Sony FDR-AX700 and FDR-AX100 HandyCam Physical Differences Worth Switching? DISCONTINUED!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 лют 2018
- If you can find an AX 100 or AX 700 Sony Camcorder, buy them asap! They are top performers and are being discontinued by Sony. You can find deep discounts on them while they last. I am very disappointed to see this lineup fade away. You can currently (November 2023) find them at more than $1,000.00 lower than the retail price. Good luck!
I have been using several AX100 units for years, I've recently added the AX700 to my prosumer arsenal and I am very pleased with it. Here are some of the physical and feature differences. I hope you enjoy it and thanks for watching.
Sony AX700: amzn.to/2CGPhlp
Sony AX100: amzn.to/2GHFKgp
This Microphone works on both: amzn.to/2oosNRT
Blazing FAST SD Card: amzn.to/2FukxqS
The links above are Amazon affiliate links.
I'm very often asked what cameras I use when making honeybee videos and these two are my most frequent grab-and-go cameras. I have been using the AX100 for many years and have never experienced a fail with it. BUT, the new AX700 lets me video in lower light with cleaner sequences and offers much higher frame rates for those amazing slow-motion video moments.
Both of these cameras have night modes... both have ok built-in sound recording, but I have always used the Sony top-mounted microphones which provide superior audio pickup with no camera noise. The built-in mic picks up zoom noises etc... and will record your breathing behind the camera, the Sony top-mounted mic ECM-XYST1M eliminates those problems.
So, for those of you who asked and are interested in the gear I use, these are my primary video cameras. What did I use to film this comparison? Another Sony AX-100...
In the near future, I will be demonstrating the slow-motion capabilities of the AX700 as our honey bees begin their spring foraging adventures! Get ready to bee impressed :)
I paid full price for both of these cameras, these were not given to me, nor did I receive a discount when purchasing them. I am required by Amazon to post the following statement when affiliate links are used:
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking Amazon.com and affiliated sites - Домашні улюбленці та дикі тварини
There are several reasons to upgrade not mentioned here. The autofocus is much improved. HDR, and S&Q motion. I love my AX100, but when I can afford it the AX100 becomes a Bcam and the AX700 becomes the main workhorse. Great cameras, both of them.
Very informative thanks. I just ordered the AX700 upgrading from the AX53. The camera looks amazing along with the video quality. The manual settings are a great feature as you would always struggle with accurate settings on the 53 model. Can't wait to get started!
You're going to love it Jon, I've replaced all of my AX100 units with the 700 and continue to be impressed by the performance of the AX700. All the best!
Hi Frederick, I got the camera, its amazing. We went out last week to Bletchley Park where code breaking took place in WW2. I made short film of the day. Still learning the intricacies of the camera but overall really pleased with this first attempt. ua-cam.com/video/NSshKiX8-sA/v-deo.html
If you get an opportunity to see it and maybe give me a few pointers that would be great. Thanks again for your informative video on this camera.
Hi Frederick, very nice comparison video well done and thank you
Thank you Hussein, I'm so glad you enjoyed it!
Thanks!
Very nice comparison video. I've used the Sony CX900 since 2014 and am ready to upgrade to 4K. After much comparison, I've decided on the AX700. It has all the same features as both the NX-80 and the Z-90 with the exception of the XLR handle... and the SDI out on the Z90, neither of which I ever need. I'll go with a Mazantz mic preamp adapter ($100) if I ever need XLR mics.
very nice video, i was looking for information about this two cameras to make a decision about which one to buy and this helped me a lot, thank you !
I'd like to trade in all of my AX100 units for more AX700s as I grab the 700 twice as often, it's really a top performer and it tracks/focuses better. The dual card slot is also a plus and I've come to really like that. Glad this helped you.
@@FrederickDunn do you have a video of you using it with the ronin?
@@danny89mc no, I haven't gotten around to doing anything like that yet.
Just wanted to express my gratitude for this video. Really helped my decision process. Other UA-cam videos did not achieve that feat for me. Thank you.
Wow Richard, I really appreciate that! Thank you for taking the time to let me know :) I still love the AX700... my current go-to grab and go video camera.
Nice comparison video. Thanks
You're welcome :)
just bought the 700 to add to my 100 based off your review, ty
You're going to like that camera!
excellent. Just exactly what I needed. Thank You.
Glad it helped!
@@FrederickDunn How interesting that you recorded this video in 2018, four years ago, and it is still relevant. videocamera release cycle is a lot slower than DSLR or mirrorless camera cycles. The AX100 from 2014 is still a brilliant 4K camera and it will remain relevant even in 2024, 10 years after its announcement.
As someone who uses the cx900, I say this serial legend. Thanks
Those are some nice cameras. And nice video.
Thank you.
Liked your review much. but the bandig on the lcd screen(4:50) does not appear on my my AX 100E not even through a magnifying glass. Thanks for sharing.
Honestly if the core, shudder speed and zoom level are the same then it boils down to what you want out of the features like LOS remote which is terrible I would also prefer the RF remote for sure. But if it’s a cost that isn’t going to put a dent in your wallet, why not enjoy better features of the new model! You can always sell the 100 to offset the cost of the new camera which is always a bonus. Great review as always and enjoy the new gear! Looking forward to all the future content you will film with it.
Hi Alter Egos... yep, you're right, and the sensor is a new FX model, but I don't expect an extraordinary visual difference... using it tomorrow for some musician promotions and will see. We're using three cameras on that, so will see them all side by side in post-production. I do like it though! Thanks as always for watching and commenting!
Hi Fred, thanks for the vid. I also am an AX100 guy, but I get so frustrated with the poor auto focus. I am testing the AX700 and find that the auto focus is way better and the auto meter/focus is also better in low light. The spotmeter/focus is hard to set but I guess I'll get used to it. I really miss the touch screen though. It's weird, my AX700 AVCHD files won't play audio on my Windows 7 machines but will on my windows 10 machines. I wish the AX700 was lighter in weight- I shoot hand held for hours at a time in multi light situations. I like the adjustable audio level setting when using the Sony hotshoe mic on the 700, the 100 was auto set. Also, the zoom is way better and easier to control on the 700.
Yes! I also miss that touch screen... only use that when formatting a new card. I also agree that the 700 is quicker to focus and doesn't lose the subject as the AX100 units sometimes do as they drift to focus on the background at odd times. I have several of them and when I'm editing multi-camera sequences, the AX700 stands out with better image quality in challenging artificial/natural lighting situations. The 100 units are great when the scene is well illuminated. I'll just eventually retire the AX100 units as time passes, the price is holding on the AX700, not much of a drop, though when I first obtained the AX-100 units, they were $2k for 4K... now around $1,600.00 I think and the 700 units around $1,800.00 so for that difference, the 700 is a winner. I do all of my post production in Premiere Pro CC, all my systems are running Windows 10pro. Is there a microsoft codec package that would upgrade the Windows 7 system? Or, through the video card you use? Thanks for watching!
I got a Sony FDR-AX53 and it's nice and small, but the sensor is pretty small. I think i might get the Sony FDR-AX700 but the price is high
It's actually priced lower than what I paid for my AX100 units years ago. I'm really enjoying it.
Whats Manual Focus like on it and can get a handle for the top of it.
At this writing the AX-100 is about $1,300.00 and the AX-700 about $2,300
I was thinking the same since i am using now the FDR-AX53 . Tell me please when you buy the AX-700 what your impressions are.
Which one would you recommend for filming wrc rally cars? Is Sony PXW-X70 4K better than AX700? Thank you!
These have both been discontinued. But the AX700 would have been my choice.
Thank you! But Panasonic HC-X1500E or AX700? @@FrederickDunn
They look like very nice cameras. I've always been pleased with the quality Sony makes in just about everything.
When it comes to dslr cameras, I'm a Nikonian, but when it comes to movies, I'm definitely a Sony enthusiast... just earned my Diploma in Movie making last month :)
Ah for photography I'm a Canon person all the way. I've had such bad luck with Nikons. They don't like me and I don't like them. Although I do want to try the P900 at one point. I totally agree about Sony for video. My first video camera was an old 8mm film Sony from the 80s and I loved it. Oh wow congratulations on the diploma. That's awesome.
In the end, no matter what you have in hand, it's what you do with it that counts :) It's that Canon owner hatred of Nikon owners that keeps me from doing photography related videos... they are often irrational. I was photographing a wedding a couple of years ago when a woman walked up all happy saying "what cameras are you using?" When I told her, she paused as if she'd eaten something sour and said "wow, I thoght they hired a professional, I guess not!" and she walked away... at another reception, another woman looked at my gear and said "I guess I'll talk to you, even though you're using Nikon"... (';')( ';').. so so strange. I don't care what anyone is carrying... it's a very strange dynamic. My Nikon use goes all the way back to undersea imaging and what my friends at Nasa are using... the lens investment keeps me in that corner, but I'm fine with anything as long as it's professional grade :)
It's really dumb that people react that way. Nikon's are not for me. I have tried them and they are just frustrating. But I bought my husband a point and shoot Nikon once for a holiday since he had no camera at the time. He had no issues with it and took very nice photos. Funny enough when I forgot mine one time I had to use his and the darn thing wouldn't take a pic when I hit the shutter. WTF? It was so weird and he said he coudln't explain it. He just pushes the button. I respect people with nice nikons though and that they know how to take pics of high quality with them. I was at a botanical garden once and saw a guy with the biggest camera I had ever seen. I asked if I could see it and take a pic of it. He said yes. It was a Nikon and I uploaded that pic and named it "Outer Space Camera." Despite my bad luck I'm willing to try the P900 because I have major respect for a camera that can take pics 85x zoom and get pics of the moon. My canon does 65x and I was very disappointed with my filming of the International Space Station though I'm proud to have gotten a blurry video of it. I wonder if the extra reach would work better for me with the Nikon provided it lets me push the shutter haha. I own an awesome pair of Nikon binoculars. I don't see Canon making those and they are small for traveling and have great image quality.
You find that anywhere where there are two companies competing in the same niche. I've seen it both ways with Nikon to Canon too. But another example is the whole Jeep vs Toyota thing I have encountered since becoming a Jeep owner. Well my husband drives a Toyota Tacoma and I don't get it when I see drawings on windows of one car peeing on another haha. I love mentioning that our cars which we named Bruce and Alan are friends. We also own both PS4 and Xbox and find that owning both things you find some are better at some things while the other is better at something else and it works out.
Great comparison. One thing I would like to know or verify (may have been answered previously) : Does the the 700 kill the 4K HDMI output to a monitor during record like the 100 ? does or can you use external record/monitor clean HDMI 4K Thank You !
This is an EXCELLENT question! I ended with with a Atomos Shogun as my monitor/recorder, as a result of that horrible kill by Sony on the 100. I understand when the camera was in trial testing, the feature was still accessible. But there were camera overheating issues they could not address via firmware. So the feature to export clean 4K via HDMI was killed off...
This was such a handicap to an otherwise very nice camera!
Thanks. Extra video
Is the ax100 compatible the the ronin? And if so which one! I’ve been really wanting to get one but every time I look at the compatibility list I never see the ax100 on there. I’d really appreciate any advice you can give me! Great video btw, very informative.
I've used it with the Ronin S
Nice video, would you recommend the AX700 as a good upgrade to a Canon HFG-30 for high school football and basketball? I love the Canon, but thinking about jumping to 4k.
I don't have experience with the Canon HFG, but the AX700 is a fast focusing action following dynamo and would definitely keep you locked into the action for HS Football. Put it on a mono-pod and you're golden in my opinion.
Question: Does the AX700 work with the Dji ronin gimbal as well? Or only the ax100? I contacted DJI and they said the AX700 wasn’t on the compatibility list for the ronin s2, but I noticed the AX100 is. Seems to me they would both be able to be used on that device. Any help would be great! Trying to find a gimbal for my ax700. Great video btw!
Hi Jayson, I currently use the DJI Ronin-S and the Ax-100 and Ax-700 both work very well with it. No issues at all :)
What is your recommendation between both?
I am looking for camcorder. Both same Zooming?
I would choose the AX700 as the zooming is very close with both, stabilization is better with the 700. If you're using a tripod it won't matter. If you are videoing people, the 700 tracks faces better.
@@FrederickDunn Hello Thanks you very much for your answer.
I have Zhiyun stabilizer i hope can work with my Stabilizer.
@@FrederickDunn i saw some footage of Fdr ax100 its very nice Color and sharp.
The AX 100 units are great, many of my videos are made with them, this video presentation is shot with the AX 100 as I have several of them. Both work well and the price has dropped on the AX100 units... it's just a matter of what you want and have the budget for.
Which one would you recommend for filming lacrosse and/or soccer games? Was using another brand of video camera and sent it back because I wasn't satisfied with the picture and the auto focus was very slow and had a hard time staying in focus.
The AX-700 has controls for focusing speed and it locks in fast. It's far quicker and locks on the subject better than the AX-100 units.
Great comparison...very helpful. BTW, what third party battery and charger would you recommend for the Sony AX-700. Sony needs to include a better charging option with a $,1900 camera!
Thanks Brian, I have the Sony charger and sorry to say I don't use any third party batteries.. I know the Sony batteries are expensive, I did switch it out for the Sony NP-FV100A... There are lots of other battery options that people on Amazon review.. and I know they are a lot less expensive, I just don't use them.
DSTE is one of the better batteries, make sure you get real DSTE. Or get a 5 volt USB step up adapter and run it off a USB power bank all day with the regular battery as a backup PS.
Sorry to rush but can anyone help on my question? the sales are on so I'm hoping to get my new Camcorder in the sales which are on now but I dont know which one is best or my gigging needs. Can anyone help please even if its a good guess :)
ax700 has S-log picture profiles which are really tempting for me for color grading. I don't know how well does ax100's "soft high key"? is that also really flat?
I do like to shoot "flat" and then enhance in post-production. I recently did a music video with the AX700 as mobile and the AX100 units stationary.. in post-production the AX100 was much the same and WB resulted in identical results. This comparison video was also shot with an AX100. I haven't experimented with any of the in-camera profiles, so I'm sorry to say I can't address them.
You shoot flat also in ax100? That would be really interesting to compare AX100's flat to AX700's S-log. I mean almost everything you want to do on professional level you need to shoot flat to get the true benefit of colors.
I learned to do that in cinema school and just made it my habit. even with the GoPro Hero6 units. same...
I've had the AX100 and just got the AX700. With the 100 I could set manual recording settings in 4k, but with the AX700 if I'm doing 4k I can only do the auto movie modes??? None of those fit a tble top review setting. And zooming in with the remote is REALLY slow and I can't find a setting for it. I hate the button for the menu's vs the touch screen on the ax100
I am also not a fan of the way their menu system is layed out. Very cumbersome.
what Carrying bag are you recommend me for the camera AX700? for example the Carrying bag Sony LCS-U30 is good for that camera?
I use the lowpro backpacks and roller bags, depending on what the gig is :)
Hey Dunn, two years later, is there another camcorder or camera you would recommend to make videos? I would like to record myself playing the piano most of the time and then some outdoor stuff once in a while. Thank you.
These are still my go-to cameras. Nothing new on the scene that fits this category. I was recently covering an event as the photographer and there was a video crew there, they all had the AX-100 units. So these are considered Pro-Sumer grade cameras. I think you'll like whichever one you select.
@@FrederickDunn Thanks for the reply. Last question! Which would you choose for videos: Sony A7III, RX100 VII, or the AX700?
Whats Manual Focus like on it and can you get a Handle for the top of its the focusing really fast.
manual focus is easy and you can indeed get the handle attachment with a mic receiver on it. They sell it that way with a different model number. You can put a follow-focus ring on it, but it will have to be a small one, or you'll have to put a spacer under this camera before adding it to your rig.
Sony uses AVCHD as the video recording format. Is this format compatible with Imovie? I'm debating between Sony AX-FDR 700 and Canon Vixia G60 that records in MP4. Thank you.
Natively, iMovie handles
DV
HDV
AVCHD
Apple Intermediate Codec
Apple Animation Codec
Motion JPEG/A
iFrame
h.264
Hey great little video on the differences between these cameras. My question is: Would you upgrade and trade in your AX100 for a Z90??
I don't have any experience, nor opinion regarding the Z90, but I thoroughly enjoy the AX-700 and will be adding more of those. I will eventually retire the AX-100 units. Sorry I can't be of more help.
Does the AX-700 allow clean 4K out via HDMI for external monitor? Or is it limited to 1080P like the AX100?
This major problem ended up forcing me to buy a Atomos Shogun as my monitor/recorder, as a result of that horrible kill by Sony on the 100. I understand when the camera was in trial testing, the feature was still accessible. But there were camera overheating issues they could not address via firmware. So the feature to export clean 4K via HDMI was killed off...
That is a major hurdle for those of us using these to make films. That little monitor doesn’t cut it on some things.
This was such a handicap to an otherwise very nice camera!
Also, other then those things you showed in the video being different, is the only other major change HDR is added? If so, with me owning the Shogun to use with the 100, there is little, if any need for me to upgrade at this point. As the Shogun has multiple HDR modes.
Sends clean 4K video to external monitors and even off-board recorders, with the HDMI output. The full-size (Type-A) HDMI terminal reduces strain on the cable and minimizes damage or accidental disconnection. It will feed your 4k monitors.
i want to make nature video will sony fdr-ax700 camera be right for me
That completely depends on what nature content you're after. IT topic is far too broad for a reasonable answer. This is a good consumer grade video camera. If your subject is small or you'll be close up, I think you'll be happy with it.
Nice video. I've the AX 700 and I'm very happy with it.Does it have a grid option for the viewfinder? I noitced the AX100 has a grid display in your video but I can't locate one on the AX 700?
Hmmmm not sure as I don't use the grid display... I personally wouldn't use that anyway.
@@FrederickDunn Is there any camera strap you'd recommend for the Sony X 700?
@@Keenonhang Absolutely, I use the cotton carrier harness for several cameras at one time, or the shoulder strap from them for smaller cameras held off to the side. They also make a video stabilizer that slides into the front "chest" receiver... you can climb, hike, move freely without the cameras bumping into anything. Just search for the Cotton Carrier and you'll see what I'm talking about.
Frederick Dunn Thanks for that 👍
@@Keenonhang You're welcome!
@Frederick Dunn. We wish to purchase the AX700 for use in church for two things: 1. Record the Sunday message for archival purposes, and 2. Be able to provide a live video feed to a room at the ground floor (the church is on the 2nd floor) for the elderly and people with disabilities (PWD, on wheelchairs, walkers, etc.) to be able to watch the Service on a flat screen. My question is, does the AX700 provide simultaneous live camera feed to the viewfinder/LCD and the HDMI Output port? 2nd question, does the HDMI output display a "clean" video without the status messages (ie. Battery level, recording time, audio meters, etc.)? Thank you.
Yes, you can use it for a live-feed, I connect it to high resolution monitors on occasion, so that works fine. You can turn the display on or off, if you have information displayed on the camera screen, then it also displays on the monitor but you can turn that information OFF. I hope that helps.
@@FrederickDunn Awesome! Thank you.
@@orlypalomar You're welcome :)
hi, please which one is the best to film objects ? which one you used to film this video ? thanks.
the AX-100B was used to film this video. They are equal when filming static objects in studio.
My ax 700 camcorder, when recording a long clip without interruption, but when I upload the video to my computer, it is divided into different videos with the same length. Please just help with the adjustments so that it doesn't break to such a small file. thanks
That has to do with the codec you've selected. You'll fine that information in the owners manual. AVCHD creates those breaks, I recommend that you choose another recording format.
@@FrederickDunn Thanks very much. I will try
With the addition of that joystick the brilliant intuitive touch operability of the AX100 was sacrificed and killed, and the body of AX700 was made a lot bulkier. I've recently watched Alistair Chapmans instructional videos on AX100, and was mind blowing how brilliant touch operability was implemented in 2014 by Sony engineers on tha AX100. This has gone now, and we have to fight with this joystick crazyness. That is a massive difference. The big competitor Canon GX10, G60 managed to combine excellent touch operability with joystick.
I'm a solid fan of the AX700. I still use both units.
I just got the Sony FDR-AX700 and it works fine when recording with the internal mic, however when you attach an external mic (I tried with a Rode and a Sony ECM-CG60) there is a pretty noticable hum/buzz in the background. At first I was using this with an AC adapter, then I changed to a battery and it fixed it, however when I tested it again (with the battery), the hum is still there. Anyone know how I can fix this?
I would double check all of the mic connections... a tiny touch of dialectric grease can also remove any loose connection static.
Does it deliver HDMI output video when recording in 4K? (Is the worst thing for me in AX100)
yes, the AX 700 has that and you control the output resolution.
Hi, I have the FDR-AX700. Could you advice a great way for downloading video footage to an iPhone/IPad etc without using the silly PlayMemories app? Any help would be great. Thank you.
Yes, just pull the card and copy the files directly to your device without a program. Then, when you're ready to begin editing, just import the file into your editing program, or view in Windows Media Player or something similar. I did not install the "play memories" at all.
Frederick Dunn Great thanks, which editing program do you find the nicest to use? I found iMovie quite easy, and thanks for taking the time to reply, appreciated.
I use Premiere Pro CC
Frederick Dunn Hi, I’ve been searching for an SD to lightning cable or similar but it doesn’t appear that you can transfer the XAVC S 4K , XAVC S HD or even the AVCHD video files, only photos. Could you advise me what you’d use to do this, thanks so much 😊
I personally pull the card, place it in the Sandisk multi-card reader and use the usb-connection to the computer via a USB-3 port. From that connection, you can drag and drop all files to a folder on your computer and later import them into your editing software as needed. amzn.to/2jvAH92
What camera would you recommend for shooting a wedding ceremony? AX700 OR AX100 ? Thank you.
The X700 would definitley be my choice. Weddings can go long and you can hot-swap cards in the AX700.
@@FrederickDunn thank you :)
What about switch on sound on ax700? Is it normal? And does it still work good? Thinking about this every time then my camera turn on ))
The audio is identical... BUT, the AX-700 can handle the Sony ECM-B1M Camera-Mount Digital Shotgun Microphone, but the AX-100 can not. The AX-100 works great with the Sony ECM-XYST1M Stereo Microphone which is compatible with both cameras.
@@FrederickDunn Thank you for answer!
Are these better thn dslr or bmpcc4k? Looking for a video camera, hav been shooting too much iPhone video. :)
It depends on what you're going to use them for. I use a dslr because I often want to select lenses that are better suited to what I'm covering. BUT, these focus faster and have greater video options than my Nikon bodies do. I can also mount a variety of microphones on top of my dslr and plug that right in, these cameras have proprietary hot mounts for audio gear, so not as versatile there. For grab and go video production, I prefer these, but for a lot of work I do, a dslr has some advantages. They will definitely outperform your iPhone though :)
Frederick Dunn thank you for your reply, I mainly shoot events and kids volleyball indoor.
@@arsh0603 for that I would definitely go with a dedicated video camera, you can also control the focus acquisition speed, so for sports it will find faces and lock down focus as fast as you want it. I'd use the AX700 for that! AND, you can shoot at a higher frame rate in case you want to show some slow-motion sequences in post-production.
Great comparison video.
I can get a sony ax100 for $1,200 and the ax700 is $1,700. My main use is for videoing church services on Sundays for youtube. Secondary I'm videoing my daughter's High School Marching Band for the next 3 years. My question is should I go with the ax100 or is it worth the $500 difference to get the ax700 or would the ax100 be fine for what I'm doing? thank you.
i think the 100 units would serve you just fine based on what you're planning to do. Unless you find yourself running out of space on your card, then the AX700 allows card swapping with no hickups or data lost.
@@FrederickDunn thank you, I will be making my purchase in the next few days and I think the 100 will be fine also. Always good to get an opinion from someone who has used both.
@@Jimmy-hs7zi You're very welcome. I use them almost every day and can say they hold up extremely well, even in sub zero weather.
Frederick Dunn, after your information, I got the ax700. I just got it today played around with a little. I did some low-light testing inside and I'm pretty happy with it so far. It is much much better quality than what I did have. I just wanted to let you know and I appreciate your help.
Hi could you help me please. I’m a frontman and guitarist for a rock band called KAIN’S TORMENT and I need to record my gigs in low light cramped pubs and the odd festival gig. I want to record 2 hours or less in 4K for the best possible picture and great sound, the finished edited video will end up on UA-cam via Final Cut Pro X on Mac... With the help of Sony I’ve narrowed it down to these 2 camcorders but I’ve hit a brick wall with Sony now. I know hardly anything about cameras etc but can any of you tell me straight which one of these camcorders is ideal for the best job for gigs? Also which external mic is best for gigs? And lastly I heard if it’s 4K recording then I need a certain type of SD Card?
Although I’ll be using the camcorder for gigs mostly, from time to time I might gaffa tape the tripod on to my wheelchair so I can film my trips etc. So the camcorder needs to be shock proof ish as my chair can shake a bit.... Or is there anything better for gigs? Although I’m a camcorder novice I know just what I want etc. Thanks for any help. Kain
Not a great low light camera. It's a great camera, and better in low light than the ax100, but not like the m43 or bigger sensors.
@@VoicesofMusic Thanks bud, the M43 its a camera not a camcorder right? I've already made the mistake of buying a camera and i didn't know this at the time but all camera can only record 20-30 minutes of film and thats how they get around the selling laws. Can you recommend any camcorders? I'm seriously thinking the iPhone 11 Pro Max.
Sorry I missed this question until now. What did you decide to use, and how did it perform for you? :)
@@FrederickDunn just the next iPhone
@@KainsTorment Likely just as good, depending upon what you need it for. Thanks for the update. :)
Soft spoken...i could barely hear you in my headphones...but you gave good info..thanks! Why didnt they add the lens stabalization to this camera?
They do have stabilization... Normal, or Active, it's pretty darn good. When shooting in super slowmotion, turn image stabilization OFF, or you'll get some very strange image shift action.
Frederick Dunn ook...so its in body...just not lile the AX 53 or 33...right??
Yep my ear was sort of in my laptop. A good mic would this or raising volume in post prod.
Sounds perfect to me guys, I think you're listening on crap devices. I wouldn't change a thing Mr Dunn! Crystal clear at my end thank you for your excellent reviews!!!
Is the biggest advantage of the AX700 not the very fast autofocus? What to say about that?
For me personally, that's not the biggest advantage. My favorite function/feature is the super-slow-motion though it does have great face detection and focus following.
Nice! I move nervously with the camera and edit a lot but with the ax100 that is not evident so l have a lot of footage that l throw away. With the ax700 that will be lesser!
Thanks!
Thank you! Looks like there is no difference in the final production.
Much the same, but the AX700 wins the slow-motion battle by far, so if you're into those dramatic slowmotion sequences, the 700 is my current favorite.
can you do slow motion in 4K Mode.
The super slowmotion mode is limited to 1080p
I m going to use 32 B sim card what is the vest sim card for sony ax700? 60 megabits or 30?
I'd go 64 gigs or higher, the 32 can end up cutting the sequence into segments that you have to rejoin later.
@@FrederickDunn what about the megabits? 30 or60 or 90?
What camera was used for this video shoot?
Another AX-100
Could you post some footage that you shot with the 700 and the Ronan?
ua-cam.com/video/ukuz0U5PjbU/v-deo.html here is a short, the mobile sequences are with the Ronin-M - and the AX-700
Frederick Dunn I went and watched your short film and I thought it was really really cool! I thought the footage that you filmed looked really really good! The AX 700 with the Ronin looks to be a very good combination and I think I’ll probably get that for a B camera set up! I am a professional audio engineer by trade for the last 35 years and my business is expanding into doing more video work as well as high and recording and concert touring sound. So I am brand new at digging into the video production stuff. And there is as much to learn with that as there is with Audio! Thank you for your videos!
Frederick Dunn Also wondering if you had the opportunity to run your AEC 700 with an external screen on the Ronan? That’s sort of the direction I think I’m heading would love to get your input.
@@nicefish10 Yes, it's much better for that than the AX-100 units... the hdmi connection is in a much better position. Works excellent.
@@nicefish10 One thing I didn't get and should have, for the AX-700 is a remote trigger to start and stop recording. Having to touch the unit makes me crazy!
Wow--the joystick is right near the record button, I would worry about accidentally turning off record.
I haven't have the problem yet, there is a prominent texture on the joystick and the record button is smooth. I guess that "could" happen though.
Does the Ax700 have NIGHT SHOT???? and I wanted to ask if you wanted to sell your Ax100.
Yes, the AX700 has night shot, you find it in the video menu with or without light. Sorry, I don't have any gear for sale at the moment.
@@FrederickDunn can you do a video test of the quality of both camera.. with and without night shot. I just want to see compared side by side.
the quality of both camera with and without night mode. just maybe walk around with it.
Panasonic AG-UX90 or AX700? Which one would you suggest?
the 700... but it's a personal choice depending on the features you'll need and use.
Hey is there a led light, or any light on these camcorders?
Night shot illumination only, no white light.
My question is to decide between the AX-700 and the RX-10IV; I take 50/50% photo/video. The RX is more oriented to stills, with better resolution and functions, but the video functionality and quality are the same, except for the ND filter. The RX includes a 24-600 mm zoom, but low capacity battery. Both have similar weight and size, and the prices are very close now.
I am completely unfamiliar with the RX series so can't really make a recommendation there.
Possibly in the meantime You have found the answer, too. The RX10IV cannot record unlimited, while the AX-700. For 50%-50% there is no question RX10IV. AX700 100% video 0% photo.
Do you have any old machines for me?
Sorry, I give my extra equipment to my students.
Honestly both Sony’s are (still) fully amazing prosumers ... that being said, better to choose/learn what actually gets shot an then edit out the junk in post with software that’s fit for your capture needs. 🎥
You can't edit in the super slow-motion that the AX700 offers... I'm particularly enjoying that capability. You're right, they are both excellent and I've yet to wear one out.
AX700 has user bits and time code which makes a huge difference to multi camera set ups, much more professional and helpful, the old 100 only has control track and time of day, about as useful as a chocolate teapot!
Good to know! Thanks for chiming in on that :)
Good demonstration, but voice is very low.
Which FDR-AX is Better FDR-AX700 or FDR-AX100 Can Someone Tell Me Which Camcorders Are Better Help Me Out Here🤷♂️
The AX700 is the top camera between these two.
Don't you wish there was 4k 60 fps ability on the AX700 ?
That would probably be a good thing and of course result in silky smooth videos..... but I haven't missed that frame rate so far, all looks good. 4K at 60 fps does use a lot of data also, BUT gives me the option to shoot at 60 fps and then drop it to 29 for a slowmo run... it would be great if it had it, but I don't have clients asking for that yet.
@@FrederickDunn I have had the AX53 for 2 years and just got a AX700 from a friend who did not use it any more. I shoot action videos such as alpine skiing and tennis and used the AX53 in HD mode at High Speed Recording at 100fps shutter speed at 215. Im not really sure how to shoot super fast action but I have found out that those settings are best that I know sofar. Im not familiar with 4K yet as my old computer could not handle 4K editing. I have a new Razer laptop that maybe can. Havent tried. What settings should I go for with the 700 or is the 53 a better camera for what I do? I also use it at low light and do a lot of followcam. Thanks
@@Triggerboy62 Just learn how to use proxy videos. As an example. Premiere has ingest option which lets you convert 4K to 1024x576 etc then use the actual 4K source when it comes to exporting. You can even toggle viewing source and proxy while editing.
I have a BIG question, how can i use the "Pause" and not STOP when i record a video, because i want to continue recording all in one video?
There is no workaround on that, a pause does make a break in the video sequence, adds another sequences.
Could you please do a video of the AX700 on the Ronin. I have a CX900 and plan to get the 700
the Ronin is fantastic, but I have to say that the "active" video stabilization built into the AX700 is so good that my ronin just sits on the stand unused. I will be sure to mention that the Ronin is in use in future videos if I do pick it up for a run and gun video sequence... Thanks for watching!
@@FrederickDunn I got the ronin for my ax 700. I'm not sure how much I'll use it though
If I'm moving around filming others who also moving, which would you pick?
100 or 700?
Definitely the 700, it has better facial tracking... or you can lock the focus to the center of the frame.
The Sony FDR AX-100 got more Megapixels. And both are having a one inch sensor. The AX-100 shots sharper images and videos in my opinion. On the other hand it comes in really handy sometimes to have to slots for sd-cards. I personally still prefer the AX-100. Thank you for your great video. :-)
They both have 14.2 Megapixels 16:9, I find the AX700 to be sharper than the AX100.. the sensors are different, though the same physical size. (13.2 mm x 8.8 mm) the AX700 focuses and tracks much faster than the AX100... glad you like your 100, we still use those, but the AX700 gets grabbed first these days.
Thank you so much for your respond and the helpful information. That's good to know, because actually I was thinking about to get myself a AX-700. Looks a bit bulky and a bit plasticy at the side where the handle is located which I personally don't like so much if it comes to esthetics but maybe I am wrong because I didn't held the camera in my hands yet. I'll check it out. ;-)
I have the Sony AX100. If you're using HD, it's simply perfect. Videos are clear and very smooth.
Everything works perfect except when you try use 4K. The minute you switch it to 4K, the screen becomes VERY SLOW and laggy. You will notice is even before you start recording. The videos you record will be clear but any kind of movement in the video such as someone moving or a waterfall and so on would be VERY LAGGY. I couldn't find a setting to fix that whatsoever. I tried all the different settings. I displayed vidoes directly from camera to 4K TV, after burning them into Blu Ray discs and using UHD Blu Ray player, through computer, every possible way. Still the same problem. The 4K videos on the AX100 camcorder are simply too laggy and not worth the price NOR the size of the camcorder.
It's not just my unit, I tried 5 other ones of the same model at different stores and they have the same problem. If you have the AX100, before you reply by saying you never noticed such a problem, please do the following:
Set the camcorder to 4K mode, no need to actually record. And move it around and try to have a moving object in front of it, even moving your hand if you have no other option. Then switch the file type to HD and try do the same thing. You will notice how it's 1000x smoother.
Did they solve this problem with the AX700?
Le 4k est en 25p ou 30p, or le FullHD est en 50 ou 60p toute la différence est là ! il faut savoir filmer en 25 ips, c'est une habitude à prendre:
1- Shutter au 1/50 ou 1/25 pour avoir du flou de mouvement
2- Faire des mouvements de caméra très lents
L'AX700 ne résoudra pas cela car pas de 50p ou 60p possible
Unfortunately AX100 records 4K at 25p (25 frames per second) the new one ax700 allows to increase frames rate to about 30p if you set NTSC but at 30p the moving subject are laggy too . Both cameras don't send signal 4K 50p Pal or 60p NTSC via HDMI to external recorder. That's frustrating.
1 - comme j'ai dit il faut savoir filmer en 25p
2- On peut exporter le 4k 25p en 30p très vite en doublant la 5ème images 123455123455etc...ça passe très bien sur ma télé 65" 4k qui extrapole en 50 ou 60p et avec du 30p elle arrive à suivre des mouvements rapides de près sans décrocher. On peut utiliser aussi FUX OPTIQUE de CC2015 pour exporter le 25p en 30p ou 50p mais c'est long ..6fois le temps réel avec mon ordinateur pour un export 4k 25p>>>4k 50p avec reconstitution images intermédiaires
3- en vidéo projection le downscal de 4k je le laisse en 25p et c'est pas génant du tout ...Pas plus que tous les films cinéma qui sont en 24p
The native 50p or 60p movie quality is higher than the artificially increased 25p at 50p or 60p. Starting at 25p you can't do slow motion. La qualité du film 50p ou 60p natif est plus élevée que la 25p artificiellement augmentée à 50p ou 60p. À partir de 25p, vous ne pouvez pas faire de ralenti.
Of course !!! But y se my film on a 65" 4k télé and the" interpolation" of the télé is good in 4k 25p very good in 4k 30p ..Effectivly is better to shot directly in 4k 50 or 60p but the good solution at minimal price is actually the Panasonic GH5 for this ...And now rather every body shot with Smartphone or action cam like Gopro ..The market is not enough large to motive Sony or other to study for a good not PRO caméra abble to shot in 50 60p 4k ...C'est triste mais c'est comme ça ..Y a Canon qui en a sorti une autour de 3000€ qui film en 50 60p 4k la XF400. Mais on est plus dans la même gamme de prix !
Sorry for my english y am french
Is the Remote jack on the right side compatible with LANC Controllers?
I am not sure about that, sorry.
It's have Multi ax700???
Not sure I understand the question?
i want to know how to zoom
There is a zoom rocker button on top...
Next time please open the port covers
Ok!
0:20 I could cry at this part, I've the Sony FDR-AX-100. So I've this old shoe, where newer microphons doesn't fit. I've a Sony edm-bm1 too, which is a newer microphone. So I'm simply looking for an adapter but since I'm not into that stuff, idk if there is a right one, I found many for lights etc. but I'm fucked🥲
If you know what I need to search for that, please help kkkkk
so what is conclusion...
You decide that on your own based on what you need. Both cameras are good. I prefer the AX-700... but both produce exceptional video sequences.
Wish the ax700 had nightshot
It does have Night Shot... in the camera menu it's under Camera Settings, below Low Lux, select NIGHTSHOT or NIGHTSHOT LIGHT. It has both and it's excellent.
R's parai
Too bad for the money you can't get 4k at 60fps... my Note 20 Ultra does 8k! Sony needs to refresh their HandyCam lineup
Glad you've found something better, and a little surprise you wasted your time watching this one given that the ground is well covered. Thanks for sharing.
@@FrederickDunn why would it be a waste of time? Thanks to you I won't be getting these anytime soon.
The best feature of the AX100 is that you can easaly focus on whatever you want, by pushing the screen on where you want to focus. I would never use auto focus, and it sounds like I would never upgrade, as that features is lost
No stabilization in both, no point to buy.
They both have built-in stabilization and it's very good.
Buy Mercalli 4 or 5 software and all stabilization camcorder problems are resolved at the editing table.
Where on Earth are 4K60 camcorders at the ~£600 mark?! I've been waiting for a 4K60 camcorder around this price range for about 8 years now. But every year all any of these companies seems to do is rebrand their 4K30 again!
The Sony AX-53 came out very late 2015 / early 2016, which in itself was a refresh of the AX-33. Are Sony really saying they have no better sensor and processor to make a new camcorder in 2020? So what do Sony do? They remove the EVF from the the AX-53, call it the AX-43 and then charge the same price as what you can already pick up the AX-53 for anyway!
Why is 4K60 taking so long to arrive at a non-pro price point? Phones and GoPros have been doing 4K60 for years and in many cases have even moved from this to 4K120 and 8K30. When are we going to see Panasonic or Sony bring this to ~£600 price point? HC-VX2 or AX-63? They wouldn't even need to spend that much money developing them either, they could keep the lens and OIS and body and everything else the same, just update the sensor and processors to give us 4K60 using H.265.There is no technical reason they can't, heat has nothing to do with it as I said phones and action cameras have done it for years and have a much tighter power/heat envelope to work within.
What annoys me most is all these companies keep crying out that 'phones are stealing all their customers' but then they are so slow to give us new features such as 4K60. Phones come out every single year and move things on significantly every single year, so is it really a surprise customers forget amount them?
For my use-case which is filming low league football, handheld, pitch side you do need a proper dedicated camcorder because the image stabilisation is much better on these than it is on a larger sensor mirrorless camera plus the fast electric zooming and super fast focusing is very much needed too. I just wish someone brought out 60fps version because I often need to slow down clips for goals or fouls, a 4K60 version of the AX43 or HC-VX1 would be a perfect camcorder.
.
@@FrederickDunn yep, looks like the camcorder really did die.
Bad sound
Bad sound in this video? Or bad sound from the unit? Please be more specific, thanks.