PreSonus Quantum USB Interfaces: Advanced Engineering & Versatile Connectivity for Any Studio

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 тра 2024
  • Shop PreSonus Quantum ES 2, ES 4, HD 2, and HD 8 USB-C audio interfaces 👉 sweetwater.sjv.io/PreSonus_Qu...
    With the new wave of Quantum interfaces, PreSonus merges their all-inclusive architecture with the lightning-fast processing of USB-C connectivity, delivering an array of audio interfaces that maximize performance and accommodate multitudes of recording configurations all without sacrificing precious studio real estate. Their ES 2, ES 4, HD 2, and HD 8 interfaces include dedicated instrument inputs that were codesigned by Fender and have been front mounted for the convenience of bassists and guitarists. Sweetwater’s Mitch Gallagher dives into the Quantum realm with a comprehensive overview of this cutting-edge series of interfaces. Check it out!
    Discover immersive audio, Dolby Atmos, and more with PreSonus Studio One 6.5 👉 • PreSonus Studio One 6....
    Subscribe and follow for the latest gear news and giveaways! 👉 / @sweetwater
    After you watch, visit Sweetwater.com today for all your music instrument and pro audio needs! 👉 sweetwater.sjv.io/shop
    Visit the DealZone for the best deals on demos, bundles, B-stock, and more 👉 sweetwater.sjv.io/Dealzone_Demos
    Shop used gear 👉 sweetwater.sjv.io/Gear-Exchange
    The cameras powering Sweetwater 👉 • The Cameras Powering S...
    For more from Sweetwater, follow us:
    Facebook: / sweetwater
    Twitter: / sweetwatersound
    Instagram: / sweetwatersound
    TikTok: / sweetwatersound
    #Sweetwater #PreSonus #Quantum #Studio #AudioInterface #MitchGallagher

КОМЕНТАРІ • 102

  • @sweetwater
    @sweetwater  24 дні тому +7

    Which PreSonus Quantum USB-C audio interface has piqued your interest? Tell us in the comments how you’d use it with your studio setup, and be sure to stop by Sweetwater to check out the full PreSonus Quantum series 👉 sweetwater.sjv.io/PreSonus_Quantum

    • @n0nyabznss
      @n0nyabznss 24 дні тому

      You guys should drop Presonus. Their stuff is junk and made in China. Presonus offers no support for their hardware once the warranty expires and will never even share service manuals for their hardware should they require service.

    • @spilltheteawithshe1904
      @spilltheteawithshe1904 19 днів тому

      HD 8 is 🔥

  • @ChrstnSmrvllMsc
    @ChrstnSmrvllMsc 24 дні тому +32

    PreSonus owes a bit of a debt to Audient here, I'd say, but still, these seem like probably the best interfaces they've ever released, and it's cool to see Studio One people getting some handy product integration. And 75dB of gain!? flat within .2dB from 20-20!? for $230!? Impressive. Can't wait to hear Julian Krause's thoughts! 😄

    • @rjb7569
      @rjb7569 23 дні тому +3

      Julian's reviews seemed to have slowed a bit. Would certainly like to see him review the two HD models but he'll probably do the lower end models.

    • @tinychamberz
      @tinychamberz 23 дні тому +2

      I recently tried a audient id24 and my bass sounded way worse than it does on my old studio 6/8 by presonus. I was really impressed with the presonus.

    • @bighousemusic628
      @bighousemusic628 23 дні тому

      PRESONUS IS AND ALWAYS BE HD I HAVE A STUDIO 68 ASWELL AND A ID 14 MK2 AND THE PRESONUS STILL ROCKS ONLYTHING AUDIENT SOUNDS BIGGER@@tinychamberz

    • @ryanshook8284
      @ryanshook8284 23 дні тому +1

      the presonus quantum 8 unit is a total rip of Apogee's old design for the ensemble

    • @TheRickdoggie
      @TheRickdoggie 23 дні тому

      @@ryanshook8284 at about half the price

  • @tramer76
    @tramer76 17 днів тому +2

    Mitch is the best demo dude in the business!

  • @thaexception3406
    @thaexception3406 24 дні тому +10

    Nice with the Studio One DAW integration.

  • @presonus
    @presonus 23 дні тому +9

    💙 Wonderful overview of the new Quantum audio interfaces. Thank you!

    • @RP14_Music
      @RP14_Music 22 дні тому +1

      with the autogain does this adjust throughout performances or is it a static level?

  • @joeydego2
    @joeydego2 23 дні тому +2

    The rack mount one looks cool and I like the S1 integration.

  • @Book-bz8ns
    @Book-bz8ns 24 дні тому +4

    Im late to the interface party. So this is a bit of education for me. Thanks👍

  • @AkVellie
    @AkVellie 3 дні тому

    Es4 two headphones puts 👍👍 I’m getting one plus the easy gain stage

  • @elijahmant2855
    @elijahmant2855 24 дні тому +2

    Hi, Mitch. I hope you are good. Thanks as usual for your informative and up to date products releases.

  • @jorgaridya7085
    @jorgaridya7085 15 днів тому +1

    Ok, this is what I don't like about Presonus marketing. Everyone saying connection is Type C. Type C is the form factor of the connectors not the speed. The old Quantum where Thunderbolts which is also Type C. The 1824C are also Type C. Both of them have different speed 1 was USB 2 speed, the other one thunderbolt. Presonus won't said in the description which speed we are getting when buying this new one. Same as what they did with 1824C release.That is misleading because someone can buy one of this new devices thinking is thunderbolt or USB3.2.

  • @subhajitsarkar4432
    @subhajitsarkar4432 24 дні тому +9

    PreSonus quietly released this interfaces wow

  • @coffeehigh420
    @coffeehigh420 11 днів тому +1

    I'm looking for a new interface with 24 tracks of input via optical (ADAT) in / out. Please help. I'd get this but unfortunately for me, this has up to 16 adat / optical in/out. I'm trying to replace my 10+ year old workflow.

  • @jmlfl0ydrose
    @jmlfl0ydrose 23 дні тому

    Mitch is great. Are there an videos out there on how to automate guitar pedal patch changes using studio one? Thanks

  • @gastonsantos258
    @gastonsantos258 24 дні тому +1

    those are beautiful interfaces.

  • @eddysel10
    @eddysel10 23 дні тому

    Congrats to presonus, great interfaces. Their features look a lot like the Audient Evo 16.

  • @stevendierkes6028
    @stevendierkes6028 24 дні тому +1

    Love those lights 😮

    • @boutstaxx
      @boutstaxx 23 дні тому

      U know it’s serious when Mitch does demos

  • @1KMPLX
    @1KMPLX 23 дні тому +1

    I’ll keep my eye out for a Quantum 4848 update. That’s when I’ll get excited.

    • @1KMPLX
      @1KMPLX 23 дні тому

      But when we use things like the 4848 we are often using outboard gear like plugins. That means we want super low latency. Can you do this with usb to the same degree? Maybe offer the 4848’s with a TB option?

  • @experimentalme7438
    @experimentalme7438 23 дні тому

    Does it really use quantum computing ?... phenomenal

  • @bharumusic
    @bharumusic 23 дні тому +2

    I wish they implemented AVB I/O, atleast for the HD series 😩

  • @frankifran5335
    @frankifran5335 23 дні тому

    Are the guitar and the combo inputs of the HD2 independent? I want something to run stereo guitars and at least a microphone at the same time for my class. I was thinking on getting the EVO 16 but the HD2 really caught my attention, which one do u recommend? (Having in mind I need at least 3 independent inputs) Thanks beforehand :)

    • @sweetwater
      @sweetwater  23 дні тому

      Good question, frankifran5335! Unfortunately, using one of the inputs on the front will defeat the input on the back. If you do not need the ADAT expansion though, you could look at the Quantum ES4. This has the two inputs on the front and 4 mic pres on the back. So you would be able to run 2 mics and 2 guitars at once! Same preamps as the HD2 and same guitar inputs as the HD2, so no loss in quality, just less I/O overall.
      Let me know if you have further questions!
      Drake Sobehrad, Sweetwater Sales Engineer, (800)-222-4700 ext. 3271, drake_sobehrad@sweetwater.com

  • @levijessegonzalez3629
    @levijessegonzalez3629 17 днів тому

    How Do these mic pres on the HD series compare to Focusrite Clarrett+ pres?

  • @briandavis812
    @briandavis812 24 дні тому +3

    Boo for the mini MIDI jacks.

  • @rjb7569
    @rjb7569 23 дні тому +1

    Concerning the pres...is the 48 phantom controllable individually for each pre? (Didn't understand you're "discrete" comment.)
    Edit: I think I did see each channel's phanthom can be set in software.
    Also, are any of the HD pres bypassable, as with the MOTU 828 where compressors can be inserted on the first two channels, bypassing the converters? Thanks.

    • @likethehotels
      @likethehotels 22 дні тому

      Individual phantom power control per input.

    • @rjb7569
      @rjb7569 22 дні тому

      @@likethehotels
      Many thanks!

    • @lilturtlegaming1923
      @lilturtlegaming1923 20 днів тому

      @@rjb7569did you find out if the pre’s are bypassable?

  • @VAFlash
    @VAFlash 24 дні тому +5

    Quantum in the past has indicated low latency because of Thunderbolt. What are the roundtrip latency numbers for these USB 2.0 interfaces?

    • @gitpho
      @gitpho 23 дні тому +2

      ~3 ms at 192 kHz with a 64-sample buffer. The Quantum 2626, for comparison, has an RTL of

    • @bharumusic
      @bharumusic 23 дні тому +1

      @@gitphodamn.. feels like a downgrade in terms of RTL 🤔

    • @777agnbeats
      @777agnbeats 23 дні тому +1

      We are going to wait to see other reviews. The original quantum did not have monitoring dsp though. The HDs seems to have. Hope to see ~5ms at 48Khz, 64 samples.

    • @gitpho
      @gitpho 23 дні тому +1

      @@777agnbeats PreSonus says 48 kHz with a 32-sample buffer will provide ~4 ms RTL. 64 samples would be >5 ms for sure.

    • @rjb7569
      @rjb7569 23 дні тому

      ​@@gitpho
      Any chance directing us to the more involved tech specs? I can't find anything yet.

  • @THE.MICHAEL.ANGELO
    @THE.MICHAEL.ANGELO 23 дні тому

    Hmmm, I wonder how the ES 2 and 4, even the HD 2 would work as a standalone audio interface with the MPC Key37 Standalone. The ES Series seems to be class compliant (w/out the use of an external power supply), however the HD 2 does look like it as well but with the need for a power supply.

  • @ianmunn
    @ianmunn 21 день тому +1

    Can the preamps be bypassed, to connect external pre's?

    • @OscarDanielGarza
      @OscarDanielGarza 20 днів тому

      Yes, you plug into the line level input (1/4-inch) of the combo jack. It bypasses the pre, but also provides a little digital trim (+ or - 12 dB)

  • @Kevinschart
    @Kevinschart 22 дні тому

    Who's writing and maintaining the drivers? Is the audio control going to break as soon as mac updates the OS? I'm not going down that road again with presonus

    • @TheRickdoggie
      @TheRickdoggie 22 дні тому +1

      That's a great question. And the answer is that the new custom driver was designed in conjunction with Apple using the Driver Kit extension, not a kernel hack. So it's going to be supported going forward by Apple.

  • @michaelyolch79
    @michaelyolch79 23 дні тому

    Loooove me some Presonus!

  • @emptysetowl9715
    @emptysetowl9715 19 днів тому

    I am interested in how this 32 bit floating point and how or if it matter with connecting an ADAT device that is at 24 bit. I would think that you could only use 32 bit floating point with just the 8 channels it comes with. Could someone explain?

    • @AGVersace100
      @AGVersace100 19 днів тому

      Of course it will be so. Once the signal hits the converter what's done is done.

  • @MansurEvindar
    @MansurEvindar 23 дні тому +4

    Hi 😊 Can someone compare the new Presonus interfaces/preamps ES and HD series with Audient ID and UAD Apollo series? Thanks 🙏 @AudientWorld @UAudio @PreSonus

  • @johnlackner1193
    @johnlackner1193 15 днів тому

    Are these interfaces class compliant? Meaning, it is not necessary to install a proprietary PC driver.

    • @sweetwater
      @sweetwater  12 днів тому +1

      Hello, johnlackner1193! Yes, they are class compliant and will plug and play. If you want a deeper level of control though I do recommend installing the Presonus Universal Control app.
      Give us a shout and we can discuss in more depth! Thanks for the interest!
      James Masterson, Sweetwater Sales Engineer, (800) 222-4700 ext. 1641, james_masterson@sweetwater.com

  • @KeshaProduce
    @KeshaProduce 22 дні тому

    Me hubiera gustado una entrada insert en la línea HD 😅

  • @Grade8shearpin42
    @Grade8shearpin42 22 дні тому +1

    Let me know when the quantum4848 comes back

  • @dalast5289
    @dalast5289 20 днів тому

    As a Presonus user, would've been even better if they used or kept their revelator software approach with dsp (just a preference) using FatChannel but with support of the rest of their emulations or firmware updates...

  • @Mahdi_ddA
    @Mahdi_ddA 22 дні тому

    Awesome cool video really Like always ❤❤I love USA and sweetwater, i love film like all summers end and Sandlot ❤❤❤im grew with your music and your songs i love you, i love songs like make it with you Nate smith feat the war and the treaty, 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🌟🌟i beilive in you when i was born in 2001 in 18 april i think its a sign i love USA ❤❤❤😊My name is mahdi and im 23 years old i live in italy you are beautiful People really i love USA ❤❤🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🎸🌞😊😊Im listen this video every day its on reapet on my Phone ❤❤really 😊😊

  • @rootscape7580
    @rootscape7580 3 дні тому

    Where is DSP again? Fender are you kidding?

  • @andrewgilman8835
    @andrewgilman8835 24 дні тому +3

    Cool stuff, but Quantum used to mean Thunderbolt. Now it's USB2 via USB-C? That's a bummer. Is no one trying to compete with UA interfaces anymore?

    • @TheRickdoggie
      @TheRickdoggie 24 дні тому

      PreSonus still makes the Thunderbolt Quantum 2626 which is the fastest latency thunderbolt interface at $699 pricepoint. The new ones are ultra low latency USB. Still not as fast as TB, but way faster than most competitive USB interfaces.

    • @FKA_Skull
      @FKA_Skull 24 дні тому +2

      There’s a number companies competing and making better products than UA in the same price range, they just don’t have well known names behind them. UA’s interface line has been stagnant for years and many better options exist at this time.

    • @bulletheadbeatz2296
      @bulletheadbeatz2296 23 дні тому +3

      RME has proved that Thunderbolt isn't necessary for low latency audio. I just sold my UA X8P and bought RME's Fireface UFX iii and amazing is an understatement

    • @gitpho
      @gitpho 23 дні тому +2

      @@bulletheadbeatz2296​​⁠this is true. Unfortunately, though, these new Quantum interfaces have a round-trip latency of ~3 ms at 192 kHz with a 64-sample buffer-settings at which the Quantum 2626 had an RTL of

    • @dennvetta5480
      @dennvetta5480 23 дні тому

      @@TheRickdoggie Quantum 2626 is gone form their website under the Interface pulldown

  • @philbrown102
    @philbrown102 22 дні тому

    I hope that they hold up over time. Usually, when their products break, they give you a terrible time and blame you for everything possible before reluctantly offering to repair the unit at your own expense. Presonus makes some cool and good sounding gear, but their customer suppport is terrible. If they really believed in the quality of their products their warrantees would cover replacing their units when a customer has a problem without giving them a hard time.

  • @FKA_Skull
    @FKA_Skull 24 дні тому +1

    I owned a PreSonus Firestudio, it went bad and I sent it in for repair. It went bad again and I opened it up and fixed it myself. It went bad again, so I bought their USB version. It lasted a while but it too went bad. I bought the newer USB-C version. I bought an extended warranty this time. A channel went bad so I sent it in for repair but they couldn’t fix it and paid me out for the value of the unit. I’m a Focusrite guy now for the time being.

    • @vegadeth
      @vegadeth 22 дні тому

      Weird. I’ve owned 4 different interfaces from them and only had one issue which was fixed. Currently running a Quantum 2626 with added ADAT and zero issues.
      Edit- I don’t see any reason for me to get this. It seems like a side-grade rather than an upgrade

    • @FKA_Skull
      @FKA_Skull 22 дні тому

      @@vegadeth I liked the products but they all had reliability issues, and they were always rack mounted and kept in pristine condition, they never faced any abuse.

  • @Afterworkinhours
    @Afterworkinhours 23 дні тому +2

    I’ll never buy another Presonus, they discontinued the Quantum 4848 and will not function with the latest IOS. It was near impossible to communicate with customer service, when I finally was able to speak with a rep it was “sorry to hear that”
    Terrible customer support, I now have a useless piece of gear that cost well over $1000. By way of comparison my Focusrite Clarett 8prex , which is discontinued, works just fine with my Mac Studio.

  • @fonqstarr3636
    @fonqstarr3636 10 днів тому

    Wya Julian.

  • @trippypages7309
    @trippypages7309 23 дні тому +2

    I HATE HATE HATE usbC as power supply. So fragile and small, and feels like it is not making full contact. At least the other two have another type of power supply.

    • @TheOneMonk
      @TheOneMonk 21 день тому +1

      I agree. Unplugs so easily.

  • @nathanreddent2427
    @nathanreddent2427 23 дні тому

    Wait so the interfaces don’t come with studio one artist anymore???
    GD Fender already ruining a great company.

  • @ivanmilicevicmusic
    @ivanmilicevicmusic 24 дні тому

    The build quality of their interfaces is rooling down. It's all plastic.
    That's the thing that's bothering me with these new series.

    • @DaveMcCall
      @DaveMcCall 24 дні тому

      These are all metal in their case/chassis construction and significantly heavier than I was expecting them to be. I was very impressed with the build quality.

    • @ivanmilicevicmusic
      @ivanmilicevicmusic 24 дні тому

      ​@@DaveMcCall Es 2, and Es 4 really doesn't look like it's made out of metal, while Hd does...

    • @TheRickdoggie
      @TheRickdoggie 24 дні тому +2

      Both ES and HD are all metal chassis. No plastic.

    • @ivanmilicevicmusic
      @ivanmilicevicmusic 24 дні тому

      @@TheRickdoggie Nope bro, pretty sure this is plastic.

    • @klownaround5464
      @klownaround5464 22 дні тому

      The knobs and buttons LQQK PLASTICKY and on another video the bloggers touch of the knob i noticed it moved off center like it’s CHEAP not sturdy just saying

  • @stephenfleming8030
    @stephenfleming8030 24 дні тому +1

    Ehhhh...Are presonus just buying Audient stuff and re-badging it? That's what this looks like...

    • @TheRickdoggie
      @TheRickdoggie 24 дні тому +2

      The Audient Evo16 has 58dB of gain on the preamp. The Quantum's are all 75dB. Plus the HD Series have reamp outputs. Nope, these are definitely not rebadged Audients.

    • @stephenfleming8030
      @stephenfleming8030 24 дні тому

      @@TheRickdoggie Cosmetically and functionally they are very similar. The extra mic gain is useful only if it's usable...I may be wrong, but I am unaware of any smd opamp designs (and this is definitely smd at this price point) that offer 75dB of 'useable' gain. I guess we'll see how that pans out. Maybe they have something proprietary inside?
      Presonus round trip latency is insanely low. AFAIK It's sub millisecond. That's a big deal for some buyers, so between the older Quantum units and these new ones, there's something for everyone.
      Just watching PLAP review on these...should be interesting!

    • @joesalyers
      @joesalyers 24 дні тому +2

      @@stephenfleming8030 Not on these they are USB 2 not thunderbolt. So at 128 buffer at 48K in Logic the HD8 will be 10.8 milliseconds while the Quantum 2626 Thunderbolt Interface is 5.6 milliseconds at 128 buffer so its twice higher latency on these new interfaces compared to the older version. Why Presonus called these Quantum is weird.

    • @stephenfleming8030
      @stephenfleming8030 23 дні тому +1

      @@joesalyers Oh, I thought the thunderbolt versions were way faster than that? I must be confusing them with something else?

    • @joesalyers
      @joesalyers 23 дні тому

      @@stephenfleming8030 If you set the Thunderbolt quantum version to 192K you can get below 1 milisecond with a 64 buffer but that isn't realistic to use. But at 128 buffer at 96K the roundtrip latency will be about 2-2.3 milliseconds and you can mix a full 100 track song and overdubs late n the mixing stage with no problems. Whatever a USB interface's latency is say 5 milliseconds, using the same buffer and sampling rate a thunderbolt interface will cut it in half with the same settings. So from 5 milliseconds on USB to 2.5 on Thunderbolt. It has to do with the way USB delivers audio packets compared to Thunderbolt which is PCI over a copper cable. So I think Presonus should not have used the Quantum branding its a little misleading. Cheers!

  • @GuareschiGuillermo
    @GuareschiGuillermo 23 дні тому

    If the quantum has 8 mic inputs, then is not a professional device, we cannot use a nice outboard mic preamp because the input will has to go through the mic preamp of the presonus, sounding then like...

    • @OscarDanielGarza
      @OscarDanielGarza 20 днів тому +1

      The 1/4-inch input of the combo jack bypasses the mic pre. There is also + or - 12 dB of digital trim when you bypass the pre with a line level device.

  • @allkindsofthings673
    @allkindsofthings673 20 днів тому

    Quantum is now downgraded to StudioLive. No thunderbolt....no thanks

  • @Bigjunk9999
    @Bigjunk9999 23 дні тому +2

    Round trip latency? 64 sample buffer 48KHz

    • @guitarfreak2105
      @guitarfreak2105 23 дні тому +4

      Not 1.8ms like the Thunderbolt Quantum stuff.
      Kind of misleading to put Quantum on USB products when it’s only been used for Thunderbolt interfaces in the past.

    • @OscarDanielGarza
      @OscarDanielGarza 20 днів тому

      DAW reports about 4 ms at 32 sample / 48 kHz and about 3 ms 32 sample / 96 kHz. Need to check 64 samples and hopefully others will post their own measurements soon.