@@YeetoLavito I recently bought a 2010 Mustang GT500 and have not had any problems with it, found a low mileage one at 39k miles so maybe thats why. Usually the engine and transmission are bullet proof, its the electronics, air conditioning, etc that might give you issues down the road.
nice video, I have this same Shelby GT500 and I love it. It's everything I've ever wanted in a muscle car. haven't had any problems with it and I got it almost new about 5 months ago and the first owner took great care of it.
The funny thing that people always talk about is how the base GT has only 315 HP but if you read the test results it usually fares quite well against other cars with more HP. As long as they are AMERICAN cars is really all that matters. Support your country and quit buying foreign trash.
I'm sure those cars are much quicker than those times posted. muscle Mustangs and fast Fords managed to get this car into the 11s high 11-second time slips with street tires
This car makes a great platform to start to build on. Evolution Performance has a 2010 GT500 that runs in the 9's. It uses a bigger supercharger and many other mods.
12.70? I ran a 12.70 in a lightly modded 2005 mustang GT at 108 mph. How did motor trend manage to eat up 10mph more with wheelspin? 11.70 seems more realistic for that trap speed.
I wish they would quit trying to drown out the sound of the S/C. Thats one of the main things that us ford guys love to hear when we get on it is the sound of that S/C screaming, knowing that we are in controll of somthing so powerful, yet so graceful at the same time.
To set the record straight, for 2010 in Canada and similarly in the US, the MRSP for a 2010 Shelby, no NAV, with HID was 59K. There were FORD dealers in Toronto Ontario clearing them mid summer of 2010 for 46K, I know I bought one. To invest 5 - 10 in mods depending on the objectives to obtain a track worthy 650 RWHP beat that can stick with machines that cost 100K is a smart buy, solid axle or IRS, case closed. The 2010 Shelby is a hot looking performance bargain.
Not sure which year, but husband of my mum's colleague has one in a town here in East Austria where she works. She said I can come over so I can ride shotgun in it :-D I'm beyond excited and can't wait because I'll do so in a couple days, as soon as I return from Vienna.
I know this is old but I couldn’t get past a minute. This guy...goodness, looks like I’m going to those Top Gear brits to learn a bit about this American car.
@artfoolman air intake only adds like 10hp. but you might as well get that, new exhaust, and a turbo. turbo doesn't do any damage to the engine, but you have to get head gaskets made for more pressure.
ryotaryuu Ford sales lead in Canada for first time in 50 years. Ford sold 27,408 vehicles in June, which was a 25-per-cent jump on sales in June, 2008, and the first year-over-year sales increase it has posted in 2009. * I cant really speak from a U.S POV but theyve been selling like crazy here lately.
@1234fllf - If you look at it as new yes. But the current M5 is out of production so finding a CPO M5 with a few miles on it ranges from $ 40K - 65K still under warranty.
Ive seen two of these in two days, god they are beautiful. the blue one at the stoplight just took off, I thought the nose was going to fly into the air
I spoke to both Ford Western Region Reps. and Shelby Motor Reps. and they bth said that there is no limited production, although Ford will cut it off at 5,000. The last 2010 production line will end in December. Also, the Shelby Rep. said that the 2011 model will probably have the glass roof option and new colors (no Grabber Blue). He also had heard about the aluminum block, but no confirmation.
It is the other way around RWD is better than all wheel drive. As long as the wheels are not slipping the AWD will be in two wheel drive, so when the wheel do slip torque is then sent to the other wheels which is why awd systems are not used in drag racing. You usually have plenty of grip when using RWD because all the weight shifts to the back of the car which in turns adds grp.
that's because of bad conditions, it should do around 4.2 with better conditions. And the trap speed is 8 mph moret than the SS camaro, which is extremely significant.
50 years ago the mustang was 5 years from production and about 3 years from initial concept... The 2009 Model year brought out the "45th Aniversary" badging... though you're right on it being an icon... it's not close to 50 yet and the original falcon chassis it was based on isn't even 50 yet. just pointing that out... mustang production was officially 1965 - now... that's only 44 years, 45 if you want to count the 1964.5's that were labeled as 1965's...
see the thing is guys everyones got there particular tastes in cars thats why i hate these videos due to people who start arguing over nothing just sit back and watch this beautiful car in action.
ford really gained my respect the past few years. besides the terminators from 04 and 03, gm was spanking fords ass in terms of performence. fords really turned it around since 2010
rumor has it that in 1967 carrol shelby himself had race car driver peter saddler drive #2 67 shelby gt-500 for a shakedown run on groom lake and used both nitrous bottles blew a head gasket off one bank of the 390ci twin 4BB. trap speed was well over 212mph. this was in a older 1967 issue of car craft magazine. you couldnt get a new mustang past 160.
I own 1998 mustang gt and i love it but when the time comes i would be getting gt500 from 2011 and up models but not the new ones because the insurance would be crazy high
thats a very nice car and i like the refinement of the styling over the previous gt500s. however, i think a low mile 03/04 john coletti terminator cobra that hasn't been abused is still a heck of a bargain in the muscle car world
What type of engine is this? I'm going to assume its a 302cu. in. anyway, I think ford should consider remaking the 428cu. in. those engines were awesome!
@wilcoxStudios18 We must then assume you are comparing the 2012 boss to the 2012 or 2011 GT500 and not the 2010 GT 500 in this video, correct? The boss is unfortunately not an easy car to buy, limited production and pricing that is higher due to dealer markup. You are correct that the boss is faster around a road course and that was against the 2011 GT500 which is quicker than the 2010 GT500. You are incorrect saying the 2010 is a disappointment, it is a performance bargain with huge potential.
Are they actually painted on or are they just bigass stickers? I work at a Ford dealer and the Shelby we've got has huge stickers for the racing stripes, it's so cheap
Your Cobra Terminator top speed, HP, and 1/4 mile are incorrect. The top speed is computer governed to 165, will do 185 with the governor removed. The 1/4 average is 12.5, the actual BHP is 430. The only thing you got correct was the 0-60 in 4.5.
I'm 19 i have a 2001 explorer sport tricked out for offroading thanks to my father. after navy boot camp i'm buying this. and there is no way in hell i'm keeping it stock. life will be even better
So you're saying that nobody but Germans should own sports cars? Because There are very few places where you can go more than 80mph on the road in the world.
@sanatatic - I've heard of it. I've had nothing but good luck with them. Even after more engine power and stress plus abuse the transmission is strong. That goes for both BMW and Porsche who use them. Almost 90% of Corvette Z06 owners and other LS motors that add power to their car use a Porsche gearbox that is flipped upside-down than a housing adapter. This is cause the stock transmission is shit weak, and the Porsche can handle LOTS of power no issue.
Well if it's a 1968 454 corvette with an upgrade cam, it's for performance. I hope you drive it like a performance car. This wasn't a "who's faster" request for a video. I genuinely like the older vettes and wanted to see and hear yours.
Love this car, but i do wish they didnt cut out as much of the superchargers whine. It really makes it sound a little mean with the whine, I will add that this is my opinion.
@JeffYaddow Agreed, the camaro is a nice cruiser, as is the Shelby and the rest of the mustang line up. Also like the looks of the camaro. However, in all categories I prefer the Ford line up of mustangs. To each his/her own, noted and respected.
This is what i caught .....The reality factor.The 2007-2009 GT500 rated @ 500 hp/480 ft-lb tq, 0-60 mph in 4.6 sec tested by Road&Track with 3.31 gearing .The 2010 GT500 rated@ 540 hp/510 ft-lb tq with 3.55 gearing 0-60 mph in 4.3 sec .The 2010 Camaro SS man trans. with 426 hp/410 lb-ft tq will not equal a GT500. GM fans are clamoring for a s/c version or LS7 Z/28 with 500+HP to be competitive.
@bessniak what kind of cars do they have there? because I know in europe they don't have quite as powerful cars as they have here because gas is so expensive there, here it's pretty cheap.
@heartlessvietboy ........My whole point is you see the engine assemblers signature right on the cam covers . I k now what it stands for and what SVO before it represented.
I'm a GM guy no doubt but i think the 2008 GT500KR is one of the badest cars ever made. I think M/T are idiots for saying that the ride is too stiff..lol. Give me a break with all that power who wants a mushy ride. For a car like this the stiff ride is the only way i would want it. As usual Carroll Shelby you are the man!!!
@kingcantu1 Shelby cobra that's who. The 5.0 was back for 2011, have a look at the 2011 shelby quarter mile times with the available 3.73's. Don't get me wrong, love the new 5.0's but the 5.4 still has an edge and remember its set up from the factory for its blower, with better tires and few inexpensive suspension tweaks its well worth the greater potential power and prestige. My 2010 shelby with a tune, 2.59 stock looking pulley, 90mm idler and better airfilter is laying down 566rwhp/564ft lb
i heard about that , it comes with a 6.2 liter engine aka hurricane . is that right ? i am sure they are bringing the 5.0 back to the gt . which it badly needs since 1993 .
Yeah that was ford's motto way back when they started. Now their motto is, quality is not doing it right when no one is looking or when they are looking.
I just bought a 2010 gt500 today... and i have to say it was everything i expected and more i love everything about it!
Michael Principale How has it been this last year? Looking at one but hear terrible reviews about the 2010.
@@YeetoLavito I recently bought a 2010 Mustang GT500 and have not had any problems with it, found a low mileage one at 39k miles so maybe thats why. Usually the engine and transmission are bullet proof, its the electronics, air conditioning, etc that might give you issues down the road.
Im gonna buy one next year, I'm gonna shoot for a 2014
@@Twobarpsi no way..
@@Twobarpsi I mean a car from 2010 with 17k miles is weird isn't
nice video, I have this same Shelby GT500 and I love it. It's everything I've ever wanted in a muscle car. haven't had any problems with it and I got it almost new about 5 months ago and the first owner took great care of it.
I still love my '10 gt500 aaaand i wish that owners of this magazine would learn how to be unbiased
The funny thing that people always talk about is how the base GT has only 315 HP but if you read the test results it usually fares quite well against other cars with more HP. As long as they are AMERICAN cars is really all that matters. Support your country and quit buying foreign trash.
My uncles F250 has lasted over 350 with no engine work at all. He is the original owner as well. Yes Ford does an amazing job!
RIP Carroll Shelby.
Hahaha this dude had no idea how to talk about this car
I am a mustang lover till the end.. the 2010 shelby is awesome.. Clean
I'm sure those cars are much quicker than those times posted. muscle Mustangs and fast Fords managed to get this car into the 11s high 11-second time slips with street tires
This is my dream car!!! My dad curently owns an 08 shelby gt500 and i love it
This car makes a great platform to start to build on.
Evolution Performance has a 2010 GT500 that runs in the 9's.
It uses a bigger supercharger and many other mods.
just watched 2013 test again for 10th time man what a difference
12.70? I ran a 12.70 in a lightly modded 2005 mustang GT at 108 mph. How did motor trend manage to eat up 10mph more with wheelspin? 11.70 seems more realistic for that trap speed.
I wish they would quit trying to drown out the sound of the S/C. Thats one of the main things that us ford guys love to hear when we get on it is the sound of that S/C screaming, knowing that we are in controll of somthing so powerful, yet so graceful at the same time.
To set the record straight, for 2010 in Canada and similarly in the US, the MRSP for a 2010 Shelby, no NAV, with HID was 59K. There were FORD dealers in Toronto Ontario clearing them mid summer of 2010 for 46K, I know I bought one. To invest 5 - 10 in mods depending on the objectives to obtain a track worthy 650 RWHP beat that can stick with machines that cost 100K is a smart buy, solid axle or IRS, case closed. The 2010 Shelby is a hot looking performance bargain.
Not sure which year, but husband of my mum's colleague has one in a town here in East Austria where she works. She said I can come over so I can ride shotgun in it :-D I'm beyond excited and can't wait because I'll do so in a couple days, as soon as I return from Vienna.
Mine is on order kona blue cant wait, this car is a major improvement over the previous one.
I know this is old but I couldn’t get past a minute. This guy...goodness, looks like I’m going to those Top Gear brits to learn a bit about this American car.
@artfoolman air intake only adds like 10hp. but you might as well get that, new exhaust, and a turbo. turbo doesn't do any damage to the engine, but you have to get head gaskets made for more pressure.
um im here in 2020 but still llove this car
Why would you resonate the supercharger wine ?! Why?
ryotaryuu
Ford sales lead in Canada for first time in 50 years.
Ford sold 27,408 vehicles in June, which was a 25-per-cent jump on sales in June, 2008, and the first year-over-year sales increase it has posted in 2009.
*
I cant really speak from a U.S POV but theyve been selling like crazy here lately.
@1234fllf - If you look at it as new yes. But the current M5 is out of production so finding a CPO M5 with a few miles on it ranges from $ 40K - 65K still under warranty.
Get a load of this guy. Doesn't even like supercharger whine.
Ive seen two of these in two days, god they are beautiful. the blue one at the stoplight just took off, I thought the nose was going to fly into the air
this is a big year for pony/muscle cars!
mustang, camaro and challenger!
i just got that issue yesterday!!that is the true number for the GT 500!!!ford all the way!!
Im not really a ford guy, but this Shelby is just AMAZING!!!
I spoke to both Ford Western Region Reps. and Shelby Motor Reps. and they bth said that there is no limited production, although Ford will cut it off at 5,000. The last 2010 production line will end in December. Also, the Shelby Rep. said that the 2011 model will probably have the glass roof option and new colors (no Grabber Blue). He also had heard about the aluminum block, but no confirmation.
Thanks for filming in Sonoma County!!!
Don't u mess with my lovely beast
i believe that they will,there will be a different powertrain for the mustang,next year,or the year after.
It is the other way around RWD is better than all wheel drive. As long as the wheels are not slipping the AWD will be in two wheel drive, so when the wheel do slip torque is then sent to the other wheels which is why awd systems are not used in drag racing. You usually have plenty of grip when using RWD because all the weight shifts to the back of the car which in turns adds grp.
that's because of bad conditions, it should do around 4.2 with better conditions. And the trap speed is 8 mph moret than the SS camaro, which is extremely significant.
50 years ago the mustang was 5 years from production and about 3 years from initial concept...
The 2009 Model year brought out the "45th Aniversary" badging... though you're right on it being an icon... it's not close to 50 yet and the original falcon chassis it was based on isn't even 50 yet.
just pointing that out... mustang production was officially 1965 - now... that's only 44 years, 45 if you want to count the 1964.5's that were labeled as 1965's...
Drove one yesterday. This car fucking rips...Borderline scary, but immensely fun.
see the thing is guys everyones got there particular tastes in cars thats why i hate these videos due to people who start arguing over nothing just sit back and watch this beautiful car in action.
It's supposed to go to 60 in under 4.2, claimed both by the factory and another magazine that tested it
ford really gained my respect the past few years. besides the terminators from 04 and 03, gm was spanking fords ass in terms of performence. fords really turned it around since 2010
The base corvette coupe starts at $49,515
The convertible starts at $54,170
The Z06 starts at $74,875
And the ZR1 starts at $104,920
Badass car Ford still continues to Dominate the Market
rumor has it that in 1967 carrol shelby himself had race car driver peter saddler drive #2 67 shelby gt-500 for a shakedown run on groom lake and used both nitrous bottles blew a head gasket off one bank of the 390ci twin 4BB.
trap speed was well over 212mph. this was in a older 1967 issue of car craft magazine.
you couldnt get a new mustang past 160.
I own 1998 mustang gt and i love it but when the time comes i would be getting gt500 from 2011 and up models but not the new ones because the insurance would be crazy high
I like how this one sounds and looks up front, but I hate the middle to the back.
thats a very nice car and i like the refinement of the styling over the previous gt500s. however, i think a low mile 03/04 john coletti terminator cobra that hasn't been abused is still a heck of a bargain in the muscle car world
its awd
just because it can take off fast doesnt mean it will beat a car with slower 0-60 in the 1/4
i dont get it. why headlights are different. the headlights exist in this video doesnt exist in the dealership. confuseddddd
@heartlessvietboy ..If you look @ the camcovers , you will see that it says POWERED BY SVT and has the signature of the engine builders .
Why in you're description does it say Camaro SS slaying GT500 when this has more HP and it faster.
When you get that shelby, video that holy grail car buddy.
Wow... just hear at that sound... just awesome...
What type of engine is this? I'm going to assume its a 302cu. in. anyway, I think ford should consider remaking the 428cu. in. those engines were awesome!
Will it blend ?
@wilcoxStudios18 We must then assume you are comparing the 2012 boss to the 2012 or 2011 GT500 and not the 2010 GT 500 in this video, correct? The boss is unfortunately not an easy car to buy, limited production and pricing that is higher due to dealer markup. You are correct that the boss is faster around a road course and that was against the 2011 GT500 which is quicker than the 2010 GT500. You are incorrect saying the 2010 is a disappointment, it is a performance bargain with huge potential.
@sanatatic - Corvettes are great. Stock. I've seen many Z06 blow their motor adding a little power but mostly the transmissions are weak
Are they actually painted on or are they just bigass stickers? I work at a Ford dealer and the Shelby we've got has huge stickers for the racing stripes, it's so cheap
Your Cobra Terminator top speed, HP, and 1/4 mile are incorrect. The top speed is computer governed to 165, will do 185 with the governor removed.
The 1/4 average is 12.5, the actual BHP is 430. The only thing you got correct was the 0-60 in 4.5.
I'm 19 i have a 2001 explorer sport tricked out for offroading thanks to my father.
after navy boot camp i'm buying this. and there is no way in hell i'm keeping it stock.
life will be even better
that is true!!the SHELBY KR is 11.9@120 in the 1/4mile
So you're saying that nobody but Germans should own sports cars? Because There are very few places where you can go more than 80mph on the road in the world.
Sounds like an old GT40 Le Mans car.
Very nice.
@sanatatic - I've heard of it. I've had nothing but good luck with them. Even after more engine power and stress plus abuse the transmission is strong. That goes for both BMW and Porsche who use them. Almost 90% of Corvette Z06 owners and other LS motors that add power to their car use a Porsche gearbox that is flipped upside-down than a housing adapter. This is cause the stock transmission is shit weak, and the Porsche can handle LOTS of power no issue.
I believe they tested the V6 Camaro and it did a 6.0 second 0-60.
Why aren't the brake discs drilled? weird for such massive brake pads / calipers
Where did you get those figures from?
I see Shelby's at dealers for about $57,000--- which is still too high.
@IPGAuto i meant brand new it cost 65k pound and mustang cost 35k pound for shelby and 45k pound for roush
Well if it's a 1968 454 corvette with an upgrade cam, it's for performance. I hope you drive it like a performance car. This wasn't a "who's faster" request for a video. I genuinely like the older vettes and wanted to see and hear yours.
@MetalRulesRapSux And the stock Mustang gt has 412hp, So I'm trying to find your point....
Love this car, but i do wish they didnt cut out as much of the superchargers whine. It really makes it sound a little mean with the whine, I will add that this is my opinion.
@JeffYaddow Agreed, the camaro is a nice cruiser, as is the Shelby and the rest of the mustang line up. Also like the looks of the camaro. However, in all categories I prefer the Ford line up of mustangs. To each his/her own, noted and respected.
No argument from me on that comment :)
I wasnt a big fan of the 2001, but Im a huge fan of the 03/04 Cobras. So much so that I own a pair.
This is what i caught .....The reality factor.The 2007-2009 GT500 rated @ 500 hp/480 ft-lb tq, 0-60 mph in 4.6 sec tested by Road&Track with 3.31 gearing .The 2010 GT500 rated@ 540 hp/510 ft-lb tq with 3.55 gearing 0-60 mph in 4.3 sec .The 2010 Camaro SS man trans. with 426 hp/410 lb-ft tq will not equal a GT500. GM fans are clamoring for a s/c version or LS7 Z/28 with 500+HP to be competitive.
@bessniak what kind of cars do they have there? because I know in europe they don't have quite as powerful cars as they have here because gas is so expensive there, here it's pretty cheap.
I don't like the fact that they altered the resonator to cut out some of the supercharger whine, I would want that to be PRESENT, it sounds so mean.
in my opinion is the 2010 Ford Shelby GT500 is the most nice 2010 car i know, cause it still looks like the old Shelby GT500 !
The Mustang will always be the king no matter what.
I love the front, hate the back. FINALLY, the Mustang gets projector headlamps!!!
Yea the ZR1 is a great car. 0-60 3.8 secs and goes 205+ MPH. It's the one of the best production cars the U.S has. But it is expensive at 100k
American muscle cars still to date have the best V8 sounds PERIOD!! Their the industry benchmark.
why would they want to cut out the supercharger whine?
the hoof beats faster than the heartbeat
Springs. They still use springs in the back?
is it hard to drive stick? Cause i'm 27 and i have had only automatic cars.
muscle mustangs & fast fords october 09,the GT500 did 111.9@120 on stock tires.that is the true times of the GT500.
@heartlessvietboy ........My whole point is you see the engine assemblers signature right on the cam covers . I k now what it stands for and what SVO before it represented.
I'm a GM guy no doubt but i think the 2008 GT500KR is one of the badest cars
ever made. I think M/T are idiots for saying that the ride is too stiff..lol. Give me a break with all that power who wants a mushy ride. For a car like this the stiff ride is the only way i would want it. As usual Carroll Shelby you are the man!!!
@Travide i do, i wanna know the ups and downs of both o i know witch to get, most people choose a certain car because of the way it looks.
looove the way it looks...beautiful
@SBCriss And we are happy that we made the right choice.
@kingcantu1 Shelby cobra that's who. The 5.0 was back for 2011, have a look at the 2011 shelby quarter mile times with the available 3.73's. Don't get me wrong, love the new 5.0's but the 5.4 still has an edge and remember its set up from the factory for its blower, with better tires and few inexpensive suspension tweaks its well worth the greater potential power and prestige. My 2010 shelby with a tune, 2.59 stock looking pulley, 90mm idler and better airfilter is laying down 566rwhp/564ft lb
how long of a life time milage would you get outa this thing (being supercharged)
it's rear wheel drive so it takes a little bit for it to get grip, if this was an all wheel drive car it would be much faster 0-60
what the name again of this raceway (Northern California)?
That's probably exactly what it was, it looks like it was a hot day at the 1/4 mile
@Mrstonester lol...so why would u get the gt500 if the cheaper 5.0 is faster and better gas mileage
@ejf2461 yeah but the car is 5800lbs compared to a vette which is 1700 pounds lighter?
i heard about that , it comes with a 6.2 liter engine aka hurricane . is that right ? i am sure they are bringing the 5.0 back to the gt . which it badly needs since 1993 .
Yeah that was ford's motto way back when they started. Now their motto is, quality is not doing it right when no one is looking or when they are looking.
I'm a GM guy..... but I want one of these. I miss T/A Firebirds!
@4632v - lmao.. where'd you get those numbers? I've never heard of any M5 to have 256hp. Please share with the rest of us.