Simply the best. Anyone can use this thing without any guide. It’s so easy to navigate across waveforms with touch. Led rings around knobs make it easy to understand which channel is being used.
The interface does not look like it was made for fingers. Everything looks smaller than the average finger, controls look very difficult to operate and not so easy to use. The waveform manipulation looks cumbersome and unresponsive. It seems TEK is excelling in the hardware front and playing catch up on the software. I don't value a touch interface in a scope, I think it's really more work than dealing with good responsive mechanical controls. But when I see it advertised as "designed with touch in mind" and the resulting product is anything but, I feel compelled to comment.
![[UA] NAVI vs MOUZ | BO5 | IEM Rio 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CMBYk0cbGoA/mqdefault.jpg)
Simply the best. Anyone can use this thing without any guide. It’s so easy to navigate across waveforms with touch. Led rings around knobs make it easy to understand which channel is being used.
It has been used several times and loved.
nice work!
What is the frequency range of this oscilloscope
Thanks for your question. Please see this datasheet for more information: www.tek.com/en/datasheet/5-series-b-mso-mixed-signal-oscilloscope-datasheet
cheapest price? I have a space on the left side of My 465 :)
that looks awesome but very expensive
The interface does not look like it was made for fingers. Everything looks smaller than the average finger, controls look very difficult to operate and not so easy to use. The waveform manipulation looks cumbersome and unresponsive. It seems TEK is excelling in the hardware front and playing catch up on the software.
I don't value a touch interface in a scope, I think it's really more work than dealing with good responsive mechanical controls. But when I see it advertised as "designed with touch in mind" and the resulting product is anything but, I feel compelled to comment.
Not another touch screen, what a nightmare.