MIG-29 VS F-22 Raptor breathtaking vertical climb take offs. WARNING ! LOUD VIDEO

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @bitofapickle
    @bitofapickle 4 роки тому +892

    No matter how loud this jets are you'll always hear some annoying kid screaming

    • @rudolfabelin383
      @rudolfabelin383 4 роки тому +17

      LOL

    • @artysanmobile
      @artysanmobile 4 роки тому +21

      Barbarie Alexandru Interesting that the joyful sound of a child’s voice is annoying, next to the awesome roar of a machine of death.

    • @bitofapickle
      @bitofapickle 4 роки тому +22

      @@artysanmobile not everyone likes kids :)

    • @artysanmobile
      @artysanmobile 4 роки тому +16

      Barbarie Alexandru And yet, every single one of those people was a child. It is a pathology to dislike children, revealing a large, irreparable gap in intellect.

    • @rudolfabelin383
      @rudolfabelin383 4 роки тому +8

      @@artysanmobile I pretty sure this was meant as a joke, ever watched Monty Python?

  • @jayyoutube8790
    @jayyoutube8790 8 років тому +2071

    The Mig pilot just puts black tape over the "check engine" light and goes for it..

    • @pushpushlambert8079
      @pushpushlambert8079 6 років тому +44

      Lmfao ... That is funny though 👍

    • @miked815
      @miked815 6 років тому +87

      @Yo Ming of course it does... it has about 34 of them

    • @pilotblue6535
      @pilotblue6535 6 років тому +4

      The air show smoke kept cutting out! I could only see them for 30 miles

    • @Joetrout
      @Joetrout 6 років тому +20

      jon doe they don’t even have a computer they are still using chevy 4 barrel quadrajets!

    • @robburgundy9539
      @robburgundy9539 6 років тому +4

      Yo Ming r/wooooosh

  • @TheMurrblake
    @TheMurrblake 4 роки тому +47

    MiG low pass at 2:00 set the grass on fire. That is badass!

  • @festol1
    @festol1 6 років тому +1191

    Just relaxing and enjoying the internet 'experts' comments about the matter ;)

    • @alone_mask
      @alone_mask 5 років тому +27

      They are future scientists 😂😂

    • @2ntenz
      @2ntenz 4 роки тому +9

      Experts cause some of us are aerospace enginers

    • @billyhelms7735
      @billyhelms7735 4 роки тому +7

      ITS NOT JUST A COMMENT IT'S A FACT

    • @LimitlessTraveller
      @LimitlessTraveller 4 роки тому +16

      the internet University half knowledge engineers know all about f22 more than US air firce vice versa Russian mig29...

    • @tomkrueger6556
      @tomkrueger6556 4 роки тому +9

      some of people who comments are real pilots amd enginers from military you fuck! 😂😂😂👍

  • @xiaoli7008
    @xiaoli7008 8 років тому +2097

    Is MG29 burning coal or wood?

    • @Rx330lexuslover
      @Rx330lexuslover 8 років тому +153

      Xiao Li I think the mg29 is rolling coal like the Diesel trucks 😂

    • @rwpla
      @rwpla 8 років тому +64

      it needs just that to beat the f22 :P

    • @Venom86pl
      @Venom86pl 8 років тому +213

      Vodka 80%+++ :D

    • @Wess65GR
      @Wess65GR 8 років тому +57

      Xiao Li, attempt to sound intelligent?

    • @HiTecHoBo
      @HiTecHoBo 8 років тому +35

      Xiao Li Vodka.

  • @garty2
    @garty2 4 роки тому +129

    I love how MiGs, Sukhois, Tupolevs, etc. have this sort of raw, unfinished look to them, it’s very cool

    • @curvedbredd5190
      @curvedbredd5190 4 роки тому +29

      I don't think it's just a look

    • @jacksoncude9824
      @jacksoncude9824 4 роки тому +12

      probably not on purpose

    • @andyman8630
      @andyman8630 4 роки тому +6

      Russian fighters are built like tanks, US fighters are built like a Ferrari

    • @powerstroketurbo95
      @powerstroketurbo95 4 роки тому +10

      @@andyman8630 A fighter jet isn't supposed to be a tank....you aren't supposed to get hit 😂

    • @andyman8630
      @andyman8630 4 роки тому +1

      @@powerstroketurbo95
      and yet Russian fighters are built like tanks

  • @MrWhitemare
    @MrWhitemare 7 років тому +383

    Raptor is just an incredible machine , mig is timeless and amazing as well .

    • @jimbeaux89
      @jimbeaux89 4 роки тому +1

      Well said

    • @deltacharlieromeo8252
      @deltacharlieromeo8252 4 роки тому +1

      @Theonlyonestanding tangina mo gago

    • @abdmobashir3494
      @abdmobashir3494 4 роки тому +7

      @Theonlyonestanding you can keep your dumb mouth shut about Mig 29

    • @fubarmofo6969
      @fubarmofo6969 4 роки тому +5

      Abd Mobashir u mean the massive piece of shit mig? Just like every mig ever made?

    • @suraiyaislam4974
      @suraiyaislam4974 4 роки тому +8

      @@fubarmofo6969 Are you talking about yourself?

  • @TheHDAviation
    @TheHDAviation 8 років тому +161

    Awesome footage of these two impressive fighters, another great video!

  • @DameMediaVids
    @DameMediaVids 4 роки тому +36

    Man to me, I think it's just a breathtaking sight to see the mighty F 22 stand up in vertical.

  • @eshgholah
    @eshgholah 8 років тому +408

    Right away I have to say that it is a comparison without any sense. These two planes are a couple of generations apart.

    • @astro_119
      @astro_119 7 років тому +29

      Alex Martinson they're only one generation apart...

    • @eshgholah
      @eshgholah 7 років тому +46

      There is another generation in between and that is 4++. Hence using the word "couple of generations".

    • @maciekostrowski4633
      @maciekostrowski4633 7 років тому +19

      Quite right... Yet the MiG is still fine, isn't it?

    • @cod6guy12
      @cod6guy12 7 років тому +19

      Aircrafts have their limits... Whether its generation 3, 4, 4+ or 5 they aren't powered by magic. They have physical limitations and always will.

    • @GraditelMacedonia
      @GraditelMacedonia 6 років тому +15

      True... MIG 29 First flight 1978...

  • @COCHISE710226
    @COCHISE710226 6 років тому +131

    Mig 29 captain Adrian Rojek Polish Air Force

    • @novelvlog1562
      @novelvlog1562 4 роки тому +2

      Tell him he is awesome

    • @hapech
      @hapech 4 роки тому +7

      @MercyReaper there were given in soo bad shape, that most of them were going for parts

    • @dmitrikaljuznoi1323
      @dmitrikaljuznoi1323 4 роки тому +5

      @MercyReaper Poland also bought all of the Czech ones and they had their own too. So not all of them are ex german

    • @falkenlaser
      @falkenlaser 4 роки тому +1

      Tell him she should really get his engine’s exhaust checked out.

    • @COCHISE710226
      @COCHISE710226 4 роки тому +2

      @@dmitrikaljuznoi1323 Yes, but first 12 MIG's Poland bought straight from USSR

  • @frrus7327
    @frrus7327 4 роки тому +74

    Man, that mig is past it's oil change

    • @lees.4084
      @lees.4084 4 роки тому +3

      That IS its oil change....
      Has the self-changing oil feature.

    • @bazzhm1447
      @bazzhm1447 3 роки тому

      After all hiperbolic naratives to help m29 raise up on internet. She choose to not continue

    • @Cockalicious
      @Cockalicious Рік тому +1

      ​@@lees.4084 just dumps it in the air

  • @douhgremuro150
    @douhgremuro150 6 років тому +296

    1:56 volkswagen detected

    • @DudeGuyWho
      @DudeGuyWho 4 роки тому +3

      Slug bug!

    • @rcryan7shmee
      @rcryan7shmee 4 роки тому

      Don’t get it

    • @ervinzefi8662
      @ervinzefi8662 4 роки тому +4

      Ryan Coffman diesel smoke from the tdi engines that Volkswagen had problems here in the US . The MIG smoked like a diesel Volkswagen car.

    • @zelenizub2036
      @zelenizub2036 4 роки тому

      @@ervinzefi8662 epa is the problem TDI were best engines you can get in USA at the time.

    • @ervinzefi8662
      @ervinzefi8662 4 роки тому

      zeleni zub I know. I own a Q7 TDi.

  • @whatthedeuce091
    @whatthedeuce091 4 роки тому +83

    I had the pleasure of watching an F-22 fly at an airshow at CFB Cold Lake in Canada (my home town) a couple years ago. It's rare for Canadians to see these things fly. I couldn't believe how loud it was! And the maneuvers it can do... breath-taking.

    • @devonwoodman3350
      @devonwoodman3350 3 роки тому +3

      I remember watching the jets take off as a kid when I lived up in cold lake. It’s amazing to see in person

    • @osrikking8785
      @osrikking8785 2 роки тому +2

      I saw one from my boat at the Toronto Air Show (CNE) about 10 or 12 years ago - was just amazing! A friend of mine happened to have gone into his office in Toronto on that day (Labour Day Monday) and was stuck on the Gardiner Expressway because everyone had stopped to watch the F-22 do its thing! That aircraft appears to defy the laws of physics.

    • @Cynsham
      @Cynsham 2 роки тому +3

      There is a reason that we decided to make a law that says we can't lease or sell any F-22's to any other country, not even allies. They are that important

    • @nunyabusiness6356
      @nunyabusiness6356 2 роки тому +1

      I lived in cold lake when young my dad was on assignment at what was then medley base form Australia LOVED IT!!
      Go the medley marlins 👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻

    • @johnarnold893
      @johnarnold893 Рік тому

      @@Cynsham They're becoming obsolete rapidly. The F-35 has more advanced tech and I wouldn't want to be an F-22 pilot being hunted by an F-35.

  • @maithem212
    @maithem212 4 роки тому +713

    Russian "Smoke screen" stealth technology engaged

    • @wysciguwa
      @wysciguwa 4 роки тому +13

      xD But the good information is the Polish Się Force bought F-35

    • @icyyy356
      @icyyy356 4 роки тому +6

      Don't call it smoke screen... Let's see in dog fight

    • @CantPickTheNameIwant
      @CantPickTheNameIwant 4 роки тому +33

      Russia defined state-of-the-art fuel technology for its Mig-29s - firewood.

    • @davidmathes6730
      @davidmathes6730 4 роки тому +7

      It runs on diesel haha, it would be eating alive by the raptor in a dog fight as well.

    • @emilyhofland8219
      @emilyhofland8219 4 роки тому +6

      Its said that the smoking engines on them are actually helpful if they are being chased.

  • @brihellforge3569
    @brihellforge3569 4 роки тому +175

    You'd think those migs were made by Volkswagen with their emissions

    • @deerlord2363
      @deerlord2363 4 роки тому +2

      LOL 🤣

    • @signa-tune2823
      @signa-tune2823 4 роки тому +1

      What? Hahaha

    • @lyndonanderson2900
      @lyndonanderson2900 4 роки тому +3

      My 73 Beatle smoked just like this MiG lol

    • @AlexandruVataman
      @AlexandruVataman 3 роки тому +3

      Those migs are almost 40 years old

    • @T410ce
      @T410ce 3 роки тому

      Everyone knows that Russian aircraft all use diesel instead of Jet fuel.

  • @svenschwingel8632
    @svenschwingel8632 6 років тому +18

    Given the resources and technology that the USSR had at its disposal back in the late 70's and early 80's, the MiG-29/SU-27 family truly are aerodynamic masterpieces. And the fact that they consequently kept improving the trusted designs shows a good level of efficiency. The Raptor is at least a whole generation ahead but like the F-15/F-16, these old russian jets are still competitive, especially in numbers.

    • @johnarnold893
      @johnarnold893 Рік тому +1

      Right, that's why they stay away from Ukraine.

    • @josue_kay
      @josue_kay Рік тому

      ​@@johnarnold893 You should go to Ukraine and find out

  • @seandarager
    @seandarager 4 роки тому +25

    wearing my headphone on lowest volume
    watching this before sleep
    this sounds quite calm

  • @spadgm
    @spadgm 8 років тому +31

    Once again top quality filming, almost feel like I am watching in person!

  • @tangledline
    @tangledline 8 років тому +167

    Awesome video! 21 people like helicopters...lol.

    • @cluelessnerd2271
      @cluelessnerd2271 8 років тому +1

      no, i like nismo . . . btw dont hate me, im not the one with the dislike button.

    • @almightykeys4734
      @almightykeys4734 8 років тому

      Clueless Nerd Z squaad!

    • @dragonraopen2604
      @dragonraopen2604 8 років тому +1

      tangled Line hahaha xD

    • @marshallallensmith
      @marshallallensmith 7 років тому

      Uhm that makes no sense. I am a helo pilot and I love fighter jets.

    • @tangledline
      @tangledline 7 років тому +1

      Of course it makes sense..You just have no sense of humor.

  • @tmango78
    @tmango78 4 роки тому +256

    No way would they allow that Mig to fly in California.

    • @lunkerpond9765
      @lunkerpond9765 4 роки тому +18

      They fly almost daily in California. NASA has an entire fleet of aircraft at Edwards AFB.

    • @raidzor5452
      @raidzor5452 4 роки тому +5

      Why? It’s czech airforce, unarmed.

    • @raidzor5452
      @raidzor5452 4 роки тому

      R32639 oh shit yes the roundel

    • @marcofava
      @marcofava 4 роки тому +3

      The US Airforce has Mig 29's for dissimilar combat training

    • @trilexi
      @trilexi 4 роки тому +11

      Seems like no one understood the joke

  • @iwashere2365
    @iwashere2365 5 років тому +473

    MiG 29 DPF - Diesel Particulate Filter need cleaning.

    • @egemensuzgun4208
      @egemensuzgun4208 4 роки тому +7

      hahahahahahh

    • @bradstrayer485
      @bradstrayer485 4 роки тому +5

      Must of ran out of def fluid.

    • @iwashere2365
      @iwashere2365 4 роки тому +4

      @Herschey's Nah... it won't be covered by warranty. It's a second hand. needs new gaskit too.

    • @TheLiamis
      @TheLiamis 4 роки тому +3

      Both suck balls m8, no V-tec yo.

    • @royhsieh4307
      @royhsieh4307 4 роки тому +2

      russian pilot: just add urea.

  • @lees.4084
    @lees.4084 7 років тому +25

    Wow, the Mig's engines are so much like old Phantoms with the early J79s.
    You can easily tell when they are under heavy dry power by the large amounts of smoke output.

    • @dannyboy5272
      @dannyboy5272 5 років тому +2

      Lee S. True very true. My Dad was a powerplant mechanic on the Phantom on the USS Forrestal (B DEVILERS (Pukin Dogs) CVA 59)through 1963-1967 and he always spoke of the tell tail trail of the J79. Those planes were heavy and mean but they went REAL fast in a dive!

    • @wallingnaga6563
      @wallingnaga6563 4 роки тому

      Yea the RD93S are smokey 😅

  • @wesleyhatem258
    @wesleyhatem258 4 роки тому +78

    Such incredible engineering. In awe every time I watch.

    • @matiasm.3124
      @matiasm.3124 4 роки тому +5

      The raptor is shit ... Check internet for all the fails it has.. no doubt that Rusia hace the better fighters

    • @SkySky-dk7si
      @SkySky-dk7si 4 роки тому +1

      One of the few comments that isn’t bashing in any means, finally!!

    • @raywilliams1477
      @raywilliams1477 3 роки тому

      The commie bastards steal all the plans for high performance air craft from the USA!!! Very little innovations. Just imatation!!!! To bad thay wouldn't let Patton go get um at the end of WW2. Then let McAuther go in 1950!!!! The world would be rite!!!! Proper order!!! What a shame!!!!!

  • @Erated78
    @Erated78 8 років тому +74

    My favorites are American built fighters but man those Migs are awesome.

    • @jimbeaux89
      @jimbeaux89 4 роки тому +9

      Erated78 right there with ya! Although I love my American fighters, you can’t deny the brilliance that is Russian built aircraft

    • @pavelt5732
      @pavelt5732 4 роки тому +3

      @@jimbeaux89 it is *Soviet* built.
      Big difference.

    • @jimbeaux89
      @jimbeaux89 4 роки тому

      Pavel T my mistake

    • @dominikstuchlik5856
      @dominikstuchlik5856 3 роки тому +2

      Mig29 is still produced (in russia), it was developed by russians in soviet russia, so don't really know what's the matter here.

  • @82raptor
    @82raptor 8 років тому +190

    Not a fair fight, that is how we like it here in the U.S.!

    • @bigd8155
      @bigd8155 7 років тому +3

      82raptor 😂😂😂😂🤣👍

    • @kendicus7640
      @kendicus7640 6 років тому +2

      Welp, how about i compare your "wildcats" with the Su-30

    • @braydenmcneal6709
      @braydenmcneal6709 6 років тому +3

      Kendicus not even a comparison, 2 completely different fighters, needs to be compared with the F-35, and it would be destroyed by that, and the F-22

    • @nickwaller3823
      @nickwaller3823 6 років тому +2

      Yeah I was gunna say, either one would destroy it before it was even known to be existent

    • @familiant72
      @familiant72 6 років тому +7

      nick waller yeh, a picture from Syrian airspace proof it. F22 is invisible only in theory.

  • @SealofPerfection
    @SealofPerfection 4 роки тому +19

    F-22 is just so impressive, especially in person. The moves it can make seem almost unnatural compared to other planes. And the takeoff distance displayed here is incredible. The 22 was in the air, gear up, before the 29 was remotely ready to raise its nose.

    • @billybob1773
      @billybob1773 4 роки тому +3

      Yet the MIG was climbing way faster looking at the clouds in the background, it might be more the fact it's a smaller plane as smaller always looks faster but very few modern planes can match the quoted rate of climb of the old MIG if quotes are to be believed

    • @xyzaero
      @xyzaero 3 роки тому

      I think it was a 10 second takeoff for the Raptor and 13 for the Mig 👍🏻

    • @SealofPerfection
      @SealofPerfection 3 роки тому +2

      @@billybob1773 It's an optical illusion. The MIG can't climb faster than a Raptor, nor can it come close to maneuvering like one.
      The Raptor can climb vertically until it runs out of fuel. And faster than the MIG.
      As I said, if you see the Raptor in person, it almost looks unnatural, the way it can move.

    • @dl7857
      @dl7857 2 роки тому

      @@SealofPerfection perhaps you’re correct , especially considering the age difference between the two jets. However it would have been more persuasive if you’ve shared your source of information rather than feelings from you past observations.

    • @SealofPerfection
      @SealofPerfection 2 роки тому +1

      @@dl7857 The specs on the planes are easy to look up.

  • @TiernanWilkinson
    @TiernanWilkinson 5 років тому +7

    Thanks for this; two amazing aircraft. Imo, the MiG-29 and F-22 are the best-looking modern fighters from East and West respectively, both amazing machines with many incredibly talented pilots, clearly.

  • @irfan123100
    @irfan123100 8 років тому +55

    Both planes look and sound amazing.

  • @spavatch
    @spavatch 4 роки тому +219

    - Greta Thunberg? - Eeerm, yes? - Mr Fulcrumieri sends his regards

    • @mobiusflammel9372
      @mobiusflammel9372 4 роки тому +6

      What is it with you guys and Greta?

    • @danquistberg7492
      @danquistberg7492 4 роки тому +1

      I don't get it

    • @mobiusflammel9372
      @mobiusflammel9372 4 роки тому +3

      @@danquistberg7492 Its a republican thing. I don't get it either.

    • @cadreauribe
      @cadreauribe 4 роки тому +10

      Greta does not aprove Mig engines.

    • @oscargrouch7962
      @oscargrouch7962 4 роки тому +21

      ​@@cadreauribe Greta never protests anything Russian or Chinese. Greta has nothing against the immense amount of pollution caused by Russian and Chinese jet engines. Greta is only concerned with the comparatively low amount of pollution caused by US and NATO jet engines.

  • @danahan01
    @danahan01 8 років тому +44

    That mig is a real smoke puker. An adversary pilot would be able to see that from 10 miles away!!

    • @fazecringey3840
      @fazecringey3840 5 років тому +1

      danahan01 And that would be the F-22 Raptor Pilots

    • @masoodjalal1152
      @masoodjalal1152 5 років тому +2

      FaZe Cringey yes other pilots don't have eyes I guess.. or F22 pilots have 40/20 because they are flying an F22./s

    • @Mickey-im3bg
      @Mickey-im3bg 4 роки тому

      Ridiculous

    • @visionpersistance
      @visionpersistance 4 роки тому +2

      Wow! Reminds me of the exhaust from a F-4 Phantom

    • @spavatch
      @spavatch 4 роки тому

      Laughs in R-77 missile range ;)

  • @hpwan2
    @hpwan2 8 років тому +46

    Awesome video! btw, looks like the diesel particulate filter in the Mig is due for a service tho..LOL

    • @kepszlok
      @kepszlok 8 років тому +6

      Hehe :) Btw russian / soviet engines used to smoke a lot, but the latest version (2001) of the RD33 engines are smokeless. They are built into the newer Mig's. This Mig on the video uses an older, smoky variant but that's the beauty of it. :)

    • @mickhobb5448
      @mickhobb5448 7 років тому

      I thought mig was a coal burner

    • @КлимСамгин-р6х
      @КлимСамгин-р6х 7 років тому

      coal burner smeasy will do for F22

    • @weasle2904
      @weasle2904 5 років тому

      @@kepszlok So it only took them 30 years to catch up to the US's standard engines?

    • @kepszlok
      @kepszlok 5 років тому

      @@weasle2904 RD33's should be compared to the F-14's TF30 engine.That engine was also a bit smokey, but not that much.
      The technology level of the soviet industry was always a problem for soviet engineers.

  • @eurokid83
    @eurokid83 8 років тому +409

    How to shoot down a mig-29 = follow the smoke show.

    • @delten-eleven1910
      @delten-eleven1910 7 років тому +18

      Barry The Chopper: Mig-29 bellows more smoke than the Vietnam era F-4 phantom.

    • @firestarter1943
      @firestarter1943 6 років тому

      ua-cam.com/video/dThO0tyFJmY/v-deo.html su 30

    • @DrittAdrAtta
      @DrittAdrAtta 6 років тому +29

      That's what US f-16 instructors and Polish f-16 pilots thought while training air combat monoeuvres against MiG-29s in Poland. I've read that during one 4vs4 engagement the Fulcrum drivers deployed one MiG-29 to send "smoke signals" as a bait, while the rest of the MiGs ambushed the chasing f-16s and wiped them out. In afterburner mode the MiG doesn't leave a smoke trail.

    • @pino9055
      @pino9055 6 років тому +1

      It's not how to shoot down a mig-29, it's how to shoot down any Mig they all leave the smoke trail...

    • @georgehunter2813
      @georgehunter2813 4 роки тому

      Thermal sensor imaging.

  • @vishaldeep5794
    @vishaldeep5794 5 років тому +41

    Mig-29:Can u do the Cobra?
    F-22:Cobra!What?
    Mig-29:😏I know the pain.

    • @ismailshahnawaz4976
      @ismailshahnawaz4976 5 років тому +1

      Chawal

    • @mariusstana8253
      @mariusstana8253 5 років тому

      rijad katardzic No,he can "t at the corect degree

    • @Cars-N-Jets
      @Cars-N-Jets 5 років тому

      Vishal Deep Can you be stealthy? No what's the pain? Can you Pull 9gs, no But what you can do in your Mig-29 is not efficient. And it's only powered by Dissel😂

    • @vishaldeep5794
      @vishaldeep5794 5 років тому +6

      @@Cars-N-Jets Hahah!It doesn't needs be stealthy in a state of war!Moreover it doesn't kill its own pilot due to Oxygen inbalance.That makes it a Flying Coffin!Killing its own pilot due to Oxygen deprivation!Felt the pain?

    • @zenolale8736
      @zenolale8736 5 років тому +2

      @rijad katardzic This is not a full Cobra of the F-22. The overhang at 120 ° is missing. It seems to be just over 90 ° and a slight increase in altitude also seems. The original Cobra does not gain height and is flown at 120 °.

  • @juddotto3660
    @juddotto3660 4 роки тому +13

    Just imagine how many marshmallows you can cook with those engines, you could have a party of at least. 100 marshmallow enthusiasts?

    • @lh7801
      @lh7801 4 роки тому +1

      Pffffffft. 100. Way way more than that. Like prob 105 or 106

  • @TheAselert
    @TheAselert 4 роки тому +82

    2:00 the MIG 29 put fire on the ground?!

    • @viggenpowerajs3758
      @viggenpowerajs3758 4 роки тому +6

      Lights from the other end of the runway

    • @jaredhallett3547
      @jaredhallett3547 4 роки тому +5

      ViggenPOWER AJS37 it’s not why cant you see them before? The colour and the way it behaves shows it’s fire...

    • @jwagner1993
      @jwagner1993 4 роки тому

      Looks like

    • @kovacmordus8899
      @kovacmordus8899 4 роки тому +5

      Ground troops: need air support
      Mig: empty on ammo
      Mig pilot:i got this, sets the enemy on 🔥

    • @linecraftman3907
      @linecraftman3907 4 роки тому

      no that's the f22

  • @88Mobius
    @88Mobius 4 роки тому +12

    You really can't appreciate how maneuverable an F-22 is until you see one in real life.

    • @Gus-pi9zq
      @Gus-pi9zq 2 роки тому

      I dont understand about thecnical of both, but what its the price of each one?

    • @Cars-N-Jets
      @Cars-N-Jets Рік тому

      Very true.

    • @Cars-N-Jets
      @Cars-N-Jets Рік тому

      @@Gus-pi9zqOne F22 alone is like 350-400 million dollars

  • @NigeUK007
    @NigeUK007 4 роки тому +4

    The 29 is such a good jet for its era, I have always admired it. The RB33 was a smokey engine... but that aside, this was its signature trademark we all know it for.

  • @himankan
    @himankan 7 років тому +88

    Why are people even comparing the capabilities of these two jets?
    If you want to then comepare F-22 with the PAK-FA, not MiG 29.
    MiG 29 is a 4+ gen jet.

    • @imredejony8330
      @imredejony8330 5 років тому +3

      Actually the mig 29 would be considered gen 4.5 because of vector thrust

    • @ivankuznetsov8177
      @ivankuznetsov8177 5 років тому +1

      Himankan Kashyap Sukhoi Su-57 (T-50)

    • @stevem2323
      @stevem2323 5 років тому +27

      @Philip Adzomani Dude that is beyond retarded.

    • @huhuhuhuhuhmomomomo3599
      @huhuhuhuhuhmomomomo3599 5 років тому

      True

    • @royhsieh4307
      @royhsieh4307 4 роки тому

      why not? everyone loves and misses junk food once in a while

  • @Emmanuel-jf7xf
    @Emmanuel-jf7xf 4 роки тому +22

    Russians build their planes cheaper than the west. Little attention to detail is given to non critical parts, or areas. Very practical approach. No bloating budget. Yet very competitive war planes.

    • @andrewt.5567
      @andrewt.5567 4 роки тому +2

      However, once technology reaches a given point those small attention to details are exactly what matters. The nazis could cut corners with their jet fighters, because no one else had them and it was a huge leap regardless. You can not do that now when that small detail can mean the different between being detected a mile faster than you can detect the other guy. Within that mile he shot you in the face. If you want to spend billions of dollars on a project you had better not be being lazy.

    • @slooob23
      @slooob23 4 роки тому +4

      @@andrewt.5567 The "attention to detail" meant the air force never got the necessary numbers of the f22 and never will. Not much point in having clever tech if planes don't get built or are too expensive to maintain.

    • @erichkorman710
      @erichkorman710 3 роки тому

      You are in the dark. Migs 28s, 29s and 31s are all complete titanium and built to more exacting standards than commercially produced assembly line warplanes. Russian aeronautical engineers try to advance the state while our companies hire foreign engineers and scientists who immigrate for the paycheck. Russian attention to detail has given us the ejection seats we use now and the rockets that took us to space the last 20 years. When Russia sent Migs to Syria we immediatly got our obsolete F15s & 16s out. Israel and the U.S. don't let their warplanes near Iran because they have Russian AA, considered the best in the world. America has underestimated every enemy since WWII. The Vietnamese and Iraqis were still shooting when we were driven out. Trump had secretary Pompeo sign a document of capitulation to the Taliban for them to stop killing us. Understimating Russia is a mistake our military doesnt make for a moment

  • @edwinjones1000
    @edwinjones1000 4 роки тому +2

    About 15 years ago, I was at work during an Air Show when one of those F-Models flew DIRECTLY over my head at about 50 yards. He was so close, I could see his helmet in the cockpit. Then, he flew STRAIGHT UP OVER MY HEAD!!!!!! The engines were rectangular. The noise was heart-pounding. The vibrations shook my entire body. I almost soiled my pants. This video does not do justice to the raw power of those engines. .

  • @victorbrown3032
    @victorbrown3032 4 роки тому +20

    Where’s the “vs” part? The video was 90% Mig. And, as mentioned by others these two planes are 25 or more years apart. Different generations...

    • @davbhard
      @davbhard 4 роки тому

      Only 23 years apart between service entry dates. The mig29 entered service in 1982. The F22 entered service in 2005.

  • @johnlovetttx
    @johnlovetttx 4 роки тому +78

    This Mig blows more smoke than a 1974 Diesel Locamotve train

    • @johnlovetttx
      @johnlovetttx 4 роки тому

      @@ItsMe-jh7fb lmao

    • @longshanks7157
      @longshanks7157 4 роки тому +5

      @@ItsMe-jh7fb most military jet fuel is Avtur. Avtur is kerosene.

    • @theenzoferrari458
      @theenzoferrari458 4 роки тому +2

      And apparently you've been breathing in to much fumes cant you cant spell dumbass fuckwad

    • @yoshka7779
      @yoshka7779 4 роки тому

      the very first examples of the MiG-29 were built in 1975. 50-year technology

    • @marklittle8805
      @marklittle8805 4 роки тому

      Rolling coal!!!

  • @Adamas_83
    @Adamas_83 4 роки тому +164

    Yeah, let's compare a modern aircraft to a cold war relic... Seems good.

    • @sutterlinm
      @sutterlinm 4 роки тому +10

      Thwre was nothing to compare. A raptor took off. Rest of video was the boring mix doing a couple maneuvers

    • @b-trucker7717
      @b-trucker7717 4 роки тому +4

      That's their problem if they still fly old relics,its called upgrade or stick with the same old shit😁

    • @BoomerKeith1
      @BoomerKeith1 4 роки тому +5

      Given it's age, I feel like the Mig pilot used up about 3/4 of his fuel sitting at open throttle before he even started the roll.

    • @addz17
      @addz17 4 роки тому +12

      In terms of putting on a show for people the MIG subjectively looks better, has a far better thrust to weight ratio, is much much faster and equally as maneuverable. You're going to need a MIG 35 if you don't want to be instantly blown out of the sky in the presence of an f-22 if you start talking about warfare.

    • @wilmayoung1329
      @wilmayoung1329 4 роки тому +6

      @@addz17 Lol @ "much, much faster" The MiG 29's top speed is around 1320 knots (1520MPH) while the F 22 Raptor's top speed is around 1303 knots (1500MPH). A 20MPH difference isn't that much when you have faster flying/more advanced armament to make up for the loss in speed.

  • @TvshkaHumma
    @TvshkaHumma 8 років тому +54

    Raptor took the win there, even the wash from the raptors engines was more impressive than the migs, but that mig doing that slow flight was badass.

    • @stefanmarjanovic1781
      @stefanmarjanovic1781 8 років тому +6

      u compare mig that was built in 1983 to a jet from 2005

    • @sherlockhomeless2059
      @sherlockhomeless2059 8 років тому

      Stefan Marjanovic um the f-22 rapctor is older than mig

    • @sherlockhomeless2059
      @sherlockhomeless2059 8 років тому

      It was made around the Cold War

    • @ultimatepotato3604
      @ultimatepotato3604 8 років тому +1

      Your an idiot, or trolling...

    • @josanjosan
      @josanjosan 8 років тому +6

      Mig-29 first flight in 1977, introduced in 1982
      F-22 first flight in 1997, introduced in 2005
      You could at least do some fact checking so that you wont make yourself look like an idiot, Lava dragon Gaming.

  • @Essential9000
    @Essential9000 8 років тому +142

    This is Polish Air force Mig 29 Yeess ;-)

    • @lgcr4451
      @lgcr4451 8 років тому +5

      What you want a medal? maybe a free passage to the u.k...

    • @zepter00
      @zepter00 8 років тому +51

      Nah... he doesn’t like redhair yellow teeth fucks and zero pretty girls in UK. 😏

    • @supafuckinmingster
      @supafuckinmingster 8 років тому +16

      The fuck is your problem? What have Poles or Poland ever done to you?

    • @lgcr4451
      @lgcr4451 8 років тому +1

      supafuckinmingster It's a priest infested anal hole for nato. But of whinging Russophobic bitches.

    • @tlecki1
      @tlecki1 8 років тому +23

      free passage to where??? British caliphate You means? right

  • @briandang236
    @briandang236 4 роки тому +24

    Mig needs to get its charcoal burner cleaned out. Smoke is all black!

    • @thatoneguy4319
      @thatoneguy4319 4 роки тому

      Brian Dang ever hear of a diesel

    • @briandang236
      @briandang236 4 роки тому

      @@thatoneguy4319 no I haven't. Where I came from, we use dark matter or anti matter!

    • @ryszardbargiel7256
      @ryszardbargiel7256 4 роки тому

      @@thatoneguy4319 ever hear of that one guy that made no sense?

    • @rawhidelamp
      @rawhidelamp 4 роки тому

      @@ryszardbargiel7256 ever heard someone whose comment was so useless they needed someone to tell them to shut up

    • @andrewt.5567
      @andrewt.5567 4 роки тому

      You laugh....but the mig could get refueled at any highway pilot station.

  • @b00stedrust
    @b00stedrust 8 років тому +5

    great footage sir, Love and respect for both jets, growing up.. I always had a f15 and a mig29 model hanging in my room, to me they represented the upper edge of air superiority.. (and still do) Cant deny the raptor tho, what an amazing machine, ty for uploading. You got a Sub.

  • @Rob-vv5yn
    @Rob-vv5yn 8 років тому +12

    these planes are generations apart the Mig29'is a very old design now, your just fooling yourself if you think this what you would be fighting in a battle tomorrow.

  • @KittensgiveMorbogas
    @KittensgiveMorbogas 4 роки тому +15

    Flying any of these jets must be the most amazing and awesome experience ever, it’s literally a privilege.

  • @deadchewie
    @deadchewie 7 років тому +9

    Following that Mig must be like flying through a grease fire.

  • @RealisticZeus
    @RealisticZeus 8 років тому +8

    the f22 looks like an alien ship lol love the angels on the body

  • @igorermakov4453
    @igorermakov4453 3 роки тому +10

    Вот делали наши деды и отцы! И почти без компьютеров!

  • @Pincer88
    @Pincer88 8 років тому +18

    Wow! Both awesome climbers. But when you consider the technology gap between the both, it makes the Mig al the more impressive IMHO.

  • @robertcolvin5045
    @robertcolvin5045 8 років тому +10

    The Mig 29 is a decent aircraft but by no means can it even think of going head to head with an F22, it is not even a contest plus they should work on those smokey engines on the Mig you can see it coming from miles away just like the old F 4 Phantoms.

    • @fazecringey3840
      @fazecringey3840 5 років тому

      robert colvin Really agree with you

    • @JAnx01
      @JAnx01 4 роки тому

      No shit Sherlock.

  • @rated-gr3983
    @rated-gr3983 2 роки тому +2

    Mig 29 is so smooth and that vertical fly is awesome....

  • @Mr00Bosek
    @Mr00Bosek 4 роки тому +4

    Its like the old beautiful ferrari and modern, advanced ferrari. Both great but the classic one is... You just want to watch it flying, screaming and smoking. Pure, muscular and powerful machine.

    • @petergoldstein5455
      @petergoldstein5455 4 роки тому

      I like the Tomcat and the "Bodybuilder" F-15. I believe the F-15 has still the vertical acceleration Record. From leaving the ground till 20.000meters (not feet) 1m:03s!! Concorde needed 14 Minutes. Empty and with maximum Power.

  • @dferrari3215
    @dferrari3215 4 роки тому +4

    The F-22 went straight up lol! That was nuts!

  • @buggerlugz6753
    @buggerlugz6753 4 роки тому

    1:58 whats all the fire in the background? where the last pilot to try that failed and crashed?

  • @3751608
    @3751608 8 років тому +8

    хорошие самолеты, и красивые маневры.
    пускай бы этим все и ограничивалось, а не использовались по своему прямому назначению

  • @amangupta7303
    @amangupta7303 5 років тому +19

    Mig 29 is a amazing aircraft, considering its price and low maintenance

    • @terryduncan5718
      @terryduncan5718 5 років тому +2

      Yeah l got mine at CarMax...traded my Cessna 150 even up...

    • @johnthomas9317
      @johnthomas9317 4 роки тому +2

      ....... forgot to mention the 29s pathetic reliability. No one ever mentions the Russian built aircraft sit on the ground broken, more than they fly, their tanks are like that too. You get what you pay for, I guess. Great air show and parade equipment though.

    • @goodputin4324
      @goodputin4324 4 роки тому

      High maintenance you moron

    • @amangupta7303
      @amangupta7303 4 роки тому +1

      @@goodputin4324 i think u should fuck off

    • @goodputin4324
      @goodputin4324 4 роки тому

      @@amangupta7303 chutiya chutiya

  • @Wess-S
    @Wess-S 4 роки тому

    Those f22 and f35 are awesome to see in person. The maneuvers they pull are absolutely mind boggling.

  • @northindian344
    @northindian344 4 роки тому +17

    Mig has been filled with Diesel 😂😇

    • @michaelpegram3683
      @michaelpegram3683 3 роки тому

      well....jet fuel is essentially kerosene which is nothing more than refined diesel.

    • @bazzhm1447
      @bazzhm1447 3 роки тому

      M29 expert every where😲 we should 🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐

  • @venkatasrikanth245
    @venkatasrikanth245 4 роки тому +24

    F22 : u can't see me because of the speed ha ah..
    Mig: u can't see me bcoz of the SMOKE!! Whooo hoo.....

    • @BucktheGuy
      @BucktheGuy 4 роки тому +5

      Mig is faster though:(

    • @YF-23
      @YF-23 4 роки тому

      @@BucktheGuy but doesnt look as cool

    • @eddieregan
      @eddieregan 4 роки тому +2

      Mig made in the 70s. F22 is new.
      They should compare jets made same years.
      There is a reason why nasa still users Russian rockets

    • @rawhidelamp
      @rawhidelamp 4 роки тому

      @@eddieregan NASA uses Roscosmos to get to space because Obama cut funding towards NASA, and instead made his wallet thicker. Hopefully, NASA can develop a rocket to carry Astronauts to space soon.

    • @doxed64
      @doxed64 4 роки тому +2

      Instead of “Whoo hoo”, you shouldve said Choo choo c:

  • @supersonic1246
    @supersonic1246 4 роки тому +2

    two brilliant ,wonderful aeroplanes ,even when not really comparable/from diff times.. :)MIG stands nearly still in cobra on her thrust and then accelerates upwards heading to the skies..Wow :)

  • @BRTigershark
    @BRTigershark 8 років тому +126

    LOL russian jets run on diesel or something?

    • @Диман33рус-п4я
      @Диман33рус-п4я 8 років тому +8

      LoL usa

    • @johnnyg4545
      @johnnyg4545 8 років тому +6

      BRTigershark ha ha it looks like it

    • @v6am32
      @v6am32 8 років тому +6

      Mig-29 has pretty old engines with less efficient combustion chambers old f-15/f16/f18 engines smokes so.
      And afterburner gases so smoking too.

    • @darkseid5553
      @darkseid5553 7 років тому +1

      BRTigershark no it is better than western shit

    • @robingoswami2850
      @robingoswami2850 6 років тому +2

      Lol Russia 👈

  • @CorrieBergeron
    @CorrieBergeron 7 років тому +37

    MiG: Takes off, executes high-G vertical pull-up.
    F-22: Takes off, TURNS VERTICAL CORNER.

    • @uio890138
      @uio890138 4 роки тому +6

      MIG: gets shot down in first 30 seconds of engagement

    • @gomezgomez6299
      @gomezgomez6299 4 роки тому +2

      Cold Beer I always thought how stupid the Cobra ( even though looks great) maneuver is in a combat scenario.......

    • @uio890138
      @uio890138 4 роки тому +2

      @@gomezgomez6299 It's a great air show aerobatic stunt, but in combat speed and energy are the keys to winning. Always have been, always will be.

    • @gomezgomez6299
      @gomezgomez6299 4 роки тому

      @@uio890138 that's what I meant….the cobra doesn't work in real world combat

    • @gabrieldossantoscampos5127
      @gabrieldossantoscampos5127 4 роки тому

      @@gomezgomez6299 You're a Pilot?

  • @youdoyouplayer8529
    @youdoyouplayer8529 4 роки тому

    What was the mig attempting @1:57? He’s in landing config but his sink rate was crazy. Surely the computers were yelling at him before powering up and going around

  • @ujjawalchaudhary1850
    @ujjawalchaudhary1850 5 років тому +8

    MIG 29 specially built for short take off.. many navies use this aircraft on aircraftcarrier .. Indian Navy have approx 60 Mig 29 K .. ... where as raptor is future 👍

    • @weasle2904
      @weasle2904 5 років тому

      Mig 29K are extremely lightened and cannot take off with very much payload, or fuel. They are handicapped. Whereas the US uses catapult launched vehicles, which allows heavier payload and more fuel, AND shorter take off...

    • @steventhacker350
      @steventhacker350 4 роки тому +1

      The rapters first flight was all the way back in 1990.... Thats 30 year old tech... Imagine what we have now...

    • @addicz2
      @addicz2 4 роки тому +1

      @@steventhacker350 F35 is all you have. Too much problems those moneys cant fix

  • @ArtyDc600
    @ArtyDc600 4 роки тому +3

    This comment is because no one is talking about the heatwaves and beautiful mirages 🔥🔥

  • @creamytrumpet7435
    @creamytrumpet7435 4 роки тому

    Wow! Thanks for the warning!! That was a loud video!!! The motorcycle going past a 3.36 was incredibly loud!!!! awesome!!!!!

  • @agentkay2002
    @agentkay2002 4 роки тому +6

    That MiG smokes more than my smoker... which reminds me, I need to check on my brisket!

    • @clydeshingle5104
      @clydeshingle5104 4 роки тому

      Ah dude you have me pissing my pants 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @SsoulBlade
    @SsoulBlade 8 років тому +6

    Impressive.
    Those Mig engines are smoky.

    • @Diemerstein
      @Diemerstein 8 років тому +1

      Yes they are, they are also very reliable.

    • @ostberg71
      @ostberg71 8 років тому +7

      Diesel mig

    • @patriotsfan1236
      @patriotsfan1236 8 років тому +1

      correct. Russian scrap

    • @mikecruz6782
      @mikecruz6782 8 років тому +1

      old technology

    • @MillionFoul
      @MillionFoul 8 років тому +2

      +Diemerstien "they are also very reliable."
      You do realize you're talking about an engine that has a service life in flight hours shorter than the mean time between one of three overhauls an F-110 would go through in its life, produces less thrust, and burns more fuel, right?

  • @atnstn
    @atnstn 2 роки тому +2

    Graceful, beautiful planes. Incredible.

  • @Bra55Monkey
    @Bra55Monkey 8 років тому +96

    US engines are much more efficient at burning fuel. You don't see any unburnt fuel smoke trails.

    • @gokhanhatinoglu
      @gokhanhatinoglu 8 років тому +34

      Yes, you are right but that is Polish Airforce Mig and it's made Soviet times.
      Probably its age is over 35 years. :)

    • @zepter00
      @zepter00 8 років тому +4

      You must be realy stupid if you can't check in google that Poland bought new Migs-29 in 1989 and 1990

    • @gokhanhatinoglu
      @gokhanhatinoglu 8 років тому +9

      I didn't check it but do you really believe those migs were new? btw, if they were new, it's mean they are 27 years old now.
      I don't know the product date of those F-18s.
      Can you inform me if you have resources?
      And, I want to remind you Soviets collapsed at 1991.

    • @zepter00
      @zepter00 8 років тому

      Gökhan YILDIZ Yes, they were new. Yes, they have 27 years now... Yes, Russia still use Tu-95 bombers made in 1959-1960

    • @gokhanhatinoglu
      @gokhanhatinoglu 8 років тому +13

      Tu-95 is very different class my friend.
      USA still uses B-52 too.
      They upgraded it with some new avionics and jammers.
      Russians did the same on Tu-160, Mig29 and Su-27. And, they called them with different name as Mig-35 and Su-35 or Su-37.
      Axctually, we can't say Su-35 is an advanced Su-27. They are almost totaly different structers. Maybe only designs are similar. All others are changed. Even construttion materials. Engines, avionics, radars etc totaly different.
      It is the same for Mig29 and Mig35.

  • @grabir01
    @grabir01 8 років тому +4

    the Mig is a Great Looking Old Plane !! The F22 looks out of this world... Go Martin !!

    • @aleksfishan
      @aleksfishan 8 років тому

      but flying as plane from 70, not so fast, not so dangerous, as lodpapy walking in garden, see don't broke legs, old moron.

  • @GrnChli
    @GrnChli 4 роки тому +1

    I got to see a Raptor Demonstration back in 2012. The most amazing display I ever seen.

    • @xyzaero
      @xyzaero 3 роки тому

      Check the Raptor Demopilot interview at „Aircrew Interview“ !!

  • @jwdickinson643
    @jwdickinson643 4 роки тому +12

    people seem to forget that fighter performance is more than thrust, thrust-vectoring, climb rate, turn agility, etc. that’s all what you see....what is not seen is the avionics and THAT makes the difference. The Raptor can track and launch on up to six targets simultaneously and consecutively but most importantly its sensor array can detect targets farther than the target sensors can detect....so if the targets can be picked off before the targets can even figure out what’s in the air, game over. The whole point to the Raptor’s electronic capability is to eliminate the chance of a dog-fight before it becomes a dog-fight or to minimize the severity of one if it happens....my money is on the Raptor & Raptor pilot....

    • @patewing5808
      @patewing5808 4 роки тому

      www.pogoarchives.org/m/dp/dp-fa22-Riccioni-03082005.pdf read little bit about Queen hangar called F-22

    • @retardidris1070
      @retardidris1070 4 роки тому +3

      The video is about vertical take off not which plane can take out which first, we already know the raptor can kill almost every plane in the air, you don't have to be hanged on it. Enjoy the video two planes vertically taking off and know it's a good thing these 2 countries are not fighting.

  • @OAwesomeO
    @OAwesomeO 6 років тому +4

    Ive seen an f22 in person at the air show in my home town and i cant stress enough how insanely capable the aircraft truly is. I watched f15s, f16s and f18s fly that day and nothing comes close to the f22...

  • @craigpennington1251
    @craigpennington1251 4 роки тому

    Both are super hot aircraft. Cool maneuvers by the MIG.

  • @andreyfisenko8570
    @andreyfisenko8570 8 років тому +8

    Это ещё не самый лучший пилотаж! Приезжайте на МАКС в подмосковном Жуковском, там сможете снять высший пилотаж!

    • @andreyfisenko8570
      @andreyfisenko8570 8 років тому +1

      +TopFelya
      Да, он проводится через год, по нечетным. То есть следующий в 2017 году.

    • @andreyfisenko8570
      @andreyfisenko8570 8 років тому

      +TopFelya
      Если есть возможность, приезжайте! Не пожалеете, гарантирую :-)
      Единственное, что может немного подпортить, это погода. Пару раз попадали под дождь. Это огорчает

    • @yinyangxperience5137
      @yinyangxperience5137 8 років тому

      Andrey Fisenko Our phones translate your Russian. Just Fyi

  • @Be_thechange
    @Be_thechange 5 років тому +5

    Wat the hell.. never seen so much black smoke from a fighter. Jet.. Tactic to blind the enemy ?????🤣🤣🤪

    • @Cars-N-Jets
      @Cars-N-Jets 5 років тому

      praveen kumar No I think it's a Tactic used by the Pilot to get shot down out of the sky.

    • @royhsieh4307
      @royhsieh4307 4 роки тому

      ir signal blocker

  • @slash11lipo
    @slash11lipo 4 роки тому +3

    F22, the most beautiful aircraft ever made!

  • @РусланШамсутдинов-е2я

    Гордость силу духа защищать Родину Россию нам передали наши предки деды которые воевали 1941 1945.За это нас никогда никому не сломать.

  • @OzzyTripping
    @OzzyTripping 4 роки тому +14

    Mig 29 reminds me of a cat for some reason. Great looking bird

    • @chrisstopher2277
      @chrisstopher2277 3 роки тому

      I love the f22 but it reminds me of a flying squirrel

  • @Oatsandflakes
    @Oatsandflakes 2 роки тому +2

    Five minutes of absolute speeds and great power⚡

  • @eacentertainmentchannel4720
    @eacentertainmentchannel4720 5 років тому +4

    U can see the mig 29 didn't pull back on the stick until after he flew for a bit at 45 degrees then went Vertical. The F22 went from horizontal and straight vertical. U gotta have a powerful engine to do what the f22 did.. just thought I point that out✌😏

    • @Cars-N-Jets
      @Cars-N-Jets 5 років тому

      EAC Entertainment Channel Well you didn't point it out it's just a Fact

    • @addicz2
      @addicz2 4 роки тому

      Mig doesnt have thrust vectoring engine

  • @dakota481
    @dakota481 4 роки тому +5

    When Starscream takes off into space at the end of Tranformers...
    1:27

  • @mpmassacre91
    @mpmassacre91 Рік тому +1

    I love the mig29 it's a beauty. The f22 is also very stunning.

  • @Sovereign_Citizen_LEO
    @Sovereign_Citizen_LEO 8 років тому +23

    There is really no comparison, but I will say that even though they are not environmentally friendly, the Mig engines seem a bit more powerful. When the Raptor does that vertical climb it seems to have a lower thrust to weight ratio. And the Mig has more fully articulating thrust vectoring exhaust nozzles. I think Sukhois have the best thrust vectoring though.

    • @Sopris02
      @Sopris02 8 років тому

      They have basically the exact same Thrust/weight ratio.

    • @markinson9398
      @markinson9398 8 років тому +2

      Why do the mig engines seem more puwerful? More smoke? F22 entered vertical climb faster than the Mig, despite being heavier (at least i think it is heavier by like 4 tons.

    • @wslx0195
      @wslx0195 8 років тому +12

      Smoke does not equate power; it's a sign of inefficient fuel burn. You can see that the F22 produces a lot more heat, however. Look at the size of the heat wave. You can hardly see the F22 while it's taking off.

    • @tinglydingle
      @tinglydingle 8 років тому +1

      "seems"
      you sure have me convinced buddy!

    • @deltasierracharlie
      @deltasierracharlie 8 років тому +5

      LOL!!
      The F-22 is today the fighter with the most thrust/power in operation in the world!
      The exact max thrust in full afterburner, of the F-119 (F-22 engine) is classified, but it's at least something like 35,000 lbf...
      The F-22 has 2 engines... that's 70,000 lbf of thrust in full afterburner!
      The RD-33 engine (Mig-29 engine) produces 18,300 lbf of thrust in full afterburner...
      The Mig-29, as everybody knows, has 2 engines... so that's 36,600 lbf of thrust in full afterburner for the Mig-29...
      A single F119-PW-100 (F-22 engine) produces basically as much thrust as two RD-33's!

  • @esotericyetti327
    @esotericyetti327 4 роки тому +25

    I've always admired the mig 29.

    • @airwolf5826
      @airwolf5826 3 роки тому

      Funnily enough the two seater Mig 29 Swallow looks better than the single seater. Which is unlike most fighter aircraft.

  • @jlawsl
    @jlawsl 2 роки тому +1

    Why do mig29s spray out all of that black smoke? Are they not burning all of the fuel or is it just lower quality fuel?

  • @phx4closureman
    @phx4closureman 4 роки тому +10

    1:07 *eyes of the Devil lookin' back at ya!!!*

  • @CujoSuki
    @CujoSuki 8 років тому +5

    F22 is far newer than the Mig so I think it did quite well

  • @albertbryan7132
    @albertbryan7132 4 роки тому

    I saw an F22Raptor flying with the P51D Mustang at the airshow. What a pair of greats.

  • @theimperfectgod7140
    @theimperfectgod7140 4 роки тому +4

    Love these beautiful machines!

  • @phill5917
    @phill5917 8 років тому +46

    F-22's can climb out ALOT faster than in this video and its not even funny.

    • @Cars-N-Jets
      @Cars-N-Jets 5 років тому +1

      Phillip Strong I'm going to Oshkosh this summer of 2019 can't wait to see that

    • @SealofPerfection
      @SealofPerfection 4 роки тому

      @@Cars-N-Jets Hope you made it. Saw a 22 at Seymour Johnson a couple years ago, most impressive thing I've ever seen at an airshow. The moves they can make, after you've been there awhile watching other jets, seem almost unnatural. And you know they're holding back, too.

    • @tracemitchell2093
      @tracemitchell2093 4 роки тому +1

      Living right next to Elmendorf I see the vertical climb outs all the time from the 22s. From spool up to 30,000 feet is only about 25-30 seconds. And that’s from near sea level, I think the runway only sits at about 180 feet msl. Then they haul ass toward whatever dumbass Russian bear is pushing on to the ADIZ

    • @phill5917
      @phill5917 4 роки тому

      @@tracemitchell2093 I use to live out in anchorage in MT view and that's where I would see them take off's from.

  • @samikghosh4595
    @samikghosh4595 4 роки тому

    Can anyone say me why 1:19 the air got blurred?

    • @topfelya
      @topfelya  4 роки тому

      yes

    • @topfelya
      @topfelya  4 роки тому

      Hot exhaust from aircraft engines

  • @efini_fc4276
    @efini_fc4276 4 роки тому +3

    This must've been filmed in Japan. Can't even show the exhaust hole of a jet without censorship blurring.

  • @Cogzed
    @Cogzed 4 роки тому +3

    I know bush planes that’ll takeoff faster than either of these and can fly slower. 🤣 Both of these are sweet birds!