Running an experiment in the IBM Quantum Experience

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @FritzSchober
    @FritzSchober 8 років тому +283

    The more I read about Quantum computers the less I understand. I feel like my grandparents when I explained them the Commodore 64 and the concept of bits and bytes. It was all so clear to me and I couldn't really understand why they where not able to "get it". Now we have Quantum computers and now I am like my grandparents. I try to understand it, but it makes no sense in my head.

  • @EvanZamir
    @EvanZamir 8 років тому +431

    No idea what is going on.

  • @grido24
    @grido24 8 років тому +141

    explanation as to how the simulator works fall short of details quite quickly. "You draw this and you get that" was not really what I needed to understand.

  • @vaibhavsingh9x
    @vaibhavsingh9x 8 років тому +63

    If the second block is used to hide the card in the 4th slot, and we already know which slot the card is in, what exactly is happening in the quantum inversion step? Doesn't it already know where the card is?

  • @manny2718
    @manny2718 8 років тому +50

    How is the quantum system able to correctly "guess" the position of the queen without "knowing" anything about the system? How is it possible for the system to "perceive" something completely randomized and disconnected as a shuffled deck of cards? In short, what is the theory that describes how this is possible?

    • @telmotrooper
      @telmotrooper 8 років тому +3

      +Emanuel Hignutt, Jr., MPH That summarizes my doubts aswell. lol

    • @manny2718
      @manny2718 8 років тому +2

      The only way the quantum computer could "calculate" the position of queen would be to somehow "sense" the wavefunction of the queen card and thereby locate its position. Correct?

    • @telmotrooper
      @telmotrooper 8 років тому +8

      I think we're somehow missing the point here since we can only think in terms of usual logic. That or IBM is playing an elaborate trick on us.

  • @EdwinKadavy0011
    @EdwinKadavy0011 8 років тому +20

    wait I am confused. it can calculate where the queen will be without any initial input information?

  • @jacobmalone5296
    @jacobmalone5296 8 років тому +2

    Amazing technology, I never thought such a powerful research tool would ever be able to exist like this and available to the public! Amazing learning tool!

  • @MattMenees
    @MattMenees 8 років тому +9

    Hey, Grover! Guess what. I only pretended to want to find the queen, but I really wanted the jack. How about you find the right card without me telling you which one I want.

  • @DjNemes1s
    @DjNemes1s 8 років тому +34

    I need a new quantum brain to have any chance of understanding what he just said.....

  • @Derhemion
    @Derhemion 8 років тому +5

    Good explanation on how to easily win in Blackjack :)

  • @y2kblackout
    @y2kblackout 8 років тому +3

    I don't understand how this works... could you not use the same process to predict the lotto numbers?

  • @rollingwaves1290
    @rollingwaves1290 8 років тому +22

    as an English major I feel so dumb watching this I want to cry

  • @jboss38
    @jboss38 8 років тому +29

    that mean, you can find the number of LOTO ? :)

  • @simoncarlile5190
    @simoncarlile5190 8 років тому +7

    So could you run the algorithm to find the factors of large semiprime numbers with this, or is that algorithm too complicated?

    • @EugeneGlushkov
      @EugeneGlushkov 8 років тому +1

      +Simon Carlile you could, but only for small numbers. For large numbers you need many more qubits (hundreds at least).

    • @MaxParadiz
      @MaxParadiz 8 років тому +2

      +Simon Carlile You can implement Shor's algorithm to factorize semiprime numbers. The complexity of the algorithm is not the issue - the limiting factor is the difficulty of building a processor with enough qubits to factorize large numbers.

  • @lucarnetrange
    @lucarnetrange 8 років тому +21

    I don't need a quantum computer to guess that the Queen is in slot 4, if I set it in the 4th slot at the start. That sounds completely bogus.

  • @kelvinfilyk3413
    @kelvinfilyk3413 8 років тому +1

    This is insane. I almost can't believe this is possible

  • @ramykamel
    @ramykamel 8 років тому +3

    Now I need to grab a good resource on quantum computing fundamentals :-)

    • @EugeneGlushkov
      @EugeneGlushkov 8 років тому +4

      +Ramy Kamel courses.edx.org/courses/BerkeleyX/CS191x/2013_Spring/info

  • @Birkes
    @Birkes 8 років тому +1

    I love what you're doing, IBM, now it's way easier to study quantum computing - because we basically have it available at hand! But one question; Was the queen in the 4th slot? Isn't the computer supposed to know the cards first?

    • @MaxParadiz
      @MaxParadiz 8 років тому +11

      +Birkes It is a search algorithm.
      The computer stored the queen in slot 4 (around 1:55), but it doesn't 'remember' the exact location where it stored. A classical computer would have to search for the queen by going to each of the possible slots and checking if the queen is there, until it finds it. It could find the queen on the first try (and be faster than a quantum computer!), or it could find the queen in the last place it looks. When there are many slots in which the queen could be hiding, the quantum algorithm will find the queen much faster.

  • @muchavvir
    @muchavvir 8 років тому +14

    Time to google grover's algorithm

  • @nadim8379
    @nadim8379 8 років тому +4

    I'm maybe too dumb but i didn't quite get it yet...

  • @Sleepl3ss
    @Sleepl3ss 8 років тому +5

    Quantum computing is going to bring forth a bunch of awesome tech. Can't wait!

  • @KerrieMenzer
    @KerrieMenzer 8 років тому +1

    let's do some quantum experiments! :)

  • @Fnatixful
    @Fnatixful 8 років тому

    I didnt get what this has to do with the chance of finding the queen in 4 cards xd, dont know whats the input

  • @mehdi1favoris
    @mehdi1favoris 8 років тому +1

    Can we say that now, we can solve complex mathematic problems ?

  • @dg-hughes
    @dg-hughes 8 років тому +8

    You lost me at the quantum inversion step.

    • @EugeneGlushkov
      @EugeneGlushkov 8 років тому +1

      +David Hughes here the Grover's algorithm is explained in more detail: courses.edx.org/courses/BerkeleyX/CS191x/2013_Spring/info

  • @carlosmanuellopezcortazar3903
    @carlosmanuellopezcortazar3903 8 років тому

    Now, make a "quantum deep blue"

  • @JoelBondurant
    @JoelBondurant 8 років тому +1

    assembly language meets visual basic? how about a python api???? pretty plz sugar and spice.

  • @야르-f2p
    @야르-f2p 8 років тому +1

    nice quantum computing

  • @bbingtube
    @bbingtube 8 років тому +5

    uhhh... i still dont get it. ?? fukn magic I say.

  • @MrGrasgruen
    @MrGrasgruen 8 років тому +10

    What ? :D

  • @maged.william
    @maged.william 8 років тому +1

    Cool 5Qubit, dwave had 4Qubit.

  • @Pbdave1092
    @Pbdave1092 8 років тому +2

    couldn't understand a thing...

  • @QD77
    @QD77 8 років тому

    L'a pô compris ! Lol
    Don't understand much of that, but it sounds awesome !

  • @skyr8449
    @skyr8449 8 років тому

    nice

  • @Inexorable9295
    @Inexorable9295 8 років тому

    great tbh

  • @Shotyonly
    @Shotyonly 8 років тому +1

    ?

  • @godbennett
    @godbennett 8 років тому

    Exquisite