Andrew Neil slams 'political elite' at Ministry of Defence in fear of repeat of 1930s

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 100

  • @rpb583
    @rpb583 14 годин тому +31

    Worked at the MOD in IT for years, the utter waste and general red tape is beyond and belief.

  • @trevermcdonald2402
    @trevermcdonald2402 Годину тому +3

    By all means scrap or sell on outdated equipment but not before its replacements are available. If your roof leaks in places you don’t remove the whole roof and wait for four or five years to replace it. We need to spend at lease 5% of our GDP on defense not a Kier Smarter promise of half that amount, a promise he has not as yet made good.

  • @stevenbowman7766
    @stevenbowman7766 10 годин тому +12

    A Roman once said if you want peace prepare for war , good now as it was 2000 years ago , peace and ignorance is what started WW2 , not willing to arm ones army is fatal !!!

  • @jameswalters1580
    @jameswalters1580 14 годин тому +21

    Well said. Loss of Bulwark and Albion is a terrible decision.

    • @catherinemartin6258
      @catherinemartin6258 14 годин тому +5

      The Tory’s already binned it for ten years they just wanted someone else to make the hard choices

    • @johnmunro4952
      @johnmunro4952 14 годин тому +2

      Yup. Plenty more hiding under the rug by the Tories

    • @antonysmyth2464
      @antonysmyth2464 13 годин тому +2

      Really, neither ship is able to go to sea, and does not have up to date protections.

    • @fenderek666
      @fenderek666 9 годин тому +2

      And you gonna do what with them- rust the enemy?

  • @garyb455
    @garyb455 3 години тому +3

    Borrowing in October was the second highest in History, it won't be long before Labour run out of other people's money.

  • @jeremysmith3786
    @jeremysmith3786 12 годин тому +6

    We need Andrew Neil to question all parties in House of Commons, he's one of the few to speak truth to power

    • @kurtgodel5236
      @kurtgodel5236 5 годин тому

      That Andrew Neil's gone for good.The new Andrew Neil is an ex-GBNews loony.

  • @762parabillim
    @762parabillim 11 годин тому +5

    A little unfair to cut off Gen C at that point.

    • @LeafBurrower
      @LeafBurrower 5 годин тому

      He wasn’t following the script.

  • @guytr8124
    @guytr8124 9 годин тому +3

    Neil is a loser to cut his guest off like that. Not interested in ascertained the real position.

  • @davidl.howser9707
    @davidl.howser9707 9 годин тому +1

    I LOVE THIS MAN ! Andrew eil You Are My New Hero !!!

    • @LeafBurrower
      @LeafBurrower 5 годин тому

      He bigged this interviewee up, then didn’t like what he said and pretended he knew more than him. Some hero.

  • @collintrytsman3353
    @collintrytsman3353 14 годин тому +11

    AS AN EX SOLDIER I AM ASHAMED OF THE STATE OF OUR ARMED FORCES WE CAN NO LONGER CLAIM TO BE A TEAR ONE MILITARY...........SHAME ON THIS GOVERNMENT

  • @NumptyBumpty-w9j
    @NumptyBumpty-w9j 12 годин тому +6

    Is Poland the only country a wake in Europe

    • @gillianbrown8502
      @gillianbrown8502 12 годин тому

      Not sure, but they would be next in line for invasion if Ukraine falls.

    • @andrzejkwasny8012
      @andrzejkwasny8012 7 годин тому

      Yes together with others in eastern Europe they were accused of Russophobia by the western political elites happy to take every crooked , stolen ruble .

  • @Arronreviews
    @Arronreviews 4 години тому

    I've worked on the drones and they may as well been nothing other than wasting money they never worked and hardly ever flown, full of issues and wasted time

  • @IB4theAIB
    @IB4theAIB 14 годин тому +9

    “Incomptent”?

  • @bannjaxx
    @bannjaxx 4 години тому

    I love how "incompetent" is misspelled on the thumbnail - very good 😄

  • @davidlockwood9915
    @davidlockwood9915 Годину тому

    I am Labour but admit that Starmer needs to step up to the Mark. The Tories fooled it up. Are we doomed???

  • @sej8806
    @sej8806 9 годин тому

    So sad, but so true.

  • @keithjackman8886
    @keithjackman8886 10 годин тому +1

    We are currently being invaded are we are proving impotent.

  • @GrooveTasticThang
    @GrooveTasticThang 14 годин тому +9

    Totally correct analysis- politicians spend their time with their noses in the troughs - spending more time eking out taxes from every corner but fail to look far enough ahead for strategic planning.

  • @collintrytsman3353
    @collintrytsman3353 14 годин тому +2

    at least we developed the spitfire and national radar network prior to WW2......................can we say we are doing anything at all like that this time around???

  • @longandshort6639
    @longandshort6639 14 годин тому +5

    Labour now weakening our defence. What did you expect?

    • @chrisbirmingham5132
      @chrisbirmingham5132 10 годин тому +6

      "The real villain here is not the new Labour government, but the last 14 years of Tory rule". I don't always agree with Andrew Neil, but that is obviously true.

    • @LeafBurrower
      @LeafBurrower 5 годин тому

      Neill didn’t like hearing that the procurement program works well for the most part.

  • @funnythat9956
    @funnythat9956 26 хвилин тому

    forget about Taiwan; the UK has no role to play there

  • @fishernz
    @fishernz 9 годин тому +1

    Andrew Neil is not a good fit with Times Radio. Too bombastic.

  • @VaucluseVanguard
    @VaucluseVanguard Годину тому

    I went through the British Army/Joint staff system 25 years ago. At that time advanced staff training for Army officers was divided into two halves. The first half (12 months) was called the Defence Technology Course (DTC), this was designed to give individuals the knowledge and skills needed to become staff officers in the procurement system. A number of students only did that half, and did not go on to the second year where military - warfighting - planning and higher defence policy was the focus. I think it would be fair to say, that at the end of the course, around a third of students were 'streamed' into procurement for the rest of their career. This was essentially the lowest third in ability. Those in the top third would be streamed for higher command, which may include a couple of jobs in procurement on their way to being a general. However, it was fair to say the least able were doing our procurement. The cohort I went through staff training are now either senior generals or will have left for lucrative jobs in industry/commerce if they were in the top half but not destined for the very top. The lowest third will be the ones who have hung on, knowing they would not pick up better paid jobs with a good pension if the left. Because the retirement age was extended to 60, a fair few of these are still serving. While that system has changed, the backbone of Army staff officers in procurement for the past 40 yeads came from, to be frank, hardly the sharpest tools in the box.

  • @Nickbaldeagle02
    @Nickbaldeagle02 10 годин тому

    Times can't spell incompetent.

  • @davidrobertson9271
    @davidrobertson9271 14 годин тому +5

    Oh dear, Andrew! Do you understand what obsolete means? In fact our two new aircraft carriers are sitting ducks and totally unnecessary.

    • @Travis_22
      @Travis_22 14 годин тому +3

      They always were a complete waste of money. They don't even have a full compliment of aircraft ffs.

    • @minty258
      @minty258 14 годин тому +1

      Clearly you lack the knowledge of modern naval warfare and the role of aircraft carriers

    • @jstoner9029
      @jstoner9029 14 годин тому +1

      @@minty258aren’t they supposed to have aircraft on them? The clue is in the name.

    • @alanrobertson9790
      @alanrobertson9790 10 годин тому

      Although I agree with you about the aircraft carriers as taking up too much of the budget they are not obsolete so not sure what your argument is.

    • @davidrobertson9271
      @davidrobertson9271 2 години тому

      @@alanrobertson9790 This is the age of precision guided weapons. Traditional aircraft carriers are sitting ducks

  • @grannyroberts
    @grannyroberts 4 години тому

    The Bible verse that says "woe to them that call evil good, and good evil" is Isaiah 5:20:

  • @12346rossi
    @12346rossi 13 годин тому +1

    only 9 million what are we suppose to use man harsh language ?

  • @hdavies0
    @hdavies0 9 годин тому +2

    Spends half the segment reading from a polemic and then cuts off the expert when he disagrees with him. Tired dinosaur that belongs in the 1990s.

  • @pgsmith22
    @pgsmith22 12 годин тому +1

    Neil gets in a short jab, which is responded to with "now thats not fair", but the convo and indeed this video are quickly cut. Come on now.

  • @stephfoxwell4620
    @stephfoxwell4620 14 годин тому

    ? literally ridiculous

  • @petermclelland278
    @petermclelland278 13 годин тому +3

    It's not the 1940s Andrew. The commando "storming ashore" days are gone. The junk they're scrapping won't last 5mins in this deadly missile age. Time for your nap & meds Andy lad. Sleep well.Sleep well 😴

  • @jamesbenjamin8078
    @jamesbenjamin8078 10 годин тому +1

    Why do you use such an absurdly youthful and therefore dishonest image of Neil to promote this video?

  • @jodu626
    @jodu626 11 годин тому +1

    unfortunate spelling

  • @johnholkham2420
    @johnholkham2420 10 годин тому

    I wonder where those 50 year old helicopters will end up ? Ukraine. Do we really need 2 mega aircraft carriers, only built to gain favour for the upcoming Scottish independence referendum.

  • @FlorianaLions
    @FlorianaLions 4 години тому

    Times Radio is so bad it can't even spell 'incompetent' correctly ....mugs.

  • @MatheusJoseDias
    @MatheusJoseDias 11 годин тому +1

    Time to retire Neil

  • @jstoner9029
    @jstoner9029 14 годин тому +5

    There is no one more incompetent than Andrew Neil. 🎉

    • @twoeggcups
      @twoeggcups 14 годин тому +1

      Well, quite. GB News went well, didn't it Andrew?

    • @FN-hg2el
      @FN-hg2el 12 годин тому +2

      Do you remember when he dodged interviewing Boris Johnson yet he had interviewed all the other candidates for PM.

  • @antonysmyth2464
    @antonysmyth2464 13 годин тому +1

    AN is not qualified, or a suitable type of interviewer for this work. Please move him back to UK politics where he is worth following.

  • @thomasmills9492
    @thomasmills9492 13 годин тому +2

    Unfortunately Labour has been Politically Inept in most of its announcements since taking office. Pensioners, Farmers etc...

    • @gillianbrown8502
      @gillianbrown8502 12 годин тому

      Just like their Tory predecessors. The country has been crying out for intelligent leadership for decades.

  • @AmandaHuggankiss
    @AmandaHuggankiss 13 годин тому +2

    Well done labour voters. Slow clap

    • @alanrobertson9790
      @alanrobertson9790 10 годин тому +1

      Labour are bad but the Conservatives weren't much better which is why people voted Reform so that Labour got in.

    • @AmandaHuggankiss
      @AmandaHuggankiss 10 годин тому

      @alanrobertson9790 no. People voted Tory (labour in blue) that's how labour got in

    • @alanrobertson9790
      @alanrobertson9790 9 годин тому

      @@AmandaHuggankiss Indeed, but real Labour dangerous quickly whilst Labour in blue just did nothing and let the frog boil. I want end to most migration and end to net carbon zero policies. Whether Labour or Conservative the result is the same and the policies are never put to the electorate.

    • @LeafBurrower
      @LeafBurrower 5 годин тому

      @@alanrobertson9790 You want that, but not everyone else does, obv.

  • @dub604
    @dub604 15 годин тому +8

    Andrew Neil? Again? Why are Times Radio trying so hard to resurrect Neil's failed career? He's been a national joke since his stint at GBeebies. 🤣😂 Why does Times Radio (Rupert Murdoch) love this old curmudgeon so much? God knows nobody else can stand him.

    • @afp0756
      @afp0756 14 годин тому +6

      Because he is V V Good

    • @dub604
      @dub604 14 годин тому +1

      @@afp0756 Then why is this YT channel the only place he can get any work? If he's so great why isn't he on TV anymore? Answer... He ruined his career and is now desperately trying to reinvent himself.. Murdoch of course is playing along but nobody else is. Try again.

    • @mr.mayhem7402
      @mr.mayhem7402 14 годин тому +4

      The real question why is such an outstanding journalist with his heavy weight pedigree and highly regarded reputation for forensic questioning and detailed knowledge of politics and economics, wasting his time with TR?

    • @dub604
      @dub604 14 годин тому +1

      @@mr.mayhem7402 We all know why he's in this position.. It's simple. He went over to GBeebies because he thought it would work out for him, in doing so he announced that he was a card carrying member of the far right. He now can't get any work through a reputable media group because nobody wants to be associated with a sociopath (except Murdoch of course).

    • @dub604
      @dub604 14 годин тому +1

      @@mr.mayhem7402 We all know why he's only getting work on this one YT channel. He ruined his career when he went over to GBeebies. He's a hack and always was.