Supreme Court Strikes Down NY Gun Restrictions & Chicago Police Ban Foot Chases | The Daily Show
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 чер 2024
- The Supreme Court strikes down a New York gun law restricting concealed carry, the Chicago police department will no longer chase people down over minor offenses, and railway workers in Britain are striking over pay and job security. #DailyShow #Comedy
Subscribe to The Daily Show:
/ @thedailyshow
Follow The Daily Show:
Twitter: / thedailyshow
Facebook: / thedailyshow
Instagram: / thedailyshow
Stream full episodes of The Daily Show on Paramount+: www.paramountplus.com/?ftag=PP...
Follow Comedy Central:
Twitter: / comedycentral
Facebook: / comedycentral
Instagram: / comedycentral
About The Daily Show:
Trevor Noah and The Daily Show correspondents tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and pop culture.
The Daily Show with Trevor Noah airs weeknights at 11/10c on Comedy Central. - Комедії
The train strike in the UK reminds me of the story where Japanese bus drivers went on strike but they still drove their routes. They just let the commuters/riders ride for free. That way the people who relied on the buses to get to school/work weren't inconvenienced but the bosses and CEOs weren't making anything.
I LIKE that idea. Hurt the investor class, NOT the people that die from their greed.
That is ABSOLUTELY (100x) brilliant. Amazing.
In the U.S. the driver would then be charged with stealing from the company. :)
@@justintyme2451 I wouldn't doubt it.
It's easier to do when you're the only employee in the vehicle, compared to a train that has to stop at multiple stations
Normal Ppl: "we cannot continue to survive on the pay we were making a decade ago."
Corporate Overlords enjoying raises and salaries at record levels: "we cannot find ppl to work, ppl are lazy"
🎯🎯🎯
So sad.
🚩🚩Wealth Gap Cheatcode: Flood Misinformation to UNEDUCATED ➕ MAKE DESPERATE MASSES OF PEOPLE ➕ Guns🚩🚩
It's sad that people are being progressively made poor in the richest country in the world.
I believe both are true. My husband job pays well but people don’t show up, they are constantly calling out.
Train workers: we are essential, we should be paid as if we are essential. We would like to live on a paycheck, not struggle and survive barely through paychecks.
Bosses: *reciting same rhetoric for 10 years* if you don't like it, don't work.
Railway workers: *go on strike, crippling the country*
Bosses: *surprised pikachu face*
we live in capitalmerica..its never gonna get better.
"If I could turn back time" ....
SCOTUS : - Hold my beer.
And they made it.
Serious problems with US overall.
The court hit hard this week, first striking NY gun control and now overturning Roe v Wade.
The ny gun law wasn't right.
@@taylorbug9 exactly it’s bs to only allow people to get a carry license if they are essentially a special case they need to issue it to anyone who is legally allowed
as for Roe v. Wade, it should be up to the citizens of each state to decide and not the Federal government. That is what was overturned. It's been handed back to the people and that is exactly what the Constitution states. So the outrage over Roe v. Wade doesn't make much sense either. The Federal government needs to play less of a role in peoples lives, not more.
@@davidperras5741 What's interesting to think about is that the ruling fails your own logic....
Government will be much MORE involved in women's lives after striking down Roe v. Wade. They will be putting women in prison. Conducting investigations of women. Etc.
The government will be much more involved in women's lives due to this ruling.
It fits, once you relax the gun laws even more you need to ban abortions in order to make up for the losses.
Also, does Boris not get what a strike is? The whole point is that it's inconvenient in order to force action.
You'd need a brain for that.
USAmericans should take note and plot some strikes also. a national strike would get a lot done
Strikes only became popular when unions became popular.
kinda think there’s a lot that Boris doesn’t get 🙄
They pretend not to know. They know they’re supposed to be the bad guys here, they just know better than to say that part out loud.
It's not fair for somebody to work a full-time job but not be able to make ends meet, especially when your bosses make millions in profits. If you can't afford to live then what's even the point of working? You only work so that you can live. That's why it's called "making a living, right". SO TRUE
how is it not fair? It’s not like people are forced to work there they can always get a different better paying job or start their own business and pay people higher wages, probably won’t be in business long though
@@riddlesjackstorm9003 It isn't fair if your employer can hire illegal workers or desperate immigrants who lower the wage standard and increase competition for jobs at any pay scale, making it harder for legitimate employees to make a living, while the employer stuffs the profit in his/ her pocket.
@@justintyme2451 affirmative action isn’t fair either but it’s still there, i don’t agree with hiring illegals either but it’s just like affirmative action to me
@@riddlesjackstorm9003 It's probably not that easy to get a bettet paying job whenever you feel like it, or to get the funds to start your own company when you're not even getting enough pay to live on. It can also be hard to afford loans to study to get a higher prestige job.
If only a few companies gave their employes unlivable wages, those comapnies would perhaps eventually die out if people were able to find other, better employment. If it's the norm to pay such low salaries, you don't really have many options.
I would also say that it's unfair to expect there to be people who provide us with certain services in society, but then also say that these people, who work full time, don't deserve a pay they can live on. Then you are relying on there being people to exploit. For example: why should the person who makes food for others not deserve to eat as well? Or should we all "get better jobs" and no one eats again?
@@formaldehyde3864 why can’t they go look for other jobs? No one is being forced to work at those places and you don’t need a lot of money to start your own business, you expect employers to pay for their employees lifestyles, nobody would have jobs if that’s the case
Oh, you "need" the train workers?
Then pay them like you need them.
Right? I bet the UK is angry at the island countries that no longer wish to be ruled by them. Meaning no more taking their money to line their pockets.
When an adult shows up to work every day, and performs a service - which hundreds, and maybe thousands of people enjoy the benefits thereof - he or she should be paid a wage that allows them to enjoy the glorious daily fruits of living in a free and prosperous nation.
Also the Supreme Court: “Give us more security and keep peaceful protests away from us.”
They didn't say anything about Violent Mobs.
JOE BIDEN CHEAT SHEETS: YOU take your seat 💺 😉😀😄🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 This is what you get when you order a president by Mail 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 AMERICA IS A LAUGHING STICK ALL OVER THE WORLD 😂
Liberals: Defund the Police! We dont need police to protect the public. They act too impulsively
Also liberals (after a school shooting): Our police act too slowly and were cowardly. Why are they doing this?
@@MajorHenryL.
Dude, if we can't trust police to do the right thing, then we SHOULD pay them less. Congrats, you demonized simple logic.
Peaceful huh?
Yeah, the Supreme Court was like you have a problem with this decision.
Just wait what we have planned for tomorrow
Right..SCOTUS "Hold my Beer"
@@amandarogers12 Justice "Hold My Beer" Kavanaugh!
NYC Gun violence is all ILLEGAL GUNS!!
I’d be scared of what they have planned for tomorrow they’ll probably bring back slavery they already brought back involuntary servitude since neither one is in the 13th amendment according to the Supreme Court Justices. And Joes Biden is so much of a loser he would allowing them to do it vs upholding his presidential oath
This js pretty simple. There is no constitutional right to an abortion, there is one to possessing a firearm. How dense are you people?
Trevor comparing being a parent without a kid to working but not making a living KILLED me
"the Prime Minister said those strikes are wrong and unnecessary"
i think he's describing himself
Working without affording stuff is the shitiest thing ever
And general strikes are the #1 way to get your needs met as the working class.
Working just to be able to afford to work: slavery with extra steps
It's always been like this.
@@ShinyTillDawn doesnt mean it has to stay like this
and what they cant afford? iphone 13 max and a ferrari?
America just keeps getting sadder and sadder.... breaks my heart.
You mean madder and madder.
@@Crowns57854 It didn't know that rising problems such as school shooting means things are finally becoming "ethical again". This country indeed gets sadder and sadder.
By the way, the weather is wonderful today.
@@Crowns57854 is there more to ethics than ending abortion rights? What about feeding hungry children? Homing the homeless. Why force more into a world we already don’t take care of?
@@yogawithjengentleyoga3614 Well lets make it so that men don't have to pay for child health care
@@mrgroovy5113 And how do criminals not follow the law? by breaking the law, they would have gotten a gun either way
I do not have my own Secret Service protection detail, but members of the Supreme Court do, which is not equal protection under the law. I demand equal protection under the law, so either the US government provides me with my own secret service protection, or they stop providing it to Supreme Court Members. This is lawsuit material.
That's why we have 2A. We defend ourselves. If they removed our right to defend ourselves then what you were saying would be more relevant.
The US Secret Service does not protect the Supreme Court Justices, their security is provided by the US Marshals. Doesn't change your point, just correcting who provides the protection.
@@fedbia2003 SC justices also have the right to a firearm. Let them buy firearms with their salary like we have to do. Why do they get special treatment?
@@eiyukabe Same reason courthouses have historically had security.
Yeah, the PROBLEM is ya don't want to injure any Secret Service folks while striking down the latest fascist Court appointees. We NEED to remove the imposters but not damage bystanders. Maybe just go for the families, THEY are not protected. Ginni is available...
I’ve never been more angry at our American government. How can it fail to protect its people so miserably…
Freedom comes at a cost, ask the forefathers and all the battles they fought just to have the Constitution. Clear thinking ppl will always revert back to the Constitution because without it, the true anarchy will begin cause only one group would have the power.
So you are angry at the government for protecting your right to protect yourself ? Seems really smart! 🤣
This is the tail end of someone as objectively unqualified as Trump somehow making it to the highest office. Everyone who voted for him has failed our country.
Please the US government murdered the black panther leader because he pitted the poor against the rich the US government gave a certain population syphilis just to study how they die the US government bombed several children in Afghanistan but history will never teach you this in a book made in America
Via massive. unchecked gerrymandering by Republican-dominated state legislatures (themselves a byproduct of gerrymandering), inexorable takeover of the judiciary by reactionary political hacks and religious bigots, and a multi-billion dollar, neofascist media empire dedicated to distraction and scare mongering.
WE ALL NEED TO ORGANIZE A INTERNATIONAL WALK OUT DAY BECAUSE THESE WEALTHY CORPORATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OWE IT TO ALL TAX PAYERS..
exactly!!!!!! taxpayers don't have a say in where their money goes,,,,not a democracy,,,,unfortunately, most employers automatically with hold taxes from paychecks,,,,,,maybe demand cash for services,,,it is a system long designed to keep the majority of people under paid,,,,underinsured, etc. there will be no liberty or freedom for all in a capitalist run country. it's always the peoples "fault". this country is regressing,,not progressing. how can we change this trajectory?
@Cyning everyone strikes. But go ahead, bow down to your overlords, they're only doing their best on measly million dollar salaries at your expense.
International? Why should any American law maker care what i do on Germany.
My races are higher than yours and i take care of vulnerable people.
I see your point.
But you're imposing an international solution to anational problem.
So you can get shot on the street, by someone with a hidden gun?
Ok let's let's expand this let's make it a 30 day walk out and make sure every grocery store convenience store restaurant bar and trucker gets on board. Then we can issue about 30 million Darwin awards.
The UK train strike is as much about conditions as pay. Eg very reduced overtime and weekend rates, forced to work more weekends and compulsory redundancies. I don't blame them. Yes, it's inconvenient but that's the point of a strike.
Conditions in the UK have always been substandard throughout history. That is why they all sailed away to conquer the world through imperialism, because the UK is a bowl of yuck ! "Let's get outta here and sail to India!" they said.
It never ceases to amaze me how people fail to connect the inconvenience of strikes to the convenience provided by workers doing their jobs. Its literally the point. Conditions becoming inconvenient demonstrates the importance of the workers, it shows how much they do and the value they contribute to the functioning of services on a day to day basis.
@@superblondeDotOrg no,that's nonsense. cuz the social class that orchestrated the empire was a different one to that living in squalor.
Boris: "we dont like this"
Union: "YOU HEAR BOYs ? It's working , keep itup!"
@Hai Voai bow down to your overlords, they're only doing their best onmeasly million dollar salaries at your expense.
So it's not unconstitutional for people to justify why they need to carry a concealed weapon, but it is to tell women what to do with their bodies?!!!
Why should anyone have to justify why the need to carry a gun when it's a right afforded to us by the F**KING CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES and abortion isn't. Now I don't agree with taking anyone's rights away but I do have issues when women use abortion and a form of birth control.
The constitutional right is in reference to a well-regulated militia. If you're part of a militia sanctioned by the US government, ok. Thank you for your service.
That birth control reason gets tossed around a lot. I used to use it myself. I don't anymore.
@@mlong1968 What does the word people mean in the 2nd amendment?
I have actually been to Giggleswick. Lovely town, lovely people, one of the greatest vacations of my life.
Turns out this was just the Supreme Court's opening act.
Such a beautiful show
I like how they have just completely abandoned even the vinere of neutrally and are full on open Republican agents.
It's because conservative justices have an originalist view of the Constitution. I'm a liberal, but I still agree with them.
We shouldn't have SCOTUS interpret the Constitution to what we want now. For us to make changes we have to use the legislature.
Ultimately, on Roe or any other major issues, things should be codified in Congress. I don't want 9 people being able to give and take decisions like Roe.
It's just that you're full on anti constitutional, republicans have always stood up for the second amendment and it's one of the reasons I always vote for them.
@@dwightschrute491 As if the constitution isn't full of amendments.
You're the type of guy who likes the rules as long as they only benefit you personally, soon as a brown person tries. OOPS, RIDES CLOSED, ROOMS ARE FILLED, NO VACANCY.
And yes that's and underhanded way of calling you a racist. Which I am sure you are, as 99.9% of originalist are . Honestly I wouldn't mind trying my hand at some dueling with you gringos. Maybe we do need to go back to those times.
I CHALLENGE YOU TO A DUEL!
ehh that s logical , usa is the country of cowboys and western , guns are part of the history and the identity there , you can't live with guns don't live in the homeland of cowboys
@@fedbia2003 Well said!
As an African I can hear Trevor go back to his roots once in a while.. ever so subtly... It's amazing to watch
he should go back to Africa since he hates law abiding Americans carrying guns . we all know that there is zero gun crimes in africa because they have no laws
I love the comparison Trevor made to Thanos. Yes, The Supreme Court is like evil Thanos. They have the 6 infinity stones and they're using it to snap at everything that displeases them and they are determined to wipe out the majority. Only the extremists right should remain in their opinion. Let's get the Avengers to save the country from these evildoers.
How could it possibly be against the “majority”?
Do you know how our system works?
Open your eyes and start thinking for yourself and you’ll see that people with your thoughts are the MINORITY and it is YOU that are the extremists
They just overturned Roe vs. Wade, they have gone mad with power.
Evil÷sicklkkkkkkkkkjjjjjj
All that court stacking is working overtime this week.
Know how your state elects their Supreme Court. If you can vote for judges, do. If you can vote against retention, know about it. And obviously, vote for your governor.
It's all we can do, as individuals, now that the Supreme Court is a political activism tool, not a group that interprets the laws without bias.
USA should somehow change its political system.. Everything seems politicized too much, everything is "liberal vs conservative" and it seems that many people are just allergic to the opposite side and will use every oportunity to destroy it. It will bring destruction to your country. (I'm not from USA).
A court is no place for a religious Fundamentalist. But that's what we have in spades
This reality adaptation of the Handmaid's Tale is pretty upsetting.
The supreme court does not represent the country anymore. They should start over and remove lifetime appointments. These people are out of touch with the country.
They represent me as a black male well as well as many people in my life we have been waiting for this obvious and needed decision
yeah... 7 of the 9 are all the same religion and went through the same social and educational systems.
No. Just this fan base.
@@randomactsofriding4850
What have you been waiting your life for. To carry a gun or tell a woman what to do with her body?
The constitution says I'm allowed to protect myself and the sc agreed. How is that not representation?
I feel so sorry for everybody who lives in America. Exspecially for all the women .
Thank you. I’m absolutely terrified right now. America isn’t even trying to hide its misogyny and it’s enabling of violence right now.
Colion Noir is going to tear you a new one AGAIN LOL
Kind of wish the "state's rights" party would go back to actually wanting state's rights. It's insane to me they think they can model a crowded city's gun laws after some deeply rural area where you have to go for a drive to see your neighbors.
Yes, the Supreme Court Justices from the "party of states rights" takes away New Yorks right to make their own laws and get applauded. I am disgusted!
Roe v Wade isn't a Constitutional amendment. 2A is.
The only states' rights they're interested in is states' rights to own people.
First slaves, now women.
There were never any state's rights, the confederacy enforced slavery across the nation.
I agree. The city people are savages that cannot be trusted with arms. They should be subjugated to a class that has less rights.
Thursday: Big news coming out of the Supreme Court.
Friday morning Supreme Court: hold my beer 🍺
So , as I understand the Supreme Court , the government can arrest and jail you without Miranda rights , execute you even if your lawyer screws up , FORCE you to have a baby , and use tax dollars to support religion . But it can't protect your right to vote or keep you safe from guns.
Friday morning Supreme Court: oh wait, Kavanaugh drank it. And the keg it came from.
Wish they would overturn the ruling about federal taxation. Or any law that prohibits law abiding citizens from owning guns. I.e. red flag gun laws.
@@Chunkboi I was about to make a reply about Brent Kavanaugh, but yours is much funnier.
SCOTUS is a time machine. First decision returned the country to the 1850ies, second one to the middle ages.
I think the Supreme Court has lost the privilege to make a ruling on anything at this point
Because they hold a different view?
@@umarmoolla Because they do not represent the country at this point.
@@jlmcvay1971 I think u disagree since there is a substantial amount of up standing citizens that wish to keep their guns and have their 2A rights taken away ...
@@jlmcvay1971 It is not their job to represent the country. It is their job to interpret the constitution. Abortion is not mentioned anywhere in the constitution. What people need to do is make the effort to amend that and get it in, not try and argue that it already is when it is not.
@@umarmoolla they’re not supposed to hold a “different view” they are to be neutral, that was there original purpose, now you have a politicized court that favors conservative ideology. Not to mention that those justices all affirmed that roe v wade was to be protected under oath when they were confirmed.
I am disgusted with the Supreme Court’s striking down of Roe. I thought the US was a country of separation of church and state.
Christofascism has always been the goal of the right wing.
Yeah hasnt been that way in a long time.
There’s nothing in the Bible that says that a fetus is more important than the woman baring it! It even says that if a woman is in danger and won’t survive the birth, then aborting it is the rightful thing to do.
And there is no such thing as a late term abortion, those are called BIRTHS.
This is not an appeal to religion at all, this is pure misogyny.
@@winxclubstellamusa thank you finally someone said it, people need to start reading the Bible to really see what it says and doesn’t say
@@user-xn3rs7tu5w definitely! It’s horrible that evil people to use it to excuse their cruelty.
This is so embarrassing 😳 other countries are going to have a field day with this one🤯😵💫🥴
@Victor so 😔 😟 🙁 😥
Those other countries dare not step foot on US soil though
@@SylentONE why would they want to??? 😕 they're actually feeling sorry for us and some lauphing
@@jackibierman2246 because governments want more land and more power, that is their #1 goals every single time, you know this country exists because of guns right?
@@10toppers wow really!! No one statement surprise me at all!! VOTE BLUE 💙
You need to do segment update with this episode
They just struck down Roe V Wade
I’m sure he will talk all about it tonight
@@soledieairvideos5974 I hope. I’m absolutely terrified right now.
Since the Supreme Court has struck down NY law and declared that laws should be based on consistency with historical precedent, then the obvious precedent is; when the second amendment was written, there was no such thing as repeating firearms, or semi-auto or automatic firearms. So let's stick with historical precedent. Everybody gets to carry firearms that comply with weapons available when the Constitution was written. Single fire weapons, without rifling, no semi-auto or automatic weapons. HISTORICAL CONSISTENCY.
So the 1st amendment only applies to physical speech, things written on parchment with a quill or on an 18th century printing press… duly noted.
Oh, and you’re wrong about there not being repeating firearms at the time. Please. Do some research so that you don’t make this uneducated statement again.
This is a valuable comment.👏👏
@@hivelsword From the Smithsonian -- "The practice was started in Southern states, which were among the first to enact laws against concealed carry of guns and knives, in the early 1800s. While a few citizens challenged the bans in court, most lost. Winkler, in his book Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America, points to an 1840 Alabama court that, in upholding its state ban, ruled it was a state's right to regulate where and how a citizen could carry, and that the state constitution's allowance of personal firearms “is not to bear arms upon all occasions and in all places.” -- Historical Precedent. So let's go ahead and argue about which historical precedent stands... and don't forget get about the total carry bans in frontier towns .. Dodge City, Tombstone etc.. I think we're about to have some nice long arguments about historical precedent.
@@hivelsword I'll be more than happy to allow you to carry a repeating, breech loading flintlock. Have fun.
@Clem Fandango First amendment says freedom of the PRESS and speech. Press can include anything that can fall under the definition of press and every piece of code written has been typed in .. a form of press or in some cases spoken, using conversion of sound to digital format, derived from keyed in code .. PRESS.
Should've added more Justice's
Yeah, and now they just revoked Roe as well. Those conservative justices are just out of control!
I can’t stand this country
and in the decision, Thomas listed a whole bunch of other laws he believed should be revoked too,.. and took a few shots at the 14th amendment itself.
There actually is a rather significant 'legal' movement to invalidate the 14th amendment, and it was not that long ago that the legal framework we saw in today's case was part of their fringe belief too.. so chucking the whoel amendment is no longer all that out there.
@@vernond4292 Nobody's forcing you to stay, pardner
@@TheSundayShooter hope you like that thousands of women will die in Red states
Maybe the Loving decision will be next. They seem to be in the whole, turn back the clock, kind of thing. I expect more states to rule by tyranny coming up. Time to brush off those Almanacs, new ones will be created. But alas, this is what mass apathy has brought.
Give Trevor any complex issue He will make it fun.
im in New York..its very here already
It’s very here what?
@@pamelabarbato1623 six nine laughing Guliani gun laws and Guliani Jr boondoggle style all's on the video come to death row ha ha
so sorry I messed up wording .No not drinking also
Maybe I need a drink to get a sentence correct
Trevor, that parent with no children line was amazing!!
The Supreme Court can’t enforce its rulings, it’s reliant on the other branches to do that for them.
This shows how broken the justice system in America!
In 1880, the time of Wyatt Earp in Tombstone people would have to hand in their guns when entering the city. They'd go to the sheriff's office and them in and get a token to claim their guns back when they were ready to leave. Also no concealed carry was aloud unless you're law enforcement. Crazy that they had stricter gun laws in the wild west than now.
yeah, folks forget how towns treated guns back then, and most people thought it was reasonable to keep thing civil in a small western town.
Sounds like a nightmare
@@picolascage8123 Europe would be a nightmare for you than... Here in Germany we had had from June 1871(!) till June 2022, so I'm talking about a time period of 151 years "only" 19 attacks on schools and universities with 89 casualties. Most victims were with illegal purchased semi automatic guns, (in these few cases, we can talk about mass shootings) in general these attackers used, due to our very strict gun laws, knifes, in one case a crossbow.
Gun laws are so awful! Maybe you're afraid of them, because they're working!
What you're doing is called cherry picking data. The majority of the Wild West had guns mostly to protect from outlaws and wildlife. It was not uncommon in the slightest to see people with pistols, rifles, or shotguns.
You should know how deceptive your statement is. Also, don't forget the OK Corral.
@@Thomas83KO how many tens of millions of unarmed civilians where slaughtered by tyrannical governments in the last 150 years in Europe?
In TN we have already eliminated requirements for conceal/carry. Anyone 21 or over do not require a permit to carry.
Exceptional highlighting, yes all bright lights on the other side. Thank You !
Trevor the confused train engine was definitely not what i was expecting today lol
Waiting for Trevor to cover the Supreme Court overruling Roe v Wade
Next week
Me toooo and m not even American
@@majdaelbazzaoui7941 me neither but I live here :/
@@davidfuentes9957 Monday?
My cousin worked as a delivery truck driver in NYC for 30 years. He would get mugged on the way to/from work quite often and his truck robbed dozens of times. Several times he was beaten and once hospitalized with life threatening injuries requiring a blood transfusion. As he got older he decided he couldn't take the beatings anymore and applied for a handgun permit and was denied. I guess he didn't grease the right person. But it all worked out because he did retire and move to Florida where they did grant him a concealed weapons license. But by then the complications from the earlier beatings had debilitated him and he did get to use that gun one last time on himself.
this is really gonna help the gun related crime rates in NYC, Chicago, etc etc… common sense was meant to be used, not just reading a 250yo document written during slavery, before modern technology.
The 250 yr old document was made in faith of a future that would be inevitable. That is: government being overbearing to its people.
The issue of firearm violence is what is not covered by the bill of rights. So, this leaves a problem in which a solution can not be practiced without great distrust in the people.
Its not that one argues that removing guns will not stop firearm violence. It will. /However/, it compromises a right iterated by the document, which was made in faith that this would ensure people have leverage in their government.
Yaaaawwwwnnnnn………. The men who wrote that 250 year old masterpiece knew more about life and liberty than anyone running the show these days….
@@mrniceguy3750 Well most of them bought and sold human beings so I guess your right?🤔🤨
@@ronaldomontora2449 If you would do some research and not simply rely on the talking heads, you would realize that slavery in the Americas was established by the King of England.. Our founding Fathers inherited this atrocity.. Jefferson Thomas boldly explained to “who at the time” was his King, that slavery was wrong!! And that the King alone was responsible for it to have even existed in the United States.. The only reason that this wasn’t in the document we know as the Declaration of Independence, was the fact that the States of Georgia and South Carolina would not agree with the other eleven States.. When your breaking away from the King of England you cannot show any devisions in your ranks… Our founding Fathers were indeed far better persons than you or me….
so how is allowing the law abiding to conceal carry to protect themselves gonna make crime worse?
its highly ironic that the reps and all their actions are destroy what they want: a strong and united US.
They just want a dictatorship.
The US is no where near united
What makes you think thats what they want?
They don't want a united US. They want us divided so they can keep doing all their own shady stuff while we are distracted.
Divide and conquer?
Yes yes having guns around everyone having guns calms everyone down
That isn’t the goal and most of the time whether it’s a criminal or law abiding person you won’t know they have it…
@martin deano boooooooooo
@martin deano ah the honor argument... that assumes the people who 'deserve respect' have guns, and the people who 'should show respect' to not, thus are polite to their betters.
You do realize that is where the phrase came from, right?
@martin deano tell that to chengiz khan....mongols were armed society...
@@vernond4292 There is some truth in their statement. Not being able to know who is armed and who is not, can de incentivize criminals from finding victims.
Criminals always target people in transitional spaces, people who look weak, and so on. Speaking with experience, I've only known security personnel and criminals to possess firearms, aside from law enforcement. But with new uncertainty, criminals may think twice before picking on the law-abiding skinny dude.
I work at an alarm dispatch center and Chicago is HORRIBLE to dispatch in. Especially for medical alarms. They won't even guarantee a response unless you talk to the person and they identify a problem. But how is granny supposed to answer the phone if she's having a heart attack or fell n can't get up? I've literally had dispatchers say, "no answer on site? What do you expect us to do about it?" Literally the only city in the whole country that does that and i dispatch in HUNDREDS of cities across two thirds of the lower 48 states.
My final thoughts? Don't get old in Chicago.
"this is a TIGER market" - LOL - I CAN't!!!!!
Hello tabia are you doing today.?
Supreme Court needs new justices. This is wild how fast we going back to the 1950s
That is the point....
The courts have made a new requirement, out of thin air, that a right be 'traditionally recognized.'
Only the 9th amendment is literally impossible to recognize in a traditional sense... so no personal rights for you!
@@lostbutfreesoul That's called an originalist interpretation of the Constitution and most conservative judges have it.
Not even…they are going back to the 1850’s.
@@Chunkboi couldn’t agree more!
@@fedbia2003 ,
Only when 'original text' matches up with their political beliefs though.
They will dig through thousands of 'supplementary text' written by the many founders, ignoring the competing text that doesn't match their view and decades of people arguing over what that means, in order to *pass a ruling* as to why we should ignore hundreds of years of history. We can have a whole amendment dedicated to personal rights, rights held not by The States or The Congress but the people, be ignored by these 'originalists' till the 1960's and... that is apparently what the founders wanted as far as this interpretation goes. Now that group has power to make changes outside of any law, and they want to use that power to undo cases that had 9th amendment consideration... on grounds that they where not traditional enough!
How originalistic of them....
No, this group is talking out it's ****** and is just political as their opponents.
That Knicks joke though 😭👏
This is why absolute power is dangerous.
TREVOR IS HILARIOUS 😂, THE GUN STORES SHOULD ONLY BE OPEN ON THE NIGHT THAT THE KNICKS WIN
🤣🤣🤣 too funny! But makes sense hey
And they only sell blanks, so everyone can safely engage in celebratory gunfire!
@@emilianchux5789 Proof?
And it makes sense because now they would purposely lose because they know it's an incentive
That had me a heart attack! 😂
Finally when both the parties were coming to an agreement, the supreme court found it unconstitutional that it was happening and struck a blow, not because they wanted to protect the second amendment.
Edit:many people have not been able to see the statement as sarcastic or rhetoric,they way in which it was meant.
It's like they decided they were some cabal who actually are dictators, because unlike the other offices, theirs are for life, now they are showing that the 'checks & balances' don't work. This is scary 💩 right here
The same people who are pro abortion are also the same ones who want open borders.
Summer Banger Mix 🔥
ua-cam.com/video/7sNkckD5Ff8/v-deo.html
Summer Banger Mix 🔥
ua-cam.com/video/7sNkckD5Ff8/v-deo.html
It is a violation of civil rights to deny someone a carry license just because you do not believe in self defense
I don’t know if his joke referencing a well regulated militia fell on receptive ears. Don’t think half his audience got that.
"..It's not fair for somebody to work a full-time job but not be able to make ends meet" 🤔
I agree, it is not worth it.
He is exaggerating, they all make money, how come then they exit fro the Eropean Union to have full control of their immigration system??
Because a lot of people wanted to go to UK to live because they get more money, so happens in the U.S.
@@johnwaters7847 Ok he may be exaggerating also It may be true that they are paid more... but still because of high cost of living and other hard economic conditions makes that salary not be enough.🙂
SCOTUS is losing its reverence, esteem. Respect. Its too unbalanced. This is troubling
Hahahahahaha SCOTUS is too unbalanced 😂😂😂
something I always found fasinating.. I hear people talking about 'well, progressives loved SCOTUS when it was unbalanced in their favor!' shows a fundamental difference in ideas about balance and inclusion. progressives were perfectly happy with a 4-1-4 split and considered that balanced... progressives value differences. Conservatives consider 7-2 fair since that is how they see 'valuing differences', specifically only one voice should be heard and attempts to balance it with any other are 'unfair'.
SCOTUS is doing exactly what they should do honor the law of the land
@@randomactsofriding4850 booooooooooo
@@randomactsofriding4850 not really. they are making up new laws based off alternative history taught in religious schools. the whole point of getting these justices in place was to undo the law.
Ah yes, because everyone remembers The Weather Girl's classic song: It's Raining Guns. 😂
Finally enjoyed Kosta’s stock market report: Well thought out jokes instead of just repeating the headlines that Trevor highlighted .
I’m pretty sure criminals in NY never worried about proving that they needed to carry a gun for their protection and just do it, so I guess being a law abiding citizen with constitutional rights being allowed to carry is fair…. I mean I’m no expert
Police see a person with concealed gun they could very their permit and prevent crime. The crimal either runs or gets caught before doing crime. Now the crime will happen and more because easier for criminals.
You're not an expert, just the regular braindead american UA-camr.
Somehow everywhere in the world it's safer than in the US with its insane second amendment.
@@cwmobilecm So I a city of millions of people a cop is going to see someone carrying a gun and stop them preventing a crime...🤣😂🤣🤣🤣. You have been watching one to many heists movies 🤣🤣
Correct, you are no expert and should continue to live as such.
@@SinHurr No need to be an expert to understand a basic living function
#1: Supreme court judge should not be a job for life. #2: Constitutional Amandements from 1791 should be seen in historical context and should be adjusted to fit the 21. century
Wrong
2a shall NOT be infringed
@@Lenevor amendments can be changed...look at the probation....
@@swimswim5090 right...
@@paessensdanny9443 wait until you realize that "probation" isn't one event
Again. Maybe if they start feeling the impact of their decisions personally they would know 🤔
Oooo if only, I’m waiting for it
I'm German and I have no idea why those supreme court rulings make me angry, but they do and I feel really sorry for the US.
Mind your business Ben--considering how lousy your police and military are with aspiring fascists, you might want to think about who has all of the weapons--and training--in your own country first, eh?
@@scottdegregoris7987 Oh boy, get some education before you talk total BS! I'm quite happy how things are working over here. I don't fear poverty, I studied for free, I earn plenty of money, I don't fear beeing shot or harmed in any other way in public, I can easily afford any kind of medical treatment and pharmacy. So shut up!
@@scottdegregoris7987 typical attitude. Do you even see what he is trying to say? English is not my native language but I understand what he wants to say. Man you guys are always ready to pick fights.
@@scottdegregoris7987 I’m not from Germany, but I am pretty sure that Germans are not afraid on a daily basis that their kids might be killed by psychopaths with guns in schools and kindergartens. P. S. As for fascists … what do you think the white supremacists are?
@@sr0917 Problems are everywhere in the world, but yeah, it seems that US is moving backwards faster than other countries and, as usually, this will have effect not only in US, but it can become a wave of craziness, with epicenter in Washington DC. Between this and the war in Ukraine … most Europeans are worried.
So journalists here in the Netherlands are saying that these court orders and gun politics are backed by a small conservative group. How is it possible that a small but powerful group is able to make nationwide changes in a federation that prides itself in democracy and representation?
"So journalists here in the Netherlands are saying that these court orders and gun politics are backed by a small conservative group."
Q: So why are you believing lying Dutch journos??
@@PanhandleFrank
Because unlike doxed Trumpists, I don't have any prior reason not to believe them.
You know things are rough when Paddington can't even afford an emergency jam sandwich under his hat.
Spike Lee is loving you about them KNICKS Trevor!!!
😂😂😂
The standard answer to "Someone who works a full time job should not struggle to pay their bills" is "Everyone is now part time."
Looking at these most recent decisions, if I were a Supreme Court justice I would avoid places where some of the affected people work. Like restaurants. Who knows what the kitchen and waitstaff might do to my food before it reaches my table?
7th letter
15th letter twice
4th letter
thing the Supreme Court doesn't watch Trevor Noah...
😄 You had to do our KNICKS brothers like that Trev 😂😂
They've gone wild. Going into a place where the supreme court is just another political party.
and all the time pretending they're upset that Americans increasingly don't trust them to make unbiased decisions.
Always called them the Shitpreme Court. Absolutely worthless.
Did you even read the ruling. Probably not or did you listen to the oral arguments?Probably not. I know, I know you don't have to. Fun fact our founding fathers set up a form a government that shouldn't have been flawed but it is but for all its flaws it's separates power for a reason. Ny, Md, Nj,Ma,Md, Ca, and Hi have been successful in violating the rights of citizens for about 100 years amd yesterday that was corrected. You don't have to agree, nor respect the decision the decision was made. For the people who don't like it there are plenty of countries where firearms are outlawed by the government and they are free to move.
@@nelfar213000 Very predictable!! You know if people didn't like what was happening in Ca, Ny, etc, they could also move to other countries (or states) where that stuff is different? Unfortunately the world requires a little more reasoning than quick punch lines of "are free to move". Sad for some people but it's reality!
@@allanbuyinza9163 first I don't live in Ny, I left shortly after 9-11. I live in a state where it's our rights are respected. I did however took the liberty an read the opinion, and I have a high regard for Justice Breyer his dissent is atrocious, he made clear his biases towards the second amendment which is disturbing because he makes a stark departure from his views with respect to constitutional challenges as it pertains to the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th 10th and 14th amendment's. So ask yourself why this stark contrast? Oh because like our politicians he feels the 2nd is considered a 2nd class right. Well sorry to break it to you. It's not.
Europe must be a nightmare for all these gunlovers. Here in Germany we had had from June 1871(!) till June 2022, so I'm talking about a time period of 151 years "only" 19 attacks on schools and universities with 89 casualties. Most victims were with illegal purchased semi automatic guns (and here, in these few cases, we are talking about mass shootings), in general these attackers used, due to our very strict gun laws, knifes, in one case a crossbow.
Gun laws are so awful! Maybe these guys are afraid of them, because they're working
And, i might add, you can get guns here. Even Semiautomatics. You just need a reason and a clean background, and the reason must continue (Sport shooting, hunting and some smaller ones). People see you at these social events and if you become…strange…they inform the authorities and your guns are gone. Same goes when you stop hunting/sport shooting, etc. the club informs the authorities and they ask you: so…for what purpose do you still need guns? And if you don’t hsve a recognized one you need to give them up. It’s a harsh system, sometimes even to harsh in my opinion, especially if you look at our neighbors (Switzerland) with their much more liberties, but at least it protects the people, gun owners included. And yes, some parties want to expell guns completely, like the Green Party. I hope they won’t get trough with it, since it won’t really advance the safety of th3 people, but cut off many hobbies and cultural roots people have with these activities
@@Thomas83KO Absolut, Delikte abseits des Themas Waffen spielen bei uns natürlich mit rein! Und das auch ganz zurecht. Es gab mal einen Fall in Karlsruhe, da wurde einem Jäger wegen mehrfachen Falschparkens die Waffen abgenommen, er würde „Staatsablehnendes Verhalten“ zeigen, weil er immer wieder mit Absicht falsch parken würde (war ein Streit mit ner lokalen Behörde über einen Parkbereich). In dem Fall hat sich der Jäger erfolgreich gewehrt, und seine Waffen wieder zurück erhalten. Aber ansonsten wird bei jedem größeren Delikt das Recht auf Waffenbesitz widerrufen. Egal ob rasen mit dem Auto, Steuerbetrug, Drogen oder sonstiges. Im Gegensatz zu USA ist der Waffenbesitz bei uns ein Privileg, kein Recht.
did you know the majority of mass shootings as well as firearm related homicides are gang/drug related? The most common weapon used in these crimes are actually pistols while long arms only account for a few hundred homicides per year. The problem here is mental health and crime which I imagine Germany doesn't have as much of a problem with that as we do here in the US.
@@UgandanAirForce mental health is the same rate as most of the modern world. They have strict gun laws therefore less gun deaths. It’s common sense. Look at Japan and Australia. Australia increase their gun laws and gun violence basically disappeared.
I guess we’re ignoring the millions of your own country men and women killed in concentration camps after their weapons were confiscated. I’ve lived in Germany and your lack of respect towards the dead is insane.
So I won't be able to obtain contraceptives but I can obtain a gun....
As a New Yorker I am absolutely terrified to go outside now. I can’t believe this. I’m thinking about leaving the country.
Please leave
@@tripleplayacademy2172 Or else...
BANG BANG SELF-DEFENSE BANG
Sounds nice, must be one of those rich New Yorkers that is exactly the problem.
Can’t blame you
I heard there's discounts on one-way fights
The US needs to change is national motto to: All ye who come here, abandon all hope.
Times are bad and getting worse fast
really worried for our country right now, I hope we can figure out laws so that we can be more safe and policies more thoughtful/equitable...
I love the new bit: stock market, traffic, weather. Fantastic.
Supreme Court remaining unhelpful to anyone's safety.
Yeah, detrimental actually
SCOTUS also just now struck down Roe v Wade.
Tonight on the daily show….
They struck it down based on law from the 1600s. If women are going to lose our rights based on laws from that era, black people should be terrified. What’s to stop SCOTUS from reinstating slavery based on laws from those times?
Love your show, I really get you!... Keep up the great work!
I love this show, my daily therapy
The only thing that stops my fork from becoming an assault trident at dinner is called self-control.
New York could just exempt single-shot muzzle-loading muskets from those concealed carry permit requirements and voilà, traditional constitutional rights guarded.
That would be similar to freedom of speech being protected only in person from one to another. Since the internet wasn't around back then, it isn't covered?
Thomas already thought of that he said modern day weapons are included
@@9x19freedom Nobody has claimed that the SCOTUS decision is consistent in any way.
@@davidmarshall6243 yah That's why the law need to be improved and derivated to accommodate the current issues.
The constitutional right state that : "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
For some reason, this is interpreted by some people as an individual right completely disjointed from its purpose : making well regulated militias a thing.
Trevor has definitely the best writers among all night shows. Not even close.
Even if 5 million Americans would sit behind the Scotus for a month they would give up. But protests are only for one day in the busy country.
The reason that requiring a "special reason" is unconstitutional is because it if that law remains then who decides what is "special"? In California the police department somehow keeps giving the conceal carry liscences with special reason to super wealthy people only. That creates inequality with the person that isn't rich,and lives in a super dangerous neighborhood..
Not so in NY. A lot of wealthy people are denied just the same. They're advised to hire a security detail.
A "special" reason should be defined as someone who has a stalker or has a history of being abused or shot at or has a huge amount of gun training with a mental health and background checks. That sounds special to me.
"well-regulated militia"
@@MahanFan1 The Security Detail which consists of off duty cops? It's a shakedown on a Constitutional Right
Nonsense. Resolve the corruption, don't regressively re-interpret the Constitution...
The court being a 6 to 3 split will result in being the most damaging body of goverment. The fact that they think they can just remove anything at will is scary.
The court shouldn't even be partisan.
@@ShinyTillDawn ,
But it is... so what is going to happen next?
They interpret the Constitution. Only the Legislature can change things at will.
@@fedbia2003 Yes but what happens when the Supreme Court deems something unconstitutional? It is changed so it is their decision that changes it so what is your point?
@@warrenburke4241 Judicial Review is my point. They have the right of Constitutional Interpretation. That's literally what the Constitution says.
By the definition within the Constitution they really technically can't do anything unconstitutional. That's why they're careful with their decisions. Dozens of time throughout US history this argument has been discussed by the Justices themselves.
Now, if an interpretation of the government doesn't work with people the it's up to the Legislature to change it.
NY should simply inform the SC that it won't comply with the ruling. What will they do.
is comb cost so much in UK even PM cannot afford it??
NY''s law was restrictive to the point where the vast majority of law abiding citizens with no criminal records could not obtain a CC permit to carry to defend themselves.
And the way forward is to let everyone have concealed carry, including non law abiding citizens. Fantastic move
Just out of pure curiosity here, but what about open carry?
Isn't the point with concealed carry to hide the fact you have a gun, to "conceal" it on your person?
And what need would a person have that would require the concealment of the gun if they could openly carry it?
Does NY have laws preventing open carry and that's why concealed carry is so important?
This isn't a gotcha. This is a legit question. The only time I carry a small knife on my person (2" blade) is for utility and it's only hidden by the fact that it's too small to hang on a hip so it goes in a pocket. Which would be a weird argument with a gun.
NY gun laws made NY safer! NY had one of the lowest firearm mortality rates! Places like WI have 5x more deaths by firearm than NY and California
@@catelynh1020 a conceal carry must not be seen to others, so either a purse or a holster under your outer clothes, to create a safe space for others because I think with open carry other people would be uncomfortable and cannot relax seeing a firearm displayed so blatant in public.
@@adventofnull yeah thats not what happened, please educate yourself before making opinions
Chicago PD is going to be a VERY different show next season...
and i just love that show 😊
Why? It's Chicago, not New York.
@@meganbarber3599 The restrictions on foot chases.
@@teresabenson3385 Well luckily it's just a show. Nothing will be different.
What happens if a state ignores a supreme court ruling?
Hey!! I've been to Nether Wallop! It's just south of Over Wallop and Middle Wallop!
just need another black panther moment for them to roll this back
Retired Jedi ? Supreme Court dress code !!!!!! I can’t take this genius humor !! I need it this week ! Any kind of humor my way … between guns and Roe Vs Wade … I am going bananas !
I'm real tired of this country.....
Bye!!!!
hahaha the Knicks joke is the best. As a longtime Knicks fan, I love it.
The cops I know call it a "run tax". They're all too happy to kick somebody to the ground in those situations.
The cops you know are prime candidates for retirement plan 187