Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259 Share this video!
Listening to Harold Pinter explain his writing process was really valuable to me. I enjoyed listening to him and hearing his take on things. Thank you for uploading this.
I just got on to the bit where Pinter starts talking politics. I love him! Even if i do not necessarily agree with him i love the stance he takes and the conviction with which he makes his argument! Thank you for this!!!
One of the most important things I ever heard was Harold Pinter's acceptance speech, "Art, Truth and Politics" for his Nobel Prize on December 7, 2005. Pinter spoke of the comfort cushion that Americans flop on whenever they need to escape something that demands attention and action.
Peter you're not listening properly. Rose isn't poking any fire. He is interrupting with useless clarifications that don't need to be made and disrupting the flow of conversation. This is egregious interviewing. Stop trying to make a flaw look like a technique.
I was at school with Harold Pinter in 1944 but sadly i cannot really remember him it was the emergency school set up before the return from Kings Lynn. I remember we used to go to our shelter quite often a basement cloakroom ,the toilet was situated by the railway arches next to the Woodwork Hut, we had to run very quick and often saw a doodle bug fly past. Sadly i never made any mark on the world , i was one of few scholarship boys from Hackney Ii went to Kings Lynn but my mother dragged me back to London where I went to Parmiters until the school reopened at Hackney Downs. I was a Gentile but unless to was a Jewish holiday it never mattered.
Still so vigorous here, it's sad to see how frail he was by 2005 and his Nobel Prize lecture - and yet we can't be sad for him ultimately since he was so creatively fulfilled.
I met this man years ago when I was 22 year old or so his wisdom was amazing 😍. He thought my writing was weak yet profundus in my spirit and honesty just as I spoke...
After Pinter quotes WH Auden, at 18:21 Charlie Rose immediately tries to match Pinter by confidently attributing another quote to WH Auden. Pinter looks and sounds a little surprised at hearing this - he evens seems to subtlety give Rose the finger. Pinter’s reaction is probably explained because Rose is actually quoting William Faulkner.
Yeah, Charlie was really frustrating to watch. On the other hand, nobody else on TV was interviewing Harold Pinter or a lot of the other people Charlie had on, so it was a trade-off.
Charlie Rose had it easy. If you compare this to one of the few public interviews he did in the 60s and 70s, in this case with Melvin Bragg you'll see what a golden opportunity Rose has here. Pinter chatters away about light but mostly weighty matters. Had never been thus. Still, Pinter probably always needed drawing out so this blunderbuss style of Rose worked.
Having said that, and having just seen the later part about intervention in the Balkans, I see that this interviewer reveals himself to be a first class prat. Embarrassing.
Charlie Rose could be so annoying and intrusive an interviewer. He obviously has an agenda, and strains mightily not to disclose it. There's something dishonest about him.
Extremely interesting conversation with Harold Pinter. He is left to express all his wisdom and charm when he talks about the Theatre in the first part, while he is not left to finish his sentences in the second part, when he denounces the violence and arrogance of the United States foreign politics. There the interviewer’s interruptions become unbearable. Luckily, Pinter doesn’t lose his temper and firmly, clearly, using the best words the English language possesses, defines the US’ violations of International Laws and Human Rights and why. And the interviewer interrupts again, laughing and bringing superficial, pop arguments. Nothing has changed. Thank you, Mr. Pinter. We still need your words, very much ✨✨✨
Pinter wasn't a pacifist. He stood trial twice for Conscientious Objection, during which he clearly stated he would have fought the Nazis, had he been of age.
Rose is such a distraaction, yet he asks good, even extremely good questions. As time goes on he suddenyy knows more than his guests. Explore, kicks stones and see what is under them Charlie. And let your guessts speak.
@@TheSefrew No, you're responsible for your own ignorance. You're making an assertion and I'm asking you to explain yourself. I'm not googling what is an obvious joke.
It's impossible to finish watching that bullying creep Rose constantly interrupt Harold Pinter out of jealousy and competition for who knows the most. Pinter should have just stood up, halfway through, and walked out.
Only a straight man would ask such a dumb question because they don't see sexiness in men. It's because Harold is sexually attractive. A better question would be how did she get him? She's utterly obnoxious.
Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect
Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259
Share this video!
My God Harold is so patient with both the slimy flattery and dreadful hypocrisy which oozes out of Rose.
You could not be more precise. Rose has always been a SYCOPHANT FOR IMPERIALISM. The man makes me sick.
Saw my first Pinter play last week the caretaker and was mesmerized. Brilliant thought provoking
Listening to Harold Pinter explain his writing process was really valuable to me. I enjoyed listening to him and hearing his take on things. Thank you for uploading this.
I just got on to the bit where Pinter starts talking politics. I love him! Even if i do not necessarily agree with him i love the stance he takes and the conviction with which he makes his argument! Thank you for this!!!
One of the most important things I ever heard was Harold Pinter's acceptance speech, "Art, Truth and Politics" for his Nobel Prize on December 7, 2005. Pinter spoke of the comfort cushion that Americans flop on whenever they need to escape something that demands attention and action.
@Noe Berenga, Hear! HEAR!!!
*As is the case* with Canadians and the other *European-colonised societies' politicians and populations* as well.
The condition of light he talks about.
If only someone would tell the interviewer that "less is more?!" Damn.
Perhaps that 'Someone' could have told Pinter the same?
yes it is and its irritating but thats his job to poke the fire like frost on nixon, it either activates something or quells something
Peter you're not listening properly. Rose isn't poking any fire. He is interrupting with useless clarifications that don't need to be made and disrupting the flow of conversation. This is egregious interviewing. Stop trying to make a flaw look like a technique.
"Who the Hell do we think we are?" Amen.
Yes. Us Canadians were condescended to by the Yanks and the Brits for decades.
Slimey rose. Thank you Harold Pinter once again. You were one in a million.
I always got a cringey vibe off Charlie, before we even knew what a creep he was.
Creepy is the word 👍
I was at school with Harold Pinter in 1944 but sadly i cannot really remember him it was the emergency school set up before the return from Kings Lynn.
I remember we used to go to our shelter quite often a basement cloakroom ,the toilet was situated by the railway arches next to the Woodwork Hut, we had to run very quick and often saw a doodle bug fly past.
Sadly i never made any mark on the world , i was one of few scholarship boys from Hackney Ii went to Kings Lynn but my mother dragged me back to London where I went to Parmiters until the school reopened at Hackney Downs.
I was a Gentile but unless to was a Jewish holiday it never mattered.
Still so vigorous here, it's sad to see how frail he was by 2005 and his Nobel Prize lecture - and yet we can't be sad for him ultimately since he was so creatively fulfilled.
He would be diagnosed with cancer shortly after this interview. But indeed, here he looks great - what a charming smile he had.
Yes, very strong and dynamic. A real contrast to the creepy placid Rose.
I met this man years ago when I was 22 year old or so his wisdom was amazing 😍. He thought my writing was weak yet profundus in my spirit and honesty just as I spoke...
Charlie can barely hide his admiration for the man
If he respected him he would know when to shut up. It's an interview not a conversation.
Very relevant point on Chile and the use of false equivalence.
After Pinter quotes WH Auden, at 18:21 Charlie Rose immediately tries to match Pinter by confidently attributing another quote to WH Auden. Pinter looks and sounds a little surprised at hearing this - he evens seems to subtlety give Rose the finger. Pinter’s reaction is probably explained because Rose is actually quoting William Faulkner.
Wasn't that Flannery O'Connor actually?
@@indydude3367 Good catch
@@indydude3367 E. M. Forster
And the finger is stabbing his face all through the interview. Just a pretentious mannerism. Like lifting the pinkie when sipping the tea.
wonderful plays at times I do not understand them! I have to watch them over and over
I have watched a few of his plays translated into film and they are both entertaining and understandable celebrating individuality.
Should write a play about that interviewer. Probably already did.
I'm an ambitious writer myself but I know I'll never be as good as Pinter. We can be influenced but ultimately need to find our own style.
I love you Harold Pinter!♥️♥️
Charlie, shut up & let him talk...
Yeah, Charlie was really frustrating to watch. On the other hand, nobody else on TV was interviewing Harold Pinter or a lot of the other people Charlie had on, so it was a trade-off.
I know... I know... I know
Charlie Rose had it easy. If you compare this to one of the few public interviews he did in the 60s and 70s, in this case with Melvin Bragg you'll see what a golden opportunity Rose has here. Pinter chatters away about light but mostly weighty matters. Had never been thus.
Still, Pinter probably always needed drawing out so this blunderbuss style of Rose worked.
Having said that, and having just seen the later part about intervention in the Balkans, I see that this interviewer reveals himself to be a first class prat. Embarrassing.
yes, unbearable really.
Charlie Rose could be so annoying and intrusive an interviewer. He obviously has an agenda, and strains mightily not to disclose it. There's something dishonest about him.
Extremely interesting conversation with Harold Pinter. He is left to express all his wisdom and charm when he talks about the Theatre in the first part, while he is not left to finish his sentences in the second part, when he denounces the violence and arrogance of the United States foreign politics. There the interviewer’s interruptions become unbearable. Luckily, Pinter doesn’t lose his temper and firmly, clearly, using the best words the English language possesses, defines the US’ violations of International Laws and Human Rights and why. And the interviewer interrupts again, laughing and bringing superficial, pop arguments. Nothing has changed. Thank you, Mr. Pinter. We still need your words, very much ✨✨✨
The self-important Charlie Rose, under the mistaken belief that it is all about him, yet again.
Haha
Appalling interview here by Rose. Pinter is a genius
Good lord, what Rose did after 27:30 was just embarrassing, trying to simplify heavily the point of Pinter.
he's horrible. I don't like him.
Don't worry about that nasty man. Now give me your hand.
Can someone repost this interview with the Charlie Rose bits taken out?
Lol 😂👍
You can analyze his plays as much as you want, they defy description. You can't teach his style of writing.
Mr Shakespeare are you sorry you have spent your life writing and not acting?
Charlie Rose
I dislike Charlie Rose so much as an interviewer and a personality that every interview he does is ruined for me
I totally love Pinter. Unfortunately this interview shows that pacifism is ultimately a losing argument.
Pinter wasn't a pacifist. He stood trial twice for Conscientious Objection, during which he clearly stated he would have fought the Nazis, had he been of age.
I can't stand that interviewer, he's so overpowering and jabedi-jabedi-jab!
Rose is such a quintessential American, my god.
Lol as an American, I have to agree. With embarrassment
Rose is such a distraaction, yet he asks good, even extremely good questions. As time goes on he suddenyy knows more than his guests. Explore, kicks stones and see what is under them Charlie. And let your guessts speak.
Charlie Rose crossed the line in this interview.
He did and it’s vile… why have Pinter on?
"I WAS A POET AT 12"
God at least get the titles right, particularly after Pinter's corrected you. Betrayal, not The Betrayal.
The only person who beat him on his interview were Manson, he was gabering in the end!
Nieve questions form American tv presenter Rose, has made Pinter very uneasy to be misrepresented.
How funny to see art makers praising war makers(who are also funders of art makers) in the name of human rights!
Explain how war makers are funders of art please. Stop being stupid.
@@ellie-tk4jy Research idiot!I am not responsible for your ignorance!
@@TheSefrew No, you're responsible for your own ignorance. You're making an assertion and I'm asking you to explain yourself. I'm not googling what is an obvious joke.
@@ellie-tk4jy Hahaha! I have no obligation to explain myself to an ignorant human like being like you!
Oh my God how did dear mr pinter control his temper he must got the nerve, no one can stand this interviewer I wish he shut up more
It's impossible to finish watching that bullying creep Rose constantly interrupt Harold Pinter out of jealousy and competition for who knows the most. Pinter should have just stood up, halfway through, and walked out.
19.52 - who's challenging the bullshitters now?
Was this before or after the 9/11 attacks ?
donno but
they would have spoken about it, right?
Right, but the year is 2001 and the interview took place in New York so i thought it was an appropriate question to ask , don't you think ?
Yes but I'm arguing that had the interview been after 9/11 they would have mentioned it. So I guess it is prior to the tragedy.
This interview was conducted 7/19/2001.
The Harold Pinter theatre
It's not about that drama, right?
Rose doesn't seem on the same wavelength for much of the time. Comes across as a bit desperate.
And this is before 9/11 and the detentions at Guantanamo Bay
Yes, because the majority of Iraqi's, Shiite and Kurd, aren't grateful that the bast*rd Hussein is gone. Talk about missing the forest for the trees.
It wouldn't have been much of a sex change for Quentin crisp😅
how did he get joan bakewell
4 bottles of a good Merlot, then he revealed his 'Mighty Mallet'...Huge, apparently.
By being a genius?
Only a straight man would ask such a dumb question because they don't see sexiness in men. It's because Harold is sexually attractive. A better question would be how did she get him? She's utterly obnoxious.
Women like smart men. Marilyn Monroe/Arthur Miller. Also funny men, for those that are confused at how Pete Davidson gets beautiful women.
Pinterview
Is it me or does Pinter seem hung over?
Pinter was a fossilized anti-American git. It has always amazed me how some individuals talent is warped by their self righteous politics.
Was he anti-American? I know he was highly critical of US foreign policy, but so is Ron Paul.
To be indignant and scathing is self-righteous?
Those baggy eyes and restless hands screaming for ciggarettes. Where smoking probhibitted on stage?
Is this kultur? Where's the sick bucket.
Frustrating interview, had good potential
Somehow 9/11 in a few months was passed off with a wha.. th.. fu..
interviewer does not let him talk lol
Rose sounds like a buffoon during the ‘political’ part of this interview.
I would've watched this interview...but,...I can't stand this irritating interviewer
Terrible interviewer!
God Rose is insufferable.
INTERVIEWERS SHOULDNT HAVE ANY VIEWS
wonderful plays at times I do not understand them! I have to watch them over and over