I honestly love my omega speedmaster it’s reliable and it was not to expensive compared to Rolex. I like rolexes but I am going to always stay with omega for ever !
Exact. As a Swiss citizen I can confirm. 20-25 years ago Rolex was considered as outdated and showy. Quite only aged directors were wearing one. And Omega was really appreciated as a jubilée gift (in Switzerland, employees were often given an expensive watch after 20 or 25 years of duty in the same company)
@@elmago8268 if you’re not making that type of money then this is the wrong hobby for you, but for most of us a Rolex at retail is not a big deal of money.
@@frankv7068it’s more or less whether you wanna be their bitch and dance for them or pick someone who has stuff available and doesn’t discriminate. Imagine trying to give a company 10k for a watch and have these clowns tell you that you have to wait a year or two. They were sold in Costco’s before. Not only that, they have watches in stock in their safe, but they select who they want to sell to. The demand is there along with supply, but they control how much goes out like the diamond industry
2021 in the midst of Covid 19, went to a Rolex outlet in KLCC, Malaysia. The salesman was quite curteous though the Nepali guard gave me a funny look. I enquired about the Submariner and was told 'sorry no stock; there is a long waiting list'. Of course there were only a couple of units of other models available there. Since I was specifically after a Submariner, I didn't even bothered to look at them. I waited a couple of months and went back hoping that I may be in luck. Then the salesman told me the waiting list is actually 4 year long. Just a few doors away there is an Omega outlet. I just walked there and looked at Omega Seamaster 300M Nekton Edition and bought it on the spot. I am a senior citizen and am not going to wait 4 years to enjoy a good watch!
Rolex Daytona completely copied the Omega Speedmaster. Omega speedmaster is the first to put a Tachymeter outside the bezel, which the Dayton copied. Under Nasa stringent test, Omega speedmaster was the only one to pass, the Daytona failed. Rolex is only good at marketing, but in terms of quality and history, Rolex falls far behind Omega.
Omega has the fame, Rolex only has the name. When you don’t have any taste of your own and just want to fit in with the rest of the uncertain people in this world you buy Rolex. When you don’t care about what the other followers in this world think and you have taste of your own, you buy Omega. It takes a man to wear an Omega. It’s a never ending debate. Rolex lovers like Rolex and dislike Omega. Omega lovers do the opposite.
Two great watch makers but honestly speaking Rolex is a hyped piece of jewelry Omega is truly an innovative company. I personally wouldn’t buy a Rolex but that Omega Seamaster 300M ? will be mine for sure.
Thank you for making an extensive explanation and description of what both brands offer, now I am going to look for another video that makes me a comparison between which is the best purchase option.
I purchased an Omega Seamaster 300M blue quartz . Very content with it. Had to replace the battery once. I sold my Samsung watch (Apple watch) in place for a FitBit Charge 5. Still keep track of my sleep and activity and more importantly, have a wrist time for my mechanical watch. Fitbit band on the other wrist.
Personally I love the Rolex submariner and I would love to own one if I could ever afford one, however I will pick the semester over it partly because I already own one. But in all seriousness the Seamaster has a lot more going for it then the submariner in my opinion. Not only you getting the same amount of water resistance, you’re getting a helium escape valve, more overall adjustability with both a glide lock and a divers extension, a more decorated face with the laser engraved waves, please a date window that comes standard, magnetic resistance 15 times that of the milligauss, ease of availability and about as versatile as the submariner for less than half the cost.
you don't buy a watch because it has better spec but because it looks good on your wrist and it will last. Omega seamaster is good looking but a bit chunky
@@EternalInfusion Not in my experience. For me the omega Seamaster 300 professional fits me perfectly come on in is it gonna be the truck at all. My Seiko five is thicker than my omega on wrist.
I would only buy a watch if I like its design, the materials, the calibre is innovative, high tech, low uncertainty and I can buy it on a whim, whether it be directly from an AD or at an AD with the help of my friends collectors networks. The COSC, METAS, 1000 hours, etc... certifications do add a non negligible value to the instrument as I much prefer a certified instrument together with copies of its traceable certificates. I find that whilst so many people get obsessed by Rolex and Rolex only, there are a lot of other brands which are as good or better. One remark though, the Rolex use of 904L stainless steel is very much an advantage over the 316L which most watches companies use...
Just watching the prices of both great brands, Omega is a great buy. That being said, I don't think there is a better investment buy (at this moment) that would beat the steel Rolex Sub, black face with date. Just under 10K pre-owned and headed much higher sooner than later.
Owning both the Omega Speedmaster and the Rolex GMT Master II Root Beer is definitely having the best of both worlds! Each has its own legacy-the Speedmaster is iconic in the world of chronographs, while the Root Beer GMT shines in its realm of dual-timezone luxury. Both stand out in their respective categories, offering unique design and functionality that makes them top-tier in their fields. A true collector’s dream combo!
Modern Rolex carries a negative stigma about it associated with showoff douchebags, corporate cut throat psychopaths, sleazy salesmen, plus everyone asks "is that a real Rolex". It's no longer a brand for the everyday mature working man that aspired and saved his hard earned money to purchase a Rolex. The design on Rolex watches are dated, nothing classic or refined. It's a tool watch that tries to act like a luxury watch. No longer used for it's intended design. The Day Date, Date Just, Explorer II, and the Sea Dweller 43 (maybe the Explorer 39mm) are the last of the true Rolex tool/sport watches. Omega keeps up with the times and technology. If they want to they can always go back to more classic reissues with modern tech. No one will notice an Omega on the wrist. It won't attract negative attention if it's noticed. If anything I'm ok with a Speedmaster or an Explorer II if it were possible to find at a non-used market speculative inflated price. With the used prices and Rolex AD's treating old and new customers like crap. For non-hardcore watch guys like me. I think it's time to go above Rolex and look into JLC for the money.
Omega for me. Rolex is all about marketing. and if someone gave me one...idk...id probably just sell it for an Omega. I think its the bougie 'D-Bag' image Rolexs 'image' brings up in my mind. to each their own of course but I just never cared for the look/price of Rolex.
I want a rolex but my nickle allergy is keeping me away. Platinum and yellow gold rolex are out of my budget. Im looking at the omega $15K yellow gold and titanium wacth. Omega also has about 15 other titanium watches in titanium for nickle allergy suffer.
I'd rather have an Omega Seamaster that is worth less than I paid for it than the Rolex Batman that has doubled. Wait!!! What??? Keep reading the other comments and you'll see why the sarcasm.
Have both. There's no "better" brand. I have a 1967 Sub, but also a 1967 321 or also a 1967 Heuer. Is one better than the other ? No all three sing to me equally. Are there Rolexes, Omegas and Heuers that I don't like ? Sure.
Agreed. So much missed market share by Omega by not producing more of their sport models in smaller sizes. They are basically unwearable for women and half of men.
So bought the bond watch Ti bracelet and put it in my blue SMP and did the same for my previous models speedy and bought the new watches bracelet and wham. Done deal. Both are now wearable watches. The old bracelets the two modes offered suuuuucked
I also have both and Rolexes aren’t in the same league in terms of design. The Omegas are just so much more crisp. Rolex marketed itself well to have normal people overpaying for watches and yelling “I got a Rolex!” But their quality is not as good as Omega what so ever
Wonderful summary of both brands. Summary: Omega produce way too many options thus failing to reach the icon status of many Rolex models. Let's not forget that some Omegas are quartz. Personally I'll take Tudor over most Omega.
Incorrect.. Rolex is an Icon due to an artificial lack of supply and perception practice. None of the Current Rolexes deserve anything more than their Retail price. A rolex for $20k, thats a joke. Anyone with any semblance of watch making art would never spend that kind of money on a Rolex
@@AkshayRSingh Think "Porsche 911 consistency". I'm just saying that if Omega stopped d1cking around with their models and ceased quartz options then they would be far more desirable in my opinion. They could be such a strong brand with some careful restructuring. Same for TAG Heuer. In fact they should drop the TAG and rebrand as Heuer (like their reissues). Both Omega and Heuer should only produce mechanical pieces with minimum 100M WR priced carefully between Tudor and Rolex
@@markdegaute2125 whilst I agree with your analogy for Tag and how they need to get back to their Heuer heritage to really reincarnate themselves, I personally believe variety is actually great as then there's something for everyone. When you look at Rolex you don't see much if at all any organic evolution of the brand in their designs etc. I won't put them in the same league as Porsche as despite their barely changed design it's still pays homage to it's core characteristics whilst changing the stuff that really pushes it to the next level. Omega not only does that but also reinvents it's design character along with it. Rolex on the other hand simply is lazying on their laurels and that's a shame coz they can make decent watches.
@@AkshayRSingh fair enough. Personally I love the Speedy except the 50m WR. Love the DeVille except the 30m WR. Love the Seamaster except the skeleton hands. Love the Planet Ocean except the helium escape valve. Really love the Aqua Terra which is by far my favourite Omega but it disappoints me that they also make it in quartz. I'm a massive Tissot & Hamilton fan and of course they're the same company. Technologically speaking, many Omegas are incredible and I wish they would sort of the above issues.
Define “better. It sounds as if you’re sadly another poor soul who’s been sucked in by Rolex’s marketing strategies as there is very little to support Rolex being “better” than Omega. They’re just better at marketing their products which are no doubt helped by mass celebrity endorsement. If you compare the new 41mm Sub to the Master Chronometer Seamaster, I’m afraid Rolex will be coming second in terms of technological advancements. UA-cam is littered with experts saying the same thing. I have a Daytona and I have a Seamaster, but never have I looked at the Omega and wished I had another Rolex. And that’s 23 years after buying my first.
Ive got a Datejust and a Submariner, I've also got a moonwatch aling with a vintage omega. While the Omega s are vwry well made the quality of rhe Rolexes just beats them when you hold them in your hand
How is it better wen a Rolex you have to take for maintenance every 5 to 10yrs and loses its time. Omega can go 50yrs and still wont lose proper time and has gone thru more rugged testing and more certificates than rolex. wen rolex new that Omega was as expensive as rolex, rolex jacked the prices more to fool people into thinking they were more expensively made. i sold my presidential and get more compliments with my all 18k gold sedna seamaster from Omega from 2021. Omega is like Samsung , Rolex is like apple you pay more for the logo than actual real technology. but its ok now we know your still a child.
When Rolex shot up in price because of scarcity, Omega became the next Tudor, it's for people who can't afford Rolex grey prices and are not rich enough to impress the AD [laughing emoji] Omega fanboys save their money to buy a watch, Omega AD doesn't care, but Rolex AD does and now they're bitter to Rolex bec they got dissed for not being rich enough
Omega came first, they aren‘t a wannabe anything. Two great watchmakers, but the rolex image makes it a no-go for me. Too many insecure idiots buy rolexes. Omega has more class.
Omega forever. 👍👍👍
Agreed
Nope
@@creativeme6963may I ask why you feel that way ?
I honestly love my omega speedmaster it’s reliable and it was not to expensive compared to Rolex. I like rolexes but I am going to always stay with omega for ever !
Never mind I actually like omega and Rolex the same so I will stay with both
@@user-eb7ns2or1j glad u came back & cleared things up for us
@@ShittyMcPoopyBalls lol
@@user-eb7ns2or1j 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Omega's moon watches are just incredible like the one with a real piece of meteorite in it and the white one. Honestly they worth that price.
when rolex prices were about the same as omega, rolex decided to increase the prices to make the watches feel more luxurious.
Exact. As a Swiss citizen I can confirm. 20-25 years ago Rolex was considered as outdated and showy. Quite only aged directors were wearing one. And Omega was really appreciated as a jubilée gift (in Switzerland, employees were often given an expensive watch after 20 or 25 years of duty in the same company)
You can’t control demand, the people want Rolex. It’s simple economics
@@frankv7068 You think buying a rolex is like buying a cake at your local bakery? 😂😂
@@elmago8268 if you’re not making that type of money then this is the wrong hobby for you, but for most of us a Rolex at retail is not a big deal of money.
@@frankv7068it’s more or less whether you wanna be their bitch and dance for them or pick someone who has stuff available and doesn’t discriminate. Imagine trying to give a company 10k for a watch and have these clowns tell you that you have to wait a year or two. They were sold in Costco’s before. Not only that, they have watches in stock in their safe, but they select who they want to sell to. The demand is there along with supply, but they control how much goes out like the diamond industry
If you can get Rolex for retail, hell yeah
If you're human, be happy with your great Omega
2021 in the midst of Covid 19, went to a Rolex outlet in KLCC, Malaysia. The salesman was quite curteous though the Nepali guard gave me a funny look. I enquired about the Submariner and was told 'sorry no stock; there is a long waiting list'. Of course there were only a couple of units of other models available there. Since I was specifically after a Submariner, I didn't even bothered to look at them.
I waited a couple of months and went back hoping that I may be in luck. Then the salesman told me the waiting list is actually 4 year long.
Just a few doors away there is an Omega outlet. I just walked there and looked at Omega Seamaster 300M Nekton Edition and bought it on the spot. I am a senior citizen and am not going to wait 4 years to enjoy a good watch!
Rolex Daytona completely copied the Omega Speedmaster. Omega speedmaster is the first to put a Tachymeter outside the bezel, which the Dayton copied. Under Nasa stringent test, Omega speedmaster was the only one to pass, the Daytona failed. Rolex is only good at marketing, but in terms of quality and history, Rolex falls far behind Omega.
Rolex knows how to sell watches whereas omega knows how to make them …
I love them both but Omega just looks more interesting IMO.
Omega has the fame, Rolex only has the name. When you don’t have any taste of your own and just want to fit in with the rest of the uncertain people in this world you buy Rolex. When you don’t care about what the other followers in this world think and you have taste of your own, you buy Omega. It takes a man to wear an Omega.
It’s a never ending debate. Rolex lovers like Rolex and dislike Omega. Omega lovers do the opposite.
Lol @ it takes a man to wear an omega !, if you don’t care what others think you’d buy something other than. Rolex or Omega
Two great watch makers but honestly speaking Rolex is a hyped piece of jewelry Omega is truly an innovative company. I personally wouldn’t buy a Rolex but that Omega Seamaster 300M ? will be mine for sure.
Thank you for making an extensive explanation and description of what both brands offer, now I am going to look for another video that makes me a comparison between which is the best purchase option.
Omega👍👍
I will take the Speedy, the sub, and the railmaster.
Less than 1 minute in,seriously good imagery!
Would rather have that No Time to Die Seamaster than any Rolex
The Omega Planet Ocean Seamaster is the finest every day watch in the world.
If i got a dollar for every Rolex vs Omega video or discussion, I'd probably be able to buy another Omega, or Rolex for myself.
I gotta get one rolley!! but I’m thinking omega got more style and pop!!!!
I purchased an Omega Seamaster 300M blue quartz . Very content with it. Had to replace the battery once.
I sold my Samsung watch (Apple watch) in place for a FitBit Charge 5.
Still keep track of my sleep and activity and more importantly, have a wrist time for my mechanical watch. Fitbit band on the other wrist.
Personally I love the Rolex submariner and I would love to own one if I could ever afford one, however I will pick the semester over it partly because I already own one. But in all seriousness the Seamaster has a lot more going for it then the submariner in my opinion. Not only you getting the same amount of water resistance, you’re getting a helium escape valve, more overall adjustability with both a glide lock and a divers extension, a more decorated face with the laser engraved waves, please a date window that comes standard, magnetic resistance 15 times that of the milligauss, ease of availability and about as versatile as the submariner for less than half the cost.
you don't buy a watch because it has better spec but because it looks good on your wrist and it will last. Omega seamaster is good looking but a bit chunky
@@EternalInfusion Not in my experience. For me the omega Seamaster 300 professional fits me perfectly come on in is it gonna be the truck at all. My Seiko five is thicker than my omega on wrist.
I would only buy a watch if I like its design, the materials, the calibre is innovative, high tech, low uncertainty and I can buy it on a whim, whether it be directly from an AD or at an AD with the help of my friends collectors networks. The COSC, METAS, 1000 hours, etc... certifications do add a non negligible value to the instrument as I much prefer a certified instrument together with copies of its traceable certificates. I find that whilst so many people get obsessed by Rolex and Rolex only, there are a lot of other brands which are as good or better. One remark though, the Rolex use of 904L stainless steel is very much an advantage over the 316L which most watches companies use...
One thing you get with the Omega is way more $$ left over for Tugs from Anthony at TPG
I love my Omega but I still aspire to purchase a sport model Rolex one day.
Sums this up nicely
Me too….however, I refuse to pay scalper prices….so, Rolex is out.
@@theshamelesswatchchannel6815 just hit up your AD to get on a list. Took 18 months for me to get the Datejust I wanted
Just watching the prices of both great brands, Omega is a great buy. That being said, I don't think there is a better investment buy (at this moment) that would beat the steel Rolex Sub, black face with date. Just under 10K pre-owned and headed much higher sooner than later.
Rolex is jewellery. Omega makes watch. Cant compare them
Spot on I think. Rolex becoming a very expensive sheeple fashion victim accessory
@@ehe-ukI wanna disagree but I can’t .
As an owner of both (Omega Speedmaster & Rolex gmt master 2 rootbeer ) I must say both stand their own way and best in their particular field
Owning both the Omega Speedmaster and the Rolex GMT Master II Root Beer is definitely having the best of both worlds! Each has its own legacy-the Speedmaster is iconic in the world of chronographs, while the Root Beer GMT shines in its realm of dual-timezone luxury. Both stand out in their respective categories, offering unique design and functionality that makes them top-tier in their fields. A true collector’s dream combo!
That Aqua Terra though….😍
Modern Rolex carries a negative stigma about it associated with showoff douchebags, corporate cut throat psychopaths, sleazy salesmen, plus everyone asks "is that a real Rolex". It's no longer a brand for the everyday mature working man that aspired and saved his hard earned money to purchase a Rolex. The design on Rolex watches are dated, nothing classic or refined. It's a tool watch that tries to act like a luxury watch. No longer used for it's intended design. The Day Date, Date Just, Explorer II, and the Sea Dweller 43 (maybe the Explorer 39mm) are the last of the true Rolex tool/sport watches. Omega keeps up with the times and technology. If they want to they can always go back to more classic reissues with modern tech. No one will notice an Omega on the wrist. It won't attract negative attention if it's noticed. If anything I'm ok with a Speedmaster or an Explorer II if it were possible to find at a non-used market speculative inflated price. With the used prices and Rolex AD's treating old and new customers like crap. For non-hardcore watch guys like me. I think it's time to go above Rolex and look into JLC for the money.
Omega for me. Rolex is all about marketing. and if someone gave me one...idk...id probably just sell it for an Omega. I think its the bougie 'D-Bag' image Rolexs 'image' brings up in my mind. to each their own of course but I just never cared for the look/price of Rolex.
I own both brands and they both have pros and cons . Love them both companies for different reasons
Each brand definitely has its unique strengths and qualities. It’s awesome to appreciate both for what they bring to the table. 🔥
Omega watches are so much more fun. I find Rolex watches to be pretty bland.
The only reason Rolex is famous is because of Paul Newman (a 2-bit actor)
I dont have much money. But if i can choose i will choose rolex because of 2nd value. Thanks
Fair enough
Wat about explorer ??
Omega is Wolf. I love Omega means eternal.
Omega wins
Only problem I have with omega is that they make too many different models and different colors. Becoming like Tag
Sounds like you just don't know how to make a decision. Not sure why you would knock a brand for an abundance of options.
Omega
I love Rolex, but there is no way it is 2x the watch vs omega in terms of pricing…
Thanks for the content, but please do not speak so fast. It's very distracting.
The debate is kinda dumb tbh. Buy whatever you think looks better, the differences in tech aren’t gonna be big enough to matter for the most part
I want a rolex but my nickle allergy is keeping me away. Platinum and yellow gold rolex are out of my budget. Im looking at the omega $15K yellow gold and titanium wacth. Omega also has about 15 other titanium watches in titanium for nickle allergy suffer.
Can you compare the grand seiko. Thanks
"The Seamaster was released in 1957" That's incorrect, the Seamaster was released in 1948...!
Great catch! However, we were referring to the release of the first Seamaster 300, a true diver’s watch making its debut in 1957.
Omega’s latest Swatch release kind of makes Rolex look a bit old and fuddy duddy and completely overpriced haha.
milgauss is a joke. omega is way better
I'd rather have an Omega Seamaster that is worth less than I paid for it than the Rolex Batman that has doubled. Wait!!! What??? Keep reading the other comments and you'll see why the sarcasm.
How’s that going for ya?
I have never seen an omega watch and go, “Ooohh! That is a beautiful watch! I gotta have that!” 🤷♂️
Have both. There's no "better" brand. I have a 1967 Sub, but also a 1967 321 or also a 1967 Heuer. Is one better than the other ? No all three sing to me equally. Are there Rolexes, Omegas and Heuers that I don't like ? Sure.
Ik ice both brands but prefer Omega.
Omegas are great value, but for me (as a general rule) Omegas are too big for me and Rolex’s bracelets are better.
Agreed. So much missed market share by Omega by not producing more of their sport models in smaller sizes. They are basically unwearable for women and half of men.
So bought the bond watch Ti bracelet and put it in my blue SMP and did the same for my previous models speedy and bought the new watches bracelet and wham. Done deal. Both are now wearable watches. The old bracelets the two modes offered suuuuucked
Omega needs to work on their marketing strategy!
Beautiful, but too expensive.
Here for the Omega owners hating on Rolex but everyone knowing deep down inside Rolex is #1 and Omega #2 (and I own both).
Would you elaborate why Rolex is number 1 ? please be factual. We are all waiting.
I also have both and Rolexes aren’t in the same league in terms of design. The Omegas are just so much more crisp. Rolex marketed itself well to have normal people overpaying for watches and yelling “I got a Rolex!” But their quality is not as good as Omega what so ever
Just reading specs. Not much insight.
Just for a design - Rolex. But love Omega watches.
NTTD thumbnail, and no where in video. Fail.
Is that a real Rolex? I say to myself
Seamaster debuted in 1948
Omega owners always beating on Rolex owners (not the reverse) yet those who own both more than often favour their Rolex.
And I found that Rolex owners are usually the more arrogant bunch. And some that own both more than often prefer their Omega!
Have both and favor Omega, this is a huge lie
My case rests... Rolex owners called arrogant and liars yet no hate given.
Omega.....
🚀
Wonderful summary of both brands. Summary: Omega produce way too many options thus failing to reach the icon status of many Rolex models. Let's not forget that some Omegas are quartz. Personally I'll take Tudor over most Omega.
The only nice omega is the aqua terra, the rest just don't look nice. I'll take Longines over most Omega.
Incorrect.. Rolex is an Icon due to an artificial lack of supply and perception practice. None of the Current Rolexes deserve anything more than their Retail price. A rolex for $20k, thats a joke. Anyone with any semblance of watch making art would never spend that kind of money on a Rolex
@@AkshayRSingh Think "Porsche 911 consistency". I'm just saying that if Omega stopped d1cking around with their models and ceased quartz options then they would be far more desirable in my opinion. They could be such a strong brand with some careful restructuring. Same for TAG Heuer. In fact they should drop the TAG and rebrand as Heuer (like their reissues). Both Omega and Heuer should only produce mechanical pieces with minimum 100M WR priced carefully between Tudor and Rolex
@@markdegaute2125 whilst I agree with your analogy for Tag and how they need to get back to their Heuer heritage to really reincarnate themselves, I personally believe variety is actually great as then there's something for everyone. When you look at Rolex you don't see much if at all any organic evolution of the brand in their designs etc. I won't put them in the same league as Porsche as despite their barely changed design it's still pays homage to it's core characteristics whilst changing the stuff that really pushes it to the next level. Omega not only does that but also reinvents it's design character along with it. Rolex on the other hand simply is lazying on their laurels and that's a shame coz they can make decent watches.
@@AkshayRSingh fair enough. Personally I love the Speedy except the 50m WR. Love the DeVille except the 30m WR. Love the Seamaster except the skeleton hands. Love the Planet Ocean except the helium escape valve. Really love the Aqua Terra which is by far my favourite Omega but it disappoints me that they also make it in quartz. I'm a massive Tissot & Hamilton fan and of course they're the same company. Technologically speaking, many Omegas are incredible and I wish they would sort of the above issues.
You speak too fast
JFK wore an Omega. Donald trump wore a Rolex. Nuff said. Rolex has become an overinflated chav icon.
I hate the Rolex eye
Rolex ( Rolls Royce)
Omega (Bentley)
Rolex-mercedes
Omega-audi
This guy talks WAY too slow y’all. A real turn off.
Rolex is shit compared to Omega lol.
After I got a Rolex Catalog..Game over! nothing comes close to a Rolex
Rolex blows poor omega out the water.
I've had both, but Rolex is better than omega, if you buy a omega you will wish you had Rolex
Define “better. It sounds as if you’re sadly another poor soul who’s been sucked in by Rolex’s marketing strategies as there is very little to support Rolex being “better” than Omega. They’re just better at marketing their products which are no doubt helped by mass celebrity endorsement.
If you compare the new 41mm Sub to the Master Chronometer Seamaster, I’m afraid Rolex will be coming second in terms of technological advancements. UA-cam is littered with experts saying the same thing. I have a Daytona and I have a Seamaster, but never have I looked at the Omega and wished I had another Rolex. And that’s 23 years after buying my first.
@@IrishScribbler completely agree
I own 13 omega watches and one Rolex bluesy, soon I will sell my Rolex and buy another omega watch
Ive got a Datejust and a Submariner, I've also got a moonwatch aling with a vintage omega. While the Omega s are vwry well made the quality of rhe Rolexes just beats them when you hold them in your hand
How is it better wen a Rolex you have to take for maintenance every 5 to 10yrs and loses its time. Omega can go 50yrs and still wont lose proper time and has gone thru more rugged testing and more certificates than rolex. wen rolex new that Omega was as expensive as rolex, rolex jacked the prices more to fool people into thinking they were more expensively made. i sold my presidential and get more compliments with my all 18k gold sedna seamaster from Omega from 2021. Omega is like Samsung , Rolex is like apple you pay more for the logo than actual real technology. but its ok now we know your still a child.
When Rolex shot up in price because of scarcity, Omega became the next Tudor, it's for people who can't afford Rolex grey prices and are not rich enough to impress the AD [laughing emoji] Omega fanboys save their money to buy a watch, Omega AD doesn't care, but Rolex AD does and now they're bitter to Rolex bec they got dissed for not being rich enough
Two overpriced watches with same movements 😅
Rolex .... anytime 😀👍
Can’t compare omegas to Rolex’s in any section of watch making
Omega always wanted to be a wannabe Rolex .....
what are you talking about
You know nothing lol
Omega .... anytime😀👍
Can’t compare Rolex to Omega’s in any section of watch making
Rolex always wanted to be a wannabe Omega .....
Remus Wheeler
Hahahaha
The world knows the truth
Omega came first, they aren‘t a wannabe anything. Two great watchmakers, but the rolex image makes it a no-go for me. Too many insecure idiots buy rolexes. Omega has more class.
Rolex is Rolls Royce of watches
What about Patek, audermars piguet ? Rolex is a BWW and Omega is an Mercedes