Star Trek Online - Credence Miracle Worker Dreadnought Cruiser + Bonus

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
  • #startrekonline #startrek #startrekdiscovery
    Demorecord de la nave Credence Miracle Worker Dreadnought Cruiser [T6]
    (Demorecord of the ship Credence Miracle Worker Dreadnought Cruiser [T6])
    Código de referencia de Epidemic Sound (1er Mes Gratis) :
    (Epidemic Sound Reference Code (1st Month for Free) :
    share.epidemic...
    Link de la Wiki de STO con más datos sobre la nave :
    (Link to the STO Wiki with more information about the ship) :
    stowiki.net/wi...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 55

  • @actschp1
    @actschp1 3 місяці тому +26

    The Discovery era (32nd century) ships with the detached nacelles just looks ridiculous to me. Great modeling work though. The lines were clean. Didn't particularly like the blunt nose, though. Was kind of jarring.

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  3 місяці тому +9

      @@actschp1 yeah im not a big fan of the floating nacelles,but is part of the game and i want to show how they look for those who like it

  • @brothersgt.grauwolff6716
    @brothersgt.grauwolff6716 3 місяці тому +6

    For the Cleonic Dynasty!

  • @CaptRicoSakara
    @CaptRicoSakara 2 місяці тому +3

    Got my Credence Cruiser a few days ago. Working on the mastering during the Summer Event.

  • @SoHBetaSword
    @SoHBetaSword 2 місяці тому +2

    Everytime I see a new Disgracery-Ship, I'm forced to see a new Abomination.

  • @JeffreyTappan-bb8rr
    @JeffreyTappan-bb8rr 3 місяці тому +4

    A dreadnaught and a cruiser are 2 different classes of ships.

  • @GreenDragonReviews
    @GreenDragonReviews 2 місяці тому +2

    I wonder when this ship is going to be available on the consoles it definitely seems to have better stats than the Lexington

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  2 місяці тому

      @@GreenDragonReviews usualy is like a month later from PC,but it always depend of them.

  • @AlHaqimBarrett
    @AlHaqimBarrett 3 місяці тому +3

    Thank you for the video

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  3 місяці тому +1

      Hey 😁👋 No problem,glad you like it 🫂

  • @tonyf8167
    @tonyf8167 2 місяці тому +3

    so what happens to this ship when an anomaly that 'prevents' whatever is bridging the air gaps in the superstructure is encountered???

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  2 місяці тому +1

      @@tonyf8167 is almost the same thing i though when i saw the upgrade to the Discovery,as a fan of Star Trek the constant in this show is the main ship loosing shields and power in combat,i don't know the answer on how those floating parts don't go away when the ship loose power,i still don't get it,maybe the writters and the director who invent this thing have the answer.

    • @Mineralwasser436
      @Mineralwasser436 2 місяці тому +3

      it is explained in the Episode where the conversion takes place. Energy is only needed to move the parts, otherwise all parts stay in place

    • @tonyf8167
      @tonyf8167 2 місяці тому

      @@Mineralwasser436 doesnt answer the question...

    • @Mineralwasser436
      @Mineralwasser436 2 місяці тому

      @@tonyf8167 It's the 32nd century. Air is no longer a problem. Air for everyone...

    • @tonyf8167
      @tonyf8167 2 місяці тому

      @@Mineralwasser436 still havent answered the question...

  • @benyseus6325
    @benyseus6325 3 місяці тому +21

    God discovery era ships are so blech…

    • @nps5886
      @nps5886 2 місяці тому

      Yeah hate the way everything seems to float next to the ship

  • @LF-je6py
    @LF-je6py 2 місяці тому +2

    I dont get the detached parts in discovery ships, but the design is pretty good and fits 100%

  • @cesarr8582
    @cesarr8582 3 місяці тому +2

    Mas alla del debate estetico o tecno-ilogico a alguien le puede gustar estas naves asi que siga nomas .
    y el detalle del final es solo para unos pocos xD

  • @cesarr8582
    @cesarr8582 3 місяці тому +2

    Hay gente que le gusta el diseño de las partes de la nave flotando de discovery, honestamente yo no le veo sentido (aun cuando digan que tienen nucleos warp mucho mas efectivos y de alto poder) el hecho de tener esas cosas flotando sostenido por campos de energía es un desperdicio extremo, ademas del hecho de contradecir la existencia de los escudos en forma de burbuja mientras esquivan torpedos separando las partes :S
    Pero en fin sera que no me va discovery en si xD
    Aun asi buen video pibe

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  3 місяці тому +2

      No te preocupes que yo tampoco soy tan fan de DSC,pero tengo que mostrar la nave igual para los que tal vez tengan la chance de poder conseguirla,aunque sea en la campaña

  • @dennisclifford617
    @dennisclifford617 2 місяці тому +1

    How can the war-nacelles be detached, Tractor beams?

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  2 місяці тому

      ​@@dennisclifford617 in Discovery they said is some kind of nano technology.here's the link ua-cam.com/video/zRDfr8QBknM/v-deo.htmlsi=QfhP1CCrAfwoGF8C

    • @BrockSamson-i1i
      @BrockSamson-i1i 2 місяці тому +1

      @@martinarg1979 the link goes to a 3 minute video that features one line "programable matter has been integrated with our pre-burn technology"
      - that's the laziest writing possible

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  2 місяці тому

      @@BrockSamson-i1i 🤷‍♂ I know,it not explain anything but it's what it's...magic lol

  • @진현-i3g
    @진현-i3g 3 місяці тому +2

    Not the best but i do like the design on the back but my favorite 32nd century starships were the new constitution class the janeway class and the Eisenberg class mostly

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  3 місяці тому

      @@진현-i3g i have another video with all the other DSC ships 32c included but not with this one because the video is previous of this ship release.

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  3 місяці тому

      @@진현-i3g i have another video with all the other DSC ships 32c included but not with this one because the video is previous of this ship release.

    • @leonidasrodriguesdossantos9541
      @leonidasrodriguesdossantos9541 2 місяці тому +1

      @@martinarg1979 At 0:51 what is this type of phaser; 32c or 32c.Refit or Dsc? I'm asking because I have a Durgath Temporal Heavy Dreadnought Battlecruiser and the only thing missing is this type of weapon to finish the Stargate theme as if it were the Ancient Ones' drones firing. Thanks👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  2 місяці тому +1

      @@leonidasrodriguesdossantos9541 it comes with the 32c weapons (the blue ones) for more info check the wiki link in the description 😁 nos vemos hermano brasileño 🫂

    • @leonidasrodriguesdossantos9541
      @leonidasrodriguesdossantos9541 2 місяці тому +1

      @@martinarg1979 Thanks

  • @roguephoenix
    @roguephoenix 2 місяці тому +1

    is this that lockbox ship?

  • @dogleg
    @dogleg 2 місяці тому +1

    those bluetooth nacelles........

  • @31fernandovelazquez87
    @31fernandovelazquez87 Місяць тому +1

    Como se consigue esa nave?

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  Місяць тому

      @@31fernandovelazquez87 es una nave especial de las infinity lockbox,hay 4 maneras de conseguirla,1)abriendo cajas,2)en el exchange con EC( si es que hay alguno vendiéndola),3)en la campaña del año que viene,4) en el mercado de Mudd pero va a tardar en que la pongan ahí.

  • @ShawnBeckmann-f4h
    @ShawnBeckmann-f4h Місяць тому +1

    its an ugly ship though not as ugly as that Damn Excelsior class!

  • @arko09
    @arko09 3 місяці тому +1

    Despite it being impossible, I want an Eaglemoss-style model of the Credence.

  • @Exile-exe
    @Exile-exe 2 місяці тому +1

    How does the crew get to the other parts of the ship not attached?
    You sure you thought this through?

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  2 місяці тому

      @@Exile-exe is from Discovery show i didnt ivent it,and in that time they have personal transporters

  • @sbat6074
    @sbat6074 3 місяці тому +1

    cool post

  • @paulspencer2542
    @paulspencer2542 3 місяці тому +5

    Horrible

  • @sabrewolf4129
    @sabrewolf4129 2 місяці тому +2

    The design is 100% stupid and makes no sense.

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  2 місяці тому

      @@sabrewolf4129 thank Kurtzman 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @ouroboris
    @ouroboris 3 місяці тому +7

    That is a bad bad bad design. Just stop it already.
    @LowellOda (reply not working) Sorry, I forgot that I'm only supposed to come here and comment if I like the design. My bad.

    • @martinarg1979
      @martinarg1979  3 місяці тому +2

      it seems it can stop in a starbase with that front that flat like it hit a wall lol

    • @LowellOda
      @LowellOda 3 місяці тому

      why did you come here if you didn't like the design?