Minx Of Madness World Record

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лип 2024
  • This is the minx of madness, it has 5993 moving parts and weighs over 10KG. It was printed on desktop FDM 3d printers over the course of 2 months.
    You can find the Anycubic Kobra at
    Official store: bit.ly/37ZvN1j
    Amazon store: amzn.to/3sdwHhA
    A big thank you to Polymaker for providing all the filament used in this project.
    You can find their filament here: us.polymaker.com?aff=41
    Solving 250 Rubik's Cubes BLINDFOLDED (WORLD RECORD): • Solving 250 Rubik's Cu...
    If you are interested in buying this puzzle, or have any other business inquiries please email me at: corenpuzzle@gmail.com
    0:00 Intro
    1:25 Turning
    2:07 Number of permutations
    4:23 Tools and materials used
    5:37 Scrambling
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 5 тис.

  • @JD-oc5wk
    @JD-oc5wk 2 роки тому +7904

    I feel like this is the one cube where taking it apart and reassembling it would be faster than solving it.

  • @JJAG3
    @JJAG3 2 роки тому +9316

    Honestly, every turn is probably the only time that permeutatiom will ever exist

    • @YoureASquidYoureAKid
      @YoureASquidYoureAKid 2 роки тому +704

      Its the same for a 3x3x3 cube. Since it has 43,252,003,274,489,856,000 permutations

    • @choco_jack7016
      @choco_jack7016 2 роки тому +690

      well except for when it's close to being solved as the almost solved permutations would appear more often.

    • @Louis_2568
      @Louis_2568 2 роки тому +297

      @@YoureASquidYoureAKid but even so with how many and how many times people have cubes I’m sure some permutations have been repeated

    • @hdjabs1950
      @hdjabs1950 2 роки тому +143

      The same is true every time you properly shuffle cards

    • @zisischartampilas6601
      @zisischartampilas6601 2 роки тому +33

      The real question is is it easier to make it ot ssolve it?

  • @AusUnHus
    @AusUnHus Рік тому +695

    Even 1 year later he’s still solving it. That is what I call commitment!

    • @towerofresonance4877
      @towerofresonance4877 Рік тому +14

      We ain't gettin pinned. He moved on.

    • @jandedycker1748
      @jandedycker1748 5 місяців тому +1

      At this point I bet he's just re-applying stickers.

    • @Xpnvh
      @Xpnvh День тому

      hes got about 2/5 of the white center done at this point

  • @dogsareawesome9197
    @dogsareawesome9197 Рік тому +260

    The mix of tiny square pieces, stretched out long pieces, and big middle pieces almost make the puzzle look glitched out when scrambled. Thats my favorite thing about it, honestly

    • @theseangle
      @theseangle Рік тому +2

      It looks like Reddit

    • @user-xf2my3hq8x
      @user-xf2my3hq8x 6 місяців тому

      Actually the diffferent sized pieces eliminates a lot of possibliities compared to all of them being the same size that would have allowed puzzle to scrammbled into. - Richard.

    • @atiny_my901
      @atiny_my901 2 місяці тому

      @@user-xf2my3hq8xok Richard

  • @Tingman
    @Tingman 2 роки тому +3476

    The scrambled puzzle looks like the Tesseract from Interstellar! So beautiful and mindbending.

    • @x2y7
      @x2y7 2 роки тому +5

      First to reply yay

    • @x2y7
      @x2y7 2 роки тому +9

      I’m trying to get Tingman’s attention

    • @01xc92
      @01xc92 2 роки тому +1

      @@x2y7 😁

    • @SGNHuyLa
      @SGNHuyLa 2 роки тому +1

      what's the difference?

    • @x2y7
      @x2y7 2 роки тому

      @@teaperm3549 oooo

  • @MaverickJeyKidding
    @MaverickJeyKidding 2 роки тому +3538

    we finally getting closer to "the longer you scramble it - the harder it is to solve"

    • @Themanofstupid
      @Themanofstupid Рік тому +88

      i think we've passed that milestone just from this.

    • @MetricJester
      @MetricJester Рік тому +93

      Well considering that once you get past 25 moves on a regular rubik's cube you start solving it, in this case the halfway point is some near astronomical number.

    • @me_fault
      @me_fault Рік тому +29

      ​@@MetricJester that assumes every random move made took you further away from solved

    • @samuels1123
      @samuels1123 Рік тому +26

      @@me_fault you cannot make something beyond 'perfectly randomized' there is a limit to the amount of information stored on the cube while still being usable, the big one has a much higher capacity but still has this limit

    • @me_fault
      @me_fault Рік тому +11

      let me put it another way
      if you make a random move in an attempt to make the cube a further number of moves away from solved, how do you know you haven't inadvertently reduced the number of moves away from solved

  • @paulmorphy6187
    @paulmorphy6187 Рік тому +33

    When I was about 10 the Rubik's cube came out in the UK in around 1980....it was a sensation...everyone had one...I taught myself to solve it and really enjoyed spending hours with it.
    Fast forward to 2022 and I would probably still be trying to solve this one if it came out in 1980!!

  • @gartersnake3288
    @gartersnake3288 Рік тому +117

    Legend has it he's still trying to solve it to this day

  • @max2x000
    @max2x000 Рік тому +3020

    I love the idea that a super computer would try to render this and immediately explode

    • @taoarg9000
      @taoarg9000 Рік тому +54

      The reality is a computer. We live in the matrix

    • @kamikeserpentail3778
      @kamikeserpentail3778 Рік тому +209

      It wouldn't though.
      If it tried to render every possible permutation though it would definitely freeze up before it got even a fraction of the way.

    • @hydroxide5507
      @hydroxide5507 Рік тому +11

      @@kamikeserpentail3778 🤓

    • @thesoftone
      @thesoftone Рік тому +28

      @@hydroxide5507 "🤓"🤓

    • @hydroxide5507
      @hydroxide5507 Рік тому +7

      @@thesoftone ""🤓"🤓 "🤓

  • @Howlflame
    @Howlflame Рік тому +1654

    As someone who has never solved a regular Rubix Cube, this just makes me cry in fear XD

    • @shadowsfall42
      @shadowsfall42 Рік тому +80

      I've been working on my fun little 2x2 for like 6 years now only ever been able to solve 3 colors. Don't feel bad though I can't tell you how many times I've been shamed by people for being " too stupid to solve the easiest Rubix cube on the planet"

    • @ratisbonawau
      @ratisbonawau Рік тому +22

      @@shadowsfall42 💀💀💀

    • @lmccord2995
      @lmccord2995 Рік тому +86

      I get you there, I’ve been trying to solve this 1x1 Rubix cube for a decade, damn near impossible…

    • @where_the_hell_am_i
      @where_the_hell_am_i Рік тому +45

      @@lmccord2995 i feel you too bud, but i just dont get why i cant solve the 0x0, like its so unsolvable and ive been trying to solve it everyday, and still to this day and i've been at it FOR YEARS

    • @madmouse1016
      @madmouse1016 Рік тому +1

      *same*

  • @tygamer1326
    @tygamer1326 7 місяців тому +13

    It’s been a year since this was posted…
    I think he’s still solving this puzzle today!

    • @Jasseu
      @Jasseu 7 місяців тому +2

      I came to say the same thing.

  • @allenkatz5652
    @allenkatz5652 Рік тому +58

    At 2:36, here's what the mess in the denominator means.
    Firstly, it's important to define the difference between a permutation and a combination. With permutation the order (or placement) is important while with combinations it's not. So, for example, if a teacher from a class of 20 is picking two class representatives and chooses Albert and Brian, it's the same thing as choosing Brian and Albert so the different number of combinations is (20/2) * 19 = 190 (with the 2 in the denominator since the first representative chosen can be in two different spots). Now, if the teacher is choosing a president and vice president- choosing Albert for president and Brian for vice president is different than choosing Brian for president and Albert for vice president so the number of permutations is 20*19 = 380.
    To explain the denominator in the equation in the video, let's start with a Gigaminx. The face on a Gigaminx has a center pentagon, a middle ring and an outer ring (i.e., the edge). We're going to focus on the middle ring of one face and ignore the center pentagon and outer ring. The middle ring has five diamond shaped pieces and five trapezoid shaped pieces. Since placement of each diamond shaped piece doesn't make a difference, a solver can place the first diamond in five places, the second one in four places, the third one in three places, the fourth one in two places and the last one is forced into the remaining spot. So, there are 5*4*3*2*1 = 5! = 120 ways for the diamonds on the first face to be placed (all of which are correct in a solved Gigaminx). Similarly, there are 5! = 120 ways (again, all of which are correct) for the trapezoid pieces to be placed when solving the first face. So, with twelve faces there are twelve sets of diamonds and twelve sets of trapezoids for a total of 24 sets. With n = 2 for a Gigaminx we have 12*n*(n-1) = 12*2*(2-1) = 24 which is the 24 sets. And that's where the exponent of 24 comes from for the 5! in the denominator.
    Using other values of n: for n = 1 (a typical Megaminx) the exponent is 0 which makes the denominator 1 as expected since there's no user discretion where to place any piece (i.e., every single piece will be in the exact same spot when it's solved). For n = 2 (a Gigaminx) I showed above that the exponent is 24. For n = 3 (a Teraminx) the exponent is 72 as there are 6 different sets of pieces, on each of the 12 faces, that can be in five different locations each (0 in the innermost layer - the middle pentagon, 2 in the next layer, 4 in the next layer and 0 in the next layer - the edge). For n = 4 (a Petaminx) the exponent is 144 as there is one more ring than a Teraminx and each subsequent ring has 2 more pieces that can be in any of 5 places and (2+4+6) *12 = 144.
    Finally, for n = 10 (does it even have a name?) the exponent in the denominator is 1,080 (12*10*(10-1) = 1,080.
    Note that if each piece was numbered and had to go in a specific spot the exponent in the denominator would be 0.

  • @zozo3071
    @zozo3071 2 роки тому +782

    Wow using the demon core to create an extreme puzzle is wild

  • @Wunba
    @Wunba 2 роки тому +1224

    Insane video, well produced, it was entertaining all the way through and I cannot believe you’re actually solving it! My guess is 70 hours 😬

  • @Chris_691
    @Chris_691 Рік тому +4

    The amount of precision this need is unbelievable

  • @midnightcat6116
    @midnightcat6116 Рік тому +1

    This looks like a beautiful piece of art 🖼️

  • @williamsanborn9195
    @williamsanborn9195 2 роки тому +1361

    “How many possible ways are there to scramble this puzzle”
    Me: “TOO many.”
    “8.6x10^7924 possible ways.”
    Me: “Like I said. TOO MANY!”

    • @robbieaulia6462
      @robbieaulia6462 2 роки тому +13

      NOT ENOUGH

    • @magicalunicorn1296
      @magicalunicorn1296 2 роки тому +17

      Theres more than 86 duomilli-sescentillion (the 2600th -illion), ways to scramble it

    • @zzztriplezzz5264
      @zzztriplezzz5264 2 роки тому +5

      @@magicalunicorn1296hello. I am aware of the fact that when naming powers of 1000 there are prefixes used in the words such as quadragin and nonagin and millia (I am quite fascinated with it, and I’ve been on the first 10000 powers of 10 website). However, I have yet to find a website that includes names for much larger numbers, like up to powers of a million. Do you have any? Or is there a rule you have to follow when naming them?

    • @magicalunicorn1296
      @magicalunicorn1296 2 роки тому +3

      @@zzztriplezzz5264
      ua-cam.com/video/tP-pvo7N5ks/v-deo.html
      vidoe

    • @DumDouglas
      @DumDouglas Рік тому

      Infinity.....

  • @scrambledmc3772
    @scrambledmc3772 2 роки тому +652

    Just one thing: you never mentioned how many layer this has.
    Edit: just counted, this is a 21x21 minx. That’s impressive great job!

    • @ImScor327
      @ImScor327 2 роки тому +30

      This, if it was named after the prefixes of -byte words... Would be a god damn chonky hecka' bigass mindbreaking groundsmashing ENDECAMINX. Holy mother of Joseph...

    • @scratchthecatqwerty9420
      @scratchthecatqwerty9420 2 роки тому +21

      @@ImScor327 It's named with Metric prefixes, but if it was, then there will be not enough prefixes! In fact, you will need to invent 3 new prefixes to name it!

    • @ImScor327
      @ImScor327 2 роки тому +10

      @@scratchthecatqwerty9420 actually, just found out that you only need to invent one! Bronto- and geop- are units as well! Wtf
      P.D.: They are not SI units, but they're the most acceptable ones along with "hellabyte" as a substitute for "brontobyte"

    • @pawfectdogs4629
      @pawfectdogs4629 2 роки тому +3

      @@ImScor327 undecaminx*

    • @ImScor327
      @ImScor327 2 роки тому +6

      @@pawfectdogs4629 guess spanish and english prefixes are different depending on which... It's endeca for me but anyways, still meaning 11 here

  • @nicolasfranks3603
    @nicolasfranks3603 3 місяці тому

    So ready for that solved video! The dedication is wild!

  • @onebrickatatime9097
    @onebrickatatime9097 11 місяців тому +4

    Legends say he's still solving it to this day.

  • @calebblack1420
    @calebblack1420 Рік тому +217

    He was so busy wondering wether or not he could he never stopped to ask himself if he should. He’s warping the fabric of reality around him.

  • @PowerOfNull
    @PowerOfNull 2 роки тому +782

    After doing some research, This would technically be called the Vundaminx.
    Mega - 3
    Giga - 5
    Tera - 7
    Peta - 9
    Exa - 11
    Zetta - 13
    Yotta - 15
    Xona - 17
    Weka - 19
    Vunda - 21
    Now if only we could see a Lumaminx...

    • @SuB-mt6nv
      @SuB-mt6nv 2 роки тому +8

      where did you get these names from?

    • @ericwu6571
      @ericwu6571 2 роки тому +77

      @@SuB-mt6nv prefixes for data units its one of the first few results on google

    • @SuB-mt6nv
      @SuB-mt6nv 2 роки тому +4

      @@ericwu6571 thanks

    • @The_upgrater
      @The_upgrater 2 роки тому +14

      @American Mapper
      luma - 23
      lotta -25

    • @The_upgrater
      @The_upgrater 2 роки тому +3

      But what about the varieties of kilominx?

  • @Luxinator_ReX
    @Luxinator_ReX 11 місяців тому +8

    This guy is honestly underrated

  • @shelleyreynolds5810
    @shelleyreynolds5810 7 місяців тому

    WOW, seriously!!!!! Amazing!!!!!

  • @RPGfanatic1996
    @RPGfanatic1996 2 роки тому +221

    As someone with no talent for these sorts of puzzles, I'm going to go out on a limb and say 3 years... due in part, to the sheer amount of possibilities and irl getting in the way of solving time.

    • @SuperChargeTheDumDum
      @SuperChargeTheDumDum Рік тому +6

      As someone who has only solved a 3X3 2 times I’d say at least 2 years

    • @Felipera_
      @Felipera_ Рік тому +17

      It's not even about knowing how to solve it. It's about the sheer size of this thing lmao. I take 2 weeks to solve my 8x8x8, this will take like 6 months for someone of his skill.

    • @ericvosselmans5657
      @ericvosselmans5657 Рік тому +1

      I would say januari 2023

    • @shadowsfall42
      @shadowsfall42 Рік тому +2

      Try not being able to solve a 2x2 for 6 years... this is the pain I carry everyday.

    • @otamota7563
      @otamota7563 Рік тому +1

      Honestly, if he spends about 8 hours a day on the puzzle, he could probably finish it in less than a week.

  • @seanbarraclough2484
    @seanbarraclough2484 Рік тому +158

    I'd leave it scrambled, and just admire it. Phenomenal creation.

  • @monkchips
    @monkchips Рік тому

    Really fun project. Easily as much fun as testing how long it takes for each stubbed toe to stop throbbing, dependant upon the order they are stubbed in.

  • @KoreyThatcher
    @KoreyThatcher 6 місяців тому

    This is bananas!

  • @Kewbix
    @Kewbix 2 роки тому +231

    Those were some really interesting analogies lol

  • @futbol9847
    @futbol9847 2 роки тому +212

    The fact he did this all from a 3D printer is insane. Plus it has stickers. Way to go man!

    • @djalexander968
      @djalexander968 Рік тому +10

      i used to get irritated when my 3x3 would lose a sticker... just imagine the anger that would incite on a rubik's that has more possible permutations that suns in the observable universe

    • @jayluck8047
      @jayluck8047 Рік тому

      The stickers could easily be done on a Cricut.

    • @Pimp.My.Forklift
      @Pimp.My.Forklift Рік тому

      A couple days ago I saw a 3d printed nerf gattling gun that could shoot 500 darts in 9 seconds, at this point I wouldn't be surprised if I read on the news that someone robbed a bank by tunneling under the vault with a 3d printed driveable mega drill.

    • @drsnova7313
      @drsnova7313 10 місяців тому

      I wonder why he didn't just print everything in different colors. Sounds far easier than applying all those stickers, and, more importantly, there's no chance of one falling off.

    • @jandedycker1748
      @jandedycker1748 5 місяців тому

      @@djalexander968 not just stars in the observable universe... PARTICLES in the observable universe.

  • @JayTEP
    @JayTEP Рік тому +1

    “ a 1 in 8.6x10^7924 that tonight a meteor will come hurting through the atmosphere and come smashing your bed”. Just what I needed to fall asleep

  • @ok-ky1ns
    @ok-ky1ns 10 місяців тому

    Look at this absolute unit of a puzzle

  • @enmysune
    @enmysune 2 роки тому +39

    every time i think coren's reached the limit, he just pulls out another one of these.
    this is absolutely incredible, your dedication is amazing. congrats on this huge accomplishment!

  • @GrahamSiggins
    @GrahamSiggins 2 роки тому +250

    Congrats on finishing this! Must feel amazing. Can’t believe you’re actually trying to solve it lol. I’ll wager a guess of 55 hours over the course of a few weeks

    • @GrahamSiggins
      @GrahamSiggins 2 роки тому +2

      Also thanks for the shoutout :)

    • @W4LRUS7769
      @W4LRUS7769 2 роки тому +3

      if this becomes mass produced, do multiblind with it

    • @adamgrundy4327
      @adamgrundy4327 2 роки тому +2

      i think it will be 70+ hours

    • @otamota7563
      @otamota7563 Рік тому

      I think it could be 48 hours

  • @mannyyoutube3259
    @mannyyoutube3259 Рік тому

    Looks really cool as a decoration piece for a lamp or a base when it's not solved, I could never solve it anyway.😱

  • @PestVic
    @PestVic 10 місяців тому

    This is insane!!

  • @laiscube
    @laiscube 2 роки тому +67

    I thought the Atlasminx was recent. Impressed that you surpassed it relatively quickly compared to how often such "size records" are broken. Pleasantly surprised to see the Moyu-styled multi-tiered mechanism. A proven way to get both stability and smoothness, as shown by the big Meilongs and the Moyu 21x21.

  • @aaronrattanachaipipat
    @aaronrattanachaipipat 2 роки тому +9

    I’m just so mindblowned you managed to pull this off. This Is such an amazing design!!! I’m just speechless the amount of effort you put into making this a reality!

  • @yaboikennymccormick
    @yaboikennymccormick 9 місяців тому +3

    Guy:What do you you do for a living?
    corenpuzzle: I make Rubik’s cubes.
    Guy: Oh, that’s cool
    core puzzle: HUGE ONES.

  • @ExoticLimeSlice
    @ExoticLimeSlice 11 місяців тому +1

    This is madness!

  • @epicroblox2955
    @epicroblox2955 2 роки тому +86

    The 21x21 rubiks cube takes 5-6 hours to solve, but the 21x21 version of a megaminx will take around 3 days is my guess. Especially since it's a lot more difficult to turn, and megaminxes take a lot longer to solve.

  • @SteppingRazor762
    @SteppingRazor762 Рік тому +41

    Just having the puzzle sitting on your desk scrambled makes it a pretty awesome piece of art 👍

  • @solarprogeny6736
    @solarprogeny6736 Рік тому

    I think it looks really good scrambled as a decoration and art piece

  • @hiedegabarda1204
    @hiedegabarda1204 11 місяців тому +2

    "Your heart beats faster, as you turn the minx of madness."

  • @mrs_plinkett
    @mrs_plinkett Рік тому +4

    i have never seen any content abt Rubik's cube before and still got very entertained and engaged by this video, so props for your wonderful work! both in regards to puzzle designing and videomaking. I'll definitely stick around now lol

  • @GalaxyBard
    @GalaxyBard Рік тому +9

    I wouldn't have guessed you could actually solve it 😯 That will be cool to see. That's a real piece of art you made there man! Thanks for sharing the video 🥰

  • @loudesbois2700
    @loudesbois2700 Рік тому

    Looks fun

  • @yang9919
    @yang9919 7 місяців тому

    You created the mix of madness

  • @bread4664
    @bread4664 2 роки тому +31

    This is completely insane. I am so happy I stumbled upon this. This really pushes the limits of consumer 3d printing. I am still impressed by printed 2x2 and 3x3s, much less this behemoth! Incredible work.
    My guess for the time is: 76 hrs

  • @CubesMadeEasy
    @CubesMadeEasy 2 роки тому +8

    Incredible work! Watching the assembly was super satisfying. It's crazy to me how well it seems to turn as well. My guess is 80 hours of pure solving time, although obviously you will be taking many breaks in between.

  • @Shroomkoobing69
    @Shroomkoobing69 11 місяців тому +1

    Legend says he’s still solving it

  • @infrabread
    @infrabread 2 роки тому +5

    In order to become insane, you must have been sane in the first place. Coren; you're a wonderful human being and I have loved every puzzle you have made.

  • @lethalbloom2147
    @lethalbloom2147 Рік тому +31

    Honestly I feel like it'll take at least a year to truly solve this monster

  • @nandovioliveira5056
    @nandovioliveira5056 Рік тому

    Masterpiece

  • @HypnoticGoon
    @HypnoticGoon 8 місяців тому +1

    Rumor has it he's still solving it a year later.

  • @cookiesyruplover
    @cookiesyruplover Рік тому +3

    I didn't expect the video to have the part where it's being assembled! With how insane it looked, I thought the entire video was just about solving it. I'm blown away with this puzzle. My guess is 250 hours in the course of months because self-care is important lol Glad to see people with their passions. I'm definitely watching the solving video.

  • @GregMakesThings
    @GregMakesThings 2 роки тому +24

    Well now I'm getting worried that your next record will beat the part count of the 33x33x33 haha ! That being said you beat the sticker count ! Well done man, always a pleasure to see you push the FDM envelope further and further !

  • @harrisonpanner355
    @harrisonpanner355 Рік тому

    Legend has it he’s still solving it

  • @zylanderr
    @zylanderr 2 роки тому +40

    Still easier to turn than a rubik's branded cube

  • @GODDAMNLETMEJOIN
    @GODDAMNLETMEJOIN 2 роки тому +19

    I'm not sure if your wrists will last long enough to solve it. Tens of thousands of turns and reorientations on a 10kg puzzle is hard work!

  • @Serenity_Dee
    @Serenity_Dee 6 місяців тому

    The denominator is to eliminate permutations that are only distinguished by overall orientation - that is, permutations that are identical save that the whole thing is rotated on an axis.
    As soon as I saw that equation, I knew that number would be on that order. Factorials scale up very, _very_ quickly.

  • @victordeluca7360
    @victordeluca7360 11 місяців тому

    Dude's conjuring a Rasengan by the end lol

  • @HorologicRannygazoo
    @HorologicRannygazoo Рік тому +8

    ummm, 200 hours. Fantastic job! The larger minxes aren't harder to solve from a solution perspective. But the weight of that puzzle, the sheer volume of turns it is going to take and the constant possibility of popping pieces out while still unsolved (I cringe at that possibility -- man). Just building it is staggeringly impressive. That is a serious synthesis of tech and art.

  • @ElricWilliam
    @ElricWilliam 2 роки тому +8

    Not much into solving them but they are hella fun to build, a few of my cubing friends have me build their stuff and honestly I love it xD

  • @drinny26
    @drinny26 10 місяців тому

    I can’t with these things. Just attempting to start a regular Rubix cube stresses me out. This is just going to give me nightmares. 😂

  • @anshulthapa2326
    @anshulthapa2326 Рік тому

    Legends believe he is still solving it.

  • @arlomoore
    @arlomoore 2 роки тому +10

    Your engineering skills are incredible! How did you get inspired to build things like this? I’m going to guess 73 hours and 24 minutes.

  • @kimirikscreations
    @kimirikscreations 2 роки тому +30

    That's a really impressive 3d print build. And omg does it give me anxiety just looking at it scrambled.

  • @ARegularFilipino
    @ARegularFilipino 11 місяців тому

    Thats alot of effort

  • @irenel9726
    @irenel9726 11 місяців тому

    Solving this and creating this is hell

  • @96_stars22
    @96_stars22 2 роки тому +3

    This is nothing short of incredible

  • @carljameson3082
    @carljameson3082 2 роки тому +5

    This man stared directly into the abyss and his body started moving on its own until this accursed artifact was complete. That's the only reason I can think of why someone would create this

  • @mysterioussideofthemoonPOC
    @mysterioussideofthemoonPOC Рік тому +1

    I think I would go insane solving this.

  • @Canine-playground
    @Canine-playground 11 місяців тому

    I couldn’t stop saying omg while watching this

  • @matthewwhitt5249
    @matthewwhitt5249 Рік тому +6

    1 year for an experienced solver... and that's it. No one else, is unscrambling that.

  • @droidicalwars38
    @droidicalwars38 2 роки тому +10

    I SHUDDERED TO DEATH WHEN I SAW IT!!! also, the exoskeleton of it looks nice.

  • @mburton1983
    @mburton1983 Рік тому

    Ur so lucky man to have a 3d prinder :O i wish i owned one

  • @rpg247a
    @rpg247a Рік тому +1

    If I'm going to die in my sleep by getting smashed to death by 616 meteorites, then I officially blame this video for my death.

  • @codproyo7798
    @codproyo7798 2 роки тому +5

    Me trying to solve it when I was 10: this is gonna be easy!
    999 year old me: done!

  • @JJCuber27
    @JJCuber27 2 роки тому +3

    Are you actually kidding me, I thought that the Atlasminx would be the limit but you’ve managed to prove me wrong.
    Congrats on making this puzzle but I can’t believe you actually scrambled it lol

  • @mrgreatauk
    @mrgreatauk Рік тому

    Dude hasn't posted in a year because he's still trying to solve this beast

  • @ethereal3679
    @ethereal3679 9 місяців тому

    The early stages of making this thing look like the most sinister way to contain something that could blow up a universe.

  • @cubingsummarized950
    @cubingsummarized950 2 роки тому +4

    Incredible! I would say 4-5 days to solve the puzzle.

  • @harrymacdonald2672
    @harrymacdonald2672 2 роки тому +9

    My guess is 87 hours. Can't wait to see it solved again!

  • @SrBluOff
    @SrBluOff Рік тому

    21x21 dodecahedron. Impressive!

  • @daftlife-ns5hc
    @daftlife-ns5hc 10 місяців тому

    i had a teraminx once. i had already solved it a few times. then one time, one turn, KABOOM. pieces went everywhere. i still have it in a bag somewhere lol

  • @nubbyderg
    @nubbyderg 2 роки тому +3

    The Teratominx sounds like a fitting name for this, because it's a MONSTER.

  • @lethaldrew5804
    @lethaldrew5804 Рік тому +10

    Genuine question, would it have been easier to make this puzzle stickerless rather than sticker it by hand? I mean, i know it would make piece design atleast a little harder for the edge/corner pieces, but if you didn't have to sticker all the tiny center piece it probably would've been easier right? Especially since you can just put a different color filament in the printer and you're good to go. Idk just my random thought.

    • @cheers9430
      @cheers9430 Рік тому +1

      just like paint a whole side it's big enough

    • @pickyyeeter
      @pickyyeeter 9 місяців тому

      Considering that several pieces contain more than one color of sticker, they way he did it seems easier to me

  • @michaelcharlesthearchangel
    @michaelcharlesthearchangel 11 місяців тому

    An engineering marvel 🎁

  • @pcrdragon8097
    @pcrdragon8097 9 місяців тому

    He just made every cuber's nightmare

  • @paulchan7297
    @paulchan7297 2 роки тому +5

    while I'm totally down with calling this Minx of Madness, what would be the actually name base on the number of layers? Or does it not go that high?

  • @rustyshackleford9588
    @rustyshackleford9588 Рік тому +5

    Putting it together is almost as impressive as solving it.

  • @420alfonzo6
    @420alfonzo6 Рік тому +1

    You know the math is serious when the numbers got exclamation marks.

  • @RICOFRITO
    @RICOFRITO 10 місяців тому +1

    I'm no math expert but when you put exclamation points in that mathematical equations my brain goes hmmm must be scary big number... yes... number be big!

  • @panickednoodle
    @panickednoodle 2 роки тому +4

    Having to place all those individual stickers must have been madness

  • @quikbale
    @quikbale 2 роки тому +10

    My guess is he filmed the maths after he solved the cube to feel better about the solve time 😂

  • @emu21
    @emu21 6 місяців тому

    621 hours
    Nice work

  • @RW1A
    @RW1A Рік тому

    The way this is built could be a good device to make an explosive device out of that can't be disarmed except by solving the puzzle.
    Idk why i thought of this first.

  • @ka1ebsauce
    @ka1ebsauce 2 роки тому +3

    dear god... i wouldnt wish the solving of this puzzle upon my greatest enemies, let alone the set up.

  • @kataevnikolay2902
    @kataevnikolay2902 2 роки тому +20

    Как круто крутится. У меня нет слов, это самое крутое, что я видел за последний год!