Cormack McCarthy. Provocative author. Blood Meridian. Great show. Have them on again. Wonderful combination of minds and experiences. And faithful. Thanks, Tim.
Daryl’s Jonestown series is one of the best podcasts I’ve ever heard. The way he weaves the radical left of the 60’s and 70’s in and out of the Jonestown cult was brilliant. I’m totally addicted to his podcast. His dark historical subject really get my brain going. The Unraveling podcast he does with Jocko is damn good too.
Like the Prodigal Son, the only chance for societal survival, is a return to the Father. That return should be led by the Church. But that Church, or at least the Vatican, are suppressing those parts of the Church that are most God centered, such as the Carmelite Sisters of Fairfield, PA.
Darryl Cooper is the man! Martyr Made is the best history podcast in the game. It's like a harder core hardcore history. Everyone needs to check it out. especially episode 19, "the anti humans".
Dear Tim, help me out if you can. I am writing about the 7 sorrows of Mary. Who was Pelbart? He related a revelation about St. John's vision of Mary from St. Elizabeth but who was Pelbart? Can't find anything on the net. Many thanks.
I have no idea how anyone can think Christianity, uniquely, is literally true in its empriical claims about the divine when everything about it just looks like every other religion in terms of revelation and ways of knowing. Its just a syncretic result of several previous threads extant just before it appeared. Everything Christian about it was already in place in Hellenistic Judaism and Zoroastrianism. Christians just seem unaware of the source material.
I disagree re what Nietzsche was revolting against. There is a tradition in Germany of the sons of Lutheran pastors, e.g. Lessing. (Indeed, German Englightment was mostly carried on by the sons of pastors, this being the reason that it was not so radical like in France.) I would view N's problematic within the Lutheran tradition of the "freedom of the will", itself a version of the Ocham's and nominalism's God of almighty WILL. Wishing nominalism, what (= essence) IS (Sein, esse, to be, être, ser), is a function of what the (divine) will choses to be--a metaphysics that reoccurs in postmodernism on to transgenderism. Nietzsche's obsession with the will is a function of 14th Century nominalist Catholicism as it came into Germany and influenced Luther. Luther rejected in a m post radical way any role of the will re salvation. I suggest obtaining and reading Michael Allen Gillespie's The Theological Origins of Modernity (2008). Your understanding of the "big change", i.e., the birth of modernity, will change. As to German Idealism, specifically Fichte, the will plays a similar role, indeed, Marx' critique of capitalism is directly connect with his effective acceptance of the "will" a la Ficthe. Hegel, in my judgment, sought to reinstate the will under reason's rule, hence your demonization of Hegel is not correct. What the "left" made of Hegelianism after his death, is in many ways a rejection of Hegel's synthesis and a return to the will as the source of being (esse, etc.) Marxism is a triumph of Fichte, not of Hegel. . Thank you for an intellectual discussion, it is rare nowadays, Prof. Leonard Wessell (ret.) Bonn, Germany PS As much as I find worthy the philosophical thinking Aristotle and Aquinas, etc., it fails as a metaphysics. Why? Realism! But then, I am an ontological idealist (I am writing a book on it now) and I am sure that none of you know what that self-designation means.
Guten Tag Herr Wessell, möglicherweise fasse den Schluss Ihrer Nachricht falsch auf, aber ich finde es schade, dass Sie einen nachdenklichen Kommentar verfassen, und diesen dann mit einem Satz beenden, der, so scheint es mir, maßlose Arroganz verrät. Selbst wenn die Herren im Video Ihre Selbstbezeichnung nicht kennen, tun Sie sich keinen Gefallen es in dieser Weise zu äußern.
@@donpaco6536 Bald genug werde ich zwei Bücher veröffentlichen, worin ich das Thema ausführlich bespreche. Ich bin ein "ontological idealist", was bedeutet, daß ich ernsthafte Fehler in der philosophischen Richtung "Realismus" finde. Gordon und andere versuchen, oft zu energisch, "Thomism" als DIE und die EINZIGE richtige Philosophie der Katholischen Kirche aufzuzwingen. (Aus anderen Gründen hat der Jesuit Bernard Lonergan die oft starre Philosophie der Kirche vernichtend kritisiert.) Ich versuche, die Thomisten zu provozieren, damit wir ins Gespräch mit einander kommen. Vergebens! T. Gordon ist philosophisch gebildet, ein erwachsener Mann; es ist klar, er kann er verkraften. Bitte, seien Sie vorsichtig mit Ihren "ad-hominem"-Beleidigungen. Das ist nicht die Art und Weise, wie man mit einem alten Prof. Dr. Dr. Dr. Wer-auch-immer umgehen sollte; sogar kommt es mir als unwürdig vor und, ja, vielleicht ein bißchen "arrogant". Eine Kritik ist akzeptierbar, eine Beleidigung nicht!
@@donpaco6536 Wir stehen vor einem alten philosophischen Problem: Sein vs Schein. "Maßlose Arroganz" kommt mir vor als Prädikat, das mich qualifizieren sollte. Deshalb, "so scheint es mir", habe ich als eine "maßlose" Beleidigung. Kann wohl sein, daß Sie superempfindlich sind oder ...? Schein oder Sein? Ich schätze Gordon und einige andere "traditionalists" sehr hoch, Dennoch scheint es mir, daß weder Gorden noch einige andere die wahre Lage der Kirche anerkennen wollen. Viganò bebautet: "Francis is a non-Catholic Pope!". Wenn so, das ist ein Thema, das wahrhaft erörtert werden sollte. Aber die Dinge sind nicht so. Ich trete hart auf, um hoffentlich ein Gespräch in Gang anzufangen--bisher vergebens.
MartyrMade!
Awesome Tim!
Daryl's series on Jim Jones and People's Temple...wow so good, and terrifying.
Thank you Timothy and guests.
Cormack McCarthy. Provocative author. Blood Meridian. Great show. Have them on again. Wonderful combination of minds and experiences. And faithful. Thanks, Tim.
Talk about unexpected crossovers! Have no idea what to expect but looking forward to listening.
Darryl Cooper has great insights into the modern angst.
Daryl’s Jonestown series is one of the best podcasts I’ve ever heard. The way he weaves the radical left of the 60’s and 70’s in and out of the Jonestown cult was brilliant. I’m totally addicted to his podcast. His dark historical subject really get my brain going. The Unraveling podcast he does with Jocko is damn good too.
Mighty fine episode, my sir
Like the Prodigal Son, the only chance for societal survival, is a return to the Father. That return should be led by the Church. But that Church, or at least the Vatican, are suppressing those parts of the Church that are most God centered, such as the Carmelite Sisters of Fairfield, PA.
Really interesting, more of this!
Darryl Cooper is the man! Martyr Made is the best history podcast in the game. It's like a harder core hardcore history. Everyone needs to check it out. especially episode 19, "the anti humans".
You're spot on. I see Hardcore History as a pg-13 podcast now, compared to Martyr Made
Dear Tim, help me out if you can. I am writing about the 7 sorrows of Mary. Who was Pelbart? He related a revelation about St. John's vision of Mary from St. Elizabeth but who was Pelbart? Can't find anything on the net. Many thanks.
Great episode
The bass player from Phish has a podcast? Badass
This episode was super based
Is Darrell Cooper Catholic?
Yeah I was wondering the same thing. He’s displaying the same statue they have at CERN of shiva the pagan goddess. Interesting 🤔
I get the impression he might be more in the Jordan Peterson zone religiously, but further right politically.
Right at the start - was that the Hypnotoad?
Don't forget that Peter had a sword because Jesus TOLD them to bring swords Luke 22:36-38
I have no idea how anyone can think Christianity, uniquely, is literally true in its empriical claims about the divine when everything about it just looks like every other religion in terms of revelation and ways of knowing. Its just a syncretic result of several previous threads extant just before it appeared. Everything Christian about it was already in place in Hellenistic Judaism and Zoroastrianism. Christians just seem unaware of the source material.
I disagree re what Nietzsche was revolting against. There is a tradition in Germany of the sons of Lutheran pastors, e.g. Lessing. (Indeed, German Englightment was mostly carried on by the sons of pastors, this being the reason that it was not so radical like in France.) I would view N's problematic within the Lutheran tradition of the "freedom of the will", itself a version of the Ocham's and nominalism's God of almighty WILL. Wishing nominalism, what (= essence) IS (Sein, esse, to be, être, ser), is a function of what the (divine) will choses to be--a metaphysics that reoccurs in postmodernism on to transgenderism. Nietzsche's obsession with the will is a function of 14th Century nominalist Catholicism as it came into Germany and influenced Luther. Luther rejected in a m post radical way any role of the will re salvation. I suggest obtaining and reading Michael Allen Gillespie's The Theological Origins of Modernity (2008). Your understanding of the "big change", i.e., the birth of modernity, will change. As to German Idealism, specifically Fichte, the will plays a similar role, indeed, Marx' critique of capitalism is directly connect with his effective acceptance of the "will" a la Ficthe. Hegel, in my judgment, sought to reinstate the will under reason's rule, hence your demonization of Hegel is not correct. What the "left" made of Hegelianism after his death, is in many ways a rejection of Hegel's synthesis and a return to the will as the source of being (esse, etc.) Marxism is a triumph of Fichte, not of Hegel.
.
Thank you for an intellectual discussion, it is rare nowadays,
Prof. Leonard Wessell (ret.)
Bonn, Germany
PS As much as I find worthy the philosophical thinking Aristotle and Aquinas, etc., it fails as a metaphysics. Why? Realism! But then, I am an ontological idealist (I am writing a book on it now) and I am sure that none of you know what that self-designation means.
Guten Tag Herr Wessell, möglicherweise fasse den Schluss Ihrer Nachricht falsch auf, aber ich finde es schade, dass Sie einen nachdenklichen Kommentar verfassen, und diesen dann mit einem Satz beenden, der, so scheint es mir, maßlose Arroganz verrät. Selbst wenn die Herren im Video Ihre Selbstbezeichnung nicht kennen, tun Sie sich keinen Gefallen es in dieser Weise zu äußern.
@@donpaco6536 Bald genug werde ich zwei Bücher veröffentlichen, worin ich das Thema ausführlich bespreche. Ich bin ein "ontological idealist", was bedeutet, daß ich ernsthafte Fehler in der philosophischen Richtung "Realismus" finde. Gordon und andere versuchen, oft zu energisch, "Thomism" als DIE und die EINZIGE richtige Philosophie der Katholischen Kirche aufzuzwingen. (Aus anderen Gründen hat der Jesuit Bernard Lonergan die oft starre Philosophie der Kirche vernichtend kritisiert.) Ich versuche, die Thomisten zu provozieren, damit wir ins Gespräch mit einander kommen. Vergebens! T. Gordon ist philosophisch gebildet, ein erwachsener Mann; es ist klar, er kann er verkraften. Bitte, seien Sie vorsichtig mit Ihren "ad-hominem"-Beleidigungen. Das ist nicht die Art und Weise, wie man mit einem alten Prof. Dr. Dr. Dr. Wer-auch-immer umgehen sollte; sogar kommt es mir als unwürdig vor und, ja, vielleicht ein bißchen "arrogant". Eine Kritik ist akzeptierbar, eine Beleidigung nicht!
@@deluxieeee Ich habe Sie nicht beleidigt, sondern den Eindruck, den ihr Kommentar auf mich hatte, beschrieben.
@@donpaco6536 Wir stehen vor einem alten philosophischen Problem: Sein vs Schein. "Maßlose Arroganz" kommt mir vor als Prädikat, das mich qualifizieren sollte. Deshalb, "so scheint es mir", habe ich als eine "maßlose" Beleidigung. Kann wohl sein, daß Sie superempfindlich sind oder ...? Schein oder Sein?
Ich schätze Gordon und einige andere "traditionalists" sehr hoch, Dennoch scheint es mir, daß weder Gorden noch einige andere die wahre Lage der Kirche anerkennen wollen. Viganò bebautet: "Francis is a non-Catholic Pope!". Wenn so, das ist ein Thema, das wahrhaft erörtert werden sollte. Aber die Dinge sind nicht so. Ich trete hart auf, um hoffentlich ein Gespräch in Gang anzufangen--bisher vergebens.
I like eating romain lettuce.
when Jesus whipped the money lenders OUT from the temple for NOT giving interest free loans to the poor He was immediately identified as trouble maker
And crucified
Nietzsche is wrong I don't like him why he is promoted in Catholic churches?