The M500 ribbon is most excellent. With a slightly advanced mixing console, or some outboard gear, a little bit of de-essing would make for a great top end without piercing. The E945 is probably made for ‘eat-the-mic’ singers. Meh.. The Behringer. Well.. For a karaoke bar? It’s not bad, and with recessed upper frequencies, it might be not feedback too easily in such enviroment. I hope you get to test out the Earthworks Ethos. (!)
Strictly speaking, I mean how quickly the diaphragm can start, stop and accurately follow changes. If it can't do this, a kind of smearing results (though this can be okay). I have found that the airy breath regions of voices reveal this in the most practical way. It's sometimes not easy to notice, but it comes across as fine detail in the breath, I find.
Thanks for doing these for us musicians!
My pleasure.
Thank you for announcing which Mike you’re speaking through. I am a blind guy and it helps quite a bit… Thanks for all the videos…
Good point, thanks for reminding me.
Another great video Anton. I don't think the Behringer would be of use to anyone with a nasally voice. It would just be too muffled.
The M500 ribbon is most excellent. With a slightly advanced mixing console, or some outboard gear, a little bit of de-essing would make for a great top end without piercing.
The E945 is probably made for ‘eat-the-mic’ singers. Meh..
The Behringer. Well.. For a karaoke bar? It’s not bad, and with recessed upper frequencies, it might be not feedback too easily in such enviroment.
I hope you get to test out the Earthworks Ethos. (!)
Hello! What do you mean by 'speed'?
Strictly speaking, I mean how quickly the diaphragm can start, stop and accurately follow changes. If it can't do this, a kind of smearing results (though this can be okay). I have found that the airy breath regions of voices reveal this in the most practical way. It's sometimes not easy to notice, but it comes across as fine detail in the breath, I find.