BFO, seems to be an expansion of Braun & Clarke's thematic analysis ( or vise versa as chronologically is the case). Enjoying he archives located at Buffalo University & here on You Tube. Best!
Really enjoyed your lecture on ontology best practices! For context, I've spent over a decade as a Vice President in risk management at a Singapore financial institution. However, I have combined this with system development expertise (I can code). This unique blend is what fuels my current project: adopting an ontology-powered solution for strong AI in the workplace. This approach will be groundbreaking as it draws from the best practises from corporate life and applies it in an academic setting. On a lighter note, I'm also a Manchester alum! I lived in Whitworth Park back when United won the treble and City got relegated. Looking forward to diving into your book
It is a pity that Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) is an ISO standard. Standards that are developed with the support of taxpayer money should be open access.
BFO 2020, which is the relevant version of BFO, is fully in the public domain. See ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_2020 For those engaged in the creation of new standards, ISO/IEC 21838 parts 1 and 2 are also available. See instructions at the same link.
A hilariously naive and buffoonish comment. Stop using the Internet immediately. You obviously have no idea where it came from or how it works. You should be ashamed.
@@rdgorbunov Also, what a weak pathetic response to an ethical question. If we always resort to worse tactics out of fear of what the "enemy" will do, the world would have ended in nuclear holocaust already.
Even better than the class you allowed me to audit. Thanks for the continuing development and good success with adding energy.
Really helpful and comprehensive talk. Cheers
BRAVO! BRAVO
BFO, seems to be an expansion of Braun & Clarke's thematic analysis ( or vise versa as chronologically is the case). Enjoying he archives located at Buffalo University & here on You Tube. Best!
Are the slides for this available somewhere?
Really enjoyed your lecture on ontology best practices!
For context, I've spent over a decade as a Vice President in risk management at a Singapore financial institution. However, I have combined this with system development expertise (I can code).
This unique blend is what fuels my current project: adopting an ontology-powered solution for strong AI in the workplace. This approach will be groundbreaking as it draws from the best practises from corporate life and applies it in an academic setting.
On a lighter note, I'm also a Manchester alum! I lived in Whitworth Park back when United won the treble and City got relegated.
Looking forward to diving into your book
Can i get the presentation of this video??
It is a pity that Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) is an ISO standard. Standards that are developed with the support of taxpayer money should be open access.
BFO 2020, which is the relevant version of BFO, is fully in the public domain. See ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_2020
For those engaged in the creation of new standards, ISO/IEC 21838 parts 1 and 2 are also available. See instructions at the same link.
@@BarrySmithOntology Thank you. I will also bookmark the ncor wiki.
Extremely unethical to assist the us or any military or intelligence agencies use of these technologies....
You should be ashamed
A hilariously naive and buffoonish comment. Stop using the Internet immediately. You obviously have no idea where it came from or how it works. You should be ashamed.
@@silversharter yall are wack as hell.
@@robsan5410 Of course let's not work on military so Russia can invade your country and kill all your people. Is it what you want?
@@rdgorbunov lmao the russians are not itching to overthrow the us government. Go back to the 1950s pls with your war mongering.
@@rdgorbunov Also, what a weak pathetic response to an ethical question. If we always resort to worse tactics out of fear of what the "enemy" will do, the world would have ended in nuclear holocaust already.
“It didn’t work” - first red flag. “But I still believe in it” - the part where you switch off this video
too bad as scientific discovery is iterative in nature and as such, we encounter many "fails" until we hit the pass. Respectfully my opinion. Cheers!