Rate Determining Step and Reaction Mechanisms 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 78

  • @HemZi123
    @HemZi123 9 років тому +91

    Thanks alot sir, I'd give you the nobel prize if I had one.

    • @sarahkekeli
      @sarahkekeli 3 роки тому +1

      Hello

    • @HemZi123
      @HemZi123 3 роки тому +1

      @@sarahkekeli hi

    • @sarahkekeli
      @sarahkekeli 3 роки тому +1

      @@HemZi123 any questions (examples) aside the ones he thought?
      Even a video

    • @HemZi123
      @HemZi123 3 роки тому +1

      @@sarahkekeli sorry i can't even remember how to do these its been a long time

    • @HemZi123
      @HemZi123 3 роки тому +1

      @@JC-ij4kf almost finished :)

  • @shazkhan5392
    @shazkhan5392 8 років тому +37

    Couldn't be more clear. Awesome clarity in your explanations. Thanks a lot.

  • @binlo9959
    @binlo9959 9 років тому +31

    Wow, I've struggled with this all year but you've explained it so well that I've got it, thank you so much!

  • @reizelangela
    @reizelangela 9 років тому +32

    thank youu!! please keep making videos! you're saving my dumb ass haha

    • @zannatul23
      @zannatul23 8 років тому +2

      +Reizel Quiachon trust

  • @cloudqbaby3101
    @cloudqbaby3101 Рік тому

    here in 2023, and thank you so much i swear you're a lifesaver

  • @ummewaseem5983
    @ummewaseem5983 8 років тому +2

    Would this be correct?NO2+NO2->NO+NO+O2 O2+CO+NO->CO2+NO2 overall: NO2+CO->CO2+NO

  • @dobbythe1st
    @dobbythe1st 9 років тому +4

    thank you for these videos! would this be correct?
    RDS- NO + NO ==> N2 + O2
    OTHER - N2 + 2O2 ==> 2NO2
    ?

    • @JimJam-ju6vn
      @JimJam-ju6vn 2 роки тому

      i got that, i wonder if it was correct

  • @manalcheema8075
    @manalcheema8075 5 років тому +3

    This video is a gem thank you

    • @MaChemGuy
      @MaChemGuy  5 років тому +1

      Very kind of you to say so :)

  • @Charlotte-hf5jz
    @Charlotte-hf5jz 9 місяців тому

    in my answer, do i cancel out too or do i have to leave them in for the examiner?

  • @cutieepie757
    @cutieepie757 7 років тому +2

    wow excellent video

  • @omgoswamy9762
    @omgoswamy9762 4 роки тому

    Fantastic clarity

  • @harveylloyd-williams3382
    @harveylloyd-williams3382 4 роки тому +2

    you are a legend... 2020

    • @MaChemGuy
      @MaChemGuy  4 роки тому +1

      Harvey Lloyd-Williams I’ll take that. Thanks, very kind.

  • @flowerpower487
    @flowerpower487 9 років тому +4

    MaChemGuy
    Sir please respond, can I have 1/2 N2 instead of just N?
    Thank you for doing these videos.

    • @thejibbos
      @thejibbos 9 років тому +1

      Yes, it's the same thing. Good luck for tomorrow.

    • @flowerpower487
      @flowerpower487 9 років тому +2

      thejibbos
      Thanks brah, same to you of course, and thanks for clearing it up. :)
      btw MaChemGuy is a king for doing this!

    • @thejibbos
      @thejibbos 9 років тому +1

      Yeah he is the true MVP. How did you find the exam?

    • @flowerpower487
      @flowerpower487 9 років тому +1

      thejibbos
      Easier paper than normal imo.
      Got one exam left. wabu?

    • @thejibbos
      @thejibbos 9 років тому +1

      I finished yesterday with f215. I thought this exam was 'easy' but it did have a lot of tricks in it.

  • @alichopping2703
    @alichopping2703 8 років тому +1

    Ok, so I've got r = k[NO2]^2, and the net equation is: 3NO2+O2 --> N2 + NO + 3.5O2.
    "Propose a mechanism for this reaction"
    Finding this example really hard, any chance you could shed some light on it?

    • @MaChemGuy
      @MaChemGuy  8 років тому +1

      See my Twitter page. Two followers have answered it for you

    • @Wallow28
      @Wallow28 8 років тому +1

      +MaChemGuy
      This is my go as I don't have twitter.
      NO2 + NO2 > NO3 + NO
      NO3 + 2O2 > 0.5N2 + 3.5O2
      0.5N2 + NO2 > N2 + O2
      Cancelling out gives the overall equation of
      3NO2 + O2 > N2 + 3.5O2 + NO
      Out of interest, how difficult would you say this question is compared to the average past paper question of its kind?

  • @sujata8957
    @sujata8957 3 роки тому

    All makes sense now, you are the best!

  • @nickeshaburke9836
    @nickeshaburke9836 7 років тому +3

    thanks a million, really helpful!!!!!!

  • @nidhi_prem
    @nidhi_prem 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks

  • @RuhabDabeer
    @RuhabDabeer 5 років тому +1

    I don't what is a rate determining step and how to figure it out

  • @omgoswamy9762
    @omgoswamy9762 4 роки тому +1

    You make hard concepts easy

  • @itsConnor28
    @itsConnor28 8 років тому +8

    for the last why cant i have 2NO --> N2 + O2 & 2O2 + N2 --> 2NO2 ?

  • @a.a1061
    @a.a1061 10 місяців тому

    thank you so much

  • @tahahussain5439
    @tahahussain5439 4 роки тому

    sorry, just got a question in the first question example you said that the numbers present behind the reactant determine there order in the rate=k() however in the example of no2 you wrote second order whereas in the overall equation it is 1? can you please explain this to me? any one can answer!!!!! thanks

    • @MaChemGuy
      @MaChemGuy  4 роки тому

      The order tells you the number of molecules involved in the RDS not the overall reaction equation.

    • @tahahussain5439
      @tahahussain5439 4 роки тому

      @@MaChemGuy cool thank you very much and I love you videos sir keep up with the good work

  • @ivanbliminse4325
    @ivanbliminse4325 7 років тому

    Thanks. Great video

  • @theosims-woodhouse2446
    @theosims-woodhouse2446 3 роки тому

    Would it be fine to write the N in the last mechanism as 1/2N_2?

  • @alevelsdemystified3410
    @alevelsdemystified3410 7 років тому

    Awesome video.

  • @zannatul23
    @zannatul23 8 років тому

    which method is better?

  • @akifrahman
    @akifrahman 5 років тому

    for the RDS for the 1st one, cant you have NO2+NO2---> N204 instead of NO + NO3?

    • @MaChemGuy
      @MaChemGuy  5 років тому +1

      JitteryRobin990 Yes as long as you cancel it in step 2

    • @akifrahman
      @akifrahman 5 років тому

      @@MaChemGuy Thank you sir.

  • @hxvoc_7708
    @hxvoc_7708 8 місяців тому

    can you write 2NO2 instead of two separate NO2

    • @MaChemGuy
      @MaChemGuy  8 місяців тому

      That’s fine 👍

  • @rhenaldiwijaya7778
    @rhenaldiwijaya7778 4 роки тому

    Why cant the rate determining step be just 2NO2 rather than NO2 + NO2

  • @chaabansa712
    @chaabansa712 6 років тому

    Thanks boss man

  • @Fienemien99
    @Fienemien99 8 років тому +1

    How do you know what the RDS is?

    • @MaChemGuy
      @MaChemGuy  8 років тому +2

      It's the slowest step and contains the chemicals that appear in the rate equation (nb if order 2 there will be 2 moles of them etc)

    • @Fienemien99
      @Fienemien99 8 років тому +1

      I realised that, but what if the rate isn't given? Than how can you tell which concentration (of which molecule) determines the speed of the reaction? Or is the rate always given?

    • @MaChemGuy
      @MaChemGuy  8 років тому +1

      +Josefien Berg Never seen that before at A level

    • @Blaze-ls3zw
      @Blaze-ls3zw 8 років тому +2

      Josefien Berg I'm pretty sure the rate has to be given in a question, because rate can only be worked out through experimental data. It can't just be worked out theoretically. So you'll always have some rate measurements to start with, and then from that you can work out order, rate equation and etc...

  • @pirlogarcia7091
    @pirlogarcia7091 5 років тому

    how come in the rate equations vid you said the coefficient isn't determined by the order but here it is

    • @MaChemGuy
      @MaChemGuy  5 років тому +1

      pirlo garcia You’re mixing up the overall equation with the rate determining step equation.

  • @thomashe529
    @thomashe529 5 років тому +2

    Who's watching in 2019

  • @zahramalik7364
    @zahramalik7364 5 років тому

    bless u

  • @khalidsamer2991
    @khalidsamer2991 3 роки тому

    bro can you come to his