@@IturaldeRodel The financial incentive for private companies to run the cameras. Speeding, red light, everything. You don't speed? Ever? Lol. Sure. That doesn't matter to a camera that SAYS you were speeding, even if you were not.
@@jaehparrk I thought the report said 11 but even if it's 6, that's plenty of tolerance especially if around schools, suburbs, and high pedestrian traffic in cities.
@@CrinklyD I used to speed when I was younger and I copped it... In the last 15 years, I've had one speeding fine, and I earnt that one too. Corruption is a different matter but how would it be any different from a corrupt cop that says you were speeding? Actually, camera's are LESS prone to corruption because they have to take two pictures at set time intervals and by judging the distance the car has travelled between the two pictures, it's far more accurate to determine the actual speed of the vehicle.
No this is nothing but a cash grav from a private company. It's the same reason here in Georgia we're planning to get rid of then. Plenty of people have been ticketed during times outside school hrs.
@@drink15 100% agreed. I don't remember what place it was but the state decided to get rid of their camera's because it had a school zone speed limit of 45 and ppl were being caught doing 58... They called it corporate greed. I said something along the lines of.. its not surprising they don't care about the kids.
Wait till they make these things city wide. It will come.
So? Don't speed, don't break the law. What issue do you have with them?
@@IturaldeRodel The financial incentive for private companies to run the cameras. Speeding, red light, everything. You don't speed? Ever? Lol. Sure. That doesn't matter to a camera that SAYS you were speeding, even if you were not.
@@IturaldeRodel so anyone speeding 6miles over on empty road should have $100 or more dissapear into government's shadow realm? bad for economy
@@jaehparrk I thought the report said 11 but even if it's 6, that's plenty of tolerance especially if around schools, suburbs, and high pedestrian traffic in cities.
@@CrinklyD I used to speed when I was younger and I copped it... In the last 15 years, I've had one speeding fine, and I earnt that one too.
Corruption is a different matter but how would it be any different from a corrupt cop that says you were speeding? Actually, camera's are LESS prone to corruption because they have to take two pictures at set time intervals and by judging the distance the car has travelled between the two pictures, it's far more accurate to determine the actual speed of the vehicle.
Unconstitutional just like the red light cameras were.
Why not attach the cameras to the bus themselves?
Because our kids don't matter
buses move
great aspect the schools get the funds from the cameras.... right....
No this is nothing but a cash grav from a private company. It's the same reason here in Georgia we're planning to get rid of then. Plenty of people have been ticketed during times outside school hrs.
Jeez 11mph buffer? According to NHTSA 11mph more makes it over 25% more likely of a pedestrian death, especially with children.
Any place other than a school zone I'd be fighting these money making devices.
The laws the law, you break it you pay. If one can not follow the rules, they pay the price. This should be common sense.
@@thenomadthrifter right? at least in this case, they actually can confirm the law was broken.... cops on the other hand...
I have no problem with them making money from ppl that speed. Not sure why anyone would
@@drink15 100% agreed. I don't remember what place it was but the state decided to get rid of their camera's because it had a school zone speed limit of 45 and ppl were being caught doing 58... They called it corporate greed. I said something along the lines of.. its not surprising they don't care about the kids.
@@thenomadthrifterI mean if I’m facing a fine I want to see my accuser in court. So even know this is a good idea to reduce speed. I’m not for it.