The Risk Classic Tournament 2 R4 G1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 жов 2024
  • Risk UA-cam ► / thekillpetestrategy
    Twitch ► / thekillpetestrategy
    Discord ► / discord
    Instagram ► / thekillpetestrategy
    TikTok ► / thekillpetestrategy
    Patreon ► / thekillpetestrategy
    For Business & Sponsorship Inquires Email: thekpsmgmt@gmail.com
    Fan Mail: PO Box 87537 300 John St. Thornhill ON Canada L3T 7R4
    I am so grateful for your time, attention, support and kindness!
    Donations are never expected and always appreciated. Thank you!
    #Risk #RiskStrategy #RiskGlobalDomination #boardgames

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @shanesalyers5433
    @shanesalyers5433 4 місяці тому +9

    Purple really said 🥺👉👈 "If I feed you the magenta kill, will you give me second?"
    Regardless, GG!

  • @MermanTT
    @MermanTT 4 місяці тому +2

    Loved greens ending. Points for style!

  • @leovinci3149
    @leovinci3149 4 місяці тому +7

    The game was totally fed lol

  • @colehendrickson1846
    @colehendrickson1846 4 місяці тому +1

    Why did purple do that you had great position Pete!

  • @alejandrodelp7358
    @alejandrodelp7358 4 місяці тому +11

    Spoiler Blockerino neighborinoooo

  • @wittymickey11
    @wittymickey11 3 місяці тому +1

    Jesus loves you ❤️ Read the Bible

  • @tsherman393
    @tsherman393 4 місяці тому

    Purple............ 😮

  • @LithmusEarth
    @LithmusEarth 4 місяці тому

    Behind the scenes a 4v1, is actually a 3v1 at 89% and if you fail it it consecutively tries another 3v1 right? At least in true random, and it keeps iterating 2v1 and then 1v1 and then fail to take, but the chance to fail are low. Computer just makes it happen all instantly, unless you manual everything. Also at certain blitz levels 99% just becomes 100% right? where you just succeed for sure after a certain roll or something?

    • @LithmusEarth
      @LithmusEarth 4 місяці тому

      Purple's Play ended the game, with them getting second, damn.

    • @sobani84
      @sobani84 4 місяці тому +3

      If I remember correctly, in balanced blitz the odds are 'stretched' such that 85% chance in true random becomes 100% and 15% becomes 0%. The max you can lose is the amount of troops that are attacking.
      True random with a lot of troops is indeed the same as rolling a lot of 3v1s.

    • @wheelinshirt
      @wheelinshirt 4 місяці тому +2

      a 4v1 is actually a 3v1, since you have to leave a troop behind in the territory you're attacking from. Using 3 attacking dice vs 1 defending die is 89% win probability in true random, which balance blitz dice rounds up to 100%. With balance blitz dice, you will always win against a 1-stack with at least 4 troops in the attacking territory if you commit to the attack and you should never lose more than 2 troops. But you can lose a lot more than 2 troops, which makes no sense, hence people using the slider to fix the error in how they've set up the game. The slider should really only exist for extremely niche situations where you don't want to fully commit to an attack. Say, if you have two territories that can attack an opponent's territory, and you want to use troops from one of the stacks to pick away at your opponent's stack but not win, so that you can finish the attack with the troops from the other territory. But that's rare.

    • @LithmusEarth
      @LithmusEarth 4 місяці тому +1

      @@wheelinshirt I've seen pete use the slider so he could just throw troops away to reduce a stack without taking it to keep some one locked up or something. It happens and I always find it an interesting technique.

  • @QuangPham-ge6xn
    @QuangPham-ge6xn 4 місяці тому

    Another quick finish ..😢

  • @LCHEATERS
    @LCHEATERS 4 місяці тому

    top 50 gm got mad he was getting outplayed by a beginner in ranked so he sued into my cap and then botted out. Glad to know scumbags even at the highest rank. GG eLKOHLic LMFAO

    • @FreePete
      @FreePete  4 місяці тому +1

      It's not a great measure of skill to be top 50. Some people just play a lot on the same settings.

    • @LCHEATERS
      @LCHEATERS 4 місяці тому

      Thank you makes a little sense.