If Ukraine loses the odds of every type of war rises including in Taiwan. No one wins in war but it is possible to have "peace" and lose. During soviet imposed famine under Stalin Ukraine was at "peace" but lost more people than many a war. This war was not a choice for Ukraine. It was imposed by Russia.
As people will always seek advantage when they can alliances are necessary. If everyone could live in their own box and not cast envious eyes on the neighbours then no wars. But humans, even animals aren't like that. Something to do with evolution.
Hope we never have to see this conflict because it would not end well for anyone. NATO is the stronger than Russia as a whole but, Russia is a nuclear power. If Putin faces an existential crisis I wouldn’t doubt that he would use a nuke to deter a NATO advance on Moscow. This would bring about a nuclear holocaust. We all lose!
The African Bushmen win, because they don't notice anything about the World War. If everyone else died out, they would still live in the jungle in their mud huts without a care in the world xO
@@adamadamovich8788 you sure cause you cant even spell soldier buddy. also they know that because statistics and observations done by the US and other countries.
@@Wadd3yYT I'm guessing English is not his first language. Try spelling, conjugating, & declining Russian words correctly. I don't know how their current war has affected the overall numbers, but what we have seen indicates much of their weaponry is indeed outdated. More concerning for Russia is that their training standards don't even rate to the older Soviet standards.
@@katarinab6728 , blame your school, maybe. Or is it parents? "And imagine all these resources poured into non military economy!" "Imagine" is a verb that means to form a mental image or concept of something that is not present or has not yet been experienced. It is often used to describe the act of visualizing or conceptualizing something in one's mind.
Oppenheimer tells Einstein that, "When I came to you with those calculations...we thought we might start a chain reaction that would destroy the entire world." Following a pregnant pause, Oppenheimer adds, "I believe we did."
They took a "calculated risk" at Los Alamos that the first nuclear bomb test wouldn't ionise the atmosphere. But they didn't know for sure. Tricky physics.
One good news for NATO: "Hungary’s Parliament Approves Sweden’s NATO Bid After Stalling Budapest had been the final obstacle to the Nordic country’s joining the alliance, which has been trying to isolate Russia over its war in Ukraine." (New York Times, 02-26, 2024)
That would be the Russians - NATO Countries are too full of snowflakes that will not fight. Mark Twain said - "It is not the size of the dog in the fight but the size of the fight in the dog."
Парни, мне нравится такое отношение к нам по конвенциональному расчету. Древняя техника, Онли конспритс и призонерс. Блен, пусть так и думают. Мы ждем всех великих вояк из могучих экономик, котрые шерли энд обвиос справятся даже без сша!
@@taand4725 To vote against a person who protects Donbass and Lugansk from shelling by the Kiev regime, which has been shelling civilians in these territories for 8 years, means not to respect oneself.
так экономика не работает. люди работают на заводах ВПК, за что получают деньги, люди служат в ВС и используют технику произведенную ВПК за что тоже получают деньги
I'm American. But I think both countries are bad a$$ and forces to be recon with. Love to both my country and Russia.💜 Prayers for all of our safety during these rough days when our leaders wanna flex their strength and put us all in danger.
The problem with purchasing power parity is it fails to take into account Quality of Life and quality of product availability...... Sure a Russian can purchase a washer - drier cheaper than a German but a piece of sh*t is a piece of sh*t no matter the cost savings ...... You put up a Russian manufactured device vs a German manufactured device the German device is in an entirely different league
@@longjohn526quality ! That is what russia lacks big time ... none of their shit is good .. from weapons to cars to everything ! I would rather live in congo than russia ... 3th world piece of shit .. that is what russia is ...
All of which totally ignores the fact that the vast bulk of NATO's firepower exists in the USA and is not likely to be deployed in Europe as much of it will need to be held in reserve against the high probability of opportunistic conflict with China in the event of war in Europe. This completely changes the complexion of the whole scenario and NATO's chances of outmatching Russia in the field would be greatly reduced.
on otherhand if there were a conflict between Russia and NATO, Russia would not have all of their troops in Europe either, otherwise China would totally go for cheeky landgrab
@@kili2403 The USSR was at war with Afghanistan - it was a guerrilla war. As for Finland - the Soviets offered them an exchange of territories to protect themselves from the coming war - the Finns refused. Thus, the Soviets had no other options but to use force. The result was much worse for Finland than the original proposal. And after the war, no one could stop the USSR if it wanted to conquer Finland. The Finns knew this perfectly well, so they switched sides at the very end of the Second World War.
If the Russian aircraft carrier is still on his list, what is the function of equipment that not works and the vaporised tanks and armoured vehicle’s, artillery are still in this comparison. Russians don’t have 42 AWACS , this was maybe the end of he Cold War .. Please give us an update with he real 2024 numbers
You would think along those lines when your only sources of information is Western propaganda. If all what you wrote was true, then Why can't NATO kick Russia out of Ukraine?
@@itsme-gm9oi Pourquoi les États-Unis n'ont pas réussi à empêcher la France de tomber contre l'Allemagne nazie ? Tout simplement parce qu'ils n'étaient pas en France, et même pas encore en guerre C'est littéralement ce que tu as dis, on n'est pas en Ukraine ! 😂
By 32 countries combined 🤣🤣🤣now lets see whats military power of russia, china, india, brasil, indonesia, venecuela, iran, etc. COMBINED Russia still has more nuclear power than all of nato, better weapon and better trained military, which is the most important.
This discrepancy is precisely why a war between the two powers is out of question. It would end in Armageddon and no one wins. Russia is not stupid, it won't surrender just for ecological or humanist reasons. That being said, those numbers are theoretical to say the least. There is strength on paper and strength on the field. And most importantly, there is military industrial production. NATO may seems mighty on paper, but seems to have difficulties to provide Ukraine with simple artillery shells and basic ammunitions. NATO has a great military budget, but has to pay three time the price for each tank, planes, missiles because it has to buy them to private capitalist companies. Russia military complex is state owned, it won't have to pay profit margins. Reality is that no European power has prepared itself for a long term war. The logistic and the industrial bases are not there. Europe lacks basic commodities while Russia has them all, the USA would be too far from the frontline to compensate, while Global South would revolt and cease deliver the commodities needed for Europe to sustain a war. And if by any luck, nukes are not used and Russia is really close to defeat, I bet China would intervene, annihilating the only the true advantages still has, that is the NAVY and Airforce. That some of our leaders are envisioning this possibility is beyond me. my 5 cents
I'm not trying to saber rattle for the use of Nuclear weapons, or to diminish the gravity of Nukes, but Nukes do come in different sizes with different ways to detonate. It would still be scary to contemplate, but this is why different styles of Nuclear Weapons were shown. They are not all Hiroshima leveling style- big boys. The tactical nukes would be, well tactical. (still not a pleasant thought)
Comparing conventional weapons makes no sense if both sides have a chance of dying in a common nuclear catastrophe. Then, in the ruins of New York or London, you will remember that you had several thousand more airplanes? It's just ridiculous
In an age where anti missile defenses are reaching almost 100% accuracy, we will soon reach a day where nukes may just be treated as nothing more than really, really scary missiles that will never hit anything. I wouldn’t even be surprised if classified technology has reached the point where even ICBMs can be shot down.
CSTO is nothing more than just the hierarchical relation between Russia and other small nations. Indeed, Russia was not care about the territorial dispute in Armenia.
Six out of the ten largest economies on Earth are NATO countries. They mostly have voulnteer militarikes composed of professionals who have signed on for and trained for years using the most up-to-date military technlogy. CSTO is a motley collection of poor and weak Third World countries. They would have no chance unless they fight like the Taliban.
@@りょうた-c3m But Nato is also is nothing more than just the hierarchical relation between Usa and other small nations. Indeed, Usa was not care about the territorial dispute between Greece and Turkey
Насколько российское оружие реально и реально работает говорит второе место в мире по поставкам вооружения или вы считаете всех покупателей российского оружия идиотами которым не куда девать деньги.
@@sadeeshagunathilaka7199Вы просто не понимаете что сейчас по факту "русские рубят русских" Для русских украинцы практически не чем от нас не отличаются, соответственно мы себя сдерживаем, хотя и с каждым витком всë меньше и меньше. Киев древнерусская столица, в Киево-печерской лавре похоронены русские богатыри защитники земли русской о которых рассказывается в русских сказках, наконец Киев это русский Иерусалим. Но я тебя уверяю если конфликт перекинется в Польшу или Румынию, или не дай Бог во Францию или Англию, то разговор там будет короткий, никаких сантиментов или иллюзий мы к вам не испытываем.
Russian numbers are vastly over-counted and don't include the massive losses at the hands of Ukraine. Even so, Russia is totally outnumbered in quantity and quality.
❤Россию её мощь!!! Она всё сметёт на своём пути!!! Ваша НАТО для великой России 🇷🇺 не проблема. Россия 🇷🇺 в любом случае выстоять сможет она богата ресурсами . Никогда не дооценивайте Россию, типа она слаба , она ведёт себя как пружина и в любой момент может выстрелить на удивление врагам.
Wenn der Westen so schlecht ist: Warum fahrt ihr unsere Autos, kauft unsere Kleidung, unsere Computer, unsere Cellphones, liebt unsere Marken und Statussymbole? Habt ihr denn nichts eigenes? Zum Beispiel russische Rolex, Mercedes, Sony, Gucci, Nike, Adidas, Lamborghini, Siemens, Apple,…. Nein. Habt ihr alles nicht. Kein Problem, euer kleiner Präsident ist sehr reich und wird dafür sorgen, dass Russland viele dieser Marken verstaatlicht 😂😂😂😂
@@leviathan-tk7rz HAHA!! Russia is the second strongest army in Ukraine right now. Now into its third year. The ideological war was already won years ago. The dumb ass putin doesn’t realize that people prefer freedom & democracy over a dictatorship. Russians don’t like thinking for themselves, they want someone to think for them-putin, the little putz. Enjoy your slab of fat, potato, and vodka…🤣😂
@@leviathan-tk7rzoff course they can stop the Houthis but no one is interested in a regular invasion where they hide between civilians and a long term presence is needed.
@@alpearson9158 Russia completely blocks GPS anywhere it has military, and uses Russian Glonass technology that transmits simultaneously on 14 different frequencies.
@@victorhopper6774 It works. Glonass 3rd generation was released a couple of months ago. HIMARS aren't working because they're based on GPS, but Russian missiles and glide-bombs are hitting their targets because they use Glonass Gen 3.
iam not from Russia. but most of my good friends that i met was Russians and Ukrainian they are really good people to me. very nice. beautiful eyes and smile and happy to socialize with... from Philippines
It would be wrong to compare NATO with Russia, just as NATO is a multi-member defense organization, it should be remembered that it is a collective defense organization that includes Russia, and in the event of a conflict, perhaps China and North Korea will also support this organization. All the necessary conditions for the outbreak of a new big war are about to be created, the West must now take steps for peace in Ukraine, which it has prevented before, otherwise it will cost the West as much as it will cost Russia.
Сравнивают 51 страну с 1 страной, объективно... и смеются что какие сильные.. умники удачи вам у нас есть сармат который любую проблему решит в перевесе сил.. Про ОДКб забыли🤗😆😆😆
Same komentarze "love rusia" "support ukaine" ani jednego "love earth love all people support each other" mam nadzieje ze kiedys ludzkosc sie zjednoczy i zamiast wydawac pieniądze na broń nowej generacji czołgi samoloty bedziemy dążyć do samodoskonalenia się by rozwijac nauke medycyne byśmy mogli kiedys opuscic nasza planete i znaleźć nową bo jak tak dalej pujdzie to ziemia stanie sie naszym grobem...
@@qba4104 rozumiem cie masz rację ale jesteśmy też istotami inteligentnymi nasze życie nie skupią się tylko na przetrwaniu jeść pić spać srać jak inne zwierzęta. Ludzie rywalizują ze sobą we wszystkim i dobrze dzięki temu nie "stoimy" w miejscu tylko się rozwijamy szkoda tylko że narody swiata głównie rywalizują wojskowo każdy się chwali zobaczcie mój czołg :P szkoda ze nie chwalą się np zobaczcie opracowaliśmy skuteczny lek na raka albo opracowalismy bardzo wydajne odnawialne i tanie źródło energii. Wiem fajnie się pisze takie moje małe marzenia;) trzymaj się kolego powodzenia
@@mateo0608 Sprzeczne interesy pomiędzy państwami były zawsze i czasami doprowadzały do wojen. Przetrwanie i rozwój z założenia zależy od ekspansji, więc konflikty są nieuniknione. Nawet w teorii nie ma takiego scenariusza, w którym na całej Ziemi zapanuje pokój.
Il faut le dre à ce monstre de Poutine qui envoie par centaine de milliers des russes et autant d' ukrainiens dans la tombe . Ce type est un lâche sans une once d'humanité il faut se rappeler le Koursk .
Your video does not take into account the war in Ukraine where Russia lost around 2800 tanks and 11,000 armored vehicles and 440,000 soldiers more than a hundred planes and 2 radar planes
Thanks for this interesting video! It would a bit more informative, to look at the comparison of the east and western blocks. May be that a miilitary conflict between NATO an Russia will expand to a global conflict.
@@kili2403 Je pense que tu es imbécile, ce n'est pas la quantité. C'est ce que le pays a comme moyen. Les pays de l'Afrique, un seul pays possède des armes nucléaires l'Afrique du Sud. En Amérique à part les USA aucun pas n'a l'arme nucléaire. En Asie, 4 ou 5 pays alors, la personne a raison quand elle a dit un pays contre tous.
😂😂😂und vor allem die ängstliche und unterdrückte Bevölkerung, die nicht mal in der Lage ist sich gegen einen kleinen Mann zu wehren, der sich auf ihre Kosten bereichert, weil sie alle Angst vor diesem Zwerg haben. Oder vor seiner Bande von Alkoholikern😂
Just so you know, nobody outside of Russia thinks that way about you guys. We all beleive/know that your soldiers can be bought off with a carton of cigarettes and a liter of vodka.
Russia has lost a lot of tank and soldiers including war equipment. These figures for Russia is a lie cos the last time I checked, the US alone got a lot of Nukes more than Russia, so how come Russia outmatch NATO. 2:012:012:01
Not profitable for russia since what they are hitting with them is worth less than the missile. Kinda like how russia uses tanks to intercept drones worth a fraction of the tank
Russian Hypersonic weapons are not real, say its best buddy, CHINA. THEY SHOULD INCLUDE ALL OF THE CGI WEAPONS SUCH AS THE SU-57. 10 SU-57 in 3 years. wow.
Wow! some comments are boostful about how Russia doesn't stand a chance, forgetting it's a stand alone country versus 30+ plus countries. And those numbers in certain key areas aren't that extremely high.
Cecenia , Iran , Korea nord , china , etc ..Russia is not a country, it is Colonie a federation of over 100 countries, Russia is just a stolen territory with annexed countries and treated as colonies without rights ,
Before war they had 10K tanks. Now they have 15K. It is their war econom. They did not lost a single tank and made 2,5K tanks per year. Trust me bro, Russian told me this :-)
Att he current rate it will take Russia 50 years to get to Kyiv. Russia would have you believe their economy is indestructible even after it collapsed only 30 years ago. History repeats itself.@@dale5497
"1 из НАТО уничтожает 20 из России" вы откуда такие расчëты берëте? Почему ни абрамсы, ни леопарды не помогли Украине, челенджеры вообще до фронта не доехали и минимум 2 были уничтожены, почему ПВО патриот даëт 30 пусков по ОДНОМУ кинжалу и не сбивает его, а становиться его жертвой, в чëм превосходство техники НАТО?
@@Chita_visla начнем с того, что ничего из новейшего вооружения в украину даже не попадает. выделяются деньги, которые направляются различным частным и гос оборонным предприятиям стран нато и сша, а в замену в украину списывают ржавое барахло старых модификаций + бывшие селюки мягко говоря плохо обучены для управления данной техникой так как нет времени для этого. так что поводов для гордости мало, плюс российские новейшие танки горят не хуже в эру дронов это не новость. про пво вообще молчу, чего только стоит удар по британскими ракеты Storm Shadow по штабу Черноморского флота в крыму где концетрация пво самая высокая в мире. и спорить на этот счет можно бесконечно, только реальный конфликт блока и рф покажет кто чего стоит
@@VETMOSNAKE давно 2А6 и Strv122 стали древним мусором? Это одни из последних модификаций леопарда, про ПВО, 1 удар за всë время сво? Больше похоже на человеческий проëб, плюс есть видосы, где в Белгороде панцирь отрабатывает по 16 целям и по 16 попадает, на контрасте вспоминается Патриот с его 30 пусками по кинжалу и последующую ликвидацию этим же кинжалом
@@VETMOSNAKE ну и про горят не хуже, чего же до этого были оры, про машин"ужасные совково-российские" танки, которые горят как спички в отличии от западных, а после позорного поражения западных образцов пошли разговоры о "ну пук-среньк, на войне вся техника горит, нет неуязвимых машин"
GUI. BUM....BOOM.. AND WHAT DO YOU DO..... WITH ....THE CHINESE..... ....WELL ...THEY DO NOT COUNT AT ...ALL... RIGHT.... BYE GREETINGS FROM 4785,000,000 ASIANS....
that's the question isn't it. Why Warsaw pact failed? Why no one would join Russia anymore? I know you won't answer these questions because you're on the losing side.
Сколько воинственных комментариев, а сколько из вас реально готовых взять оружие в руки? Может узнаете почему поляки скупают недвижимость в испании?)))
Interestingly, there are many comments that these figures are no longer relevant due to the losses of the Russian army in the current war, but no one (or almost no one) says that NATO is also losing equipment, and sometimes officers, in the war in Ukraine
@@user-aero68 Yes, and the Russians have also lost the Death Star, all their spaceports, they have run out of missiles and are about to run out of tanks. Man... You'll have to agree among yourselves about the losses of the Russians. I constantly see completely different information about this from various pro-Ukrainian media
Get used to it. These "poor downtrodden countries" (they've still somewhat downtrodden, but less and less poor, and "rich and democratic" - on the contrary) are holding a grudge against West. So... something coming.
@@Stereozentrum Dude tell's you to buy new phone with translation capabilty. MONEY, do you have it 🙂? He doesn't speak English, so? Are we all obliged to speak it, massa? Wait till you need to speak Chinese, you arrogant "ubermench"...
Really, so why is it destroying NATO equipment on an industrial scale? Do you just repeat what fanboy youtube channels tell you, or do you actually read specialist publications? If you did read specialist sources, you would know that Russian equipment is very advanced, in some areas, far more advanced than anything the west as.
Takie porównania są bezsensowne bo rosyjskie czołgi są na miejscu, a amerykańskie za oceanem. Pod bachmuten amerykańska marynarka walczyć nie będzie (Rosja ma połączenia lądowe z odbiorcami i dostawcami) więc przewaga w okrętach ma takie samo znaczenie jak przewaga w ilości kusz i łuków bloczkowych.
Tu découvre que l'otan n'est pas en guerre avec la Russie, c'est la propagande de poutine affirmant que l'otan se bat en ukraine contre la Russie alors que l'aide se limite à des milliards $
How have they failed? They have mostly completed their objectives. Securing the 4 new territories. No one knows Russias casualties, so how do you know? Do you have inside information?
@@itsme-gm9oi Absolument toutes les manœuvres militaires des premiers jours de l'invasion traduisaient d'une tentative de guerre éclaire On est presque à trois ans ! 😂
Teste di cazzo Aggiungete con la Russia,la Cina,l,Asia,la Corea del nord,l,Iran,l, Africa è altri stati e vedrete delle belle come andrà a finire la Nato
La Russie à la taille de 100 pays , dans l'otan le luxé comme par exemple,la Belgique,les Pays-Bas,les petits pays des balkan, et des pays baltes donc normal
With geopolitics in the state they are, you need to add in China, the Middle East, India, Brazil, North Korea, African nations in to Russia’s figures, because that is how polarised the world is right now! And I bet the comparison wouldn’t favour us in NATO very much at all!
Brazil is an ally of the US and would remain neutral, India won't get involved because they hate China and are interested in doing business with the West, North Korea and African nations are a total non-factor. The most powerful country in the Middle East is Israel which is a US ally, the second most powerful is Saudi Arabia which is also a US ally. China is the only economy that can threaten the US, but they certainly wouldn't jump gung ho into a war with the West if it weren't for their own interests (like going for Taiwan) because their economy simply depends on Western trade to survive. The US is the richest country in the world and the EU is the largest economic bloc in the world after the US, and militarily NATO is simply unmatched. Russia loses just as hard even if you add all that
But are those nations you mention "real freinds" or friends that will wait until the outcome seems obvious before they pick side? especially Africa to me seems to be unable to do much once all western aid stops and neither Russia, China, India and certainly not N. Korea have the financial muscle to compensate
Brics is an economic alliance, not a martial one. Certainly countries like India have no reason to join Russia and Iran wants te keep it's head down in internal strife. They saw their neighbour Iraq getting clapped twice in a very short period so probs don't want the same experience.
@@HOTROD864 Read my answer again. Some members of NATO have nuclear weapons but they are under national control. NATO as an organization only have one (1) military unit. The E3 Sentry (AWACS) in Geilenkirchen. Stop being an idiot and do some research.
@@anordman9659 The same can be said for pretty much all of Nato's manpower and equipment. Each country decides for itself if and what to contribute to Nato should article 5 be triggered.
Ничего удивительного Франция создавая свои ракетные технологии и атомное оружие, и атомную энергетику опиралась первоначально на технологическое сотрудничество с СССР. Великобритания же вообще по факту имеет американское ядерное оружие которое она купила, а не создала.
How do you know how many Russia has lost. The only figures we have come from UKR and it is in their interests to vasly exaggerate in order to keep western money rolling in.
You mean Shangai Cooperation ??? It's not a military alliance... They work together on few subjects and that's all. You really think they will create a military alliance with Pakistan and India together ? China and India are opponents too... It's a joke bro. Russia is alone. China would send few $ and that's it. India is buying European weapons more than Russian. Pakistan is too busy to fight Afghanistan. Ok we can count Belorus to make you happier 🤣
Surely those Russian numbers are out of date?
Current
@@oldtimer3180unlikely
@@oldtimer3180 yes, currently out of date...
Yeah they need to subtract a few AWACSki’s
They may count rusty scrap métal soviet éra stuff and the scrap one that Ukraine take care of to.
Thanks!
🎉
Thanks
No one is winning..the world will lose😢
If Ukraine loses the odds of every type of war rises including in Taiwan. No one wins in war but it is possible to have "peace" and lose. During soviet imposed famine under Stalin Ukraine was at "peace" but lost more people than many a war. This war was not a choice for Ukraine. It was imposed by Russia.
As people will always seek advantage when they can alliances are necessary. If everyone could live in their own box and not cast envious eyes on the neighbours then no wars. But humans, even animals aren't like that. Something to do with evolution.
Hope we never have to see this conflict because it would not end well for anyone. NATO is the stronger than Russia as a whole but, Russia is a nuclear power. If Putin faces an existential crisis I wouldn’t doubt that he would use a nuke to deter a NATO advance on Moscow. This would bring about a nuclear holocaust. We all lose!
The African Bushmen win, because they don't notice anything about the World War. If everyone else died out, they would still live in the jungle in their mud huts without a care in the world xO
loose?? word is LOSE
Alert, the totals for Russia as of today are drastically lowered from this presentation
how do you know?.....I am ex soviet army solder, YES, most of russians weapon is simply old garbage......
@@adamadamovich8788 you sure cause you cant even spell soldier buddy. also they know that because statistics and observations done by the US and other countries.
@@Wadd3yYT I'm guessing English is not his first language. Try spelling, conjugating, & declining Russian words correctly.
I don't know how their current war has affected the overall numbers, but what we have seen indicates much of their weaponry is indeed outdated. More concerning for Russia is that their training standards don't even rate to the older Soviet standards.
Where is your source then? You know they are always producing more, right?
Alert, the totals for NATO as of today are drastically lowered from this presentation
And imagine all these resources poured into non military economy! 😮
Si vis pacem, para bellum
@@katarinab6728, errare humanum est.
@@TroyQwert so where exactly am I mistaken?
@@katarinab6728 , blame your school, maybe. Or is it parents? "And imagine all these resources poured into non military economy!" "Imagine" is a verb that means to form a mental image or concept of something that is not present or has not yet been experienced. It is often used to describe the act of visualizing or conceptualizing something in one's mind.
@ert guess what - I know, what 'imagine' means. However how is this related to your statement 'errare humanum est'?
Oppenheimer tells Einstein that, "When I came to you with those calculations...we thought we might start a chain reaction that would destroy the entire world." Following a pregnant pause, Oppenheimer adds, "I believe we did."
Think that tells you a lot about how governments feel about their people.
They took a "calculated risk" at Los Alamos that the first nuclear bomb test wouldn't ionise the atmosphere. But they didn't know for sure. Tricky physics.
THIS 2 ZIONIST JEW ,THE GOOD IS GOD CHOSEN RACE AND THE BAD DESTROY THE ENTIRE WORLD AND THE OTHER SHREWED,GREED & INSTIGATOR???
One good news for NATO: "Hungary’s Parliament Approves Sweden’s NATO Bid After Stalling
Budapest had been the final obstacle to the Nordic country’s joining the alliance, which has been trying to isolate Russia over its war in Ukraine." (New York Times, 02-26, 2024)
And you think you will get from Sweden ?? 😂😂😂
They asked us to join what are you expecting from them?
Veey bad news for Swedes
so neutral
And how is the future for Sweden ?.🤣🤣
Humanity needs to stop all this! WAR IS ALWAYS SHIT!!!
Humanity is a pile of tripe.
Va dire ça à Poutine
@@EpuluMkuluba lai detto ha Baden?
Tell that to the girls and boys, men and women being raped, tortured and executed in Ukraine.
@@AntonioFeliceDedoni Ce n'est pas Biden qui a envahit l'Ukraine!
No doubt who is the stronger. Q: are the russian numbers before ukraine invasuon or current?
Clearly figures are from before the 7 day special military operation.
That would be the Russians - NATO Countries are too full of snowflakes that will not fight.
Mark Twain said - "It is not the size of the dog in the fight but the size of the fight in the dog."
before, and even that was fake.
These numbers are the highest estimates before the war, and those numbers included all units, even those rusting in storage facilities.
Yes numbers are before therefor whole video has no point
Парни, мне нравится такое отношение к нам по конвенциональному расчету. Древняя техника, Онли конспритс и призонерс. Блен, пусть так и думают. Мы ждем всех великих вояк из могучих экономик, котрые шерли энд обвиос справятся даже без сша!
НАТО думали розсипатися, але все ж ворог дурний ще є
Anyone travelling to the Ukraine with a T-54 and T-55 already has powerful potential! And the Armata is already pausing at the parade in Moscow 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@driver01german So why Ukrs are losing? Did the've "learned" from you, Germans, how to lose big time 🙂?
@@timur3505 Just a quick question... What nationality are you? This would make my answer to your question much easier.
🤔
Если бы все эти деньги были отданы людям то каждый житель этой планеты жил бы в достатках и ни в чем не нуждался.
If more people in Russia stood up to Putin, we wouldn't be in this mess
That is not how the world works buddy, not at all.
@@taand4725 To vote against a person who protects Donbass and Lugansk from shelling by the Kiev regime, which has been shelling civilians in these territories for 8 years, means not to respect oneself.
так экономика не работает. люди работают на заводах ВПК, за что получают деньги, люди служат в ВС и используют технику произведенную ВПК за что тоже получают деньги
@@taand4725 бидона и зелю смести
I'm American. But I think both countries are bad a$$ and forces to be recon with. Love to both my country and Russia.💜 Prayers for all of our safety during these rough days when our leaders wanna flex their strength and put us all in danger.
NATO vs. Russia would be over in 9 hours. That's 5 hours to put gas in tanks and pull on uniforms, and 4 hours to drive from Poland to Moscow.
Hello, nice video, a short comment about budget, in general costs, could be interesting to indicate the purchasing power parity
😂
The problem with purchasing power parity is it fails to take into account Quality of Life and quality of product availability...... Sure a Russian can purchase a washer - drier cheaper than a German but a piece of sh*t is a piece of sh*t no matter the cost savings ...... You put up a Russian manufactured device vs a German manufactured device the German device is in an entirely different league
@@longjohn526quality ! That is what russia lacks big time ... none of their shit is good .. from weapons to cars to everything ! I would rather live in congo than russia ... 3th world piece of shit .. that is what russia is ...
All of which totally ignores the fact that the vast bulk of NATO's firepower exists in the USA and is not likely to be deployed in Europe as much of it will need to be held in reserve against the high probability of opportunistic conflict with China in the event of war in Europe.
This completely changes the complexion of the whole scenario and NATO's chances of outmatching Russia in the field would be greatly reduced.
This is one of the rare smart comments...spot on!
on otherhand if there were a conflict between Russia and NATO, Russia would not have all of their troops in Europe either, otherwise China would totally go for cheeky landgrab
@@lattekahvi1298 If there will be conflict between Russia and NATO China will not "landgrab" Russia, but instead will join against NATO - that's it.
La Russie galère face à l'Ukraine, elle ne pourra simplement pas s'occuper de la quasi-totalité des pays de l'Europe 😂
@@lattekahvi1298 "...China would totally go for cheeky landgrab..." - West always tries to apply his (imperialist) way of thinking to others.
Приходите, места (2,5м²/человек) хватит всем 🤗
в украине вам и этого не дают.......
@@MOBILI-LAB
Уже более 750.000 российских фашистов сдохло в Украине , сотни млрд долларов потрачено на эту войну!!!!!!!!
А результат????????????
@@MOBILI-LAB
На эти деньги 💰 можно было построить огромное количество школ, больниц и общественных туалетов!!!
Imagine...all that money going towards space exploration.
We've Enter Andromeda lol
Russia has no chance against NATO countries... But let's hope Peace wins...
У России не было шанса с Карлом Двенадцатым, с Наполеоном, с Гитлером.. Но как то им не свезло, а ведь как шли к успеху...
La Finlande et l'Afghanistan n'avaient aucune chance contre l'URSS, et pourtant...
@@kili2403 y ont gagne 😁
@@kili2403 The USSR was at war with Afghanistan - it was a guerrilla war. As for Finland - the Soviets offered them an exchange of territories to protect themselves from the coming war - the Finns refused. Thus, the Soviets had no other options but to use force. The result was much worse for Finland than the original proposal. And after the war, no one could stop the USSR if it wanted to conquer Finland. The Finns knew this perfectly well, so they switched sides at the very end of the Second World War.
Don't be stupid, it's not going to be war like it is now. Think about it. You push someone to the wall, see what will happen.
This’s not about power, it’s about decisive weapon.
If the Russian aircraft carrier is still on his list, what is the function of equipment that not works and the vaporised tanks and armoured vehicle’s, artillery are still in this comparison.
Russians don’t have 42 AWACS , this was maybe the end of he Cold War ..
Please give us an update with he real 2024 numbers
So, Mr. Putin. Russia is outmanned, outgunned, outflown, out-manoeuvered, outspent and, ultimately, overwhelmed.
Wow you're so tough on your keyboard
You would think along those lines when your only sources of information is Western propaganda. If all what you wrote was true, then Why can't NATO kick Russia out of Ukraine?
@@itsme-gm9oi Pourquoi les États-Unis n'ont pas réussi à empêcher la France de tomber contre l'Allemagne nazie ? Tout simplement parce qu'ils n'étaient pas en France, et même pas encore en guerre
C'est littéralement ce que tu as dis, on n'est pas en Ukraine ! 😂
U r too outspoken, Oreshnik was designed with people like u in mind😅
By 32 countries combined 🤣🤣🤣now lets see whats military power of russia, china, india, brasil, indonesia, venecuela, iran, etc. COMBINED Russia still has more nuclear power than all of nato, better weapon and better trained military, which is the most important.
Весь бы этот потенциал на благо людей...а не мерить друг другу письки, и не портить экосистему
Haben Sie schon mit Putin darüber gesprochen ?
This discrepancy is precisely why a war between the two powers is out of question. It would end in Armageddon and no one wins. Russia is not stupid, it won't surrender just for ecological or humanist reasons. That being said, those numbers are theoretical to say the least. There is strength on paper and strength on the field. And most importantly, there is military industrial production. NATO may seems mighty on paper, but seems to have difficulties to provide Ukraine with simple artillery shells and basic ammunitions. NATO has a great military budget, but has to pay three time the price for each tank, planes, missiles because it has to buy them to private capitalist companies. Russia military complex is state owned, it won't have to pay profit margins. Reality is that no European power has prepared itself for a long term war. The logistic and the industrial bases are not there. Europe lacks basic commodities while Russia has them all, the USA would be too far from the frontline to compensate, while Global South would revolt and cease deliver the commodities needed for Europe to sustain a war. And if by any luck, nukes are not used and Russia is really close to defeat, I bet China would intervene, annihilating the only the true advantages still has, that is the NAVY and Airforce. That some of our leaders are envisioning this possibility is beyond me. my 5 cents
Thanks for one of the few sensible comments.
You are being real. The wee boys who are impressed by these vids are living in a fantasy world.
But you forget that the West have richest People in the world. Rotschild, rockefeller etc... If they want they can buy everything they want.
So just let Putin and Xi do whatever they want? And the fat little dude in N. Korea. What do you propose? Please enlighten us with your wisdom.
I'm not trying to saber rattle for the use of Nuclear weapons, or to diminish the gravity of Nukes, but Nukes do come in different sizes with different ways to detonate.
It would still be scary to contemplate, but this is why different styles of Nuclear Weapons were shown. They are not all Hiroshima leveling style- big boys. The tactical nukes would be, well tactical. (still not a pleasant thought)
Comparing conventional weapons makes no sense if both sides have a chance of dying in a common nuclear catastrophe. Then, in the ruins of New York or London, you will remember that you had several thousand more airplanes? It's just ridiculous
In an age where anti missile defenses are reaching almost 100% accuracy, we will soon reach a day where nukes may just be treated as nothing more than really, really scary missiles that will never hit anything. I wouldn’t even be surprised if classified technology has reached the point where even ICBMs can be shot down.
Why is Putin always telling your people he is afraid for NATO ?
In your world Russia does not need an army at all ..
Then stop the fighting
Sowas kann nur ein ängstlicher Russe schreiben.
Can you please make NATO vs csto I subscribed
CSTO is nothing more than just the hierarchical relation between Russia and other small nations. Indeed, Russia was not care about the territorial dispute in Armenia.
Six out of the ten largest economies on Earth are NATO countries. They mostly have voulnteer militarikes composed of professionals who have signed on for and trained for years using the most up-to-date military technlogy. CSTO is a motley collection of poor and weak Third World countries.
They would have no chance unless they fight like the Taliban.
Central Asia countries are backyard of China now.
And what about 'Russia+China vs Nato' Comparison ?
@@りょうた-c3m But Nato is also is nothing more than just the hierarchical relation between Usa and other small nations. Indeed, Usa was not care about the territorial dispute between Greece and Turkey
The question with Russia is how much of their equipment is real and actually works
Good question, Probably the best one i've read so far.
Probably 20% :D
Насколько российское оружие реально и реально работает говорит второе место в мире по поставкам вооружения или вы считаете всех покупателей российского оружия идиотами которым не куда девать деньги.
@@СергейКосухин-э3э at least you guys admit that your position in the world. russia is a overrated one we can see it ukrain war
@@sadeeshagunathilaka7199Вы просто не понимаете что сейчас по факту "русские рубят русских" Для русских украинцы практически не чем от нас не отличаются, соответственно мы себя сдерживаем, хотя и с каждым витком всë меньше и меньше. Киев древнерусская столица, в Киево-печерской лавре похоронены русские богатыри защитники земли русской о которых рассказывается в русских сказках, наконец Киев это русский Иерусалим. Но я тебя уверяю если конфликт перекинется в Польшу или Румынию, или не дай Бог во Францию или Англию, то разговор там будет короткий, никаких сантиментов или иллюзий мы к вам не испытываем.
Russia has lost 50% of that in Ukraine. Any chance against NATO? NO
Null
Может попробуешь проверить?
Don't be stupid, it's not going to be war like it is now. Think about it. You push someone to the wall, see what will happen.
I still wouldn't underestimate them. I think nato would win, but it would be a terrible war, with millions lost. For what?
Russia Is Already In A War With Nato From Behind The Wall Brother If Ukraine Fight Alone With Russia The Ends In a month
Russian numbers are vastly over-counted and don't include the massive losses at the hands of Ukraine. Even so, Russia is totally outnumbered in quantity and quality.
quality - no
@@ghakon684 Yes. By far. Not even close.
@@ghakon684intelligence - no
But the ground reality is a lot of American weapons are destroyed in the Ukraine war.
@@noxiousgroup4474 Silly. A drop in the bucket.
❤Россию её мощь!!! Она всё сметёт на своём пути!!! Ваша НАТО для великой России 🇷🇺 не проблема. Россия 🇷🇺 в любом случае выстоять сможет она богата ресурсами . Никогда не дооценивайте Россию, типа она слаба , она ведёт себя как пружина и в любой момент может выстрелить на удивление врагам.
Bla, bla, bla 😂👎
C'est pour ça que ça fait 2 ans quelle fait du sur place en Ukraine ?😂
Et vous pensez réellement faire face à l'OTAN ?😂
Wenn der Westen so schlecht ist: Warum fahrt ihr unsere Autos, kauft unsere Kleidung, unsere Computer, unsere Cellphones, liebt unsere Marken und Statussymbole? Habt ihr denn nichts eigenes? Zum Beispiel russische Rolex, Mercedes, Sony, Gucci, Nike, Adidas, Lamborghini, Siemens, Apple,…. Nein. Habt ihr alles nicht. Kein Problem, euer kleiner Präsident ist sehr reich und wird dafür sorgen, dass Russland viele dieser Marken verstaatlicht 😂😂😂😂
@@zigomar-m2m В украине и войны то настоящей пока нет,так СВО.
@@Greg15354 а почему ты покупаешь наш газ,нефть,уран и прочее и где будут твои машины если Россия введёт хоть один пакет санкций?
Russia doesn’t have a snowballs chance in hell
@@leviathan-tk7rz HAHA!! Russia is the second strongest army in Ukraine right now. Now into its third year. The ideological war was already won years ago. The dumb ass putin doesn’t realize that people prefer freedom & democracy over a dictatorship. Russians don’t like thinking for themselves, they want someone to think for them-putin, the little putz. Enjoy your slab of fat, potato, and vodka…🤣😂
@@leviathan-tk7rzoff course they can stop the Houthis but no one is interested in a regular invasion where they hide between civilians and a long term presence is needed.
What say China ?
Yeah to bad alot of nato countries probably would back off when shit hits the fan. Nato doesnt work wel together
@@bhoogvliet the sht already hit the fan. Russia is losing troops 5 to only 1 for Ukraine
Where are the counts for the different missiles ? ( this would include air-launched hypersonic missiles )
APPARENTLY ALL EXPENDED AS NO WESTERN GPS PARTS AVAILABLE
@@alpearson9158 Russia completely blocks GPS anywhere it has military, and uses Russian Glonass technology that transmits simultaneously on 14 different frequencies.
@@SewTubular very outdated
@@victorhopper6774 It works. Glonass 3rd generation was released a couple of months ago. HIMARS aren't working because they're based on GPS, but Russian missiles and glide-bombs are hitting their targets because they use Glonass Gen 3.
@@SewTubular Himars aren't working? Video evidence says differently.
What's the name of the outro song?
iam not from Russia. but most of my good friends that i met was Russians and Ukrainian they are really good people to me. very nice. beautiful eyes and smile and happy to socialize with...
from Philippines
Thanks a lot
Миру мир. Большой Привет из России!!!
Dick head
Support Russia From Bangladesh 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺❤️❤️❤️🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🙋🙋🙋
Shut up motherfker. Putin is the most delutional president in history
You'll be sorry if you do, my little Deltaic dweller.
back to your sewing machine
It would be wrong to compare NATO with Russia, just as NATO is a multi-member defense organization, it should be remembered that it is a collective defense organization that includes Russia, and in the event of a conflict, perhaps China and North Korea will also support this organization. All the necessary conditions for the outbreak of a new big war are about to be created, the West must now take steps for peace in Ukraine, which it has prevented before, otherwise it will cost the West as much as it will cost Russia.
NATO je utočná organizace
You forgot to compare economic and financial potential of each.
Знаете вы не поверите, но война ведëтся не деньгами, а оружием и жизнями граждан, а электричество получают не из розетки.
@@СергейКосухин-э3э yeah we saw it in ukrain war .uu guys sttil couldnt to catch it lol
@@sadeeshagunathilaka7199?
Сравнивают 51 страну с 1 страной, объективно... и смеются что какие сильные.. умники удачи вам у нас есть сармат который любую проблему решит в перевесе сил.. Про ОДКб забыли🤗😆😆😆
Russia havent Friends....
Mon gars tu as 20 pays en trop ! 😂 L'OTAN c'est 32 pays pour l'instant !😂
Same komentarze "love rusia" "support ukaine" ani jednego "love earth love all people support each other" mam nadzieje ze kiedys ludzkosc sie zjednoczy i zamiast wydawac pieniądze na broń nowej generacji czołgi samoloty bedziemy dążyć do samodoskonalenia się by rozwijac nauke medycyne byśmy mogli kiedys opuscic nasza planete i znaleźć nową bo jak tak dalej pujdzie to ziemia stanie sie naszym grobem...
Dopóki będziemy istotami biologicznymi to będziemy się zabijać bo rywalizacja leży w naszej naturze.
@@qba4104 rozumiem cie masz rację ale jesteśmy też istotami inteligentnymi nasze życie nie skupią się tylko na przetrwaniu jeść pić spać srać jak inne zwierzęta. Ludzie rywalizują ze sobą we wszystkim i dobrze dzięki temu nie "stoimy" w miejscu tylko się rozwijamy szkoda tylko że narody swiata głównie rywalizują wojskowo każdy się chwali zobaczcie mój czołg :P szkoda ze nie chwalą się np zobaczcie opracowaliśmy skuteczny lek na raka albo opracowalismy bardzo wydajne odnawialne i tanie źródło energii. Wiem fajnie się pisze takie moje małe marzenia;) trzymaj się kolego powodzenia
@@mateo0608 Sprzeczne interesy pomiędzy państwami były zawsze i czasami doprowadzały do wojen. Przetrwanie i rozwój z założenia zależy od ekspansji, więc konflikty są nieuniknione. Nawet w teorii nie ma takiego scenariusza, w którym na całej Ziemi zapanuje pokój.
Лайков так мало и это плохо ,вы правы
Il faut le dre à ce monstre de Poutine qui envoie par centaine de milliers des russes et autant d' ukrainiens dans la tombe . Ce type est un lâche sans une once d'humanité il faut se rappeler le Koursk .
오 하느님, 제발 전쟁을 멈추게 인간을 회개하게 하소서🛐
Get out of here asian boy
The kintetic power comparison is pointless in this age where man has mastered the power of the atom.
True. Very scary times…
Do you see any atom bombs being used nine years into this invasion?
How many atomic wars since WW2 vs how many conventional wars ? Conventional wars are prevalent.
@@nicolasi1844 Yes they are. You have to seriously wonder what the point of nuclear weapons is if they are essentailly unuseable.
There is a third time for everything. If it keeps going the way it has been we might see the third time very soon.@@nicolasi1844
Any comparison of NATO and Russian military "power" that does not include will to fight is incomplete and irrelevant.
Spot on. nato will to fight is zero.
No more wars only peace ❤❤
Wars are better at settling scores than peace.
Kärleken vinner över ondskan. Älska mera och kriga mindre, kriga är för dom svaga individerna.
Kärlek över mänskligheten❤💪🇸🇪
That's...why we're men.
Many orthograph errors in the initial disclaimer = I'm off...
Your video does not take into account the war in Ukraine where Russia lost around 2800 tanks and 11,000 armored vehicles and 440,000 soldiers more than a hundred planes and 2 radar planes
440 000 soldier's??? Where did you get that number
@@MRLBRMNNfrom his stupid mind 🤯
@@MRLBRMNN Right? It's such a lowball estimate
Thanks for this interesting video! It would a bit more informative, to look at the comparison of the east and western blocks. May be that a miilitary conflict between NATO an Russia will expand to a global conflict.
How about Russia + China vs so called nato? 😂
Очень даже неплохо для одной страны, против половины мира.
La moitié du monde ? Il y a 32 pays dans l'OTAN pour l'instant, et 193 pays à l'ONU 😂
32 n'est pas la moitié de 193 😂
@@kili2403 Je pense que tu es imbécile, ce n'est pas la quantité. C'est ce que le pays a comme moyen. Les pays de l'Afrique, un seul pays possède des armes nucléaires l'Afrique du Sud. En Amérique à part les USA aucun pas n'a l'arme nucléaire. En Asie, 4 ou 5 pays alors, la personne a raison quand elle a dit un pays contre tous.
Не важно сколько у НАТО оружия и солдат .У них нет самого главного это Ген Победителя который есть в русском Духе 💪🏻🇷🇺❤️🙏🏻
😂😂😂und vor allem die ängstliche und unterdrückte Bevölkerung, die nicht mal in der Lage ist sich gegen einen kleinen Mann zu wehren, der sich auf ihre Kosten bereichert, weil sie alle Angst vor diesem Zwerg haben. Oder vor seiner Bande von Alkoholikern😂
Just so you know, nobody outside of Russia thinks that way about you guys. We all beleive/know that your soldiers can be bought off with a carton of cigarettes and a liter of vodka.
Russian spirit in a vodka bottle looking to steal the next laundry machine or TV
Russia has lost a lot of tank and soldiers including war equipment. These figures for Russia is a lie cos the last time I checked, the US alone got a lot of Nukes more than Russia, so how come Russia outmatch NATO. 2:01 2:01 2:01
Pre ukraine russia?
Pre-Ukraine ruᛋᛋia didn't exist.
NATO oh you I am proud why my country is on the best alliance in the world 🇬🇷
What about hypersonic weapons?
Not profitable for russia since what they are hitting with them is worth less than the missile. Kinda like how russia uses tanks to intercept drones worth a fraction of the tank
Russian Hypersonic weapons are not real, say its best buddy, CHINA. THEY SHOULD INCLUDE ALL OF THE CGI WEAPONS SUCH AS THE SU-57. 10 SU-57 in 3 years. wow.
Never use and i think usa have secret weapons
42 AWACS for Russia dont think so. What ever Russia reports half the number at least.
Wow! some comments are boostful about how Russia doesn't stand a chance, forgetting it's a stand alone country versus 30+ plus countries. And those numbers in certain key areas aren't that extremely high.
Cecenia , Iran , Korea nord , china , etc ..Russia is not a country, it is Colonie a federation of over 100 countries, Russia is just a stolen territory with annexed countries and treated as colonies without rights ,
And ? Usa is strongest than all africa or sud america
Если вмешается нато , я думаю ядерных ракет России хватит чтобы сделать из золотого миллиарда золотой слиток 😂😂😂
если русские применят ядерное оружие, американцы будут беспощадны и ответят ядерным оружием.
Nukes: I do not fear economy... economy fears me
SLAVA UKRAINE 💛💛💙💙
UKRAINE UK USA
Russian firepower looked like it was 2021. Pre-war figures. Tank numbers for example.
Before war they had 10K tanks. Now they have 15K. It is their war econom. They did not lost a single tank and made 2,5K tanks per year. Trust me bro, Russian told me this :-)
@@dallas1266 source: putins toilet paper
@@_.UA-camBad_. You read from his toilet paper? I'm almost sorry for ya... 😂
Poz. od Bugaria!🎉
What is this? An alliance of countries versus one country? 😂😂😂
Нет, это стая демократий защищается от одинокой тирании которая посмела иметь свои границы у демократических военных баз.
No, this is the West making sure Putin the dictator doesn't screw our people as he has Russians!
How many distroyed in Ukraine?
Lots !
Low ball 25%
High ball 50%
Canada’s contribution 2 jets when not in repair
Canada currently has 98 F/A-18 Hornets in service and 88 F-35s on order.
And some of the best snipers on the planet.
Apparently, their contribution to the effort is night vision goggles. It's important to see your retreat clearly, even in the dark.
Att he current rate it will take Russia 50 years to get to Kyiv. Russia would have you believe their economy is indestructible even after it collapsed only 30 years ago. History repeats itself.@@dale5497
Canadian force is just farce!
They have similar numbers in some field, but 1 from NATO destroys 20 from Russia. It's completely different state of mind.
"1 из НАТО уничтожает 20 из России" вы откуда такие расчëты берëте? Почему ни абрамсы, ни леопарды не помогли Украине, челенджеры вообще до фронта не доехали и минимум 2 были уничтожены, почему ПВО патриот даëт 30 пусков по ОДНОМУ кинжалу и не сбивает его, а становиться его жертвой, в чëм превосходство техники НАТО?
@@Chita_visla начнем с того, что ничего из новейшего вооружения в украину даже не попадает. выделяются деньги, которые направляются различным частным и гос оборонным предприятиям стран нато и сша, а в замену в украину списывают ржавое барахло старых модификаций + бывшие селюки мягко говоря плохо обучены для управления данной техникой так как нет времени для этого. так что поводов для гордости мало, плюс российские новейшие танки горят не хуже в эру дронов это не новость. про пво вообще молчу, чего только стоит удар по британскими ракеты Storm Shadow по штабу Черноморского флота в крыму где концетрация пво самая высокая в мире. и спорить на этот счет можно бесконечно, только реальный конфликт блока и рф покажет кто чего стоит
@@VETMOSNAKE давно 2А6 и Strv122 стали древним мусором? Это одни из последних модификаций леопарда, про ПВО, 1 удар за всë время сво? Больше похоже на человеческий проëб, плюс есть видосы, где в Белгороде панцирь отрабатывает по 16 целям и по 16 попадает, на контрасте вспоминается Патриот с его 30 пусками по кинжалу и последующую ликвидацию этим же кинжалом
@@VETMOSNAKE ну и про горят не хуже, чего же до этого были оры, про машин"ужасные совково-российские" танки, которые горят как спички в отличии от западных, а после позорного поражения западных образцов пошли разговоры о "ну пук-среньк, на войне вся техника горит, нет неуязвимых машин"
It's from your battle expirience? Or it's from Rambo movie or some of your favourite videogame? Grow up already!
RUSSIA IS GREATER IN ALMOST EVERYTHING BUT CANT WIN TO SMALL UKRAINE,,,,,,😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
small Ukraine with the most powerful land army in Europe? Try again
Biggest BS'ers biggest deniers
Aircraf carrier . 11 _ 1... lol... and for ever things... and the technology much better... to tank, to airplanes... NATO
GUI. BUM....BOOM..
AND WHAT DO YOU DO.....
WITH ....THE CHINESE.....
....WELL ...THEY DO NOT COUNT
AT ...ALL...
RIGHT....
BYE
GREETINGS FROM 4785,000,000 ASIANS....
32 countries compare to one country. And lets not forget the most important thing. THER WOULD BE NO VICTORS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
that's the question isn't it.
Why Warsaw pact failed?
Why no one would join Russia anymore?
I know you won't answer these questions because you're on the losing side.
The US doesn’t need NATO to hammer Russia & China simultaneously.
Yes it says NATO?
@@ElGranLibtardothe same US that got kicked out of Afghanistan right? The same US that lost to rice 🌾🌾 farmers in Vietnam right?.
@@Goku-mz2nc if you think you can draw parallels there, you’re not very bright
Сколько воинственных комментариев, а сколько из вас реально готовых взять оружие в руки? Может узнаете почему поляки скупают недвижимость в испании?)))
Interestingly, there are many comments that these figures are no longer relevant due to the losses of the Russian army in the current war, but no one (or almost no one) says that NATO is also losing equipment, and sometimes officers, in the war in Ukraine
Ukraine losing, but basement dwellers "soldiers" here are in another reality 🙂...
There are no loses in Russian army. The produce weapons like there's no tomorrow. More than nato combined. Go and check it out.
500k Russian casualties vs a handful (if any) nato advisors... seriously?
@@user-aero68
Yes, and the Russians have also lost the Death Star, all their spaceports, they have run out of missiles and are about to run out of tanks. Man...
You'll have to agree among yourselves about the losses of the Russians. I constantly see completely different information about this from various pro-Ukrainian media
@@saandr0070 That's blatantly untrue - the estimates from the UK, France, Germany and Ukraine all agree the figure is around 500k casualties so far.
Hilarious the jealousy in the comments from the poor downtrodded countries,against the fantastic rich democratic west.
Get used to it. These "poor downtrodden countries" (they've still somewhat downtrodden, but less and less poor, and "rich and democratic" - on the contrary) are holding a grudge against West. So... something coming.
17 aircraft carriers vs. 1 :D
Ну строго говоря у России нет авианосцев, а есть Авианесущий Крейсер. В чëм отличие Гугл в помощь.
@@СергейКосухин-э3э ENGLISH, do you speak it?
@@Stereozentrum Купи новый смартфон чтобы была возможность перевода, я английский не знаю.
@@Stereozentrum Dude tell's you to buy new phone with translation capabilty. MONEY, do you have it 🙂?
He doesn't speak English, so? Are we all obliged to speak it, massa? Wait till you need to speak Chinese, you arrogant "ubermench"...
A broken 1. lol
The advantage is overwhelming
😂😂😂😂
brutish brainwashed still believes Russian are losing in ukraine
So 🙂?
Putin would be totally crazy to attack a Nato member state...
Ever asked yourself why NATO wont fight Russia head on? Because they would lose. They are scared of Russia
@@itsme-gm9oi Tu as vu la vidéo ? Les chiffres ? Je ne crois pas, sinon tu ne dirais pas une telle bêtise 😂
Russia second in world? Really? Most of their armour rusted? Surely?
Really, so why is it destroying NATO equipment on an industrial scale? Do you just repeat what fanboy youtube channels tell you, or do you actually read specialist publications? If you did read specialist sources, you would know that Russian equipment is very advanced, in some areas, far more advanced than anything the west as.
Takie porównania są bezsensowne bo rosyjskie czołgi są na miejscu, a amerykańskie za oceanem. Pod bachmuten amerykańska marynarka walczyć nie będzie (Rosja ma połączenia lądowe z odbiorcami i dostawcami) więc przewaga w okrętach ma takie samo znaczenie jak przewaga w ilości kusz i łuków bloczkowych.
Przede wszystkim to Amerykanie zbombardują Ruskich do ery kamienia. Wojsko będzie tylko wymiatać co przeżyje.
Tu découvre que l'otan n'est pas en guerre avec la Russie, c'est la propagande de poutine affirmant que l'otan se bat en ukraine contre la Russie alors que l'aide se limite à des milliards $
End of the world 0:37
Can we lower Russia's numbers cos they've lost a load trying to take over Ukraine, and failed miserably
How have they failed? They have mostly completed their objectives. Securing the 4 new territories. No one knows Russias casualties, so how do you know? Do you have inside information?
@@itsme-gm9oi Absolument toutes les manœuvres militaires des premiers jours de l'invasion traduisaient d'une tentative de guerre éclaire
On est presque à trois ans ! 😂
Teste di cazzo Aggiungete con la Russia,la Cina,l,Asia,la Corea del nord,l,Iran,l, Africa è altri stati e vedrete delle belle come andrà a finire la Nato
Spain in 2024 pleise
its a midget not need to mention lol
"Pleise"? What's this?
cuando son mas de 20 paises vs 1, y aun asi Rusia los iguala y supera en algunos rubros.
La Russie à la taille de 100 pays , dans l'otan le luxé comme par exemple,la Belgique,les Pays-Bas,les petits pays des balkan, et des pays baltes donc normal
@@mfc4987 So, it's territory that matters, in your opinion 🙂? The population of Russia is at least 6 times smaller.
I think these numbers are off for Russia since 9 months ago, they have lost a lot on this list
With geopolitics in the state they are, you need to add in China, the Middle East, India, Brazil, North Korea, African nations in to Russia’s figures, because that is how polarised the world is right now! And I bet the comparison wouldn’t favour us in NATO very much at all!
Brazil is an ally of the US and would remain neutral, India won't get involved because they hate China and are interested in doing business with the West, North Korea and African nations are a total non-factor. The most powerful country in the Middle East is Israel which is a US ally, the second most powerful is Saudi Arabia which is also a US ally. China is the only economy that can threaten the US, but they certainly wouldn't jump gung ho into a war with the West if it weren't for their own interests (like going for Taiwan) because their economy simply depends on Western trade to survive. The US is the richest country in the world and the EU is the largest economic bloc in the world after the US, and militarily NATO is simply unmatched. Russia loses just as hard even if you add all that
But are those nations you mention "real freinds" or friends that will wait until the outcome seems obvious before they pick side? especially Africa to me seems to be unable to do much once all western aid stops and neither Russia, China, India and certainly not N. Korea have the financial muscle to compensate
@@birgerkagan6087 А Кто имеет ?
tf those middle eastern countries gon do they being used by russia and would likely take the chance to get out of their grip
Brics is an economic alliance, not a martial one. Certainly countries like India have no reason to join Russia and Iran wants te keep it's head down in internal strife. They saw their neighbour Iraq getting clapped twice in a very short period so probs don't want the same experience.
If there is a war without a nuclear weapon, Russia is not alone with it. Its strategic allies and friends will not betray it. I love Russia 🇩🇿♥️🇷🇺
You have no friends...
NATO💪💪💪💪💪💪
😂😂
pls do. Iran-china-north korea-russia-egypt-turkey- hezbola-housi-lebenan Vs Nato-israel
NATO does not have any nuclear weapons as an organization. However, some members have. Still a huge difference.
NATO does have nukes your wrong
@@HOTROD864 Read my answer again. Some members of NATO have nuclear weapons but they are under national control. NATO as an organization only have one (1) military unit. The E3 Sentry (AWACS) in Geilenkirchen. Stop being an idiot and do some research.
@SteakDiane again, all nukes belong to the nations. They are under national control. NATO has nothing to do with nukes. Learn some basic facts.
@@HOTROD864 nope, do some basic research before you write stupid stuff.
@@anordman9659 The same can be said for pretty much all of Nato's manpower and equipment. Each country decides for itself if and what to contribute to Nato should article 5 be triggered.
You do not have any idea about the power of India now. কিসের আন্তর্জাতিক কমিউনিটি ? ভারত আর চীনের জনসংখ্যা বাদ দিয়ে আন্তর্জাতিক মত হয় নাকি ?
I don't know about China but India is a pile of garbage
West still think's in their arrogance that only they've are counts 🙂.
And hypersonic missiles MHD ?
Unlike China supports Russia,🇨🇳🤝🇷🇺
South Korea always stand with NATO 🇰🇷🤝🇺🇸🇪🇺🇺🇦
与中国支持俄罗斯不同，🇨🇳🤝🇷🇺
韩国始终与北约站在一起🇰🇷🤝🇺🇸🇪🇺🇺🇦
I am not sure what would be worse between living under Putin's control or nuclear war!
31 vs 1 shame
1+china, North korea, Bielorussia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Armenia,mabye India , Iran,ecc,
😅
Rusia y Ucrania..... cobardes
@@cristiansotgiu6022 особенно Армения. вот если бы всех армян из Сочи и Москвы взять, то там да, надо охуеет
It's 32 already
NATO can destroy Russia just by deploying air force.
Dont forger china Korean with russia 💪👌
Россия уничтожила НАТО в 1812 году, потом в 1945 году и сделает это ещё раз, если вы этого так хотите, наверное время пришло
RUSSIA - Total tanks now - 200! 😁
I cari armati oggi sono superati contano poco, valgono più 10 doni da 200euro che un scerman
Surprise Russia had more nukes than us, France, UK combined
Ничего удивительного Франция создавая свои ракетные технологии и атомное оружие, и атомную энергетику опиралась первоначально на технологическое сотрудничество с СССР. Великобритания же вообще по факту имеет американское ядерное оружие которое она купила, а не создала.
Defo Nato wins fr
that’s not counting what Russia is loosing in Ukraine troops and equipment daily
What about what it's making daily
Russia daily DESTROYS NATO equipment in Ukraine. Remember this!
I like nato❤❤❤❤
московія не має шансу, як таке взагалі можна порівнювати, країну третього світу, і найвеличніший військовий альянс)
Half of them Russian figures would be pushing daisies by now
Dream on, twerp.
How do you know how many Russia has lost. The only figures we have come from UKR and it is in their interests to vasly exaggerate in order to keep western money rolling in.
idiotical comparison. we, as nato alliance, should be comparing ourselves to russia and its allies. not russia alone.
💯👍🏼
You mean Shangai Cooperation ??? It's not a military alliance... They work together on few subjects and that's all. You really think they will create a military alliance with Pakistan and India together ? China and India are opponents too... It's a joke bro. Russia is alone. China would send few $ and that's it. India is buying European weapons more than Russian. Pakistan is too busy to fight Afghanistan.
Ok we can count Belorus to make you happier 🤣
@@LCH974 wishful thinking is such a bad habit
@Navhaa That is based on facts. But im curious to read your explanation about a military alliance that includes Russia 🤣
Spot on
NATO = rich 👍
Russia = poor 👎
You d'ont visit a trailerpark.
Afghanistan = sandals
You're some kind of immigrant from poor country, pal 🙂?
Well we know Russia doesn't have very good logistics and it is said Putin still using Peter the great tactics.
Russia dont have 14.000 tanks stop lie!!!!!! They have less than 2000 now!
Kiev told you so?
@@adeboer1283 we are watdhing everything russia does
Ага, а ещё я слышал если сказать слово "верую" десять раз их станет 200.
OK, OK, just relax, you're going to have a stroke...
😅😅 no Russia stronger