The actual F1 engines are limited for Reasons of Security. The auto union,whose power can't be discussed, takes advantage only after very much time,on straight road and only because Its engine had no limitations. Don't Forget that there are 85 Years Of difference between the two Cars!!
If you want to make an argument why not mention the bloody elephant in the room instead of taking sht F1 cars have so much downforce that they can’t possibly gop over 400 km/h whereas the auto union was designed only for high end speed
It is a Grand Prix car, compliant to grand prix regulations in 1937. Yes, it has a gigantic supercharged engine in a tiny aluminum hassis with zero safety, and would obviously no longer fulfill F1 regulation, but its still an 80 year old F1 car competeing in a drag race on a comperable footing with a modern one, and thats impressive.
In those days, racing drivers were dying like flies, there were no straight tracks, and in a winding race these cars were terrible for the driver. Almost every race involves at least one death, back then it was "normal" - that cars are races and races are dead bodies. Civilian cars were deliberately 20-30 horsepower per tonne for safety. Today, safety for civilians has deteriorated significantly, but for professional racing drivers, safety has increased significantly. Most people don't want slow, safe cars.
@@arkadiuszweiss Consumer car safety has immesurably improved in the last 40 years. And while yes, early motorracing was deadly, a death per race is nowhere near true. A death per season maybe.
Race tracks were different in the 1930's. Some had banked curves, like AVUS in Berlin. There the streamlined version of the Type C ran an average speed of 284.31 km/h during qualifying for the 1937 race. This record would not be bettered until 1957 at Monza, which had received a new high speed oval by then. For the normal GP season, Auto Union would run the non-streamlined version.
Wow, it only took 2km for the old auto union to come around the newer f1 car, and only riiiight at the finish. Id hardly call that humiliation considering the f1 car wouldve gained the lead back with a single 90° turn. I love the older cars, but come on man. This is an apples to pineapples comparison here. While both were used to race in europe for what is essentially the same category of races, they are so vastly different you couldnt even put them in the same room and think of them as competition with one another, let alone on an actual track. One is very classy and probably worth globs of money, whereas the other is extremely fast and can pull some of the craziest amount of lateral g's of any land vehicle ever made, while also being worth globs of money.
if the driver of the auto union decided to be a little more easier on the throttle at the start instead of doing a minute long burnout it would have overtaken the AMG much quicker
@@C-A-L-MIt would still has almost no downforce compared to a F1 car and it would still have awful steering angle, because it's a record car primarily used to attempt a new speed record on the straight. For this reason, the weels are covered to minimize drag. In fact, the Typ C Stromlinienfahrzeug used in the second record attempt got destroyed just because a gust of wind hits the car and kicked it hundreds of meters of track. The driver, Bernd Rosemeyer died immediately. The only other use was at the Internationales Avus Rennen but this circuit has highspeed curves.
Out of all the comments, only 3 people responded logically: it's a computer generated toy, people's. Nothing more, nothing less. Granted, and obviously, people can do almost anything given the right keyboard or logitech G29 steering wheel in this case. But fake is fake regardless...
Modern F1 : Get to top speed real quick, but, the aero prevent it from reaching 340Km/h. Auto Union Type C : Lack of traction cause if to pick up speed slowly, but, it's all about reducing drag. Top speed : 420 Km/h.
If Bernd Rosemeyer would have steared the Auto Union C, he wouldn't have waste so much time at the Start. It seems that the Driver underestimated the raw Power if this Car. No anti-slipping, no modern ABS Breaks. Rosemeyer reached a Top speed of 429,491 km/h or 266,560 miles per hour. That was a slightely modified Typ from Auto Union, instead Typ C it was Typ R= Record. Many think we have better Cars then back in the 1930, we haven't. Those Cars were absolutely Badass and it needed a certain kind of Man to handle them...
If the guy in that old car knew how to start without nearly crashing, he would have caught the modern car way earlier. The modern car ran way too much downforce, though.
È un confronto senza senso. La F1, a differenza dell'Auto Union del '37, è fatta per correre in un circuito, non per battere il record mondiale di velocità in rettilineo.
Huh. That sent me through an unexpected and interesting trip thru history I didn’t know about. Especially coming from an alt-right domestic terrorist cisgender heteronormative colonizing memefrog who perpetuates harmful stereotypes using racist dogwhistles and Russian bots.
There are so many levels of bullshit in this video it's hard to list all of them. The Auto Union would have flown into the air at that jump for example. And an F1 car would run without wings and easily provide 350-360 KPH, while providing more grip, easily outclassing the Auto Union simply because it could take those turns. Shall I go on?
imagine going 360 kph in a car that's over 80 years old, basically a glorified coffin,......
and then you shift up into 4th gear
An aluminium bathtub full of kerosene on bycicle wheels.
@@egoalter1276 with a big ol' engine and 1930s tech
The Autounion did over 420 km an hour back in 37...............
its crazy to think about, the landspeed record back then was 500 km/h in a vehicle with 36.7L engine and the Auto Union type C was 6.0L
The actual F1 engines are limited for Reasons of Security. The auto union,whose power can't be discussed, takes advantage only after very much time,on straight road and only because Its engine had no limitations. Don't Forget that there are 85 Years Of difference between the two Cars!!
If you want to make an argument why not mention the bloody elephant in the room instead of taking sht
F1 cars have so much downforce that they can’t possibly gop over 400 km/h whereas the auto union was designed only for high end speed
It is a Grand Prix car, compliant to grand prix regulations in 1937. Yes, it has a gigantic supercharged engine in a tiny aluminum hassis with zero safety, and would obviously no longer fulfill F1 regulation, but its still an 80 year old F1 car competeing in a drag race on a comperable footing with a modern one, and thats impressive.
Times have changed for sure
In those days, racing drivers were dying like flies, there were no straight tracks, and in a winding race these cars were terrible for the driver. Almost every race involves at least one death, back then it was "normal" - that cars are races and races are dead bodies. Civilian cars were deliberately 20-30 horsepower per tonne for safety. Today, safety for civilians has deteriorated significantly, but for professional racing drivers, safety has increased significantly. Most people don't want slow, safe cars.
@@arkadiuszweiss Consumer car safety has immesurably improved in the last 40 years. And while yes, early motorracing was deadly, a death per race is nowhere near true. A death per season maybe.
Dont forget that there is two versions of the auto union type c ,stromlinie and the normal one the one here is a stromlinie
Race tracks were different in the 1930's. Some had banked curves, like AVUS in Berlin. There the streamlined version of the Type C ran an average speed of 284.31 km/h during qualifying for the 1937 race. This record would not be bettered until 1957 at Monza, which had received a new high speed oval by then. For the normal GP season, Auto Union would run the non-streamlined version.
Nice, full throttle. 😁
In reality with the correct aero setting the f1 cars can reach 370 km/h (baku/mexiko) and ever more if there weren't any corners
Well, the Type C an do over 420 in world speed record trim.
Wow, it only took 2km for the old auto union to come around the newer f1 car, and only riiiight at the finish. Id hardly call that humiliation considering the f1 car wouldve gained the lead back with a single 90° turn. I love the older cars, but come on man. This is an apples to pineapples comparison here. While both were used to race in europe for what is essentially the same category of races, they are so vastly different you couldnt even put them in the same room and think of them as competition with one another, let alone on an actual track. One is very classy and probably worth globs of money, whereas the other is extremely fast and can pull some of the craziest amount of lateral g's of any land vehicle ever made, while also being worth globs of money.
Bet ur fun at parties
if the driver of the auto union decided to be a little more easier on the throttle at the start instead of doing a minute long burnout it would have overtaken the AMG much quicker
I thought it was just a fun demonstration of the two and that the Vintage car eventually passed it at all was interesting
well put f1 tyre compound on the autounion and grip is not a problem
@@C-A-L-MIt would still has almost no downforce compared to a F1 car and it would still have awful steering angle, because it's a record car primarily used to attempt a new speed record on the straight. For this reason, the weels are covered to minimize drag. In fact, the Typ C Stromlinienfahrzeug used in the second record attempt got destroyed just because a gust of wind hits the car and kicked it hundreds of meters of track. The driver, Bernd Rosemeyer died immediately.
The only other use was at the Internationales Avus Rennen but this circuit has highspeed curves.
F1 fuel consumption, 3 liter, Type C fuel consumption 597 litrer.
I thought maybe the 2022 Mercedes F1 car would run out of fuel! (being limited). That way the Auto Union Streamliner could catch 'im.
Is it possible to star with second gear? The type C wasted too much time just spinning it's wheels at the beginning
Can’t make a 1930s car grippy. Just no.
Cross ply tires dont help with getting grip.
Out of all the comments, only 3 people responded logically: it's a computer generated toy, people's. Nothing more, nothing less. Granted, and obviously, people can do almost anything given the right keyboard or logitech G29 steering wheel in this case. But fake is fake regardless...
No shit but it's a pretty close simulation since we know the power and drag and downforce and tyres thee things have
Audi ❤️❤️❤️❤️
Cool continue comme ça ⭐⭐⭐
Modern F1 : Get to top speed real quick, but, the aero prevent it from reaching 340Km/h.
Auto Union Type C : Lack of traction cause if to pick up speed slowly, but, it's all about reducing drag. Top speed : 420 Km/h.
Next up: 1970's Top Fuel dragster vs modern supercar
After what i can find the Auto Union Type C had a topspeed of ~ 340km/h, not over 400km/h...
Love CGI, almost looks real.
😂😂😂
Is a game
If Bernd Rosemeyer would have steared the Auto Union C, he wouldn't have waste so much time at the Start. It seems that the Driver underestimated the raw Power if this Car. No anti-slipping, no modern ABS Breaks. Rosemeyer reached a Top speed of 429,491 km/h or 266,560 miles per hour. That was a slightely modified Typ from Auto Union, instead Typ C it was Typ R= Record. Many think we have better Cars then back in the 1930, we haven't. Those Cars were absolutely Badass and it needed a certain kind of Man to handle them...
If the guy in that old car knew how to start without nearly crashing, he would have caught the modern car way earlier. The modern car ran way too much downforce, though.
Whats the point?
Humilliation says hahahahhahahaha, first corner of 2 degrees and bye!!!!
Understand... This is a CARTOON
I don't think you've ever seen a cartoon before
Auto is still prettier than F1 so it wins 😂
È un confronto senza senso. La F1, a differenza dell'Auto Union del '37, è fatta per correre in un circuito, non per battere il record mondiale di velocità in rettilineo.
Cartoon!! Dibus !!
:( I didn't see the virtual tag.. thought it was an actual race
now do the w125 rekordwagen vs the type c streamliner lol
Huh. That sent me through an unexpected and interesting trip thru history I didn’t know about.
Especially coming from an alt-right domestic terrorist cisgender heteronormative colonizing memefrog who perpetuates harmful stereotypes using racist dogwhistles and Russian bots.
There are so many levels of bullshit in this video it's hard to list all of them. The Auto Union would have flown into the air at that jump for example. And an F1 car would run without wings and easily provide 350-360 KPH, while providing more grip, easily outclassing the Auto Union simply because it could take those turns. Shall I go on?
Auto union in real life max 310 kmh
Mmmm... cut before braking attempt...
La F1 va più di 334 km/h
Wünsche gehen Erfüllung
silly
Albern
This proves nothing because its fake and even if it did it took the lead after a very long time and would have lost it with the first slight turn
Your lack of driving skill in this simulator is embarassing 😅🤣
Krakauer
Schöne Annimation. Hört auf so ein Quatsch zu verbreiten!
Es ist keine Animation, sondern ein Spiel
F1 runs out of electric power as there is no breaking zones to charge battery
Hope nobody believed these were real cars.
AI
this video is clearly for non car guys,f1 doesnt have working DRS,so with that working,audi will be destroyed,so my rating of this video is : 💩
It's a fake video,..
Bro, it's just a game, no one said it was real
Simulation BS
This is Fake..
Of course capitain obvious its just a game 😑
What's the message?