Hey fry, thanks for checking it out and giving it another try! We'll work on the points you mentioned, such as AI and performance optimization. In the meantime, you can tweak certain AI settings under the 'custom' difficulty. Things like perception cone, perception threshold (how easy they can see you), and reaction time can be modified to tweak their behavior more to your liking. As always, thank you for your feedback!
Yeah, i saw people doesnt know about the AI customization. I've been having alot of fun setting up the settings for the AI, i think i found the perfect setup for it. Keep up the good work guys! Great game!
Cool, didn't know about the ai tweaking. Loving the offline extraction so far but I am worried about only having one map. I'd love to see an additional map before adding anything else.
I wish u guys to make game that will be on par with SPT. I really like EFT but hate online "D" copmarison with other people. I like cunning AI in single player games. Also inertia/movement for me is important and EFT got it pretty close to what I like for my immersion. Firearms complexity and realism is also what I really love in EFT. I hope u will consider at least giving option to players to disable eye magnification for non optic sights (I hate this idiot feature in games) Well I wish your game to be succesful SP version of games like EFT. Many people like to have fun with AI instead of cheaters or other humans in general in their gameplay. Cheers.
I was surprised to see my mods featured in the video, really didn't expect that haha. I'm also the same person who made bunch of mods for the Transience Demo when it came out
Game looks pretty cool in concept and the graphics, weapons etc.. but only one map between now and 2025 potentially seems kinda crazy. Aren’t the devs worried that most people will get bored pretty quickly?
ofc the playerbase will be less in a month, its the same with Palworld and other early access games, where people come back when there's new content... Even Tarkov have this, 3 months into each wipe, there's not a lot of the playerbase left playing except the giga chads and cheaters :) ... at least Incursion seems to have a solid foundation to add future content on. I bought it myself, and if i played the game a whole week, not much content would be left to explore.
@@jesperjakobsen3775 well, I didnt say less, I said evaporated. As they improve, it will be hard to get people to come back. They should have waited. The guns look great, the 3rd person running looks like poo. I tried the demo they had. I was in game for about 3 seconds before I took a head shot. The "game" is not ready and should not have been released in this state.
@@jesperjakobsen3775 A diminishing playerbase is understandable, but this guy said 'evaporates', as in just gone. *NOBODY* is playing, which in this game's current state I can certainly see. It 100% needed more time in the oven.
@@l3esme568 Good to hear, however there is no way it came far enough from that demo to have a game worth selling in just a few days. Even the people I hear taking about it in a positive way, say they played for a day or two and are done already. At least they are not charging $30-$40 for it. It has tons of positive reviews pointing out lack of content, so will these people stay positive or maybe update thier review. Depends on the updates I guess. I want to play a "done" version of what they have, wish them best, but I think they killed their own game by releasing it to early.
I'm a little disappointed in the decision to change the setting. Personally, I really liked the whole American setting they had going on with the semi trucks and the warehouses and shit, even if it was just placeholder. There aren't many games set in American Suburban Neighborhoods or Rural farmland.
@@Jankesoowski bro, we haven’t had many good Vietnam games in the last decade this isn’t an overused setting, a lot of us absolutely love Vietnam setting .
@@nofox777 Good for you guys. Go play it then. Personally I found war-torn America setting refreshing since last game that did this was Homefront 2 in... 2017? I also don't like when games do a complete 180* mid-developlent. It means that the devs lack vision and are not sure what they want from their game.
For anyone who wants to fix the issue where the AI can spot you from long distances follow these steps: Go to Settings>Gameplay - Scroll down to AI settings and set it to custom - Set "Perception Threshold" to around 0.15-0.20 - Set "Perception Range" to around 110-120 - Set "Perception Angle" to around 60-65 Additionally, you can increase the "On Target Aim Threshold" if you feel the AI has too good of an aim. Tweak these values until you are satisfied with how the AI plays.
i tried it for about 30 min but i didnt have a good time as of yet, its just not there yet for me but i can see some potential, my main issue is the ai they feel awful they dont see foliage like you do and its like they dont see rocks or hills ether, they also have a default detection range of 200 meters which seems a bit far for Vietnam at least for this first map.
Suggesting wish listing games that have 'potential' is a great idea. It really does help let the devs know there is interest, without us being suckered into funding a failed/discontinued project.
@@unselles no, not every unreal game has "mod support". This means mods are supported by the devs. They can be modded, sometimes with difficulty, but mod support means its supported by the devs
I feel like nowadays in not playing games anymore, but just straight unreal engine They all feel the same, ground branch, pubg, this game, ready or not, squad, GZW, Fortnite, sea of thieves, hell let loose All feels like the game is called unreal engine with different game modes
I remember the previous iteration where everything was Source. Talented enough developers will get us to the end state of Titanfall and Insurgency being built off the same base. Laziness will get us games where you boot it up and immediately think “is this a gmod map?”
Yeah I miss when games had their own special quirks. Imagine all the nostalgia Half-Life 2 and later GMod would be missing if Valve never made the Source Engine and just bought Unreal 2. What if Battlefield just stayed on commercial engines and DICE never made Frostbite? We’re losing so much as everyone moves to the same 2 engines, Unreal or Unity.
@@AxiamWolfe I remember turning on subtitles in Titanfall 2 for the first time and being surprised to see that despite Respawn ripping out and replacing 90% of Source’s code (their estimate), the subtitle display was completely unchanged from Half-Life.
AI is super hard to make fun to fight, ultimately you end up having them dumber than you’d think in order to let the player actually create the emergent gameplay. I like the direction this is going though.
9:48 that's not the worst. If you were down there, seeing a character silhouette on the edge of that cliff would probably have given you away from that perspective.
Thats not the point at all, its the fact he snapped onto him, and shot before he even fully brought the gun up (what they are doing is not syncing with the animations). Its immersion breaking. If we really want to knit pick, the ai doesnt even glance over at what he sees in his peripheral vision before drawing the gun and shooting?
The AI reaction is way too fast though, faster than a normal human can react to. A problem many PvE tactical games seem to have. And even then, detection's way too fast too.
@9:49 What is wrong with the AI behavior here? The player was in the 90° front sector of the AI soldier, withing range of easy visual identification and there was a clear unobstructed line of sight to a player in dark camo skylining against a bright blue sky. The problem with this sort of zero effort rants is that there is absolutely no essay-like structure or coherence. And sometimes not even basic comprehensible sentence structure. "Oh see like, look at that shit man. I can't... I like... I can't stand AI that is like that bro. I really can't. Um, it... it really just... it takes my enjoyment out of these games so much bro." This masterpiece of verbal diarrhea leaves the listener very ambiguous as to what exactly is meant by "like that bro". Like what exactly? And some listeners like @desensitized are more than eager to insert their own opinions into that ambiguity. If we give the game and the AI soldier reasonable benefit of doubt, and say that his "detection" happens one frame before he stops walking, then the time from detection to first shot is exactly 30 frames, ie. 0.5 seconds. That most certainly is fast. But I looked though some shooting competition footage from few years back, and my time from "port arms" to first shot with a rifle varies between 0.8 and 1.6 seconds, and I'm not a professional shooter, so I feel like this particular issue could be remedied by very subtle adjustment to the AI rection time. A half a second "looking at a thing" delay could do wonders here. So that when an AI goes from "unalerted" to "engaging" it will do a 0.5 second animation where it turns it's head to look at the thing that is causing it to get alerted. A sort of alertness build up time. But this is all assuming that he meant the reaction time. Which we don't know that he did.
I’ve had a good amount of fun with the game. It 100% needs way more content but what’s there gives me a ton of hope for the future. The shooting feels a bit wonky at times (leaves seem to block bullets) but the actual extraction shooter aspect is perfect.
Hey Bigfry, I'm not sure if you noticed, but this is, or was 'Project Quarantine'. You actually covered it a while back. I'm impressed they actually kept going on the project and to see where it is now. Obviously still needs more work, but I like the direction it's going.
@topjos12 I'd do SPT but the mod is kinda sketchy to me. Finding the actual mod is one thing, and then my anti virus blowing up and insisting that it's a Trojan was enough for me not to go through with it.
I kinda wish all these small teams making similar games on the same engine and things like that would just team up and make something a little bigger and more polished, nothing huge just 2 or 3 of these teams yea know? idk just something i think about =/
The problem is this needs to be better than the spTtarkov mod. Right now i can play tarkov ny myself with entirely customizable parameters. This game needs to do something new.
I don't think it needs to do that much new, given that SP Tarkov is the only other game that provides this kind of gameplay for PvE players. And Tarkov is very pricy.
Bought the game a few hours ago. It definitely needs some work, but the ground work is all there and has the potential to be great. That said their plan for the next year is worrisome consider the lack of content on the list.
I don't want to buy more games that offer me fun of less than 30h, my steam library is not only full of that, but also full of games that provide me with way more fun We don't have a lack of games with potential, but games that are actually fun for many houes
@@Exotic-_say thanks to news paper and tv s**t corporations that understand that UA-cam and internet is more efficient, I don’t know why they start pushing hard in those last couple of years, but they are pumping money into bots and stuff like that. Look under politicians channel lol even from country that you say how the hell he is interested in my politic? lol
Thats not the point at all, its the fact he snapped onto him, and shot before he even fully brought the gun up (what they are doing is not syncing with the animations). Its immersion breaking.
Truthfully. I refunded it after an hour. It just... it doesn't have the "it" factor. I'll wait a year and see what happens. Textures are muddy Sound is mediocre Content is lacking AI is either clueless or laser beams It ain't worth the cash at the moment.
Maybe if they could add random events or dynamic world, I think it really set it apart from the rest. You could run the same mission over and over, and each time it'd be different. One run takes 5 minutes, the next time it could take an hour. Some examples would be.....a brush/wildfire and you can use it to your advantage, or decide to go around it. Or other example is, you're moving into a small village with enemies and out of nowhere wild monkeys start to rob/attack the rebels.
9:47 Dude wtf is your problem? You are silhouetting against the sky. Just because mainstream games have extremly forgiving AI it doesnt mean it is a good design.
I just can't wait for someone to make the first good single player extraction shooter game. Single Player Tarkov is the only one and it is a mod. Once a new map is added to this I will 100% play but for now the 1 map gets boring for me after a few plays.
@@repax3997then I guess it would be fair to include chernobylite as well. Not quite the best in technical aspect but it's the closest we'll get to stalker 2 and single player tarkov for now.
I feel like it’s hard to have any opinion (as someone who hasn’t played it) right now. Looks good, but it’s super basic, only 1 map, AI needs A LOT of work and it’s super early. Like what is there to say so far, keep developing the game and adding to it for the next 2-3 years?
Felt like an unoptimized pre-alpha asset flip with random geometry thrown on a map (which i got stuck in). Got it in a bundle with SCP5K, which crashed a second before the spooky monster jumped at me (coop partner got spooked instead). 30 euro saved, loving the current gamedev meta.
im loving your new type of thumbnail bigfry, also regarding your last video, your community supports you and u have every right of making your living especially when you have a video game project develepment going on, good luck :D
Big bonus for this game so players can get content quicker & customisable experiences would be steam workshop and mod support. I think having more active and challenging AI, which patrol, hunt & have a wider variety such as bosses, etc, would really help create a more adrenaline fuelled experience with a nice challenge.
Gave this game a shot. Honestly I have been having a ton of fun so far. I haven't ran into any crashes yet. I have noticed a bug that caused some enemies to spawn without weapons, but apparently this was fixed in a patch a few hours later. The game does feel like its lacking some content. There is weapon variety and customization, but it doesn't feel like its enough. Playing the same 3-4 mission types over and over on the same map does kind of get old. There is no in game voice chat or text chat (at least that I could find) which makes playing with randoms kind of awkward. Id agree that the game definitely has potential and with it being early access ill cut it some slack. I'm looking forward to seeing how this game turns out.
Game is playable but i have a 3050 ti with only 4 gigs of vram and it showes. Settings are really senstitive and most of the textures fade out by end of match but no a single frame drop. I would love to be able to have the textures weather there shitty or not and the fps, ik its 4 gigs of vram but its possible yall. glad he has some texture issiues too no way he has only 4 gigs of vram so it cant be that i gusse they need to optimise it more. Like i can play squad, arma reforger, and red dead 2 on medium settings like 70 fps and it looks great. these new games though i dk wtf is going on but i can barely play em. Bodycam released and i had to refund it cuz they didnt even think of my gpu and i cant get above 20 fps. I can blast ready or not on allmsot max settings still getting 70-120 fps without a single loss of texture or pop in. Grey zone warfare, need at least 12 gigs of vram to play. I cant play that for anything it looks worse then roblox on this gpu. These games are getting a bit too ambitios graphic wise not everybody has a 4090. Mayby rockstar has some wazzard coding shit patented that nobody else can use idk but they where able to make red dead 2 look like real life even with 4 gigs of vram and still play at 60 fps and then here comes grey zone. obviously my solution here is upgrade but I'm basically homeless so going to be a bit before I can
So I’ve been playing it game isn’t bad but when you play co-op you can see how bad the players movement is really clunky looking kinda looks like a stick figure moving around backpacks floating off character looked really cheesy but that said guns feel good building guns was easy looting is plentiful. Ai out on patrols was really cool to see.
Ready or Not is unforgivable. HOLY SHIT do NOT recommend that game until the devs fix the AI on that game. the AI can literally shot you through walls. and the very small slight moment you do the SMALLEST peak. you're dead before u can see what killed you. I'm all for FPS games and RoN is a solid game, but the AI sucks(TOO OP) on that game where it pulls the enjoy of the game.
yeah in these kinds of games A good AI IS IMPORTANT and these kinds of games can be a pain if that AI is 💩and can shoot you before they ever see you or they just know your there and shoot you tho cover and i well not play games that are all mess up with their AI in this way. ready or not used to have this very problem at one time. right now that what i am trying to find out if this game has that problem with it AI because i don't want to waste my time with it if it dose. so thanks for the video
legit what is the actual point of single player pve? how is this fun or long term sustainable? zero replay value. Just make it a hybrid PVE COOP PVP. it's 2024 why in the world would we have games like this that will just die off on a few month. Why would anyone pay to play this just to shoot bots over and over, why.
My issue with his game is how little player interaction there seems to be. Caused by the lack of enemies in the map. I get its an extraction shooter, but when you get more interaction in Fortnite where you can go 5 minutes without seeing another player, that's where I got some problems. I'm not expecting Call Of Duty level chaos, but more interaction would help this game alot.
I enjoy the game. My biggest issue is the fps currently but I'm using a very low budget pc (Ryzen 5 2600 + RX6600). I have to run lowest then medium post processing to at least give some depth and medium to high textures. This pc can run MW3 though so no excuses. I do think the modding will push this game high.. Look at skyrim and other single player games. If they allow the modding it's a positive.
You don't need more maps for a good game. You need to CORE gameplay to be fun and rewarding. I think this game needs to figure out what it wants to be and how hard it wants it to be. I personally don't need 12 maps, 87 guns, for a game to be fun. All I need is a rewarding game loop. Also, @10:05 are you arguing that if you were that bot, you wouldn't see someone's entire head poke out over a cliff like that when silhouetted and in the open? I agree, AI in shooter games is incredibly hard to dial in. Either the AI are snipers that see you from a realistic distance but it's annoying, or they are blind and you can jump around 50ft in front of them and they don't see you. Maybe the game needs more of a nuanced system so it isn't either 'passive' or 'hostile'. The bots probably need a good reason to shoot you... just seeing you pop your head out shouldn't be enough to start firing. Bots need to feel like they have decision making and there needs to be a reason to engage in combat.
I mean for 13 dollars you don't recommend it? I feel like we really need to use a scale according to price a little bit. Considering 30 is the new 20, this is like 8 bucks. I mean it isn't but. I haven't picked it up yet but saw your review on steam and thought it was extremely nit picky for a 13 dollar game.
In all honesty I couldn’t get into tarkov for its difficulty and cheaters really, but this looks good. The team must be small but maybe they are going for quality over quantity. They could always expand the map but definitely if they need to optimize it I understand why one map. It’s a lot of variables going on. I’ll probably purchase this game this weekend. I may be wrong but I want to try and give them the benefit of the doubt it. Looks better than most extract shooters and they seem to take feed back well.
Yea, the AI is destroying my joy in the game. The perk of an offline pve game is you dont encounter hackers. But that goes out the window when AI have hacker level skill and ability to see through barriers and hip fire demolish you from 80 yards. I like what the game has to offer so I'm not refunding but I really need them to fix this pronto.
Seems the sole purpose of this game is to make some money on people waiting for gray zone to come out. Like really think about it. If this releases after that no one will buy it BUTTT BEFORE and it just gets the money of people waiting for that. That’s it. It’ll be done right around when gray zone comes out. A cheap little game to get some cheap little profits
I can admit when I am wrong. I played the first demo- loved it had close to 60 hours in it.loved it. I wasn't and am not a fan of jungle settings..let's be real- it looks bad ass. Sounds badass and it's really only going to get better- yeah it will prob be repetitive- is what it is.itll grow and it has a good fuckin base of the game so far. It's at 87 percent rn.
Scrounge around like a raccoon with a Kalashnikov … don’t enjoy those games, personally. Day Z, Warzone, et cet. ✌🏼🤣👍🏼 I’m glad other people like it, though
love the concept of this game and for me i think its a pretty fair price point right now, one where if the game does fizzle out i wont feel like i have been taken over a hay bail and if it turns out to be a banger well then ill feel like i stole it. i live life glass half full so iam hopeful!! do mid the Big energy you normally bring to a video though, hope your back with a bang soon!! keep up the great work and FK the moany bitches in comment sections!!!!
Game looks staggeringly like Tarkov, enough that one could be forgiven for confusing the two. I’m not a fan of Tarkov personally, though I haven’t played it since the overhaul update, so this is not super high up on my radar
Nah.... I'm tired of "early access with some potential" sitting in my steam library for ages. Six days in Fallujah, while cool, was a glorified demo at launch. This looks even lighter in content
This game was actually released into Early Access as :Operation Quarantine. It's been around for a minute but the original map was dogshit in comparison to the new map. but the game is still buggy as hell but has a lot of potential.
I dont get it, why you release something that is obviously still in the first stage. You must have a few maps and all the minor things fixed before you ask money for your product. It looks kinda boring why would I buy this now.
I might check out that game at some point, but it looks rough atm. I'm interested in something like it though, as I don't like pvp anymore. think I'd rather play SPT again however
Ground branch is twice as much as this, I’ll give incursion the good old collage try and see where they take it, let’s hope the devs will actually listen to their community so they don’t run the game into the ground.
It's 2024 and game devs still don't know what specular occlusion is. What's that shiny layer on the weapon and hands? Nobody from the dev team asked themselves this?
It’s in Pre Alfa. Don’t expect a polished release, it already looks good and is very playable. Considering pre Alfa is like this, I can’t wait for the final release.
see personally i'd rather have a decently polished early access that feels enjoyable now than playing something with more to pick from but most of which isn't very well touched, it's not really seeing what the devs are capable of if they just spread themselves to thin.
“I don’t plan on healing” you also don’t plan on stopping any bullets with that 0 out of 100 plate carrier you swapped your perfectly good armor for 🤦🏾♂️
it seems like yet other game to be called as experiment game and new devs trying to learn how to code and make games ( other dead game for quite more long time ) untill they learn and build game slowly into good game offering singleplayer tarkov exp or yet other game left by dev team making something else or just quit all together game making pity much we shall see what they will make over time
I bought ground branch In November, god it looked like crap and AI was absolute shit. If you’re saying ground branch is better then this is not a game I want to touch
No pvp? Hell nah Upd0: I mean i guess there is a player base for a pve extraction shooters, but if somebody decided to make a game for them, they are weird for me still.
Another upload another day without any cod gameplay, seems like it's trash, wonder if you will support the next game as much without actually playing the garbage
Why if it set in Vietnam there are vehicles with poland plates? Btw I bought it but it’s look like they used a lot of assets but well placed, hope they will do works
I bought this game cause of this video, Gunplay looks fun and yeah might just be one map and ai is still not great but it looks and plays fun so far, thanks for this video
I'm just glad someone is making an extraction shooter that is pve I love the concept of extraction shooters but I hate the toxic community that comes with a pvp game.
you'd lost my attention when you said it was a extraction shooter. but regained it when you said it was pve only which is something I've been waiting for. so ill keep an eye on it for now
Yea the Ai is just not good enough thats a deal breaker for me aswell. That 180 turn around the guard did in the quarry was the nail in the coffin for me.
I’ve been greatly enjoying what content there is at the moment. Can’t wait for more. I got it now with the expectation that the price would probably go up when more content gets added
Not really, not yet at least. It's tiny in things to do even for an early access, and it's so full of bugs it's often just unplayable. It needs to brew for few more years.
Ik how most see this and enjoy it but i dont see the point of game copying these types of formulas and then go out of their way to remove features or content built up from other games yknow to change it up a bit or differentiate it from others
PUBG had one map when it launched, so that means nothing to me. Innovation and gameplay are going to win the day, and I don't see either of those here. This looks like a generic objective shooter with poorly tuned AI. It's missing a component to make it unique, I think.
can i attatch 7 flashlights to my rifle? bcz thats the fun of tarkov, the extraction shooter its just a poor excuse to use my 7 flashlights at the same time
Hey fry, thanks for checking it out and giving it another try! We'll work on the points you mentioned, such as AI and performance optimization. In the meantime, you can tweak certain AI settings under the 'custom' difficulty. Things like perception cone, perception threshold (how easy they can see you), and reaction time can be modified to tweak their behavior more to your liking. As always, thank you for your feedback!
Yeah, i saw people doesnt know about the AI customization.
I've been having alot of fun setting up the settings for the AI, i think i found the perfect setup for it.
Keep up the good work guys! Great game!
And thank you dev for being so receptive to feedback.
Cool, didn't know about the ai tweaking. Loving the offline extraction so far but I am worried about only having one map. I'd love to see an additional map before adding anything else.
I wish u guys to make game that will be on par with SPT. I really like EFT but hate online "D" copmarison with other people. I like cunning AI in single player games. Also inertia/movement for me is important and EFT got it pretty close to what I like for my immersion. Firearms complexity and realism is also what I really love in EFT. I hope u will consider at least giving option to players to disable eye magnification for non optic sights (I hate this idiot feature in games) Well I wish your game to be succesful SP version of games like EFT. Many people like to have fun with AI instead of cheaters or other humans in general in their gameplay. Cheers.
@@maestro1231 That's great to hear, would you mind sharing your settings eventually in our discord?
I was surprised to see my mods featured in the video, really didn't expect that haha. I'm also the same person who made bunch of mods for the Transience Demo when it came out
Bro just dl your ghost hands
lookin forward to much much much more MODS Keep up the Awesome WORK! ❤❤🔥🔥
I'm curious where can we find your mods ?
@@Taldirok Nexus Mods
is there mods on this already?
Game looks pretty cool in concept and the graphics, weapons etc.. but only one map between now and 2025 potentially seems kinda crazy. Aren’t the devs worried that most people will get bored pretty quickly?
Just wrote out my Steam Review and wrote that exactly. "Replayability is at an All Time Low with only one map"
If i had to guess maybe they will slowly add to the existing map as time goes on like tarkov did.
@@BigfryTV Word bro yeah. Prob gonna try this our regardless but one Tarkov sized map is wild even for early access.
Especially without PvP servers
I assume they use this as a "proof of concept" and then plan to release a big update sorta like ready or not.
IMO it's way under cooked. I tried the demo, I'll pass. Willing to bet the player base evaporates in a month.
ofc the playerbase will be less in a month, its the same with Palworld and other early access games, where people come back when there's new content... Even Tarkov have this, 3 months into each wipe, there's not a lot of the playerbase left playing except the giga chads and cheaters :) ... at least Incursion seems to have a solid foundation to add future content on.
I bought it myself, and if i played the game a whole week, not much content would be left to explore.
@@jesperjakobsen3775 well, I didnt say less, I said evaporated. As they improve, it will be hard to get people to come back. They should have waited. The guns look great, the 3rd person running looks like poo. I tried the demo they had. I was in game for about 3 seconds before I took a head shot. The "game" is not ready and should not have been released in this state.
@@jesperjakobsen3775 A diminishing playerbase is understandable, but this guy said 'evaporates', as in just gone. *NOBODY* is playing, which in this game's current state I can certainly see. It 100% needed more time in the oven.
It's come a long way since the demo quality wise I really think it's worth a look for sure these are Devs that actually put in work.
@@l3esme568 Good to hear, however there is no way it came far enough from that demo to have a game worth selling in just a few days. Even the people I hear taking about it in a positive way, say they played for a day or two and are done already. At least they are not charging $30-$40 for it. It has tons of positive reviews pointing out lack of content, so will these people stay positive or maybe update thier review. Depends on the updates I guess. I want to play a "done" version of what they have, wish them best, but I think they killed their own game by releasing it to early.
I'm a little disappointed in the decision to change the setting. Personally, I really liked the whole American setting they had going on with the semi trucks and the warehouses and shit, even if it was just placeholder. There aren't many games set in American Suburban Neighborhoods or Rural farmland.
Exactly why I completely lost interest. Now it feels like Grey Zone: Warfare ripoff.
Wdym two completely different games
Idk man, most everyone loves Vietnam but we’re all entitled to be how we do
@@Jankesoowski bro, we haven’t had many good Vietnam games in the last decade this isn’t an overused setting, a lot of us absolutely love Vietnam setting .
@@nofox777 Good for you guys. Go play it then. Personally I found war-torn America setting refreshing since last game that did this was Homefront 2 in... 2017? I also don't like when games do a complete 180* mid-developlent. It means that the devs lack vision and are not sure what they want from their game.
For anyone who wants to fix the issue where the AI can spot you from long distances follow these steps:
Go to Settings>Gameplay
- Scroll down to AI settings and set it to custom
- Set "Perception Threshold" to around 0.15-0.20
- Set "Perception Range" to around 110-120
- Set "Perception Angle" to around 60-65
Additionally, you can increase the "On Target Aim Threshold" if you feel the AI has too good of an aim.
Tweak these values until you are satisfied with how the AI plays.
i tried it for about 30 min but i didnt have a good time as of yet, its just not there yet for me but i can see some potential, my main issue is the ai they feel awful they dont see foliage like you do and its like they dont see rocks or hills ether, they also have a default detection range of 200 meters which seems a bit far for Vietnam at least for this first map.
Suggesting wish listing games that have 'potential' is a great idea. It really does help let the devs know there is interest, without us being suckered into funding a failed/discontinued project.
@@Korelon7 No. No it's not.
Was 50-50 on buying the game but now that I've seen it has mod support, im 100% buying it.
it doesnt have official mod support yet, but they are talking about making a sdk
Every Unreal game has 'mod support', some developers just do their best to make it as painful as possible
@@unselles no, not every unreal game has "mod support". This means mods are supported by the devs. They can be modded, sometimes with difficulty, but mod support means its supported by the devs
@@atstrategist Yeah, that's why I put it in quotations. It supports custom content, but there's no official SDK.
I feel like nowadays in not playing games anymore, but just straight unreal engine
They all feel the same, ground branch, pubg, this game, ready or not, squad, GZW, Fortnite, sea of thieves, hell let loose
All feels like the game is called unreal engine with different game modes
I remember the previous iteration where everything was Source.
Talented enough developers will get us to the end state of Titanfall and Insurgency being built off the same base.
Laziness will get us games where you boot it up and immediately think “is this a gmod map?”
Yeah I miss when games had their own special quirks. Imagine all the nostalgia Half-Life 2 and later GMod would be missing if Valve never made the Source Engine and just bought Unreal 2. What if Battlefield just stayed on commercial engines and DICE never made Frostbite? We’re losing so much as everyone moves to the same 2 engines, Unreal or Unity.
@@AxiamWolfe I remember turning on subtitles in Titanfall 2 for the first time and being surprised to see that despite Respawn ripping out and replacing 90% of Source’s code (their estimate), the subtitle display was completely unchanged from Half-Life.
yup. Everything sorta feels like DayZ to me, just with different skins/graphics/maps. Sorta sucks TBH
A pirate game and kiddy trash feels the same as tactical shooters and a battlefield-like?
12:44 you can see the camera actor attached to the pawn, they forgot to disable the shadow
It's actually Ripley in her mech suit.
AI is super hard to make fun to fight, ultimately you end up having them dumber than you’d think in order to let the player actually create the emergent gameplay. I like the direction this is going though.
9:48 that's not the worst. If you were down there, seeing a character silhouette on the edge of that cliff would probably have given you away from that perspective.
Thats not the point at all, its the fact he snapped onto him, and shot before he even fully brought the gun up (what they are doing is not syncing with the animations). Its immersion breaking. If we really want to knit pick, the ai doesnt even glance over at what he sees in his peripheral vision before drawing the gun and shooting?
The AI reaction is way too fast though, faster than a normal human can react to. A problem many PvE tactical games seem to have.
And even then, detection's way too fast too.
@9:49 What is wrong with the AI behavior here? The player was in the 90° front sector of the AI soldier, withing range of easy visual identification and there was a clear unobstructed line of sight to a player in dark camo skylining against a bright blue sky.
The problem with this sort of zero effort rants is that there is absolutely no essay-like structure or coherence. And sometimes not even basic comprehensible sentence structure.
"Oh see like, look at that shit man. I can't... I like... I can't stand AI that is like that bro. I really can't. Um, it... it really just... it takes my enjoyment out of these games so much bro."
This masterpiece of verbal diarrhea leaves the listener very ambiguous as to what exactly is meant by "like that bro". Like what exactly? And some listeners like @desensitized are more than eager to insert their own opinions into that ambiguity.
If we give the game and the AI soldier reasonable benefit of doubt, and say that his "detection" happens one frame before he stops walking, then the time from detection to first shot is exactly 30 frames, ie. 0.5 seconds. That most certainly is fast. But I looked though some shooting competition footage from few years back, and my time from "port arms" to first shot with a rifle varies between 0.8 and 1.6 seconds, and I'm not a professional shooter, so I feel like this particular issue could be remedied by very subtle adjustment to the AI rection time.
A half a second "looking at a thing" delay could do wonders here. So that when an AI goes from "unalerted" to "engaging" it will do a 0.5 second animation where it turns it's head to look at the thing that is causing it to get alerted. A sort of alertness build up time.
But this is all assuming that he meant the reaction time. Which we don't know that he did.
So you can adjust the difficulty making the bots braindead, to making them Tarkov scary.
I’ve had a good amount of fun with the game. It 100% needs way more content but what’s there gives me a ton of hope for the future.
The shooting feels a bit wonky at times (leaves seem to block bullets) but the actual extraction shooter aspect is perfect.
Far cry 2 remastered looks pretty good.
Hey Bigfry, I'm not sure if you noticed, but this is, or was 'Project Quarantine'. You actually covered it a while back.
I'm impressed they actually kept going on the project and to see where it is now. Obviously still needs more work, but I like the direction it's going.
I am a simple man i see an extraction shooter i buy. The fact there is no pvp and offline play is a major bonus.
Just play SPT.
@@forrestallen9354 What is SPT?
Extraction shooters are so boring,god knows how you guys enjoy it.
@@DovahKunt Single Player Tarkov, it is a mod for EFT
@topjos12 I'd do SPT but the mod is kinda sketchy to me. Finding the actual mod is one thing, and then my anti virus blowing up and insisting that it's a Trojan was enough for me not to go through with it.
I kinda wish all these small teams making similar games on the same engine and things like that would just team up and make something a little bigger and more polished, nothing huge just 2 or 3 of these teams yea know? idk just something i think about =/
The problem is this needs to be better than the spTtarkov mod. Right now i can play tarkov ny myself with entirely customizable parameters. This game needs to do something new.
I love spt, but no co op.
I don't think it needs to do that much new, given that SP Tarkov is the only other game that provides this kind of gameplay for PvE players.
And Tarkov is very pricy.
@@crashbandit7270 Yes there is, SIT mod.
Bought the game a few hours ago. It definitely needs some work, but the ground work is all there and has the potential to be great. That said their plan for the next year is worrisome consider the lack of content on the list.
I don't want to buy more games that offer me fun of less than 30h, my steam library is not only full of that, but also full of games that provide me with way more fun
We don't have a lack of games with potential, but games that are actually fun for many houes
seriously. I played 1 run through and I'm already thinking, no what? No other maps until 2025? Seems very stale
God 2 OF bots already.
make that 3, wish YT would do something productive once
@@Exotic-_say thanks to news paper and tv s**t corporations that understand that UA-cam and internet is more efficient, I don’t know why they start pushing hard in those last couple of years, but they are pumping money into bots and stuff like that. Look under politicians channel lol even from country that you say how the hell he is interested in my politic? lol
Bigfry, @9:45 , he just saw you. If you were him, walking that way, and some guy was standing up on that hill, you would have seen him too.
Thats not the point at all, its the fact he snapped onto him, and shot before he even fully brought the gun up (what they are doing is not syncing with the animations). Its immersion breaking.
@@desensitized was def a fast reaction,
doesnt help when fry is crouch walking around the entire 20 mins
Truthfully. I refunded it after an hour. It just... it doesn't have the "it" factor. I'll wait a year and see what happens.
Textures are muddy
Sound is mediocre
Content is lacking
AI is either clueless or laser beams
It ain't worth the cash at the moment.
Maybe if they could add random events or dynamic world, I think it really set it apart from the rest. You could run the same mission over and over, and each time it'd be different. One run takes 5 minutes, the next time it could take an hour. Some examples would be.....a brush/wildfire and you can use it to your advantage, or decide to go around it. Or other example is, you're moving into a small village with enemies and out of nowhere wild monkeys start to rob/attack the rebels.
Monsoon weather would be sick
9:47 Dude wtf is your problem? You are silhouetting against the sky. Just because mainstream games have extremly forgiving AI it doesnt mean it is a good design.
I just can't wait for someone to make the first good single player extraction shooter game. Single Player Tarkov is the only one and it is a mod. Once a new map is added to this I will 100% play but for now the 1 map gets boring for me after a few plays.
STALKER 2
@@repax3997 1. it's not out.
2. it's not a extraction shooter.
@@repax3997then I guess it would be fair to include chernobylite as well. Not quite the best in technical aspect but it's the closest we'll get to stalker 2 and single player tarkov for now.
short answer: no
long answer:nooooo
me and a friend refunded this. Kinda buns. Shouldn't make someone pay for something like that.
I feel like it’s hard to have any opinion (as someone who hasn’t played it) right now. Looks good, but it’s super basic, only 1 map, AI needs A LOT of work and it’s super early. Like what is there to say so far, keep developing the game and adding to it for the next 2-3 years?
Or better yet, release in a more finished state.
This game made my 5800X3D + RX6750XT cry rivers of blood...
Felt like an unoptimized pre-alpha asset flip with random geometry thrown on a map (which i got stuck in). Got it in a bundle with SCP5K, which crashed a second before the spooky monster jumped at me (coop partner got spooked instead). 30 euro saved, loving the current gamedev meta.
Try SCP 5K again it’s so much fun. It’s improved a lot
@@kicolenidman5607 in 2 months? It's been out for years already afaik
im loving your new type of thumbnail bigfry, also regarding your last video, your community supports you and u have every right of making your living especially when you have a video game project develepment going on, good luck :D
The real question..can you one tap ? all the footage ive seen is mutliple shot to kill..how the hit box/hit register feels ?
This one felt like old school Fry! I had to check if I clicked the right video lol
Big bonus for this game so players can get content quicker & customisable experiences would be steam workshop and mod support. I think having more active and challenging AI, which patrol, hunt & have a wider variety such as bosses, etc, would really help create a more adrenaline fuelled experience with a nice challenge.
zzzzzzzz another extraction shooter
Looks.... ok.
We have tarkov at home
I honestly love the fact it’s PVE only.
Gave this game a shot. Honestly I have been having a ton of fun so far. I haven't ran into any crashes yet. I have noticed a bug that caused some enemies to spawn without weapons, but apparently this was fixed in a patch a few hours later. The game does feel like its lacking some content. There is weapon variety and customization, but it doesn't feel like its enough. Playing the same 3-4 mission types over and over on the same map does kind of get old. There is no in game voice chat or text chat (at least that I could find) which makes playing with randoms kind of awkward. Id agree that the game definitely has potential and with it being early access ill cut it some slack. I'm looking forward to seeing how this game turns out.
Game is playable but i have a 3050 ti with only 4 gigs of vram and it showes. Settings are really senstitive and most of the textures fade out by end of match but no a single frame drop. I would love to be able to have the textures weather there shitty or not and the fps, ik its 4 gigs of vram but its possible yall. glad he has some texture issiues too no way he has only 4 gigs of vram so it cant be that i gusse they need to optimise it more. Like i can play squad, arma reforger, and red dead 2 on medium settings like 70 fps and it looks great. these new games though i dk wtf is going on but i can barely play em. Bodycam released and i had to refund it cuz they didnt even think of my gpu and i cant get above 20 fps. I can blast ready or not on allmsot max settings still getting 70-120 fps without a single loss of texture or pop in. Grey zone warfare, need at least 12 gigs of vram to play. I cant play that for anything it looks worse then roblox on this gpu. These games are getting a bit too ambitios graphic wise not everybody has a 4090. Mayby rockstar has some wazzard coding shit patented that nobody else can use idk but they where able to make red dead 2 look like real life even with 4 gigs of vram and still play at 60 fps and then here comes grey zone. obviously my solution here is upgrade but I'm basically homeless so going to be a bit before I can
So I’ve been playing it game isn’t bad but when you play co-op you can see how bad the players movement is really clunky looking kinda looks like a stick figure moving around backpacks floating off character looked really cheesy but that said guns feel good building guns was easy looting is plentiful. Ai out on patrols was really cool to see.
Ready or Not is unforgivable. HOLY SHIT do NOT recommend that game until the devs fix the AI on that game. the AI can literally shot you through walls. and the very small slight moment you do the SMALLEST peak. you're dead before u can see what killed you.
I'm all for FPS games and RoN is a solid game, but the AI sucks(TOO OP) on that game where it pulls the enjoy of the game.
yeah in these kinds of games A good AI IS IMPORTANT and these kinds of games can be a pain if that AI is 💩and can shoot you before they ever see you or they just know your there and shoot you tho cover and i well not play games that are all mess up with their AI in this way. ready or not used to have this very problem at one time. right now that what i am trying to find out if this game has that problem with it AI because i don't want to waste my time with it if it dose. so thanks for the video
legit what is the actual point of single player pve? how is this fun or long term sustainable? zero replay value. Just make it a hybrid PVE COOP PVP. it's 2024 why in the world would we have games like this that will just die off on a few month. Why would anyone pay to play this just to shoot bots over and over, why.
My issue with his game is how little player interaction there seems to be. Caused by the lack of enemies in the map. I get its an extraction shooter, but when you get more interaction in Fortnite where you can go 5 minutes without seeing another player, that's where I got some problems. I'm not expecting Call Of Duty level chaos, but more interaction would help this game alot.
I’m enjoying the game so far. Less than 15 dollars. I’m happy with it. There will be more to come
I enjoy the game. My biggest issue is the fps currently but I'm using a very low budget pc (Ryzen 5 2600 + RX6600). I have to run lowest then medium post processing to at least give some depth and medium to high textures. This pc can run MW3 though so no excuses. I do think the modding will push this game high.. Look at skyrim and other single player games. If they allow the modding it's a positive.
You don't need more maps for a good game.
You need to CORE gameplay to be fun and rewarding. I think this game needs to figure out what it wants to be and how hard it wants it to be.
I personally don't need 12 maps, 87 guns, for a game to be fun. All I need is a rewarding game loop.
Also, @10:05 are you arguing that if you were that bot, you wouldn't see someone's entire head poke out over a cliff like that when silhouetted and in the open? I agree, AI in shooter games is incredibly hard to dial in. Either the AI are snipers that see you from a realistic distance but it's annoying, or they are blind and you can jump around 50ft in front of them and they don't see you.
Maybe the game needs more of a nuanced system so it isn't either 'passive' or 'hostile'. The bots probably need a good reason to shoot you... just seeing you pop your head out shouldn't be enough to start firing. Bots need to feel like they have decision making and there needs to be a reason to engage in combat.
I mean for 13 dollars you don't recommend it? I feel like we really need to use a scale according to price a little bit. Considering 30 is the new 20, this is like 8 bucks. I mean it isn't but. I haven't picked it up yet but saw your review on steam and thought it was extremely nit picky for a 13 dollar game.
In all honesty I couldn’t get into tarkov for its difficulty and cheaters really, but this looks good. The team must be small but maybe they are going for quality over quantity. They could always expand the map but definitely if they need to optimize it I understand why one map. It’s a lot of variables going on. I’ll probably purchase this game this weekend. I may be wrong but I want to try and give them the benefit of the doubt it. Looks better than most extract shooters and they seem to take feed back well.
Yea, the AI is destroying my joy in the game. The perk of an offline pve game is you dont encounter hackers. But that goes out the window when AI have hacker level skill and ability to see through barriers and hip fire demolish you from 80 yards. I like what the game has to offer so I'm not refunding but I really need them to fix this pronto.
Seems the sole purpose of this game is to make some money on people waiting for gray zone to come out. Like really think about it. If this releases after that no one will buy it BUTTT BEFORE and it just gets the money of people waiting for that. That’s it. It’ll be done right around when gray zone comes out. A cheap little game to get some cheap little profits
For 16€ and its a good tarkov like for beginners or more chilled.
BUT one map is kinda meh... Despite that I will follow this game
I can admit when I am wrong.
I played the first demo- loved it had close to 60 hours in it.loved it. I wasn't and am not a fan of jungle settings..let's be real- it looks bad ass. Sounds badass and it's really only going to get better- yeah it will prob be repetitive- is what it is.itll grow and it has a good fuckin base of the game so far. It's at 87 percent rn.
Scrounge around like a raccoon with a Kalashnikov … don’t enjoy those games, personally. Day Z, Warzone, et cet. ✌🏼🤣👍🏼
I’m glad other people like it, though
love the concept of this game and for me i think its a pretty fair price point right now, one where if the game does fizzle out i wont feel like i have been taken over a hay bail and if it turns out to be a banger well then ill feel like i stole it. i live life glass half full so iam hopeful!! do mid the Big energy you normally bring to a video though, hope your back with a bang soon!! keep up the great work and FK the moany bitches in comment sections!!!!
Game looks staggeringly like Tarkov, enough that one could be forgiven for confusing the two.
I’m not a fan of Tarkov personally, though I haven’t played it since the overhaul update, so this is not super high up on my radar
Nah.... I'm tired of "early access with some potential" sitting in my steam library for ages. Six days in Fallujah, while cool, was a glorified demo at launch. This looks even lighter in content
This game was actually released into Early Access as :Operation Quarantine. It's been around for a minute but the original map was dogshit in comparison to the new map. but the game is still buggy as hell but has a lot of potential.
I dont get it, why you release something that is obviously still in the first stage. You must have a few maps and all the minor things fixed before you ask money for your product. It looks kinda boring why would I buy this now.
I might check out that game at some point, but it looks rough atm. I'm interested in something like it though, as I don't like pvp anymore.
think I'd rather play SPT again however
Ground branch is twice as much as this, I’ll give incursion the good old collage try and see where they take it, let’s hope the devs will actually listen to their community so they don’t run the game into the ground.
It's 2024 and game devs still don't know what specular occlusion is. What's that shiny layer on the weapon and hands? Nobody from the dev team asked themselves this?
It’s in Pre Alfa. Don’t expect a polished release, it already looks good and is very playable. Considering pre Alfa is like this, I can’t wait for the final release.
see personally i'd rather have a decently polished early access that feels enjoyable now than playing something with more to pick from but most of which isn't very well touched, it's not really seeing what the devs are capable of if they just spread themselves to thin.
“I don’t plan on healing” you also don’t plan on stopping any bullets with that 0 out of 100 plate carrier you swapped your perfectly good armor for 🤦🏾♂️
yeah no reason to really buy this when the guys over at AKI-SPT have just released 3.8.0 which adds ground zero and the shoulder swap mechanic.
it seems like yet other game to be called as experiment game and new devs trying to learn how to code and make games ( other dead game for quite more long time ) untill they learn and build game slowly into good game offering singleplayer tarkov exp or yet other game left by dev team making something else or just quit all together game making pity much
we shall see what they will make over time
I bought ground branch In November, god it looked like crap and AI was absolute shit. If you’re saying ground branch is better then this is not a game I want to touch
No pvp? Hell nah
Upd0: I mean i guess there is a player base for a pve extraction shooters, but if somebody decided to make a game for them, they are weird for me still.
I run a i13700k and a 4070ti, epic settings, lumen enabled fps are between 90-144. So maybe it got optimized in the last weeks.
Another upload another day without any cod gameplay, seems like it's trash, wonder if you will support the next game as much without actually playing the garbage
Telling you friend, modern Vietnam look nothing like that 😂😂
And Ai problems is not FPS alone, RTS also like in Total war is a big problem
I wouldn't buy this for 5 dollars. The is a boring looking game. I can't stand AI that see you when a single pixel becomes visible to them.
i mea nwe do not need COD levels of maps here guys, i mean Tarkov only has like.. what? 1? 2 maps maybe? (haven't played Tarkov)
Just got it yesterday. Played it like 3 hours straight. Its welcomly chill. I like it! but it still needs a lot of work, which is Okay, its an Alpha.
Why if it set in Vietnam there are vehicles with poland plates? Btw I bought it but it’s look like they used a lot of assets but well placed, hope they will do works
Still better then chetarkov 😂😂😂 its what we need co - op tarkov stuff pvp suck ass becouse you know its not fair ... 😢
Multiplayer games suck ass becouse of cheaters :/
And there are no Cure for it ...
just play MPT, it's literally tarkov but with coop & mods lol
@@APunishedManNamed2 i will 😉
I bought this game cause of this video, Gunplay looks fun and yeah might just be one map and ai is still not great but it looks and plays fun so far, thanks for this video
I'm just glad someone is making an extraction shooter that is pve I love the concept of extraction shooters but I hate the toxic community that comes with a pvp game.
Am I the only ones loving the AI’s on super hard? Reminds me of “ the division “ in its glory days before full classified striker sets
you'd lost my attention when you said it was a extraction shooter. but regained it when you said it was pve only which is something I've been waiting for.
so ill keep an eye on it for now
Yea the Ai is just not good enough thats a deal breaker for me aswell. That 180 turn around the guard did in the quarry was the nail in the coffin for me.
I’ve been greatly enjoying what content there is at the moment. Can’t wait for more. I got it now with the expectation that the price would probably go up when more content gets added
This is a paid promotion of the game - you should put the sponsored tag in your video. Reported for misleading and false advertisement.
Not really, not yet at least. It's tiny in things to do even for an early access, and it's so full of bugs it's often just unplayable. It needs to brew for few more years.
Shame about the Cycle , I found that game rather fun . Esp that pistol shot gun rofl . Nice graphics I will admit .
I will say i like that the recoil is semi realistic, the way 5.56 jumps around in tarkov just isnt even remotely believable.
Ik how most see this and enjoy it but i dont see the point of game copying these types of formulas and then go out of their way to remove features or content built up from other games yknow to change it up a bit or differentiate it from others
PUBG had one map when it launched, so that means nothing to me. Innovation and gameplay are going to win the day, and I don't see either of those here. This looks like a generic objective shooter with poorly tuned AI. It's missing a component to make it unique, I think.
PUBG’s one map was 8x8km though, lots of space to explore
I'm supporting it, they didn't set it to a scumbag price...so I'll get a few hours in and get my value out of it.
i think this game would be fun with other people, but i think the AI definitely needs to be more of a focus over content, as of this video.
can i attatch 7 flashlights to my rifle? bcz thats the fun of tarkov, the extraction shooter its just a poor excuse to use my 7 flashlights at the same time
Nice map build,elevations and drama in the map,should have been a pvp mode,looter extracter. sad...
Game is fun but pretty bare bones at the moment. Thankfully, unlike most people, I know how to make my own fun
Started the game, changed graphics, game crashes and never works again. Refunded immediately.