Particle Physics Explained Visually in 20 min | Feynman diagrams

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 тра 2024
  • Get MagellanTV here: try.magellantv.com/arvinash and get an exclusive offer for our viewers: an extended, month-long trial, FREE. MagellanTV has the largest and best collection of Science content anywhere, including Space, Physics, Technology, Nature, Mind and Body, and a growing collection of 4K. This new streaming service has 3000 great documentaries. Check out our personal recommendation and MagellanTV’s exclusive playlists: www.magellantv.com/genres/sci...
    If you didn't understand this video, these may help:
    • Why & How do the 4 fun... -- Mechanism of the fundamental forces
    • QFT: What is the unive... -- What are quantum fields?
    0:00 - Intro & Fields
    2:22 - Special offer
    3:09 - Particles, charges, forces
    6:32 - Recap
    7:13 - Electromagnetism
    10:04 - Weak force
    12:19 - Strong force
    16:53 - Higgs
    If we generalize the concept of bosons interacting with particles, we can get all fundamental particle physics. Complex math, but physicist Richard Feynman came up with a simple way to view these interactions - Feynman diagrams.
    The 12 fermions are depicted as straight lines with arrows in the diagrams. The arrows represent the “flow” of fermions. No two arrows point towards each other. If time is in the x direction, then fermion arrows going forwards are matter particles, and those going backwards, antimatter particles.
    All 6 quarks have color charges. All particles with color charges interact with the strong nuclear force. Quarks also have an electric charge, so they also feel the electromagnetic force.
    Leptons can be divided into the electron and its heavier cousins, the muon and tau particles. These all have electric charges but no color charges. Neutrinos do not have a color charge or an electric charge, so they are not affected by the strong and electromagnetic forces.
    All fermions carry something called weak isospin. This can be thought of as the “charge” of the weak force. It can be +1/2 or 1/2. All fermions interact with the weak force. But weak isospin can also be -1, 0, and +1 - the W boson has a weak isospin of -1, W+ has +1, Higgs has -1/2, and Z boson and photons have a weak isospin of 0. Note that this zero is not the same has having no isospin. Everything in the standard model has a weak isospin except gluons.
    The weak force has the power to turn one particle into another particle. It is the only force that can do that.
    To recap, quarks interact with all forces, electron like particles interact with electromagnetism and the weak force, but do not interact with the strong force. Neutrinos only interact with the weak force and nothing else. Only quarks and gluons carry the strong force. Higgs bosons do not interact with photons or gluons. They confer mass to fundamental particles, so all fundamental particles with mass interact with Higgs.
    The simplest force is electromagnetic which interacts with quarks and leptons. Repulsion is depicted in Møller scattering. Attraction is shown in Bhabha scattering. When electrons and positrons are near each other, they can annihilate or attract each other.'
    Weak force is felt by all of the standard model particles, except gluons. W-boson can do something very special. They can change the identity or flavor of the particle - a neutron to a proton. We probably would not exist without it.
    Z-boson has no electric charge and can mediate interactions with electrically neutral particles like the neutrino and the Higgs.
    The strong force is the most complicated mathematically, but since it only relates to quarks and gluons. A pair of quarks can change color. This happens all the time inside protons and neutrons, and is the glue that binds the quarks together.
    Because gluons themselves contain color charges, they also interact with each other via complicated diagrams. This is what flux tubes are made of. These tubes are formed when you try to pull quarks apart.
    Mesons are formed when a quark tries to leave a nucleon. These mesons are a combination of a quark, anti-quark pairs which mediate the strong force between protons and neutrons.
    Pi mesons exchanges colors and quarks between protons and neutron. This is what keeps them glued together. Color charges must be conserved. Either red, blue, and green must combine, or color anti-color must combine to form a neutral color charge.
    The most prominent process used at the Large hadron collider to make a Higgs boson is called the gluon fusion process. During high energy proton-proton collisions, two high energy gluons can be produced. Strong force interaction can turn these into top quarks which fuse together via a loop of top quark, anti-top quark creation and annihilation. The energy of this can create a Higgs boson.
    #particlephysics
    #fundamentalforces
    When particles decay, they tend to decay into the next highest mass particle.
    Become a patron: www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=17...
    Further reading: t.ly/fKKD
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 845

  • @ArvinAsh
    @ArvinAsh  3 роки тому +90

    If you're new to this topic, or want to review some of the preliminary background, these videos would be helpful:
    ua-cam.com/video/xZqID1zSm0k/v-deo.html -- What is the mechanism of the fundamental forces?
    ua-cam.com/video/jlEovwE1oHI/v-deo.html -- What are quantum fields?
    For more details on QCD and QED:
    ua-cam.com/video/KnbrRhkJCRk/v-deo.html - How the strong force works: quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
    ua-cam.com/video/PutOOpAkjQ4/v-deo.html - How electromagnetism works: quantum electrodynamics (QED)

    • @dwilliams435
      @dwilliams435 3 роки тому +1

      ​if neutrons are made of a certain success criteria say a hydrogen atom is made of 1 proton and 1 electron, what difference does it make if the quarks in its neutron have different colour charges? it is still a proton so it is still a hydrogen atom.

    • @brianpj5860
      @brianpj5860 3 роки тому +1

      Arvin, I have a question about Color charge. Do we know if the 3 fermion colors have differing properties associated with them?? I understand that each quark that are held together, making up the nucleon, must have its own color that varies from the other quarks.
      But do each of these differing colour charges have some distinction between them? Or are they all considered equal or neutral to each-other? How was “Colour Charge” first conceived or detected?
      Like for example, Would colour charge “Green” differ from “Cyan” or “ Magenta”?? Due to some arbitrary reason? Like It having more energy, or having a wider “Spectrum” of colours compared to the others?
      Or is the “Colour Charge” just different yet elaborate way to say that each quark entangled by gluons, within their resident fermions, cannot simultaneously have the same quanta of energy?? Im Generally very curious.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 роки тому +5

      @@brianpj5860 It would be helpful if you saw my video on QCD. The link is in the main comment. It is important to remember that "color" charge is just a metaphor for how the various charges interact. It has nothing to do with optical colors. The way they interact with each other is what sets them apart.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 роки тому +5

      @@dwilliams435 Not sure I understand the question. There is no no neutron in a normal hydrogen atom. But in order for any neutron to exist, its three quarks would all have to have a combination of RGB, it doesn't matter which color the three quarks individually have, as long as it's a combination of the three colors.

    • @dwilliams435
      @dwilliams435 3 роки тому +1

      @@ArvinAsh so that answers my question, the point of the question is do colour charges affect the behaviour of atoms and their subatomic particles

  • @WilliamDye-willdye
    @WilliamDye-willdye 3 роки тому +428

    This is an excellent example of what I want: "above my head, but not out of reach". Thank you.

    • @quantummechanics5774
      @quantummechanics5774 3 роки тому +5

      I am a small student of class 7 elementary school 12 year old from india and I make videos related to quantum physics relativity, quantum field theory, quantum phenomenons, quantum mechanics equations etc etc but I am a small student and a small creater and started making videos on UA-cam 2 months ago that's why no one supports me please support my channel channel name physics chemistry and quantum physics channel link : ua-cam.com/channels/no5qmhFA4S07N4TEpWH3dQ.html please visit to my channel support it and subscribe to it

    • @marcusrosales3344
      @marcusrosales3344 3 роки тому +2

      The explanations are very incomplete tbh. There's almost no way of understanding what he means by isospin for instance.

    • @tracyhouser4100
      @tracyhouser4100 3 роки тому +2

      Awesome phrase. Thanks for sharing that

    • @renx81
      @renx81 2 роки тому +1

      Hah, well put!

    • @renx81
      @renx81 2 роки тому +6

      @@marcusrosales3344 That was way out of scope of this video. You cannot expect someone to explain to you all of those terms in a short video on a certain topic. If there are things (unrelated to the topic of this video, i.e. Feynman diagrams) that you don't understand, you'll have to investigate further. By, for example, watching videos on the weak nuclear force, or perhaps more specifically, on QFD (Quantum FlavourDynamics), the quantum field theory describing the weak interaction. Or perhaps even better, look into the electroweak theory (EWT).

  • @Just_Sara
    @Just_Sara 3 роки тому +404

    Anyone who can turn math into pictures is unequivocally a science rockstar.

    • @dhararry7929
      @dhararry7929 3 роки тому +8

      Agreed.

    • @tryingtomakesenseoftheverse
      @tryingtomakesenseoftheverse 3 роки тому +25

      Feynman was the Ulta max pro og science Rockstar

    • @christianwilliams2248
      @christianwilliams2248 3 роки тому +1

      @Science Revolution maybe what the physicists are showing us is an over generalisation of what's going on which leads to some conflicting arguments. if the maths checks out idk

    • @tryingtomakesenseoftheverse
      @tryingtomakesenseoftheverse 3 роки тому +1

      @Science Revolution nothing is absolutely incompressible in solids molecules are vibrating in about a fixed mean position
      2.Columns force is stabilized in certain atomic orbitals thats the Bohr's model of atom. The Columb's force balances the centripetal acceleration.
      Columb's force is just 1 among the fundamental forces there is strong and short forces in play between subatomic particles.

    • @kashu7691
      @kashu7691 3 роки тому +10

      @Science Revolution you sound like the classical physicists from long ago, all your questions now have answers in modern physics. Learn to let go of your intuition because it's only holding you back

  • @rodnyc.8876
    @rodnyc.8876 3 роки тому +185

    I'll never get tired of saying this:
    Thank you Arvin and your team behind all these amazing videos, you're the best.
    I have learned a lot with you.
    Many blessings my friend

  • @mahmoudjbely1464
    @mahmoudjbely1464 3 роки тому +71

    If Richard Feynman could see this video he would be so happy!
    thank you.

  • @sureshms3071
    @sureshms3071 3 роки тому +16

    I want to become a particle physist and this video was very helpful sir.. Thank you!!

  • @nHans
    @nHans 3 роки тому +3

    Arvin, I'm gonna frame this as the quote of the year:
    6:10 *"It's a stretch to call the Weak Force a **_force._** It's more like a **_power._** The Weak Force has the **_power_** to turn one particle into another particle."*
    That is the best, most succinct explanation of the Weak Force that I've ever heard. Accuse me of seeking confirmation bias if you will, but it ameliorates the biggest unease I've had about calling it a "force." Ever since my school days, to me, _force_ in physics is anything that can cause acceleration. Or, to use General Relativity terminology, anything that can change the straight-line trajectories of particles in space-time.
    I'm also happy that you reaffirmed gravity's status as a force. The fact that it's not included in the Standard Model doesn't nullify its ability to change trajectories.
    Of course, I have misgivings about calling the Weak Force a _power_ as well, since _power_ too has a technical definition in physics-the rate at which _work_ is done. I'd probably go with "... *ability* to turn one particle into another." There, last nit picked and done.

    • @WilliamDye-willdye
      @WilliamDye-willdye 3 роки тому

      Good point about the technical definition of "power". "Ability" is not a bad substitute. The weak force is a special beast indeed.

    • @MikeRosoftJH
      @MikeRosoftJH 3 роки тому

      But weak interaction can also act as an attractive or repulsive force (though significantly weaker than electromagnetism), and electromagnetism can also transform a particle into another (for example, a neutral pion decays by means of electromagnetic force, usually into a pair of photons).

  • @OmegaFalcon
    @OmegaFalcon 3 роки тому +25

    So if i understand correctly...
    The down up anti color charge isospin with down left-right strong anti pi meson +5/6 color charge interacts with the higgs anti photon pair and anti blue anti green positron which causes a change in anti-momentum forming a new anti-anti particle with charge equal to 3 quarts + 1 pint sugar plus an anti mexico-meson pair.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 роки тому +14

      I audibly chuckled at your comment! lol. Wonderful! But I think you forgot the 2 cups of flour, an egg, and 4 pints of beer!

    • @madlad9726
      @madlad9726 3 роки тому +2

      noob

    • @dingusmcscrungophd5219
      @dingusmcscrungophd5219 2 роки тому +1

      I think you've pretty much nailed particle physics

    • @musicalfringe
      @musicalfringe 2 роки тому

      Was that a subtle James Joyce reference?

  • @omargaber3122
    @omargaber3122 3 роки тому +104

    I love you so much, man, and I love the way you explain, you sound like a great artist like Robert De Niro or Al Pacino, I often don't press skip ad to support you.

    • @dinaray2025
      @dinaray2025 3 роки тому +10

      I agree, I don't skip ads, and he's more like Robert Plant or Roger Waters to me...

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 роки тому +22

      Haha, I Appreciate that!

    • @djphylearninglake7172
      @djphylearninglake7172 3 роки тому +3

      Me too

    • @lim-dulspaladin50
      @lim-dulspaladin50 3 роки тому

      Dido! What he said. 😋

    • @frun
      @frun 3 роки тому +2

      " I often don't press skip ad to support you." It doesn't make a difference as far as i know. You're just wasting your time.

  • @1xxxtylerxxx1
    @1xxxtylerxxx1 Рік тому +1

    Hey, thanks for taking the time to put this together - this was really great. I got my pen and paper out for this one and I've been casually following along slowly with this video for the past couple of days. You really helped clarify Feynman diagrams and now I can have a better understanding of what's going on when I see them. Keep the good content coming - Thanks.

  • @kidzbop38isstraightfire92
    @kidzbop38isstraightfire92 3 роки тому +2

    Arvin, this is an EXCELLENT video on Feynman diagrams and simplified particle physics. Thank you for making this! I always look forward to your videos.

  • @MoReal2
    @MoReal2 Місяць тому +2

    I have never liked physics until I found this channel.
    Thank you Arvin.

  • @awaresoul1389
    @awaresoul1389 2 роки тому +3

    Being able to hear you explaining things makes me feel blessed

  • @SystemicCreative
    @SystemicCreative 2 роки тому +2

    Dude, you're an absolute genius at describing complex things simply! Brilliant as always!

  • @llampwall
    @llampwall 2 роки тому +2

    This is great. I gotta say though: the uninterrupted powering through of the strong force section is what I want to show people who ask me how particle physics works to get them to say "ok nevermind" lol.

  • @nidhilok
    @nidhilok 3 роки тому +5

    it is really astonishing, seeing a person on youtube who can explain complex physics very well without introducing its maths........ love from india..

  • @itsiwhatitsi
    @itsiwhatitsi Рік тому +2

    Arvin Ash this is my favorite channel about the standard model particles, your work to simplify and teach is amazing! Great job ! I am studying this topic with your channel 👌 and is really appreciated

  • @paulpearson6469
    @paulpearson6469 2 роки тому +1

    best few videos I've watched on this subject! Thanks!

  • @akivanov554
    @akivanov554 3 роки тому +2

    Great content, thank you Arvin Ash. Your video are motivating to go and study quantum physics in a more depth :)

  • @ramimahdi2
    @ramimahdi2 3 роки тому +1

    You are a brilliant educator ... And you strike a good balance of technical depth and simplicity

  • @erebology
    @erebology 3 роки тому +35

    Superb!!! Animated Feynman diagrams are GREAT!!! Please do more like these, but with many dots flowing through at once, faster.

  • @shubhsrivastava4417
    @shubhsrivastava4417 3 роки тому +2

    Excellent Video!! 👍🏻👍🏻
    The video was very easy to understand and I appreciate your efforts and style to explain the strange workings of the Universe👍🏻👍🏻

  • @kagannasuhbeyoglu
    @kagannasuhbeyoglu 3 роки тому +1

    Very informative video for us.
    Thanks a lot Arvin Ash👍
    Perfect content 👏

  • @lindapunches9012
    @lindapunches9012 2 роки тому +2

    Im 11 years old and am still fascinated by this. Keep it u Arvin! Merry xmas!

  • @MariaGomes-jo4dl
    @MariaGomes-jo4dl Рік тому +1

    Thank you for the great video. It is magnific!

  • @Sid_R
    @Sid_R 3 роки тому +4

    This is the greatest Christmas present I've ever received. Thank you so much!

  • @jonathancunningham4159
    @jonathancunningham4159 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks Arvin. That was awesome!

  • @HunzolEv
    @HunzolEv Рік тому +1

    Your animations are supero heroic and inspiring, exactly my taste

  • @peterpackiam
    @peterpackiam 2 роки тому +1

    Wow! Arvin, thanks for sharing your Knowledge, Cheers 🍷,

  • @nnfefe9451
    @nnfefe9451 8 місяців тому +1

    Arvin Ash is the best teacher I have encountered.

  • @paulofhoplite4087
    @paulofhoplite4087 7 місяців тому

    Beautifully done!!

  • @rizaldymarcella5203
    @rizaldymarcella5203 3 роки тому +3

    This is the most intuitive explanation of particle physics i have looked at.

  • @advikdutta
    @advikdutta 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much for my understanding of the feyman diagrams

  • @rc5989
    @rc5989 3 роки тому +1

    What a great video from Arvin Ash! Wow!

  • @MelodiesCureMaladies
    @MelodiesCureMaladies 3 роки тому +1

    Best explanation I've heard yet!

  • @nehaseth2793
    @nehaseth2793 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you so much for this video and the message 🙂🙏

  • @pattty847
    @pattty847 2 роки тому +2

    this is possibly one of the greatest UA-cam channels out there. You do great work Arvin!

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  2 роки тому

      Thanks. I Appreciate that!

  • @swamiaman7708
    @swamiaman7708 3 роки тому +2

    We love to watch your videos again and again ....

  • @Arestkaramazov
    @Arestkaramazov 3 роки тому +1

    Best explanation ever, great job!

  • @klong4128
    @klong4128 3 роки тому +1

    Very good introduction to Fundamental Particles Physics updated to 2020 . I bought a 2-thousand-pages Modern
    Physics book in 1999 ,all the 6 QUARKS had been found .Today 2020/21 Standard Model further summarised everythings and addin darkEnergy/darkMatter/BlackHole/QuantumGravity .Atleast my knowledge is updated. Thanks for your 18 minutes animated video .

  • @Briantreeu123
    @Briantreeu123 3 роки тому +1

    What a great video. Thank u for starting my Sunday off right good day to u sir.

  • @Alex-lk7qy
    @Alex-lk7qy 3 роки тому

    Thank you for sharing this knowledge the way you do.

  • @dopaminedealer714
    @dopaminedealer714 3 роки тому +1

    You are amazing at explaining things! Great videos

  • @finojose
    @finojose 3 роки тому +1

    Arvin, I wish you a Merry Christmas .. thank you for all the videos

  • @pranavdeshmukh7229
    @pranavdeshmukh7229 3 роки тому +4

    Great video i love quantum mechanics. Look the video wearing headphones you'll be amazed by the sounds i did so... Thanks once again to bring me closer to my love quantum mechanics.....👍👍

  • @chiranjibsaha2496
    @chiranjibsaha2496 3 роки тому +3

    You always inspires me and give us endless knowledge . " Sir god bless you ❤️❤️❤️❤️" ( Love from India

  • @richardbailie5560
    @richardbailie5560 3 роки тому +4

    Thank you so much for your amazing manner and mind. The name of your series is so accurate in that truly unimaginably complex ideas (for me) are rendered in a way that I engage with and am able to relate to. I'm a plumber in Cape Town South Africa and this stuff fascinates me, even if I cannot understand it. It prompts me to ask fundamental questions about chance, existence, the laws of physics and whether or not they are fundamental or only fundamental in our universe.... gosh, in short, I get stimulated and I love that people like you give of your time. Thanks again.
    If you're ever in Cape Town......

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 роки тому +1

      Next time I travel abroad, I will let the audience know. Cape Town has been a place I've wanted to visit.

  • @heribertobarahona7695
    @heribertobarahona7695 3 роки тому +1

    I LOVE THIS VIDEO! Thank You!

  • @swamiaman7708
    @swamiaman7708 3 роки тому +5

    Wow ..... You must get noble prize for teaching such complicated things in such simple language ......

  • @M_0892
    @M_0892 9 місяців тому

    that's great! Thx so Much and thx to Richard Feynman!

  • @slickjunt
    @slickjunt Рік тому +1

    Really dig this channel - thanks for making these videos - GODS WORK

  • @baasantserenganbold2925
    @baasantserenganbold2925 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for the amazing explanation video.

  • @jacobworkman6455
    @jacobworkman6455 3 роки тому +1

    Great video, thank you for these 👍

  • @sledge77
    @sledge77 3 роки тому +1

    This was helpful. Thank you.

  • @chendwachintu4429
    @chendwachintu4429 3 роки тому +1

    YOur vids are so well put together, Ash! Always enjoy them

  • @joranwind8804
    @joranwind8804 3 роки тому +1

    Hey man, I want to thank you for making my year a lot better. I hope you have an amazing Christmas and I will hopefully see you in many next videos my friend!

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 роки тому +1

      I appreciate the warm wishes. Merry Christmas my friend!

  • @altortugas5979
    @altortugas5979 3 роки тому +2

    I love this channel. Just wanted to say that.

  • @justinoden2229
    @justinoden2229 3 роки тому +6

    Thank you. I just started digging into Feynman and needed this. Your channel has helped me learn so much.

  • @andrewsciencetube3828
    @andrewsciencetube3828 3 роки тому

    i always amazed by nature spacially on a quantum scale, imagine how much the nature is beautiful.

  • @thusithherath4788
    @thusithherath4788 2 роки тому +1

    Superb explanation.... ❤🔥
    Totally addicted

  • @flake8382
    @flake8382 4 місяці тому +1

    This video is perfect for "I understand these things seperately, help me unify my understanding."
    These UA-cam videos are so rare it's honestly sad.
    Basics, or super advanced, and never in between.

  • @user-rh7bq3mr9n
    @user-rh7bq3mr9n 3 роки тому +2

    Love your content

  • @sadashivnande5800
    @sadashivnande5800 3 роки тому +1

    Amazing video... sounds like all of physics at once...
    and he said merry Christmas 🤓😎

  • @pushing2throttles
    @pushing2throttles 3 роки тому

    Well, I'm going to watch this at minimum 5 times. Explained simply however there's nothing simple about the quantum realm. I thank you for this awesome video. I don't understand the math so channel's like yours are great because you can explain it in a way that is comprehensive.

  • @somnathdas8530
    @somnathdas8530 3 роки тому +1

    This man is amazing!

  • @newdeep2022
    @newdeep2022 3 роки тому +1

    You're the real science hero

  • @Rico-Suave_
    @Rico-Suave_ 3 роки тому +1

    Well organized video, thank you very much, didn’t understand much

  • @g3452sgp
    @g3452sgp 3 роки тому +7

    This updated version of Particle Physics video is great!

  • @nicholasreyna2164
    @nicholasreyna2164 5 місяців тому

    man that color charge stuff flew over my head, these feynman diagrams are different than the ones I learned in my physics class

  • @sushilsharma691
    @sushilsharma691 2 роки тому +1

    This is awesome sir.

  • @matyasmeszaros1904
    @matyasmeszaros1904 3 роки тому +1

    Wow... Thank you!

  • @happyrogue7146
    @happyrogue7146 3 роки тому +20

    OK, this guy has literally summarized 2 years of my graduate studies in 18 minutes

    • @brandong6766
      @brandong6766 3 роки тому +2

      That's what I'm saying.... The only thing college is good for is the labs. The information today cost a few minutes of watching ads... Kind of amazing..

    • @marcusrosales3344
      @marcusrosales3344 3 роки тому +1

      @@brandong6766 Not true. Don't forget being a graduate student mean exploring a problem no one has ever solved. You are actually no longer a student.

  • @josemariodelapiedra611
    @josemariodelapiedra611 3 роки тому +1

    Just fantastic, thanks

  • @lahockeyboy
    @lahockeyboy 3 роки тому +6

    You are such a great teacher, Professor Ash!

  • @jupa7166
    @jupa7166 2 роки тому +1

    Thank You!

  • @shake8771
    @shake8771 3 роки тому +1

    This was so helpful

  • @Darkanight
    @Darkanight 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks, Arvin!

  • @joevogl3431
    @joevogl3431 3 роки тому +6

    I’m a retired actuary, but I’ve recently read Griffiths’ Intro to Elementary Particles and Particles and Nuclei by Povh, et al. I am amazed by the amount of key information Dr. Ash can convey so crisply in 18 minutes!

  • @tanjubhuiyan8556
    @tanjubhuiyan8556 Рік тому +1

    Loved your video sir...

  • @TigerJake2007
    @TigerJake2007 Рік тому +1

    Arvin Ash is a terrific communicator.

  • @alfriedrich
    @alfriedrich 3 роки тому +1

    This episode was a service to humanity!

  • @koenth2359
    @koenth2359 3 роки тому +2

    The best summary on this topic I've seen do far!
    A few things puzzle me however.
    5:14 Weak isospin.
    As I understand it, the numbers given in the diagram 3:17 for each particle are
    mass/energy
    (em)charge
    weak isospin
    But the numbers given text (from 5:26) do not correspond to these. What am I missing? On Wikipedia they talk about T3 being the '3rd component' of the isospin T. Is that the key to understanding this?
    Where does the W0 boson fit in the standard model?
    9:55 Does this actually work with a single photon? I always understood that annihilation results in two photons, because otherwise it could not preserve both momentum and energy (and in a PET scan, the detected γ are 511 keV, corresponding to the energy of an electron).

  • @Pablo_Toulouse
    @Pablo_Toulouse 3 роки тому +1

    Super Arvin! Il a réussi a tout expliquer en une seule vidéo. Chapeau and Many thanks Arvin.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 роки тому

      Je vous remercie. Heureux que vous ayez apprécié.

  • @andrewroberts5988
    @andrewroberts5988 3 роки тому +1

    I love it as always!!! Very well explained. But I will need my downloader because of the excessive ads in addition to the inline product placement. If youtube/google wasn't a world vampire squid, I would get Premium. We should support Mr. Ash on Patreon etc to help him out. He has the best explanations on UA-cam and seems to be an excellent person.

  • @quantumfields5172
    @quantumfields5172 3 роки тому +7

    This is the first time I'm hearing about a "weak charge" and that all particles except gluons have. Amazing video!

  • @dkexpat2755
    @dkexpat2755 3 роки тому

    I can't thank you enough for makeing these videos.

  • @praveenkumar-it2oj
    @praveenkumar-it2oj 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent presentation

  • @richardventus1875
    @richardventus1875 3 роки тому +2

    Alvin - once again, many thanks for this brilliant overview, but it has brought me into even more focus in regard to the current malaise in particle physics. We must remember that these diagrams are only the mathematical rules we have devised to model reality and not reality itself. There are still so many fundamental things about reality we do not know, like what is mass or charge and why mass appears to bend spacetime. As you concluded - hopefully you will inspire the next Einstein to give us more understanding of actual reality. Wishing you a very happy and enlightening new year.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 роки тому +2

      Indeed, almost all our theories describe how nature works, not what it actually is.

  • @cyrilio
    @cyrilio 3 роки тому +1

    Best complete explanation of particle physics ive ever seen. Damn good work Ash

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 роки тому

      Quarks are dual to anti-quarks.
      The electron is dual to the positron synthesizes the photon.
      Quarks are dual to leptons synthesize force carriers.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic.
      The Ricci tensor is dual to the Weyl tensor synthesizes Riemann geometry -- Sir Roger Penrose.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
      Curvature or gravitation is therefore dual.
      Convergence is dual to divergence.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton.
      Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration - Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality).
      Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
      Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
      The big bang is a Janus hole (point) or composed of two faces = Duality.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
      Duality creates reality!

  • @sulugurivinay9038
    @sulugurivinay9038 3 роки тому

    Thanks for giving good information

  • @faisalsheikh7846
    @faisalsheikh7846 3 роки тому +8

    Now these days this channel rocks amazing work sir lots of love ❤ from India🇮🇳

    • @srajanverma9064
      @srajanverma9064 3 роки тому

      Just turn on the hindi sightless to experience something magical

  • @williejohnson487
    @williejohnson487 3 роки тому +1

    Merry Christmas, Arvin. I hope you continue to do UA-cam in 2021.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 роки тому

      Merry Christmas my friend! If I don't croak, I will still be doing it. But, as you know, tomorrow isn't guaranteed for anybody.

    • @williejohnson487
      @williejohnson487 3 роки тому +1

      @@ArvinAsh You know what they say, "Only the good die young". You have been misbehaving some, haven't you?

  • @CraftyF0X
    @CraftyF0X 3 роки тому +1

    Exceptionally comprehensive for a short yt video.

  • @philsobkow8941
    @philsobkow8941 3 роки тому +8

    damn Arvin, I tried but kept feeling my conscious slip in and out there. Awesome video though! It's truly inspiring that any one person can amas that amount of knowledge about something so truly fundamental to our cores.

    • @DLCaster
      @DLCaster 3 роки тому

      That's what pause, rewind and play are for: they dig you out, or rather, they allow your mind the time it needs to absorb and emit understanding.

  • @anishashee8511
    @anishashee8511 2 роки тому +1

    Well explained.

  • @rancern
    @rancern 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks sir for making such videos😇

  • @flopyrelly4281
    @flopyrelly4281 3 роки тому +5

    I get a little bit smarter every time I watch your videos Arvin!
    Looking forward for the next video

  • @markb9347
    @markb9347 3 роки тому +1

    Merry Christmas Arvin and team!

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 роки тому +1

      Merry Christmas my friend!

  • @paulg444
    @paulg444 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you Arvin!

  • @kennethhicks2113
    @kennethhicks2113 3 роки тому +1

    Richard was indeed a genius. His ability to look past the roadblocks (current methods) and look at things as thru a Childs eye and get a better understanding is surpassed only by his ability's to be able to effectively communicate it where a child could understand it. I suggest you read everything you can he's written as it will help your critical thinking... at least it did and still does mine (to viewers as I'm sure Dr. Ash has as have I).