Handheld vs Shoulder Rig vs Flycam - Stabilization Comparison
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 вер 2024
- Stabilization comparison test with Sony a6000 + Sony 18-105mm F4 G OSS.
Handheld footage vs Shoulder Rig Filmcity FC-03 vs Flycam Nano DSLR-HD.
WEB: brvideo.cz
FACEBOOK: / brvideocz
INSTAGRAM: / brvideocz
KONTAKT: 720 678 211 | info@brvideo.cz
Great comparison! The flycam footage really does look like it's from a 3-axis gimbal when compared to the handheld and shoulder rig.
Great test thank you!
It’s incredible
Thank you so much.
You use flycam and shoulder rigs to two different kind of shots.
Yes I do
BR video meant in general
Great Video! What focal length did you use on the flycam and did you stabilize a bit in post?
Thanks, I used 18mm (x 1.5 crop factor). No it isn't stabilized in post, only lens OSS stabilization was used.
@@brvideo4099 The OSS stabilisation actually messed up the shouldercam shot.
flycam wins
For walking shots, sure.
Flycam wins Yes it does
The complacency in the comments is amazing. I dislike all three shots. The jerkiness in the footage is horrendous.
I think the idea here was to NOT add any assistance to the stabilization to show what the equipment is doing un aided by not walking in a specific way etc. For me the goal isn't how smooth I can get the shot although smoothness is a factor no one wants jarring movement, but it's fatigue that is the killer for me. I want a system that I can use for long periods of time and a gimbal on it's own gets very heavy very fast.
hey you need better audio