You can actually turn some of these systems off in the settings, and when they activate, they only hold the pressure until you put your foot back on the brake or gas pedal. So you can get as close as you want but of course the beeping might still persist.
I know crash tests are a thing and I’ve watched plenty of them. Something about them being outside in a regular looking setting has me like who’s paying for all this?😅 They backed into that Outlander and it wasn’t even part of the test
The question is, who's gonna pay for all the extras bells and whistles in the car when the goverment says they need to be implemented as standard equipment..?
usually its government regulation and the car manufacturer will pay for it. For Euroncap, they car company will pay them the money, and the agency will pretend like a normal consumer and purchase a new car from a random dealer before putting it in crash test.
@@Nickoboss29 yeah, but it’s still handy to have. People should also be aware at all times and avoid every accident, yet it doesn’t make seatbelts and airbags redundant.
Good thing I pay attention to my surroundings. Avoided not bumping the rear end of another vehicle as we both backed out at the same time from opposite sides. Went from reverse to first gear right after stopping my 2023 Honda Civic Si. Returning back to my parking spot. So I didn't get hit from the oblivious driver who didn't have a rear view camera on his early 2000s Ford Focus.
@@oatmealtheecat8188 Makes me thankful that Honda's doesn't do that, though it still nearly slams on the breaks during the Traffic Jam Assist sometimes
Im actually surprised the Hyundai failed so miserably considering they are often praised for having the latest tech features. Guess it doesn't apply to safety necessarily lol.
The thing I notice here is that these vehicles have effectively no rear bumpers. The Honda CR-V for example took tailgate damage because there was only a inch or so of bumper to compress and take the impact of the pole before the pole was driven into the tailgate causing paint transfer and actual body panel damage. Rear auto brake may help but maybe having bumpers that have enough crumple zone to handle these sorts slow speed impacts would be a cheaper solution or even just a passive backup in case the autobrake fails to respond.
I have been hit twice by drivers that reversed out of their parking spot in parking lots without looking, the first time was an ubereats driver, and he claimed that I came out of no where, I told, him, that it was him who was not paying attention while driving, he even claimed that he had a quick glance to his phone, that costed his insurance almost 10000$ in repairs for my car. The second time was in Ottawa with a rental car, the damn driver was old and I saw him start to reverse on me, I started honking and my hand stayed at the horn while he did his whole stupid maneuver he backed out slowly and never reacted tkt he horn, he kept backing up until he lifted the car, he was thankfully going so slow, that no damage was caused, so we just agreed that there was no need for insurance claims. This feature is very welcomed by me especially in North America where people take driving for granted
Bro that Hyundai FAILED. Who the hell gave it a Basic rating??? If those objects were real, they would have stopped the car long before it applied the brakes.
Bought my wife a new Buick Envision with this feature and she loves it - Apparently Ford and Honda have the best systems according to this video though I guess.
As an employee at a Hyundai dealer I can confirm that the system performs much better than shown here. It seems like they have the feature deactivated.
Auto brake is a good feature I guess but my brakes slammed themselves on very hard when I was getting too close to a small bush and it scared the hell out of me…
Fun fact! There's tons of people out there who will turn these off because they claim to be better drivers than most. Yet, according to statistics and math, that's a lie, and what they really mean is that they are the worst driver on the road if the tech is bothering them.
@phillipvelednitskiy6881 I hit part of wall decoration with a ford ranger and broke the rear light, in less than 2 hours i bough a replacement light and replaced it for less than $150. $7000 is ridiculous, that's a good used car
@@zero2sixty244 ok but I have been in some Sentra’s and the sensors are not that sensitive depending on the setting you have it in Nissans are a good choice of cars for me but it’s your opinion No Offense
I live in Italy, where people park with a 1-cm gap. With this system, you'll have to find parking in a field
You can actually turn some of these systems off in the settings, and when they activate, they only hold the pressure until you put your foot back on the brake or gas pedal. So you can get as close as you want but of course the beeping might still persist.
@@MaxMax-rw8so turn it off?
@@ryb2968 important not to forget to turn it on later 😁
It's only because they were going fairly fast, drive slower and the system won't be triggered.
After visiting and renting a car in Milan I can confirm this guy isn't exaggerating 😂😂😂
I like how they did the test with the system on, then crashed the cars anyways to show without the system active... but showed the Off first.
I was reversing quickly towards a bush and my CR-V slammed on the breaks and scared the shit out of me haha. At least i know it works lol.
@@WoWdOm18 mine picks up my neighbors trash can across the streets and gives me whiplash. 👍🏼
My Honda Prologue came to a complete stop from 55 mph when a jerk pulled out in front of me. I felt my soul leave my body haha
@@noxnyc23 My wife's Buick Envision will send you into the backseat 😂 But at least we know the system works and that the thing has great brakes lol.
So basically still look for yourself.
They deliberately turned the system off to test how much damage will be without the system. If the system is on it will prevent accident.
@@dkdanis1340you clearly didn't watch the full video, he was talking about the 2nd part of the test
@@robinbm553 yuuupppp
@@robinbm553 what do you mean by second part? Pretty much all the cars did well except the Tucson and maybe Taos.
I know crash tests are a thing and I’ve watched plenty of them. Something about them being outside in a regular looking setting has me like who’s paying for all this?😅 They backed into that Outlander and it wasn’t even part of the test
The question is, who's gonna pay for all the extras bells and whistles in the car when the goverment says they need to be implemented as standard equipment..?
@@chriskonte1909 you are
@omostim2385 well it IS part of the test, otherwise they wouldn't be crashing into it.
usually its government regulation and the car manufacturer will pay for it.
For Euroncap, they car company will pay them the money, and the agency will pretend like a normal consumer and purchase a new car from a random dealer before putting it in crash test.
@@scott8919 Except they never tested it’s auto braking. Just how much it would cost to repair
Korean tech is more advertised than working
True
May be IIHS should instead ask why are repair bills so expensive for such a small crash
Am I missing something with the Tuscon? It “failed” every test. Does it not have the sensors, are they garbage, or does it only alert and not brake?
@@PlanetLinuxChannel It's a Hyundai.
This feature should be made mandatory.
If you can't drive
@@Nickoboss29 humans are not infallible. In the 1 in 10 million chance a "good" driver might need this, it could save thousands in damage.
@@aspecreviews and humans shouldn't rely too much on these features
@@Nickoboss29 they don’t that’s why it’s called AEB Automatic EMERGENCY braking
@@Nickoboss29 yeah, but it’s still handy to have. People should also be aware at all times and avoid every accident, yet it doesn’t make seatbelts and airbags redundant.
Okay so I’m guessing that’s not a feature on the Tucson 😂
@@TruckEnthusiastYT they only test it if it's an advertised feature. Hyundai just can't do anything right
@@Evan2besides making nice looking infotainments
Good thing I pay attention to my surroundings. Avoided not bumping the rear end of another vehicle as we both backed out at the same time from opposite sides. Went from reverse to first gear right after stopping my 2023 Honda Civic Si. Returning back to my parking spot. So I didn't get hit from the oblivious driver who didn't have a rear view camera on his early 2000s Ford Focus.
That Subaru sounded like it farted 😂
Yeah, that's the loudest I've ever heard the ABS kick in
@@zaremol2779it also makes all sorts of abs noises during the forward auto braking
With Subaru you got to go very slow when parallel parking or the system things you are crashing.
@@oatmealtheecat8188 Makes me thankful that Honda's doesn't do that, though it still nearly slams on the breaks during the Traffic Jam Assist sometimes
the hyundai had horrible reaction times it was like OHHHH DID I HIT SOMETHING.... (5 days later) OH I DID I SHOULD STOP
Im actually surprised the Hyundai failed so miserably considering they are often praised for having the latest tech features. Guess it doesn't apply to safety necessarily lol.
The thing I notice here is that these vehicles have effectively no rear bumpers. The Honda CR-V for example took tailgate damage because there was only a inch or so of bumper to compress and take the impact of the pole before the pole was driven into the tailgate causing paint transfer and actual body panel damage.
Rear auto brake may help but maybe having bumpers that have enough crumple zone to handle these sorts slow speed impacts would be a cheaper solution or even just a passive backup in case the autobrake fails to respond.
and you can also use mirrors, parking sensors, rear view cameras, EYES and avoid this
@@dsrws7920 women don’t. That’s the problem and that’s why these features were invented 🤷♂️
I love my rear cross traffic alert but it doesn’t stop for me though. But atleast I’m alerted!
This has actually saved me a few times luckily and I would say I’m a pretty avid driver 😅
Хонда добилась успеха
2:00 when your pc can’t handle high poly traffic
I have been hit twice by drivers that reversed out of their parking spot in parking lots without looking, the first time was an ubereats driver, and he claimed that I came out of no where, I told, him, that it was him who was not paying attention while driving, he even claimed that he had a quick glance to his phone, that costed his insurance almost 10000$ in repairs for my car.
The second time was in Ottawa with a rental car, the damn driver was old and I saw him start to reverse on me, I started honking and my hand stayed at the horn while he did his whole stupid maneuver he backed out slowly and never reacted tkt he horn, he kept backing up until he lifted the car, he was thankfully going so slow, that no damage was caused, so we just agreed that there was no need for insurance claims.
This feature is very welcomed by me especially in North America where people take driving for granted
What about Nissan & Mazda & Ram or Jeep
Ram? What ram crossover
Mazda CX-5 achieved an "advanced" rating, they didn't test a Nissan Rogue but it should get the same "superior" rating as the Mitsubishi Outlander.
calm down .....
You own all of them? 😂
Ram shouldn’t have this feature. it’s a RAM! haha get it? Please laugh.
Bro that Hyundai FAILED. Who the hell gave it a Basic rating??? If those objects were real, they would have stopped the car long before it applied the brakes.
Yikes. I Was on the market for an Hyundai, this clearly has helped. I'll keep my eye on an Honda now.
Bought my wife a new Buick Envision with this feature and she loves it - Apparently Ford and Honda have the best systems according to this video though I guess.
@@Stressless2023 Awesome. That's all we want, safety for anyone.
Почти все кроссоверы очень хорошо справляются ✨
I like how they crashed the cars fr at first then proceeded to test the systems on inflatable dummies.
The Hyundai Tucson was pretty bad, I'd rather get a Honda CR-V.
@@NotSpoiler111 actually, CRV is the best of CUV
@@huyanh6782 The Ford and the Honda were the best so I guess it's between them both.
As an employee at a Hyundai dealer I can confirm that the system performs much better than shown here. It seems like they have the feature deactivated.
Hyundai failed every single tests
I think Basic just refers to a backup camera with beeping. No active braking.
It seems that the emergency braking option has not been applied.
@@UglyKoreansthe vehicle does break but only after impact
How about parking at night? how good are those systems? is there a difference in their performance?
So don’t buy Kia or Hyundai lol
why is the repair cost so high on that honda crv? i dont see any damages
Great representation of people who need these things because they are too occupied with their phones while backing up
Auto brake is a good feature I guess but my brakes slammed themselves on very hard when I was getting too close to a small bush and it scared the hell out of me…
I wonder if my Ford Copilot 360 has this feature? I do have cross-traffic rear alert, and I have the settings on high. I need to check this out.
Fun fact! There's tons of people out there who will turn these off because they claim to be better drivers than most. Yet, according to statistics and math, that's a lie, and what they really mean is that they are the worst driver on the road if the tech is bothering them.
Wheres the gmc terrain snd equinox ??
The RX 350 SLAMS on the brakes. It also depends on the sensitivity level that is set
Do these types of features work every time?
Soo basically a system to prevent
🤷♀️💅 🚗💥🚙?
Yep
Could you also test the quality of people?
i mean if you cant see a fucking car behind you even with a camera you should learn how to drive
I’ve never known that people crashing their cars is fun to watch 😅
…Hyundai…REALLY 😂
Wow I do notice a difference
後退時は歩くよりも遅いスピードにしないと、ぶつけた際に被害が大きくなる
do the new honda pilot next
Instant anxiety video.
7000 USD that!"!!!! WTF? 6000 USD labour? LMAO
Have you ever fixed a car before?
Yes. Labor is thru the roof at body shops. $100+/hr. Insanity.
@phillipvelednitskiy6881 I hit part of wall decoration with a ford ranger and broke the rear light, in less than 2 hours i bough a replacement light and replaced it for less than $150. $7000 is ridiculous, that's a good used car
all the terrible drivers drive these cars so they gon need em 😂
The Hyundai forgot it was being tested😂
Oh you meant "Big Suv's."
Yea lol, none of these vehicles are small
That will be $6 k additional to the price.
You call that "basic"?
And this is why cars are so expensive. All so people don’t have to turn their heads.
فورد كانت ناجحة .
Car asmr:
Small SUV looks like Toyota harrier 2013(Hybrid)
The absolute WORST system is Nissan’s
How? And explain why it’s the worst
@@Arandomguy375 it violently slams the brakes for no reason, too many false alerts and brakes, too sensitive
@@zero2sixty244 ok but I have been in some Sentra’s and the sensors are not that sensitive depending on the setting you have it in Nissans are a good choice of cars for me but it’s your opinion No Offense
@@Arandomguy375 I drive all the models all days. Sentras don’t typically have the braking lol
@@zero2sixty244 the Sentra’s do I have been in it when it was in action and it work perfectly fine
Harika
@02:36 - Cmon 2.3K for just a touch. This is so lame.
I thought the rav4 was gonna hit the stuff
The Toyota Rav4 did hit the objects.
The Tucson doesn’t sound good
You guys need autobrakes. Learn to drive😂😂😂
Its nearly 2025 ALL cars should have rear autobrake as standard equipment.
Tucson is very disappointing
❤❤❤❤❤
T
Basically, look where you are going. These systems shouldn’t exist. How hard is it to not back into things
is this AI? i genuinely can’t tell
?