Hey this is a re-uploaded version of this video as the first one contained a couple of errors which I wanted to fix. Hopefully this is basically free of errors now, but let me know if you spot anything. Also what do you think of the funny bits? Yay or nooo?
Defenetly yay but I also like the more serious style. Maby you can use both depending on the topic of the video. Also I realy likes the sience round ups. I would love one about last year.
I really do not like the funny bits. One of the reasons I liked your channel was because it was so technical and in depth. Most people seem to like it though, so you should probably keep them in, but make them a bit less frequent please.
Definitely not a fan of the "humour" bits. It doesn't really feel all that natural and therefore kind of kills the enjoyment of watching one of your videos - at least for me.
Good afternoon sir! When you started off by saying you`re going to teach me how to read Feynman diagrams i paused your video, chuckled and said to myself .. "You can try" ... BUT i have to confess you made me understand. When i got towards the end and you proposed the specific question "what force is mediating this interaction" .. Gluon - Strong Force!
The last diagram looks like a strong proton-nucleon interaction. So basically what makes nuclei stick together. The down and up quark exchange can be viewd as an exchange of a virtual pion. So its more a "remnant" strong interaction, since its not directly transferred via gluons. Great video! Edit: typo
@@SirArthurTheGreat The strong force is mediated by the exchange of gluons. So all hadrons are bound system of the strong force and the composites (quarks) carry a color charge and can hence directly exchange gluons. Nucleons on the other hands are already made up from quarks and are neutral in terms of color charge. So nucleons cannot exchange gluons to bind together into nuclei. But instead they exchange color neutral pions as a force carrier. These pions arise as kind of residual effect of the inner dynamics of the nucleon. Very similar to the Van der Waals forces between electrically neutral atoms and molecules. For more information check out this paragraph: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_force#The_nuclear_force_as_a_residual_of_the_strong_force
It confuses the heck with me reading the arrow of antiparticles in reverse. But down is -1/3, pion is down -1/3-2/3 antiup or -1. Subtract -1 to -1/3 is an up quark which is +2/3. Add -1 to the up 2/3 to make 1/3, an up quark. And the gluons stick it all together. But why, i guess thats your explanation of how nuclei are bonded but why do neutrons and protons swap?
@@jorgepeterbarton Not sure if I understand your question correctly, but in the example the proton and neutron swap since the exchange a pi^-, which has a negative charge. Due to the pion exchange one valence quark in the proton and neutron changes its flavour and hence the proton becomes a neutron and vice verca.
7:37 - The last Feynman Diagram depicts an Strong nuclear interaction between an Neutron (comprised of Up-Down-Down Quarks) and an Proton (comprised of Up-Down-Up quarks). In this quantum process, the initial Neutron (bottom-left of the Time-Space (TS) graph; T is Y-axis and Space is X-axis) is transformed into an Proton (upper-left of the TS graph) and the initial Proton (bottom-right of the TS graph) is transformed into an Neutron (upper-right of the TS graph). The gluons are always made of pairs (Color-G and anticolor-B or -Red, or Color-R and anticolor-G or -Color- B...). So the gluons (Strong force gauge bósons) change the individual color-charge of the quarks inside an NUCLEON - PROTON or NEUTRON, (in an dynamic; never-ending manner); BUT is by the process of creation and annihilation of PIONS (in this case, symbol-Pi -1; made always by a pair of quark anti-quark (both FERMIONS) and depicted as crossed solid lines), drawn in the MIDDLE of the TS graph as crossed lines that makes possible for different NUCLEONS to BE HELD TOGETHER by the STRONG NUCLEAR INTERACTIONS...(in this case by the STRONG RESIDUAL NUCLEAR INTERACTION)! GREAT VíDEO DoS! For more details: ua-cam.com/video/FoR3hq5b5yE/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/iIWTRwJlrGo/v-deo.html
at 7:39 the reaction is mediated by the strong force (cus gluons) and it describes an up quark (bottom right) spontaneously turning into: an anti-up quark + down quark, turning into a down quark. At the same exact time a down quark (bottom left) interacts with the anti-up quark + down quark, turning into an up quark. This can be thought of as: u (bottom right) --> anti-u + d + d (top right) and d (bottom left)+ d + anti-u --> u (top left) happening at the same time, each on its own breaks conservation laws but when put together: u + d --> u + d it obeys those laws, and its almost as if the up and down quarks "switched places" You can also rewrite the equations, substituting (d + anti-up) with (negative pion): u (from bottom right) --> negative pion + d (top right) and d (from bottom left) + negative pion --> u (top right) both happening simultaneously. If you, dear fellow commenter, want to derive this yourself, you can write the feynman diagrams starting from the bottom right up quark ending with the top right down quark, and the same starting from the bottom left down quark ending with the top left up quark. Then you can combine the two feynman diagrams and you'll see the common pion arise between the two.
Excellent video. Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video. A must see for everyone interested in science, and most everyone not particularly interested in science. Many thanks.
I don't know quantum physics, but from what you described in the video: The last feynman diagram looks like a neutron and a proton exchanging and up quark for a down quark, turning the proton into a neutron and the neutron into a proton? The gluons involved makes it a strong force interaction?
I also don't know mu h about quantum physics but for I know charge of up and down quark So charge of gluon came as 4/3 And charge of that orange* down quark came -5/3 But gluon isn't supposed to have charge I am able to understand this is strong force interaction But I also know charge is conserved
@@aryanbajaj4337 If I'm correct, the gluon didn't change the charge in the system. The yellow down change his movement because of the gluon "discharge" (as in the electrons and photon in the beginning) and then it happened again with another gluon. The first gluon became an up quark and anti up (charged add up to 0) and then the anti up and other up became the second gluon. So not charge was added to the system or taken from it. Hope I help a little!
The last Feynman diagram shows a down quark changed its colour charge and direction by the momentum of the emitted gluon . This gluon decayed into up quark and anti up quark then the up quark change the first nutron into proton then the anti up quark join the up quark from the other proton to make a gluon that changes the direction and the colour charge of the first down quark which changed the second proton into nutron
Thank you for revising the concept. We were taught this around the age of 10 and there us gonna be a test about this in our school after summer (im 14 now)
Anti-matter is moving forward in time...but we are moving forward in time too. Does that mean that we can't see anti-matter because it and us are moving forward in time? So if you took time out of the equation, then wouldn't you be able to see anti-matter?
Hey, when the down quark turns into an up quark and the up quark turns into a down quark, is the electrical charge of the quarks transferred by w-w+ bosons? Also, after the up quark turns into a down quark and the up quark turns into a down quark, where do the electric charges come from? Does w- w+ come from bosons or is it a phenomenon arising from the nature of quarks?
7:33 I actually took the time to parse out what was going on in this model and it was in this moment where I exclaimed "I'm starting to comprehend quantum mechanics! Holy Sh**!"
7:30 Question: What is the diagram depicting and which force is mediating this interaction? The fact that the arrows at the top point in opposite directions kinda puzzle me, but I'd say it's the formation of deuterium through the strong nuclear force. I'm 99% sure the strong force is responsible for this interaction, but only 5% sure about what the diagram is actually showing 🥲.
So if antimatter goes backwards in time and exchanges with a particle of matter, does anti matter change the course of time? say like a potential future from when in time the antimatter came from?
I'm gonna say it's a strong force interaction (gluons carry the strong force at 3:14), and it appears to be a neutron becoming a proton and a proton becoming a neutron in tandem. I seem to remember in one of your videos that neutrons are less stable than protons, so I assume the initial driving force is the left neutron's potential to decay into a proton. This is shown with the down-quark emitting the gluon (as it gets attracted to the proton on the right, I'm guessing). That gluon then splits into an up-quark and anti-up-quark (obeying the laws of conservation of something?). That up-quark goes back with his buddies to become a proton, and the anti-up-quark gets attracted to an up-quark in the other proton, they annihilate and become a gluon, in the opposite process of what created the anti-up-quark in the first place. All the while, we got this down-quark moving toward this proton, probably missing it's gluon energy, then here this gluon comes, just in time to put it all together into a neutron. Seeing as how this is protons and neutrons, I can only assume this takes place in the nuclei of atoms.
Could someone explain how the diagram in the thumbnail is valid? I thought the diagram violates conservation of charge because the initial state has charge +1, the intermediate has 1 due to the W boson, and the final has a charge of -1 due to the electron. In class we draw a vertical line before or after each vertex and ensure that at every moment in time, the total charge is equal
Question: Why would drawing Feynman diagrams with time going up be the most common way? In physics, time is usually the independent variable (going horizontally) and position is the dependent variable (going vertically) so why would they switch it in this one instance? I don’t know enough about this, so it might not be just one instance and I probably don’t have enough info to assert this. I just don’t understand why basic depictions wouldn’t be homogenous across all of physics.
Hi - I'm thinking that the diagram is n+p elastic scattering where the n & p exchange into each other. I'm not a theoretical physicist (I'm a Medical Physicist); but it appears that the standard model rules and particles keep increasing. This reminds me of the past Earth-centered model of the universe, where epicycles upon epicycles must be added to make it work. We do not have enough understanding of the universe to make it work either. Cheers! - Tim
What if I reverse the direction of time for beta emission? Do I only need to change directions of the arrows or do I also need to swap the positions of the neutron and the proton?
I think the last diagram shows a strong interaction between a proton and a neutron, where n0 becomes p+ and p+ becomes n0. The n0 down quark emits a gluon and then absorbs one emitted by the p+ up quark. The p+ up quark emits a gluon, becomes an anti-up quark, and then absorbs the gluon emitted by the n0 down quark. In doing so, it becomes a up quark again. Can someone correct me, please, if something is wrong. I am a student in 9th grade, so we do not learn this in school and I can not ask during the lesson. Also thank you for the great video.
Hi all I can't seem to find the next video in the series; the one about the conservation rules. If someone could point me in the right direction would be much appreciated
I frickin love all the physics! 7:35 God I hope I'm not wrong about this... Was so hard to not look at comments before writing this lol Looks to me like the strong force bringing a proton and neutron together to make a hydrogen nuclei?
apparently not early enough, since if you were early enough that means you would have watched the first upload with errors, and while making a comment here 4 minutes after this video was uploaded, you would have said something about seeing the first upload of this video
@@gaminghunt5837 why are you say it as if I don't know that ? have you like read what I said ? I think it explicitly shows that I am and was more than aware that this was a re-upload :)
Is it the strong force holding a proton and neutron together in the nucleus through a strong force interaction but in doing so they technically swap places?
The first part of the sentence is right. Yes, the strong force holds the nucleus together. No, they don't "swap places". There is ofc other forces in play though, so it's not the only force inside of a nucleus
Does the mystery diagram depict how a proton and a neutron, through the use of the strong force, exchange quarks: the original proton receiving a down quark to become a neutron and the original neutron receiving an up quark which was turned to anti-matter before reverting back to matter to introduce itself into the original neutron to convert it into a proton?
At 5 50 in the top left there is a depiction of a weak interaction, but I am confused to as why the exchange particle is W- boson and not a W+ boson, as the diagram seems to depict a beta + decay
it’s an interaction that can be found in supernovae: an electron and a proton combine to form a neutron and an electron neutrino in a sort of reverse beta decay. the electron is giving up its charge in the form of w- turning it into an electron neutrino, which then neutralises the proton’s charge to make a neutron.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey this is a re-uploaded version of this video as the first one contained a couple of errors which I wanted to fix. Hopefully this is basically free of errors now, but let me know if you spot anything. Also what do you think of the funny bits? Yay or nooo?
gotta get the cheese collection right, I understand
Definite yay
Defenetly yay but I also like the more serious style. Maby you can use both depending on the topic of the video.
Also I realy likes the sience round ups. I would love one about last year.
I really do not like the funny bits. One of the reasons I liked your channel was because it was so technical and in depth. Most people seem to like it though, so you should probably keep them in, but make them a bit less frequent please.
Definitely not a fan of the "humour" bits. It doesn't really feel all that natural and therefore kind of kills the enjoyment of watching one of your videos - at least for me.
Good afternoon sir! When you started off by saying you`re going to teach me how to read Feynman diagrams i paused your video, chuckled and said to myself .. "You can try" ... BUT i have to confess you made me understand. When i got towards the end and you proposed the specific question "what force is mediating this interaction" .. Gluon - Strong Force!
Brilliant! :D
The last diagram looks like a strong proton-nucleon interaction. So basically what makes nuclei stick together. The down and up quark exchange can be viewd as an exchange of a virtual pion. So its more a "remnant" strong interaction, since its not directly transferred via gluons. Great video!
Edit: typo
What do you mean by remnant strong interaction?
@@SirArthurTheGreat The strong force is mediated by the exchange of gluons. So all hadrons are bound system of the strong force and the composites (quarks) carry a color charge and can hence directly exchange gluons. Nucleons on the other hands are already made up from quarks and are neutral in terms of color charge. So nucleons cannot exchange gluons to bind together into nuclei. But instead they exchange color neutral pions as a force carrier. These pions arise as kind of residual effect of the inner dynamics of the nucleon. Very similar to the Van der Waals forces between electrically neutral atoms and molecules. For more information check out this paragraph: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_force#The_nuclear_force_as_a_residual_of_the_strong_force
It confuses the heck with me reading the arrow of antiparticles in reverse.
But down is -1/3, pion is down -1/3-2/3 antiup or -1. Subtract -1 to -1/3 is an up quark which is +2/3. Add -1 to the up 2/3 to make 1/3, an up quark. And the gluons stick it all together.
But why, i guess thats your explanation of how nuclei are bonded but why do neutrons and protons swap?
@@jorgepeterbarton Not sure if I understand your question correctly, but in the example the proton and neutron swap since the exchange a pi^-, which has a negative charge. Due to the pion exchange one valence quark in the proton and neutron changes its flavour and hence the proton becomes a neutron and vice verca.
So this is the interaction that binds the protons and neutrons in an atom? The interaction that makes the most of the mass?
7:37 - The last Feynman Diagram depicts an Strong nuclear interaction between an Neutron (comprised of Up-Down-Down Quarks) and an Proton (comprised of Up-Down-Up quarks). In this quantum process, the initial Neutron (bottom-left of the Time-Space (TS) graph; T is Y-axis and Space is X-axis) is transformed into an Proton (upper-left of the TS graph) and the initial Proton (bottom-right of the TS graph) is transformed into an Neutron (upper-right of the TS graph). The gluons are always made of pairs (Color-G and anticolor-B or -Red, or Color-R and anticolor-G or -Color- B...). So the gluons (Strong force gauge bósons) change the individual color-charge of the quarks inside an NUCLEON - PROTON or NEUTRON, (in an dynamic; never-ending manner); BUT is by the process of creation and annihilation of PIONS (in this case, symbol-Pi -1; made always by a pair of quark anti-quark (both FERMIONS) and depicted as crossed solid lines), drawn in the MIDDLE of the TS graph as crossed lines that makes possible for different NUCLEONS to BE HELD TOGETHER by the STRONG NUCLEAR INTERACTIONS...(in this case by the STRONG RESIDUAL NUCLEAR INTERACTION)!
GREAT VíDEO DoS!
For more details:
ua-cam.com/video/FoR3hq5b5yE/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/iIWTRwJlrGo/v-deo.html
i hate when i get time backwards
What like US time format mm:ss:hh ? 😉
8:00 probably the nicest "zoomed in" depiction of the residual strong force I've seen.
If Iam right you are right too :D
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction#/media/File:Nuclear_Force_anim_smaller.gif
Then you'll love this one.
Dear, Dominic
Thank you for this amazing topic
It really drives me towards Quantum Physics. As a high school student,I am very grateful to you Dominic
keep it up mate, it's going to be hard if you want to follow the path of a theorist. But if study hard enough, you will like it
Thank you
I surely will
I know quantum physics is an addictive field.
@Some Guy More like BOTH
I feel impressed by these incredible guys who do a lot of efforts to try to explain us deep ideas of Physics. Big Thank You Very Much !
Love the art, animations, and inclusion of every particle in the standard model, very cool
I read that as "antimation" been trying to understand feynman diagrams for a tad too long 😂
Explained so interestingly and simply only within 9 minutes.
That's really appreciating
Thank you for working on the corrections. Really great video!
I love how you explain this to layman audience. I like how go slowly and explain them.
"That's all photons, _they're wiggly_ "
at 7:39 the reaction is mediated by the strong force (cus gluons) and it describes an up quark (bottom right) spontaneously turning into: an anti-up quark + down quark, turning into a down quark. At the same exact time a down quark (bottom left) interacts with the anti-up quark + down quark, turning into an up quark.
This can be thought of as: u (bottom right) --> anti-u + d + d (top right) and d (bottom left)+ d + anti-u --> u (top left) happening at the same time, each on its own breaks conservation laws but when put together: u + d --> u + d it obeys those laws, and its almost as if the up and down quarks "switched places"
You can also rewrite the equations, substituting (d + anti-up) with (negative pion): u (from bottom right) --> negative pion + d (top right) and d (from bottom left) + negative pion --> u (top right) both happening simultaneously. If you, dear fellow commenter, want to derive this yourself, you can write the feynman diagrams starting from the bottom right up quark ending with the top right down quark, and the same starting from the bottom left down quark ending with the top left up quark. Then you can combine the two feynman diagrams and you'll see the common pion arise between the two.
Have you uploaded the second part to this? Can't wait to learn more! You're doing great work m8
2:02 This is just the best explanation of the standard model ever!
Welcome back! :D
Thanks for the explanation, my professor just expected me to know this lol. Also loved that you explained the basics first. Tysm!!
Lw becoming one of my fav science channels for your realistic approaches.
I thought I'll give up on passing Elementary Particles course till I watched this video, which also cracked me up! XD Thank you so much ! Don't stop!
Ngl that poster you made is the best diagram of the standard model I've seen. At least from an outsiders perspective
Excellent video. Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video. A must see for everyone interested in science, and most everyone not particularly interested in science. Many thanks.
I don't know quantum physics, but from what you described in the video:
The last feynman diagram looks like a neutron and a proton exchanging and up quark for a down quark, turning the proton into a neutron and the neutron into a proton? The gluons involved makes it a strong force interaction?
I think yes
Bingo!
I also don't know mu h about quantum physics but for I know charge of up and down quark
So charge of gluon came as 4/3
And charge of that orange* down quark came -5/3
But gluon isn't supposed to have charge
I am able to understand this is strong force interaction
But I also know charge is conserved
@@domainofscience please help me
@@aryanbajaj4337 If I'm correct, the gluon didn't change the charge in the system. The yellow down change his movement because of the gluon "discharge" (as in the electrons and photon in the beginning) and then it happened again with another gluon. The first gluon became an up quark and anti up (charged add up to 0) and then the anti up and other up became the second gluon. So not charge was added to the system or taken from it.
Hope I help a little!
The last Feynman diagram shows a down quark changed its colour charge and direction by the momentum of the emitted gluon . This gluon decayed into up quark and anti up quark then the up quark change the first nutron into proton then the anti up quark join the up quark from the other proton to make a gluon that changes the direction and the colour charge of the first down quark which changed the second proton into nutron
Thank you, you saved my time.
The funny bits let you get really technical while keeping the material accessible, so I say keep them in!
man give this man 1M subs
Seemed scary, I was hesitant but this now is the best thing i have ever seen. Animat ok ng thr diagrams makes everything different
I don't know anything about quantum physics but I would listen to anything you wanted to talk at length about.
3:29 The feeling in our hearts when we look deep into the eyes of a loved one
He: Looks right into my eyes
Me: 😳
😉
No.
@@shilpadesai8031 ?
The passion, jokes, and sarcasm in this video make it thoroughly enjoyable and informative. Love it!
Really enjoy the humour, bit over the top in places, nevertheless 11/10 would watch again.
1:43 "time on the y -axis is the most common way of..."
My teachers, text book and the test: ...no...
Amazingly enough I did not suffer information overload
great, as a social science student, learning it for no reason at all.
Well, you're definitely not a comedian. But the physics is solid.
He'll get better with time... hopfully...
@@zyansheep This made me chuckle. Can you do the jokes from now on?
@@domainofscience Sure I can! I'm the proud owner of 1.4k reddit karma! That's a lot right? Right....?
_oh god what have I been doing with my time_
Fair point. In my defence, making physics funny is probably not the easiest kind of comedy.
@@domainofscience You need Lee Mack. He knows nothing about physics, but lots about comedy.
Thank you for revising the concept. We were taught this around the age of 10 and there us gonna be a test about this in our school after summer (im 14 now)
who the hell teaches 10 year olds mandatory particle physics
Fantastic video
At 6:22, how is the photon aligned at an angle, it should be parallel to the space axis right?
Thanks Dominic Sir...... Great Video!!
Great! very well explained! thank you so much for the knowledge!👍
Anti-matter is moving forward in time...but we are moving forward in time too. Does that mean that we can't see anti-matter because it and us are moving forward in time? So if you took time out of the equation, then wouldn't you be able to see anti-matter?
8:00 That looks like a neutron and proton exchanging positions via a pion exchange? The force at work here is the residual nuclear force.
Thank you sooo much for this video, and to make me update with new version of Physics. Since I finished my school !
Hey, when the down quark turns into an up quark and the up quark turns into a down quark, is the electrical charge of the quarks transferred by w-w+ bosons? Also, after the up quark turns into a down quark and the up quark turns into a down quark, where do the electric charges come from? Does w- w+ come from bosons or is it a phenomenon arising from the nature of quarks?
the jokes are a bit more than expected. but the content is great! love your videos
I would really appreciate it if you made a poster for all medical fields if you are so inclined. Regardless I appreciate all of your videos.
The last Feynman diagram of proton neutron attraction by exchanging the pi meson by strong attraction
7:33 I actually took the time to parse out what was going on in this model and it was in this moment where I exclaimed "I'm starting to comprehend quantum mechanics! Holy Sh**!"
Except that you don't. These diagrams do not represent quantum mechanics. They represent one particular way to solve its equations.
3:09 "every single human experience" -> also hearing and touching?
"Hopefully they tell you, and if they don't, then they're bad people" nomames HAHAHAHAH such a nice nice channel!! Greetings from Mexico! :)
Wow, so easy to understand ^^ great work
Soo any explanation on the 7:28-7:41 diagram?
best explanation ever!
8:01 looks like a proton and neutron hitting each other ?
and there's some gluon keeping those 2 particle in place
am I right ?
Hi, in this video you promised a followup video on the LAWs. I cannot seem to find it?
Last diagram shows residual strong interaction between proton and neutron mediated by a pi minus meson.
Aw, I hope you didn’t miss out on many views by reuploading
*doS - Domain of Sciense* *WELL DONE...*
Thanks a lot DoS👍
Kral altyazı koyabilir misin
@@maxwellinsihirlilambas9029 keşke o yeterlilikte olsamda çevirip koysam Maxwell.
Üzgünüm :(
you should make videos on the map of relativity and the map of classical physics
I have no idea what you are talking about 😂but this video is just great!!
Strong force they dude behind this interaction as gluons are being seen and involves closely kept nucleons.
7:30 Question: What is the diagram depicting and which force is mediating this interaction?
The fact that the arrows at the top point in opposite directions kinda puzzle me, but I'd say it's the formation of deuterium through the strong nuclear force. I'm 99% sure the strong force is responsible for this interaction, but only 5% sure about what the diagram is actually showing 🥲.
"X and Y are any two electroweak bosons such that charge is conserved"
"a monad is a monoid in the category of endofunctors"
So if antimatter goes backwards in time and exchanges with a particle of matter, does anti matter change the course of time?
say like a potential future from when in time the antimatter came from?
Strong neutron and proton force with down quarks and up anti matter connecting two strong 3 neutron and 3 proton forces.
Hey man do you offer like a poster bundle to get all of them at a reduced price? I wanna cover my bedroom in a science map wallpaper
On 7:25 how do I know that the neutron ain't colliding with the proton?
8:09 is the answer gluons
I'm gonna say it's a strong force interaction (gluons carry the strong force at 3:14), and it appears to be a neutron becoming a proton and a proton becoming a neutron in tandem.
I seem to remember in one of your videos that neutrons are less stable than protons, so I assume the initial driving force is the left neutron's potential to decay into a proton. This is shown with the down-quark emitting the gluon (as it gets attracted to the proton on the right, I'm guessing). That gluon then splits into an up-quark and anti-up-quark (obeying the laws of conservation of something?). That up-quark goes back with his buddies to become a proton, and the anti-up-quark gets attracted to an up-quark in the other proton, they annihilate and become a gluon, in the opposite process of what created the anti-up-quark in the first place. All the while, we got this down-quark moving toward this proton, probably missing it's gluon energy, then here this gluon comes, just in time to put it all together into a neutron.
Seeing as how this is protons and neutrons, I can only assume this takes place in the nuclei of atoms.
That axes joke was top-tier
I love your videos!
Abdolutely fascinating 👌🙌🎀🐺
Thanks for explaining this topic and sprinkling a little brevity on/in it! 😅
Could someone explain how the diagram in the thumbnail is valid? I thought the diagram violates conservation of charge because the initial state has charge +1, the intermediate has 1 due to the W boson, and the final has a charge of -1 due to the electron. In class we draw a vertical line before or after each vertex and ensure that at every moment in time, the total charge is equal
7:35 the strong force in an atom nucleus (between a neutron and a proton)
Very great video! Thank you)
got my physics final exams today 😎 thanks for the video
Question: Why would drawing Feynman diagrams with time going up be the most common way? In physics, time is usually the independent variable (going horizontally) and position is the dependent variable (going vertically) so why would they switch it in this one instance? I don’t know enough about this, so it might not be just one instance and I probably don’t have enough info to assert this. I just don’t understand why basic depictions wouldn’t be homogenous across all of physics.
Hi - I'm thinking that the diagram is n+p elastic scattering where the n & p exchange into each other. I'm not a theoretical physicist (I'm a Medical Physicist); but it appears that the standard model rules and particles keep increasing. This reminds me of the past Earth-centered model of the universe, where epicycles upon epicycles must be added to make it work. We do not have enough understanding of the universe to make it work either. Cheers! - Tim
What if I reverse the direction of time for beta emission? Do I only need to change directions of the arrows or do I also need to swap the positions of the neutron and the proton?
I think the last diagram shows a strong interaction between a proton and a neutron, where n0 becomes p+ and p+ becomes n0. The n0 down quark emits a gluon and then absorbs one emitted by the p+ up quark. The p+ up quark emits a gluon, becomes an anti-up quark, and then absorbs the gluon emitted by the n0 down quark. In doing so, it becomes a up quark again.
Can someone correct me, please, if something is wrong. I am a student in 9th grade, so we do not learn this in school and I can not ask during the lesson.
Also thank you for the great video.
Suggest me a good self study book for studying particle physics. Should contain basics.
3:54. I just want to say that i legit got a jumpscare and turned around to look in my room because of how the voice sounded
Nice colors 😊
Hi all
I can't seem to find the next video in the series; the one about the conservation rules. If someone could point me in the right direction would be much appreciated
Thank u so much 😀😀
I frickin love all the physics!
7:35 God I hope I'm not wrong about this... Was so hard to not look at comments before writing this lol
Looks to me like the strong force bringing a proton and neutron together to make a hydrogen nuclei?
But how do you recover the path integral from a set of Feynman diagrams? Or the converse too?
I'm in 2nd semester of a (graduate) QFT course and we're using "Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model" by Schwartz...any opinion on it?
Love you😆❤️
When you're so early, you don't know what to say.
I hate trends.
apparently not early enough, since if you were early enough that means you would have watched the first upload with errors, and while making a comment here 4 minutes after this video was uploaded, you would have said something about seeing the first upload of this video
@@TheMixxon2 he re-uploaded.
@@gaminghunt5837 why are you say it as if I don't know that ? have you like read what I said ? I think it explicitly shows that I am and was more than aware that this was a re-upload :)
@@TheMixxon2 whoa! I was just fooling around.
A brave heart to put Turkish subtitles ?
Its a strong force attraction between a proton and a neutron.
Here from the short! :))
can anti-particles be detected? do they really move backwards in time? if so, can we use them to send messages to the past?
Is it the strong force holding a proton and neutron together in the nucleus through a strong force interaction but in doing so they technically swap places?
The first part of the sentence is right. Yes, the strong force holds the nucleus together. No, they don't "swap places". There is ofc other forces in play though, so it's not the only force inside of a nucleus
Does the mystery diagram depict how a proton and a neutron, through the use of the strong force, exchange quarks: the original proton receiving a down quark to become a neutron and the original neutron receiving an up quark which was turned to anti-matter before reverting back to matter to introduce itself into the original neutron to convert it into a proton?
At 5 50 in the top left there is a depiction of a weak interaction, but I am confused to as why the exchange particle is W- boson and not a W+ boson, as the diagram seems to depict a beta + decay
it’s an interaction that can be found in supernovae: an electron and a proton combine to form a neutron and an electron neutrino in a sort of reverse beta decay. the electron is giving up its charge in the form of w- turning it into an electron neutrino, which then neutralises the proton’s charge to make a neutron.