I was listening to a documentary on some other channel Then I said to myself "I know this style!!!" And here it is :-) Excellent doc. Thank you's for the excellent work on the doc and the research.
I thought i had already subscribed to this channel a while back, but i guess i didn't, and when i didn't see you in my timeline, i kinda just forgot about you till this morning. Love, love, love your work. I'm going on a binge.
Excellent video, very well made! I think as computer models get more and more advanced we will get an even clearer picture of what ancient earth was like and what it will be like in the future.
Its a shame channels like this get a miniscule audience compared to vevo channels as well as video game channels. Honestly what's more important, virtual reality or the present reality.
Yes it is a shame. I wonder if you apply the same shame to yourself when you spend quality time watching you "favorite" UA-cam videos which include: 10 Amazing Facts About Spongebob Squarepants (this must be riveting!) Top 10 Greatest Rock Bands (Hey, at least it's not Vevo, right Mr I'm Better Than Everybody?) Multiple Metal Gear Solid videos (I thought video game channels aren't important to you?) Top 10 Internet Memes (Ahhh, now here is a cerebral video if I've ever seen one!) You shouldn't judge people based on the videos they watch, lest you be judged yourself. It has absolutely no bearing on their intellect. Comments, on the other hand...
Well, how is a person or the world improved, by watching documentaries, instead of playing a game? Why should anyone watch documentaries, if they prefer games? Personally I prefer documentaries, but does that make me any better than a gamer?
I love this channel, it does a great job with documentaries and even though they are highest quality they offer them for free to us. I can only be grateful, keep up the amazing work and thanks for providing to us really valuable information in such a beautiful way.
At 2:07 "50 kilometres in diameter" and then shows the rock spinning for 10 seconds heating in Earth's atmosphere by friction. Come on people, blast the cobwebs out of your brains. At 50 km diameter the rock strikes Earth when the top of it is 50 km up precisely at the top of the stratosphere where the mesosphere starts. The top of the rock is practically still in space when the bottom of it hits Earth. If you saw it from a commercial jet at cruising altitude you'd see it hit Earth far far below (below the clouds) and look up to see it extends up 5x as high as your jet. This pulverizes and vaporizes billions of tonnes of solid rock. Can you imagine how it just punches the atmosphere out of the way in a fraction of 1 second as though air was identical to the vacuum of space, which it is to this rock. The Chelyabinsk asteroid was just 18 m in diameter. He's saying this rock is 50,000 metres in diameter. Meteor speed is 11-72 km / second so if this one was 40 km / second and 50 kilometres in diameter then it's closest point reaches the top of the stratosphere where the air density is 1,290th of the air density you are breathing at the surface. It's essentially still in space, then all of 1.3 seconds later it smashes into the ground and it punches out air for the entire troposphere for the 50 km diameter like it didn't even exist, sending a pressure wave around Earth's atmosphere. You see a rock in space above and 1.3 seconds later it's all over. Check how long 1.3 seconds is on your cell phone stop watch. This ain't no pissy little baseball spinning for 10 seconds heating in Earth's atmosphere by friction.like in the video Otherwise, good interesting video nicely crafted. Omitted the big, long, interesting atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) event before humans started the even funner one. Starting 82,000,000 years ago the plate with India on it barrelled north east from Antarctica to Asia at a blistering 8" year churning up the sea bed and releasing CO2 for the 30,000,000 years until India smashed into Asia. By then it had raised atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) to a huge 1,000-1,800 ppmv which transformed Earth's climate into a "hot house" with 12 degrees higher Global Mean Surface Temperature (GMST) than now, at 52,000,000 years ago, then India was slowly shoving up the Himalayan mountains & Tibetan Plateau for millions of years (it still is) and the added rock weathering helped to take out atmospheric CO2 for 47,000,000 years until it had dropped all the way from 1,000-1,800 ppmv to 280 ppmv when it was cold enough for orbital & tilt cycles to trigger the glaciation period "Ice Ages" there's been for the last 5,000,000 years. Fun stuff.
I found it informing on some level's, also noticed how it never mentions the possibility if Human's could be speeding up this process. An I have to say I don't have a clue about the numbers an Co2 levels and such, but if this guy really knows his facts and nobody here can state otherwise. I'm gonna take it as mostly factual with an emphasis on natural climate change happening faster everyday now, because it's supposed too...
Thank you very much for clarifying what I've seen elsewhere on youtube and reddit about the western sheet. Also, I had NO idea that the Permian flood basalt eruption was caused by an asteroid on the other side of the planet!
Antarctica’s sea ice set a record this week, reaching 815,448 square miles (1,312,000 square km) of ice above its normal range. Melting from beneath the Antarctic ice shelves. Scientists claim it is then re-frozen back on surface, increasing sea ice.
Although i prefer the more "outward" space related videos, these ones are also interesting and well edited. And the comment section is always fun to read. Its like watching a UFC match, with the only difference that the combatants arent martial arts experts but only random anonymous dudes on the internet taking swings at each other with the "Verbal - Hammer" :D
I know...what's up with that? Most of the comments aren't really people wanting to share thoughts and opinions in a productive way. Mostly people wanting to complain about the opinions of everybody else negatively....why? It's a shame.
At 6:45 if Australia was pushed by the impact away from Antarctica then why is it moving soo fast? Was there an (Lava Lamp) upwelling from below which is mainly pushing them apart?
At about 6:00 this reminded me of a Lava Lamp but I wish I could see all of it instead of just one Hemisphere. Maybe translucent Green for this side so one could see the Red on the back side?
Any generation's misfortune means powerful opportunities for many other people. Wealth, prosperity constantly shift, as do minor wind/ocean currents. Supply and demand, survival of the fittest (physical as well as mental). Opportunities... Opportunities :>) There is not one doomsday scenario portrayed today, that is not human contrived in order to shift wealth. Trick is to follow the trends and invest in the upward, divest before the fall. The natural occurrences of catastrophic proportions (Siberian Traps) are the unpredictable wild card. Reason investors are gamblers. 'Know when to hold 'em, know when to fold'. Sometimes losers... sometimes gainers. Big Dinosaurs became losers (some smaller varieties became chickens... we eat 'em:>). The big boys, the star players could not accept/adapt to change. Their DNA got too comfy ...
don't worry. a bit more heat is not that bad. if you payed attention it did say that we are still living in an iceage. besides. it can't melt. not all of it at least. even mercury has icecaps.
Summary: "The East Antarctic ice sheets are in balance. However, there's a volcano rising from the deep under the Western Antarctic ice sheets causing melting from the underside. ...But let's claim that the melting is from human activity because that's what the environmental alarmists that are paying us want to hear"
We need to start moving our costal cities inland if the ice continues to melt and the sea levels continue to rise, there’s really no other way around it. We need to be proactive about it instead of reactive because if we don’t get out ahead of this trend then by waiting too long we’ll be wasting our time trying to save something that can’t be saved. We can’t ever abandon living on the costal areas of land but serious measures will have to be taken to properly monitor the changes that areas like Antarctica and the Arctic are experiencing in order to continue living on the cost, cities will have to be reconstructed with rising sea levels in mind.
It is so sad to see why people just don't understand what they have been doing to this world we all live in. They take this world of ours for granted and think someone else will clean our mother earth. When you realize you have been eating garbage you created yourself and your body starts to fall apart because of it. Just blame yourself for that. You did it and your mother always told you to clean up your room. You still won't do anything about it. WOW!
I think you're confusing GRACE: Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment-a mission that orbits Earth and is expected to deorbit sometime in 2015 or 2016-with GRAIL: Gravity Recovery And Interior Laboratory-a similar mission to the Moon that ran from March to December 2012. Same sort experiment, very different locations, slightly different acronyms. I'm a little surprised the writer and the voice performer didn't notice the discrepancy between the acronym and the expansion when reading it aloud.
The chemistry of the rocks in Antarctica is similar to rocks in North America. Antarctica was joined with North America at one time; probably when Pangea existed and later.
If the object that impacted the earth from space had that much velocity, would it not also fracture the mass ? It does not seem to make sense that it would not damage the entire earth just layers of it
+Hudspethtb Well for ice we're at 3-ppm/year hundreds of times faster than nature so puts us at 800-ppm within 130-years where all Antarctica's ice will melt off, it really starts going at 600-ppm and the bonus is killing any meaningful coral reefs globally as we fly by 750-ppm. Nature takes a lot longer to change CO2, long-term Pleistocene average is 1-ppm/1000-years, big jump at the end of the ice-age 1-ppm/180-years for metrics. So the message is we're committing to add over 70m/230ft of sea-level with business as usual doesn't matter how long it takes apparently. Right now at 410-ppm we've committed to 25m/82ft of sea-level, it's only how fast and nothing is being done to slow it down, eh?.
That 'fate' is a group of three sister penguins, spinning threads made of herring gut, each of which foretells the fate of.... Oh, yes. Right. Scratch that.
I heard that Antarctica vaporizes in 5,000,000,000 years but I think that's just alarmist propaganda to get my tax money to stop Antarctica (and Earth) vaporizing.
I would imagine that as the ice melts off of Antarctica, Antarctica may bouy up a bit. I wonder if that was considered in any of these "calculations" presented in this production. Life is so complex...
You say reversing though doesn't this mean that while it is happening a shift of the planet's axis is occurring meaning the exposure to the sun is different and therefore certain cold areas get heated more?
Ciprian Ionut Eu nu am impresii, nu am convingeri, nu am pareri. Eu nu cred in nimic. Ma conformez cu realitatea. Adevarul este testabil, verificabil. Daca dai unui extraterestru planurile unei Dacii, tot Dacie ii iese. Sau poate ca am lasat loc de un misto cu Dacia...
It is time that the scientists in space clearing their mess they leave behind in their studies. This also contributes to global warming. Scientists know exactly what happened that the earth is warming in recent years. But instead of that they save the earth and work for peace, they are now looking for other habitable planets.
252Ma meteorite leads to Permian extinction. Antarctica splits from Gondwana at130Ma. That is 120 million years later than the East Antarctic meteorite. It is hard to see how the two could be related as is proposed in this otherwise excellent video.
I always wonder how different the world would be if antarctica were located higher up, where it wouldn't be a frozen wasteland. Or, if Pangea retained its structure. History would sure be different, and so would modern animals.
With Radiometric Dating, when the dates match the theory, they are shown in textbooks, published in papers, shown religiously in museums, and aired on t.v. When the dates kinda match, they are put in the footnotes. When the dates don't match at all, they're simply thrown out. Radiometric Dating rests on unproven assumptions and a sample can be tested hundreds of thousands of times and out of all those times, only 3 dates will match the evolution religion, yet that is enough to "prove macro-evolutionism through radiometric dating."
I think Antarctica would have fully melted around the time the new Pangaea Ultima has formed. But thats just my theory... Especially when you consider how large of a continent Antarctica is.
I think climate change is pretty much inevitable, because people drag their feet about things until they're forced to change. For example, I'm a big fan of water conservation, but I still love my hot showers. The only things that could prevent it would probably be green tech becoming as economical, and as profitable, as fossil fuels. Ultimately it'll probably be a good thing because it'd make us become efficient enough to actually be self-sustaining. Plus, it'd be cool to have enough land exposed in Antarctica to colonize it. :)
just one thing i noticed you didn't include in this, and that is ice displaces sea water once it melts it isn't the same volume that ice displaces, and the fact the new snow and ice falling and forming at the heads of the glaciers, come back out of the weather cycle, i haven't seen any scientific calculation which include these factors, just ones from climate alarmists stating the whole of the ice melting being the whole of sea level rise. maybe if they where more honest and forthcoming with their hypothesis and calculations in detail they'd be ore believable.
I often wonder why the creators of most, if not all documentaries, insist on some inaccurate information as well as omitting some critical to more truthful reporting. 1/. The Earth was much smaller & with much less water when the first plants, insects & animals appeared. Initial growth in diameter & water was primarily from meteorites, small comets & asteroids, although large asteroids such as the one in Central Australia known as Uluru (Ayres Rock), which has at least 2/3 below the ground, have made larger contributions. 2/. The tectonic & volcanic plates are the result of a major collision in the Pacific Ocean region, which also caused the Earth to be tilted. Each time the planets dominate the same side of the Sun, such as currently, the slippage of the Tectonic Plates slows while the Volcanic activity greatly increases. This includes the Antarctic Region which has at least one Super Volcano heating the ice above it. Also the Pacific Ocean volcanic rift has increased its rate of expansion. It is where the newest & most abundant land mass is being formed, albeit deep below where no man has gone before. 3/. Fossil Fuels emit very little CO2, required by plants along with water & sunlight. They do emit CO, poisonous to all life. In reality, the biggest danger to the planet from Greenhouse Gasses are Humans, who continue to clear rainforests & wetlands for industrial, residential & commercial development, obviously expecting farms & rainforests to proliferate in the deserts of the world. 4/. A partial solution to the problems Humans have created is for us to excavate suitable areas of the deserts in order to live, & to some extent work, underground where the temperature would be stable. Above ground could be used for heavy industrial as well as solar power stations. Wind turbines could be used to pump water from dams as well as air in to the underground cities while other wind turbines pump the waste air, water & sewage above, the latter 2 along with solid food waste sent to designated areas in the hope some of the desert may become an oasis. Once such works are completed then would be the task of returning parts of the urban centres back to the rainforests they once were, while other parts used to grow the food we will need to survive.
"The Earth was much smaller" - BEFORE 4.55 BILLION YEARS AGO, when it was still accreting solar system material. It then LOST and GAINED material when it collided with another planetoid to form the MOON during the period known as the HEAVY BOMBARDMENT, which finished around 3.8 BILLION YEARS ago, a date coincident with the beginning of life on earth. It was then the size it is now. This life remained unicellular, bacterial, for THREE BILLION years, before becoming sexual and diversifying into plants, animals, and three other genera. Stop spreading disinformation.
@@robertfindlay2325 That's exactly what I was going to type; Uluru is not an asteroid or meteorite Alan you've got your wires mixed up there mate. It's the biggest rock in the world.
1/ Correct, the Earth was smaller (200 million years ago), probably the size of Mars now, but the expansion was/is caused by Earth's plasma core inflating. Gravity is a phenomena of electromagnetism, not mass (Electric Universe Theory). The Earth's surface gravity then would have needed to be around half its current value to have allowed the very large dinosaurs to have existed. 3/ Oil and gas are not "fossil fuels", they are abiotic, created geothermally from rocks containing hydrogen and carbon. The are no "greenhouse" gases, a gas cannot trap heat, heat flow can not be one way like glass in a real greenhouse. 4/ The Sun's irradiance has reduced (Grand Solar Minimum), and the Antarctic's ice has increased to record levels. The danger now is the little ice age that's starting.
Thank you so much for pronouncing both Cs in Antarctica. When I hear people skip the first C, it makes me want to slap them very very hard. There is a rendering mistake in the world view shown at 8:53. At this time, New Zealand did not yet exist, but its forebear, the continent "Zealandia" was extremely prominent, and was between 8 and 12 times the current size of New Zealand. All that's shown is the sunken remnants of two mountain chains. New Zealand ALWAYS gets shafted by film producers; either left out entirely, or shown incorrectly over time. *sigh*
SO SAD TO SAY, BUT WE'VE REALLY SCREWED THE POOCH, as far as saving the ice of Antarctica. By helping whatever natural, dynamic temperature inversion that was occurring under the ice sheets 100's of feet of packed ice over the ocean that extended far off land, it's past the point of no return. And runaway melting has begun. The 'cork' holding back the vast inland ice fields behind a span between two mountain ridges, the 90% of fresh water held back in fields 2 - 3 miles thick will accelerate moving & melting. As the ice melts, we lose the albedo effect by exposing dark green dark blue ocean water to the sun's rays, its heat is absorbed, warming the water, resulting in melting more ice. The same for ice melting over land. It absorbs the sun's rays instead of reflecting back out to space (the albedo effect) and it starts a self-reinforcing loop, melting ice faster, making water warmer, making water expand as it warms, causing loss of our coastal lands. It also increases moisture available to make storms stormier. Hurricanes will be warmer, larger & more destructive...just as they strike land. Thunderstorms will be more severe. Monsoon seasons are worsening each year due to more & more atmospheric moisture absorption. Glacier will soon be gone. In my lifetime, Glacier National Park in the US had 100's of glaciers. Soon, there won't be much of anything left. 30 - 40 yrs ago, I used to sled down glaciers in the Sierra Nevada mountains, home to Mt Whitney, the highest mountain in the lower 48 states in the US. It used to have snow up there all year round. Mammoth Mountain, in CA. used to have skiing till 4th of July...in T shirts & jeans. Chicks in bikinis. Now, it's maybe 2 months of OK skiing, then it's man-made trails of snow on brown hills once you are off the snow path. I remember 20 yrs ago, the Mammoth Village had 25 feet of snow at 9,000" & they had to dig DOWN to people's roofs. Driving the main road was just the street with a 25 ft wall straight up the right side of the road & 25 ft wall on the left side of the road. A vertical wall of snow made a street canyon with right angles! It's not all gonna go in 10, 20, 50 years. Maybe not for 100, but surely by 200 yrs. It's already leaving. The SW US is in a 20 yr MEGA drought, but there's been a record-breaking 2,000 yr drought ebbing & flowing. But it is going, going, soon to be gone. And it'll be gone until Mother Earth decides to change it. Because...Ooooh, we've recked it. And we will never be able to fix it. Whoever is left will be fucked b/c we wrecked it today. And it's shame on us. I'm so glad I decided to not have any kids. And I feel bad for my brothers & sisters, and their kids, my nieces & nephews.
Antarctica has never been so vast since records began. !!! why are people not talking about this ! they only show the ice bergs melting in the north pole. what are they up too !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Amazing how true this video has proven to be. Amazing also, though sad, is the section of comments with legions of imbeciles offering uninformed and unwanted opinions that only demonstrate how stupid they are.
I was listening to a documentary on some other channel
Then I said to myself "I know this style!!!"
And here it is :-)
Excellent doc. Thank you's for the excellent work on the doc and the research.
Watching this great informational documentry in 2020. One of best video ever watched on UA-cam.
I thought i had already subscribed to this channel a while back, but i guess i didn't, and when i didn't see you in my timeline, i kinda just forgot about you till this morning. Love, love, love your work. I'm going on a binge.
Excellent video, very well made! I think as computer models get more and more advanced we will get an even clearer picture of what ancient earth was like and what it will be like in the future.
Its a shame channels like this get a miniscule audience compared to vevo channels as well as video game channels. Honestly what's more important, virtual reality or the present reality.
thats the difference between quantity and quality ;)
Yes it is a shame. I wonder if you apply the same shame to yourself when you spend quality time watching you "favorite" UA-cam videos which include:
10 Amazing Facts About Spongebob Squarepants (this must be riveting!)
Top 10 Greatest Rock Bands (Hey, at least it's not Vevo, right Mr I'm Better Than Everybody?)
Multiple Metal Gear Solid videos (I thought video game channels aren't important to you?)
Top 10 Internet Memes (Ahhh, now here is a cerebral video if I've ever seen one!)
You shouldn't judge people based on the videos they watch, lest you be judged yourself. It has absolutely no bearing on their intellect. Comments, on the other hand...
couldn't have said better then this
Present and future reality, obviously.
Well, how is a person or the world improved, by watching documentaries, instead of playing a game? Why should anyone watch documentaries, if they prefer games?
Personally I prefer documentaries, but does that make me any better than a gamer?
1:40 i say this is probably the best CGI i've seen in a doco, i love it!
I love this channel, it does a great job with documentaries and even though they are highest quality they offer them for free to us. I can only be grateful, keep up the amazing work and thanks for providing to us really valuable information in such a beautiful way.
250million years, I would see dinosaurs😋😋
At 2:07 "50 kilometres in diameter" and then shows the rock spinning for 10 seconds heating in Earth's atmosphere by friction. Come on people, blast the cobwebs out of your brains. At 50 km diameter the rock strikes Earth when the top of it is 50 km up precisely at the top of the stratosphere where the mesosphere starts. The top of the rock is practically still in space when the bottom of it hits Earth. If you saw it from a commercial jet at cruising altitude you'd see it hit Earth far far below (below the clouds) and look up to see it extends up 5x as high as your jet. This pulverizes and vaporizes billions of tonnes of solid rock. Can you imagine how it just punches the atmosphere out of the way in a fraction of 1 second as though air was identical to the vacuum of space, which it is to this rock. The Chelyabinsk asteroid was just 18 m in diameter. He's saying this rock is 50,000 metres in diameter. Meteor speed is 11-72 km / second so if this one was 40 km / second and 50 kilometres in diameter then it's closest point reaches the top of the stratosphere where the air density is 1,290th of the air density you are breathing at the surface. It's essentially still in space, then all of 1.3 seconds later it smashes into the ground and it punches out air for the entire troposphere for the 50 km diameter like it didn't even exist, sending a pressure wave around Earth's atmosphere. You see a rock in space above and 1.3 seconds later it's all over. Check how long 1.3 seconds is on your cell phone stop watch. This ain't no pissy little baseball spinning for 10 seconds heating in Earth's atmosphere by friction.like in the video Otherwise, good interesting video nicely crafted. Omitted the big, long, interesting atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) event before humans started the even funner one. Starting 82,000,000 years ago the plate with India on it barrelled north east from Antarctica to Asia at a blistering 8" year churning up the sea bed and releasing CO2 for the 30,000,000 years until India smashed into Asia. By then it had raised atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) to a huge 1,000-1,800 ppmv which transformed Earth's climate into a "hot house" with 12 degrees higher Global Mean Surface Temperature (GMST) than now, at 52,000,000 years ago, then India was slowly shoving up the Himalayan mountains & Tibetan Plateau for millions of years (it still is) and the added rock weathering helped to take out atmospheric CO2 for 47,000,000 years until it had dropped all the way from 1,000-1,800 ppmv to 280 ppmv when it was cold enough for orbital & tilt cycles to trigger the glaciation period "Ice Ages" there's been for the last 5,000,000 years. Fun stuff.
You rlly like numbers, dont you
I found it informing on some level's, also noticed how it never mentions the possibility if Human's could be speeding up this process. An I have to say I don't have a clue about the numbers an Co2 levels and such, but if this guy really knows his facts and nobody here can state otherwise. I'm gonna take it as mostly factual with an emphasis on natural climate change happening faster everyday now, because it's supposed too...
Sooooooo... what's your point?
8:58 What an amazing graphic! is that really how the currents are flowing? And if so I want to see a video about that.
You have some of the best narrators for your videos.
This and entire history of the universe, S tier
His voice is perfect for these videos.
Cakefish I think it’s Keith David (Dead Presidents, Something About Mary, They Live...).
Another excellent piece as always. Keep up the good work :3
Very impressive video,great job!
โฐ่ง
*/ดั้นเจี้ยน/โฐ่ง*...//....//....
*/หลั้กฐาน/โฐ่ง 2 แท่ม*
*/เอ่กส่าร/โฐ่ง 3 ใบเบิ้ล*
*/หนั่งสือ/โฐ่ง 5 เล่ม*
*/ภาที้/โฐ่ง 2 ที้ที้*
*/โอ็ษ/โฐ่ง 4 อัน*
ความ
*/หลั้กฐาน/โฐ่ง 1*
ติ,ตำหนิ้
*/หลั้กฐาน/โฐ่ง 2*
บู่ง
*/เอ่กส่าร/โฐ่ง 1*
ลาค
*/เอ่กส่าร/โฐ่ง 2*
รี่ย
*/เอ่กส่าร/โฐ่ง 3*
พะร
*/หนั่งสือ/โฐ่ง 1*
ดุค
*/หนั่งสือ/โฐ่ง 2*
อัพ
*/หนั่งสือ/โฐ่ง 3*
ล
*/หนั่งสือ/โฐ่ง 4*
บ
*/หนั่งสือ/โฐ่ง 5*
ช่าร
*/ภาที้/โฐ่ง 1*
ล่าร
*/ภาที้/โฐ่ง 2*
จาข
*/โอ็ษ/โฐ่ง 1*
ล
*/โอ็ษ/โฐ่ง 2*
ถ
*/โอ็ษ/โฐ่ง 3*
งาฃ,สั่ญญ๋าน
*/โอ็ษ/โฐ่ง 4*
534237 โฐ่ง
*/ดั้นเจี้ยน/534237 โฐ่ง*...//....//....//....
*/หลั้กฐาน/534237 โฐ่ง 2 แท่ม*
ค
*/หลั้กฐาน/534237 โฐ่ง 1*
ง
*/หลั้กฐาน/534237 โฐ่ง 2*
Incredible.
This taught me many things I didn't know--and the music was subtle.
Thank you very much for clarifying what I've seen elsewhere on youtube and reddit about the western sheet. Also, I had NO idea that the Permian flood basalt eruption was caused by an asteroid on the other side of the planet!
thedebateroom That’s scary stuff!
Whoever the narrator is... he's amazing... best to go to sleep
Dick Rodstein is his name and he is the man
I know! I fall asleep to this guy all the time.
I learned alot about the universe falling asleep to his narration in the space videos! Very relaxing!
Thanks for another great video.
Liked that video. Thanks
Have you heard of the website called "The Truth Contest"? Check it out and make sure to read the current first entry: "The Present".
That solves the California and coastal city problem. Too bad about Florida and Hawaii.
Antarctica’s sea ice set a record this week, reaching 815,448 square miles (1,312,000 square km) of ice above its normal range. Melting from beneath the Antarctic ice shelves. Scientists claim it is then re-frozen back on surface, increasing sea ice.
thank u for the teachings
Although i prefer the more "outward" space related videos, these ones are also interesting and well edited. And the comment section is always fun to read. Its like watching a UFC match, with the only difference that the combatants arent martial arts experts but only random anonymous dudes on the internet taking swings at each other with the "Verbal - Hammer" :D
I know...what's up with that? Most of the comments aren't really people wanting to share thoughts and opinions in a productive way. Mostly people wanting to complain about the opinions of everybody else negatively....why? It's a shame.
You guys have great documentaries but there should be a lot more posted.One every 4-6 months.
Earth will evolve just as it has done over billions of years. Nothing we can do except accept fate as it comes
At 6:45 if Australia was pushed by the impact away from Antarctica then why is it moving soo fast? Was there an (Lava Lamp) upwelling from below which is mainly pushing them apart?
You know, I wouldn't mind reading a soft-sci-fi novel about an explorer of the submerged cities.
Great piece!!
At about 6:00 this reminded me of a Lava Lamp but I wish I could see all of it instead of just one Hemisphere. Maybe translucent Green for this side so one could see the Red on the back side?
IM HIGH
Who else watches these types of documentaries to fall asleep
I always enjoy these documentaries, even if they do give me a somewhat bleak view of our future.
Any generation's misfortune means powerful opportunities for many other people. Wealth, prosperity constantly shift, as do minor wind/ocean currents. Supply and demand, survival of the fittest (physical as well as mental). Opportunities... Opportunities :>)
There is not one doomsday scenario portrayed today, that is not human contrived in order to shift wealth. Trick is to follow the trends and invest in the upward, divest before the fall. The natural occurrences of catastrophic proportions (Siberian Traps) are the unpredictable wild card. Reason investors are gamblers. 'Know when to hold 'em, know when to fold'. Sometimes losers... sometimes gainers.
Big Dinosaurs became losers (some smaller varieties became chickens... we eat 'em:>). The big boys, the star players could not accept/adapt to change. Their DNA got too comfy ...
don't worry. a bit more heat is not that bad. if you payed attention it did say that we are still living in an iceage. besides. it can't melt. not all of it at least. even mercury has icecaps.
szeredai akos yeah, thank god for mercury icecaps, opps i said a bad word...
szeredai akos Venus doesn't have icecaps.
Cosmic Willpower Mariner V finding indicate that it does. it is not a certainty though.
That's a data visualization galore !
Здравствуйте Уважаемый Канал, можно узнать откуда летит астэрод и его биографию? спасибо большое.
Excellent synopsis. Thank you!
i've been wondering, are they including isostatic movements of the continents due to loss of mass(ice) in these calculations for rising see level's?
Considering they have GPS capable of measuring within 1 meter. I would think that they do indeed account for isostatic rebound.
Antarctica bushed over like a rainforest that would be something
Summary: "The East Antarctic ice sheets are in balance. However, there's a volcano rising from the deep under the Western Antarctic ice sheets causing melting from the underside. ...But let's claim that the melting is from human activity because that's what the environmental alarmists that are paying us want to hear"
what is the song at 19:50? It's a piano peice.
Great video can someone tell me the name of the music he uses? Like the one around the 9 minute mark?
I don't know
what is the soundtrack list playing in this video ?
Finally!
Soooo interesting.
Great Job
Thanks for amazing video!
We need to start moving our costal cities inland if the ice continues to melt and the sea levels continue to rise, there’s really no other way around it. We need to be proactive about it instead of reactive because if we don’t get out ahead of this trend then by waiting too long we’ll be wasting our time trying to save something that can’t be saved. We can’t ever abandon living on the costal areas of land but serious measures will have to be taken to properly monitor the changes that areas like Antarctica and the Arctic are experiencing in order to continue living on the cost, cities will have to be reconstructed with rising sea levels in mind.
But your high priest, Al Gore bought a beach property.
It is so sad to see why people just don't understand what they have been doing to this world we all live in. They take this world of ours for granted and think someone else will clean our mother earth. When you realize you have been eating garbage you created yourself and your body starts to fall apart because of it. Just blame yourself for that. You did it and your mother always told you to clean up your room. You still won't do anything about it. WOW!
Thanks
I think you're confusing GRACE: Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment-a mission that orbits Earth and is expected to deorbit sometime in 2015 or 2016-with GRAIL: Gravity Recovery And Interior Laboratory-a similar mission to the Moon that ran from March to December 2012. Same sort experiment, very different locations, slightly different acronyms.
I'm a little surprised the writer and the voice performer didn't notice the discrepancy between the acronym and the expansion when reading it aloud.
The chemistry of the rocks in Antarctica is similar to rocks in North America. Antarctica was joined with North America at one time; probably when Pangea existed and later.
If the object that impacted the earth from space had that much velocity, would it not also fracture the mass ? It does not seem to make sense that it would not damage the entire earth just layers of it
Great on history, but where is the "Fate of Antarctica" I kept waiting for?
+Hudspethtb Well for ice we're at 3-ppm/year hundreds of times faster than nature so puts us at 800-ppm within 130-years where all Antarctica's ice will melt off, it really starts going at 600-ppm and the bonus is killing any meaningful coral reefs globally as we fly by 750-ppm.
Nature takes a lot longer to change CO2, long-term Pleistocene average is 1-ppm/1000-years, big jump at the end of the ice-age 1-ppm/180-years for metrics.
So the message is we're committing to add over 70m/230ft of sea-level with business as usual doesn't matter how long it takes apparently.
Right now at 410-ppm we've committed to 25m/82ft of sea-level, it's only how fast and nothing is being done to slow it down, eh?.
That 'fate' is a group of three sister penguins, spinning threads made of herring gut, each of which foretells the fate of.... Oh, yes. Right. Scratch that.
They make it into super sized Margarita. And we all get seriously wasted.
I heard that Antarctica vaporizes in 5,000,000,000 years but I think that's just alarmist propaganda to get my tax money to stop Antarctica (and Earth) vaporizing.
life has survived and flourished for the last 2 billion years through far worse - i still have hope!
Excellent proffessional presentation. You guys are amazing at telling scientific stories!
I would imagine that as the ice melts off of Antarctica, Antarctica may bouy up a bit. I wonder if that was considered in any of these "calculations" presented in this production. Life is so complex...
Really good documentary
12:08 losing ice on one side and gaining on the other could also confirm the pole shifting theory. Any comments on this?
The reversing of the magnetic poles has nothing to do with the amount of ice.
You say reversing though doesn't this mean that while it is happening a shift of the planet's axis is occurring meaning the exposure to the sun is different and therefore certain cold areas get heated more?
ceaos Când ai impresia că ești sigur de ceva s-ar putea că de fapt nu știi nimic, mai ales în cazul tău.
Ciprian Ionut Eu nu am impresii, nu am convingeri, nu am pareri. Eu nu cred in nimic. Ma conformez cu realitatea. Adevarul este testabil, verificabil. Daca dai unui extraterestru planurile unei Dacii, tot Dacie ii iese. Sau poate ca am lasat loc de un misto cu Dacia...
It is time that the scientists in space clearing their mess they leave behind in their studies. This also contributes to global warming. Scientists know exactly what happened that the earth is warming in recent years. But instead of that they save the earth and work for peace, they are now looking for other habitable planets.
I have faith in humanity that we will be able to build sea walls and simply adapt.
Intorducing... Antarctica, my friends. :D
1;20 That there is New Zealand bush ...
Try this . Ever wonder what happened to atantice . The moon pangea there's a large piece missing .
The o-zone layer is healing up. Less radiation into the air = Less melting! :) :P
Tracklist please?)
250million years, I would see dinosaurs😋😋
Florida man get your water wings on!
Haha I’m in Florida rite now 😂
Hear a chunk of ice the size of road island just tore off. yeah the planet is getting hotter
Antarctica will completely melt.
252Ma meteorite leads to Permian extinction. Antarctica splits from Gondwana at130Ma. That is 120 million years later than the East Antarctic meteorite. It is hard to see how the two could be related as is proposed in this otherwise excellent video.
Just reported last year Antarctica ice increases at an alarming rate triple the normal.. And a new record low of -144° below zero.. Why ??
The decreasing Sun's irradiance, and "greenhouse" gas theory is bunk.
thank you for uploading a new video ! don't listen to M Alexander ... he doesn't appreciate this magnificent documentary
The music makes me want to fall asleep
Stop lying about our earth demons because we live in a dome and firmament created by our creator and heavenly father yahuah YAH
How much ice was gained in East Antarctica? They only talk about lost ice. Does anyone know?
I always wonder how different the world would be if antarctica were located higher up, where it wouldn't be a frozen wasteland. Or, if Pangea retained its structure. History would sure be different, and so would modern animals.
its good to live in a city 2300 mts above from the sea level :)
With Radiometric Dating, when the dates match the theory, they are shown in textbooks, published in papers, shown religiously in museums, and aired on t.v. When the dates kinda match, they are put in the footnotes. When the dates don't match at all, they're simply thrown out. Radiometric Dating rests on unproven assumptions and a sample can be tested hundreds of thousands of times and out of all those times, only 3 dates will match the evolution religion, yet that is enough to "prove macro-evolutionism through radiometric dating."
I think Antarctica would have fully melted around the time the new Pangaea Ultima has formed. But thats just my theory... Especially when you consider how large of a continent Antarctica is.
The universe is in a constant state of change. Humans have nothing to do with it.
I think climate change is pretty much inevitable, because people drag their feet about things until they're forced to change. For example, I'm a big fan of water conservation, but I still love my hot showers. The only things that could prevent it would probably be green tech becoming as economical, and as profitable, as fossil fuels. Ultimately it'll probably be a good thing because it'd make us become efficient enough to actually be self-sustaining. Plus, it'd be cool to have enough land exposed in Antarctica to colonize it. :)
I'm not worried.
Music is too loud; hard to understand.
just one thing i noticed you didn't include in this, and that is ice displaces sea water once it melts it isn't the same volume that ice displaces, and the fact the new snow and ice falling and forming at the heads of the glaciers, come back out of the weather cycle, i haven't seen any scientific calculation which include these factors, just ones from climate alarmists stating the whole of the ice melting being the whole of sea level rise.
maybe if they where more honest and forthcoming with their hypothesis and calculations in detail they'd be ore believable.
I often wonder why the creators of most, if not all documentaries, insist on some inaccurate information as well as omitting some critical to more truthful reporting.
1/. The Earth was much smaller & with much less water when the first plants, insects & animals appeared. Initial growth in diameter & water was primarily from meteorites, small comets & asteroids, although large asteroids such as the one in Central Australia known as Uluru (Ayres Rock), which has at least 2/3 below the ground, have made larger contributions.
2/. The tectonic & volcanic plates are the result of a major collision in the Pacific Ocean region, which also caused the Earth to be tilted.
Each time the planets dominate the same side of the Sun, such as currently, the slippage of the Tectonic Plates slows while the Volcanic activity greatly increases. This includes the Antarctic Region which has at least one Super Volcano heating the ice above it.
Also the Pacific Ocean volcanic rift has increased its rate of expansion. It is where the newest & most abundant land mass is being formed, albeit deep below where no man has gone before.
3/. Fossil Fuels emit very little CO2, required by plants along with water & sunlight. They do emit CO, poisonous to all life.
In reality, the biggest danger to the planet from Greenhouse Gasses are Humans, who continue to clear rainforests & wetlands for industrial, residential & commercial development, obviously expecting farms & rainforests to proliferate in the deserts of the world.
4/. A partial solution to the problems Humans have created is for us to excavate suitable areas of the deserts in order to live, & to some extent work, underground where the temperature would be stable. Above ground could be used for heavy industrial as well as solar power stations. Wind turbines could be used to pump water from dams as well as air in to the underground cities while other wind turbines pump the waste air, water & sewage above, the latter 2 along with solid food waste sent to designated areas in the hope some of the desert may become an oasis. Once such works are completed then would be the task of returning parts of the urban centres back to the rainforests they once were, while other parts used to grow the food we will need to survive.
"The Earth was much smaller" - BEFORE 4.55 BILLION YEARS AGO, when it was still accreting solar system material.
It then LOST and GAINED material when it collided with another planetoid to form the MOON during the period known as the HEAVY BOMBARDMENT, which finished around 3.8 BILLION YEARS ago, a date coincident with the beginning of life on earth. It was then the size it is now.
This life remained unicellular, bacterial, for THREE BILLION years, before becoming sexual and diversifying into plants, animals, and three other genera.
Stop spreading disinformation.
Ayers Rock is not a meteorite.
@@robertfindlay2325 That's exactly what I was going to type; Uluru is not an asteroid or meteorite Alan you've got your wires mixed up there mate. It's the biggest rock in the world.
1/ Correct, the Earth was smaller (200 million years ago), probably the size of Mars now, but the expansion was/is caused by Earth's plasma core inflating.
Gravity is a phenomena of electromagnetism, not mass (Electric Universe Theory). The Earth's surface gravity then would have needed to be around half its current value to have allowed the very large dinosaurs to have existed.
3/ Oil and gas are not "fossil fuels", they are abiotic, created geothermally from rocks containing hydrogen and carbon. The are no "greenhouse" gases, a gas cannot trap heat, heat flow can not be one way like glass in a real greenhouse.
4/ The Sun's irradiance has reduced (Grand Solar Minimum), and the Antarctic's ice has increased to record levels. The danger now is the little ice age that's starting.
Top job, SpaceRip. If this doesn't put the wind up climate change nay-sayers, then nothing will.
It's a very cold wind, the Antarctic ice is now grown to record levels.
The antarctic might melt.aye i agree. Betcha the ice reforms some where else thou.
No. Not until next ice age..millions of years later....man will be gone.
Thank you so much for pronouncing both Cs in Antarctica.
When I hear people skip the first C, it makes me want to slap them very very hard.
There is a rendering mistake in the world view shown at 8:53. At this time, New Zealand did not yet exist, but its forebear, the continent "Zealandia" was extremely prominent, and was between 8 and 12 times the current size of New Zealand. All that's shown is the sunken remnants of two mountain chains.
New Zealand ALWAYS gets shafted by film producers; either left out entirely, or shown incorrectly over time. *sigh*
SO SAD TO SAY, BUT WE'VE REALLY SCREWED THE POOCH, as far as saving the ice of Antarctica. By helping whatever natural, dynamic temperature inversion that was occurring under the ice sheets 100's of feet of packed ice over the ocean that extended far off land, it's past the point of no return. And runaway melting has begun. The 'cork' holding back the vast inland ice fields behind a span between two mountain ridges, the 90% of fresh water held back in fields 2 - 3 miles thick will accelerate moving & melting. As the ice melts, we lose the albedo effect by exposing dark green dark blue ocean water to the sun's rays, its heat is absorbed, warming the water, resulting in melting more ice. The same for ice melting over land. It absorbs the sun's rays instead of reflecting back out to space (the albedo effect) and it starts a self-reinforcing loop, melting ice faster, making water warmer, making water expand as it warms, causing loss of our coastal lands. It also increases moisture available to make storms stormier. Hurricanes will be warmer, larger & more destructive...just as they strike land. Thunderstorms will be more severe. Monsoon seasons are worsening each year due to more & more atmospheric moisture absorption. Glacier will soon be gone. In my lifetime, Glacier National Park in the US had 100's of glaciers. Soon, there won't be much of anything left. 30 - 40 yrs ago, I used to sled down glaciers in the Sierra Nevada mountains, home to Mt Whitney, the highest mountain in the lower 48 states in the US. It used to have snow up there all year round. Mammoth Mountain, in CA. used to have skiing till 4th of July...in T shirts & jeans. Chicks in bikinis. Now, it's maybe 2 months of OK skiing, then it's man-made trails of snow on brown hills once you are off the snow path. I remember 20 yrs ago, the Mammoth Village had 25 feet of snow at 9,000" & they had to dig DOWN to people's roofs. Driving the main road was just the street with a 25 ft wall straight up the right side of the road & 25 ft wall on the left side of the road. A vertical wall of snow made a street canyon with right angles!
It's not all gonna go in 10, 20, 50 years. Maybe not for 100, but surely by 200 yrs. It's already leaving. The SW US is in a 20 yr MEGA drought, but there's been a record-breaking 2,000 yr drought ebbing & flowing. But it is going, going, soon to be gone. And it'll be gone until Mother Earth decides to change it. Because...Ooooh, we've recked it. And we will never be able to fix it. Whoever is left will be fucked b/c we wrecked it today. And it's shame on us. I'm so glad I decided to not have any kids. And I feel bad for my brothers & sisters, and their kids, my nieces & nephews.
This guy sounds like Saruman
*Wait, do you mean that it's **_NOT_** Christopher Lee narrating??* 😲
It’s already weighing in the water so then no sea level increase
Antarctica has never been so vast since records began. !!! why are people not talking about this ! they only show the ice bergs melting in the north pole. what are they up too !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
music again fkt up a good video
Amazing how true this video has proven to be. Amazing also, though sad, is the section of comments with legions of imbeciles offering uninformed and unwanted opinions that only demonstrate how stupid they are.
The Antarctic's ice has now (2019) increased to record levels !
Stress creating violins at start.
I wonder what those scientists wear to keep warm.
They wear kilts under their Antarctic gear. Can't beat it for warmth but don't ask, it embarrasses them.
I for one, am looking forward to a warmer world, it's damn cold in this one.
You'll get your much warmer world some day because we all end up in that same place.
Well, you feeling warmer isn't what's going to happen, which is how US education (probably) has failed you,and you've failed yourself.
When I can get a good tan on some tropical island near the north pole. It will be paradise.
Babbling idiots don't convince me either way.
My President would easily say "Bukan urusan saya.."
well it 9 years later and not 1 inch higher in water level
1:20 so ice melting is just part of the cycle
Hay let's send mccoverup there and never let him leave. Don't give him a coat.
Subtitles dile ro vlo hoto
use votch.tv or another video translating website