Ukraine war: will China be the real winner?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 чер 2024
- As war grinds on in Ukraine, and Zelensky vies for dominance, it is possible there may only be one true winner: China's leader Xi Jinping. But why could China come out on top? The Economist's Beijing bureau chief explains.
00:00 - China: Ukraine’s real winner?
00:40 - China claims to be neutral
01:32 - Both sides need China’s support
02:52 - Russia’s loss would be China’s gain
Like our video content? Take part in our audience research to tell us why: econ.st/3Ptio4z
Sign up to The Economist’s daily newsletter: econ.st/3QAawvI
Subscribe to The Economist’s defence newsletter: econ.st/3NLaXES
Ukraine at war: All of our coverage of the war in one place: econ.st/3PwevfA
Henry Kissinger explains how to avoid world war three:
econ.st/3XJMdAl
At last, Xi Jinping calls Volodymyr Zelensky: econ.st/3ra0byU
Will Xi Jinping outsmart Emmanuel Macron?
econ.st/44oICJJ
Chinese arms could revive Russia’s failing war:
econ.st/43Tzqxj
The conflict in Ukraine risks inflaming the Sino-American rivalry:
econ.st/3r53zLx
Why Vladimir Putin is not a pariah in China:
econ.st/3PvTOjP
Will Taiwan be the Ukraine of Asia?:
econ.st/3PzWnRH
Xi Jinping won’t ditch Vladimir Putin, for now:
econ.st/46ooFEW
“The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.”
-Sun Tzu
"Yes，I said that."
-Sun Tzu
nope; "the supreme art of war is how to subdued your future enemy to fight your current one"
Why did anyone think China offer to buy Russia's oil/gas-etc at a premium during the Beijing Game;
"We'll help offset the financial sanction, Go for Ukraine buddy, we'll politically assist you"
Then nearly all of Beijing media is on Moscow's side and some even were echoing "This battle will be over in days or 2 weeks" ; RT was even saying Zlensky had fled which is ironic when Putin was the one that did when Wagner came close to Moscow"
It was smart for Beijing not to get directly improved in the actual fighting so it will weaken Russia and make it its underlining in the future (as long as it doesn't fall apart)
@@elony3702 不战而屈人之兵，he said that.
He actually said that
Haha he did say that.
Stand for russia --china's mistake
Stand for Ukraine --china's mistake
Maintain neutral --china's mistake
Talking crazy - White Rubbish's mistakes
China exists --china's mistake
in the eyes of the white man. china can do no right.
Stand for Ukraine, definitely US’s mistake. All other countries should be neutral
The US has 800+ military bases around the world. China has only 1. It is the US we should be worried about. The US has been at war 93% of the time - 227 out of 245 years - since its founding in 1776. i.e. the U.S. has only been at peace for less than 20 years total since its birth.
History teaches us lessons about how it’s easier to blame others than blame ourselves.
The greatest danger we face today is not coming from China.
Has the US paid high price for attacking Iraq? It looks like one super power did get away without consequences
USA: At lest the people of Iraq have the Human Right now, is't it?
You can add Serbia as well.
@@snowlee-ml7rri don't think so
West is full of hypocrisy on the war crimes they did many many times around the world!
Why Should the USA Pay a Price for freeing the Shias & Kurds from Chemical Weapons used on them ?
Actually US is the biggest beneficiary. US is selling weapons to Europe/Ukraine . The higher cost of energy in Europe has forced EU companie to ship high paying manufacturing to the US.
Why would Europe "ship high paying manufacturing jobs to the US"? Why not India? they have cheap energy.
@@garypope6382 Because India has a comparatively small high-skilled manufacturing capability. The US remains by far at the head of the pack, despite mid and low-skilled manufacturing being ceded to other countries.
@@garypope6382 Because of domestic Subsidies given by Biden .For example see the inflation reduction act , and the effect on ev industry .
Only short term
US is not selling but providing weapons worth billions of dollars for FREE
“Might means might” …. That’s how the US has operated in the past 70 years against other countries. And “Russia doesn’t pay a high price for its aggression…”… the US has never paid for their aggression starting wars and coups in other countries either (neither has the UK if you want to go back further in history).
Do you not see this as applying a different set of rules to countries outside the US/NATO alliance, not based on fairness.
Also, DO NOT FORGET how WW2 (in Europe) happened, what was Germany forced to do after WW1?? (They were forced to pay reparations for anyone who doesn’t know) and how did that work out?
We don’t want another one. 🕊️☮️
From where you are?
@@salihmahdi7742 This planet that we all live on is enough to know
WOW VERY DANGEROUS SIR! 😠😠BUT THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗
USA did what they did to create a Free Market Democratic World Order.
Russia & China want to bully their neighbors and Annex their Lands based off History Books.
Name 1 Country that did not deserve Sanctions ?
totally agree with you
It's not just China but India has also been purchasing oil from Russia. 30 years ago, neither of these countries were economically viable enough to allow Russia (then USSR) to burn bridges with the west. However, this is no longer true. That's a change in world order right there.
it should be the arms manufacturers that are the big winners.
Then France has already won;all of the world either buys the F-35 or the French Rafale fighter jet.
USA's selling weapons to Ukraine is as beneficiary as China’s buying discounted oil from Russia. So here two sides are gainer
Ukraine is litteraly defending itself, they can have all the weapons they want! Doesn't matter where they come from
Economist also gains from this war, thru the weapon merchant's money to do this video propaganda 😁
Ukraine hasn't the money to buy these weapons. They're given for free to fight a proxy war for USA. Ukrainians pay with their lives.
The US has never claimed to be neutral- just not directly involved. If you compare China to the US then you're conceding that they're exactly like the US- a party with a vested interest in the conflict
Nonsense... The USA is not selling weapons. It's giving free help.
Bro, we already live in a world where might makes right. The past 20-plus years of failed foreign interventions and no accountability to all parties involved despite the countless civilian deaths, the utter undermining of their regional economic stability, the forced migration of millions because of the prior effects, and the hollowing of living standards via austerity and financial meltdowns in industrialized countries due to the debts these meaningless interventions and occupations have incurred with private institutions should make this obvious to anyone with a brain in their head.
Ikr. Might had always made right in politics, it didn't change, people just got that ridiculous idea from the collapse of USSR.
@@petrorlov2599nobody challenged the us 1990-2014 because the us was too strong. it is like gunboat diplomacy - you do not have to actually use the guns. might did make right after the fall of the ussr.
@@TheDynamicmarket I know, which is why I said that the idea that might DIDN'T make right was a ridiculous one. However some people really started believing it. With works like Francis Fukuyama's "The end of history and the last man".
@@petrorlov2599 Exactly, go look at the history of colonies and people’ll find that right had never been given to them.
WOW VERY DANGEROUS SIR! 😠😠BUT THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗
"The Economist" should rename itself to "The anglo saxon warmonger"
The best way to win wars is not to fight in one.
"To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill" -Sun Tzu
The United States is prepared. Do you think we knew anything about nuclear weapons until we dropped one? Russia should f*ck around and find out!
or join the winer at the last minutes😂
@@VincentAutosyou must mean Italy
you are missing half of the argument. I think you included only half the argument on purpose. The other half, is you don't get to fight one if you invest heavily in military, so others don't want to fight you. Thanks for excluding that.
Wars have no winners, only survivors.
America won her freedom from England
True
yeah not when one side is using drones
Not when it comes to countries that are not in the war
Why cannot USA be the real winner, who made many big weapon deals during the war time and sold the high price oil to Europe 😀
They want to conceal the truth and let China be the target of condemnation. This video also "kindly" reminds Russia of China's gain and potentially drive a wedge between China and Russia. But who has provoked the conflict? Who has financed and provided continuously weapons?
Pretty sure the weapon sales was funded purely by US taxpayers. But yeah the oil hikes were really nice for the US at the expense of the EU.
The key word is “real”.
You see day by day, the US is losing the world it built around it that it's laughable now to think that american can solo handle all the chaos in the world. China is the real winner and it's not all about money everytime.
Oh the US is def. winning. The small investment in Ukraine is paying huge dividends. Best part is no US lives lost.
Leave it to The Economist to find an angle to promote its bizarre worldview.
I think there are sides to this situation this guy is missing. He seems to be making assumptions and cherry picking to support his hypothesis.
Accusing the most peaceful global power in history, one which hasn't been to war in 44 years, of wanting "A world order where might makes right"; how does he actually say this with a straight face? I didn't know the Economist had turned into a comedy club.
Everyone seems to know China so well, yet no one predicted China’s American backed growth would become a threat to America’s hegemony
That threat is far smaller than it’s made out to be.
Thats have been a question since the deng xiapoing era, when that time would come, so it's nothing really new to people paying attention. We just didnt know when would that be. Well here it is now.
If you don’t speak Chinese. You can’t possibly know China well
Nixon gambled on trade with China assuring peace, just as Merkel gambled on trade with Russia. Unfortunately, history has shown them both to have been wrong.
中国没有撞击过美国双子大厦，也没有任何入侵美国的想法，美国人在与中国的贸易中赚了大量财富，所谓威胁只是美国的不自信，对可能会被超越的恐惧
You are telling the story like you made that plan😂
You can blame China if anything in the world is not suitable for you.
Economics or propagandists? Only USA oligarchy regime propaganda 😮
What a great ending lol
China learning fast and improving on American Strategic Ambiguity. “Pro Russian neutrality “
🤣🤣🤣😉😉😉🤭🤭🤭
"Some western governments are skeptical that china can be an honest peace broker"
Many people are even more skeptical that some western government can become an honest peace broker after all the nonsense that is happening in the middle east.
The world is not divided only into east and west. There is always the southern part of the world that certainly can help, the "non-bloc" (also known as the non-aligned) are independent of other influences so why not just get India, Indonesia, or South Africa to broker a peace deal, why it has to be the west? The West does not have to dictate who gets to do what and how this war should end and so is the east. All they should do is to provide a space for both side to negotiate and actively supporting the development toward peace. But if China or anybody else managed to stop the conflict then its great for everybody regardless of how honest they were.
As President Lukashenko once said (well, he did said it so just take it as you will) "A bad peace is better than any war".
Let's keep our eyes peeled on what Sinophobic bots ArabicReja973 , mini-BBC & LastChang has to say about this video.
I can guarantee you it is not relevant, sinophobic and ridiculous.
China are independent Countries who don't want to be a vassal states like mostly Europe small country 😮
Very true
带有明确政治立场的评论。
very one sided. The same can practically be said of the USA.
Yes, USA, such a bad dominant country. They made the world rich, they made the world the most peaceful ever and not even close. They are really bad. Mongols, Roman empire, USSR. Yes, those were much better than the usa. Bring them back plz.
exactly LOL
But the U.S. is a rules-based society that doesn't have inherent interest to start violence. Same for other free democracies. In China, all power is centralized to the national government and there aren't any accountability measures such as voting to keep the government from irrational destructive behavior.
@@jedensnow1084 Really? How many wars have USA and China initiated around the globe??
@@alexy3978not WW2, not Korea, Not Afghanistan. Your not a cooler who thinks they flew their own planes into the towers?
China should also be held accountable for the extinction of the dinosaurs.
😂
End this war soon, so that my investment portfolio improves
I like modern Chinese electronics and machines 🙂
You wanted an upraising in Moscow but end up with one in Paris.
Life sometimes is fair!
Haha! Imagine the coincidence.
Has the Economist ever said anything positive about china in the past 5 years?
Of course not!! .... readers are on the West (mainly)...so says what they want to hear/read....look at the coverage of Irak / Afganistán/ Syrian wars
There is not that much positive about a country that has killed 7 million people gloablly with its lab made virus, puts 10000000 innocent people in camps and commits genocid, and has no tolerance for freedom of speech and is the most suppressive regime in the world.
Economist is a propaganda tool. They arent even subtle about it.
The US has 800+ military bases around the world. China has only 1. It is the US we should be worried about. The US has been at war 93% of the time - 227 out of 245 years - since its founding in 1776. i.e. the U.S. has only been at peace for less than 20 years total since its birth.
History teaches us lessons about how it’s easier to blame others than blame ourselves.
The greatest danger we face today is not coming from China.
Why is the Economist so Afraid China Wins 😂
Because China has always been winning for more than 70 years🤣
Same reason the Athenians weren’t too keen on a Persian victory.
Because China promote cencorship, what they do in their own sphere of interest is their internal affair regardless of its crimes against humanity while the sphere of interest is not static, it can and will expand in the future as their economic sphere of interest grows.
Does this guy really know what China wants or is he guessing?
Shoutout to the seal chilling at 3:34
Frightening but hugely fascinating - thank you. Jane Soole, 79 and I am only just waking up!
There's a whole lot of truth in what David Rennie says. We should be glad that we both are a little older :)
The world will not be a pleasant place to live in if we don't stop what China wants to come
The US has 800+ military bases around the world. China has only 1. It is the US we should be worried about. The US has been at war 93% of the time - 227 out of 245 years - since its founding in 1776. i.e. the U.S. has only been at peace for less than 20 years total since its birth.
History teaches us lessons about how it’s easier to blame others than blame ourselves.
The greatest danger we face today is not coming from China.
Replace “China” with “US” (nope we won’t do that)
Both
I saw the channels you subscribed. Sorry but most of them are American. It seems you are a lying hypocrite.
@@Vatu.You mean both China and the U.S. worked together to blow up the Nordstream pipelines?
how so? US lost billions in aid to Ukraine, now Russia, a nuclear dictatorial state is about to become a vassal state of China, and it looks more unstable than ever. I would say US is better off without the war
one side of the story, u have no courage to report the story of China.
I'd like to hear David and Niall Ferguson talk.
want more of this, thank you!
What Fiction? This is about as strange as i gets, the economist ignoring the total collapse of China's economy?
no one wins and everyone loses for the sake of these people it’s not worth trying
bro slept in history class politicians the rich elite are always the winners in war
Very interesting!
Yes 👍
Chinese Civilization will definitely change the previous western pirate culture and their “rules based international order”, like “winner takes all”, and let all countries share fairly from world safety and prosperity.
It sure will be interesting if the US stops providing security for maritime transport.
As a European I had become rather fond of bananas.
Back to regional markets & regional powers I guess.
At least Norway & Ukraine have natural gas (maybe Europe will scrape through after all).
@@JamesC785 USA doesn’t want to see any newly established relationship between Russia and EU, especially Russian gas/oil pipelines to EU.
@@kshen7485 Don't be silly - the EU would not be interested in russian gas/oil anyway, not with russia in its present form.
Ukraine becoming a part of the EU will change quite a few things anyway - they'll become the powerhouse of Europe.
The US would be more than happy for the EU becoming more independent anyway, making for a more useful partnership (it's about time the EU came of age & started pulling its weight).
@@JamesC785 Anyway, Asian countries are very lucky, they have been not involved into those wars between the pirates since decades and gradually getting more shares of world economy pie, which was mostly possessed by the west before.
The fact that Vietnam, a country that proclaims itself as communist has better relationships with the US than with its communist neighbor is really telling...
China never wage this war.
Very interesting
I don't know. I mean, the massive increase in militray spending by Japan surely counterbalances some of these arguments?
Welcome to the multipolar world as it was always been. It's just a few decades of the cold war in which it was two powers, however majority of history it was a multipolar world.
It's because those times were much more terrible than it was with just two big bullies. The multipolar world of the past reaks with war, colonialism, slavery, and with human rights violations that were natural everyday things. Those things obviously still happen today, but at least during the Cold War, humanity suffered "less" thanks to the fear of world war.
Pakistan is not in list so become happy for what you dumb?
The US is not coming outta this too badly either
are you kidding me? Your NATO partners are sick of you as USA is draging us to all their PROXY conflicts worldwide? Even Taiwan? Are u kidding me ?
They are. They have pushed Russian to China's lap. This was a gigantic geopolitical disaster for the Us
David Rennis is the best! I love Drum Tower!
The ruble falls like a stone.
None of this based on fact, just opinion. Terrible report to gobble up some views. The basis of American “journalism” these days.
I’m Chinese, I only know Chinese don’t like war, that is true.
This.. 😳
Enough with China …
After making this video, this guy and The Economist will undoubtedly get money from their sugar daddy. We all know that The Economist only tells you what their daddy wanna you to know~
@sheng- yes , precisely, betraying his conscience!
is he broke, badly in need of monies?
china is conducting simple geopolitics, but the tone of this video is very antgonistic trying to paint china as a boogeyman and that the world is doomed, let's also talk about America's crimes against humanity
Hot take
Not simple geopolitics. Subtle covert geopolitics that would never be accepted had people known. They simply do it too subtly for the world to wake up yet. It will come one day
@@michaelgothenburg364Many governments see exactly what the Americans are about, sadly many of them are afraid of a fragile country that can barely supply Ukraine without drawdowns, has to "borrow Artillery shells" as they cannot produce a 10th of what is needed, this BTW is around 20% of "weak russias capacity" lol. This conflict has come at a unimaginable price for 🇺🇦, 8-10 million citizens fled, a few million were already working in Europe, they have 1/9th of Russia's population, They have mobilised 29 times in various regions, "I did not say they mobiled 29 times nationally, 🇷🇺 has mobilised once, Ukraine is entirely dependent on mainly America for its government to function, weapons and ISR. Russia produces weapons dispite being the most santioned nation in history, it also has multiple partners it can access weaponry from, they lean heavily on the Chinese for revenue however it has other markets it still receives over 50% of its revenue from including Euopre, America will most likely have a new president next yr, despite what MSM is saying Putin is not going anywhere and will only concede power to his successor "Medvedev's son" when he dies of natural causes or his health requires it, Russia shows great restraint towards Ukraine in terms of hitting civilian targets "conflicts always sadly have civilians being hit no matter how precise you try to be", it could easily obliterate Ukraine if it chooses to "nuclear weapons excluded" they themselves know this could easily escalate to a world war if they do this, same as mobilising 5 million troops could have the same effect, Putin hate him or love him is a master of chess so to speak, keeping a conflict confined to one nation suits russia, america, and europe, sadly I have a feeling when Europe wakes up to the fact they are pawns in a chess game it will be to late for them...not a popular opinion I know but come at me bots 😀 😉 😄
@@michaelgothenburg364Apparently not subtle enough as everyone is talking about it. If no one knows about it how would you be talking about it?
@@joaovoador05 Because I have been working with them for over 25 years and know how they think. The Chinese government understood that democracy's greatest weakness is that it cannot act without public support a very long time ago
Great video
when I hear a statement like 'China doesn't want to be friends with a loser' it tells me this guy knows nothing about Chinese politics.
Do you mean it’s the opposite so China’ can exploit the week optimally
When i hear another statement that China will be benefit of Ukraine post war rebuild, its also tell me he knows nothing about world politics too.
This is nonsense. It's like seeing Russian and Chinese analysts talking about the US being the biggest beneficiary of this conflict all the time these days.
If Russia loses the war and China's economy collapses, the US will be the benefactor as will all people wishing to be free.
Clue us in. When did countries not have to "accommodate" the Great Powers?
I hope so.
US government believes in, might makes right. What else are the 800 plus military bases around the world meant for if not to intimidate.
Thank you for telling this to the world. Love from Asia.
totally agree
The US has 800+ military bases around the world. China has only 1. It is the US we should be worried about. The US has been at war 93% of the time - 227 out of 245 years - since its founding in 1776. i.e. the U.S. has only been at peace for less than 20 years total since its birth.
History teaches us lessons about how it’s easier to blame others than blame ourselves.
The greatest danger we face today is not coming from China.
"Might does make right." Sounds like a slogan for the US Military Industrial Complex.
I am Chinese and I am happy to see my country make such astute decisions. You should not feel that making decisions is cruel. This is what you call geopolitics. Why do NATO and the United States always consider themselves as natural and just parties? Fundamentalism?
The Chinese government is making the same mistake as Russia. It has already shown its incompetence. I see no reason why the oppressed Chinese people have any reason to rejoice at any win by its government. Xi has made himself emperor, indicating he has the same ambition as Putin, and will suffer the same fate.
They call evil anyone who doesn’t play by their rules
@@ireneseverova2369 The rules server a purpose. A failure to play by the rules, is a mark of the thief, the bully, the blackmailer, the murderer, the dictator, and the evil.
Sorry to see a guy under ccp power 😞
I understandt EU's concerns about Ukraine but what about Iraq and Afghanistan, they suffered the same fate too.
Previous wrongs don’t justify current wrongs.
By that standard, all evil would be justified.
@@miguelservetus9534 will the evil by Israel against Palestine be justified? It's a current "wrong".
@@miguelservetus9534 your "that standard" is double- standard.
@@zachu1587 my point is that one evil does not justify another. That never ends. Each side says’Look at what they did.’ Then the fighting and death never end.
@@zachu1587 US and the Wests past evil does not justify Putin’s evil .
By your standard, where does it end?
Yes
nice
You benefit from NOT getting involved in wars. What’s wrong with that? 😂
None of these are China's fault. China just be China, trading with everyone peacefully. China is not a party in the Ukraine conflict. Nato and Russia are.
Is brutal crackdowns, crimes against humanity and censorship to hide the rush really peaceful?
@@michaelgothenburg364Facts: China has not bombed any countries for the past forty years. Meanwhile, US/Nato are involved in wars and conflicts that killed millions and caused millions more in refugees during the same period. Of course, you're not aware of this because you have been brainwashed by western mainstream media lies.
China bully india but overall they're well country doesn't hypocrite like west atleast
@3:35 why are there Turkish flags? What’s that about?
China is an importer of oil and food, and the war has led to price increases. Then, the United States is an exporter of oil and food
This guy sounds like he's fighting the war with China. Just know that there are a lot of people and countries who don't want any wars, proxy wars or warmongers. Everyone can be a winner without wars.
World of the US has been the most brutal. This report is like a brutal fearing from future justice ⚖️ or end of its ruling.
They dont mention how the usa never paid for iraq and all its invasions
Chess, a game of war. If this... then that...
How is India allying with the US beneficial for China? The Economist is as unprofessional as always...
im not sure, can't see China gain anything from the war, yet, but obviously India gain more, so ignoring the basic fact is your brilliant analysis?
You are thinking too short term. Look long term. Everything China does is long term
Well, economist is biased towards US and its allies, and against China & its kind. Not surprised there
Those who can't think long term and strategically are literally geopolitically illiterate. All short term thinking requires no thinking because all you have to do is to follow the herd.
@@michaelgothenburg364 China likes to PRETEND they have perfect long term vision. Problem is they don't. They owe basically everything they have achieved to the US. Now that the US is divorcing them they have nothing.
better use you analytical skills to save the UK sir
He is trying to save the uk, you just don't understand
Most underrated comment lol
Don’t buy the propaganda people
intresting😮
if China is so smart, then, we need to learn from the best rather berate others! US and Canadian politician, Learn from them!
Cannot do. The biggest characteristic of democracies is that their politicians mirror the populace. Like people like thugs.
Justa a simple question. Do you think China would want to see a defeated Rusia and a more hegemonic West turning upon China to make it squeeze like Russia? I think not at all. If Russia is defeated then next in line is China. Therefore, China would want to see the West exhausted and keep it busy dealing with Russia. A weakened Russia results in stronger US hegemony which is not favorable to China and the global South which is tired of the bully.
What did usa pay for iraq? Libya? Yemen? Afghanistan?
Hes talking so much without actually saying anything
Advance weapons and Russia in the same sentence , that made me chuckle 😅😅
I bet you were positively laughing your socks off at the turmoil created when Russia helped install Trump as President of USA
Remember how Usa lost to rebels wearing sandals in Afghanistan?😂
@@shubankersharma4013
They didn't loose, they left voluntarily after controlling the country and installing a new government 20 years prior.
@@shubankersharma4013 Yes the Afghan National Army. I hope this brave people get a new home in India. And teach Indians the virtues of Islam. But I have to admit some Indian cultural things are unique - like slapping children on the streets.
@@PakalChicxulub Russian tactics are very advanced. Like stuffing a tank with explosives. Fixing the gas pedal and jumping out of the driving thank. Your way of thinking and solving problems is probably alike because great minds think alike
Interesting analysis by Mr. Remnick. But does he factor in the China'(and Russia's for that matter) impending demographic collapse? India, along with the US(mostly but not entirely due to foreign emigration.
Also- this may or may not be Mr. Remnick's completely candid analysis, as in Xi's China, journalists, and in this case, foreign ones are required to spin any global event as one in which China was in the right all along. The Ecornomist must cater to Chinese demands of glorification of the dear leader(not to be confused with the North Korean Dear Leader, who was better than Tiger Woods in the game of golf!😊
Overall, everything Mr. Remnick says is factually accurate and I mostly agree with him. Particularly the part regarding to whom Mr. Putin will be able to export energy to. Simply look at all of the pipelines being built in Russia. I would be very much interested in Mr Remnick's analysis of the whole near coup, that was only settled by phone calls to Aleksander Lukashenko.
epic sound effects, as always with this kind of videos lol, bravo
cold calculate... sounds as though he believes winning can only comes through 'cold calculation'! how about 'win-win cooperation'?
That'd be socialism, the real evil here, not the war mongering nations
prejudice as always
china always win. china win twice. which is win-win😀😀
Judge the enemy on future prediction based on your own evil past. The arrogance and lack of self-aware warmongering is wild!
So who is sellimg military to Ukrainr qnd who benfits from that???
1. Biggest winner is US military industry, Energy industry.
2. Biggest loser is Ukraine next Russia, next EU and US tax payer.
3. China has a share of gain and loss. Loss being affected not to do business directly with a sanctioned Russia. Gain would be indirect influencing.
Espectacular explanatory video. Well done, David Rennie !!
I don’t think that was what Mr. Putin intended at all….
Well they are looking at greater North Machuria with interests,
This dude forgot to mention global de-dollarization. Many countries are replacing dollar with Yuan