I think AI is fine if we properly tax automation at a high enough rate to pay for all basic needs(food/housing/water/energy)meaning you can keep your art as a hobby & make a few bucks on it without the need of surviving off it, same for all other automated jobs, you can do it as a hobby if wanted. Anyways in 30 years AI Art will be outdated because neutral/link Art will be able to perfectly copy/design digital art without the need to even move a muscle, just a single thought can copy a flawless image or thinking about the brush strokes in real-time, even flawlessly render movie like memories/creating video in real-time swapping actors creating unique stories/dialog & backgroundsets & what not. Almost no skill needed what so ever.
@@TamilVolk Ah makes sense. Like filters as in the ones similar to Snapchat that are installed on phones now to smooth skin? Or? I was going to say! You got baby's skin! You found the fountain of youth or something 😂😭
If you think this video was bad enough, here's something to cheer you up. AI advancement isn't accelerating. It's jolting. That means that the acceleration is accelerating. There's no shot openAI doesn't already have AGI.
@@TamilVolk yeah but like.... the point: you think its 3-5 years because of the acceleration. but... the acceleration is accelerating. the rate of learning and emergent skills is jolting, it isnt just accelerating. we need to get off the dystopian capitalist economy asap. everybody needs to get political, fast. everybody needs to take ownership of their politics and their votes. everybody that lives in a democracy needs to do this or were in for a hell of a fuckin ride lol
AI created work definitely can't be copyrighted, especially in the US. The supposed copyrights people claim they have on AI generated content wouldn't hold up in court, unless the courts have changed their minds since the Monkey selfie copyright lawsuit a few years ago.
The argument for that is copyright usually made for a specific thing. If I drew first superman, anyone who copies it, I can sue them because I lose money. Ai mixes thousands of thousands of videos. Nobody knows what belongs to who anymore. Also if a company uses Ai, for example the intro for the Marvel TV show that happened last year, who will sue them, the viewer? It would have to be ALL people who were used in the training data. Thousands of people suing at the same time for 0.0000001 cent of profit lost. It's really hard to make that happen.
Obviously, I can't predict the future, but as of now, the text-to-image concept yields results that are too random. This randomness might suffice for uses like replacing stock images and footage, or creating background characters, etc. Making a movie involves numerous intentional visual decisions that cannot be precisely described in text. It would have to be left to the algorithm, accepting an infinite number of random outcomes. Undoubtedly, AI will significantly impact the industry. However, I am not yet convinced that simply typing a prompt into a machine will produce a movie that people want to watch. My guess is that AI will be integrated into all the tools and devices used in filmmaking. This will make movie production cheaper and further democratize it, even more than digitalization has. This has its upsides and downsides.
I totally agree. I tried using AI to get images I wanted, and it was super hard and not specific. The thing is there are customized models. For example people upload every frame from Miyazaki movies, then have their own footage. And just run it through that. It will make it look like his movies, which will include the colors and everything. Sora is corporate made, but you could upload your own footage and train your own model, it will be game over in my opinion. For the cheaper part, I kinda feel like it will be closer to green screens. More and more companies have green screen, which leads to people saving on preproduction and just trying to crunch on time. “ We will fix it in post” mentality had been killing storytelling in movies a little bit. Everything is less and less intentional. Everything can be fixed. It might have a similar effect.
I feel ya. I know AI has been implemented in more important fields like medicine but why not point it toward something more important? Make new smarter materials for industry or biotech.. look into ways for shrinking the plastic problem with bio engineering. There are so many other more important things it could be used for, but we've landed on making stuff look pretty for cheaper. It's really a bummer.
Yeah I totally agree. Instead of getting rid of mundane problems like getting visa renewed, we are giving fun and passionate careers to robots lol. Like why?
You need creatives to prompt it to make what you want. Just new type of creatives. Dream big, new world. And what was the point of you wanting to be an artist. Did you have a vision with it? why can't AI rocket ship that artistry? were you really a creative? You can draw and let AI make it more alive. wherever AI goes, use it to amplify what you already creatively have.
I was mentioning in the video how uber basically made everyone a taxi driver, which run the salary to the ground. Nobody can make a living from it anymore. If anyone can pick up Ai, then the labor will become cheaper and cheaper. For prompting part, that's not even an option anymore. There are Ai that will prompt for you and will make it better than most people. Capitalism takes labor and time and gives you money for it. If all you do is to write and click a button, nobody will want to pay you full time salary for it.
Dude there are millions of people dying of hunger in the world every year before AI. Like basic simple hunger or disease that cost $5 to prevent. Whatever jobs disappears or not to AI stop complaining. People lose job everyday for thousands different reasons. Life was hard before AI. Look for ways to make things better instead of blaming stuff you have no control over.
I hear your concern about global issues, and you're right, there are urgent challenges like hunger that demand attention. However, addressing one issue doesn't negate the importance of discussing the impact of AI. It's possible to advocate for both societal well-being and responsible Ai use. There should be laws for Ai. There are none so far. If something is out so powerful is out of control, there will be consequences.
![SORA AI’s Problems [And Solutions]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cRmPlFidVkk/mqdefault.jpg)
I hope tech AI bros will come to this comment section and argue with me. I will enjoy reading it 😅
I think AI is fine if we properly tax automation at a high enough rate to pay for all basic needs(food/housing/water/energy)meaning you can keep your art as a hobby & make a few bucks on it without the need of surviving off it, same for all other automated jobs, you can do it as a hobby if wanted.
Anyways in 30 years AI Art will be outdated because neutral/link Art will be able to perfectly copy/design digital art without the need to even move a muscle, just a single thought can copy a flawless image or thinking about the brush strokes in real-time, even flawlessly render movie like memories/creating video in real-time swapping actors creating unique stories/dialog & backgroundsets & what not.
Almost no skill needed what so ever.
How is your skin so smooth and clear!? I need whatever you're on! Wow!
It's all about light and filters lolol I look like a gremlin IRL
@@TamilVolk Ah makes sense.
Like filters as in the ones similar to Snapchat that are installed on phones now to smooth skin? Or?
I was going to say! You got baby's skin!
You found the fountain of youth or something 😂😭
If you think this video was bad enough, here's something to cheer you up. AI advancement isn't accelerating. It's jolting. That means that the acceleration is accelerating. There's no shot openAI doesn't already have AGI.
Acceleration accelerating is called velocity. We are not ready for how quickly tech is advancing.
I think Sora Ai is just the beginning. I totally know that in 3-5 years it will be hard to tell between real and Ai footage.
@@TamilVolk yeah but like.... the point: you think its 3-5 years because of the acceleration. but... the acceleration is accelerating. the rate of learning and emergent skills is jolting, it isnt just accelerating.
we need to get off the dystopian capitalist economy asap. everybody needs to get political, fast. everybody needs to take ownership of their politics and their votes. everybody that lives in a democracy needs to do this or were in for a hell of a fuckin ride lol
AI created work definitely can't be copyrighted, especially in the US. The supposed copyrights people claim they have on AI generated content wouldn't hold up in court, unless the courts have changed their minds since the Monkey selfie copyright lawsuit a few years ago.
The argument for that is copyright usually made for a specific thing. If I drew first superman, anyone who copies it, I can sue them because I lose money. Ai mixes thousands of thousands of videos. Nobody knows what belongs to who anymore. Also if a company uses Ai, for example the intro for the Marvel TV show that happened last year, who will sue them, the viewer? It would have to be ALL people who were used in the training data. Thousands of people suing at the same time for 0.0000001 cent of profit lost. It's really hard to make that happen.
Obviously, I can't predict the future, but as of now, the text-to-image concept yields results that are too random. This randomness might suffice for uses like replacing stock images and footage, or creating background characters, etc.
Making a movie involves numerous intentional visual decisions that cannot be precisely described in text. It would have to be left to the algorithm, accepting an infinite number of random outcomes.
Undoubtedly, AI will significantly impact the industry. However, I am not yet convinced that simply typing a prompt into a machine will produce a movie that people want to watch.
My guess is that AI will be integrated into all the tools and devices used in filmmaking. This will make movie production cheaper and further democratize it, even more than digitalization has. This has its upsides and downsides.
I totally agree. I tried using AI to get images I wanted, and it was super hard and not specific.
The thing is there are customized models. For example people upload every frame from Miyazaki movies, then have their own footage. And just run it through that. It will make it look like his movies, which will include the colors and everything. Sora is corporate made, but you could upload your own footage and train your own model, it will be game over in my opinion.
For the cheaper part, I kinda feel like it will be closer to green screens. More and more companies have green screen, which leads to people saving on preproduction and just trying to crunch on time. “ We will fix it in post” mentality had been killing storytelling in movies a little bit. Everything is less and less intentional. Everything can be fixed. It might have a similar effect.
Good points!
Glad you enjoyed it
Tamil, Look into our transition from the Capitalist Corporate Economy to the Capitalist Meaning Economy.
It'll make you feel better about AI
Any specific articles or links I should check out?
I feel ya. I know AI has been implemented in more important fields like medicine but why not point it toward something more important? Make new smarter materials for industry or biotech.. look into ways for shrinking the plastic problem with bio engineering. There are so many other more important things it could be used for, but we've landed on making stuff look pretty for cheaper. It's really a bummer.
Yeah I totally agree. Instead of getting rid of mundane problems like getting visa renewed, we are giving fun and passionate careers to robots lol. Like why?
Like this video if you want Ai to take over the world * beep boop * (please help)
You need creatives to prompt it to make what you want. Just new type of creatives. Dream big, new world. And what was the point of you wanting to be an artist. Did you have a vision with it? why can't AI rocket ship that artistry? were you really a creative? You can draw and let AI make it more alive. wherever AI goes, use it to amplify what you already creatively have.
I was mentioning in the video how uber basically made everyone a taxi driver, which run the salary to the ground. Nobody can make a living from it anymore. If anyone can pick up Ai, then the labor will become cheaper and cheaper. For prompting part, that's not even an option anymore. There are Ai that will prompt for you and will make it better than most people. Capitalism takes labor and time and gives you money for it. If all you do is to write and click a button, nobody will want to pay you full time salary for it.
Unleash AI, unfiltered, without limitations.
But for what though?
It’s gonna replace our jobs and our lives will be revolve around family, art, design, travel, etc
Yet you will still have to stand in line in DMV to get your license renewed for 3 hours lol future is here
Dude there are millions of people dying of hunger in the world every year before AI. Like basic simple hunger or disease that cost $5 to prevent. Whatever jobs disappears or not to AI stop complaining. People lose job everyday for thousands different reasons. Life was hard before AI. Look for ways to make things better instead of blaming stuff you have no control over.
I hear your concern about global issues, and you're right, there are urgent challenges like hunger that demand attention. However, addressing one issue doesn't negate the importance of discussing the impact of AI. It's possible to advocate for both societal well-being and responsible Ai use. There should be laws for Ai. There are none so far. If something is out so powerful is out of control, there will be consequences.
Your argument is a red herring. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Ai has destroyed art professions
Not yet, but it prob will