03:25 Potentially one of the most accurate insights I have ever heard as to why people, [me included] consistently attract things unwanted in opposition to things desired. That fake 'layer' that is the imitation 'home place' that hides the deeper, authentic layer of the true self. Elegant and sublime as always Mr Spira.
Exquisite communication of a man using direct perception and lovingly tuning in to a choice of words that describes the outline of something obscure to most.
I'd really love for Rupert's video about the queen to come back online. Taking it down serves no purpose except hiding his views/experiences. No one is perfect here, we all have beliefs that have been ingrained in our minds. Showing Rupert as a normal human serves humanity better than portraying him as an all knowing perfect being. Too often spiritual leaders are being shown in this way. I think it's time to humanize them. Time for them to show their weaknesses, their imperfections. It's so hard to find spiritual leaders who don't have a narrative or a perfect public image to preserve. Most act as if their mind/ego doesn't have a place in them anymore... and I'm simply not buying that. Rupert, use my feedback as you please, it has no ill intention. I also absolutely accept I could be wrong. I love you brother, and I thank you for the many qualities of your being that you share with us. So anyway, here's the message I left on the queen's video, I was editing it just as the video was deleted: "It's sad how so many people still adore the most powerful. Slaves defending the enslavers. Knowing oneself and spirituality aren't only about nonduality realization. There's work to be done in this 3D dual world, and the first thing in the list is pointing at the monsters who have been working hard for centuries to keep humanity in misery. Seeing Rupert doing the complete opposite is disheartening and signals how far we still are from being free. Free from the duality of our minds, but also free from the chains of a system designed to create suffering, maintained by a few families such as the queen's. I can understand an analysis about the symbolism of the monarchy, there's lots to talk about in that regard, but Rupert you've gone far beyond that. You literally said: "in her actions as much as her words she demonstrated the qualities that must be the foundation of a society that wishes to live in peace within itself, with its neighbors and with the environment". As humanity, I wish us to awaken from this long slumber we're in. Not just with pretty words and metaphors (very much needed), but also with loving action to rid ourselves from these parasites".
@@lizg5761 He spoke very beautifully about how she dedicated her life to service. He described a scene from 'The Crown' where she was on a plane with Phillip waiting to take off for a tour of the Commonwealth. Winston Churchill came onto the plane and said to her 'Remember that you represent Eternity' (or something like that, sorry I can't remember the exact words). Rupert used the example of the Queen's political impartiality as an analogy of the impartiality of the Absolute. 💗🙏
It’s a little distasteful and disturbing if he made a video praising her. Sure she was a frail old woman and did a job that she was forced into really. But what she represented- colonisation, enslavement, domination of indigenous peoples, violence is not what one could call very ‘spiritual’. As for her family and friends (J.Savile amongst other despicable humans), my comments are best left unsaid. Rupert I really think you should stay out of this one. I didn’t hate the Queen nor did I wish her dead. She was what she was, the last vestiges of a dying empire.
Psychology should at least investigate the nature of the mind, for the mind is the origin of understanding where sensations, feelings, emotions and perceptions arise, a step further is consciousness which is the source of the mind. I hope that one day this will happen in science. Rupert always shows a deep psychology as well as an understanding of what lies beyond.
The field of psychology has begun doing this. There are hundreds of studies on meditation, for example. In fact, I predict that in the future the field of psychology will replace both religion and spirituality and gurus, and spiritual teachers like Rupert.
@@LinguisticLifeform I agree about the materialism belief system being incompatible with truth, but science in and of itself is not a materialist belief system, if it is in search of truth, which is what ideal science represents. Material reductionism is not science. It is a belief system. Regarding your second point about diverse ways: The underlying themes of the pursuit of truth can be categorized, so all the diversity can fit under one umbrella. By analogy, the field of nutrition states that people need nutrients. Of course, that is very individualized and can change over time for the same person. Do we need to create a new field for each nutrient or can we just call the field nutritional science and then address each person as needed?
But then people will have the tools to heal themselves and will not need to see a therapist on an ongoing basis. The therapist may be out of a job lol.
sehr feinfühlig analysiert, scheint für mich wahr zu sein. was kann ich in der Praxis umsetzen ? "Jedesmal wenn ich nicht in eine Aktivität eingebunden bin, dem Ego keinen Raum geben indem ich in mir das Gefühl göttlicher Liebe und Friedens vergegenwärtige und beibehalte. Wo Liebe oder Frieden ist da kann keine Angst sein.
La vie s'efforce à soi même vivre et à faire l’expérience d'elle même le plus diversifié possible, que ce soit en tant que matière, en tant qu’esprit ou quoi que ce soit.
birds sounds is sensation of the ear. Feeling = sensation + thoughts, than ppl have feelings for jesus? what is the sensation here for jesus? and where are the thoughts here?
Rupert, somehow i always hear what I need when I listen to you speak. This explanation is exactly what I needed to hear to help with my practice of allowing feelings as they are and being curious instead of resisting and seeking something outside to make the feeling go away. Thank you as always for sharing your wisdom with us. You have a so relatable way of explaining. Much love.
I don't think Rupert is correct about the higher emotions of love, peace, and joy. If awareness has different qualities, then we aren't describing awareness. Awareness is unchanging. It is in the movement of the mind that we feel love, joy, hope, happiness, irritation, anger, fear, depression. These are all levels of how much we shut off pure awareness. If I showed you a flute, but you had never seen a flute before, and I asked you what sound it made, then you would have no idea. The flute is very real, but you need something else to know its sound. You need breath for the perfectly still flute to have sound. Just as a flute needs breath in order to know its sound, awareness needs mind in order to perceive its characteristics. Without mind, awareness is pure stillness. This is highly consistent with Rupert's teachings on awareness, yet he contradicts himself frequently. This is why there seems to be different types of love. There is the type of love that promotes unity, kindness, gentleness, and peace. Then there is the type of love that is perfect allowance, the love that allows wars, rape, and torture just as it allows feeding the poor, helping the impoverished, and healing the sick. How can the love that promotes kindness also allow torture? Those do not go together. The reason they don't go together because one is love in its essence. This is awareness. The other is love in action. The reason these two states of love seem so contradictory is because one experiences itself as love and one experiences itself becoming love. Awareness is love as being. Mind is love becoming. Mind is the concept of not being love. But everything IS love, and thus mind is forever, gloriously, becoming love and it understands deeper and deeper.
This is also how and why you can have to different yet eternal states of being (for a lacks of better words). There is static love which is inherently eternal and then there is becoming love which derives its being from static love (awareness) because it's whole purpose is to know and see and experience static awareness. This is why "becoming aware" and "raising your consciousness" is synonymous with knowing god or becoming spiritual. That is exactly what mind is doing, becoming aware of God! And this is what the Bible describes when Luke says "in [The Father] I live and breath and have my being" and when Jesus said "I came from the Father and have come into the world; again, I am leaving the world and going to the Father.” How does Rupert not know this?
AND this is why mind is portrayed as the Son and awareness as the Father. The Son comes from the Father in their relationship and all the fruits that the Son experiences in becoming the Father come from the Father because they ARE the Father. How does Rupert not know this?
I Am is prior to the sense of lack. The sense of lack is merely a thought, convincing though it may be. It is an appearance in I-Awareness, a paper tiger :)
as long as EMOTIONS rule your LIFE you will come back here and reincarnate on a planet more difficult than the earth for learbing as long as you need to learn
I think I have experienced anger and fear with no accompanying story….so I don’t fully agree with Rupert here. Perhaps sometimes the story is at play in the subconscious…
Fear and lack(fear OF lack)....innate condition of all sentient life which then seek food or sustenance(mental satisfaction) to allay the fear of lack. It's part of the motivating life force... The words thought, emotion, feeling, sensation can be used synonymously and there is a veritable Alexandrian library of psychiatry and psychology that traces it's roots to these words........The differences between them are dynamic and interpreted according to the zeitgeist, and, by a bullshitty guru like figure if you don't have the courage of your own convictions to interpret for yourself.
You seem to be talking about _attraction_ and _aversion,_ which are the primary poles of valence. These in themselves are not the cause of psychological suffering. Rather, their egoic counterparts, _attachment_ and _resistance,_ are where things get _personal._ The terms themselves may overlap, but there is an important difference: _identifying_ with the objects or ideas in question. That is, when we say, "x represents me and mine, while y represents the enemy", _this_ is when the ego comes in. If we identify with certain things or phenomena, we then feel pain when those elements are lacking. Likewise, we feel pain in the presence of the unwanted. Moreover, the very thought of losing or lacking the object of attachment brings suffering. Similarly, the thought of the object of resistance brings feelings of uneasiness or even anger. The key distinction here is the involvement of the ego, which is all about identity and separation.
@@FalseCogs I seem to be talking about attraction and aversion? No I'm SIMPLY casting a low opinion of psychology that plays with semantics, misnomers and neologisms to create an intellectual miasma filled with bullshit...I'm averting attraction to attract aversion!
@@jonathanross812 Some concepts lack well-defined or at least well-known terminology. I imagine there are better ways to describe and delineate these ideas, but then we might run into unfamiliar terminology, which may be a problem when teaching the general public. I agree that the terms are often used in ways that disagree with other usages. But this problem exists across all sorts of fields. Each community has its own interpretations and connotations for terms used by other communities. If you are suggesting the language is _intentionally_ misleading, I will have to disagree. From a neurological standpoint, the aim of spiritual awakening is to shift from the logical, egoic, division-centric left hemisphere to the holistic, intuitive right hemisphere. This is an oversimplification, but it gives the gist. To allow walking away from the logic system, we have to reach the intuition system, which is inherently tricky and not necessarily logical. Conventional language may not be well fit, hence the weirdness. Where the ego comes in is that its nature is heavy on logic. When the ego -- that is, social self-preservation -- is riled up, it generally riles up the logic system. This is why calming the ego by embracing oneness and interconnection helps with liberation. It allows the logic system to relax, which allows the holistic, intuition system to shine. Humans in general are quite social, hence being egocentric. Modern society pushes it overboard by creating massive competition, with pervasive messages of insufficiency. This creates a lot of dissonance and hence suffering.
@@FalseCogs Dear Mr False Cogs.....I am a computer programmer a six handicap golfer, a good guitarist and reasonable artist. I have been an IT salesman; and , my best life experience is 30 years in the care of mental health for trauma induced schizophrenia. I am also extremely ambi dextrous. The ego of a person which seems to be the prevailing fixation can be understood through self observation that can be obtained through a hermetic life style...this is the path to greater self awareness. I do hard physical exercise and I meditate. Singularity judged by duality is the nature of the universe, so I practice both for so called enlightenment.
@@FalseCogs Dear Mr False Cogs ... I am not a computer programmer, I've never played golf, I'm a godawful guitarist and I'm only right handed. I do hard physical labour chopping out weeds and scooping up chook poo. I also spend hours every day observing birds and wallabies and clouds and spider webs shimmering in the sun. I really enjoyed your responses.
No teaching here. Only illusion. Danger. Confusion. Thought and emotion is time. Therefore no matter how many of these things you go to. If you do not understand that. Then real change can never take place. Because no change can ever be achieved by steps and time or by words of Gurus. The word is never the thing.
EMOTION AND FEELING IS VERY DIFFERENT FEELING COMES FROM THEV HEART AND EMOTION FROM THE STOMACHREGION EMOTION ARE HEGATIVE LOKE HATRED ANGER ENVY AND SO ON
This video explicates a rather course, misleading and seriously incomplete understanding of these terms… And worse, it reinforces and encourages destructively mechanistic ways of entry into a huge fecund terrain of shapeshifting movement, change and discovery... Manners of entry that will always and forever completely obfuscate the evolutionary possibilities of alive spirit REALizing itself as the understandings and evolutionary journeys of One inseparable whole eternally unfolding out of itself, forever transcendent yet eternally transcending all dimensions of time, space and matter… Words like Thoughts, Emotions, Feelings and Perceptions are meant to point to our own inner movements, and should never attempt to define and delineate what they are pointing to… We must define our languages, yes, but never define what language is for, and what it must serve, if we truly seek to experience and be, rather than merely and temporarily “know” (falsely), what we always and already are… It is not the stories we make out of experience but the very experience itself that reveals meaning… Real is always now, and true meaning merely shows us the way, like road signs that we are forever leaving behind, as we slowly disappear into this infinite emptiness we have never not been…
No. It is feeling, perception, thoughts and emotions. You completely messed up the order in the title of the video. Why? Do you not want people to know emotions are the farthest thing from reality
Rupert i want to express love and gratitude for your teachings and role.
No lo entiendi muy bien ,pero lo continuare repitiendo ,muchas gracias Rupert por tus enseñanzas ¡¡¡
03:25 Potentially one of the most accurate insights I have ever heard as to why people, [me included] consistently attract things unwanted in opposition to things desired. That fake 'layer' that is the imitation 'home place' that hides the deeper, authentic layer of the true self. Elegant and sublime as always Mr Spira.
Thank you Rupert. You bring in immense clarity. My gratitude again.
People are so relatable in their inquiry with Rupert most of the time.
Wow this has affected me
May we always go “all the way back”. Thanks, Rupert.
Somehow... and I have no idea why... you had me crying in the first 3 minutes with your explanations. Thank you.
Exquisite communication of a man using direct perception and lovingly tuning in to a choice of words that describes the outline of something obscure to most.
Thoughts (words) become things.
They always precede feelings.
This is soo deep. Thank you rupert.
Years of wisdom.
Blessed clarity!🙏
Thank u for ur clarity.
Thank you for sharing you wisdom in such a beautiful way ❤️
Qué claridad!!!! Muchísimas gracias!!! 🤗❤️🙏
I'd really love for Rupert's video about the queen to come back online. Taking it down serves no purpose except hiding his views/experiences. No one is perfect here, we all have beliefs that have been ingrained in our minds. Showing Rupert as a normal human serves humanity better than portraying him as an all knowing perfect being.
Too often spiritual leaders are being shown in this way. I think it's time to humanize them. Time for them to show their weaknesses, their imperfections. It's so hard to find spiritual leaders who don't have a narrative or a perfect public image to preserve. Most act as if their mind/ego doesn't have a place in them anymore... and I'm simply not buying that.
Rupert, use my feedback as you please, it has no ill intention. I also absolutely accept I could be wrong. I love you brother, and I thank you for the many qualities of your being that you share with us.
So anyway, here's the message I left on the queen's video, I was editing it just as the video was deleted:
"It's sad how so many people still adore the most powerful. Slaves defending the enslavers.
Knowing oneself and spirituality aren't only about nonduality realization. There's work to be done in this 3D dual world, and the first thing in the list is pointing at the monsters who have been working hard for centuries to keep humanity in misery. Seeing Rupert doing the complete opposite is disheartening and signals how far we still are from being free. Free from the duality of our minds, but also free from the chains of a system designed to create suffering, maintained by a few families such as the queen's.
I can understand an analysis about the symbolism of the monarchy, there's lots to talk about in that regard, but Rupert you've gone far beyond that. You literally said: "in her actions as much as her words she demonstrated the qualities that must be the foundation of a society that wishes to live in peace within itself, with its neighbors and with the environment".
As humanity, I wish us to awaken from this long slumber we're in. Not just with pretty words and metaphors (very much needed), but also with loving action to rid ourselves from these parasites".
What did he say about the queen? Aside from what you quoted. I did t get to watch.
@@lizg5761 He spoke very beautifully about how she dedicated her life to service. He described a scene from 'The Crown' where she was on a plane with Phillip waiting to take off for a tour of the Commonwealth. Winston Churchill came onto the plane and said to her 'Remember that you represent Eternity' (or something like that, sorry I can't remember the exact words). Rupert used the example of the Queen's political impartiality as an analogy of the impartiality of the Absolute. 💗🙏
In another occurence, Rupert said he hates Putin, so no hope is lost, he is well human, after all.
Thank you! I accidentally hit the thumbs down.🙃 Sorry! I support kindness and love as well🙏🏼
It’s a little distasteful and disturbing if he made a video praising her. Sure she was a frail old woman and did a job that she was forced into really. But what she represented- colonisation, enslavement, domination of indigenous peoples, violence is not what one could call very ‘spiritual’. As for her family and friends (J.Savile amongst other despicable humans), my comments are best left unsaid. Rupert I really think you should stay out of this one. I didn’t hate the Queen nor did I wish her dead. She was what she was, the last vestiges of a dying empire.
Go all the way back, resonates within!!! Thank you ❤️
One of the most lucid and relatable descriptions of dukkha (unsatisfactoriness) I've ever heard. 🙏
Beautiful as always Rupert love love love 🙏
gratitude for this!!! thanks❤️
Awesome.
Psychology should at least investigate the nature of the mind, for the mind is the origin of understanding where sensations, feelings, emotions and perceptions arise, a step further is consciousness which is the source of the mind. I hope that one day this will happen in science.
Rupert always shows a deep psychology as well as an understanding of what lies beyond.
The field of psychology has begun doing this. There are hundreds of studies on meditation, for example. In fact, I predict that in the future the field of psychology will replace both religion and spirituality and gurus, and spiritual teachers like Rupert.
@@LinguisticLifeform I agree about the materialism belief system being incompatible with truth, but science in and of itself is not a materialist belief system, if it is in search of truth, which is what ideal science represents. Material reductionism is not science. It is a belief system. Regarding your second point about diverse ways: The underlying themes of the pursuit of truth can be categorized, so all the diversity can fit under one umbrella. By analogy, the field of nutrition states that people need nutrients. Of course, that is very individualized and can change over time for the same person. Do we need to create a new field for each nutrient or can we just call the field nutritional science and then address each person as needed?
But then people will have the tools to heal themselves and will not need to see a therapist on an ongoing basis. The therapist may be out of a job lol.
@@SamStone1964 That's the point, isn't it. We will all be therapists and gurus.
@@sanekabc That was my lame attempt at humour :)
Brilliant
Thank you x
sehr feinfühlig analysiert, scheint für mich wahr zu sein. was kann ich in der Praxis umsetzen ? "Jedesmal wenn ich nicht in eine Aktivität eingebunden bin, dem Ego keinen Raum geben indem ich in mir das Gefühl göttlicher Liebe und Friedens vergegenwärtige und beibehalte. Wo Liebe oder Frieden ist da kann keine Angst sein.
My measurement is between my desire and allowing. My emotions/feelings tell me everything about that.
Would you please elaborate? I don't understand this "measurement" and what you're measuring, but it sounds intriguing
Thank you💗 That last veil is very subtle.
This is all very well; but how do we break through the screensaver to the authentic reality?
La vie s'efforce à soi même vivre et à faire l’expérience d'elle même le plus diversifié possible, que ce soit en tant que matière, en tant qu’esprit ou quoi que ce soit.
Did you delete the video about the queen?
I'm not seeing it anymore
Hopefully it'll be re-uploaded.
It was made private, and was not deleted i think
I heard it this morning, it was a lovely heartfelt tribute to the Queen from Rupert.
@@DarthVegas1 can you link?
HELP: Does anyone know if there are more videos Rupert talking about The existential feeling of lack & fear? Thanks
birds sounds is sensation of the ear. Feeling = sensation + thoughts, than ppl have feelings for jesus? what is the sensation here for jesus? and where are the thoughts here?
Rupert, somehow i always hear what I need when I listen to you speak. This explanation is exactly what I needed to hear to help with my practice of allowing feelings as they are and being curious instead of resisting and seeking something outside to make the feeling go away. Thank you as always for sharing your wisdom with us. You have a so relatable way of explaining. Much love.
🙏❤️
🎯
🙏🙏🙏
Thank you for your efforts in educating beautiful people of the planet Earth ❤️☀️🌙
When we get stuck by our own screen saver, we jump to drinking or dope or meth. Instead of going out to meet friends as he mentioned.
5' 20" most people .....
Very well put 🙏
I don't think Rupert is correct about the higher emotions of love, peace, and joy. If awareness has different qualities, then we aren't describing awareness. Awareness is unchanging. It is in the movement of the mind that we feel love, joy, hope, happiness, irritation, anger, fear, depression. These are all levels of how much we shut off pure awareness.
If I showed you a flute, but you had never seen a flute before, and I asked you what sound it made, then you would have no idea. The flute is very real, but you need something else to know its sound. You need breath for the perfectly still flute to have sound.
Just as a flute needs breath in order to know its sound, awareness needs mind in order to perceive its characteristics. Without mind, awareness is pure stillness.
This is highly consistent with Rupert's teachings on awareness, yet he contradicts himself frequently.
This is why there seems to be different types of love. There is the type of love that promotes unity, kindness, gentleness, and peace. Then there is the type of love that is perfect allowance, the love that allows wars, rape, and torture just as it allows feeding the poor, helping the impoverished, and healing the sick. How can the love that promotes kindness also allow torture?
Those do not go together. The reason they don't go together because one is love in its essence. This is awareness. The other is love in action. The reason these two states of love seem so contradictory is because one experiences itself as love and one experiences itself becoming love.
Awareness is love as being. Mind is love becoming. Mind is the concept of not being love. But everything IS love, and thus mind is forever, gloriously, becoming love and it understands deeper and deeper.
This is also how and why you can have to different yet eternal states of being (for a lacks of better words). There is static love which is inherently eternal and then there is becoming love which derives its being from static love (awareness) because it's whole purpose is to know and see and experience static awareness.
This is why "becoming aware" and "raising your consciousness" is synonymous with knowing god or becoming spiritual. That is exactly what mind is doing, becoming aware of God!
And this is what the Bible describes when Luke says "in [The Father] I live and breath and have my being" and when Jesus said "I came from the Father and have come into the world; again, I am leaving the world and going to the Father.”
How does Rupert not know this?
AND this is why mind is portrayed as the Son and awareness as the Father. The Son comes from the Father in their relationship and all the fruits that the Son experiences in becoming the Father come from the Father because they ARE the Father.
How does Rupert not know this?
I Am is prior to the sense of lack. The sense of lack is merely a thought, convincing though it may be. It is an appearance in I-Awareness, a paper tiger :)
Joy. Nietzsche got stuck here.🙏
as long as EMOTIONS rule your LIFE you will come back here and reincarnate on a planet more difficult than the earth for learbing as long as you need to learn
Emotions are your guidance system to expand into more joy.
How much I learn with you! 1,000,000 thanks
Wow 😳
I think I have experienced anger and fear with no accompanying story….so I don’t fully agree with Rupert here. Perhaps sometimes the story is at play in the subconscious…
Perhaps you have to peel back some layers to get to the accompanying story.
I see feelings are just intense energy. When we allow them to stay without resistance then they leave.
💛🧡🩷💜
Gold 😂
I need food, no….it would be fun to have food! ✅
Fear and lack(fear OF lack)....innate condition of all sentient life which then seek food or sustenance(mental satisfaction) to allay the fear of lack. It's part of the motivating life force...
The words thought, emotion, feeling, sensation can be used synonymously and there is a veritable Alexandrian library of psychiatry and psychology that traces it's roots to these words........The differences between them are dynamic and interpreted according to the zeitgeist, and, by a bullshitty guru like figure if you don't have the courage of your own convictions to interpret for yourself.
You seem to be talking about _attraction_ and _aversion,_ which are the primary poles of valence. These in themselves are not the cause of psychological suffering. Rather, their egoic counterparts, _attachment_ and _resistance,_ are where things get _personal._ The terms themselves may overlap, but there is an important difference: _identifying_ with the objects or ideas in question. That is, when we say, "x represents me and mine, while y represents the enemy", _this_ is when the ego comes in. If we identify with certain things or phenomena, we then feel pain when those elements are lacking. Likewise, we feel pain in the presence of the unwanted. Moreover, the very thought of losing or lacking the object of attachment brings suffering. Similarly, the thought of the object of resistance brings feelings of uneasiness or even anger. The key distinction here is the involvement of the ego, which is all about identity and separation.
@@FalseCogs I seem to be talking about attraction and aversion? No I'm SIMPLY casting a low opinion of psychology that plays with semantics, misnomers and neologisms to create an intellectual miasma filled with bullshit...I'm averting attraction to attract aversion!
@@jonathanross812 Some concepts lack well-defined or at least well-known terminology. I imagine there are better ways to describe and delineate these ideas, but then we might run into unfamiliar terminology, which may be a problem when teaching the general public. I agree that the terms are often used in ways that disagree with other usages. But this problem exists across all sorts of fields. Each community has its own interpretations and connotations for terms used by other communities.
If you are suggesting the language is _intentionally_ misleading, I will have to disagree. From a neurological standpoint, the aim of spiritual awakening is to shift from the logical, egoic, division-centric left hemisphere to the holistic, intuitive right hemisphere. This is an oversimplification, but it gives the gist. To allow walking away from the logic system, we have to reach the intuition system, which is inherently tricky and not necessarily logical. Conventional language may not be well fit, hence the weirdness.
Where the ego comes in is that its nature is heavy on logic. When the ego -- that is, social self-preservation -- is riled up, it generally riles up the logic system. This is why calming the ego by embracing oneness and interconnection helps with liberation. It allows the logic system to relax, which allows the holistic, intuition system to shine. Humans in general are quite social, hence being egocentric. Modern society pushes it overboard by creating massive competition, with pervasive messages of insufficiency. This creates a lot of dissonance and hence suffering.
@@FalseCogs Dear Mr False Cogs.....I am a computer programmer a six handicap golfer, a good guitarist and reasonable artist. I have been an IT salesman; and , my best life experience is 30 years in the care of mental health for trauma induced schizophrenia. I am also extremely ambi dextrous. The ego of a person which seems to be the prevailing fixation can be understood through self observation that can be obtained through a hermetic life style...this is the path to greater self awareness. I do hard physical exercise and I meditate. Singularity judged by duality is the nature of the universe, so I practice both for so called enlightenment.
@@FalseCogs Dear Mr False Cogs ... I am not a computer programmer, I've never played golf, I'm a godawful guitarist and I'm only right handed. I do hard physical labour chopping out weeds and scooping up chook poo. I also spend hours every day observing birds and wallabies and clouds and spider webs shimmering in the sun. I really enjoyed your responses.
No teaching here.
Only illusion.
Danger.
Confusion.
Thought and emotion is time.
Therefore no matter how many of these things you go to. If you do not understand that. Then real change can never take place. Because no change can ever be achieved by steps and time or by words of Gurus.
The word is never the thing.
EMOTION AND FEELING IS VERY DIFFERENT FEELING COMES FROM THEV HEART AND EMOTION FROM THE STOMACHREGION EMOTION ARE HEGATIVE LOKE HATRED ANGER ENVY AND SO ON
WHY ARE YOU YELLING?
What this Talking Head does not tell you .... A Feeling is a Signature in Vibration ....
This video explicates a rather course, misleading and seriously incomplete understanding of these terms…
And worse, it reinforces and encourages destructively mechanistic ways of entry into a huge fecund terrain of shapeshifting movement, change and discovery...
Manners of entry that will always and forever completely obfuscate the evolutionary possibilities of alive spirit REALizing itself as the understandings and evolutionary journeys of One inseparable whole eternally unfolding out of itself, forever transcendent yet eternally transcending all dimensions of time, space and matter…
Words like Thoughts, Emotions, Feelings and Perceptions are meant to point to our own inner movements, and should never attempt to define and delineate what they are pointing to… We must define our languages, yes, but never define what language is for, and what it must serve, if we truly seek to experience and be, rather than merely and temporarily “know” (falsely), what we always and already are…
It is not the stories we make out of experience but the very experience itself that reveals meaning… Real is always now, and true meaning merely shows us the way, like road signs that we are forever leaving behind, as we slowly disappear into this infinite emptiness we have never not been…
No. It is feeling, perception, thoughts and emotions. You completely messed up the order in the title of the video. Why? Do you not want people to know emotions are the farthest thing from reality
Perhaps we could just agree to alphabetise it so nobody gets messed up?
@@SamStone1964 because that's the proper order
@@cj992 Would you expand on that?
@@SamStone1964 five aggregates in Buddhism
@@SamStone1964 it deletes my comments or I would tell you
💐