Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
1. Three Founding Sociological Theories
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 тра 2013
- A brief introduction to the three most classic sociological theories: Conflict Theory, Structural Functionalism, and Symbolic Interactionism.
Dr. Daniel Davis is a lecturer in sociology at San Diego State University. He is also an academic and career coach, committed to empowering people towards their goals with clarity and intentionality. More information about his research, teaching, and coaching can be found at: www.danieldavis.net
Dr. Davis also hosts a website of tutorials on research methods, sociology, and academic coaching at: www.methodsmentor.com
This is well explained . Thank you so much for the lesson
thank you so much afor the video , im using it for my sociology hw !!
Same today.
Please make a video for each approach!!! Webarian,Marxist, Functionalist, Interpretivist, Feminist ect
Loved this very interesting and you make it easy to understand !
THANK YOU FOR THE KNOWLEDGE PROVIDED🙏
Thank you. You explained this as clear as glass
How is sociology going today? Are they trying to integrate their models to the amazing progress in social psychology, neuroscience, anthropology, among others?
Great video! Thank you! I have a question, does elite schools have access to elite information and data?
could you explain it more using education for all of the theories?
excellent Dr. Ghulam
Thank You Verry Much
Thank you for explaining very clearly about sociology
Thank you this will help me understand what to write in my essay
Thank you for your video 🙏
do you happen to have any videos on integrative theorization?
finally I understand the theories! thank you!!
thank you so much afor the video , im using it for my sociology hw
Anyone could explain where does the Stanford prison experiment falls on the Sociological Perspective circle?
This is great man, thanks
impressive explanation sir, thanks a lot!
Thank you so much for the lesson
it's really interesting....thank u ,sir
Dan Davis Can you explain about the EYE as a symbol to describe about the 3 sociological paradigm?
Very precisely and nicely explained vedio!! :)
thank you so much for video
Thanks, Dan!
thanks dad!
understandable, have a nice day
Awesome video, thank u
"bones in the body" *draws eyes* hehehe.
Foodoo
Eye sockets in the skull.
thank you, i hope this is useful
thankkkkkk youuuu! You helped me so much!
To people who are unhappy with society, it's power struggle or made of shared meaning, but to those who aren't unhappy, society is an organism. Dunno, that's just my theory, who knows what's right. Also, that person you drew kinda looks the dude from Covetous.
Thank you
That sounds more like a Social Stratification class but cool video!
great video!
Thanks for the video
You've explained it very well man except for the fact that you were pretty fast. In my opinion in order to be a great speaker and also to draw more listeners you must go a bit slow from next time around.
very true,,,cant hear a thing
Thanks
nice share
Please be a Little Slower in Teaching Speed & Please Provide Lectures for All Theoretical Aspects of Sociology. Thanks.
We really do live in a society.
Thank so much a for video
Preparations for interview for PCS
Mksh materinya
Great
Lmao @ "definitely green" haha
👌
It's great but lacking of an explanation of UTILITARIANISM
TheWeirdestTube I'd argue that the theories of this video are theories of how reality should be studied, whereas utalitarianism is a theory of how people are assumed to behave. Of course, you can assume people act in a utalitarian (or traditionalist or any other) way and then focus on the effects of their behavior from the perspective of one of these lenses.
+TheWeirdestTube Utilitarianism is the belief that we should focus our actions so they may give us the greatest benefactors.
Aren't there 4 sociological lenses? Marxisme/Neo Marxism or social conflict theories?
jemamaopeenstokje There are many sociological theories. These three represent the broad traditional foundations that most newer theories draw from. Marxism and Neo-Marxism are part of the Conflict tradition, along with most critical studies (e.g. critical race studies, critical gender studies). Symbolic interactionism is related to post-modernism, semiotics, constructivism, etc. And functionalism has somewhat fallen out of favor, but I see a renewed energy in this line of thinking coming from those who really like network analysis and big data approaches to studying society. In my humble opinion, sociologists do best by knowing when to layer these lenses, rather than choosing one as "right" and the others "wrong." Each helps you think of different questions in a situation, like below, pretend you are studying changes in the tax laws:
Marxist/Conflict: What injustice can we expose? Example: How do new tax laws favor the rich and add to inequality?
Symbolic: How does this group make sense or meaning of that experience? Example: Why do poor Republicans often vote for things that are not in their best economic interest, because of their party identification?
Functionalism: How does one part of the system interact with other parts? How does a policy change in taxation impact education spending, or social security, or job creation?
I new it
ok
If I had a phone for every gender there was I would have 2.
"long neck..."
hahahaha
John Phillip R. Pesebre haha when he said that I thought of a long neck dinosaur 🦕
salam
Pov. You're here from college
great why to explain/understandable of the 3 main classic of sociological theories, also sexy voice ;)
+marco frazier hahahaha
Thanks