The Answer Is A BEAUTIFUL Mathematical Constant...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2025
  • Hope everyone enjoyed! Please comment with any questions or suggestions for new topics, and as always, subscribe to stay updated.
    ~ Thanks for watching!
    Love to Roshan for the question.
    I want to say a final thank you for all the support - 5k subscribers is insane and I'm so grateful to everyone!
    #maths #mathematics #integrals #gamma #gammafunction #eulermascheroni #entrance #university #Oxford #Cambridge #JEE #problemsolving #taylor #maclaurin #gaussian #gauss #statistics #whoknew #fascinating #functions #euler #funproblems #proofs #functions #physics #sums #series #limits #whiteboard #math505 #blackpenredpen #integral #trig #trigonometry

КОМЕНТАРІ • 29

  • @whiteboarddude3566
    @whiteboarddude3566 Місяць тому +6

    I appreciate you taking these integrals which sometimes seem random and then equating them to more famous mathematical creatures. It's also really great to follow along, work on the integral for a bit, then go back to the video to find you have taken the same step. Congratulations for 5000 subscribers. You've earned them : )

    • @OscgrMaths
      @OscgrMaths  Місяць тому +1

      Thanks so much! I'm really glad you enjoyed.

  • @TheSourovAqib
    @TheSourovAqib 23 дні тому +3

    Ah the Euler Macaroni constant 🤌

  • @np2oc-Hasanul
    @np2oc-Hasanul 15 днів тому +1

    Hi I have learnt so much from your videos
    I wanted to put in a kind video request for cool trig identities if you arent too busy
    e.g. I learnt from you the arctan(x) + arctan(x^-1) = pi/2 and this was a GAME CHANGER for me learning new techniques for oblique collisions in further mechanics!!!!
    thanks so much : )

  • @nirjharchaudhuri6484
    @nirjharchaudhuri6484 Місяць тому +4

    Great integral to wrap up the series! Congrats on 5k!!

    • @OscgrMaths
      @OscgrMaths  Місяць тому

      Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it.

  • @ruaidhridoylelynch5522
    @ruaidhridoylelynch5522 Місяць тому +3

    Love your videos, they are very helpful to me 🥰

    • @OscgrMaths
      @OscgrMaths  Місяць тому

      Thanks! I'm really glad you like them.

  • @artemetra3262
    @artemetra3262 Місяць тому +2

    this is exactly how i did it, down to the variable names 😆 nice problem!

    • @OscgrMaths
      @OscgrMaths  Місяць тому

      Nice!! Great minds think alike 😁.

  • @maxvangulik1988
    @maxvangulik1988 Місяць тому +1

    for a second there, i thought this was a product integral because dx is in the exponent in the thumbnail

  • @debtanaysarkar9744
    @debtanaysarkar9744 Місяць тому +2

    Evaluate Sum{r=2 to ∞} (r(choose)2/(r+1)!)
    I found it really cool

    • @OscgrMaths
      @OscgrMaths  Місяць тому +1

      Wow! That was a great question. Is it 1/2(e-2)?

    • @debtanaysarkar9744
      @debtanaysarkar9744 Місяць тому +1

      @OscgrMaths Yesss

    • @alphazero339
      @alphazero339 Місяць тому

      Is there easier way than using eˣ taylor expansion and integrating x²eˣ to get the 1/(n+3) factor?

    • @debtanaysarkar9744
      @debtanaysarkar9744 Місяць тому +1

      @alphazero339 Idk, maybe there is, I know 2 ways of solving it, both involving the Taylor series

  • @peshepard412
    @peshepard412 Місяць тому +2

    I wish you had a bigger board.

  • @jcfgykjtdk
    @jcfgykjtdk Місяць тому +1

    Very clean

  • @Swybryd-Nation
    @Swybryd-Nation Місяць тому

    Great job.
    Btw, besides Feynman Techbique, How would you tackle Achmed’s Integral?

  • @zlodevil426
    @zlodevil426 Місяць тому +1

    Bro got 5000 subs but not 5000 square millimeters on his board

  • @hathouses
    @hathouses Місяць тому +1

    So, how does taking the derivative of an integral in respect to a different variable work? Like, is there a nice way to work it out, in general? Since in this you used the digamma to evaluate it.

    • @alphazero339
      @alphazero339 Місяць тому +1

      For taking derivative with respect to x of integral which contains x (either as bound or inside the integrand) google "Leibniz integral rule"

    • @OscgrMaths
      @OscgrMaths  Місяць тому

      Differentiation under the integral sign is a tricky one. If the bounds are constants then you can just take the partial derivative of the integrand, but if not it's much harder. Take a look at Leibniz's rule for differentiation under the integral sign for more on that. Typically differentiating the integral and then evaluating it is what you do when using Feynman's trick so there's some great examples of it in videos that use that. Hope this helps and thanks for the comment!

  • @maxvangulik1988
    @maxvangulik1988 Місяць тому +1

    t=tan(x)
    I=int[-♾️,♾️](te^t•e^-e^t)dt
    s=e^t
    ds=e^t•dt
    I=int[0,♾️](ln(s)e^-s)ds
    I=Ř'(1)=-ř