Can A.I. replicate YouTube comments?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
- WARNING: Some of the comments in this video may not be kid-friendly to read! So blink for a really long time if you need to.
OH MY PRAND my camera angle was so bad in this video. I'm sorry, viewers... in my next video, I'll learn to put the camera a little higher. Maybe then it won't feel so off balance...
Andrej Karpathy's blog post on RNNs: karpathy.github...
Music:
"Cary's Theme" by Mustache Walrus • Cary's Theme - Ten Wor...
"Xenogenesis" by TheFatRat • TheFatRat - Xenogenesi...
Ai generated memes. A meme sweatshop if you will
Jay Reimann Gnome Child, what can you detect in that folder
"Shit tier sweatshop memes"
i'd say shitpostbot5000 but we all know it isn't one : ^)
LOL
Jay Reimann that's the shitpostbot5000 on Twitter. the sad thing is, it's honestly one of the funniest things ever
shitpostbot5000 does that
Hey you should do this on comments from r/totallynotrobots. Just imagine a human trying to make a robot immatate a human’s imitation of a robot’s imitation of a human
This is actually a genius idea
Yo, dawg!
WHY ARE YOU SCREAMING, FELLOW HUMAN?
*inception sound*
That's some insane inception there.
You're making this too hard. Just feed it a list of curse words; all-purpose insults; a couple old memes and copypastas; every racial, ethnic, and religious slur you can think of; toss in "First!", "Like if you agree!", and a command to spam random emojis for good measure, then have it spit out selections from the list in random strings of varying length. Computery could be seamlessly YouTubing with the best(?) of them within hours.
Lol...
👏🏼
*perfection*
I had exactly the same idea
This comment is overrated
6:06 it learned bitch after 17 minutes, gj youtube
JazevoAudiosurf 6:03 it was so close to fū*"
JazevoAudiosurf and cake XD
JazevoAudiosurf ◌̥
🅱itch 🅱here
*B R O I G S D A Y D A Y A N G B E S T*
maybe put the Harry Potter books in and see if it can make a fanfic?
That is a good idea, but how would the training data be organized?
I am thinking of having every sentence as a piece of data, but only sentences with pronouns and/or proper nouns are used.
Andrew Kovnat would sentences pulled at random work better?
Possibly, but the sentences would be too varied and different, and I think an AI would have too much information to create informational sentences, or sentences with any use...
Or maybe there could be a 50% chance the sentence will be random.
But they need to go one after another to make some sense
Andrew Kovnat I like that idea. What other problems could there be, though?
What if all the people in this comment section are AI? WHAT IF I AM AI?
That means that you are A EYE
must be an organic version
I CAN ASSURE YOU WE ALL ARE HUMAN.
NOTHING REMOTELY ROBOT-LIKE.
MY HARD DRIVE ACHES THINKING OF SUCH AN ASININE SCENARIO.
Or maybe robot flower
@DerpToni616372 What's with this photo? I see it everywhere!!
My cat could replicate UA-cam comments, and I don't even have a cat
-A UA-cam comment
Severus Snape r
/r/hmmm
-A Cat
+Jamin Jedi r/woosh
@@mikomihael6478 nigga thats not a wossh
One of the comments it generated was "first" 😂😂😂
perfection.
A weapon to surpass metal gear
Then it’s doing its job
first
evidence of the peak of human evolution displayed through AI
Actually, 1 minute of training led accurate copies of YT comments
maibywDuoF: pon
Actually, that's 2 minutes. Things like "☐" are at 1 minute.
it’s a joke....
Mopscrub due u lis iy
Mopscrub this giys id righ doy judhe hk
"What is my purpose"
"You write comments"
"Oh my god"
"Yeah welcome to the club pal"
DaMuffin! Pass the god damn butter
12:04 The surname is sanchez! XD
Wow I didn't even see
Yeah I'll just bring this in and get an A.
Butter!
"Wanna watch a UA-cam Video?"
"No"
"Well your a comment, it makes sense why, you would just put a lot of f-*burp*ucking opinions.
"Not very smart"
Creates evolution in a box
But how does it fit in the box?
1noxaj Because it evolved to fit
Well, he said the program was made by someone else.
6:53 just a comment that says first love it
6:54
6:53
6:54
are your so much uneure! WHERE IS NOT MATCH WHES GO DINUIN. ITS BACK THE HINIS BACK SO PENCILS.
+CrezbaL!lankSil DieBraser Arain”Ohan Likbs / BackleW
"My son is craped"
Deccadeo UA-cam “1, and bubble! Hope you elease is a reboot.”
Also, forgot to mention: The AI put “are”, not “is”.
Dagasi
I am so cube :3
where is it i was tryna search it
It's interesting how the A.I. is able to generate Finnish right from the start.
daPvta my thought exactly
They do say Finnish is easy to learn.
Simple Reason Apparently it's also hard to English learning.
BOLO9 Pretty sure they were trying to make a pun
This is the #1 most generated result:
"Pen!!!!!!!!!1111 pineapple apple pen"
#2 most generated result:
*I stum•bléd ön a si•të thãt gị•vëš åw•ay fre•e prêm•ium Min•ec•raft accs! Jûs•t typ•ę thî•s ma•gicál cöd•e tø th•ę Göo•gle se•arch bar ▶️ mcpa6969plzstahpscamming*
Wow! I found free $1!
Search code NOTSCAM on Google
@@ConMan4 how many times were you wooooshed?
Yep... Humanity is disappointing.
7:00
"Ffgiandyow Zapple: i am so cube :3"
God help us all.
But I get to abouta Firey Jeerre has Not!!
Brad Kimi: next grams!!!!!!!!!!
David
6:15 "Dlsewer Dasses: I Minch"
Oh no, computer furries!
Do this with comments from political videos so it starts arguing with itself
Let's give it some training data: Conservatives are stupid and are ruining this country
I found the troll
Liberals are stupid and are ruining this country
Every Conservative is a Nazi
Every Liberal is Stalin
7:20 "These are not real accounts:
Frosted Robot 22: *Am I a joke to you?*
You should make an ai learn to distinguish between normal comments and spam comments.
then maybe it can do something useful
Don't even need a neural net for that, and it's pretty much the most common application of machine learning. Aka, boring.
otacon1024 exactly. Inputs are pretty simple considering the spam comments, and there's only 1 output for all of them which is delete.
Why ;(
theres a difference?
NerestroNL I think that's the way the algorithm works.. It is divided in two neural networks, one that generates the comments, and another one that tells if the comment is human or ai,and if it is ai it improves until it can't recognize no more. Both neural networks improve, and it's faster and more accurate. But I'm not sure if he was using this algorithm.
i vote eggy
First
Teardrop
Awkward Cubes wut
Sans SS book [Qatar Mapping] Bfdi
I saw that frame. When your AI is typing 'First' in the youtube comments you've done it it right :P
Awkward Cubes I vote hypercube
I don't care if a hypercube is a character
Match? Hiil bug.
Hotel? Trivago.
6:26
Welcome back? Disnike eliminate episode.
I like the AI generated usernames e.g. 8:03, "Anthony N Animal Jam" and "Joseph and cat game lovers"
8bitpineapple and Mr Sinner
i found out Anthony N Animal Jam is a real user. wow
@@kettlekitty Yeah and it's shit
Patchcat 1223 isn't it by NatGeo?
@@longevitee just because it's educational doesn't mean it's good lol
Plus the community is toxic and cringey so I guess there's that
Ok, moment of truth. *turns on AI*
"Whats the song"
"Darude Sandstorm"
Turboparker you just mindstormed my mind. Wich is a bit like a sandstorm, but in my mind lmao
lol
the channel will help the future.... with grant thompson
Emeron at least you didn't get mind flooded.
a-lpha of Zeldaforme Gaming: Definitely.
12:33
"Daniel Muniz: .
REAL HUMAN COMMENT
dafuq
yis dud
.
@@akeiai ivribody does dat
Bro, you write memes in UA-cam comments... So lame
a true intellectual
6:54
Computer generated unoriginal comments ( Middle one)
FEHRSST
The Grocery THaNG thank you
It's honestly sad that the AI saw so many of those comments that it learned to make them itself..
I vote eggy
Comments are 99% shit and 1% trash
Wockes which one are you?
Wockes and 7% bad at math
Chozeh Abaddon shit is harder to clean up
but some comments can come in useful
a-lpha of Zeldaforme Gaming "can come in useful"
prime example
Try generating off the "Important videos" or "Instant regret" playlists. It would take weeks of generating (maybe pause after every video) but a more accurate A.I. might be generated. Note I said MIGHT.
I saw a comment that had generated "first". Thanks comment section.
first
That’s “hurah roms”. I’m subscribed to him.
I don't know why people are commenting "first". it's not like The Amazing Race tho
I vote for pen
bump
ogh
AI: Let me make an account, so I can make comments!
UA-cam: I am not a robot
AI: *heavy breathing*
Can A. I. replicate Donald Trump's Twitter posts?
easily
Sad fake crooked hillary newswall.
Well, it's good at predictable, obvious patterns...
AverageGeek No... The AI would be to reasonable...
AverageGeek NO NO FUCKING NOPE
For a split second, I saw the AI generate the word "Porn". I forgot when that happened, so I'll timestamp it when I get the chance.
10 months later
Absolute Inksanity 13 months later
5:47 top box of comments says pom
1 year later
the generated name:
Adam Williamson decoinitantats dost.
beautiful
this will be my sons name
\\\
O
Also "benginefleRago cracches"
I really like the way you present your results. You don't even need to know anything in programming to understand what's going on and it's not boring to watch.
*c a t*
"."
*_real human comment_*
.
ㅤ
@@LordDingus69 unicode
.
.
My favorite fake comment:
TheEpicLoesSTannisisTallassersFTLTC: wb barfbag
What the heck is golf ball got elimbed about it?
oh fck
6:54 first, followed by another first. it's real jesus christ
ruining ur day first
Justin Y. already mastered this
lmao
he dead
@@eswee6780 nah he ded
@@wacknesium as in real dead?
Es Wee no you’re right he’s not popular no more
i am so cube :3"
Im a broken cube just look at my icon
Umitalia nyan
Actually, since the Circular Profile Picture Revolution (which doesn’t actually have a name) (circa 2018), everybody is now a circle.
i am illuminati
@@dombomb64 says the Google-auto-generated lowercase "d" on a deep purple background.
I feel very cat
Welsh. It's generating Welsh.
bug fighter fighuvuiv uilbugbityv uggjigghgiv guy
Uggvugv svt Niihau vchyfc.
Eiersmijter Dyma’r Gymraeg
Tetrahedrony dab
The conputers have learned “Like if you agree!”. We must run away.
Like if you agree
Are you a computer
*_c o n p u t e r_*
*_k o n p u t e r_*
@@krix q o n p u t e r r s
hope i didnt get rotten bananas on that
lol 7:03 after 375 mins : Leafy can sing the childing
Silenc3 And in that same frame it made a comment asking for likes :P
Silenc3 at 7:04 it said evil leafy
I'm an AI shitposter
function ReplicateUA-camComments(video)
{
UA-cam[video].Comments.Write(Date.Year + '?');
}
That's it. Replicating UA-cam most liked comments.
>_>
ikr
function ReplicateYTComments(video) {
UA-cam[video].Comment.Write(Date.Year + “?”)
}
here's in java, all in a folder I'd call... AIYT:
Put this in a "main.java" file:
void main(String[] args) {
video carykhSYtAi = ua-cam.com/video/oJeOvjJmKQ8/v-deo.html;
copyOfUA-camCe;
}
String copyOfUA-camComment(video v) {
return video.comments
}
And this in a "video.java" file:
public class video {
private String link;
public video(String link) {
setLink(link);
}
public String getLink() {
return link;
}
public void setLink(String link) {
this.link = link;
}
}
*"Anthony N Animal Jam"*
(comment marked as spam)
Match is joining btw
[comment deleted]]
[comment removed due to a copyright violation]
5:56 Top one! "p eee"
7:29
"Go blocky, come back blocky"
"FIREY JR 4LIEF"
"Dora."
5:46 its pretty much perfectly replicating most of the comments in those spiderman and elsa type videos
xD
OMG GROOVY WTH ARE U DOING HERE
groovy
Q: Can artificial intelligence replicate UA-cam comments?
A: No, this can be done only by artificial stupidity
this comment is underrated
UA-cam comment skynet. After a month training on reading what humans write on videos, the computer determines humans are beyond contempt and initiates judgement day
someone please count up all the votes the computer made and see who won
6:59
“I vote match because I pick tear drop. pls who die so half brought of the lagh that your look?”
7:22 Le Pen wins office confirmed.
WesOfX That made me laugh ^.^
:) really though, my bets are on Le Pen for president of France.
WesOfX Le Pen will not win the second turn
You made a bad bet. Geert lost. Le Pen will too if France is half as smart as the Dutch.
WesOfX Le panda
SNOWBALL!
Newstamey so what go watctition is just a BFDI because howser bros. Eraser why I
6:40 _"E vote for plus pooty jail mustn sudn to const back!"_
Those words emanate wisdom...
what the heck is golf ball?!
SuperiorZeeko golf is a game where people try to hit a ball into a hole. A golf ball is the ball you are trying to hit into the hole.
a bossy ball
SuperiorZeeko GBGB for short. Pencil:Yep Yep
These are not real UA-cam accounts?
*Creates FrostedRobot22*
I'm offended.
FrostedRobot22 , Huh, a frobot.
Whatever will they think of next..?
Frosted like a chocolate cake.
Well, excuse you.
EdgedPixel XD
Thats perfectly replicated....
Now someone set this up on a random UA-cam channel and see if anyone finds out
8:35 Jacob "Farras: I love how leafy is back cuz he was cool" - What have you done? Kill it with fire!
Some shoutouts!
6:39 Shoutout to Eymox Mutthus for being the first “commmenter” to spell “I vote for (blank)” correctly.
6:54 Shoutout to BlueKenne for voting the first contestant to say “Lollipoop” first. Also, shoutout to “hurah roms” for posting the first “First” comment.
6:57 Shoutout to (Name Not Detected) for being the first “commenter” to have an entire comment of one letter/symbol.
7:01 Shoutout to Dominic Animator for being the first to impersonate a popular youtuber.
Is "Name Not Detected " gihdora7?
8:20
8:00
I need pen pls
Facebotter Lol
Facebotter at the bottom
6:52 tennis ball the pop 13 times a mongise: Puffball if i cute
I am so cube :3
I dont think the AI is making errors I think it's doing that intentionally, due to people not proof reading there own comments. Try sampling a book instead.
@@celestialTangle that's not a woooosh not every time someone makes a mistake theyre joking
"Due to people not proofreading *there* own comments" ironic XD
@@theniski they are talking about the AI making intentional mistakes and made a mistake
R/woooosh
@@ThomasFarquhar2 how do you even know they're doing it intentionally. there's zero proof for that and you all are just saying that for a dumbass excuse to bring back this shit cancer to life
it's a joke ffs
The puffy hate shapes the back.
The existence completes the comfort
The bit greets the certain thing.
Why does the burly reason specialize the respect?
The spectacular trick counsels the rain.
The hate solds the shock.
The daughter elects the iron.
Why does the twist solicit the mammoth kick?
NyGromei 4 4 4 and A 5 e4: It'll to get tjryuwaa of i!n .is all a Pen WHen it it 1 timedie Porewerth.
What is the square route of a fish? Space now is sad. A ER or at me banana toast muffin to know help I’m a computer your Brutus put
Computery is already a better rapper than Lil (insert literally any noun)
1, and Bubble! Hope you elease is a reboot. It would love it to join butt to dovember a freenning
Bashu you are not BluTallulah so no nonsense
Seems legit
When you explained the technical parts of the neural network all I heard was "and then these thingys fire at that other thingy with a lot of things or not depending if they're 1 or 0 which then turns into lava if the dwarfs make up the total sum of
You'd obviously get much better results if you fed better data into the network. Feeding character by character means the network needs to learn what combination of characters even is an actual word. If you fed in entire words it would be more about constructing a sentence out of those words. If you asked any human person "can you replicate youtube comments?" they would think about replicating the grammatical structure and message that commonly appears in a youtube comment and using words rather than characters as basic building blocks would put much more focus on the correct question. By extension, you can extrapolate your choice of feeding in characters further to see the problem more clearly: imagine instead feeding the screenshot of a youtube comment into an image recognition network - it would first have to learn what kind of line shapes even form valid glyphs and this would remove it even farther from the actual question you are asking.
what
Arjun Satarkar i think this one was AI generated
yes that is probably true, but carykh probably wanted his network to start from scratch rather than giving it a dictionary.
Lol so loooong
@@jonathankydd1816 so he gave it an alphabetical list? Better give the clanker paint and tell it to draw comments.
i am so cube :3
"Cee Pearg. Fod yo 1h th iw Na Leile! I"
-Bot with a loss of 2.811
Na Leile!
"rdpftpeslortopA eANolyle3aoaecfu-GcZyo!it"
-Bot with 3.905 loss
7:22 "These are not real UA-cam accounts"
I searched up Frosted Robot 22...
...he's actually real
...and it's a legit account since the channels first video was in May 2016, way before this video (March 2017)
...or maybe the A.I just completely copied the username in, idk
most definetly the latter, someone named iMiner was also in there and is a legit channel (he's actually in this comment section, few pages from the top)
Roses are Red, Violets are blue, there's always an Asian who's better than you
Tabaskokaffe123 I’m Asian.
Tabaskokaffe123 Lol racist.
I'm Asian and I know that's true.
Tabaskokaffe123 that's racist
Truer words have never been said. 😂
5:55 my personal favorite is
"p eee"
And just like in a regular youtube comment, someone says first 229 minutes after the first comment
People dont understand what this program is trying to do, all its trying to do is copy the input log word by word. Given an infinite time both input and output will have the exact same wording. What you're doing is basically looking at the results before is gets a chance to do this and thus what the A.I has made looks like is creative and intellegent, but in reality just has word bites wrongly arranged and not fully completed, compared to the input.
chris howarth if cross-validation is used, the best version of the program can never be the one that exactly replicates the training data set
Ok, what do you mean cross-validation, is this the user telling the A.I if an action is correct or not?
First of all, sorry for wrongly using the word cross-validation. That is the term for regression problems, I just realised that this will not be the same. But the overall concept is the same:
What you describe is the following: (correct me if I'm wrong) In one generation, all the different versions of the neural net are evaluated by comparing their output comments to the input human comments. The version of the neural network that can create comments that are the most similar to the input comments gets the highest score and is deemed the best. This leads indeed to a program that is trying to perfectly recreate its input comment. This is called overfitting
You can overcome that problem by splitting the dataset. For example: if 1000 human comments are available, 750 comments will be fed to the neural network as input and the neural nets create comments. These computer generated comments are compared to the remaining 250 human comments that the neural network does not know about. This way, the program that replicates the input comments fails horribly when compared to the 250 new comments and only the neural networks that can "predict" what an unknown comment looks like is deemed good.
Ok but if your "splitting the dataset" method has a score still determined by closeness to the original input (1000 comments) even though you're inputting only 750 comments, won't it still converge to the exact wording given enough time.
Good point.. when given enough time, than indeed overfitting on the validation data set will occur. And given infinite time, eventually the output will resemble the validation data set too much and lose its predictive power.
Cross-validation helps with this problem but does not solve it (I looked it up and it is used in predictive moddeling as well. Wikipedia explains it better then I can)
Overfitting might indeed be inevitable given enough time. I have no personal experience with neural networks (only in classical data-analysis and regressions), so I can't say for sure.
"DobianmCeglaldon Pidabrang: Heosder." My favourite comment, so close, so cool but still not quite it.
A potato falling on a keyboard can simulate YT comments and possibly look more intelligent than most comments.
true
den jtvgghjf see g u I loo dfn7
fycfddrdeeeedfffhnn a little more about the three types and names of all time to translate it was intentional but vghggfdfvvvvvvvvggghyg
keyword: possibly
In the future, humour will be randomly generated.
Turn the speed to 2x when it’s generating comments and the music is better
Akch
I vote for pen!
SF1NX CZ I vote for LePen
Quentin Januel Le Pen is dumb
SF1NX CZ Le pen
SF1NX CZ Le punch
How did you factor in replies? Were they stored as multiple comments but with some kind of identifier or was the context lost in almost all replies? I personally would have just tried to filter them out because incorporating adequate context seems too complex for an AI already struggling. Still impressive and better than what I've got so far!
Why are comments complaining about other comments the worst? Im gonna complain about your comment on the comments that complain about other comments in the comment section!
>:(
Yeet
lol
i think "michael and me's" is proper grammar for the end thing.
gygabite no, "and me " is never proper. it's me and, or and i
maybe :"It's me and michael who have 19th birthday"?
gygabite the correct phrasing is "Michael's and my"
A rule of thumb is to use whichever word that would sound right if you took out the other person from the sentence. So "Today is (Michael's and) my birthday" rather than "Today is (Michael's and) me's birthday"
Me and michael's
Or
Michael and I's
Right?
"Asdlir Tas: conaleach np owso Pprdy?"
why did I find this channel so late? so much amazing stuff, never stop pls thx
Why do humans post those comments that doesn't make sense at all?
Whoy doy hummns pos annthn atall?
Pig butt and Uranus.
cimmik Because They Aren't, their Bots.
GrmpeTdeq IES!!!? oiw WOIQA" Maedeentkjeekateooseas.tyEReeAAKojE
You should get it to replicate usernames
He is JustinY we got em ladies and gentleman - Me 2019
"jyujhnyujnyujn"
It could just that type that, thats a "comment" too
And then write an AI, that tries to prove if a comment is from the AI or a Human, and give some of the Data to the Generator AI to Improve it lol
Wwhat you just described is called a GAN and is used commonly for generating images such as faces.
6:12 when it said Rinf See Top: 5 venD"ROADH" It really hit home.
3:56 0.69 seconds
"Hello, I'm a AI"
"This was a show I created for kids"
Cries in adult...
"For Kids"
Show contains litteral death jokes some of which involve murder
Also "Uh Pin, wrong finger"
in my dream last night there was a bfdi season 1 episode but a character actually said a bad word and no it wasn't a dub it was the actual huang voices
F U C C
D I C C
B I C H
D A N G
Flashlight Who!?
As an AI, I regret to inform you that I am unable to replicate UA-cam comments.
Build a hackintosh,
Throw away Mac
Problem solved!