Broken windows May be correct in some cases, but it runs into something known as "unintended consequences". Lots of things can work in the lab, but the world is a far bigger lab
no it isn't. the world is a place where people want to live in peace and cleanliness. broken down things invite filth and animals (both human and the actual animals) to make it into a nasty place to live. i love your academic guilt you experience when you refuse to accept facts.
First you get the experiment wrong factually - the researchers had to break the car windows in Palo Alto, not Bronx - second you simply assert (again wrongly) there's no evidence to support broken windows. Why don't you actually READ about the research first and THEN do the video?
who cares where the car was broken? do YOU want to live in an area where there is broken stuff on the street making it look like a run down ghetto? who wants to live dirty and unkempt? forget only crime but it reduces property values and also discourages people from trying to improve as the neighborhood feels and looks like shit
This is just factually incorrect, (Broken Windows 1982 Wilson & Kelling) Philip Zimbardo, a Stanford psychologist, reported in 1969 on some experiments testing the broken-window theory. He arranged to have an automobile without license plates parked with its hood up on a street in the Bronx and a comparable automobile on a street in Palo Alto, California. The car in the Bronx was attacked by "vandals" within ten minutes of its "abandonment." The first to arrive were a family-father, mother, and young son-who removed the radiator and battery. Within twenty-four hours, virtually everything of value had been removed. Then random destruction began-windows were smashed, parts torn off, upholstery ripped. Children began to use the car as a playground. Most of the adult "vandals" were well-dressed, apparently clean-cut whites. The car in Palo Alto sat untouched for more than a week. Then Zimbardo smashed part of it with a sledgehammer. Soon, passersby were joining in. Within a few hours, the car had been turned upside down and utterly destroyed. Again, the "vandals" appeared to be primarily respectable whites.
worked in? i have lived her for 57 years. how are their facts not accurate? you won't see broken windows or run down spots in bay ridge. compare that to projects across nyc where litter is everywhere and you have crime being invited. it creates a negative culture which eventually leads to crime. no one wants to live around that. you are an idiot.
Why no subtitlesb😢
Broken windows May be correct in some cases, but it runs into something known as "unintended consequences". Lots of things can work in the lab, but the world is a far bigger lab
no it isn't. the world is a place where people want to live in peace and cleanliness. broken down things invite filth and animals (both human and the actual animals) to make it into a nasty place to live. i love your academic guilt you experience when you refuse to accept facts.
what a bastard tune that is at the start
First you get the experiment wrong factually - the researchers had to break the car windows in Palo Alto, not Bronx - second you simply assert (again wrongly) there's no evidence to support broken windows. Why don't you actually READ about the research first and THEN do the video?
who cares where the car was broken? do YOU want to live in an area where there is broken stuff on the street making it look like a run down ghetto? who wants to live dirty and unkempt? forget only crime but it reduces property values and also discourages people from trying to improve as the neighborhood feels and looks like shit
This is just factually incorrect,
(Broken Windows 1982 Wilson & Kelling)
Philip Zimbardo, a Stanford psychologist, reported in 1969 on some experiments testing the broken-window theory. He arranged to have an automobile without license plates parked with its hood up on a street in the Bronx and a comparable automobile on a street in Palo Alto, California. The car in the Bronx was attacked by "vandals" within ten minutes of its "abandonment." The first to arrive were a family-father, mother, and young son-who removed the radiator and battery. Within twenty-four hours, virtually everything of value had been removed. Then random destruction began-windows were smashed, parts torn off, upholstery ripped. Children began to use the car as a playground. Most of the adult "vandals" were well-dressed, apparently clean-cut whites. The car in Palo Alto sat untouched for more than a week. Then Zimbardo smashed part of it with a sledgehammer. Soon, passersby were joining in. Within a few hours, the car had been turned upside down and utterly destroyed. Again, the "vandals" appeared to be primarily respectable whites.
then go ahead and live around people who live around stuff that is broken and run down. see the type of mindset that encourages. must be a nice life.
Worked in NYC.... and their facts are not accurate about this theory, what is going on here???
Their information may be a little outdated since this movie did come out around between 2005-2009
worked in? i have lived her for 57 years. how are their facts not accurate? you won't see broken windows or run down spots in bay ridge. compare that to projects across nyc where litter is everywhere and you have crime being invited. it creates a negative culture which eventually leads to crime. no one wants to live around that. you are an idiot.