Shotgun vs Drone Airframe - UAV Torture Test by Aerial Sports League

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лис 2024
  • On this Episode, Marque Cornblatt and the team puts the airframe prototype through a torture test. The airframe will face flying through fire and glass windows, free-fall drops from hundreds of feet and will even face down a 12 gauge shotgun loaded with heavy dove ammo. Does this drone airframe have what it takes to survive?

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,9 тис.

  • @ashes180-x7d
    @ashes180-x7d 9 років тому +153

    This drone is indestructible as long you replace any destroyed parts.

  • @kidddogbites
    @kidddogbites 5 місяців тому +14

    Well... This aged well. dude was a decade ahead of the curve.

    • @shinji1264
      @shinji1264 Місяць тому

      Absolutely insane.

    • @fascistalien
      @fascistalien Місяць тому +2

      You dont remember the drones in cod bo2??? (2025 war is gonna be dominated by drones) And they werent wrong

    • @kidddogbites
      @kidddogbites Місяць тому

      @fascistalien to be honest i was always more of a battlefield player

  • @VeryBeowulf
    @VeryBeowulf 8 років тому +12

    You should probably do a test with a few different types of ammo, just to really see how much abuse it can handle. And, because shooting drones is fun.

  • @jeremyc.6900
    @jeremyc.6900 7 років тому +7

    A drone like that could save countless lives in a search and rescue scenario, or in a military application. Nice work, gentleman!

  • @kungpow8062
    @kungpow8062 9 років тому +111

    "So Bill what did you major for in college?"
    "Oh uh shooting shotguns at drones, I'm actually a professional at what I do."

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  9 років тому +20

      Nathan Caggiano The major you reference is Mechanical engineering, with an emphasis on materials research for aerospace.

    • @zezimasxbad
      @zezimasxbad 9 років тому +6

      Game of Drones UA-cam gold.

    • @tdscoop
      @tdscoop 2 місяці тому

      That’s an invaluable skill in todays world

  • @nsfarm4610
    @nsfarm4610 9 років тому +132

    My car is indestructible at all like your drone. I crashed it driving 70 m/h, changed the broken front and a new engine, the car is as new as its get. Today I tried to shoot it with a 85 mm cannon, Ha only the half of the car went bust, so I changed that with new parts we bought.... Now its working again indestructible like you drone..

  • @HugeVictor
    @HugeVictor 10 років тому +16

    I should mention that shotgun experiment is comparable to shooting at a car's hood, replacing the damaged components in the engine bay and then concluding the car itself is indestructible.

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому +5

      Thanks for the comments. To be fair, if you consider the scale of your comparison in terms of mass/speed/ and other forces of ballistics, it's more akin to shooting a car hood with an A10 Warthog and being able to drive away with minor repairs. And that would be the world's most indestructible car. Thanks for watching and share the links.

    • @Jabbasaur
      @Jabbasaur 10 років тому

      Nobody wants to go find a drone so they can perform these minor repairs though, especially not if there's a nutter with a shotgun lurking somewhere nearby.
      Surely this will end up giving a lot of drones to the enemy that they can then perform "minor repairs" on, replace the transmitter crystal and then use against you?

    • @yumpaa
      @yumpaa 10 років тому

      Marque Cornblatt Prod. how much does that drone you are using cost roughly? and where could i buy one?

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому

      yumpaa You can purchase our airframe here:
      www.gameofdrones.biz
      Thx!

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому +1

      Toby Squibb This video is a demonstration of the airframe's toughness, not a suggestion of a battle tactic. Thanks for the comments and share the links with your buddies.

  • @edthegoomba
    @edthegoomba 9 років тому +3

    Why are people hitting dislike so much? He fixed that thing in 2 seconds with easy to carry spare parts, definitely a tough drone.

  • @cnote678
    @cnote678 10 років тому +9

    This was totally awesome. Thank you for teaching me how to effectively hunt small drones!

  • @Mikeanglo
    @Mikeanglo 10 років тому +16

    This is why surface-to-air missiles should be legal and commercially available at Walmart.

    • @tamasbartha95
      @tamasbartha95 10 років тому +1

      lol

    • @DKDuchy
      @DKDuchy 10 років тому +5

      they are, but only around july 4th;D

  • @fixinggrace
    @fixinggrace 9 років тому +10

    Shooting that pistol gripped shotgun like that is good way to end up with your jaw wired shut.

    • @fixinggrace
      @fixinggrace 9 років тому +1

      Doesn't matter if it's a .410, there are butt stocks for a reason. Pistol grips are for firing from the hip, like breaching a door or close in fighting. By using that shotgun that way, you're setting an example of something that's very unsafe.

    • @fixinggrace
      @fixinggrace 9 років тому +2

      +Justin Westbrook your jaw, not mine

    • @fixinggrace
      @fixinggrace 8 років тому +1

      Justin, when name calling starts, the discussion ends. I'm going to block you. This person is another reason why trying to have a meaningful on UA-cam is pointless. Too many keyboard warriors here.

    • @Wind1000100
      @Wind1000100 8 років тому +2

      +Walter Grace Keyboard Warriors shouldn't be people who can use dumb insults. They should be people who know how to speak correctly and have a proper, civilised argument.
      That's what it should mean; not necessarily what it does. :)

    • @fixinggrace
      @fixinggrace 8 років тому +1

      Agreed

  • @TheNico9696
    @TheNico9696 8 років тому +16

    shooting it with birdshot won't do much. Shoot it with buck shot next time.

    • @MPdude237
      @MPdude237 5 років тому

      Buckshot would be really tricky to land unless you are using a large bore shotgun with a crap ton of #4 buckshot or something.

    • @migyverman
      @migyverman 2 роки тому +1

      A steel BB load would take it down with a shotgun.

  • @muhammadsteinberg
    @muhammadsteinberg 9 років тому +30

    Not really understanding your definition of indestructible. Each time you did something it brought the craft down and you had to repair it before the next flight. Repairable yes. Indestructible, absolutely not!

    • @DecepticonLeader
      @DecepticonLeader 8 років тому +1

      +Muhammad Steinberg
      Indeed. This thing isn't indestructible at all. He should have used a reinforced steel frame to begin with.

    • @Tatusiek_1
      @Tatusiek_1 8 років тому

      +ChaosManticore how about titanium frame stronger and lighter but more expensive :/

    • @DecepticonLeader
      @DecepticonLeader 8 років тому

      eggrollsoupnova2000
      Certainly. But unless they want to spend a lot of extra money on this prototype, I doubt it would be a good idea. Even if you make the frame more durable, the rest of the craft has weaknesses.

  • @jdessell
    @jdessell 9 років тому +4

    I'm interested in which load you used in the shotgun. Low-brass birdshot? Im sure 00 buck would have had you sweeping up that drone with a dustpan.

  • @justinwoolee
    @justinwoolee 10 років тому +25

    You have the 2nd to protect the 4th and other Amendments. And to this Orwellian salesmen I say, teach your "professional" how to aim so he can actually hit it the second time.

    • @stripedassape8148
      @stripedassape8148 9 місяців тому

      To be fair that's the wrong kind of shotgun and ammo for the job, but he wasnt really trying to destroy it✌

  • @quietthomas
    @quietthomas 8 років тому +12

    Yep, everything is indestructible if you have a bunch of replacement parts on hand.

    • @felixs9722
      @felixs9722 8 років тому +1

      +quietthomas its about the frame, which did sortof get wrecked by the first shotgun hit

    • @lilianwatts7030
      @lilianwatts7030 4 роки тому

      @quietthomas @felix is right,it is about the frame

  • @darinsullaphen4683
    @darinsullaphen4683 10 років тому +4

    The material technology is amazing. Certainly a product fr the future. Congratulations to the manufacturers and testers. Hopefully these will be made affordable for all in the near future. Great work guys!

  • @Bucking_Fastard
    @Bucking_Fastard 10 років тому +25

    Dump it into the water and we'll see, how undestructible it is.

    • @williamespejo1259
      @williamespejo1259 10 років тому

      Haha gomod one

    • @harveyjepps1698
      @harveyjepps1698 10 років тому

      They're testing the airframe,not the internals.. Your logic is that plastic can't withstand water? Hmmm.

    • @MrOvertSandStorm
      @MrOvertSandStorm 9 років тому +3

      If you just sprayed the motors and electronics with corrosion-x then it would be completely fine and would fly out of the water again even when totally submerged :P

    • @MrChaosflying
      @MrChaosflying 9 років тому +3

      MrOvertSandStorm Well someone has watched some flite test lol!

    • @MrOvertSandStorm
      @MrOvertSandStorm 9 років тому +2

      MrChaosflying haha yes! love a bit of flite test! Peter and his little tricks ;)

  • @thatyoda
    @thatyoda 11 років тому +16

    my personal zombie boomstick lol

  • @petersmythe6462
    @petersmythe6462 8 років тому +1

    @ the fire test:
    One thing about fire is that it's essentially 900 Celsius air. That means it's about 1/4th the density of room temperature air. This means that flying a drone (or any aerodynamic vehicle really) through fire will cause sudden loss of lift. Come to think of it, flamethrowers may be an interesting way to fight drones, as if they don't cook them, they will at least knock them out of the air, and quite likely cook off their magazines or detonate their explosives if they're meant as fighters, bombers, or kamikazes.

  • @KickRocksClowns
    @KickRocksClowns 9 років тому +50

    Your shotgun has a pistol grip and is painted like a toy. Yes, very professional...

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  9 років тому +25

      Westin S Yes, you are correct. The shotgun does have a pistol grip, it is painted, and I am a professional. Thanks for sharing your keen observations. Don't forget to share the clip with your buddies.

    • @SamNetworkYT
      @SamNetworkYT 9 років тому +7

      +Westin S Ohhh!!! That sarcasm backfired!

    • @KickRocksClowns
      @KickRocksClowns 9 років тому +7

      +✈ SamNetwork ✈ lol SICK burn! Send that sad excuse for a shotgun back to Borderlands or sell it to that gang from Chappie and get a Benelli! You know, like a real professional ; )

    • @dodgydave1053
      @dodgydave1053 9 років тому +9

      +Westin S Someone's butt is hurting...

    • @deepsouthredneck1
      @deepsouthredneck1 8 років тому +2

      +Westin S I've been shooting guns competitively since 7 and that made me cringe lol.

  • @robdee7520
    @robdee7520 10 років тому +1

    Dude, if you haven't pitched this design to the Military, what are you waiting for. This thing is awesome.

  • @mattholmes06
    @mattholmes06 9 років тому +41

    the showtgun clearly broke it... you had to swap out parts... thats useless in the field.

    • @mattholmes06
      @mattholmes06 9 років тому +8

      ***** my car tire isnt claiming to be to indestructible..

    • @ablutophile
      @ablutophile 9 років тому +7

      ***** Matt didn't claim that it was destroyed, but that it was broken, as it was, and had to be repaired. By your definition destroyed means "unable to fly". The drone was clearly unable to fly after being shot. He had a valid point so tone down the arrogance.

    • @Lofi.z34
      @Lofi.z34 9 років тому

      +Fuck You Google "Destroyed" means broken beyond repair. Key words: beyond repair.

    • @ablutophile
      @ablutophile 9 років тому +1

      SwaffyX
      I completely agree, notice I was reiterating Andy's definition (after pointing out that Matt never claimed it was destroyed, just broken) in order to highlight that he shouldn't be such a smart-ass when he's contradicting himself.

    • @isenhertor
      @isenhertor 9 років тому +1

      +Andy Wilderness wow.... so rude...

  • @kevind3185
    @kevind3185 2 роки тому +1

    I'm thinking if hit with a 3" High Brass #4 buckshot with a tight choke in a shotgun that can be shouldered there might have been some parts flying.

  • @MarqueCornblatt
    @MarqueCornblatt  11 років тому +13

    Shotgun vs Drone
    The ultimate UAV toture test.
    Share the link!

    • @MrDEADCELL1
      @MrDEADCELL1 11 років тому

      this is my video i have watched from you.
      but do you have other videos more about this drone.
      about its structural make up and electronics.
      have you built this your self or has it been modified??
      thank for the video.

    • @heirofaniu
      @heirofaniu 9 років тому +1

      Now hit it with double ought buck. That should do her.

    • @jadonsharp7345
      @jadonsharp7345 9 років тому

      Game of Drones you should take tons of little drones like this amzn.to/1HQDIte
      then shoot them all out of the sky or take them out with the supper drone

    • @frankthetank6173
      @frankthetank6173 9 років тому

      Game of Drones was that buckshot or birdshot in the shotgun?

    • @nathanbonde9347
      @nathanbonde9347 9 років тому

      It was probably target loads. Maybe #8shot

  • @BJETNT
    @BJETNT 2 роки тому +1

    That was pretty cool. I wouldn't have thought it would have taken a shotgun blast that easily especially once it got knocked out of the air and then just takes off again.

  • @bulbinking
    @bulbinking 10 років тому +11

    Nice job using a shotgun without a proper chock.
    If it can't be used for skeet shooting obviously it won't be good for shooting down a drone. Also the shot load plays a big role.
    Sorry, but against a proper shotgun it would be destroyed.

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому +4

      Thanks for the comments. As you can see, I also know a little about guns, and this shotty in particular. I find it amusing how the people who miss the point of this airframe test are always people who insist there is a bigger gun or better ammo load. The point is that this airframe can not be destroyed by any means that a drone would likely encounter. Most airframeswould have been destroyed in the first 15 seconds of this clip. My airframe has been surviving this abuse for over 3 years. Thx again and share the links!
      Guns & Gardens Ep. 13: Mossberg 500 Ballistic Test

    • @bulbinking
      @bulbinking 10 років тому +2

      Marque Cornblatt Prod.
      I thought the purpose of the test would be to see if the drone could withstand being shot at be angry Americans who don't want drones over their head.
      My apologies if that wasn't the point of shooting at it with a shotgun, and thank you for admitting you didn't REALLY try shooting it down with a shotgun designed for shooting things from the air.

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому +3

      bulbinking The purpose of the entire video is to show how reliable our airframe is against damage and abuse - well beyond what would be expected while flying a drone. The gun in this video is being used as a tool for testing, not as an object of lust. Why doesn't anyone ever complain about the quality of the window panes we used in our testing?

    • @bulbinking
      @bulbinking 10 років тому +1

      Marque Cornblatt Prod.
      Oh believe me, that was next on my list of obnoxious critiques! ;)

    • @dylansmith2236
      @dylansmith2236 10 років тому

      bulbinking Yeah us Americans don't want drones flying over us. Watching our every move and seeing if we step out of line.

  • @Bellinghamster
    @Bellinghamster 10 років тому +2

    This drone is astounding. It was heartbreaking watching it being abused but it is remarkable to see how durable it is. Great Video!

    • @wesleyp3024
      @wesleyp3024 2 роки тому

      not sure the heart breaking part is needed. its just a chunk of metal an plastic. not like its alive.

  • @UNTBC
    @UNTBC 11 років тому +8

    "trained profession", LOL. What do you do for a living LMAO!

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  11 років тому

      Have you seen any of my earlier videos? That should answer your questions...

    • @UNTBC
      @UNTBC 11 років тому

      Marque Cornblatt Prod.
      Just 3 of the more recient, why? Have watched any of my videos? You could have left a link to the video(s) you are referring to, instead of asking a redundant question.

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  11 років тому +5

      Collegiate Match Fishing No, I prefer my viewers to be informed about my work before criticizing it. I also expect them to do their own research instead of expecting me to spoon-feed it to them. However, I suppose THIS link would be sufficient to answer your original question. Thanks for watching and don't forget to share the links with your pals.
      ua-cam.com/video/wtq3tRB5uBk/v-deo.html

    • @UNTBC
      @UNTBC 11 років тому +3

      Marque Cornblatt Prod.
      So you need to build weapons platforms to qualify to shoot down quadcopters, lol? Hell, there's a peta video where some hunters shot down their quad spying on them, I guess they weren't qualified to do that, better send them a courtesy note explaining they violated professional criteria, LMAO! Still got a laugh at out your videos, thanks for sharing.

  • @shield400
    @shield400 11 років тому +1

    This awesome quad would make the absolute ultimate Christmas gift!

  • @Meatrocket6500
    @Meatrocket6500 8 років тому +3

    anything is indestructible.... if you keep replacing the parts

  • @xylevan
    @xylevan 8 років тому +1

    So many people missing the concept of the video. Yes the quad copter was damaged but was the airframe? At which point of the video did the airframe break?

  • @elliottbanks6882
    @elliottbanks6882 8 років тому +4

    He shoots it with a shot gun and the drone is disabled, He fixes it and he says nothing is wrong with it. That's like me totaling my car and fixing it and saying nothing is wrong with it. However the frame is sturdy but if your going to shoot it with a gun and say nothing is wrong with it...............

  • @1xm_mx1
    @1xm_mx1 5 місяців тому +1

    The shot size is probably too small to damage the drone body, or completely missed it.

  • @nextstorming3908
    @nextstorming3908 8 років тому +3

    Indestructible my ass, you just replace the parts

  • @jagmcool2
    @jagmcool2 10 років тому +1

    Thats like blowing up a computer monitor and being like "we replaced the monitor, but the keyboard was perfectly fine!"

  • @FungusMossGnosis
    @FungusMossGnosis 8 років тому +5

    Send it to the Finnish dude at the Hydraulic Press Channel... he will deal with it.

  • @guilmon-6508
    @guilmon-6508 7 років тому +1

    The two coolest things put together in one video!

  • @Cheeseoverdose
    @Cheeseoverdose 9 років тому +131

    shame on you. a starving child in africa could have eaten that drone

    • @Caver461
      @Caver461 9 років тому +19

      It would never have got as far as the child, it would have been embezzled and resold by a ruthless government official - corruption in those countries is out of control.

    • @najidsufyan9127
      @najidsufyan9127 9 років тому +1

      shame on you,kids in florida could have bite off that drone

    • @Cheeseoverdose
      @Cheeseoverdose 9 років тому +1

      oh you're turkish. Probably jew jokes then, huh.

    • @Cheeseoverdose
      @Cheeseoverdose 9 років тому +2

      Would it be ok for me to make fun of your english? You can make fun of my turkish. I don't even know the first word.

    • @Cheeseoverdose
      @Cheeseoverdose 9 років тому +2

      Have you thought about donating to charities that help children in africa? I bet you haven't.

  • @MarqueCornblatt
    @MarqueCornblatt  11 років тому +2

    We design and make one aspect - the airframe - it is indestructible by any measures we subjected upon it and no amount of damage has effected it's functionality. All the other components (motors, electronics, etc..) are not my design or manufacture. They may or may not break (they usually don't). Defining this any more clearly should not be needed. Have you watched our earlier videos where we build the prototype? That may help clarify your questions...

  • @pbutok
    @pbutok 10 років тому +10

    can you stop calling it a drone its a QUADCOPTER or at least UAV not a drone

    • @HugeVictor
      @HugeVictor 10 років тому +6

      I was foaming at the mouth thinking the same thing. I'm so tired of people calling multirotors drones...

    • @FHFYProductions
      @FHFYProductions 10 років тому

      What is the difference between a drone and a quadcopter?

    • @HiThereou812
      @HiThereou812 10 років тому +1

      Alexei Lipov spelling ? Drone today seems to cover anything that can be flown remotely..

    • @mattd6931
      @mattd6931 10 років тому

      Definition of "Drone" from the dictionary: 'a remote-controlled pilotless aircraft or missile.'

    • @bizmarkie507
      @bizmarkie507 10 років тому

      because average joe blow doesn't know what UAV means. there's worse problems in the world than this.

  • @Wheelabarraback
    @Wheelabarraback 8 років тому

    I am a trained professional Drone killer so I should be right to try that at home. Well done with the proto type and yes shoot it with a cannon and it will fall down but that's a very impressive demo that I doubt any other drone will withstand .

  • @JontoDickens
    @JontoDickens 10 років тому +4

    So if you guys make a helmet out of your drone plastic you could shoot yourself in the face with that shotgun and you would be totally fine.... That's a video I'd definitely watch!

    • @HTobias
      @HTobias 10 років тому

      Well done sir!

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому +4

      You have it backwards. The helmets that you refer to already exist and are in use. We took military-proven ballistic materials (ie. bulletproof plastic) and re-purpose the tech for our airframes. Thx for watching and share the links!

    • @JontoDickens
      @JontoDickens 10 років тому

      So what i said is still true? I don't know what you mean backwards as it's a vice versa statement. I only typed it one way round for the sake of efficiency. But Anyway, It's still true right?

    • @oadamo
      @oadamo 10 років тому

      Marque Cornblatt Prod.
      bulletproof plastic, bullshit.

  • @20alphabet
    @20alphabet 11 років тому +1

    Bird shot with no choke can be like a half dozen guys shooting BB guns at it, depending on the range. Next time try 00 Buck at the same range... or maybe a slung-buck round. Hey, just trying to help.

  • @LandersWorkshop
    @LandersWorkshop 9 років тому +3

    3:28. Now try doing it over concrete / asphalt!

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  9 років тому

      Watch Ryder Really...? That is your take-away from this video, that somehow the tests weren't tough enough? How about this video, where all we do is hit it with a bat and smash the airframe into concrete as hard as we can...
      ua-cam.com/video/r7Eppotfq80/v-deo.html

    • @LandersWorkshop
      @LandersWorkshop 9 років тому

      LOL.
      I seem to ruffled your feathers a bit there. LOL.
      Don't be so sensitive, I saw your other videos but for that test there was no concrete drop.
      You know what you have to do...

    • @GameofdronesBiz
      @GameofdronesBiz 9 років тому +2

      Watch Ryder Not ruffled, but I answer these type of comments a lot. The impact of a freefall onto pavement is a decent test, but flying at full speed into walls/windows is actually a much better test, since the impact at full speed is so much greater than the impact from freefall. The drone can't even reach terminal velocity, since there is too much drag and not enough height. But thanks for the comments and share the links!

  • @rokag3332
    @rokag3332 8 місяців тому

    There is something simple to block a drone; nylon wires without weight they are going to wrap around the prop that will make the balance unsustainable
    Also if you take drone loaded with heavy ammunition they are not very "agile" due to the inertia
    a version of nylon or kevlar wire with glued sand could potentially damage the props.
    The goal is to make the drone inoperative and fell on the ground intact or not is not the problem

  • @ian1231100
    @ian1231100 10 років тому +6

    You forgot one thing : WATER

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому +2

      Nope. We got that covered here:
      Drone Torture Test #3: Water Cannons and Splashdowns

    • @ian1231100
      @ian1231100 10 років тому

      Guess I spoke too soon then... can you make it amphibian? :D

  • @Justinjohnsonrocks
    @Justinjohnsonrocks 8 років тому +2

    This dude sounds like every Ford owner "yeah it works fine if you replace everything on it"

  • @8Trego8
    @8Trego8 10 років тому +2

    Anything will be fine if you just fuck it up then replace the broken parts...

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому +1

      Not true. Most airframes cannot be repaired after you shoot it. They will be a total loss. Our airframe is practically unscathed. Parts are just parts.

    • @falloutbr
      @falloutbr 10 років тому

      Isn't the airframe a part itself?Marque Cornblatt Prod.

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому +2

      falloutbr I'm not sure what your getting at.... We make airframes. Those airframe survived our tests. I'm sorry if you think this video is trying to prove something else. Thanks for watching!

  • @jeremiahmatousek6519
    @jeremiahmatousek6519 8 років тому

    A note to anyone wanting to shoot random drones: in the usa its highly illegal and can land you up to 20 years of fedral prison because uas(drone) counts as a private aircraft.

  • @Chris_t0
    @Chris_t0 8 років тому +8

    massive kickstarter scam

  • @innamordo
    @innamordo 10 років тому +1

    this is as much a testament to GoPro cameras as it is to the drone!

  • @ItsKanches
    @ItsKanches 9 років тому +6

    only a trained professional should ever shoot at a drone? I dont get whats so dangerous about it, its probably safer then skeet shooting which is a national pasttime O.o

    • @shmeet
      @shmeet 9 років тому +7

      KnucklesProtector
      What exactly is illegal?

    • @chrisgarza7110
      @chrisgarza7110 9 років тому

      Yea. There are designated places to shoot handguns. It's just a disclaimer guys jeez

    • @MobileMasterTech
      @MobileMasterTech 9 років тому

      Chris Garza

    • @dstuart76
      @dstuart76 9 років тому +2

      shmeet There is nothing illegal at all.....at least if you live in the United States. I build RC devices and shoot them skeet style for target practice all the time. In fact, you can target shoot just about anything non living as long as you own it.

    • @shmeet
      @shmeet 9 років тому

      ***** I didn't say it was illegal.

  • @JaredReabow
    @JaredReabow 10 років тому

    hey guyz, i have 2 modifications i would suggest you make for better performance.
    firstly, the arms should be thinner or have flow holes to reduce power loss, seconly, try give the arms a banana bend upwards so the bottom of the arm on the end is above the top of the canter body, this will increase stability and also give slower and more controlled falls as the copter will remain upright in a fall and the props will spin adding drag.

  • @MarqueCornblatt
    @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому +14

    Theyor sale now via Kickstarter
    www.kickstarter.com/projects/1484147624/worlds-toughest-action-sports-airframe-by-game-of

    • @Zylith_
      @Zylith_ 10 років тому +2

      will there be a manual on the site of all the parts you guys use to build one? and a step by step tutorial (just in manual not in video), because i'm just 16 and don't really know how to build such things. but would really really want one of these =D. so if i got the air frame i still wouldn't know "How to". will this be available?

    • @bonicr1
      @bonicr1 10 років тому

      I don't have an account on kickstarter but I'll make one and buy if you answer some of these questions.
      I noticed the $625 is an RTF without radio/battery. Does this have the APM 2.6 or 2.5 on there that's featured in this video?
      Is that included in the $325 kit?

    • @Andrei-xi5tu
      @Andrei-xi5tu 10 років тому +6

      do u know it's illegal to steal Chuck Norris' personal vehicle?

    • @victorianspectre7748
      @victorianspectre7748 10 років тому +31

      KILLERESKU cs
      If you stole Chuck Norris' personal vehicle, the legality of it would be the least of your worries

    • @Andrei-xi5tu
      @Andrei-xi5tu 10 років тому +7

      Victorian Spectre Good one.

  • @lozomex
    @lozomex 10 років тому

    Looking forward to seeing your Airframes out there!

  • @austinphonisay7455
    @austinphonisay7455 8 років тому +8

    Your shotgun is so weak let's compare a BB gun shotgun to a real shotgun

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  8 років тому

      +austin phonisay ua-cam.com/video/qwgxYPM7JrQ/v-deo.html

    • @MrAzcabowabo
      @MrAzcabowabo 8 років тому +2

      lol its a mossberg 500. not a bb gun. well sorta, bird shot is bb's

    • @austinphonisay7455
      @austinphonisay7455 8 років тому +1

      Too me it look like a BB gun just saying

    • @nathancad
      @nathancad 8 років тому +4

      +austin phonisay do you know anything about shotguns? or the types of rounds?

    • @t-gmailaccount6796
      @t-gmailaccount6796 8 років тому

      +austin phonisay It's the shells. All shotguns operate with nearly the same velocities with slight differences based on barrel length. The type of shell used was birdshot, which is meant to be shot from further away because the bb's spread the further they fly to increase the impact zone. This test would've been better from 20-25 yards so the bbs could impact the entire drone rather than just a wing of it.

  • @oogaguy9584
    @oogaguy9584 10 років тому

    Ok this might sound a little far fetched but have you ever seen the little nitro powered cars? They have mini gasoline engines that are extremely powerful for their size and weight. Maybe you could construct a bigger drone with these engines. Just an idea.

  • @Chris_t0
    @Chris_t0 8 років тому +7

    guys DONT BUY THIS CRAP

  • @TheCABmedic
    @TheCABmedic 10 років тому

    Mark, You have done an EXCELLENT job marketing your product, and congrads on exceding your mark on Kickstarter. I will buy one of your airframes, but the real testament is for the GO PRO!! Have you made them aware...maybe a sponsorship? I will buy a GO PRO, and I look forward to the future...Good luck!

  • @bobrusable
    @bobrusable 10 років тому +5

    Brookstone parrot drone is a lot better then this crap for half the price.

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому +5

      Spoken like a true noob. Thanks for the comment. And share the link.

    • @bobrusable
      @bobrusable 10 років тому

      Marque Cornblatt Prod.
      No thanks, don't want my friend's and family getting ripped off on this piece of crap..

    • @GlobalTrekPOV
      @GlobalTrekPOV 10 років тому +1

      bobrusable No worries. Enjoy the AR Drone. Thanks for watching and share the links!

    • @TheOjoneso
      @TheOjoneso 9 років тому +1

      bobrusable U radio shack shoppers and crack me up! I bet half the things in your house has "AS SEEN ON TV" stickers on them haha.

    • @bobrusable
      @bobrusable 9 років тому

      Oliver Jones
      How did you know.. Top quality stuff bud.

  • @fredbesaw1974
    @fredbesaw1974 9 років тому +2

    I liked the fact that the Go Pro surviving. Durability for a quad is a legitimate quest. With the popularity of quads and drones, they are here to stay and we will see more as time goes. I just wish people wouldn’t test the limits of quad with the law. Just the other day an idiot flew one over a News helicopter and around it, let’s ruins it for the respected folks!!! Thanks for putting the video together.

  • @James-ux2td
    @James-ux2td 11 років тому +10

    Try a bazooka on it XD

  • @LernestW
    @LernestW 9 років тому +2

    Holy crap man! I cannot believe the abuse that you get in these comments! I have not seen anything to warrant some of these ignorant comments. Cool vid, great product.

  • @qntt2002
    @qntt2002 11 років тому +4

    Now that's a useless product! Congrats! I am curios how much money did you sink into that.

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  11 років тому

      Useless? That is an interesting perspective. Please elaborate...

    • @qntt2002
      @qntt2002 11 років тому +2

      You made a quad that's heavy, killing the flight time, you made made something cheap expensive with no good reason, and you made it bullet proof to protect 50$ of commonly available electronics. The purpose of a quad in a combat zone is to substitute something precious like human life with something cheap, maneuverable and easily replaceable. Fail!

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  11 років тому +7

      qntt2002 You sound pretty confident about your info regarding my work. What is the weight of my airframe? The flight time? The cost? Compared to what? I have those answers and you do not. But I'll give you a little heads up... This airframe replaces ones that are easily destroyed and offer zero protection with one that is lightweight, inexpensive and offers durable armor that can withstand an amazing amount of battle damage and still function. SInce it will almost never need replacing, I fail to see the "fail" that has you so convinced. Perhaps if you're in the Bay area, you can attend our next drone fight club with your best combat drone. It would be fun to let this discussion play out in the aerial combat arena. Thanks for the comments and share the links with your buddies.

    • @pablosonfire
      @pablosonfire 10 років тому

      Marque Cornblatt Prod.
      my dads bigger than your dad

    • @qntt2002
      @qntt2002 10 років тому +3

      No doubt about it! But mine is smarter ;)

  • @michaelwarwick9930
    @michaelwarwick9930 9 років тому

    Hi there,
    I've become interested in drones because of a writing project I'm working on, and just wanted to say that I loved your post!
    This is partly because I have an enquiring mind and because I'm an engineer, but principally because you seem genuine and open with what you're doing. That goes a long way with me.
    Mick (Uk)

  • @rylankern7212
    @rylankern7212 9 років тому +4

    Why does everyone have some weird fettish for shooting down drones?

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  9 років тому +8

      Americans will shoot at anything new or different.

    • @jgartworld
      @jgartworld 9 років тому +3

      Marque Cornblatt Prod. I think it has more to do with the camera mounted on it. People don't like being recorded without their consent. If they only knew how thoroughly they are being monitored in their everyday lives...
      Cool video by the way. I've been looking into DIY FPV setups and it's awesome how many resources there are for this stuff online. :) happy flying

  • @javierids
    @javierids 10 років тому

    Hi!! Did the UAV tortule prototipe have a carbon fiber frame?
    The test is fantastic!!

  • @samestron3453
    @samestron3453 8 років тому +3

    so gayyyyyyyyy

    • @Tensho_C
      @Tensho_C 8 років тому

      +Sam Estron ...

  • @jhabib1914
    @jhabib1914 10 років тому +1

    The drone wasnt in close range so of course there wont be major damage but im0 give you props for putting 3months on the line.

  • @zachsplep
    @zachsplep 9 років тому

    With the engines off, have you tried to throw it up into the air by one of its arms, then start the engines while in mid-air to see if it will fly?

  • @Ghostginthree
    @Ghostginthree 10 років тому +1

    That is a cool drone. Nice testing, good to see.

  • @sunwoozy
    @sunwoozy 10 років тому +1

    this is basicly both drone testing and camera testing

  • @ryrieplays798
    @ryrieplays798 10 років тому

    This is the coolest, sleekest and the most durable quad I've ever seen in my life, will there be a UK store?

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому

      Thanks! We'll have UK distribution soon, but until then they are available online here: www.gameofdrones.biz/

  • @oceanic0809
    @oceanic0809 4 роки тому

    To coin a Star Wars phrase:
    This is definitely the drone you’re looking for.

  • @AAtanvardo
    @AAtanvardo 11 років тому +1

    Wow! You should consider making it serial model - I would like to buy one of this!

  • @justatotallyrandomguy4911
    @justatotallyrandomguy4911 10 років тому

    Always wanted a camera that can withstand crashing, fire, dropping and shotgun? Wait no more, get your GoPro now.

  • @Caver461
    @Caver461 9 років тому +1

    I am thinking that the real benefit of that protective cover might be its elasticity thus reducing the jarring of sudden impact. If it was acting more like a rigid shell the drone would have shattered the window more easily. Interesting experiment - thanks.

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  9 років тому

      Like a well made saddle, it has flex without suffering structural integrity.

  • @eriche95
    @eriche95 8 років тому +1

    To everyone that says it's not indestructible:
    Yes, of course it is not indestructible, but you try making something better.

  • @pakalae
    @pakalae 9 років тому +1

    Shotgun vs Drone Airframe: I still think the shotgun took less damage, but we didn't get a close-up camera angle so it's hard to say for sure. I'll take one of each.

  • @HenrikGamborg
    @HenrikGamborg 10 років тому

    Most indestructible? There is only one level of "Indestructible" and that is.... "Indestructible". You might have made the worlds most "Durable" drone. But it's sertainly not indestructible.
    On another note, i love it. Looks realy cool, and cant wait to see what it's going to end up being.

  • @TribeOfCRAKERZ
    @TribeOfCRAKERZ 10 років тому

    The shot gun blast had a effect on it, did you try taking it back up after the first shot without repairs...

  • @AutoCarb
    @AutoCarb 10 років тому +1

    Am I the only one that saw the electronics being constantly destroyed and replaced? I'm not sure I would call that indestructible, you can fix anything to make it flyable again the impressive factor would be if no parts needed replacing.

  • @MichaelAxelKlose
    @MichaelAxelKlose 10 років тому

    Love this! Flying through fire, what a concept...Makes for great footage!

  • @kdknitro
    @kdknitro 10 років тому

    laugh, nothing was affected, except all the parts you replaced lol. But still cool to see you guys actually torture testing a quad like this its pretty different from what everyone else is doing with these things. Keep up the good work.

  • @eFilomeo
    @eFilomeo 10 років тому

    It seems like if you took this air-frame and gave it 6 - 8 propellers instead. You would be able to sustain a shot or two as the extra lift from the other legs would be able to automatically adjust for the other leg's loss. Just a thought.

  • @Vebs.
    @Vebs. 10 років тому

    my only comment is that it was brought down by the windows and certainly the shot gun. However i can see why it was considered a success due to the fact that it is very durable and that what damage it did receive could be easily replaced. Congrats.

  • @conrad3895
    @conrad3895 10 років тому

    of course it's still flying in the second shot cause you freaking repaired the dam motor and the arm!!!

  • @paulclarke7696
    @paulclarke7696 10 років тому +1

    Very Interesting Sir - Well Done and totally crazy!

  • @Colinpark
    @Colinpark 8 років тому +2

    Great way to get a split lip by firing a non stocked shotgun from the shoulder

  • @ernestabc123
    @ernestabc123 8 років тому +1

    'Let's shoot it, oh look it works! It's indestructible!' - No it's not, your replaced every part that was hit! That's not indestructible!

    • @ernestabc123
      @ernestabc123 8 років тому

      If I shot my Dji and send it to them for repairs and then it works after can I claim it's indestructible?

    • @ernestabc123
      @ernestabc123 8 років тому

      I make vlogs with my drone! Feel free to check them out!

    • @alec_508
      @alec_508 8 років тому

      they are talking about the airframe not the drone parts

  • @Awnydam
    @Awnydam 10 років тому

    Sweet Drone Frame dude. If it were my hobby i'd get one of those.

  • @jamesram4869
    @jamesram4869 9 років тому +1

    where is this sold? how much does it cost?

  • @kerenchadwick6535
    @kerenchadwick6535 10 років тому

    Absolutely brill mate fandabbydosey !!!!! (In other words. ..FANTASTIC) !!😊😊

  • @WillowMelody
    @WillowMelody 9 років тому +1

    "Taking several shots at it did nothing but scuff the plastic."
    Besides the other damage it did.
    It's impressive how much damage it can take, but to say it wasn't affected by the tests is wrong. Easily fixed and durable, yes, but hardly indestructible.
    Though it's getting there, I suppose.

  • @tinyeung3468
    @tinyeung3468 9 років тому

    this guy is doing experiments to prepare for after judgement day of alien drone swarms

  • @BeerBaron-hx4ev
    @BeerBaron-hx4ev 8 років тому

    That is one tough drone. Really cool video. Thanks

  • @boredfish80
    @boredfish80 10 років тому +1

    but...will it blend?

  • @MichaelArmentano
    @MichaelArmentano 10 років тому +2

    Not sure why anyone would downvote this.

    • @MarqueCornblatt
      @MarqueCornblatt  10 років тому +4

      I wonder that myself. Either way I win, so it's all gravy. Thx for watching!

    • @SlayerofFiction
      @SlayerofFiction 10 років тому +5

      The shotgun choice and load was a joke which probably is where the negative aspect came from, good salesmanship, but the last part was a turn off for many I suspect.
      A pistol grip shotgun sucks and is for amateurs at best or people breaching doors. Aim is seriously cut down as well as velocity +1 on his zombie tape job though :P
      So for the sake of the argument of the video this is highly unlikely to be the shotgun which would be used to shoot it down. More than likely an actual bird gun with longer barrel and a bird load which can very amazingly. Heavy goose shot would probably mangle it while light should would do nothing.
      The last shot with the shotgun on here is what we call in trap an air move. Meaning the air coming from the pellets actually pushes the clay in a certain direction looking like a hit. Honestly it did not even look like this was the case, just a flat out miss which is easier than you may think.
      Distance also plays a huge role, it not unusual to get "Peppered" from pellets while out fowl hunting, it always stings and rarely breaks skin, again, depending on shot used.
      Had a defense shotgun like this actually been used it would have been loaded with some short of buckshot any which would obliterate it as they have no trouble penetrating walls etc.

  • @thefourwafflelords1639
    @thefourwafflelords1639 8 років тому

    I got an idea
    Little drones that fight fires on smaller scales by themselves, but put together it is effective.