K E*

    • @oggabooka2324
      @oggabooka2324 3 роки тому +13

      Warning scp 096 has breached containment the dorito saw the picture

    • @questionable1556
      @questionable1556 3 роки тому +1

      @@oggabooka2324 ?

    • @dinostar_wars9513
      @dinostar_wars9513 3 роки тому +5

      @@questionable1556 you clearly don't know what an scp is.

    • @questionable1556
      @questionable1556 3 роки тому +5

      @@dinostar_wars9513 no lmao the joke wasnt funny also didnt make sense for me

    • @kingcreeper1388
      @kingcreeper1388 3 роки тому +12

      America: kaboom?
      Every other country who is scared of the star destroyer: yes America, kaboom

  • @jamescusack6511
    @jamescusack6511 6 років тому +1647

    Future video idea: The whole army of The Empire vs. the Russian Winter

    • @setha7066
      @setha7066 6 років тому +152

      James Cusack the warm grace of the emperor will keep them warm

    • @TheTexasRanger0101
      @TheTexasRanger0101 6 років тому +160

      Here comrade, take mosin nagant. It is good rifle. You will kill the imperials with it.

    • @jim4671
      @jim4671 6 років тому +121

      That is very one sided.
      Mother Russia protects herself.

    • @dotsinki1096
      @dotsinki1096 6 років тому +68

      how about we step up a little and say the finnish winter with Simo Häyha hiding in the snow

    • @arndegothia1412
      @arndegothia1412 6 років тому +47

      He would fucking headshot all of them

  • @vallore.arcana
    @vallore.arcana 3 роки тому +84

    The Star Destroyer attacking the US would be like Vader punching a patriotic beehive.

    • @ygotsvlog3762
      @ygotsvlog3762 3 роки тому +6

      More like vader shooting a rocket at a beehive

    • @brotherhoodofsteeld.c.chap1917
      @brotherhoodofsteeld.c.chap1917 3 роки тому +11

      @@ygotsvlog3762 not really, anyone who knows anything about Star Wars lore knows if Star Wars ships were bound by logic and physics Star destroyers would be destroyed by the UNSC’s weakest frigates.

    • @ygotsvlog3762
      @ygotsvlog3762 3 роки тому +1

      @@brotherhoodofsteeld.c.chap1917 thats what i meant usa is stronger

    • @brotherhoodofsteeld.c.chap1917
      @brotherhoodofsteeld.c.chap1917 3 роки тому +1

      @@ygotsvlog3762 ah I see

    • @racelkatyusha403
      @racelkatyusha403 3 роки тому +1

      more like force crushing thsn punching or slicking em up eith light saber

  • @TheQwin10
    @TheQwin10 3 роки тому +60

    It's an important part of the discussion to consider the EMP effect of nuclear weapons. On one hand, this could mean that only a couple or even a single nuclear weapon could effectively disable the star destroyer, but on the other hand the effect would likely impact the continental US, especially at such low altitude. That and the added impacts of radiation may make the US military less keen to use nuclear weapons, at least at first.
    Additionally, if the Empire is smart they would target GPS satellites in orbit, which has the potential to severely hinder communications and targeting systems throughout the US military

    • @seanhewitt603
      @seanhewitt603 4 місяці тому

      Uhhh ion cannons could wipe out the us power grid, what they gonna use then? Sticks?

  • @supe4701
    @supe4701 4 роки тому +174

    The us military just needs to reinforce their planes with plot armour

    • @kalebsci
      @kalebsci 3 роки тому +11

      lets call the resistance and ask if we could have some

    • @nachox28x28
      @nachox28x28 3 роки тому +6

      @@kalebsci
      Yes but more importantly that Rey Palpatine person

    • @riowarner0617
      @riowarner0617 3 роки тому +1

      The US has numbers thats how the "win" yet they don't come on top

    • @michaelstodovski2219
      @michaelstodovski2219 3 роки тому +6

      Lol no.
      Modern Fighter Jets would obliterate TIE Fighters from dozens of miles away.
      And even if the Fighter Jets wanted to play around in dogfight... They're faster and could still easily wipe the floor with TIE's considering how supermanuverable modern missiles are.
      As for the Star Destroyer it would be one gigantic hard to miss target. It's shields would be a tough nut to crack though the sheer volume of ordinance and missiles available would bring down the Star Destroyer and it can do absolutely nothing about it other than to power up it's hyperdrive and buzz out as soon as possible.

    • @mullet6180
      @mullet6180 3 роки тому +6

      @@michaelstodovski2219 I hate myself cause I said I wouldn’t comment on this but here goes I guess....
      I won’t acclaim myself to be a Star Wars nerd but it’s knowledgable that TIE fighters, interceptors, and other fighter craft within the Imperial Navy have access to a variety of ordinance BESIDES normal lasers; for example, ion torpedos, which have the effects of an EMP; missiles, which would almost certainly be more advanced then ours and so would be able to handle more G, and so would be harder to evade (and when you say super-manoeuvrable, I hope you don’t assume they do top gun stuff and follow you everywhere); flares; and other advanced weaponry. Furthermore, though the ISD (Imperial (II) Star Destroyer) has no single-purpose anti-aircraft batteries (and by this I mean AA guns), it is fair to assume that the targeting system, which is commonplace on all ISD, could easily guide secondary and trench-placed turbo lasers to engage aircraft while primary batteries continued an orbital bombardment. In the video it was stated that the ISD is highly manoeuvrable, and indeed quick, with a speed which reaches slightly below that of the average fighter. Let’s use the F22 for my example. 2,414 km/h is the top speed of the Lockheed Martin F22 Raptor, with a cruising speed of 1,963 km/h. That’s Mach 2.2 and 1.6 respectively. During the Star Wars movies we can see that, during large-scale naval engagements, TIE fighters or zipping around ISDs and other frigates, capital ships, Corvettes, etc, with ease. Do you think that in battle an ISD would go at 200 km/h? No, it would be evading with its top possible speed. Therefore, it’s plausible to assume the TIE fighter can achieve speeds of up to 7.5 Mach at least. And that’s highly generous. So, in the upper atmosphere, no. The F22 Raptor would be extremely outmatched when it comes to speed at least.

  • @Walkr-en8lk
    @Walkr-en8lk 4 роки тому +1098

    When bullets go through shields because shield dont stop ballistic weapons in star wars.

    • @valerymichailbelchinsky1522
      @valerymichailbelchinsky1522 4 роки тому +138

      Walkr2002 I don’t think that bullets would work because the only way for any solid object to pass the shield is if it moves very slowly, as of what I understood from The Clone Wars. I am not quite sure.

    • @Walkr-en8lk
      @Walkr-en8lk 4 роки тому +150

      Valery Michail Belchinsky blaster bolts are really a really hot ball of heat, the shield dissipates the heat, there are actual “guns” in Star Wars which fite bullets, something like a cycler rifle or another one shot rifle uses a bullet or a charge and are able to go through shields as they are ballistic based.

    • @valerymichailbelchinsky1522
      @valerymichailbelchinsky1522 4 роки тому +28

      Walkr2002 So only droideka shields stop objects? Unless they are going very slow?

    • @gregmorrill4783
      @gregmorrill4783 4 роки тому +53

      @@valerymichailbelchinsky1522 I'm pretty sure they use special types of shields. Not ones generally used on Star Destroyers

    • @kckefk0162
      @kckefk0162 4 роки тому +81

      Keep in mind, a star destroyer is bullet prove. the objects like Tiny rocks or trash in space are a thing

  • @theintrovertadventurer9640
    @theintrovertadventurer9640 3 роки тому +16

    You forgot a spaceship’s most powerful weapon, it’s engines. All it has to do is accelerate a small asteroid to relativistic speeds and put it on a collision course with Earth.

    • @tylink99
      @tylink99 3 роки тому +1

      how

    • @arcadiaofficial637
      @arcadiaofficial637 3 роки тому +1

      How to destroy countries 101

    • @danentakoto2701
      @danentakoto2701 2 роки тому +3

      @@tylink99 tractor beam works fine

    • @zizochemlali4639
      @zizochemlali4639 Рік тому

      Well again there’s a way we could counter it example we could shoot an icbm at it as it enters orbit and the parts of it that enter the atmosphere we deal with anti air missles

  • @clonesolar
    @clonesolar 2 роки тому +4

    *CIA tracks George Lucas down*
    CIA agent: "Whered this come from?"
    George Lucas: "Idk, but I can destroy it."
    CIA agent: "How?"
    George lucas: "By destroying the original comic it was in."
    CIA agent! "Ok, destroy it."

  • @onovaooo
    @onovaooo 3 роки тому +426

    Empire: doesnt know location of army bases
    Planetary scan: am i a joke to u?

    • @kinocorner976
      @kinocorner976 3 роки тому +44

      Hoth is a good example of planetary scans not being effective.
      Not to mention earth is unique it in ability to host multiple climates.

    • @mr.juniii5523
      @mr.juniii5523 3 роки тому +3

      Hahaha your right the empire has planetary scan i almost forgot about that

    • @magaxfreak
      @magaxfreak 3 роки тому +23

      @@kinocorner976 hoth is a good example of storms and cave bases being hidden from planetary scan. Most US bases are out in the open and easily spotted with satellite imagery alone. Bring in a planetary scan and they’re gonna know where to strike first before they even get in atmosphere. BUT one all alone would last 24 hours maximum if that. A enough for a planetary blockade? Earth is gonna be glass by next week

    • @AFailedTuringTest
      @AFailedTuringTest 2 роки тому

      That's not going to work from in atmosphere

    • @killman369547
      @killman369547 Рік тому +1

      @@mr.juniii5523 Planet scans aren't always accurate. I think large mineral deposits can throw off their sensors just like large iron deposits will throw off compass readings.

  • @keinenbockmehr1749
    @keinenbockmehr1749 5 років тому +201

    "My Lord... The Earth destroyed the Scout-Ship. What shall we do?" "Send in two Scouts, prepare four more! Let's see, who gives up first!"

    • @phantomdude9901
      @phantomdude9901 4 роки тому +35

      The US would probably salvage the shit outta those weapons and remake them. But probably with better weaponry than a laser bolt that moves at 79mph

    • @kazat0105
      @kazat0105 4 роки тому +28

      @@phantomdude9901lmao as if we could even begin to understand star wars tech, star wars is a good 5k-100k years in the future we can't even begin to understand how they restrained plasma blasts into electromagnetic fields that stayed around long enough to contain the plasma. No we couldn't just "salvage the ship out of that tech" it's not even the same electronics1

    • @j2dragon109
      @j2dragon109 4 роки тому +14

      Kazat0
      We probably could reverse engineer something, but we wouldn’t have the industry to mass produce any of their tech

    • @kazat0105
      @kazat0105 4 роки тому +15

      @@j2dragon109 that's like saying we could "reverse engineer black holes" star wars tech is TOO ADVANCED for our understanding. This isn't independence day where we can steal an alien ship and kill all the aliens. It's real life, not the same electronics to reverse engineer. Plus let's say we "could" reverse engineer the plasma bolts, how would we even power it? Star wars uses alien metals and alien generators with ALIEN BATTERIES to power their ships. we can't reproduce that. much less learn how to actually use it.

    • @lillyanneserrelio2187
      @lillyanneserrelio2187 4 роки тому +7

      @@kazat0105 and EVEN if we could understand their tech to be able to make more, we lack the alien metals and elements such tech requires to even build it. For example Kyber crystals - they are rare even in the Star Wars universe. Without those, even with the knowledge, we would still be unable to make any new light sabers or super lasers. Without the alien elements used in their reactors, we cant power our own home built reactors thus no power source to allow Earth built ships to generate enough energy to jump into hyperspace aka NO FTL travel for us.

  • @theunnamedgamers1244
    @theunnamedgamers1244 3 роки тому +11

    Star destroyer: appears
    US Military: I see you have chosen death

  • @jadeallenriel6805
    @jadeallenriel6805 3 роки тому +19

    Empire: Let’s Lay Some Rules
    1 Nuke = 1 Death Star Shot

    • @anishkoneti7822
      @anishkoneti7822 3 роки тому +3

      Shoots death star with nuke,
      Empire: suprise pichachu face

    • @galaxy-gamer5479
      @galaxy-gamer5479 Рік тому

      @@anishkoneti7822 That's all we need

    • @seanhewitt603
      @seanhewitt603 4 місяці тому

      Uhhhh, no. You don't get that luxury, if your dumb enough to try using nukes, the whole globe gets glassed...

  • @sf_7352
    @sf_7352 3 роки тому +574

    *star destroyer appears*
    America: “hello would you like radiation poisoning?”

    • @nayeemhaque1064
      @nayeemhaque1064 3 роки тому +39

      Sure, our ships are built for space travel bit of ionising radiation won’t hurt.

    • @pizzadog7575
      @pizzadog7575 3 роки тому +14

      Famous last words before destruction

    • @ls200076
      @ls200076 3 роки тому +20

      @@nayeemhaque1064 Famous last words.

    • @TheRealUNGOC
      @TheRealUNGOC 3 роки тому +3

      so anyway i snuked a nuke into a ship and TRAIN GO BOOM

    • @justinb4712
      @justinb4712 3 роки тому +1

      @@nbrohwer2001 right??

  • @valerymichailbelchinsky1522
    @valerymichailbelchinsky1522 4 роки тому +511

    I don’t think that Earth stands a chance after these new “Palpatine 2.0” star destroyers, which work as little death stars.

    • @dantefiore8442
      @dantefiore8442 4 роки тому +57

      Well thankfully literally all of them got destroyed, so issue solved

    • @eternal5930
      @eternal5930 4 роки тому +137

      @@dantefiore8442 They were destroyed thanks to terrible writing

    • @siastorm4050
      @siastorm4050 4 роки тому +27

      Frostfire I wanted palpatime to kill everybody and show him laughing at the end then goes black to be the biggest troll of all time and the last 8 movies were a waste of time 😂😂😂

    • @blutact9931
      @blutact9931 4 роки тому +17

      @@dantefiore8442 they were probably made in china, each one went down in under a minute

    • @Crazy_killer-qm8ju
      @Crazy_killer-qm8ju 4 роки тому +8

      Well 1 x wing took the death star down

  • @davidcarter3830
    @davidcarter3830 3 роки тому +51

    President: How can we destroy them?
    Disney: We done it before, leave that to us

  • @airsoftstuff1753
    @airsoftstuff1753 3 роки тому +7

    I actually think that F-22s outclass tie fighters just because the AMRAAM misfiled they have and their ability to engage an enemy from so far away. And tie fighters don’t have any actual lift so they will rely on sheer engine power and will not be as maneuverable

    • @jacobhayes1239
      @jacobhayes1239 3 роки тому +2

      Yeah f22s can fire missiles from like a mile away. All tie fighters have are slow moving lasers.

    • @airsoftstuff1753
      @airsoftstuff1753 3 роки тому

      @@jacobhayes1239 bro its even better than that. try 1,600 miles

    • @jacobhayes1239
      @jacobhayes1239 3 роки тому

      @@airsoftstuff1753 ok let me just snipe someone in Minnesota from texas with my fighter jet.

    • @airsoftstuff1753
      @airsoftstuff1753 3 роки тому

      @@jacobhayes1239 yes

    • @shinygoldenpotion1587
      @shinygoldenpotion1587 Місяць тому

      and tie fighters have low visibility in the cockpit and 2 targets on each side

  • @bakersmileyface
    @bakersmileyface 4 роки тому +599

    If the ISD enters the atmosphere, I'm sure the US military could take it down. With losses.
    But it would take one hell of an incompetent officer to get it to enter the atmosphere before wrecking the planet's military targets.

    • @CoolMyron
      @CoolMyron 4 роки тому +4

      And kill them selves as well

    • @TrveBlackMetal1
      @TrveBlackMetal1 4 роки тому +59

      thank you, a isd would just sit in orbit and target every military base as well as the biggest population centersuntil the US would yield

    • @greywolf7879
      @greywolf7879 4 роки тому

      Well maybe they were just scouting the planet out?

    • @bakersmileyface
      @bakersmileyface 4 роки тому +15

      @@greywolf7879 Scanners.
      I'm not sure they even have to enter orbit to scout it out to be honest.

    • @danielhan8995
      @danielhan8995 4 роки тому +5

      *Greg the stormtrooper has entered the chat*

  • @benjaminprince6424
    @benjaminprince6424 4 роки тому +258

    F-35 crashes into bridge following loss of deflector shield and lack of intensified forward firepower

    • @thatdollfin3369
      @thatdollfin3369 4 роки тому +3

      best comment i've seen today :)

    • @NYBD
      @NYBD 4 роки тому

      Benjamin Prince lmao

  • @aminatink8918
    @aminatink8918 3 роки тому +23

    I would actually say that the ISD would have won. Earth's forces have no idea there is a shield. After the first failed attack, it would take some trial and error to figure out how to take it out, and what generates it. Time goes by and 24 hours is not enough to gather the required information on how to take down a Star Destroyer.

    • @rbvfeehfbudenrj
      @rbvfeehfbudenrj 3 роки тому

      America would just go with plan B, nuke it. And it’s not like each missile will carry One Nuke. We have payloads that can carry more then just one. And if we launch them all at the star destroyer it ain’t gonna live.

    • @lordofthesith11
      @lordofthesith11 2 роки тому +2

      A Star Wars shield is to block energy, this one is not to block a physical object.

    • @galaxy-gamer5479
      @galaxy-gamer5479 Рік тому +2

      @@lordofthesith11 so by that logic if I throw a brick hard enough I could hit the commanding officer of the star destroyer.

    • @lordofthesith11
      @lordofthesith11 Рік тому +2

      @@galaxy-gamer5479 hell yes

    • @galaxy-gamer5479
      @galaxy-gamer5479 Рік тому +2

      @@lordofthesith11 I need to call Florida man real quick.

  • @kinocorner976
    @kinocorner976 3 роки тому +44

    Let’s get this out of the way- Let’s give the Empire 3 star destroyers- no wonder weapon (Death Star or Darth Vader) (All opinion, let’s have somewhat a decent discussion on this)
    The match up:
    Letting people know that the speed of a star destroyer is that great.
    Fact is, most people here think “meh advanced ship must be fast”
    The top speed of a Imperial Star destroyer is around 950kph or 606 mph without Hyperdrive Roughly the speed of a Korean War fighter jet.
    This is also canon*
    The speed of a tie fighter is roughly 746 mph (1,200 kph) slower than any modern jet.
    Article from Quora (Opinion, not fact):
    “It would lose. Badly. The TIE/LN is objectively a piece of crap. (Sorry George Lucas.)
    The weapons are foward facing only. Not only that but they are essentially visual range only. The KX9 laser cannons of the T-65 X-Wing have a range of 8km (Optimal) and 80 max (This is from Legends but I see no reason to disbelieve this). If the L-s1 of the TIE has similar performance then it is clearly outmatched compared to modern missiles.
    The AIM-120 AMRAAM of the US has a range of ~190km. It is fire and forget, meaning it will continue to track and go after the target even if not fed external targeting data. The laser cannons go straight.
    The TIE has a shit profile from the side. Those large, iconic solar panels are a huge target.
    Ion engines are not “cold” (Relatively speaking) meaning that heat-seekers like the Sidewinder missile can still lock on and kill the target. Sidewinders also have a max range of 35km meaning that even the “close range” missiles of the US is still greater than the TIE’s optimal range.
    Aerodynamically it is not comparable to real-word aircraft. It’s a ball held by struts to solar panels. Nothing is streamlined or made for maneuverability.
    The speed of aircraft like the F-22 Raptor, for example, is more than twice that of the TIE. Weighing in at 2,410kph compared to 1,200kph of the TIE.
    The TIE also, by the Stalinist Imperial doctrine of “Quantity is a quality”, means that the pilot doesnt’t have an effective ejection mechanism. It’s there but barely used and essentially relegates the pilot to just float in space in their life support suit. There is nothing like a parachute mentioned as far as I have read throughout the years. (This is most likely just glossed over though as an unnecessary detail.) It’s basically just a rocket seat that propels the pilot out of the spacecraft.
    The TIE has no shields. It can’t take advantage of them the way an X-Wing does. The X-Wing uses deflector shields in atmosphere to decrease air resistance and increase speed/maneuverability. Not only that but the lack of shields means that any hit can/will be catastrophic.
    The TIE pilot cannot look behind them. There are no mirrors and the cockpit is not a bubble shape like many modern (And even older) fighter aircraft (Though it is a literal bubble). When it comes to a knife fight they can’t really tell what the enemy is going to do.
    TIE pilots also wear those ridiculous helmets. Our pilots wear helmets that display radar data or show the target/what they are looking at. American pilots can even use their helmets to look at a target to facilitate a lock on. TIE pilots look through two Stormtrooper-type eyeholes. It would be like dogfighting while wearing a shitty gas mask and nothing else.
    The only advantages that the TIE has are numbers, loiter time, and the ability to operate outside of the atmosphere. In the case of the latter this means that they can flee to or attack from an area that no modern fighter can truly reach.”
    Ground troops- the US Army and Marines have quality training and equipment- Stromtroopers do not, its “quantity over quality” for the empire.
    The US could easily cause massive damage to stromtroopers corps.
    However, this is all speculation- we’re comparing fact against fiction. In the end it comes down to what you believe.

    • @mygamesover5021
      @mygamesover5021 2 роки тому +4

      that's a long comment

    • @TheOnlyDragonGod
      @TheOnlyDragonGod 2 роки тому +1

      Impressive for writing that out

    • @tropicalfruit3876
      @tropicalfruit3876 2 роки тому +1

      Stormtroopers are elite infantry of the empire aren't they though?

    • @paulpriglinger4154
      @paulpriglinger4154 2 роки тому

      @@tropicalfruit3876 they were, but needs for increased numbers and costs decreased efficiency.

    • @sergioibarra3461
      @sergioibarra3461 2 роки тому +3

      This is fine but you’re making the empire attack in a dumb way while the US defends in their own territory, three star destroyers can just orbit, scan, send probe droids, bomb, intercept any missile sent at them at any speed because of the time it will take to reach the ships altitude in orbit.. you rarely see star destroyers enter the atmosphere and Tie fighters are designed for space. Stormtroopers vs US army tho, that’s another story because bullets will be devastating to armor made to stop energy based. It only takes a couple of attacks for the empire to understand how our weapons work tho and deploy some resistant vehicles or just completely cut the energy of any facility in our planet and sabotage every communication device. Once they’ve done that it’s chaos and they can invade freely. With just three star destroyers playing smart they can conquer Earth, if they get easily destroyed is not because of human strategy or technology it’s just because they played it really bad

  • @genralreno
    @genralreno 4 роки тому +727

    Imperial radar operator: "Commander! There's an enemy fighter on a collision course with the bridge!"
    Randy Quaid in an F-18: "HELLO BOYS!!! IM BAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!!!!!"

    • @koolkidsklub5032
      @koolkidsklub5032 3 роки тому +37

      if you give the Florida man a slab of bud-light and meth, just slam him on the star destroyer and he'll wreak havoc on the ship.

    • @AdmiralBonetoPick
      @AdmiralBonetoPick 3 роки тому +17

      Intensify the forward batteries, I don't want anything to get through.

    • @corrupted4726
      @corrupted4726 3 роки тому +7

      Independence day lol

    • @chaoticfell
      @chaoticfell 3 роки тому +16

      This is the greatest PLANNNN!

    • @lilani6521
      @lilani6521 3 роки тому +5

      Lol

  • @aaronl9530
    @aaronl9530 6 років тому +1201

    Whatabout the vatican vs the Jedi order?

  • @shakeelnajarali1835
    @shakeelnajarali1835 3 роки тому +26

    Ha! We are stronger than these alien threats!
    Empire: stage 1 complete!
    Us: Wha-

  • @TheTerranscout
    @TheTerranscout 3 роки тому +3

    I just can't get past the fact that star destroyers could just hit every major installation that the US has from space, and they could find out where they are with a quick scan of the planet.

    • @paulm-d2398
      @paulm-d2398 3 роки тому +2

      Exactly. I think the star destroyer wins at all tim because it can just stay in space and shoot from there

    • @galaxy-gamer5479
      @galaxy-gamer5479 Рік тому

      Then they will just piss off N.A.T.O. and the U.S. even more

  • @tss3393
    @tss3393 6 років тому +839

    Does the US come with an alcoholic pilot who screams, "UP YOURS" at the Empire?

    • @littleferrhis
      @littleferrhis 6 років тому +101

      “Hello boys, IM BAAACCCKKKK”

    • @goodbye7233
      @goodbye7233 6 років тому +8

      Probably dozens

    • @Phresh2D3F
      @Phresh2D3F 6 років тому +14

      HELLO SHEEV, I'M BAAAACCKKKK!!!!

    • @shawnj3651
      @shawnj3651 6 років тому +31

      we ONLY use alcoholic pilots

    • @tessierashpoolmg7776
      @tessierashpoolmg7776 6 років тому +1

      tss3393 How many do you think we'll need?

  • @DukeOfChirk
    @DukeOfChirk 5 років тому +833

    Imperial officer to another.
    “Can you be bothered fighting these primitives? They still use fossil fuels and ‘stealth’ fighters..... newsflash, we haven’t used radar for millennia! Oh, just push that asteroid we passed into the planets gravitational field and then we can go home”

    • @archangel6676
      @archangel6676 5 років тому +4

      wouldnt work

    • @archangel6676
      @archangel6676 5 років тому +30

      @me and my brother again it wouldnt work

    • @jaidengabriel1675
      @jaidengabriel1675 5 років тому +45

      @@archangel6676 all ICBMs have anti space capability while it may not have too much range we can still nuke the moon

    • @jaidengabriel1675
      @jaidengabriel1675 5 років тому +7

      @@archangel6676 we also could delete the star destroyer and do serious damage to the asteroid but the asteroid might just might live

    • @LunicussOfficial
      @LunicussOfficial 4 роки тому +6

      @Julian Monette You don't even need an asteroid. It would be impossible to stop tungsten rods for example.

  • @nijgaming410
    @nijgaming410 3 роки тому +20

    Also do keep in mind that a nuclear explosions detonating in midair act like EMP devices so if the missiles ended up hitting the top of the shields then not only is a nuke doing damage to The Shield it is also knocking out certain systems that are not protected against a EMP but this EMP will also most likely knockout Electronics in the city below at the same time

  • @dabeastfromdaweast9788
    @dabeastfromdaweast9788 3 роки тому +7

    Me: "man I got to stop watching UA-cam and get back to work"
    UA-cam algorithm:

  • @gravytube4099
    @gravytube4099 4 роки тому +283

    Just remembered Star Wars uses manned gunners, they arent gonna be able to keep up with so many missiles, nuclear or not

    • @thedumbnicname
      @thedumbnicname 3 роки тому +2

      i think the middles would be traveling at a show speed and the star destroyer could just leave

    • @iyzuhatgc8635
      @iyzuhatgc8635 3 роки тому +25

      @@thedumbnicname missiles fly at Mach 3 so if the star destroyer doesn't use the hyperdrive there is no way that it's getting away. And ballistic missiles fly even faster than missiles.

    • @thedumbnicname
      @thedumbnicname 3 роки тому

      @@iyzuhatgc8635 I'm talking more ballistic misled fired from land

    • @iyzuhatgc8635
      @iyzuhatgc8635 3 роки тому +15

      @@thedumbnicname The missile continues to ascend toward the highest point in its trajectory, and then begins to descend toward Earth. This is the longest phase of a missile's flight; for ICBMs, it can last around 20 minutes. During midcourse phase, ICBMs can travel around 24,000 kilometers per hour (15,000 miles per hour).

    • @thedumbnicname
      @thedumbnicname 3 роки тому +4

      @@iyzuhatgc8635 how much damage can a star destroyer do in 10 minutes, yet alone 20.
      if i was the captain of the star destroyer, I'll hit the cities from orbit, then jump away, jump back over another city, bomb that for a while, then repeat...

  • @mason_gilmour12gilmour81
    @mason_gilmour12gilmour81 3 роки тому +285

    When he was talking about aircrafts I almost cried he didn't mention the A-10 warthog the sound alone would tear through the destroyer

    • @rankena4926
      @rankena4926 3 роки тому +36

      A10 sucks at air to air though, that's why the USAF tried to get rid of them

    • @bencesulis
      @bencesulis 3 роки тому +40

      Would not penetrate the shields, while it is a slow, easy to hit craft... It is against ground targets, not ships

    • @notsomatureguy1181
      @notsomatureguy1181 3 роки тому +7

      @@bencesulis It would only be used against the amount of storm troopers

    • @mrhammett7508
      @mrhammett7508 3 роки тому +6

      The A10 isn’t as fast as the Star Destroyer. Makes things difficult for the Warthog.

    • @PeterJavi
      @PeterJavi 3 роки тому +4

      @@mrhammett7508 But it can be used to take down the walkers and other ground troops

  • @nathanguan8298
    @nathanguan8298 3 роки тому +23

    Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D heli-carrier vs starwars

    • @johnwolverton48
      @johnwolverton48 3 роки тому

      That would be an amazing battle

    • @joshuasoobra2562
      @joshuasoobra2562 3 роки тому +1

      I imagine one laser Salvo would destroy/ground it. So that's a 2 min video lol

  • @hithere5839
    @hithere5839 3 роки тому +27

    America: you can’t defeat me.
    China: I know I can’t, but he can
    Star destroyer jumps out of hyperspace

    • @CrimesForDimes
      @CrimesForDimes 3 роки тому

      Atmosphere: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Hello there

    • @Mourtzouphlos240
      @Mourtzouphlos240 3 роки тому

      China has defeated the United States military.

    • @galaxy-gamer5479
      @galaxy-gamer5479 Рік тому

      Everyone not at the location watching the news: IF YOU GET FLORIDA,DETROIT,AND OIHO RESIDENTS TO AGREE ON SOMETHING WE ARE GONNA HAVE A PROBLEM.

  • @theadeptuscustodes
    @theadeptuscustodes 3 роки тому +280

    The empire: NOOO YOU CAN'T JUST NUKE A STAR DESTROYER!
    The US: Haha nuke go boom!

    • @ritayanchaudhuri8516
      @ritayanchaudhuri8516 3 роки тому +13

      The empire: ITS OK WE'LL JUST SEND A 100 MORE , ALONG WITH OUR SUPER STAR DESTROYERS AND A DEATH STAR

    • @thatoneguy7451
      @thatoneguy7451 3 роки тому +1

      @@ritayanchaudhuri8516 no no, they'll send the fleet from exegol to the usa, there's 10000 of them

    • @ritayanchaudhuri8516
      @ritayanchaudhuri8516 3 роки тому +2

      @@thatoneguy7451 that belongs to the first order mate not the imps...

    • @thatoneguy7451
      @thatoneguy7451 3 роки тому

      @@ritayanchaudhuri8516 yeah i'm not really into star wars so i don't know all these things lol

    • @10xyourlife65
      @10xyourlife65 3 роки тому +4

      Wouldn't work they have shields

  • @davidminor6510
    @davidminor6510 4 роки тому +168

    We have the U.S.S. Missouri. Let them try to sink that Battleship!!!

    • @SubayAdamm2
      @SubayAdamm2 3 роки тому +11

      Ooh i remember that movie lmao

    • @guvyygvuhh298
      @guvyygvuhh298 3 роки тому +14

      @@SubayAdamm2 yeah, the Battleship movie
      Not like the Missouri has a chance. Max range is 35-45km, 2 rounds a min on each gun and the guns cant elevate past 38° (off the top of my head, not 100% sure)

    • @pizzadog7575
      @pizzadog7575 3 роки тому +1

      @@guvyygvuhh298 yeah also the sheilds, maybe use those nuclear shells

    • @4SeasonProducer
      @4SeasonProducer 3 роки тому

      Just use aircraft carrier

    • @pizzadog7575
      @pizzadog7575 3 роки тому +3

      @@4SeasonProducer the aircraft is not made for space

  • @somedude4805
    @somedude4805 3 роки тому +3

    Star Destroyer. Star. Destroyer.
    STAR.
    DESTROYER.
    Gee, I wonder if my Abrams tank will win.

    • @akeepers02
      @akeepers02 3 роки тому +2

      Right?! Like they have literal lasers that can vaporize our tanks the metal they use is way stronger than anykind of ballistic weapons we can throw at it. And their shields can withstand a nuke easily.

  • @Mc__Nugget
    @Mc__Nugget 3 роки тому +5

    Star destroyer: *appears above the U.S*
    U.S: It doesn’t look capitalist enough. S h o o t a t i t.

  • @january3rd293
    @january3rd293 6 років тому +125

    I think a big thing the comments are forgetting is in both cases, it depends heavily on who's commanding the U.S. Military, and who's commanding the star destroyer.
    For instance, if Admiral Ozzel, the Vader-choked commander who bungled up the surprise attack at the beginning of Episode V was in charge? I think that greatly increases the chance of the U.S winning. If, on the other hand it's someone like *Grand Admiral Thrawn* on that destroyer? Then there's a horrifically greater danger to the U.S. Military and the world as a whole.

    • @ElectronicsForFun
      @ElectronicsForFun 6 років тому +7

      why would a grand admiral like thrawn have such a low position of command?

    • @theblitzkrieggamer3196
      @theblitzkrieggamer3196 6 років тому +2

      January3rd in the video the commanders are all equal.

    • @arkwelded
      @arkwelded 6 років тому +3

      Thrawn FTW!!!
      watch and learn...

    • @AntiNubDevice
      @AntiNubDevice 6 років тому +3

      The person commanding the ISD would still die in fire when the nukes hit. Mobile nuclear assets, specifically subs, would decimate the Impstar Deuce from a range far superior to what the ISD has.

    • @AsymmetricalCrimes
      @AsymmetricalCrimes Рік тому

      Thrawn would no nothing of Earth weaponing. He'd have no idea what to expect.

  • @prestongarvey4396
    @prestongarvey4396 3 роки тому +110

    I just realized that anti air missiles would probably be effective against TIE Fighters. Because no one in the Star Wars universe uses anti air missiles, then no starfighters would have flares or chaff.

    • @yourlocaltoad5102
      @yourlocaltoad5102 3 роки тому +17

      Anti air missles are a thing, as you can see in episode 2 when Jango Fett uses them against Obi Wan.

    • @prestongarvey4396
      @prestongarvey4396 3 роки тому +25

      @@yourlocaltoad5102 yeah but why don't more people use them?

    • @troycatugal4136
      @troycatugal4136 Рік тому +13

      In the game Star Wars squadrons, all the ships have anti missile capabilities

    • @DanY-mj4gl
      @DanY-mj4gl Рік тому +9

      @@prestongarvey4396 the arquitens class light cruiser has missile tubes, the victory class light destroyer has a crap ton of missile tubes, TIE/DF has missile, proton, and ion missiles/torpedoes, TIE/SA has 8 self guided torpedoes, the Y wings have self guided torpedoes, the X-wing have 2 proton missiles (can be swapped for other weaponary), Jammers are a thing in place for flares

    • @chungus816
      @chungus816 Рік тому

      ​@@prestongarvey4396probably because they tend to be ineffective in many situations

  • @wyatteichholz3139
    @wyatteichholz3139 3 роки тому +14

    Who’s hear after the Galactic confederation got leaked?

  • @JohnDoe-gb6co
    @JohnDoe-gb6co 3 роки тому +9

    U.S.S: did someone say OIL *boss music*

  • @nistorlaurentiu7533
    @nistorlaurentiu7533 4 роки тому +363

    russia:joins the fight
    russia:uses tsar bomba
    star destroyer: straight to gulag

    • @seize3558
      @seize3558 4 роки тому +5

      comedy

    • @Elslemmo
      @Elslemmo 4 роки тому +2

      HAHAHAHAH :D !!!!!!!Thanks Russia!! ;) Vodka is on me :P

    • @mopar_dude9227
      @mopar_dude9227 4 роки тому +4

      Laurentiu Nistor Russia doesn’t have the tech to hit the broad side of a barn. Remember back during the first Gulf War, all those videos of the US smart munitions? Little crosshairs on the target, a few seconds latter no more target. Now jump forward (25 years) to Russia in Syria, they show their videos, crosshairs on a target, few seconds latter...large explosion seen on the very edge of the video, 😂. There was even one that they had to swing the camera with the crosshairs around to see where the damn bomb hit. I guess that is why Russia had to make such a big bomb, when your off by a mile, just blow up everything in the mile radius. After a couple days, they stopped showing those videos, wonder why. BTW, the tech of the US has only gotten better since the 90s.

    • @nistorlaurentiu7533
      @nistorlaurentiu7533 4 роки тому

      @@mopar_dude9227 ik, I was referring only to the destructive capabilities of the bomb

    • @imonymous
      @imonymous 4 роки тому

      @@mopar_dude9227 That's hilarous. Can i see that video?

  • @jonasgaardsted9107
    @jonasgaardsted9107 3 роки тому +7

    Doesnt the Star destroyer have super op shields?

    • @ygotsvlog3762
      @ygotsvlog3762 3 роки тому

      True

    • @GamingT0G0
      @GamingT0G0 3 роки тому +1

      Don't think they hold up against a nuke.

    • @Frostyman452
      @Frostyman452 3 роки тому +1

      Considering they barely hold up against rockets who aren’t even in the kt range I’m pretty it’s fucked when facing a rocket with a 200kt yield.

  • @horizon1081
    @horizon1081 3 роки тому +11

    The star destroyer wouldn’t enter the atmosphere at all

    • @annoyinglyfast5972
      @annoyinglyfast5972 3 роки тому +5

      That's not gonna stop an ICBM from hitting it.

    • @eternalsmiley9181
      @eternalsmiley9181 2 роки тому

      @@annoyinglyfast5972 nut doesn't mean it will be enough.

  • @Ril3y400
    @Ril3y400 3 роки тому +74

    *Star Destroyer appears*
    America; *Picks up red phone.* "This is the way"

    • @theguide1192
      @theguide1192 3 роки тому +1

      This is the way

    • @174b9
      @174b9 2 роки тому

      Это способ

  • @seamy8959
    @seamy8959 6 років тому +825

    Atleast the military can aim

  • @Clove_Parma
    @Clove_Parma 3 роки тому +3

    I like that almost the whole time you're talking about the USAF, the plane (i.e @ 9:51) is An Australian RAAF jet

  • @jaredwise2967
    @jaredwise2967 3 роки тому +6

    I love it but all the destroyer would have to do is get out of the atmosphere and then proceed to blast the shit out of the planet again. In reality we would lose. Plus he doesn't even mention the deflector shields on the thing and what it takes to disable them long enough to deal damage. And what the destroyer is made of. And the fact nukes are a double edged sword.

    • @williamroth7527
      @williamroth7527 2 роки тому +1

      That's the reason why he made it be in-atmosphere, as literaly anything thats above 500km is completely invulnerable to any of the earths weapons, and could literaly just sit up there and drop big rocks on us.

  • @SuperMaanas
    @SuperMaanas 5 років тому +107

    Build a wall around it. Simple enough.

    • @jacobstarr9010
      @jacobstarr9010 4 роки тому +10

      Donald Trump wants to know your location

    • @rion7088
      @rion7088 4 роки тому +1

      Super MayoMoanas SPACE WALL

  • @theoncomingdork
    @theoncomingdork 6 років тому +444

    I'd say TIE fighters are actually inferior to F-22s in practical combat; TIEs have terrible design for in-atmosphere dogfighting (very un-aerodynamic) and must be in visual range to engage an opponent, while F-22s are designed to be very fast in-atmosphere and carry missiles that can be launched at targets far out of visual range.

    • @rolfneve
      @rolfneve 6 років тому +23

      Yu-Kai Ni but tie fighters would most likely not be able to be targeted because of our inferior targeting systems. Also, torpedos

    • @theoncomingdork
      @theoncomingdork 6 років тому +77

      Rolf Neve while our targeting systems may be inferior, they would certainly be good enough to target a TIE fighter; the large solar arrays on the sides would easily allow a radar lock. Also, the standard TIE fighter does not carry torpedoes, only dual laser cannons. Additionally, torpedoes are not designed to work in atmosphere and as such have a much shorter range than the air to air missiles carried by most USAF fighters.

    • @liberatetutemeexinferis5902
      @liberatetutemeexinferis5902 6 років тому +9

      You can spot a missile miles away. Lasers travel at the speed of light.

    • @infoman7630
      @infoman7630 6 років тому +79

      Star Wars lasers are not LASERS (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation). It is just a word used to describe what we know to be a Plasma Bolt, similar to how their 'slug throwers' are not called guns or 'slugs' are not called bullets.
      All of the laser weapons displayed in Star Wars travel slower then the speed of sound - with the 'blaster' only going as fast as a Fastball pitch (~90 mph). The Standard Air to Air missile travels at x2.5 times the speed of sound.

    • @Xphaylore69
      @Xphaylore69 6 років тому +1

      But lasers and the force....

  • @tox1cboi_524
    @tox1cboi_524 2 роки тому +1

    Ah a competent airforce. Unlike the rebellion, these planes cannot land here unless we’re closer to the ground.

  • @misfitskateboarding1702
    @misfitskateboarding1702 3 роки тому

    I don't even like Star Wars and I loved this video. Good job dude! 👍👍

  • @atem9170
    @atem9170 6 років тому +59

    The High Ground versus a Star Destroyer

    • @jared_teddy6011
      @jared_teddy6011 5 років тому +1

      Shaggy at 1 percent power vs a star destroyer
      oh yeah yeah

  • @matthewbarlow982
    @matthewbarlow982 4 роки тому +247

    The star destroyer would just stay in space it has no reason to come into the atmosphere

    • @SilentArc
      @SilentArc 4 роки тому +7

      No because they have bloodlust. No negotiations and no retreating.

    • @matthewbarlow982
      @matthewbarlow982 4 роки тому +56

      @@SilentArc What I'm trying to say is the star destroyer can do the same damage to the US in space

    • @SilentArc
      @SilentArc 4 роки тому +4

      Matthew Barlow I think in the beginning of the video, EL didn’t want to use the Super Star Destroyer because that ship had orbital bombardment. I don’t think this one has orbital abilities

    • @matthewbarlow982
      @matthewbarlow982 4 роки тому

      @@SilentArc So it can't shoot from space

    • @SilentArc
      @SilentArc 4 роки тому +6

      Matthew Barlow it’s not meant to shoot from space. That’s what EL is trying to say.

  • @E115xGaMiiNGxHD
    @E115xGaMiiNGxHD 3 роки тому +12

    How many nuclear weapons do you think it could take? Personally I think after 1 hit with a nuclear weapon, its bye bye Star Destroyer

    • @lordofthesith11
      @lordofthesith11 2 роки тому

      A nuke would be a last resort, but yeah honestly it would obliterate the destroyer

    • @danny_boi3537
      @danny_boi3537 2 роки тому +1

      I think the only chance it would have is if it could use its laser cannons to destroy the incoming warhead, and even then, they probably couldn't shoot it down any better than the US could intercept an ICBM from somewhere else on earth.

    • @nichsulol4844
      @nichsulol4844 Рік тому

      @@danny_boi3537 spaceship is bouncy ball weak

    • @alexlubbers1589
      @alexlubbers1589 Рік тому

      Depends on the yield of them. Small tactical nukes in the 1-10 kiloton range would probably just bounce off the ISD's shield and shake the ship a bit.
      But a larger bomb like 10 Megatons would probably do the job in one hit.

    • @galaxy-gamer5479
      @galaxy-gamer5479 Рік тому

      @@alexlubbers1589 tsar bomba

  • @weaselwolf8425
    @weaselwolf8425 3 роки тому

    Random star destroyer appears in the sky
    America: Now it's time to dust off the old alien tech

  • @randomperson-pq6lt
    @randomperson-pq6lt 4 роки тому +64

    Star Destroyer: *falls down to earth*
    People in the city it was hovering above:
    oh no

    • @micahwren2902
      @micahwren2902 4 роки тому +1

      @random person More like the whole planet lol

    • @matthew8629
      @matthew8629 4 роки тому +2

      Is it bad I read that in Palpatine's voice? 😂

    • @nichsa8984
      @nichsa8984 4 роки тому

      @@micahwren2902 this known bad luck space marine of terran

    • @BigBilly2001
      @BigBilly2001 3 роки тому

      random person Everyone in about a 100 kilometer radius, if not more, is dead when that destroyer falls.

  • @matthew8629
    @matthew8629 3 роки тому +217

    Railguns: *exist*
    Star Destroyer: Why do I hear boss music?

    • @danielclick4314
      @danielclick4314 3 роки тому +8

      terraria ptsd

    • @wyattwalden1733
      @wyattwalden1733 3 роки тому +6

      As soon as I saw this video I was like "uhm railguns=game over

    • @gabrielclark1425
      @gabrielclark1425 3 роки тому +26

      Yeah, they like to talk about the ship board railguns but _no one_ ever seems to even mention the possibility of static railguns placed along the coast hooked up to their own power plants... Tis classified me thinks.

    • @DrewLloyd727
      @DrewLloyd727 3 роки тому +4

      I liked this then I liked it to keep the likes at 69 👍🏻👍🏻

    • @bobbuilder1009
      @bobbuilder1009 3 роки тому +2

      @@gabrielclark1425 probably not a great idea unless they can be moved really easily, since they are super expensive and coverage of a small coast would cost a fortune.

  • @AmatrixDigitalArtStudios
    @AmatrixDigitalArtStudios 3 роки тому +7

    US: ET's are invading
    Private Carl: What's with the flying Dorito
    Sarg: Dont know, but we are gonna nuke the hell outta it
    Imperial commander: Kill them all
    *24 hrs later*
    US: Imma head out

    • @eternalsmiley9181
      @eternalsmiley9181 2 роки тому

      yeaaah nuking is a bad idea, the real losers are the US if they nuke above US soil. even if they defeat the ISD they still lose :/ Not worth defeating an enemy to defeat yourself.

  • @TheGamingNorwegian
    @TheGamingNorwegian 3 роки тому +21

    When we become a multi planetary species, we should become the empire, dress as them, have the same ships etc. So in case the empire actually exists we blend right in.

    • @dawgah
      @dawgah 3 роки тому +1

      That’s effectively joining the empire tho

    • @eternalsmiley9181
      @eternalsmiley9181 2 роки тому +1

      @@dawgah nah we wouldn't have it down enough they would be sus preeettty quickly as we wouldn't have the knowledge to be 'up to date' with whatever version of the empire finds us. we would look like either a remenant from a lost mission or rebel spies.

    • @galaxy-gamer5479
      @galaxy-gamer5479 Рік тому

      @@eternalsmiley9181 they're dumber than a box of rocks it would take years for them to even think of the possibility of that being a thing.

  • @caelemmcisaac3147
    @caelemmcisaac3147 6 років тому +291

    Empire: come at us
    USA: *nukes the star destroyer*

    • @emperorpalpatine6365
      @emperorpalpatine6365 6 років тому +15

      caelem mcisaac
      Not if they go above atmosphere.

    • @gorkaaustin5306
      @gorkaaustin5306 6 років тому +5

      caelem mcisaac
      Not if they orbitle strike in space out of range

    • @helloeveryone5251
      @helloeveryone5251 6 років тому +17

      caelem mcisaac star destroyer: uses shield.

    • @timmcfadden8438
      @timmcfadden8438 6 років тому +23

      Nukes are absorbed by ImpStar deuce's deflectors. Captain and bridge crew laugh uproariously at America's temerity, then fires a turbolaser barrage at DC.

    • @morromenos1016
      @morromenos1016 6 років тому +10

      If it was a handful of nukes, I would agree. But a enough nukes to kill the Earth? Star Destroyer shields and turbolasers couldn't defend against it. Range is the biggest issue, but ICBMs could still probably solve that issue.

  • @puderrick8634
    @puderrick8634 4 роки тому +194

    Star Wars XV: Independence Day

    • @gamingunner128
      @gamingunner128 3 роки тому

      Pu Derrick lol, kill the queen

    • @lightmaster001
      @lightmaster001 3 роки тому +2

      USA: Send a virus for make their shields down.

  • @number3766
    @number3766 2 роки тому +1

    We just lose.
    Literally, just stay in orbit and bombard Earth. It's the "hand on top of your little sibling" model of fighting.

  • @generaln.gabriel1240
    @generaln.gabriel1240 2 роки тому +1

    The empire: * invades America *
    Every American gun owner * Laughs in 2nd amendment *

  • @jakepotter6574
    @jakepotter6574 4 роки тому +105

    I like how we glance over the fact that the destroyer could probably just destroy the planet if it wanted to

    • @emperordux6962
      @emperordux6962 4 роки тому +11

      Especially after we saw those Star Destroyers in The rise of Skywalker

    • @jeffreymoananu1543
      @jeffreymoananu1543 4 роки тому +5

      @@emperordux6962 those ones got extreme b u f f s

    • @Althubx
      @Althubx 4 роки тому +3

      he didnt gloss over that. he addressed that factor for minutes

    • @biohazardlnfS
      @biohazardlnfS 4 роки тому +3

      He also stated we were not talking about those as well. The ones with planet death canons. Also even If they diiiiid use it if they used that in atmosphere they would also kill themselves

    • @JacketCK
      @JacketCK 4 роки тому +12

      Class 2 star destroyer does not carry planet killing weapons tf are you talking about?