All of my film loading and developing equipment I bought at an estate sale from a photography teacher who retired from his position the same year I was born. Welcome to the future.
@@lolkthnxbai At first I read that as you saying you bought the gear at an estate sale the same year you were born. You must have been into this hobby a long time!
I use Fomapan 200 and develop with Rodinal. I print the best in my windowless bathroom darkroom on my Gnome condenser enlarger through Schneider Componon S enlarging lens. I use Ilford multigrade paper. I have been doing this since the 1960s when I was a hippie, now I guess I'm called a hipster. Oh yes and I play Vinyl, use a fountain pen and wear a mechanical watch. I am on trend with ccd sensor digital cameras like my Nikon D40x and my old 2005 Ricoh GR digital 8 megapixel camera. Peace brothers
@@Biosynchro if the person is willing to fork up the money to get a film photo session, then why is that a problem? if they were really in a dire financial state, they wouldn't have went with the most expensive option for their photos.
Great video - You could buy all the equipment (Tank, Changing bag, extension tubes, etc) for roughly the same as you already paid for the film + monobath, so the price per image is still only 0.20 moneys, and will decrease the more you use it!
85 bucks for the film loader, 10 bucks for 5 empty rolls, about 45 bucks for a film development starter pack plus whatever the scanning solution costs. but note that all of these costs will shrink comparatively the more you do it.
Imagine scanning your negatives with a film camera... The system has caught you again! :D The idea of bulk loading looks good, but you have to have cartridges too...
Blooming brilliant! We support u. Big up yourself m8! Actually, I did do this. The lab. My dad already had the gear. Even the print enlarger. Although I used my Nikon slide / film scan. Now I need to try that Ai thingy. It looks fun
In the 1970's Freestyle Sales Co. was my non-Kodak film supplier. The "Classic European black-and-white film" turned out to be Ilford HP3 and FP3. "East European black-and-white film" was ORWO, which worked just fine with D-76 1:1 for every film. I did try Agfa Rodinal, since ORWO films were said to be a better match. Bulk 135 film was advertised as "a Penny a frame" when Kodak was the Rochester Giant. These days, "do it yourself" still saves money and "electronic scanning" is an added thing that I could only dream about back then.;)
The GDR was seen as "Eastern Europe" in the US? (We're talking about the US, yes?) I didn't know that. Probably more of a political categorization than a geographical one since I assume West Berlin was still Central Europe for them. Orwo in Bitterfeld is located quite a bit more Western than Berlin 😁
Apparently it's still cheaper than shooting some of the other films, like the Polaroids and Instax films (although Instax might be about the same price as a 35mm frame processed and printed on a 4x6 or 5x7 print by a lab, although a lot of labs I'm seeing only send you digital scans and sometimes your negatives back, but no prints -- or it's extra to get prints). I would say even if you got just a bulk loader and film in bulk, that should cut down your overall cost by about 25% alone, but kep in mind that you'll have to invest ins ome tools to either get the film into cartridges or find a bulk reel for your camera, which not all cameras have.
Hey, rather than using AI to colorize your film, there's an alternative. It's slightly more time intensive, and uses 3x as much film, because you gotta take each picture 3 times in a row, but it works and all you need is some cheap clear colored plastic. Use the cheap clear colored plastic of red, green, and blue, as filters that go in front of the camera, one picture red, one green, one blue. your pictures will do best with a tripod for this. I don't know if it would be better to have the color screen/filters attached to the camera or tripod, i'm just going from an other video i watched, but once you have your red green and blue (or cyan, yellow, magenta, and regular black and white if you wanna have more crisp color for even more film use), you then digitally align them, and recompose from RGB or CMYK in something like GIMP (which is free). The 2 issues with this are that it uses more film per picture, and requires you take the exact same photo several times, which means no photographing anything that moves, unless you want absolutely strange technicolor ghosts. Personally I *do* want the strange technicolor ghosts, but that's just me. The way I learned this was from a video by Matt Gray (MattGrayYES) On how to use a gameboy camera to take color photos. the gameboy camera was 2-bit, 4-color grey-scale, and using red/green/blue filters in front of the lens, through simple multiplication, that's 64 colors that could be reproduced, and it worked. since B&W film isn't just 4 digital values, The colorspace is actually quite huge. His video referenced a photo taken with basically the same technique back between 1905 and 1915, and showed that photo from the library of congress, and it's gorgeous. back to this video, since you've split the cost of 3 rolls into 18 rolls, even using 3 shots per picture, it's still 7 rolls of color for the cost of 3, rather than 18 rolls of black and whites. Now, if it sounds like I don't have experience with actually doing this, it's because I don't. I'm in the process of trying to decide if I want to get into this as a hobby. Except instead of trying to take traditionally good photos, I want to take weird trippy looking photos by doing weird stuff with the film and possibly weird stuff with the developer. I saw a different video about making a film developer out of Vitamin C and Aspirin tablets disolved in something (video was by a channel called Flesh Simulator, and he also has a video on Infra-red color film techniques, though film isn't his main thing on the channel), and yet another video by another channel (thought emporium) about Microfilm and using it to create diffraction gratings. and it's just getting my noggin joggin'. I've also tried databending/datamoshing with digital cameras, and I'm curious what kind of weird stuff I could do with actual film. I'm just trying to decide if it's worth the initial investments for camera, developer tools, and the physical space that it takes up.
Funny thing is I got into film photography because I needed a cheap hobby. I get my Kodak Gold at the drug store for under $10, so it's like $20-$25 all in. My main hobby is firearms, with some of them costing around $2.50 a shot. Typically spending ~$300 per range trip, being able to take pictures for under $1.00 each is fantastic- and that's not even getting into the guns vs camera cost comparison. And dont get me started on night vision- those make Leicas look cheap.
People tell me "but film photography is soooo expensive". I'm on less than average wage for th UK and I shoot around a hundred rolls a year across multiple formats including 35mm, 120, super 8 and std 8mm cine. Like you I use 30m bulk rolls for 35mm and look out for deals on the other formats. I develop B&W myself and scan it myself. I am lucky that I have a lab I can walk to from home which will develop any colour film and scan for £6. It doesn't have to be expensive. And that gives me money for my other hobbies (vinyl records, reel to reel tapes, attending upwards of 60 gigs a year, camping).
I once bought 40 expired disposable cameras. I paid for them, if I remember correctly 10eur. Took the film canisters out of them, they where 400iso 12 exposures C41. I use them as iso 100-200, and develop in diy B&W developer. It doesn't get any cheaper than this.
if you wanted some sort of color without using ai you could use either bichrome or trichrome photography to get color (or pseudo-color in the case of bichrome) photographs, only problem is that it cuts the amount of photos you can take down to either a third or a half, all you need is a red green and blue filter for trichrome, or for bichrome, a red and cyan, orange and teal or yellow and teal/blue or, you could also use just a red filter and unfiltered as well. hope this helps, or at least doesnt hinder! :-)
Omg.. in Australia the most expensive country on earth, a roll of cheap 1shot film is $20 Kodak portra is around $50 and around $35 to get them scanned.
Using light meters with a film camera is like using a point and shoot digital one, you never have full control. IMHO you should learn how to shoot manual on a dslr/mirrorless first. Its much easier to learn how to get your exposure right when you have instant feedback.
There's another way to get cheap. If you're some point'n'shoot/street photographer and you don't need creamy boheh from some legendary vintage lens - go to 110 system for ex. Pentax 110 Super od Minolta 110 SLR. You can cut 120 roll film into 4 strips and load to 110 cardrige so you've get ~100 frames/1 medium format roll. You can shoot any type of film (also color) ~4x cheaper per frame than 35mm. MAKE 110 GREAT AGAIN! :P
I have had a much-loved Mju-II for the last 20 years, a Trip for 10 years and a Lubitel and I never use them because it’s too expensive and too complicated. No local labs any more. I have to do it all by post. Digital is better, overall, though it pains me to say it.
thanks so much for these tips felix! i got a free nikon fm2, and wanted to play around with it, inexpensively. you are way too funny i laughed through the entire video. im not even super into film but, subscribed!
The title really intrigued me until I saw the first 30 seconds. Please don’t get me wrong, the beginning was quite promising. But why should I buy a black-and-white film and then digitize it? By the way, photographing negatives with a digital camera and also using them up may seem like a good solution at first, but in the long run, it’s not very economical. The worst part is using AI to colorize black-and-white film; I might as well not bother at all. Analog presets in Lightroom make more sense, don’t they?
lustig !!! I was buying baulk in the 70s as a poor student. Now I old and I still poor lol, I sitting on a ton of old Kodak film and I got the same A1 not from my late mom. I did get a nice flatbed scanner, so i got that. I have Sony digital but I have been using the flatbed. Love the idea of cloericzed B/W film.
hilarious, entertaining, kind of accurate, now I feel like my time is worthless. Or is that priceless?😂😂😂 thanks for sharing, I’m going to buy 400 hotdogs worth of film now.
I appreciate the idea but for other then the experts already here your explanation will get lost by the many that really need it. In my view a great idea that was presented for those that already could do it without your help.
Are you interested in the myth of the Fuji Film Gx680 digital back? It was a digital image sensor that you could insert into the back of the Gx680 instead of a 120mm film, and in theory still shoot the camera setup digitally. This was only released in Japan in 2004, but it's nowhere to be found in second hand markets. I wish you could investigate or explore this myth.
There are a bunch of interesting contraptions like these from the era where film transitioned to digital. Leica did something similar with the R8 by offering a digital back, I would love to try one of those but they are very expensive on the used market unfortunately...
There was a kickstarter for something similar recently, I forgot the name of it but it's probably easy to find it. Ok, I googled, it's called I'm Back Film. But it's for 35mm.
bruh i calculated it with my camera and it went to $137,60 and it costs that much only camera, chemical, PATERSON 115 Universal Tank and one film roll ( damn.... )
I die inside every time i show my pictures. "I look horrible! It's not the picture though, it's just me". What do you mean you look horrible? You're fucking goregeous! But when showing film pictures i die inside at 50x speed. Shot a roll of ultramax, got 30 good pictures out of 36. My biggest "film success" and my biggest photography technical achievement got quickly turned off by a not so nice "Ew i look horrible" aka "Don't dare showing this to anybody". Never forget guys, a good rope will always be quicker and cheaper than photography.
Sorry we were not privileged! To know how to use one of those apparatuses on film where you didn't had a screen, but you had to use your eye, you had to have a sense of prediction to be able to capture the moment. Ugh, and you could not adjust the light so easily. I'm a sniper, whoop whoop.
![How Does Film ACTUALLY Work? (It's MAGIC) [Photos and Development] - Smarter Every Day 258](/img/n.gif)
Rolling your own film and developing your own negatives is taking me back to my student days… 20 years of technology and back to where I started
Life is going full circle until dying
All of my film loading and developing equipment I bought at an estate sale from a photography teacher who retired from his position the same year I was born. Welcome to the future.
@@lolkthnxbai At first I read that as you saying you bought the gear at an estate sale the same year you were born. You must have been into this hobby a long time!
Our schools completely skipped film photography ... damn commies xD
"you enjoy photography so your time's worth nothing"
bro I feel attacked 😭
Enjoy film photography* Just to add salt to your injury 😵
I use Fomapan 200 and develop with Rodinal.
I print the best in my windowless bathroom darkroom on my Gnome condenser enlarger through Schneider Componon S enlarging lens.
I use Ilford multigrade paper.
I have been doing this since the 1960s when I was a hippie, now I guess I'm called a hipster.
Oh yes and I play Vinyl, use a fountain pen and wear a mechanical watch.
I am on trend with ccd sensor digital cameras like my Nikon D40x and my old 2005 Ricoh GR digital 8 megapixel camera. Peace brothers
This made me laugh.
The hipster final boss
Hippy days
you're not a real hipster unless you use a 5mp or less digicam lol
Digital shutterbug here. Working on a project that the client wanted me to use film. The irony of using digital to scan is not lost on me…
Meanwhile I payed $0.25 for my Kodak DC3200 and have yet to fill my 1GB card.
And the pictures look pretty decent too!
Why the hell would anyone ask you to use film?? I mean it's great stuff but I don't get it. It just makes the job more expensive.
@@Biosynchro because its trendy
@@Biosynchro if the person is willing to fork up the money to get a film photo session, then why is that a problem? if they were really in a dire financial state, they wouldn't have went with the most expensive option for their photos.
@@shaqman8649 It's only a problem if there is a delay in processing, or if the lab screws up.
Great video - You could buy all the equipment (Tank, Changing bag, extension tubes, etc) for roughly the same as you already paid for the film + monobath, so the price per image is still only 0.20 moneys, and will decrease the more you use it!
Every time you upload I just watch immediately, you're my favorite channel
Wow thank you so much, I think that’s the first time someone has said that about my channel, really means a lot 🥹
😂😂😂 had a lot of fun watching this!!
Haha glad you enjoyed it
Bulk film...YES...monobath developer...YES...scan with digital camera...YES...colorise with Ai...YES......orgasmic...
Hahahaha 🙏😂
I love the sense of humor used for this video.
85 bucks for the film loader, 10 bucks for 5 empty rolls, about 45 bucks for a film development starter pack plus whatever the scanning solution costs. but note that all of these costs will shrink comparatively the more you do it.
Imagine scanning your negatives with a film camera... The system has caught you again! :D The idea of bulk loading looks good, but you have to have cartridges too...
Blooming brilliant! We support u. Big up yourself m8!
Actually, I did do this. The lab. My dad already had the gear. Even the print enlarger. Although I used my Nikon slide / film scan.
Now I need to try that Ai thingy. It looks fun
Thank you for your continued support man, I super appreciate it 🙌🥰 Definitely give it a try!
I wish more of the creators out there were that entertaining yet informative😄
It was so refreshing to watch this video. Brilliantly made
I appreciate that!!
Here in Brazil, it is 6 times more expensive, and we don't have many options to choose from.
6 billion*
@@re4796 lol, I wouldn't doubt if tomorrow the dollar was costing 6 billion
Thanks! You answered so many questions. Good job
Super Video! Finde ich cool, was du dir für eine Mühe gemacht hast. Preset habe ich gekauft. Kanal habe ich abonniert. Freue mich auf mehr ✌🏼
Wow, viele lieben Dank!!! Solche netten Kommentare machen es die Mühe wert 🥰
In the 1970's Freestyle Sales Co. was my non-Kodak film supplier. The "Classic European black-and-white film" turned out to be Ilford HP3 and FP3. "East European black-and-white film" was ORWO, which worked just fine with D-76 1:1 for every film. I did try Agfa Rodinal, since ORWO films were said to be a better match. Bulk 135 film was advertised as "a Penny a frame" when Kodak was the Rochester Giant. These days, "do it yourself" still saves money and "electronic scanning" is an added thing that I could only dream about back then.;)
The GDR was seen as "Eastern Europe" in the US? (We're talking about the US, yes?) I didn't know that. Probably more of a political categorization than a geographical one since I assume West Berlin was still Central Europe for them. Orwo in Bitterfeld is located quite a bit more Western than Berlin 😁
Where are you getting develop + scans for 12 bucks? It's always like 30 per roll for me.
I live in the Netherlands, and even I pay 12 euros for developing+scanning per roll
Wtf 30 per roll 😂
Apparently it's still cheaper than shooting some of the other films, like the Polaroids and Instax films (although Instax might be about the same price as a 35mm frame processed and printed on a 4x6 or 5x7 print by a lab, although a lot of labs I'm seeing only send you digital scans and sometimes your negatives back, but no prints -- or it's extra to get prints).
I would say even if you got just a bulk loader and film in bulk, that should cut down your overall cost by about 25% alone, but kep in mind that you'll have to invest ins ome tools to either get the film into cartridges or find a bulk reel for your camera, which not all cameras have.
I consider not discovering this channel sooner one of my biggest regrets in life. You're awesome man!
Hahahaha that might be the best compliment I've ever received.
Hey, rather than using AI to colorize your film, there's an alternative. It's slightly more time intensive, and uses 3x as much film, because you gotta take each picture 3 times in a row, but it works and all you need is some cheap clear colored plastic. Use the cheap clear colored plastic of red, green, and blue, as filters that go in front of the camera, one picture red, one green, one blue. your pictures will do best with a tripod for this. I don't know if it would be better to have the color screen/filters attached to the camera or tripod, i'm just going from an other video i watched, but once you have your red green and blue (or cyan, yellow, magenta, and regular black and white if you wanna have more crisp color for even more film use), you then digitally align them, and recompose from RGB or CMYK in something like GIMP (which is free). The 2 issues with this are that it uses more film per picture, and requires you take the exact same photo several times, which means no photographing anything that moves, unless you want absolutely strange technicolor ghosts. Personally I *do* want the strange technicolor ghosts, but that's just me. The way I learned this was from a video by Matt Gray (MattGrayYES) On how to use a gameboy camera to take color photos. the gameboy camera was 2-bit, 4-color grey-scale, and using red/green/blue filters in front of the lens, through simple multiplication, that's 64 colors that could be reproduced, and it worked. since B&W film isn't just 4 digital values, The colorspace is actually quite huge. His video referenced a photo taken with basically the same technique back between 1905 and 1915, and showed that photo from the library of congress, and it's gorgeous. back to this video, since you've split the cost of 3 rolls into 18 rolls, even using 3 shots per picture, it's still 7 rolls of color for the cost of 3, rather than 18 rolls of black and whites. Now, if it sounds like I don't have experience with actually doing this, it's because I don't. I'm in the process of trying to decide if I want to get into this as a hobby. Except instead of trying to take traditionally good photos, I want to take weird trippy looking photos by doing weird stuff with the film and possibly weird stuff with the developer. I saw a different video about making a film developer out of Vitamin C and Aspirin tablets disolved in something (video was by a channel called Flesh Simulator, and he also has a video on Infra-red color film techniques, though film isn't his main thing on the channel), and yet another video by another channel (thought emporium) about Microfilm and using it to create diffraction gratings. and it's just getting my noggin joggin'. I've also tried databending/datamoshing with digital cameras, and I'm curious what kind of weird stuff I could do with actual film. I'm just trying to decide if it's worth the initial investments for camera, developer tools, and the physical space that it takes up.
I think autochrome would be much easier
dude this vid was funny as hell, much love keep it up!
Thank you so much! 🥰
And then you decide to go and make your new cheap black and white bulk film 3x as expensive by buying some extra equipment for trichrome photography
The part, "If you don't have one, sucks to be you, but I respect you going full hipster", destroyed me xDD
this might be my favourite video so far
Funny thing is I got into film photography because I needed a cheap hobby. I get my Kodak Gold at the drug store for under $10, so it's like $20-$25 all in. My main hobby is firearms, with some of them costing around $2.50 a shot. Typically spending ~$300 per range trip, being able to take pictures for under $1.00 each is fantastic- and that's not even getting into the guns vs camera cost comparison. And dont get me started on night vision- those make Leicas look cheap.
Super fun educational video! I enjoyed your humor! Thank you for sharing your film photography secrets!
Dude, This video has forced me to subscribe!🤣 It would be good if you did one on how to do the chemical thing!
Apparently you can develop b&w film in coffee too! The process is called caffenol and is even cheaper
People tell me "but film photography is soooo expensive". I'm on less than average wage for th UK and I shoot around a hundred rolls a year across multiple formats including 35mm, 120, super 8 and std 8mm cine. Like you I use 30m bulk rolls for 35mm and look out for deals on the other formats. I develop B&W myself and scan it myself. I am lucky that I have a lab I can walk to from home which will develop any colour film and scan for £6. It doesn't have to be expensive. And that gives me money for my other hobbies (vinyl records, reel to reel tapes, attending upwards of 60 gigs a year, camping).
You had me dying at work 😂 great video brother!
Thank you!!!!
Stumbled upon your channel. Love it! Liked and subscribed!
I once bought 40 expired disposable cameras. I paid for them, if I remember correctly 10eur. Took the film canisters out of them, they where 400iso 12 exposures C41. I use them as iso 100-200, and develop in diy B&W developer. It doesn't get any cheaper than this.
if you wanted some sort of color without using ai you could use either bichrome or trichrome photography to get color (or pseudo-color in the case of bichrome) photographs, only problem is that it cuts the amount of photos you can take down to either a third or a half, all you need is a red green and blue filter for trichrome, or for bichrome, a red and cyan, orange and teal or yellow and teal/blue or, you could also use just a red filter and unfiltered as well. hope this helps, or at least doesnt hinder! :-)
Here in Brazil, local suppliers sell this Fomapan already rewound.
Omg.. in Australia the most expensive country on earth, a roll of cheap 1shot film is $20 Kodak portra is around $50 and around $35 to get them scanned.
It's an investment but I like the idea. What software or code do you use for the colorisation?
Hey, any idea about this?
@@alex.ubiedo no sorry
Using light meters with a film camera is like using a point and shoot digital one, you never have full control. IMHO you should learn how to shoot manual on a dslr/mirrorless first. Its much easier to learn how to get your exposure right when you have instant feedback.
Fr love ur style so much man!!!!!
How did you know that I'm german?!?
I love this video again mate!! Its so funny 🤣🤣🤣
Legend!
There's another way to get cheap. If you're some point'n'shoot/street photographer and you don't need creamy boheh from some legendary vintage lens - go to 110 system for ex. Pentax 110 Super od Minolta 110 SLR. You can cut 120 roll film into 4 strips and load to 110 cardrige so you've get ~100 frames/1 medium format roll. You can shoot any type of film (also color) ~4x cheaper per frame than 35mm. MAKE 110 GREAT AGAIN! :P
Hahaha that actually sounds super cool, didn't know that was possible!
I have had a much-loved Mju-II for the last 20 years, a Trip for 10 years and a Lubitel and I never use them because it’s too expensive and too complicated. No local labs any more. I have to do it all by post. Digital is better, overall, though it pains me to say it.
thanks so much for these tips felix! i got a free nikon fm2, and wanted to play around with it, inexpensively. you are way too funny i laughed through the entire video. im not even super into film but, subscribed!
The title really intrigued me until I saw the first 30 seconds. Please don’t get me wrong, the beginning was quite promising. But why should I buy a black-and-white film and then digitize it? By the way, photographing negatives with a digital camera and also using them up may seem like a good solution at first, but in the long run, it’s not very economical. The worst part is using AI to colorize black-and-white film; I might as well not bother at all. Analog presets in Lightroom make more sense, don’t they?
You can do the exact same thing with color film v4 500T
I really love your narrative man😂
This is a really fun video, well done!
Okay lets come back to photography later - A German with sense of humour ! Glitch in the matrix...
lustig !!! I was buying baulk in the 70s as a poor student. Now I old and I still poor lol, I sitting on a ton of old Kodak film and I got the same A1 not from my late mom. I did get a nice flatbed scanner, so i got that. I have Sony digital but I have been using the flatbed. Love the idea of cloericzed B/W film.
Thanks for watching! I'm also still sitting on a bunch of kodak film, from two years ago before the prices doubled...
hilarious, entertaining, kind of accurate, now I feel like my time is worthless. Or is that priceless?😂😂😂 thanks for sharing, I’m going to buy 400 hotdogs worth of film now.
Sick video! Just wondering where you get your music
Could you not just ge a cheap 35mm film scanner/digitiser instead of a DSLR?
Nice vid, I love the shot at flannels and beanies, seems like a UA-cam prerequisite to be successful 😂
I live in Canada and I just bought a 5-pack of Portra professional 400 speed film and it cost me $151
Fomapan is manufactured in the Czech Republic, my homeland👍🤟
I bought a 122m Roll of Vision 3 500t for 120€ (bringing me to about 0.05€ per Image) 🗿
Like the most expencive thing in my setup is my vuescan license 😭 ... And my 72 cameras 📷
Haha yeah it's the steadily growing camera collection that gets you 😂
120mm bulk film , where ?
Vienna, Austria- late 2024: €11 for 1 roll Kodak Vision color film INCLUDING developing.
I appreciate the idea but for other then the experts already here your explanation will get lost by the many that really need it. In my view a great idea that was presented for those that already could do it without your help.
Is the xc35 f2 better than the viltrox 33 mm f1.4 and the Sigma 30mm f1.4
fantastic...love this vid....more please
Best video I’ve seen in a while. Funny. A bit on point but not too much 😂
where can you buy bulk 120 film
Good job very entertaining love the video!
Thank you!
Are you interested in the myth of the Fuji Film Gx680 digital back?
It was a digital image sensor that you could insert into the back of the Gx680 instead of a 120mm film, and in theory still shoot the camera setup digitally. This was only released in Japan in 2004, but it's nowhere to be found in second hand markets.
I wish you could investigate or explore this myth.
There are a bunch of interesting contraptions like these from the era where film transitioned to digital. Leica did something similar with the R8 by offering a digital back, I would love to try one of those but they are very expensive on the used market unfortunately...
There was a kickstarter for something similar recently, I forgot the name of it but it's probably easy to find it. Ok, I googled, it's called I'm Back Film. But it's for 35mm.
what ai tool r u using?
I don't have a laptop to convert scans, whats the next cheapest alternative
bruh i calculated it with my camera and it went to $137,60 and it costs that much only camera, chemical, PATERSON 115 Universal Tank and one film roll ( damn.... )
This was so good!!!
Where do o get the film in bulk?
Really enjoyed watching this lol. Well done.
Shooting directly on film is still cheaper than shooting in digital then getting celluloid duplicates made.
Bruh you couldn't have come at a better time. Great ideas
Glad I could help 🙏
Half-frame?
I really enjoyed this video, soo funny!😅
Thank you so much for watching 😁
Fantastic - very informative - very humorous!!!
That was awesome
Thank you!!!
Excellent, thank you for sharing!!!
Hey how do you roll your own film
Very clever! I almost subscribed.....😁👍
This guys is hilarious! Love the video and great Idea!
Refreshing. Liked and subbed.
Brilliant, amusing and very useful
Thank you!!!
I die inside every time i show my pictures. "I look horrible! It's not the picture though, it's just me". What do you mean you look horrible? You're fucking goregeous!
But when showing film pictures i die inside at 50x speed.
Shot a roll of ultramax, got 30 good pictures out of 36. My biggest "film success" and my biggest photography technical achievement got quickly turned off by a not so nice "Ew i look horrible" aka "Don't dare showing this to anybody". Never forget guys, a good rope will always be quicker and cheaper than photography.
Thanks for measuring in hot dogs 🌭 for us Americans, i didn’t understand at first 😂
I could buy ColorPlus and Afgavista for 2$ here on my country.
Since war started between Ukraine and Russia, prices went up to 12$
WHAT THE FU
You beat capitalism 😂
From the hotdog metric people good video 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Thank you 😂😂❤️
Sorry we were not privileged!
To know how to use one of those apparatuses on film where you didn't had a screen, but you had to use your eye, you had to have a sense of prediction to be able to capture the moment. Ugh, and you could not adjust the light so easily.
I'm a sniper, whoop whoop.
why not just buy a digicam that shoots unlimited film photos?
E Laerning:Prices can be manipulated to manipulate Markets!
And the Market was i Phone Cameras! 🤔
"just use your digital camera to scan the film, if you don't have one, sucks for you"
:(
"But I respect you for going full hipster"
:D
Thank you
Wo lässt du deine Filme entwickeln?
Macht er selbst
@@flatcapguy0146 Das geht? Ich dachte, man bräuchte dafür so teure Maschinen.
In aud it’s 24 for film and 23 to develop with low scan 😂
I have achieved hipster enlightenment.
Heavy brown tint like gas station sushi ☠️
Brilliant 🙂
Good. Stuff. Great. Production.
I appreciate it!
Haha ich fühle dich so! Melde wegen Kodak bald die Privatinsolvenz an...