Why people form hierarchies

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 сер 2024
  • Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: • Nationalism Debate: Ya...
    Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
    - Noom: trynoom.com/lex
    - InsideTracker: insidetracker.... and use code Lex25 to get 25% off
    - SimpliSafe: simplisafe.com... and use code LEX to get a free security camera
    - ExpressVPN: expressvpn.com... and use code LexPod to get 3 months free
    - Blinkist: blinkist.com/lex and use code LEX to get 25% off premium
    GUEST BIO:
    Yaron Brook is an objectivist. Yoram Hazony is a national conservative. This is a conversation and debate about national conservatism vs individualism.
    PODCAST INFO:
    Podcast website: lexfridman.com...
    Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr
    Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
    RSS: lexfridman.com...
    Full episodes playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast
    Clips playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
    SOCIAL:
    - Twitter: / lexfridman
    - LinkedIn: / lexfridman
    - Facebook: / lexfridman
    - Instagram: / lexfridman
    - Medium: / lexfridman
    - Reddit: / lexfridman
    - Support on Patreon: / lexfridman

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @josef9988
    @josef9988 2 роки тому +19

    The Portuguese urge to say "PORTUGAL CARALHOOO" everytime we are slightly mentioned.

  • @larrythecableguy6384
    @larrythecableguy6384 2 роки тому +25

    Yo why is the portugal futeboll team in the thumbnail?

    • @darkgreenrifleman4871
      @darkgreenrifleman4871 2 роки тому +3

      Same question I had? Maybe because it’s a metaphor for a Hierarchy.Portugal definitely looks the part.

    • @larrythecableguy6384
      @larrythecableguy6384 2 роки тому

      @@darkgreenrifleman4871 i kinda get what you are saying, but how?

    • @darkgreenrifleman4871
      @darkgreenrifleman4871 2 роки тому +1

      @@larrythecableguy6384 As small as Portugal is, at one point they were one of the most influential Empires in the world 🌍. Influence on a world stage speaks to their ability to form hierarchical situations 🌎. Their futbol teams are more reflective of that physically and genealogicaly. Just a theory.

    • @angryquim7836
      @angryquim7836 2 роки тому +3

      Because Ronaldo is the man and everyone else knows it....

    • @larrythecableguy6384
      @larrythecableguy6384 2 роки тому

      @@angryquim7836 truee

  • @kaykizzil
    @kaykizzil 2 роки тому +8

    Siuuuuu

  • @igadixila
    @igadixila 2 роки тому +14

    PORTUGAAAAAAAAALLL!

  • @ThouguohT
    @ThouguohT 2 роки тому +3

    "Ewman Beans"

  • @smartbart80
    @smartbart80 2 роки тому

    The religious guy isn’t wrong but what he describes would apply to people who don’t change. Reality around us changes all the time, faster than ever, and I think liberals take that into account and see value in approaching the problem from a perspective of an individual since it’s more predictable.

  • @martingifford5415
    @martingifford5415 2 роки тому

    Both of these guys need to study spiral dynamics. It would sort out their thinking in one hour.

  • @alexhendrick8288
    @alexhendrick8288 2 роки тому

    Something else is the adversity to discussing the potential necessity for blood shed. .. Sometimes conflict breads rule changes and adaptation .

    • @Talleyhoooo
      @Talleyhoooo 2 роки тому

      Oh god, that might be the cringiest comment here. You’re not facing any adversity buddy as keyboard warrior buddy, calm down

  • @joekelly7505
    @joekelly7505 2 роки тому +3

    I just feel the whole argument "conservatives realize the emergent properties of xyz" is a straw man argument. If you distill the conservative POV in the USA (and potentially, conservative in general) politics, it's actually much more regressive and far less imaginative: conservatives are deeply concerned with in-group loyalty, to the very extent that the fringe element is willing to sacrifice themselves and their cherished elders to the pandemic. E.g. somewhere in that mix, group loyalty overrides, with a kind of outpouring of toxic mean-spiritedness, our long and trusted (and, now, obviously and sadly tenuous) relationship with science, rationality, and critical thinking -- all of which are the cornerstones of humanism and human enlightenment.
    In-group loyalty -- the hierarchies, the politics, the unreasonable kowtowing to a top dog on merit of arbitrary characteristics, i.e. charisma and entrenched power -- results from a series of evolved instincts that helped our simian ancestors survive for millions of years, but which are fundamentally at odds with our notion of ourselves as humans: creatures of reason and deep compassion and imagination. These instincts have been clearly and transparently manipulated by charlatans and lackeys of strong and quite often myopic leaders since recorded history.
    I suppose the "evolutionary traditionalists", a term I'm going to apply to Hazony, will say "why screw around with a good thing?" But clearly science is one of the most successful tools humans have developed to counteract the pernicious effects of instinctual bias and cognitive defects in our individual brains. And clearly, this desire to remain loyal to the big dog hierarchy is just one more cognitive defect hindering the rational human's emergence, something not to be celebrated but overcome.

  • @MyMrRoboto
    @MyMrRoboto 2 роки тому +2

    Damn it... Not first!

  • @Iam1297
    @Iam1297 2 роки тому +2

    pika pika

  • @eaf888
    @eaf888 2 роки тому

    🙌🙌🌈🌈🚀🚀