Just got the 40 mm Ball Marvelight M Blue dial. Very Comfortable, bracelet tapers nicely- looks great too. Bruce fails to mention the 80 hr power reserve and the slightly domed sapphire crystal that finishes this watch beautifully. I don't think I have wound this watch since I got it a few weeks ago, and I don't wear it everyday... It's a very good choice...
Came from Rolexes to Breitling and haven’t looked back. Have not had Tudor or Omega, but I do agree with you that Rolex, Omega and Breitling are the 3 brands most people recognize. The quality of Breitling has kept me with that brand. Even if Rolex pricing wasn’t inflated I would still stick with Breitling.
You made a good choice. Indeed Breitling maintains a very high standard of quality. You can tell their QC is truly stringent. Even their sapphire crystal and AR coating are second to none. Hold the watch, you know it oozes quality. To top it off, the movements are calibrated to extreme accuracy, whether the modified ETA or in-house movement. On this note, their in-house B01 movement is really a gem.
To that last question I want to add the Tag Heuer Aquaracer as I feel Tag completes the 4 known brands with what you mentioned and it is lower on the budget if the intention is to use it as a daily wear to avoid scratching up his other 2 watches.
@@Starstreak170 , this is very true. Most watch people I think do not like them as much because out of the 4 they are considered the more entry level, but brand wise they are pretty well know as luxury to those that are not watch people. And my personal opinion I like their modern watches.
The thing with Breitling is always mentioned..the ETA´s inside (lower end Breitlings..), well....those wont cost an arm and a leg to service and almost any watchmaker around the world can service it. The Tudor is not really a Rolex, but damn close related and made from the same steel etc., and yes, it brings up some old history from their archives, but..., but fact is, people buy it because they wanna have something as close to the real deal, the Rolex that is. Go for the Breitling, it wont let you down, and..it is not standing in the shadow of something else, that brand has history and all the rest to back it up. is it a downgrade from your other watches, the Breitling, yup, but hey..the movement inside is a bad ass beater and the watch, is ment for being used, hard every day..so enjoy it Ryan.
Man tough match up between the Ball and the Tudor! Bruce makes a good point with the pricing of the Ball though. If you don't NEED the latest model, you can find previous models for well under $2K. While Tudor may get you more brand recognition from non watch people, that's exactly why I'd pick the Ball. Somethings to consider is that the Tudor should wear slimmer at ~11ish mm while the Ball is around 13mm (super tall tritium tubes) and to me, I feel the Tudor has more of a rugged field aesthetic while the Ball leans closer on the dressy side.
I love my first gen 2500 Planet Ocean 42mm, black dial/black bezel and white numerals, I know I'm biased but I feel it sometimes gets overlooked in the Omega diver lineup, to me it's the best looking modern Omega diver, I bought mine in 2010 and I've come to appreciate the look and dimensions even more over the years as the newer iterations have been released, I think the design was ahead of the curve when it comes to the classic aesthetic with a modern build quality, it's a keeper that I enjoy every time I put it on wrist.
Get the Breitling. I would recommend the bracelet. Breitling bracelets are sublime and something worth experiencing. Also, the market is over saturated so you can get serious discounts.
I had to make the exact same choices. In the end I went for the Tudor black bay steel. But it took me ages to decide! I looked at the breitling, the ball marvelite. And I may have been swayed by the longines big eye but I wanted a steel bracelet. Oh and I looked at the tag Heuer aquaracer, which I think is actually the best looking one. I do not regret buying the Tudor as it keeps fantastic time 2.5 seconds per day and feels as solid as a rock. Has the best resale value by miles as well. Many thanks Bruce for taking the time to do the video. It's a choice a lot of people have to make.
Agree absolutely what you say here Bruce . The age old problem with the tudor bb41 is the thickness . Although it is not ridiculous but no question it affects wearability. If it was your only watch you would become accustomed to it but when in rotation it’s always noticeable, my gmt will go out at some point due to this .. They really have to address the thickness, they have altered the movement for the 58 now they have to follow suit with the 41..
If you are lucky, you can even get them new for a bit above half the MSRP ;) I am just waiting for my Roadmaster pilot GMT, which I bought for 1700 € (MSRP is around 3000€ where I live). But granted, the storeowner made a mistake there.
I love the way you go through your thinking as discuss each one of these watches. It is very helpful as I think about my next purchase. - Thank you Bruce 😊👍
Bruce I haven’t shaved in 5 weeks and now I can’t tell if I have a pimple or just a lump of tangled hair. Have you had this problem? Asking someone with experience of facial hair growth beyond a few days. K, Thanks. Big fan of the channel.
Personally I cant get over the feeling that Tudor sold out to loyal customers. Their marketing direction and Ambassador choices just leaves little to desire. Ball has also stepped up the ladder and has done a tremendous job with their new movements. I personally would choose Ball over Tudor all day. Just my two cents.
I would absolutely take the 2017 Seamaster - I think that is the pinnacle of Seamaster styling . Tudor BB 36 is a sweet buy ! For the third guy - why not go off menu and get the BB Blue 79220B and the eta on bracelet .
I currently own the considered Omega Seamaster 300 SMPc Midsize (36.25) in black and previously owned the Tudor 1926 (36mm) and I have a 6.5” wrist. In my opinion: Tudor Black Bay 58 is internet hype. In person it’s not that great and faux patina will get old (no pun intended) sooner than later. The case wears huge as well (I admittedly like smaller watches). There’s a reason why Seamasters are regarded in the manner in which they are. The finishing, design and brushing/polish even when on my Nato is beyond impressive (from the lugs to the crown), and durable as can be (even details like having crown guards compared to none on the Tudor). The movement is awesome, I’m tracking +1.2sec a day (last test), and it’s very comfortable. The dial is awesome and the double AR coating makes the sapphire glass seem nonexistent. It’s not the perfect watch though - bracelet has no micro adjustments and when on bracelet it can feel heavy due to the construction of it. Actually that’s my only con, and you can purchase the adjustable clasp. Tudor 1926 was ‘OKAY’ at best. The bracelet fits poorly on my 6.5” wrist and the watch itself didn’t wear that well on leather strap either. The dial was pretty boring in person and the date window threw everything off. Tudor cases aren’t very comfortable to me and the 1926 styling didn’t help make up for it.
With regard to the first question, Omega. I like the Seamaster primarily for its flexibility. For me, it can be worn for any occasion. In my opinion, value is perceived. Rather than buying models like everyone else, I go more for uniqueness and what I like. That is why I would go for Ball. Breitling vs. Tudor, here I would jump on the Breitling. I also go for rugged tool watches and this Breitling would be my perfect beater.
Simon, to piggyback on what Bruce mentioned, i agree but maybe also consider what you want aesthetically out of this first luxury piece. The Tudor is great although it carrys a different look, a bit more reserved. If thats your jam than case closed but if you think that in the long run you’d want to have a bit of a flashier piece than maybe the seamaster is the one. Anyhow, just another aspect to consider. Good luck Simon and ENJOY the process!
Hard to argue, if you’re actually going to use it as a diver. But how many people do? If the gentleman is looking for a real diver at (or below) that price point, it’s Sinn U1 all day. Bruce, do you still have yours?
Just bought the new and improved Seiko Marine Master 300 from a domestic AD for $2,300. Would love to have a smaller wrist and a Tudor or Brietling as a beater.
I would do: 1 BB58 2. Sinn a lot of choices I would do a 556i or 104 on bracelet 3. Breitling - Just make sure if you buy new get a HUGE discount they seem to loose a lot of value.
To the guys wanting to spend 2000 to 3000. Take a look at Lavrenture. High end swiss micro brand but oh man is the finishing of the case so amazing. Its a incredibly comfortable watch.
For the 6.5" wrist, *definitely* the BB58 - the flat dial Omega is nice, but too big for my 6.75" wrist - forget about the 42mm SM300 completely. My BB58 and 40mm Monta Oceanking are on my wrist by far the most of all my pieces.
I own both Tudor and Ball, I agree with you Bruce on being able to get Ball watches on a discount and Tudor being able to hold its value, however I would have to say that Ball might be the better buy because you can buy it at a discount, it’s an outstanding buy if you don’t plan on flipping it. With that said if you’re buying the Ball at the same price as the Tudor then you’re correct I’d go with Tudor , not because Ball isn’t on par with Tudor but because Tudor retains its value... Both pieces are outstanding so it all depends on the deal one gets
I’ve got a Breitling Superocean Heritage, Tudor black bay GMT & a Rolex Datejust 41mm.. I’ve fallen out of love with my Tudor, my breitling is beautiful but it’s a 46mm. And the Rolex, well I wanna upgrade to the GMT Master II.. So I’ll get that in the afterlife!
Number 1 - have to agree with Bruce and say the black bay 58, Number 2 definitely the Tudor, the Ball will lose nearly $1000 instantly ( I like Ball but just being honest ). As for alternatives Bruce hit the nail on the head with the Longines, I have it and love it. Number 3. The Tudor is the better buy, I would consider the Seiko Marinemaster as an alternative. The Breitling is a nice watch and is great for variety as it is a strap monster. Another alternative would be one of Sinn’s U series divers or their EZM series. Good luck lads and Nice video Bruce
Female viewers here. Please , do a video on 32mm to 36mm size on divers, aviators, chronograph etc . On the luxury side Tudor, Omega, Longines, Zenith etc. thank you
I’m looking at purchasing a Ball but on the used market where it has taken a $$$ hit. A Ball at around $1000 is a bargain and this just doesn’t happen with Tudor . Your taste in watches are basically the same as mine.
The Breitling dial isn’t as well finished but it has a slimmer case. I’d agree with Bruce to buy one to beat up and of the two I’d go Tudor unless you change colour way and get the orange Breitling.
Maybe better to buy a Sinn as a beatup watch, wearing my 157 ST TY at work as a Mechanic for industrial tobacco machinery since 30 + years, for everything else I use a Breitling Chronomat Crosswind 2 tone and for sundays I normaly wear a Navitimer, have several. Or one of my Zenith el Primero when there are other collectors around ...
If it’s an every day Watch you’re looking for why step down when you can step across. Get yourself a preowned Carl F Bucherer Patravi ScubaTec . 1950.1in-house finished ETA 2824-2 movement , certified Chronometer, 500 m dive rating drop dead looks that P all over the Breitling and isn’t trying to be similar to an older brother like the Tudor. It’s a genuine understated classic punching above its weight. Now is the era to break away from what the crowd is doing.Just my opinion still as I’m sticking the money away to get a rose gold and steel version. There’s a lot more worthy contenders out there in other brands some with in-house movements for the three grand you’ve got to spend. Maybe even sit tight for a little bit and see if you can move up a notch without spending much more money than you’ve got to hand. Good luck.
Omega: Seamaster Diver, Seamaster 300, Aqua Terra, Speedmaster Tudor: Black Bay 58, Pelagos, Black Bay GMT, Black Bay 36 Ball: Budget options Breitling really doesn't compete here.
1: Omega Seamaster vs. Tudor Black Bay: My choise is the Seamaster. Dont like the Dolphin Hourhand on the that Tudor. Overrated and so ugly. 2. Ball Engineer M Mavellight vs. Tudor BB 41: My choise is the Ball. I own one. So much better technically and it looks fantastic. The BB 41 is inferior in every way. And i don't give a s**t about the secondary market. I buy a watch because Im like it!!! 3. Tudor BB vs. Breitling Superocean: My choise is the Breitling: I like the style of that watch. Had one before. With Tudor same as before. Such an ugly hourhand. I always think something is wrong with that watch.... and that Longines Chrono is also quite nice.
what I think you are trying to say here is brand value is a huge factor. As a watch fanatic. you have to maintain value so that when you wanna trade out you get most of your money back. losing value keeps you from buying more watches later. I personally want a ball skindiver 2, but I aint paying full value, but if I buy it right its still a good move for me. I can enjoy it and if I want something else, if bought right I can get most of my money back.
Ryan: 1st question. Why? You have a Rolex and Omega for your divers. Obviously you like your divers and now want another. But, hey! You can get a diver and have a chronograph to boot. Talking Tudor Black Bay Chronograph. Great Pre-owned, or Gray market is about in your price range.
In regards to Tudor and Omega comparison. Bad advice. If Tudor didn’t have a 3rd degree connection to Rolex, nobody would care about them. They lean on celebrity endorsements for clout. Never ever everrrrrrrr would I choose a Tudor over an Omega. Not ever.
Not at all. You need to look objectively on a model by model basis. Having owned multiple from each brand it definitely is a model by model basis for superiority
Owned a Ball for about a year and a half. Since April 1 , 14 days ago, it has gained about 13 seconds. Wonderful watch.
Just got the 40 mm Ball Marvelight M Blue dial. Very Comfortable, bracelet tapers nicely- looks great too. Bruce fails to mention the 80 hr power reserve and the slightly domed sapphire crystal that finishes this watch beautifully. I don't think I have wound this watch since I got it a few weeks ago, and I don't wear it everyday... It's a very good choice...
My personal opinion:
1 Omega
2 Tudor
3 Seiko marinemaster
😉
Came from Rolexes to Breitling and haven’t looked back. Have not had Tudor or Omega, but I do agree with you that Rolex, Omega and Breitling are the 3 brands most people recognize. The quality of Breitling has kept me with that brand. Even if Rolex pricing wasn’t inflated I would still stick with Breitling.
You made a good choice. Indeed Breitling maintains a very high standard of quality. You can tell their QC is truly stringent. Even their sapphire crystal and AR coating are second to none. Hold the watch, you know it oozes quality. To top it off, the movements are calibrated to extreme accuracy, whether the modified ETA or in-house movement. On this note, their in-house B01 movement is really a gem.
Thanks for the video Bruce! I’ve decided to go with the Breitling. Thanks for the insight into the two watches I asked about.
Omega Seamaster is an amazing watch
To that last question I want to add the Tag Heuer Aquaracer as I feel Tag completes the 4 known brands with what you mentioned and it is lower on the budget if the intention is to use it as a daily wear to avoid scratching up his other 2 watches.
Yeah, most everyday people have heard of TAG Heuer. Love or hate them, TAG know how to market.
@@Starstreak170 , this is very true. Most watch people I think do not like them as much because out of the 4 they are considered the more entry level, but brand wise they are pretty well know as luxury to those that are not watch people. And my personal opinion I like their modern watches.
The thing with Breitling is always mentioned..the ETA´s inside (lower end Breitlings..), well....those wont cost an arm and a leg to service and almost any watchmaker around the world can service it. The Tudor is not really a Rolex, but damn close related and made from the same steel etc., and yes, it brings up some old history from their archives, but..., but fact is, people buy it because they wanna have something as close to the real deal, the Rolex that is. Go for the Breitling, it wont let you down, and..it is not standing in the shadow of something else, that brand has history and all the rest to back it up. is it a downgrade from your other watches, the Breitling, yup, but hey..the movement inside is a bad ass beater and the watch, is ment for being used, hard every day..so enjoy it Ryan.
Couldn't agree more, and for current market price they really are unbeatable.
@@michaelriera6277 Thx, and yes, they are priced really good these days, i say that makes them even more good bang per buck.
Man tough match up between the Ball and the Tudor! Bruce makes a good point with the pricing of the Ball though. If you don't NEED the latest model, you can find previous models for well under $2K. While Tudor may get you more brand recognition from non watch people, that's exactly why I'd pick the Ball.
Somethings to consider is that the Tudor should wear slimmer at ~11ish mm while the Ball is around 13mm (super tall tritium tubes) and to me, I feel the Tudor has more of a rugged field aesthetic while the Ball leans closer on the dressy side.
also, for similar watches... I was cross shopping the Monta Atlas and if you can go quartz, the Luminox Dress Field 1832, the Alpina Alpiner Quartz.
@@vincentton4449 Monta Atlas/Triumph are so good for the price, fit perfectly too. I'd take that over Ball anyday
I love my first gen 2500 Planet Ocean 42mm, black dial/black bezel and white numerals, I know I'm biased but I feel it sometimes gets overlooked in the Omega diver lineup, to me it's the best looking modern Omega diver, I bought mine in 2010 and I've come to appreciate the look and dimensions even more over the years as the newer iterations have been released, I think the design was ahead of the curve when it comes to the classic aesthetic with a modern build quality, it's a keeper that I enjoy every time I put it on wrist.
Get the Breitling. I would recommend the bracelet. Breitling bracelets are sublime and something worth experiencing. Also, the market is over saturated so you can get serious discounts.
I had to make the exact same choices. In the end I went for the Tudor black bay steel. But it took me ages to decide! I looked at the breitling, the ball marvelite. And I may have been swayed by the longines big eye but I wanted a steel bracelet. Oh and I looked at the tag Heuer aquaracer, which I think is actually the best looking one. I do not regret buying the Tudor as it keeps fantastic time 2.5 seconds per day and feels as solid as a rock. Has the best resale value by miles as well. Many thanks Bruce for taking the time to do the video. It's a choice a lot of people have to make.
Agree absolutely what you say here Bruce . The age old problem with the tudor bb41 is the thickness . Although it is not ridiculous but no question it affects wearability. If it was your only watch you would become accustomed to it but when in rotation it’s always noticeable, my gmt will go out at some point due to this .. They really have to address the thickness, they have altered the movement for the 58 now they have to follow suit with the 41..
Your point is well taken with Ball watches. They are amazing time-pieces, but you can buy them pre-owned for half the listed MSRP.
The Truth Have you gone through a divorce? Lol Just breaking your Balls, man! 🤣
If you are lucky, you can even get them new for a bit above half the MSRP ;)
I am just waiting for my Roadmaster pilot GMT, which I bought for 1700 € (MSRP is around 3000€ where I live). But granted, the storeowner made a mistake there.
Bryan should go for the Breitling on rubber 👍🏻.
Which color has your SMP300? Wear it on bracelet or rubber?
I love the way you go through your thinking as discuss each one of these watches. It is very helpful as I think about my next purchase. - Thank you Bruce 😊👍
Bruce I haven’t shaved in 5 weeks and now I can’t tell if I have a pimple or just a lump of tangled hair. Have you had this problem? Asking someone with experience of facial hair growth beyond a few days. K, Thanks. Big fan of the channel.
Came for the talking Tudor.
Personally I cant get over the feeling that Tudor sold out to loyal customers. Their marketing direction and Ambassador choices just leaves little to desire. Ball has also stepped up the ladder and has done a tremendous job with their new movements. I personally would choose Ball over Tudor all day. Just my two cents.
Me too
I would absolutely take the 2017 Seamaster - I think that is the pinnacle of Seamaster styling . Tudor BB 36 is a sweet buy ! For the third guy - why not go off menu and get the BB Blue 79220B and the eta on bracelet .
Marcus G agree. Prefer the smpc to the current version. Classic size and styling won't go out of style.
Marcus G the 79220B is ridiculously thick. No way.
I currently own the considered Omega Seamaster 300 SMPc Midsize (36.25) in black and previously owned the Tudor 1926 (36mm) and I have a 6.5” wrist. In my opinion:
Tudor Black Bay 58 is internet hype. In person it’s not that great and faux patina will get old (no pun intended) sooner than later. The case wears huge as well (I admittedly like smaller watches). There’s a reason why Seamasters are regarded in the manner in which they are. The finishing, design and brushing/polish even when on my Nato is beyond impressive (from the lugs to the crown), and durable as can be (even details like having crown guards compared to none on the Tudor). The movement is awesome, I’m tracking +1.2sec a day (last test), and it’s very comfortable. The dial is awesome and the double AR coating makes the sapphire glass seem nonexistent. It’s not the perfect watch though - bracelet has no micro adjustments and when on bracelet it can feel heavy due to the construction of it. Actually that’s my only con, and you can purchase the adjustable clasp.
Tudor 1926 was ‘OKAY’ at best. The bracelet fits poorly on my 6.5” wrist and the watch itself didn’t wear that well on leather strap either. The dial was pretty boring in person and the date window threw everything off. Tudor cases aren’t very comfortable to me and the 1926 styling didn’t help make up for it.
triniboy05 So I’m considering either the seamaster 300 previous version or the speedmaster professional. Thoughts?
With regard to the first question, Omega. I like the Seamaster primarily for its flexibility. For me, it can be worn for any occasion. In my opinion, value is perceived. Rather than buying models like everyone else, I go more for uniqueness and what I like. That is why I would go for Ball. Breitling vs. Tudor, here I would jump on the Breitling. I also go for rugged tool watches and this Breitling would be my perfect beater.
Tudor reliable 😉 just finished watching a 30 min show on all the complaints. No back up service to start 😮
Omega all the way, in so many ways better than Rolex, 👍🏻
Marc Dee Rolex are too dressy and effeminate. Look like jewelry instead of tool watches.
@@Ferien7 That poor SM300 does not even look like watch. Looks like a toy.
Simon, to piggyback on what Bruce mentioned, i agree but maybe also consider what you want aesthetically out of this first luxury piece. The Tudor is great although it carrys a different look, a bit more reserved. If thats your jam than case closed but if you think that in the long run you’d want to have a bit of a flashier piece than maybe the seamaster is the one. Anyhow, just another aspect to consider. Good luck Simon and ENJOY the process!
I love breitling watches as for Tudor it’s the watch you buy when you can’t afford a Rolex
For the last one, I'd consider a Breitling Colt 41 also. Would wear even better and doesn't have the ugly numerals.
IMO:
1. Omega
2. Tudor
3. Breitling
Alex F the seamaster is way too dressy for a diver
Hard to argue, if you’re actually going to use it as a diver. But how many people do? If the gentleman is looking for a real diver at (or below) that price point, it’s Sinn U1 all day. Bruce, do you still have yours?
I don’t buy watches to sell so Im going with BALL. Real value $$$ for a serious watch.
Just bought the new and improved Seiko Marine Master 300 from a domestic AD for $2,300. Would love to have a smaller wrist and a Tudor or Brietling as a beater.
I would do:
1 BB58
2. Sinn a lot of choices I would do a 556i or 104 on bracelet
3. Breitling - Just make sure if you buy new get a HUGE discount they seem to loose a lot of value.
To the guys wanting to spend 2000 to 3000. Take a look at Lavrenture. High end swiss micro brand but oh man is the finishing of the case so amazing. Its a incredibly comfortable watch.
Looking to buy my first luxury watch.
Look at the Tudor black bay heritage 41mm black dial yellow details.
Thoughts? Budget around 4k.
I have a 6.5 inch wrist also and i have an omega 2254 and a bb58. Id say definately go bb58. The size just makes it for me.
Kyle Brabender but how’s the quality and finishing on the bb58? I’ve heard it’s really disappointing in person and very overhyped.
For the 6.5" wrist, *definitely* the BB58 - the flat dial Omega is nice, but too big for my 6.75" wrist - forget about the 42mm SM300 completely. My BB58 and 40mm Monta Oceanking are on my wrist by far the most of all my pieces.
I am looking to buy a Breitling Superocean
Ball all day long
I own both Tudor and Ball, I agree with you Bruce on being able to get Ball watches on a discount and Tudor being able to hold its value, however I would have to say that Ball might be the better buy because you can buy it at a discount, it’s an outstanding buy if you don’t plan on flipping it. With that said if you’re buying the Ball at the same price as the Tudor then you’re correct I’d go with Tudor , not because Ball isn’t on par with Tudor but because Tudor retains its value... Both pieces are outstanding so it all depends on the deal one gets
Where do you find them for a discount
@@sphinx9517 places like Chrono24 and Gray Market
I’ve got a Breitling Superocean Heritage, Tudor black bay GMT & a Rolex Datejust 41mm.. I’ve fallen out of love with my Tudor, my breitling is beautiful but it’s a 46mm. And the Rolex, well I wanna upgrade to the GMT Master II.. So I’ll get that in the afterlife!
Breitling Colt 41 mm silver dial is under my radar. The price is very good now. Looks like the Colt will be discontinued soon.
Number 1 - have to agree with Bruce and say the black bay 58, Number 2 definitely the Tudor, the Ball will lose nearly $1000 instantly ( I like Ball but just being honest ). As for alternatives Bruce hit the nail on the head with the Longines, I have it and love it. Number 3. The Tudor is the better buy, I would consider the Seiko Marinemaster as an alternative. The Breitling is a nice watch and is great for variety as it is a strap monster. Another alternative would be one of Sinn’s U series divers or their EZM series. Good luck lads and Nice video Bruce
Female viewers here. Please , do a video on 32mm to 36mm size on divers, aviators, chronograph etc . On the luxury side Tudor, Omega, Longines, Zenith etc. thank you
The Tudor Hydro 1200 crushes the Black Bay; however, it wasn’t available in the US, which is why it doesn’t get a lot of attention.
I’m looking at purchasing a Ball but on the used market where it has taken a $$$ hit. A Ball at around $1000 is a bargain and this just doesn’t happen with Tudor . Your taste in watches are basically the same as mine.
The guy loves Tudor.
The Breitling dial isn’t as well finished but it has a slimmer case. I’d agree with Bruce to buy one to beat up and of the two I’d go Tudor unless you change colour way and get the orange Breitling.
Maybe better to buy a Sinn as a beatup watch, wearing my 157 ST TY at work as a Mechanic for industrial tobacco machinery since 30 + years, for everything else I use a Breitling Chronomat Crosswind 2 tone and for sundays I normaly wear a Navitimer, have several. Or one of my Zenith el Primero when there are other collectors around ...
I agree, Rolex, Omega and Breitling
I have one ball watch, hopefully I can have two one day 🤦🏼♂️(black dial trainmaster tmt)
Don’t sleep on Oris and Bell & Ross timepieces, great quality for $1750-$2500.
Not bell and ross
If it’s an every day Watch you’re looking for why step down when you can step across. Get yourself a preowned Carl F Bucherer Patravi ScubaTec . 1950.1in-house finished ETA 2824-2 movement , certified Chronometer, 500 m dive rating drop dead looks that P all over the Breitling and isn’t trying to be similar to an older brother like the Tudor. It’s a genuine understated classic punching above its weight. Now is the era to break away from what the crowd is doing.Just my opinion still as I’m sticking the money away to get a rose gold and steel version.
There’s a lot more worthy contenders out there in other brands some with in-house movements for the three grand you’ve got to spend. Maybe even sit tight for a little bit and see if you can move up a notch without spending much more money than you’ve got to hand. Good luck.
Nices choices Bruce. Tudor 58 It's a beautiful watch, totally agree! Love the old Omega SM300, in my opinion new one looks disgusting. Cheers!
Bah Humbug. Stand out, get a Doxa 300t Orange face and live happily ever after that price point
I agree
Tudor Black Bay 58 could possibly end my obsession.
Nice to hear that the channel is growing. Well deserved!👍👍
Cool! Agree with your recommendations
What's your opinion about Jomashop?
Hey Simon check out the Omega Seamaster 1957 trilogy, 39mm and really nice limited edition
周庠 Great shout, but would have to be preowned 😐
I don't know about you guys, even if I can afford those luxury watches, I just couldn't buy it because I love Seiko.
I don’t think the 2017seamaster has a ceramic dial
Am I wrong?
Tudor
Ball
Tudor
Omega: Seamaster Diver, Seamaster 300, Aqua Terra, Speedmaster
Tudor: Black Bay 58, Pelagos, Black Bay GMT, Black Bay 36
Ball: Budget options
Breitling really doesn't compete here.
ekim andersom lmao, in what world does breitling have the best chrono?
I’d go Tudor here as well. Blue Balls are never a good thing.
McKenzie 😂😂😂
Tudor Black Bay 58 39mm next purchase for me
Hank Moody have you seen it in person?
Ferien7 yes did not try on
Close your eyes and pick you won’t be disappointed
Breitling Superocean Heritage II B01... those who know...know
I'm going to wait a few months for my next watch purchase. Let the recession deepen and prices will fall.
Miss you backdrop Bruce
Breitling is a nice piece.
1: Omega Seamaster vs. Tudor Black Bay: My choise is the Seamaster. Dont like the Dolphin Hourhand on the that Tudor. Overrated and so ugly.
2. Ball Engineer M Mavellight vs. Tudor BB 41: My choise is the Ball. I own one. So much better technically and it looks fantastic. The BB 41 is inferior in every way. And i don't give a s**t about the secondary market. I buy a watch because Im like it!!!
3. Tudor BB vs. Breitling Superocean: My choise is the Breitling: I like the style of that watch. Had one before. With Tudor same as before. Such an ugly hourhand. I always think something is wrong with that watch....
and that Longines Chrono is also quite nice.
you straight up don't like Tudor I guess
I actually really like the snowflake hands. Shows how subjective watches are.
@@philipmallory1 yes not so much.
Agreed on the Ball, fantastic watches. I'm also not into buying to flick on, but to keep and enjoy.
what I think you are trying to say here is brand value is a huge factor. As a watch fanatic. you have to maintain value so that when you wanna trade out you get most of your money back. losing value keeps you from buying more watches later. I personally want a ball skindiver 2, but I aint paying full value, but if I buy it right its still a good move for me. I can enjoy it and if I want something else, if bought right I can get most of my money back.
$2,000 to $3,000 budget for me, I will purchase Breitling Chronomat Colt 41 mm. Breitling has more finest.
Bruce your getting thinner! For a minute I thought I clicked Teddy B. Channel. 😉
Thanks bro!
Tudor is a yawner for me. Sure, they may keep value more, but that's not always a reason to wear a watch.
The correct answer is none of the above...save for Rolex. Best decision Ive ever made.
Dylan Rolex are way too dressy. Sold mine. No thanks. Look like watches for women instead of men.
Reference of the Tudor at 10:07?
Impressed you brought Ball in against the everyman luxury watch norms.
Ryan: 1st question. Why? You have a Rolex and Omega for your divers. Obviously you like your divers and now want another. But, hey! You can get a diver and have a chronograph to boot. Talking Tudor Black Bay Chronograph. Great Pre-owned, or Gray market is about in your price range.
The rivets on the BB58 bracelet are so tacky. Omega all day, every day. Wearing my 300m SMPc right now (black.)
moeharri do you not find the bracelet too thick since it doesn’t taper? Only thing holding me back from pulling trigger on it.
moeharri the bracelet on the seamaster is tacky
One of these brands is not like the other
One of these brands doesn’t belong...
I really did laugh when I read this one
Yes and that is a good thing.
Bruce is moving away from Seiko! No more Seikopath! You are cured! Hahaha
Once a seikopath always a seikopath
Neither the Black Bay or the Super ocean. Get the Super ocean heritage 2, much nicer!
The snowflake hands are bothering me, also the clasp is tinny and flimsey i think 🤷♂️
The clasp and bracelet are made to a very high standard, certainly not tinny, you won’t be disappointed
How is the weight loss program going? Haha unlike some luxury guru you don't wanna reboot haha.😜
It's good thanks. Down 35 pounds and slowly dropping. Feeling great and excited about the progress
why do i hate tudor so much?
In regards to Tudor and Omega comparison. Bad advice. If Tudor didn’t have a 3rd degree connection to Rolex, nobody would care about them. They lean on celebrity endorsements for clout. Never ever everrrrrrrr would I choose a Tudor over an Omega. Not ever.
Not at all. You need to look objectively on a model by model basis. Having owned multiple from each brand it definitely is a model by model basis for superiority
The Tudor BB58 has nice proportions but I can't stand non-pointy hands, e.g. I hate that snowflake.
Bani Niba the bb58 is really boring looking