Thank you for the presentation about Kurt Lewins theory of change. This presentation is very helpful and you weren't rushing through it which makes it clear and understandable. Thank you
I do like ch6anges but in better not in worse. And yes in refreeze the best is to walk away if you as an individual dont feel like contributing or having an effective work for the new implementations. It is just waste of time to be somewhere where you dont want to be. The long time managers that were not able to provide the employees with motivation and all the other HRM staff will not be willing to continue more as the employees got tired, unhappy and they want to walk away from that environment who bring them only harm both physical and psychological. That is the point in the 3C in busniess.
Everyone likes changes for better. Nobody likes changes for worse. The problem we face as Project or Change Managers is often to convince people that changes which will have a net benefit to them are changes for the better. Loss aversion means that eople see a small down-side and that has a disproportionate impact on their mental assessment of the impact of the change. What is '3C in business'? I do not recognize that term.
@@Onlinepmcourses you can convince anyone when u did not understood collaboration. The ideal of dreaming of past is a mental model that have to be pursued for seniors who can not forecast the profits. Changing management is about that time when you have understood that no one wants to work for you! When u have showed your values than is not like you are valueted more in the future . You build up your own profits on peoples poverty. Than you can of course convince your self what you want to convince others .
Kurt Lewin’s Freeze Phases model is simple to understand and will help you think about how to create effective change.
Thank you for the presentation about Kurt Lewins theory of change. This presentation is very helpful and you weren't rushing through it which makes it clear and understandable. Thank you
You're very welcome! Glad it was helpful.
Im #100🎉🎉🎉 glad to watch you cover this topic. Always great to hear your lessons.
Thank you very much for watching and commenting!
Another timely video for myself @Michiel Clayton. Thank You.👍
You're welcome, Hank. Glad it helps.
Very helpful. Thanks Mike
You're welcome.
thanks man this was very helpful
My pleasure.
❤
🙏
Thanks
You are very welcome, Michael - and thank you very much for your generous gift.
I do like ch6anges but in better not in worse. And yes in refreeze the best is to walk away if you as an individual dont feel like contributing or having an effective work for the new implementations. It is just waste of time to be somewhere where you dont want to be. The long time managers that were not able to provide the employees with motivation and all the other HRM staff will not be willing to continue more as the employees got tired, unhappy and they want to walk away from that environment who bring them only harm both physical and psychological. That is the point in the 3C in busniess.
Everyone likes changes for better. Nobody likes changes for worse. The problem we face as Project or Change Managers is often to convince people that changes which will have a net benefit to them are changes for the better. Loss aversion means that eople see a small down-side and that has a disproportionate impact on their mental assessment of the impact of the change.
What is '3C in business'? I do not recognize that term.
@@Onlinepmcourses you can convince anyone when u did not understood collaboration. The ideal of dreaming of past is a mental model that have to be pursued for seniors who can not forecast the profits. Changing management is about that time when you have understood that no one wants to work for you! When u have showed your values than is not like you are valueted more in the future . You build up your own profits on peoples poverty. Than you can of course convince your self what you want to convince others .
@@Potencyfunction What?
please tell me why "common sense" is declared as "incredible scientific innovation" ?
I'm not with you, I'm afraid. What common sense is declared as 'incredible scientific innovation'?