▶ Comparison of The Terminator 4K (A.I.Upscaled) HDR10 vs 2013 REAMASTERED vs 2006 EDITION
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 бер 2024
- 4K, From HDR10 Sources, Music Remix, Logo & Montage by Score Man from The3hirdEye PRODUCTION®
Twitter: @The3hirdEye
Instagram: moonizationmy
My UA-cam channel: My moonization
===================================================================
Music By Brad Fiedel
About the soundtrack: www.milanrecords.com/release/...
===================================================================
Note: « The Terminator (1984) 2160p, Ai-Upscaled from a complete 1080p Blu-ray ISO. I then increased the framerate from the default 24fps, to 60fps via SVP 4 PRO + TensorRT RIFE 4.14v2
Forget the blurry edges of standard frame rates. Imagine a world where action explodes off the screen with crystalline clarity, where emotions flicker across faces with breathtaking detail, where every punch, every pirouette, every bullet whizzes by in hyper-vivid reality. This is the future of cinema, unveiled by High Frame Rate (HFR).
HFR shatters the 24fps glass ceiling, unleashing a torrent of 60 or 120 frames per second, etc. That redefines cinematic immersion. No more motion blur shrouding epic battles, no more missed nuances in delicate performances. Experience a world where reality blurs with fiction, where you're no longer watching a movie, you're living it.
HFR isn't just about speed. It's about precision. It's about capturing the raw beauty and brutality of movement with unmatched fidelity. Witness the intricate choreography of a fight scene, the heart-stopping plunge of a freefall, the tear glistening on a cheek - all with a depth and sharpness that leaves traditional film breathless.
Hollywood is on the cusp of a revolution. Directors like Ang Lee and James Cameron are pioneers, pushing the boundaries of storytelling with HFR's hyper-real lens. From action blockbusters to intimate dramas, this new technology unlocks a universe of possibilities.
Embrace the future. Step into the hyperreality. Demand HFR. Because tomorrow's cinema isn't just watched, it's experienced.
Don't just see the story. Feel it. Breathe it. Live it. HFR »
Original Technical Specifications: www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/...
New Technical Specifications:
Format: Matroska
Format version: Version 4
Overall bit rate mode: Variable
Overall bit rate: 36.0 Mb/s
Frame rate: 59.940 FPS
Writing application: mkvmerge v79.0 ('Funeral Pyres') 64-bit
Writing library: libebml v1.4.4 + libmatroska v1.7.1 / Lavf60.20.100
VIDEOAI: Enhanced using alq-13. Changed resolution to 3840x2160
=================================================================== - Фільми й анімація
It's 40 yrs this year, and we need this on 4k. Hope kino, arrow video ect can pick this up
Warner will pick this up this year
@@LuniMW hope so , and a collector edition would be nice ( uk)
I just hope that whoever does it, they keep James Cameron far away from it. Ideally I would have liked Arrow Video to do it. It's right up their alley genre-wise, they have a deal with MGM currently and their Blu-rays include original audio tracks.
Some of the scenes are impressive, but the upscaling scrubs the grain. Everyone looks waxy and artificial. Cameron would approve.
Interesting fact. Lord of the Rings in 4K looks also some kind of waxy.
Very impressive upscale Moon and thanks for your hard work as usual ❤!!!!!!!!!!
Own the remastered and it's a very good effort, the upscaled look great, a little bit clean, but great nevertheless. Thanks Moon!
This looks amazing here's hoping cami does he proud ??!! 💞💞👍👍🙏😻
I actually saw this in theater last week from 35mm and i was totally blown away how effective that old dirty print was. It was like watching it the very first time. Now none of these prints look right to me!
The 2013 remaster would be pretty much perfect if it didn't suffer from the Orange-and-Teal colour changes. It's like they went back and made it look like Terminator 2.
I'm not a fan of the AI version presented here either: it removes too much detail, including all the film grain, and characters' skin is scrubbed of fine pores and other aspects (see Arnold's hand or Lance Henriksen's face), while deepening wrinkles and adding contrast where it didn't exist originally. As others have noted, it leaves an artificial impression, like a computer game. The scenery and machinery does look sharper in the AI version, but I just want a 4K scan of the original, grain and flaws included 😁
I do appreciate the effort, though, and thanks for putting out the comparison video 😊
The AI version over-sharpens the edges and over-smooths the details, imo.
True. Seems like the AI treats real footage as ''graphics'' footage. This would make virtual footage (games) looks damn good but for actual humans and environnements, it would need some kind of actual cinematographer input to learn and get that crisp touch to not go too artificial
very impressive, well done
10:14 Prine example of the Blu-rays horrible teal tint
12:08 wow, goodbye grain.... 😮
Skynet is remastering our movies lol Some shots look great but the human closeups look a bit fake. Maybe it’ll better in motion idk. Good work as always Moon!
I can't wait to see the Shrek The Third movie comparison in 4K😊
I do like 4k restorations that are faithful to the original film grain feel, but I have to admit that the recent Cameron movies are growing on me. I like grain OK, but 4K transfers like Ghostbusters and Alien 1 were just a bit too grainy. I predict that the average 4K purchaser will like these better and everyone but just the film purists, too.
Not made my mind up about these AI upscales and I won’t until I see them but I’m definitely in two minds about them. One one hand it looks great but on the other it looks kind of artificial/fake/smooth/video game-like.
I do however think that the 2013 Blu Ray already looks great and from this comparison I’d rather see that restored in 4k hdr which would be a better overall result?
My choice is the 4K AI upscaled version.Not comparing to 2006 version and Remastered version.
Un grand merci pour le partage, savez vous si il sortira en Blu ray 4k et quand ? svp
Étant donné qu’on est en 2024, ça peut être l’occasion pour que ce film sorte dans une édition avec spéciale anniversaire. Mais toutefois, aucune info pour l’instant. Merci pour votre commentaire.
merci pour votre réponse@@Mymoonization
Who is making these A.I. upscales, and what software are they using, as it does not look like any commercially available software I have used. The results are far more natural, and have none of the usual artifacts. Almost like somebody has rescanned the negative, and not used A.I. whatsoever…
Is the upscale on disc ? I think it looks awesome, what you loose in grain-fine detail is more than made up with beautiful contrast and colour.
This is only a demo of what the future edition for this film could possibly be !
@@Mymoonization oh thanks , I hope its as good as the demo you're showing as it looks amazing.
AI upscale may look waxy, but it is a faithful sharpening of the the original image. What I don’t understand is what is going on with Cameron’s approved AI remasters, where there are scenes with fine detail that’s completely new, not merely noise removal and edge sharpening. How are they doing that?
Those next gen algorithms are already surfacing, where it really makes up detail from learned sources.
Makes you think there are more interesting creative ways to train these models than simply “faithful” restoration of old stuff
Each of these have their pros and cons
-The 2006 release has that dirty film look which some may appreciate, and has the original color timing
-the 2013 release has the best overall quality, a clean print with film grain intact, tho with new caneron-esque color timing
-The AI upscale does provide a nice boost in sharpness, albiet at the cost of the film grain..
Movies aren’t meant to look like video games, it’s the other way round surely 🤔
Ai upscale for the win, to bady 8ts only 4k not requaler blu ray as far as I know
Bah non so, molto belle le immagini in 4k AI ma perde completamente il feeling della pellicola, sembra quasi un videogioco
I have seen a 4k A.I. Upscaled of the terminator wich is 2 or 3 years old. Is it a new one (better)?
Much better as you can see !
@@Mymoonization That's the problem actually, i can't see much on my old laptop. But thank you, I will find this and watch it on My BenQ HT4550i 😉
I prefer the AI in most of these still examples, but I’d love to see the actual video to determine what looks best
I don't like the remastered blu ray, it looks glossy. The original blu ray is more balanced. I dig the 4k upscale but I'm going to be super disappointed if the official release leaves out the mono audio yet again
Where do I find the AI upscale version?
Hey Mark
This is my personal work.
Also, my next comparison will be Judge Dredd via A.I.
Thank you for your interest.
Cheers !
The long wait, until AI can upscale all of my 480p dvds to 4K live, without cheating by finding the 4K version online as a source it will 'learn' from..
All I wish is for the 4k to be struck from the 2008 blu ray, it's the most closest looking to how it was shown theatrically. The colour timing is all wrong for The remastered version and the AI version just looks worse
Part of the grit of Terminator is the film grain. Getting rid of it lessons the dystopian cinematography.
You're certainly right to point out that cinematically, grain is essential to films in general. However, it is a technological progress that must be accepted or not in my opinion. Because in reality if we want to go in this direction, that is to say increase the resolution, we must also accept that in reality, our eyes do not see any grain and therefore, what I show in this video, perhaps gives the answer is future technology that will undoubtedly take a long time to accept but that one day we will have to admit that it is that and not otherwise. Just look at the history of cinema and the technology used for over 100 years. There is neither evil nor scandal in all this. It's just a matter of taste and stylistic and artistic preference. And it shouldn't be surprising that there are directors who are taking this direction because I think it's the way to go if you want to achieve better visual qualities.
Anyway thanks for your comment !
Very interesting comparison! A.I. version add much in term of sharpness and contrast which is super, but in the other hand, remove to much grain, which is very bad so all surfaces look way to clean, waxy style, specially looking at the mountains in the last image.
this video isn't HDR tho
Hold your horses and wait for the video to do its process on UA-cam, because it's a long video and HDR processing is in progress ok !!!
0:14 Once again, the original color timing is butchered and replaced with a stupid teal tint. I wish this trend would die.
A.I upscaling makes it look like the cgi Arnold from Salvation. I'd rather keep the blu ray we have than that, looks like utter arse.
Awful. Thanks for showing this, Ai upscaling is awful
I tend to prefer the 2013 master (I have the 2015 Lionsgate Blu-ray). Yes it is slightly cyan-shifted but it's not abusive.
Looks faker, that's for sure. I'm sure in motion it would be the typical uncanny grotesquery. Down with A.I.
Pffff!!!!!
AI 4K version is my least favorite - just look at the blue hair at 6:05.
Pretty waxy, like T2.
Taking away grain, character and texture is the cinema equivalent of Botox, a facelift and a toupee. Let classic films be their charming selves.
Well, that's just awful.. The teal and orange look nearly every movie today receives is just wrong.. Absolutely sure we will get a new color grade for many movies in a couple of years. Also, the upscale version looks so bad in many shots.. Like a waxy or Aquarelle version of the movie. The punks at the beginning even recieved plastic hairs with that upscale
Remastered bluray version have perfect picture Quality👍 and in germany is a 4k remastered bluray version👍