Would be great if you can increase/normalize guest speaker's volume. Also there are a lot of research on alternative materials in battery technology, maybe too deep to dive into. But definitely an interesting topic. Anyway, I do feel the guest has held back in the interview...
I remembered that there is a recommendation of a book called " The Digital Silk Road", it is exactly the same strategy. Having significant exploitable cheap labour, the initial step is to offer cut-throat price as competitive edge to bring profit on the table. On acquiring big enough market, some underhanded maneuvers such as IP theft, coercive technology transfer, will be used to rebrand their own invention offering significant discount to the same product in the market. The next step is to create a vicious strategic dependence on these company's product and brand themselves into the supply chain. The end goal is simply to use the already too-big-to-be-ignored market share to dictate the rules and standard. Commodity like mineral resources is no doubt of strategic importance. Once these things stick, it cannot be undone easily.
Between Germany and Belgium the iron ore and coal were in layers. Very convenient. Now in another part of the world the iron ore and coal were ocean apart. So one source must move to another to make things happen. The world expo in Vancouver in 1976 highlighted the importance of transport and communication. Logically follow is One Belt One Road. Logically transportation became a legitimate “peace time war” target. That is why conflict was in Syria, Russia underwater gas pipe was blown, China is a whipping boy all round. That is why tension in South China Sea waterway. The fact is America has no money. Many countries join in the Karaoke party for the night. When it comes to real punch we have to wait and see. . >>>On America policies a lot of people often would say Trump this and Trump that. If we listen carefully Trump had told us way back when back when he was an empty head. He said he loved to have two opposing camps arguing in front of him to aid his decision. Evidence is he fired the first shot against China by raising import tax on steel and aluminum. Immediately Canada and Mexico screamed and prompted Merkel flew over to talk down on him. China's share of import was only 7%. This is the depth of his advise. Only a few days ago Trump's former staff said he witnessed foreign leaders at Oval Office treated Trump as a fool. >>>The World Order since 1945 has come to an abyss. This is not because America said China was a threat or China said America wanted to destroy them. Kissinger's wise words after signing the peace treaty with Vietnam that no empire lasted more than 200 years in history. The challenge is whether China would emerge quick enough to earn the respect of other countries. The answer, perhaps, is in the news in HK.
@@htsvdunm if what you said is true , The combined power of China is really that strong, Taiwan would have been invaded by China already given the proud character of your beloved leader Xi...
今日講回， 可清楚稀土處理既難度， 行外人有何記定睇法此終無用。 其實用心聽聽專家意見，余生反而答得中肯。
多謝余博士分析 多謝主持
中華人民共和國在這方面嘅優勢係 沒有獨立嘅工會 ，而且中國共產黨控制一切嘅媒體 ， 強大嘅極權專政機器 ，呢啲都係其他亞非拉嘅專制國家所沒有嘅優勢。 任何所謂環保產業咗產生嘅更多污染 都可以輕易被封鎖消息
🙏thanks for info and support you
多謝討論topic, 下次可以試試被訪問者的音色才回始，回音比較太大！
謝謝分享這方面的知識 ~~🙏🙏
想辦法開發研究一新礦物,取代或稀土之功能,不會沒有可能吧 ! 科技日新月異,不相信稀土沒法取代.
不是沒有，但是要時間和資源。
只是在技術出來前，稀土的價值都是有。
先了解咗稀土是咩先啦，十幾種唔同的元素，到ai殺哂人類都味取代
只係會講日新月異日新月異，50年前夠話日新月異，2000年就到火星啦，我哋依家在哪裡？
稀土元素其實一點也不稀，稀土元素指的是第3族過渡金屬，包括第四週期的鈧，第五週期的釔，第六週期的15個鑭系元素(只有 锝/鎝 具放射性)，以及第七週期的15個錒系元素(全部有放射性，鈾就是其一)，它們的化學特性接近，難以分離。
在地球，其中的釹(鑭系)為41.5ppm，鑭為39ppm，釔為33ppm，鈧為ppm，豐度也比我們大氣中佔78%、蛋白質的構成成份的氮(19ppm)還要多很多。
지랄하네 자식같다구 이웃같다구 니네는 그런 자식같은 애들 바가지 씨우냐?
www.youtuibee.com/watch?v=e8yCBRiybEa
출산대책은 포기 하세요 이미 하늘로부터 버림받은 민족이라 출산율 증가는 무슨 대책을 해도 안됩니다
現在見到的 貨幣/能源/經濟 戰，東西雙方廿卅年前早已預視到，起碼自己約廿五年前就已聽過張五常提及。就是在西方民間，約十多年前已有不少人討論。也就是說，雙方絕對不會毫無準備，坐以待斃，現在見到的都只是一些表象，到全面決裂時大家才會見到真章。對西方而言，在 貨幣/能源/經濟 戰敗意味整個第一世界沒落，所以最好不要假設甚麼環境保護在先進國家是一些牢不可破的教條，有需要時找個動聽點的借口，政策就可以轉向。近期已聽到歐洲一改口風，說雖同是化石燃料，但天然氣是較低碳排，所以也是可以接受的云云。另外，在第三世界設立稀土提煉廠其實早已開始。五六年前已聽到在大馬會開設一家大型的提煉廠，不掌握最尖端提煉技術不等同於次一級技術就不能生產稀土，元素只有純與不純，沒有品質高下之分。另外聞說日本在早年跟大陸關系還未太差時已大量購入稀土，現在已有一定存量，足夠用上一段時間。自己想，日本想得到做得到的事，其他第一世界國家總不會不能吧。其實，稀土在整場戰爭中只是其中一場中等級戰役，真正的大戰是在爭奪儲備貨幣寶座那邊。
PS. 兩年前日本政府聲稱在領海海床發現大量稀土，自己對這點抱有極大懷疑，反而對都市採礦 (Urban mining) 的概念覺得還較可行。
Would be great if you can increase/normalize guest speaker's volume. Also there are a lot of research on alternative materials in battery technology, maybe too deep to dive into. But definitely an interesting topic. Anyway, I do feel the guest has held back in the interview...
博士支咪好重回音 可能唔好用呢種耳機咪 收音更好
💥
💪
印度，烏克蘭天然資源多，人口亦多，人工較低，長遠能否取代強國呢？
Thank you for sharing ❤❤
,😊
i
,
,
/
｛😅😅😅
其實祖國有的礦物，加拿大都有。
但美洲有的，祖國未必有。
I remembered that there is a recommendation of a book called " The Digital Silk Road", it is exactly the same strategy. Having significant exploitable cheap labour, the initial step is to offer cut-throat price as competitive edge to bring profit on the table. On acquiring big enough market, some underhanded maneuvers such as IP theft, coercive technology transfer, will be used to rebrand their own invention offering significant discount to the same product in the market. The next step is to create a vicious strategic dependence on these company's product and brand themselves into the supply chain. The end goal is simply to use the already too-big-to-be-ignored market share to dictate the rules and standard. Commodity like mineral resources is no doubt of strategic importance. Once these things stick, it cannot be undone easily.
Good to
🙏👍👌👏
氦氣呢樣嘢，美國、烏克蘭強項。
受訪者對整個環節甚了解， 但新能源還有核。 而國際政治吾係計 利益（錢）的嗎，呵呵呵呵
ON 9 專家，有技術既國家人工貴，人工平既國家冇技術，照喱套理論，全世界冇任何野可以離開中國
恭喜你发现左呢个世界既真相。贸易战打左4、5年，中国工业产值占世界比率反而从26%增加到接近30%，中美贸易总额从6300亿美元增加到6900亿，惊不惊喜，意不意外？
打过比喻，现时有好多嘅产品都移去越南生产，如果越南在稀土方面可以取代中国，你话啲商家会唔会去越南呢？ 你认为你比专家厉害，咪继续自嗨咯！
@@tuckloongwoo8614稀土元素其實一點也不稀，稀土元素指的是第3族過渡金屬，包括第四週期的鈧，第五週期的釔，第六週期的15個鑭系元素(只有 锝/鎝 具放射性)，以及第七週期的15個錒系元素(全部有放射性，鈾就是其一)，它們的化學特性接近，難以分離。
在地球，其中的釹(鑭系)為41.5ppm，鑭為39ppm，釔為33ppm，鈧為ppm，豐度也比我們大氣中佔78%、蛋白質的構成成份的氮(19ppm)還要多很多。
@@cjh903 祝你偉大的祖國一統宇宙，希望到時候不要把你割了
是因爲在中國可以利用中共來壓榨人權和無需為環境保護負責。。
新能源就是瘦田没人耕，耕起有人争
環境仍然要長期付出代價。
關於氫氣 美國能源部 表示 現時95%嘅氫氣都係由石化產品提煉㗎。
Between Germany and Belgium the iron ore and coal were in layers. Very convenient.
Now in another part of the world the iron ore and coal were ocean apart. So one source must move to another to make things happen. The world expo in Vancouver in 1976 highlighted the importance of transport and communication. Logically follow is One Belt One Road. Logically transportation became a legitimate “peace time war” target. That is why conflict was in Syria, Russia underwater gas pipe was blown, China is a whipping boy all round. That is why tension in South China Sea waterway. The fact is America has no money. Many countries join in the Karaoke party for the night. When it comes to real punch we have to wait and see. .
>>>On America policies a lot of people often would say Trump this and Trump that. If we listen carefully Trump had told us way back when back when he was an empty head. He said he loved to have two opposing camps arguing in front of him to aid his decision. Evidence is he fired the first shot against China by raising import tax on steel and aluminum. Immediately Canada and Mexico screamed and prompted Merkel flew over to talk down on him. China's share of import was only 7%. This is the depth of his advise. Only a few days ago Trump's former staff said he witnessed foreign leaders at Oval Office treated Trump as a fool.
>>>The World Order since 1945 has come to an abyss. This is not because America said China was a threat or China said America wanted to destroy them. Kissinger's wise words after signing the peace treaty with Vietnam that no empire lasted more than 200 years in history. The challenge is whether China would emerge quick enough to earn the respect of other countries. The answer, perhaps, is in the news in HK.
睇来金融业让部分乡港人产生左不切实际既幻想，以为工业生产可以像金融业那样，在键盘上计计数，然后做出决定就可以出效果。一个残酷既事实是，即使连最简单易做既纺织品和服装制造业，从2005年左右就开始从中国向越南孟加拉印度等国转移，再经过贸易战几年所谓既大规模般迁，到目前为止，越南和印度纺织品和服装出口分别只占全球3%和7%、4%和3%而已，而中国“仅剩” 45%和32%，而欧盟仍占18%和28%。不要以为人工低就能取代中国，越南纺织服装行业人工只有中国1/3、欧盟1/6，印度约为中国1/5、欧盟1/10，先取代欧盟再说吧。
有時真係唔係好明點解仲有部份大陸人會拎住低技術產業黎打飛機，呢類產業受惠於低人工同福利保障，亦都缺乏環境管制，aka割韭菜而高速發展。依家講緊開礦產其實都係一樣，唔係咩值得自滿嘅地方，作為世界第二大經濟體仲要依靠收割韭菜去支撐會係一個好大問題，長遠亦都唔會帶來更大經濟效益。大陸講左十九幾年要產業轉型就係必要道路，不過除左講之後，有咩真係做到？高科技就唔好提原來得啖笑，醫療產業係疫情中睇黎就都冇想像中咁好，依家就即管睇係航空產業可以去到幾遠
@@joelchen6117 因為打飛機係神奇國人o既其中一個特色。低端嘢都可以自豪一番。🥶
@@joelchen6117 有时候真系吾明有部分乡港人点解中文退化到连简单几句中文都理解吾到既程度。都话左比你知越南印度人工比中国仲低得多，在纺织服装这种“低技术”既产业努力左十几年，生产力仍然只有中国的零头。低技术领域都无办法取代中国，但部分乡港人仍然幻想用几年就能在手机新能源等中国占比更高既中高技术领域取代中国。自己打紧飞机反而话人地。
一个更残酷既事实是，贸易战打左四五年，中国工业产值全球占比不降反升，从26%增长到近30%。手机领域，全球手机销量前五品牌中国仍占其三，苹果核心供应厂商中国大陆从2018年34家增加到2022年49家，而乡港人寄予厚望的印度越南仍然是0（手机组装是最后也是最低技术既一个环节，不过某些人只看得懂这个，对住富士康要搬离中国既新闻打飞机）。新能源领域，多晶矽中国产能占世界近90%，光伏组件占世界近80%，动力电池世界最大企业中国十占其七 ，总产值亦占世界近七成，电动车产能全球占比去年63%，今年也将接近七成。汽车出口前去年超德国，今年前四个月超过日本，成为世界第一汽车出口国。无人机领域，中国消费级无人机占世界近75%，工业级占55%……
更加令人绝望既系，以上产业有更进一步向中国集中既趋势而不是相反。不过某些乡港人可能有特别既睇法，认为这些产业亦都是容易取代既“低技术”产业，没关系，请继续打你既飞机。
真係唔明大陸教育制度出左咩問題，好多時唔會反思自己不足而先去指責其他人？大力發展低技術行業割左嘅韭菜，係不爭嘅事實，作為世界第二經濟體去到今時今日，勞工福利同環境政策就更加應該同已發展國家去睇齊同改善，向下對比會對勞工有咩幫助？呢點相信好多人都知，不過可惜小熊維尼未必知。盲目追求數據同時就會失去對人嘅尊重，而默默被割嘅韭菜仲有對環境嘅影響，係缺乏公民社會推動之下，韭菜可能就只係韭菜。盲目維護缺點，對社會發展無任何貢獻，吾三日自省其身，確係有當中智慧所在
今時今日大陸電話產業只可以算代工生產，高科技產業講緊最起碼係半導體，6G呢類具有前尖性嘅發展，真係真正突破到現有界限至係發展。
習草包獨裁，14億人都要學習草包思想，還要入腦、入魂、入神！。。。習共連什麽是買方市場都不懂，以爲靠洗腦，壓榨14億奴隸，就可以實現人類命運共同體、東升西降，主導世界秩序。。。有怎樣蠢的皇帝就有怎樣蠢的奴才。
我不確定 UA-cam 視頻中的專家是誰，但我對他們的說法持懷疑態度。誠然，中國是世界上最大的稀土生產國，但不是唯一的生產國。美國、澳大利亞和加拿大也生產稀土。此外，還有多家公司正致力於開發新的稀土資源。
取代中國成為世界領先的稀土生產國也確實需要一些時間。但是，我認為這不會花費“很長時間”，或者成本會“幾乎是無限的”。
美國已經採取了一些措施來減少對中國稀土的依賴。2019 年，特朗普政府簽署了一項行政命令，指示內政部製定一項增加國內稀土產量的計劃。拜登政府還表示支持增加國內稀土產量。
我相信自由世界有可能取代中國生產稀土。這將需要一些時間和精力，但這並非不可能。此外，替代中國生產稀土的成本很可能很高，但不太可能“近乎無限”。
以下是自由世界可以採取的一些步驟來取代中國的稀土生產：
增加國內稀土產量。
尋找新的稀土來源。
開發使用較少稀土的新技術。
回收稀土。
通過採取這些措施，自由世界可以減少對中國稀土的依賴，並保護自己免受供應中斷的影響。
No disrespect, 只会觉得
呢位佘博士係百分百小粉紅思維. 佢完全唔明白乜叫做国家(各先進国), 戰略部儲. 每個国家必有佢地自家生產戰略資源嘅方法, 不過好低调唔引起人注意咁解. 並不等如一定要中國. 现在只不過係take advantage of 中國可以任意破壞環境政策
離題！
真话无人听得入咖！ 听得出连主持人都无愿意听都呢啲说话！
所謂的加工是低技術的工業過程，老老實實，有邊樣中國技術是其他國家唔識的？你當佢是tsmc? 稀土又唔是大市場
平，只是平，唯一的優勢，
而且，依家中國並不便宜，佢地的成本每年都上升中
呢個故仔由2戰之後發生咗幾次，阿根庭，韓國，日本，邊個唔係有“人口紅利，人力成本，巨大優勢”？
唯一核心是，你有咩是人哋無嘅？日韓台，有輕，重，電子工業技術領先
中國有共產黨？
This guy has a very pro China stand.. Did he deliberately understate the combined powers of Western nations and determination..
那你可以换个角度看问题，何尝不是低估了东方集权国家阵营的综合力量和决心呢？
@@htsvdunm if what you said is true , The combined power of China is really that strong, Taiwan would have been invaded by China already given the proud character of your beloved leader Xi...