Swiss Top Guns - F-5 Tiger and F-18 Hornet action in beautiful Meiringen, Switzerland [HD]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 179

  • @chrisg9627
    @chrisg9627 2 роки тому +42

    I have flown with a good many Swiss pilots during my airline career, and they often casually remarked that they were also flying for the airforce on these wonderful aircraft.
    Generally I don't do envy, but in this case I make an exception.
    Flying these jets around the stunning Swiss mountains must be something else: every pilots dream.
    There is a video of a Swiss Hunter climbing the Matterhorn somewhere on UA-cam ... enough to bring tears to your eyes :-)

    • @UKAviationMovies
      @UKAviationMovies  2 роки тому +9

      Thanks for the comment Chris. It's a bit of a cliche but the Swiss Alps truly are such a beautiful place. We're off to Axalp again this year, absolutely incredible place to watch and film these guys 👍

    • @chrisg9627
      @chrisg9627 2 роки тому +5

      @@UKAviationMovies Enjoy !!
      I should really get up there myself, it's just across the border for me.

    • @frankmccann29
      @frankmccann29 Рік тому

      Colonel Chuck Bortman was a friend. They MORE than met their goals back in the day and ecm fire control upgrades, with low radar visibility signatures it's dangerous again wit it's extreme maneuverability.

  • @4125131236323
    @4125131236323 2 роки тому +27

    Love the F-5 - great plane!

    • @jakerazmataz852
      @jakerazmataz852 Рік тому

      I saw a documentary, it was effective, cheap, easy to service, I think it was, as usual, a political decision not to go with it.

    • @4125131236323
      @4125131236323 Рік тому

      @@jakerazmataz852 I worked on them for several years in the Aggressors. - I was assigned to a WCS spot (Radar/Weapons Control Systems) but worked all systems - it's an excellent plane for close in dogfighting - very manueverable; but outside of that role it couldn't compete with the F16 or more advanced aircraft - it would never get close enough to use that superior close quarters manuevering. - It was perfect in the Aggressor role specifically because we were training pilots in those specific (close in dogfighting) skills.

    • @JamesJoyce12
      @JamesJoyce12 Місяць тому

      Completely useless in combat and prone to engine flame-outs during ACM - what is not to like?

  • @pauloxavier3802
    @pauloxavier3802 2 роки тому +6

    It is a fighter and interceptor aircraft, extremely reliable, highly maneuverable and encompasses a low cost and a high benefit, versatile and light, it can be used both in ground attacks and in air combat. The F-5 Tiger, without a doubt, is a great fighter plane that will be in the Hall of Fame of fighter aircraft. Remembering that currently the most modern versions of the F-5 in the world are in service with the Brazilian Air Force..

  • @deanfirnatine7814
    @deanfirnatine7814 2 роки тому +16

    Love the F-5 such a beautiful aircraft

    • @skunklover5725
      @skunklover5725 2 роки тому +2

      Hello From New Hampshire (USA)
      My son would totally agree with you sir, the Northrop F-5 is one of his favorite military aircraft of all time.

    • @vintageguitarz1
      @vintageguitarz1 2 роки тому

      Are your F'ing kidding, those F-5's were out of date in 1980! Even Taiwan uses their old ones as Park displays!

    • @skunklover5725
      @skunklover5725 2 роки тому +1

      @@vintageguitarz1: WELL - The B-52 Stratofortress Bomber is even older & it is still being used by the U.S.A.F, thanks to it's constant upgrade's over the years, so, why can't it be the same for the Northrop F-5 to have a longer service life.

  • @Robin6512
    @Robin6512 2 роки тому +1

    I so love the clean looks of the F5.

  • @solidlift
    @solidlift Рік тому +1

    Beautiful video!! The F-5 will always be one of my favorites. Thank you for sharing!

    • @UKAviationMovies
      @UKAviationMovies  Рік тому

      Glad you enjoyed it Robert. I will miss these jets when they retire as well :(

  • @Peorhum
    @Peorhum 2 роки тому +5

    and the award for best cleaned canopies goes to... the Swiss.

  • @canconservative8976
    @canconservative8976 2 роки тому +3

    4:44 ....perfection, in design ...and pilot execution.

    • @UKAviationMovies
      @UKAviationMovies  2 роки тому

      I’m with you there bud! Thanks for commenting 👍

  • @edtyler6444
    @edtyler6444 2 роки тому +2

    Both planes are fantastic fighters, and I would jump at the chance to fly either one. Thanks for the video.

    • @islandknight6105
      @islandknight6105 2 роки тому +1

      Me too. … and I’m not even a pilot 😳😳

  • @baraondal
    @baraondal 2 роки тому +5

    今さらF5のカッコよさにハマる

  • @javierdialba6536
    @javierdialba6536 2 роки тому +31

    F5 Tiger between the best combat jets builded ever, fast, big reaction driving angle, great upgraded capability, great weapon charge availability, etc. etc.

    • @shidongxu3410
      @shidongxu3410 2 роки тому +4

      F5 is old enough to be retired

    • @Jojooooooo
      @Jojooooooo 2 роки тому +2

      @@shidongxu3410 beyond old enough, that thing is ancient

    • @martinblank1484
      @martinblank1484 2 роки тому +6

      @@shidongxu3410 Airforces all over the world use "old" planes because they are STILL very capable in the right roll. Mig-21, B-52, TU-95, F-4...etc....

    • @bangdoll4500
      @bangdoll4500 2 роки тому +2

      It’s a good thing for a light fighter jet, but it’s never good to operate a fighter jet that’s clear, doesn’t fit for the BVR era, and it’s too old. Fall losses often occur when it gets old, and one F-5E pilot was retained in S.Korea a while ago.

    • @Jojooooooo
      @Jojooooooo 2 роки тому

      @@martinblank1484 maybe it's because they're broke lol

  • @BKraft2000
    @BKraft2000 2 роки тому +7

    The F-5E Tiger is a very good aircraft. with good maintenance, and some upgrades, it can serve very well for a long time.

    • @vintageguitarz1
      @vintageguitarz1 2 роки тому

      Are u kidding, the cheap ass Swiss are still fly ancient F-5's as their fighter jets!!? Those were out of date in 1980!
      USAF Capt retired 20th SOS, 27th Spl Ops Wing.

  • @riaanpotgieter475
    @riaanpotgieter475 2 роки тому +1

    F5 has been around for a long time, still great!!

    • @UKAviationMovies
      @UKAviationMovies  2 роки тому

      Absolutely. I’ve just come back from Greece where I was shooting their F-4 Phantoms. Also a really old jet but man are they cool!!!! :) thanks for the comment 😎

  • @Hunter_J-4015
    @Hunter_J-4015 2 роки тому +2

    fantastic video thank you very much !

  • @lauropletsch5905
    @lauropletsch5905 2 роки тому +6

    O Brasil possui os melhores F5 do mundo . 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 2 роки тому +5

    Love to be flying the F-5

  • @atunaco
    @atunaco 2 роки тому +2

    That sound... I haven't heard it in years... it's recorded so well I can almost smell the kerosene.

  • @robertmorey4104
    @robertmorey4104 2 роки тому +4

    Those Mig 28s are really cool. I didn't realize they change the angle of attack for takeoff with the Hydraulic nose wheel lift.

  • @GrimReaper-wz9me
    @GrimReaper-wz9me 2 роки тому +4

    !!!FANTASTIC!!!
    Every single video that you post of these Swiss F-5s & Hornets is perfect! Great closeup of the F-5s hiking the nose gear. But "097" had me worried. I was waiting for him to declare that his a/c was U/S and to taxi back to his shelter? Do you happen to know what this a/c's engine problems were?
    And interesting low light conditions? But still laser sharp focus and definition! It's like I am looking out my front window for goodness sakes!
    Cheers! 🇨🇦🍺🇨🇦🍺🇨🇦

    • @thomaspluss4784
      @thomaspluss4784 2 роки тому +1

      looks like an afterburner problem to me. The RH exhaust tube is more of an orange colour, the normal afterburner flame colour is blue (visible at 4:17)

  • @juanpaologonzales5682
    @juanpaologonzales5682 Рік тому +1

    That’s the smoothest F18 landing

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 2 роки тому +4

    Love the F-18s

  • @cybeliometalbest25
    @cybeliometalbest25 2 роки тому +2

    Perfect video ! The Tiger F-5F biplace is too "sexy".

  • @hugocheng6243
    @hugocheng6243 2 роки тому +1

    Comparing to my country swiss F-5 looks clean and well maintained

  • @mr.obvious4371
    @mr.obvious4371 2 роки тому +4

    Those machines are so clean looks like you all rubbed it with a diaper what a fine example !

  • @phoenixsui
    @phoenixsui 2 роки тому +1

    Crazy difference i feel between the acceleration of the FA-18 compared to the F-5. Love the looks of both.

    • @UKAviationMovies
      @UKAviationMovies  2 роки тому +1

      Absolutely bud. Despite the F-18 being so much bigger and so much heavier too. Nice observation 👍👌

  • @andreferro4618
    @andreferro4618 2 роки тому +8

    GREAT VIDEO!
    That take off angle of attack adjustment through the front landing gear suspension was a new information for me...
    Does anybody know how are those F5s comparing to the Brazilian Air Force ones?
    Greetings from Brazil.

    • @xxx_phantom_xxxw_t_a9479
      @xxx_phantom_xxxw_t_a9479 2 роки тому +1

      You mean the Brazilian Tiger F-5E to the Swiss Tiger F-5E? Theoretically the same, practically I know that the Swiss army develops changes themselves from time to time, so there is rarely anything like the normal series. For example, as far as I know, the F/A-18 flies with a different or adapted software.

  • @stevenbatley8666
    @stevenbatley8666 2 роки тому

    That Tiger looks a mean machine!

  • @philipmoll7459
    @philipmoll7459 Рік тому +1

    The f-5 still looks amazing to this day

    • @UKAviationMovies
      @UKAviationMovies  Рік тому +1

      It really does. One of those rare jets that looks as good as a twin stick as it does as a single, like the Mirage 2000 👍

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 2 роки тому +2

    Of course To be a RIO officer in both fighters would be terrific

  • @Matheus-hm9kb
    @Matheus-hm9kb 2 роки тому +1

    Great video

  • @CuecaFioDental
    @CuecaFioDental 2 роки тому +2

    Pode até ser antigo, mas que é bonito, ele é sim!

  • @thomasreid8681
    @thomasreid8681 2 роки тому +2

    those mig28's look awesome

  • @guilaoguilasso
    @guilaoguilasso 2 роки тому +2

    F 5 é um avião muito bonito e muito bom e versátil. No Brasil os F 5 ainda estão voando a pleno, porém já irão começar a parar gradativamente assim que os novos F-39 forem chegando este ano.

  • @AwesomeNinja1027
    @AwesomeNinja1027 2 роки тому

    the F-5E Tiger use to be the main fleet aircraft of the Philippine Air Force. but soon parts were no longer available. the last one has been decommissioned six years ago.

  • @vomoreno
    @vomoreno 2 роки тому +1

    F-5 used in Brazil too

  • @glennllewellyn7369
    @glennllewellyn7369 2 роки тому

    Nice mate.
    Australia

  • @iliasmetalworks
    @iliasmetalworks Рік тому +2

    You can't argue with that... the F5 is still sexy.

  • @jeffstrom164
    @jeffstrom164 2 роки тому +3

    I love the F 5 tigers. I think the US missed a step by not employing them.

    • @peterresetz1960
      @peterresetz1960 2 роки тому

      The F-5 was introduced during the Vietnam War. It didn’t carry enough ground ordinance compared to the F-4, F-105, A-6, and A-7. Also compared to a Mig-21, in a dog fight, the F-5 was agile, but the engines were something under powered and if the F-5 lost energy, the only way to recover was to dive.
      Oddly the F-5 was leased to the South Vietnamese AF. Also the U.S. Navy Top Gum school I believe use the F-5 as aggressor aircraft.

    • @jeffstrom164
      @jeffstrom164 2 роки тому +2

      @@peterresetz1960 The f 5 didn't need to carry ground ordinance, it was an interceptor. As to the engines, had the US adopted the plane the engines would have been upgraded, just like we fix deficiencies in all the airframes we use. Then we'd festooned it with bombs, like we do the f15s. But even if we couldn't, only about 23 percent of enemy pilots downed were as a result of guns. The rest were downed by missiles and a super agile plane that is slightly underpowered is a good fit for that. Just keep the nose on target to guide the missile. No, nothing wrong with the F 5 that some tlc couldn't fix. There's a reason they are only now being retired. Cheap, rugged, agile, fast, and easy to fly, the f 5 was an amazing plane for its time.

  • @pokrishkinru3893
    @pokrishkinru3893 2 роки тому +4

    F-5E 👍 from Russia 🇷🇺

  • @gustavofuentes7744
    @gustavofuentes7744 2 роки тому +1

    Here in Chile us air force have f5 tiger

  • @UKAviationMovies
    @UKAviationMovies  Рік тому

    If you enjoy the video don't forget to hit that like button 👍😎

  • @frankmccann29
    @frankmccann29 Рік тому +1

    Trade notes with the US Marines fighter wing with F5s

  • @Mathes48149
    @Mathes48149 2 роки тому

    Nice one ! :-)

  • @TWARDOWSKY.
    @TWARDOWSKY. 2 роки тому +2

    What kind of MSFS add on is this, very realistic

  • @billyhillk5726
    @billyhillk5726 2 роки тому

    I have a question. Why do these F-5's bob up & down at the nose gear prior to takeoff ?

  • @MrLondonphoenix
    @MrLondonphoenix 2 роки тому

    are these planes armed during this excercise? or are they just carry fake sidewinders? are the tigers from the patrouille suisse doing as well ..hot missions for the airforce..? i hoped so much, that pilatus would have come up with at jetplane to replace the oldtimer tiger. a pc 25... short start and landings, all weather, fast, cheaper, homemade. obviously not to compete against a f35. just a solid, agile airpolice plane with very flexible functions. a bit of a warthog, f16 and a f18

  • @chrisskywalker6079
    @chrisskywalker6079 2 роки тому +1

    F-16 and A-10 that's all you need👍🏻😊

  • @dalibors5391
    @dalibors5391 2 роки тому

    F5 i F18 odlični avioni fajteri

  • @bobfeller604
    @bobfeller604 2 роки тому +3

    Too bad they're not flying the F-20, a great plane that should have been built.

    • @martinblank1484
      @martinblank1484 2 роки тому

      The F-16 was a better choice for most but should have been on the "must buy" of most 2nd/3rd world nations as the F5/20 was perfect for them.

  • @strikezero01
    @strikezero01 2 роки тому +1

    F-5 still the best first jet

  • @kaffeetasse2461
    @kaffeetasse2461 2 роки тому

    die dinger sind so klein, die kommen ohne haengebauchzusatztanks keinen meter.
    wo haben die eigentlich ihre internen tanks? in der ultraschmalen tragflaeche bestimmt nicht.
    aber schoene klassische form haben die beiden f5 und f18.
    hatte ich beide mal als plastikmodell.

  • @m.w.designingcompany418
    @m.w.designingcompany418 2 роки тому

    Correction - that's not a Hornet that's the normal F-18

  • @cipanzers
    @cipanzers 2 роки тому

    Sadly our rmaf F5E/F RF5E already retired long time ago...😢

  • @stingingmetal9648
    @stingingmetal9648 2 роки тому

    Canada should buy/build a fleet of f-5s

  • @mebf1093
    @mebf1093 2 роки тому +2

    f5 and f18 is the same but the f18 is more advance more manurable and better its like father and son

    • @martinblank1484
      @martinblank1484 2 роки тому

      They are 100% not "the same"...totally different platforms.

    • @4125131236323
      @4125131236323 Рік тому

      the F5 and T38 are almost identical but neither of them are 'the same' as an F18... seriously... not even close...

  • @user-ru8ko8kn5u
    @user-ru8ko8kn5u 8 місяців тому

    พิกัดทิ้งระเบิดรัฐภา ตึกสร้างใหม่แถวๆเกียกกายครับ

  • @erimacena1002
    @erimacena1002 2 роки тому

    Tem q deixar eles não aposenta já q tem poucos grip

  • @igortom2103
    @igortom2103 2 роки тому

    А если попасть, хоть из пистолета, в этот бак топлива под корпусом... останется топ оружием Швейцарии?)

  • @kaylee9069
    @kaylee9069 2 роки тому +2

    The dreadful "Mig-28"

  • @franciscogil6798
    @franciscogil6798 2 роки тому

    The F-5 should return as drones with lasers ..gaultin and smart missiles

  • @tystseng
    @tystseng Рік тому +1

    同樣是F-5EF 台灣維修保養不如瑞士,他們的戰機狀況一直保持最佳戰力!

    • @UKAviationMovies
      @UKAviationMovies  Рік тому

      Swiss aircraft are always pristine it seems! I'd love to see a Taiwanese F-5. I love their colour scheme!

  • @Arcadif
    @Arcadif 2 роки тому +1

    Did you mean MIG-28 ?

  • @robshirewood5060
    @robshirewood5060 Рік тому

    what is the significance of the red missile and belly tank?

  • @JonHuhnMedical
    @JonHuhnMedical 2 роки тому

    Did the F5 get a new nose ?

  • @joshuatemplado2578
    @joshuatemplado2578 2 роки тому +1

    Is F5 still relevant today?

    • @datmanz5890
      @datmanz5890 2 роки тому +2

      Not in engine performance no, but retrofitted F-5s have the radar and missiles to still pose a big threat, especially in the mountains.

    • @martinblank1484
      @martinblank1484 2 роки тому

      It's roll dependent. For the price, they are great for smaller poor nations facing older planes. Against a modern airfare or air defense, no.

  • @vandiffchen8994
    @vandiffchen8994 9 місяців тому +1

    台灣的F5生產線的關閉是非常可惜的。

  • @user-ol1qm9ey7g
    @user-ol1qm9ey7g 2 роки тому +1

    ฉันว่าเครื่องบิน F5 ตัวที่อัพเกรดเต็มที่ฉันว่าสู้เครื่องบินจากค่ายรัสเซียได้ทุกรุ่นเพราะอะไรเพราะความลับมันรั่วไหลเครื่องบินรัสเซียโดนโลกตะวันตกโจรกรรมข้อมูลจนหมด

    • @user-ol1qm9ey7g
      @user-ol1qm9ey7g 2 роки тому

      ตอนแรกรัฐบาลรัสเซียอาจจะไม่เชื่อข่าวนี้พอเข้าสู่สงครามยูเครนจริงๆเขารู้ตัวแล้วว่าข้อมูลเขาโดนล้วงจารกรรมจนหมดไม่เหลือจริงๆตัวที่ดีที่สุดของเขาสามารถโดนล็อคเป้าหมายได้เพราะคลื่นสัญญาณมันไม่เป็นความลับ

  • @alcibiadesludena5173
    @alcibiadesludena5173 2 роки тому +1

    Mig 28

  • @smethe2153
    @smethe2153 2 роки тому

    i thought this was a game

  • @deedsmillar6056
    @deedsmillar6056 2 роки тому

    couldnt thery find a bigger fuel tank?

    • @4125131236323
      @4125131236323 Рік тому

      they can and often do have a center line fuel tank attached for longer flights. (plus they can do aerial refueling)

  • @tomatojuices5340
    @tomatojuices5340 2 роки тому

    I thought it was a game

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 2 роки тому +2

    Tiger Shark what they used to call them

    • @davidknight6981
      @davidknight6981 2 роки тому +1

      Actually, Northrop never built the Tiger Shark. The Tiger Shark would have been designated F-20. It was supposed to be an upgrade if the F-5. Prototype examples of the F-20 are beautiful aircraft.

    • @andreferro4618
      @andreferro4618 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@davidknight6981 You are right.
      General Charles Yeager tested the F20 and considered it a better aircraft than the F16 by that time.
      Greetings from Brazil.

    • @davidknight6981
      @davidknight6981 2 роки тому +1

      @@andreferro4618 Greetings Andre.

    • @ccrider8483
      @ccrider8483 2 роки тому +1

      @@andreferro4618 Yeager was on the payroll so he may not have been totally objective. My understanding is that the F5/F20 could not carry as much of a load as the F16. The F5-20 may be really sexy looking high performance airplane but these type of planes are basically mobile weapon platforms.

    • @andreferro4618
      @andreferro4618 2 роки тому +1

      @@ccrider8483 I see your point.
      It makes sense.

  • @user-wh6hl4gv4j
    @user-wh6hl4gv4j 2 роки тому

    👍

  • @chrismair8161
    @chrismair8161 2 роки тому

    F-5 a McConnell Douglas or an F-18-E. Purdy sure Avionics would be to Lockeed Martin. See first shoot first at speed.

  • @zogzog1063
    @zogzog1063 2 роки тому

    Nice for adolescents.

  • @youngcthomaspaik2879
    @youngcthomaspaik2879 2 роки тому

    Are they using F-5???? Why they are still torturing the grandfa fighter?

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 2 роки тому +3

    You can’t flare the F-5s I see them that you got to fly them down to the runway at a point or the numbers

  • @alexlo7708
    @alexlo7708 2 роки тому

    Seems F5 has landing speed higher than F18.

    • @martinblank1484
      @martinblank1484 2 роки тому

      Seem F5s don't land on carriers.

    • @alexlo7708
      @alexlo7708 2 роки тому

      @@martinblank1484 I see catapult hook still on nose wheel of this Swiss F18.

    • @martinblank1484
      @martinblank1484 2 роки тому

      @@alexlo7708 Funny...wonder why they leave it on...

    • @alexlo7708
      @alexlo7708 2 роки тому

      @@martinblank1484 Dunno

  • @philipmoll7459
    @philipmoll7459 Рік тому +1

    Too bad the f-20 was never made

  • @marvincarlsen2701
    @marvincarlsen2701 2 роки тому

    So I downloaded your video, what are you gonna do about it, clown?

  • @user-ru8ko8kn5u
    @user-ru8ko8kn5u 8 місяців тому

    ค่ายทหารออกห้างทหารออกจากฐานทัพอนุญาตและอนุมัติครับ

  • @selimemini4503
    @selimemini4503 4 місяці тому

    Ktu sasht swiss ktu asht slovenia shupli kamen

  • @Omegaspeedmaster69
    @Omegaspeedmaster69 2 роки тому

    And what are the chances of a swiss fighter pilot being shot down by enemy fire?😂

  • @theolewell7535
    @theolewell7535 2 роки тому

    :)

  • @user-te3dj1qp5f
    @user-te3dj1qp5f 2 роки тому

    개 고물!

  • @michaelcasia7264
    @michaelcasia7264 2 роки тому

    f5 is small but terrible

  • @postergmail6202
    @postergmail6202 2 роки тому

    The Swiss need fighters like a fish needs a bicycle.

  • @UpsheetscreekWOapaddle
    @UpsheetscreekWOapaddle 2 роки тому +2

    Switzerland IS green 💚 😉👍
    They seem to be well maintained. Welcome to OTAN
    Slava Ukraini 👍

  • @vintageguitarz1
    @vintageguitarz1 2 роки тому

    Are u kidding, the cheap ass Swiss are still fly ancient F-5's as their fighter jets!!?
    USAF Capt retired 20th SOS, 27th Spl Ops Wing.

    • @patrickbateman529
      @patrickbateman529 2 роки тому

      They've ordered F-35s, but they don't really need advanced jets. Or any jets at all.

    • @UKAviationMovies
      @UKAviationMovies  2 роки тому

      Thanks for your service in the 20th SOS. I grew up seeing MH-53s around US installations around the U.K. Beautiful machine 😎